ABSTRACT
Principal component analysis (PCA) has been widely used in nutritional epidemiology to derive dietary patterns. However, although PCA-derived dietary patterns are population-dependent, their reproducibility in different populations is largely unexplored. We aimed to investigate whether major dietary patterns are consistently identified among different populations within a country and, if so, how similar these dietary patterns are. We conducted a systematic review of PCA-derived dietary patterns in Japanese adults using PubMed and Web of Science for English articles and Ichushi-Web and CiNii databases for Japanese articles. We assessed the reproducibility of major dietary patterns using congruence coefficients (CCs), with values ≥0.80 considered to represent fair similarity. From 65 articles (80 studies) included in this review, 285 different dietary patterns were identified. Based on the names of these patterns, major dietary patterns were Western (n = 34), Japanese (n = 12), traditional (n = 10), traditional Japanese (n = 9), healthy (n = 18), and prudent (n = 9) patterns. When assessment was limited to high-quality data (i.e., studies based on a sample size ≥200 and use of a validated dietary assessment questionnaire or multiple-day dietary record), the median CC was low for Western (0.44), traditional (0.59), and traditional Japanese (0.31) patterns. Conversely, the median CC was 0.89 for healthy, 0.86 for prudent, and 0.80 for Japanese patterns; and the proportion of pairs with a CC ≥0.80 was 87.3%, 64.3%, and 50.0%, respectively. Characteristics shared among these 3 dietary patterns included higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, vegetables, potatoes, fruits, pulses, and pickles. In conclusion, this systematic review showed that some of the major dietary patterns are relatively reproducible in different populations within a country, whereas others are not. This highlights the importance of careful interpretation of PCA-derived dietary patterns. Our findings in Japan should be confirmed in different countries and globally. This study was registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ as CRD42018087669.
Keywords: dietary pattern, food consumption pattern, principal component analysis, factor analysis, congruence coefficient, reproducibility, similarity
Introduction
Because it is not possible to investigate the potential synergistic effects of foods and nutrients using the traditional single food and nutrient approach, nutritional epidemiology has recently made a major shift to the assessment of dietary patterns (1). There are 2 main approaches to derive dietary patterns: the a priori (hypothesis-derived) and a posteriori (data-derived) approaches. The a posteriori approach is suitable for describing a representative picture of the variation in diet in a specific population and has been applied in many studies (2, 3). For these analyses, the most commonly used method is principal component analysis (PCA), a data-reduction method based on correlation or covariance matrices of the original variables that produces a set of values for linearly uncorrelated variables (components, factors, or patterns).
One of the major criticisms of PCA-derived dietary patterns is that the dietary patterns obtained are population- dependent and may not be reproducible in other populations, limiting generalizability (4–6). In fact, although the reproducibility of PCA-derived dietary patterns in the same population has been investigated, using different dietary assessment methods or at different time points (7–12), reproducibility in different populations has been largely overlooked (13, 14). Several researchers have acknowledged in their systematic reviews and meta-analyses that PCA-derived dietary patterns are not easily comparable between different study populations despite the use of similar labels by the original authors (15–20). Nevertheless, these dietary patterns have been summarized without substantial reservations (15, 16) or, at most, according to dietary patterns with similar characteristics subjectively considered by review authors (17–20). Systematic evaluation on the reproducibility of major dietary patterns in different populations would provide important insights into the possible generalizability of dietary pattern studies.
Partly due to the low prevalence of coronary artery disease and long life expectancy of Japanese, Japanese dietary habits have long attracted the interest of researchers from other countries (21, 22). The Japanese diet typically includes high intakes of refined grains (mainly white rice), seaweeds, vegetables, fish, soybean products, and green tea and low intakes of whole grains, processed meat, nuts, and soft drinks (23, 24). Although many Japanese studies have applied PCA to derive dietary patterns, we are unaware of any systematic assessment of PCA-derived dietary patterns in different populations within a country in terms of similarity or reproducibility. If available, this kind of information would be helpful in the development of country-specific, food-based dietary guidelines.
Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of PCA-derived dietary patterns in free-living Japanese adults consuming a self-selected diet. We aimed to investigate whether major dietary patterns are consistently identified among different populations within a country and the degree of reproducibility of these dietary patterns.
Methods
The review protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (registration no: CRD42018087669). This systematic review was planned by 1 of the authors (KM) with the support of another author (SS) and conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (25, 26), as described below.
Eligibility criteria
Articles were eligible for inclusion if they 1) were full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals, 2) identified overall dietary patterns based on food intake using PCA (or factor analysis with a principal component procedure), and 3) enrolled community-dwelling adults (aged ≥18 y) living in Japan. Articles were excluded if they 1) were reviews, conference reports, or abstracts; 2) identified dietary patterns using PCA based exclusively on nutrient intake, nutritional biomarkers, or dietary behaviors or using cluster analysis or other methods of an a priori nature (including reduced rank regression and diet scores) or patterns of meals (rather than overall diet); or 3) focused only on a group of individuals who are different from the general population, including individuals with an illness (e.g., patients with diabetes), institutionalized individuals, pregnant or breastfeeding women, athletes, and individuals consuming special diets (e.g., vegetarians). