Abstract
A metallacycle-centered approach to the assembly of partially aromatic synthetic steroids was investigated as a means to prepare a boutique collection of unique steroidal agents. The synthesis and discovery of estra-1,3,5(10),6,8-pentaene-2,16α-diol (VII) is described, along with structure–activity relationships related to its cytotoxic properties. Overall, VII was found to have a GI50 0.2 μg/mL (~ 800 nM) in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells, be an efficacious estrogen receptor agonist with potency for ERβ > ERα (ERβ EC50 = 21 nM), possess selective affinity to the cdc-2-like kinase CLK4 (Kd = 350 nM), and be phenotypically related to paclitaxel by an unbiased panel assessment.
Graphical Abstract

It is widely appreciated that breakthroughs in organic chemistry have a profound impact on drug-discovery by impacting synthesis design through the establishment of new retrosynthetic relationships.1 In short, effective means of constructing novel compositions of matter in a time- and cost-effective manner can serve as the scientific foundation to drug discovery and medicinal chemistry campaigns. With the appreciation that natural product structures continue to play what some have referred to as “a highly significant role in drug discovery and development,”2 and that some classes of natural products have been a particularly rich source of FDA-approved drugs, efforts have recently been directed toward understanding the scope and limitations associated with synthesis pathways that provide access to such compounds. In particular, compositions of matter that would well be recognized as steroidal in nature have been remarkably successful in the clinic as treatments for a wide range of indications, and this broad class of molecules is understood to be the most well-studied and successful class of natural product-inspired pharmaceuticals.3 While seeming to therefore represent a mature area of medicinal science that has thrived due to advances in organic chemistry, we believe that exploration in this area remains quite constrained due to inherent limitations associated with compound synthesis: (1) semisynthesis is effective for broad exploration of only the natural enantiomeric series,4 and (2) despite the myriad of approaches to de novo synthesis of steroids, highly efficient and flexible routes remain scarce.5 This perspective has fueled our curiosity in exploring this area of chemical science, and has recently led to the establishment of a new convergent strategy for the asymmetric synthesis of partially aromatic steroids.6 As illustrated in Figure 1, the approach features a metallacycle-mediated annulative cross-coupling reaction (1 + 2 → 3), regioselective cyclopropanation (3 → 4) and a new acid-mediated vinylcyclopropane rearrangement cascade (4 → 5). Appreciating that the starting enyne 2 is easily derived from epichlorohydrin, this approach has enabled asymmetric construction of steroidal species like 5 in as few as five chemical steps. Here, we describe the application of this synthetic platform as an enabling technology to fuel a search for new bioactive agents. These efforts have led to the synthesis of a boutique colletion of partially aromatic steroids and the discovery of a molecule that possesses potent growth inhibitory properties in several human cancer cell lines (e.g., MDA-MB-231, AsPC-1), and has further been found to be: (1) an efficacious agonist of the estrogen receptor beta7 (ERβ; EC50 = 21 nM) with 4-fold greater selectivity than 17-β- estradiol for ERβ compared to ERα, (2) an inducer of mitotic arrest, and (3) a ligand to the cdc-2-like kinase CLK4 (Kd = 350 nM).8
Figure 1:
Introduction.
a = avaliable in 2–3 steps from epichlorohydrin. b = Ti(Oi - Pr)4, n-Buli. c= HCX3, KOH. d = TiCl4, MeNO2
In the course of studying our recently established synthetic pathway to partially aromatic steroids, it was observed that final acid-mediated formation of the B-ring can proceed with rearrangement.6 As illustrated in Figure 2A, treatment of the p methoxyphenyl-substituted hydrindane (6) with titanium tetrachloride and isopropanol in nitromethane leads to a steroidal structure whose resulting A-ring methyl ether resides at C2 rather than C3 (7). This observation is consistent with a mechanism for cyclization where 6 is first converted to intermediate A through a sequence that is thought to include protodesilylation, removal of the TBS-protecting group, generation of a cyclopropylcarbinyl cation, and selective ring opening to the furnish a homopropargylic cation (A).9 Site-selective Friedel–Crafts alkylation then is speculated to deliver spirocyclic intermediate B, and selective 1,2-shift of the sp2 carbon rather than the dibromomethylene, rearomatization of the A-ring, and loss of HBr furnishes 7 in 54–69% yield. While mechanistically interesting, this process provides a functionalized steroidal composition that is unique in the literature and is loosely related to the natural products 17-β- estradiol and 2-methoxyestradiol (Figure 2B). Notably, 17-β- estradiol is a known agonist of the estrogen receptors α and β (ERα and ERβ), and 2-methoxyestradiol has been described as a cytotoxic agent whose mechanism of action may include targeting microtubules.10
Figure 2:
Acid-mediated B-ring formation with additional rearrangement, and the similarity of 7 to 17-β-estradiol and 2-methoxyestradiol.
Given the growing appreciation for selective agonism of ERβ as a mechanism of value for the development of anticancer agents and compounds of relevance across a diverse therapeutic landscape (i.e., cancer, neurodegeneration, schizophrenia, and neuropathic pain, among others),11 and the claim that some 16-hydroxyestratrienes have selective estrogenic activity,12 7 was viewed as a potentially interesting intermediate of value in medicinal pursuits. In particular, this compound houses functionality that was reasoned to enable straightforward structural modification within the A, B, and D-rings (Figure 3A). In particular, the nature of 7 would allow for systematic variation at C2, C6 and C16 – molecular sites that, to our knowledge, have not been systematically explored in the context of this type of steroidal system.
Figure 3.
Reactions employed to perturb substitution at C2, C6 and C16. NFSi =N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide.
The scope of potential modifications of 7 was kept small, with the goal of providing a collection of novel steroidal compositions of matter that would retain overall advantageous physical properties in the context of medicinal chemistry. For example, every compound prepared would retain at least one free alcohol to favorably impact solubility characteristics, while no modifications were considered that would greatly increase lipophilicity of any given member of the collection. The precise reactions that were embraced to transform 7 to steroidal targets of interest are depicted in Figure 3B, and include: (1) demethylation,13 (2) Sonogashira coupling,14 (3) Pd-catalyzed debromination, (4) lithium–halogen exchange/fluorination,15 and (5) Mistunobu reaction.16 These reaction processes were used in synthesis pathways that delivered a collection of fifteen compounds (I – XV; Figure 4) that were evaluated to identify molecules in the collection that have anticancer properties.
Figure 4:
Novel steroids and their growth inhibitory properties [GI50 (μM)] in MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer) and AsPC-1 (pancreatic cancer). 40 μM was the highest concentration tested.
Without a particular biomolecular target in mind, initial assessment of each of these agents was done in simple growth inhibition assays with two human cancer cell lines: MDA-MB-231 (breast) and AsPC-1 (pancreatic). As illustrated in Figure 4, most of the compounds possessed modest GI50 values in the range of ~10–40 μM. Interestingly, compound VII stood out among the group, possessing a GI50 value for the MDA-MB-231 human tumor cell line of ~0.2 μg/mL (~800 nM), and a GI50 value for the AsPC-1 human tumor cell line of ~0.5 μg/mL (2 μM). Varying stereochemistry at C16 led to a significant drop in activity (see VIII), while introduction of F, Br, or an alkynyl motif at C6 also negatively impacted activity (see III, X, and XV), as did the presence of a C2 methyl ether (see V).
In an effort to explore the potential medicinal value of VII, it was further characterized in a commercial panel of 12 human primary cell-based systems designed to model complex human tissue and disease biology of the vasculature, skin, lung and inflammatory tissues (“BioMAP Diversity PLUS panel”).17 This panel has been reasoned to offer an “unbiased means of characterizing a test agent across a broad set of systems modeling various human disease states. A test agent is used to generate a “signature profile” that can be compared to a reference database of >4,000 agents including biologics, approved drugs, chemicals and experimental agents. In this way a compound can be classified with respect to known biologically active agents as a result of an unbiased comparison across a wide variety of potential mechanisms of action. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the BioMAP analysis of compound VII resulted in favorable comparison to both 17-β estradiol (a dual ERα and ERβ agonist) as well as 2-methoxyestradiol. However, this analysis also indicated a correlation with several microtubule targeting agents (combretastatin A4, 2-methoxyestradiol and paclitaxel).18
With great interest in the potential value of steroid VII as an anticancer agent, subsequent investigation led to the discovery that it arrests cells in mitosis (see Supporting Information (SI) Fig. S16) and AutoDock simulations led to a speculation that VII may interact with a number of cyclin dependent kinases. As such, we moved forward to establish a profile of VII as a potential kinase inhibitor. Evaluation of VII in a panel of 468 kinases led to the conclusion that it inhibits a very small percentage of these targets (S-score(35) = 0.03).19 In fact, follow up Kd determinations revealed that compound VII has selective affinity to the cdc-2-like kinase CLK4 (Kd = 350 nM), with modest affinity toward CLK1, CLK2, and DYRK1A (Kd values of 1.4, 2.0, and 2.0 μM, respectively). Using an established model for inhibition of CLK1,2,4,20 however, we found no evidence of CLK inhibitory activity in cells (see SI Fig. S17).
Given the structural similarity of VII to 17-β-estradiol, and the BioMAP analysis that grouped these agents as being phenotypically related across a broad panel of human primary cell-based systems, we assessed its effects on ERα and ERβ. This effort was initiated with the knowledge that some 16-hydroxyestratrienes have been claimed to possess selective estrogenic activity, with preferential action on bone rather than the uterus.12 While not showing activity as an antagonist at either human receptor at concentrations up to 10 μM, this unique steroidal composition proved to be a potent agonist of ERβ with an EC50 of 21 nM (average; n = 2; see SI for assay details). Notably, it is also unique in that it demonstrates approximately a 4-fold shift in selectivity favoring agonism of ERβ over ERα in comparison to 17-β-estradiol (Figure 5).21
Figure 5.
Steroid VII is a selective agonist of ERβ, demonstrating a 4-fold shift in comparison to 17-β-estradiol.
Overall, a new approach to the de novo construction of partially aromatic steroids has served as an enabling technology for the discovery of a natural product-inspired agent (VII) that has growth inhibitory properties in several cancer cell lines, with a GI50 of ~0.2 μg/mL (~800 nM) in MDA-MB-231 cells. Further analysis revealed that this agent is an efficacious agonist of the estrogen receptor with 4-fold selectivity for ERβ over ERα in comparison to 17-β-estradiol, and it induces mitotic arrest in cells. An unbiased phenotypic screen (BioMAP) analysis further grouped VII as being related to the clinically relevant microtubule-targeting agent paclitaxel. Intriguingly, a number of publications studying ERβ-agonists have reported a G2/M phase arrest,22 and perhaps these two mechanisms are related. Notably, the chemical platform that fueled this discovery also has allowed for the establishment of first-generation structure–activity relationships of VII that relate molecular changes at C2, C6 and C16 to growth inhibitory properties in the context of two different human tumor cancer cell lines. We are looking forward to further investigating this approach to the asymmetric synthesis of partially aromatic steroids in the context of an enabling technology for the discovery of medicinally relevant agents, as well as investigating the efficacy and mechanism of VII in vivo.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Institutes of Health (GM080266) and a Munck–Pfefferkorn grant from the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College. The authors also acknowledge Profs. John Katzenellenbogen (University of Illinois) and Jack Vanden Heuvel (Pennsylvania State University) for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Procedures, spectroscopic data, and details regarding all biological evaluations (growth inhibitory assays, Kinomescan, BioMap, and ER-assay information). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES
- (1).Blakemore DC; Castro L; Churcher I; Rees DC; Thomas AW; Wilson DM; Wood A Nature Chem. 2018, 10, 383–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Newman DJ; Cragg GM; Kingston DGI In The practice of Medicinal Chemistry, 4th ed; Wermuth CG; Aldous D; Raboisson P; Rognan D Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2015; pp 101–139. [Google Scholar]; (b) Newman DJ; Cragg GM J. Nat. Prod 2016, 79, 629–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Lednicer D Steroid Chemistry at a Glance (Wiley, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- (4).Nising CF; Bräse S Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2008, 47, 9389–9391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).(a) Zeelen FJ Nat. Prod. Rep 1994, 11, 607–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sarabér FCE; de Groot A Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 5363–5383. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Kim WS; Du K; Eastman A; Hughes RP; Micalizio GC Nature Chem. 2018, 10, 70–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).(a) Mosselman S; Polman J; Dijkema R FEBS Lett. 1996, 392, 49–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kuiper GGJM; Enmark E; Pelto-Huikko M; Nilsson S; Gustafsson J-Å Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, 93, 5925–5930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).(a) Petsalaki E; Zachos G Nature Comm. 2016, 7:111451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Coombs TC; Tanega C; Shen M; Wang JL; Auld DS; Gerritz SW; Schoenen FJ; Thomas CJ; Aubé J Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2013, 23, 3654–3661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nayler O; Stamm S; Ullrich A Biochem. J 1997, 326, 693–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).(a) Mazur RH; White WN; Semenow DA; Lee CC; Silver MS; Roberts JD J. Am. Chem. Soc 1959, 81, 4390–4398. [Google Scholar]; (b) Winstein S; Kosower EM J. Am. Chem. Soc 1959, 81, 4399–4408. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wiberg KB; Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar]; (d) Wiberg KB; Hiatt JE J. Am. Chem. Soc 1968, 90, 6495–6500. [Google Scholar]; (e) Baldwin JE; Foglesong WD J. Am. Chem. Soc 1968, 90, 4311–4315. [Google Scholar]
- (10).(a) Cushman M; He H-M; Katzenellenbogen JA; Lin CM; Hamel EJ Med. Chem 1995, 38, 2041–2049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mabjeesh NJ; Escuin D; Lavallee TM; Pribluda VS; Swartz GM; Johnson MS; Willard MT; Zhong H; Simons JW; Giannakakou P Cancer Cell, 2003, 3, 363–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ka-math K; Okouneva T; Larson G; Panda D; Wilson L; Jordan MA Mol. Cancer Ther 2006, 5, 2225–2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Mueck AO; Seeger H Steroids, 2010, 75, 625–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Li W; Sun H; Xu S; Zhu Z; Xu J Future Med. Chem 2017, 9, 1765–1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wigerup C; Páhlman S; Bexell D Pharmacol. Therapeut 2016, 164, 152–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Kumar BS; Raghuvanshi DS; Hasanain M; Alam S; Sarkar J; Mitra K; Khan F; Negi AS Steroids, 2016, 110, 9–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Calinescu A-A; Castro MG Transl. Cancer Res 2016, 5(S1), S54–S60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Rao PN; Cessac JW; Tinley TL; Mooberry SL Steroids, 2002, 67, 1079–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).(a) Poelzl G; Kasai Y; Mochizuki N; Shaul PW; Brown M; Mendel-sohn ME Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, 97, 2836–2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Helguero LA; Faulds MH; Gustafsson J-Å; Haldosén L-A Oncogene, 2005, 24, 6605–6616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Leventhal L; Brandt MR; Cummons TA; Piesla MJ; Rogers KE; Harris HA Eur. J. Pharmacol 2006, 553, 146–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Cvoro A; Tatomer D; Tee M-K; Zogovic T; Harris HA; Leitman DC J. Immunol 2008, 180, 630–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Gardell LR; Hyldtoft L; Del Tredici AL; Andersen CB; Fairbairn LC; Lund BW; Gustafsson M; Brann MR; Olsson R; Piu F Eur. J. Pharmacol 2008, 592, 158–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Sareddy GR; Nair BC; Gonugunta VK; Zhang Q; Brenner A; Brann DW; Tekmal RR; Vadlamudi RK Mol. Cancer Ther 2012, 11, 1174–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) McFarland K; Price DL; Davis CN; Ma J-N; Bonhaus DW; Burstein ES; Olsson R ACS Chem. Neuro 2013, 4, 1249–1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Hinsche O; Girgert R; Emons G; Gründker C Int. J. Oncol 2015, 46, 878–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Ponnusamy S; Tran QT; Harvey I; Smallwood HS; Thiyagarajan T; Banerjee S; Johnson DL; Dalton JT; Sullivan RD; Miller DD; Bridges D; Narayanan R FASEB J. 2016, 31, 266–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Sareddy GR; Li X; Liu J; Viswanadhapalli S; Garcia L; Gruslova A; Cavazos D; Garcia M; Strom AM; Gustafsson J-A; Tekmal RR; Brenner A; Vadlamudi RK Sci. Rep 2016, 6:24185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Ma J-N; McFarland K; Olsson R; Burstein ES ACS Chem. Neuro 2016, 7, 1180–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Jameera Begam A; Jubie S; Nanjan MJ Bioorg. Chem 2017, 71, 257–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Rota S-G; Roma A; Dude L; Ma C; Stevens R; MacEachern J; Graczyk J; Espiritu SMG; Rao PN; Minden MD; Kreinin E; Hess DA; Doxey AC; Spagnuolo PA Mol. Cancer Ther 2017, 16, 2618–2626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Schüler-Toprak S; Moehle C; Skrzypczak M; Ortmann O; Treeck O BMC Cancer, 2017, 17:319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (o) Warner M; Huang B; Gustafsson J-A Trends Pharmacol. Sci 2017, 38, 92–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (p) Pinton G; Nilsson S; Moro L Oncogenesis, 2018, 7:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (q) Minutolo F; Macchia M; Katzenellenbogen BS; Katzenellenbogen JA Med. Res. Rev 2011, 31, 364–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (r) Paterni I; Granchi C; Katzenellenbogen JA; Minutolo F Steroids, 2014, 90, 13–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Kuenzer H; Knauthe R; Lessl M; Fritzemeier K-H; Hegele-Hartung C; Boemer U; Mueller G; Kosemund D 16-Hydroxyestratrienes as Selectively Active Estrogens. US 7,109,360 B1, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 19, September 2006
- (13).Hilscher J-C Steroid Ether Splitting. US 3,956,348, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 25 February 1975. [Google Scholar]
- (14).(a) Chinchilla R; Nájera C Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 5084–5121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chin-chilla R; Nájera C Chem. Rev 2007, 107, 874–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Zajac BJ Org. Chem 1999, 64, 1902–1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).(a) Fletcher S Org. Chem. Front 2015, 2, 739–753. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kumara Swamy KC; Bhuvan Kumar NN; Balaraman E; Pavan Kumar KVP Chem. Rev 2009, 109, 2551–2651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).The “BioMAP Diversity PLUS panel” includes 12 human primary cell-based systems that are designed to model complex human tissue and disease biology of the vasculature, skin, lung and inflammatory tissues. Quantitative measurements of biomarker activities across this broad panel, along with comparative analysis of the biological activities of known bioactive agents in a reference database were used to predict the properties of compound VII (see SI).
- (18).See Supporting Information for details concerning the KINOMEscan assay, BioMAP analysis, Kd determinations, and estrogen receptor α and β assays.
- (19).“S-score”, or “Selectivity Score”, is a quantitative measure of selectivity that is calculated by dividing the number of kinases that compounds bind to by the total number of distinct kinases tested. See Supporting Information for additional information and VII’s tree spot diagram.
- (20).Araki S; Dairiki R; Nakayama Y; Murai A; Miyashita R; Iwatani M; Nomura T; Nakanishi O PLoS One, 2015, 10:e0116929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).The structurally related 17-β-dihydroequilenin has been reported to have a related shift in selectivity for agonism of ER-β. See: Hsieh RW; Rajan SS; Sharma SK; Greene GL Steroids, 2008, 73, 59–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).(a) Sareddy GR; Li X; Liu J; Viswanadhapalli S; Garcia L; Gruslova A; Cavazos D; Garcia M; Strom AM; Gustafsson JA; Tekmal RR; Brenner A; Vadlamudi RK Sci. Rep 2016, 6:24185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bossard C; Busson M; Vindrieux D; Gaudin F; Machelon V; Brigitte M; Jacquard C; Pillon A; Balaguer P; Balabanian K; Lazennec G PLoS One, 2012, 7:e44787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Paruthiyil S; Cvoro A; Tagliaferri M; Cohen I; Shtivelman E; Leitman DC Breast Cancer Res. Treat 2011, 129, 777–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





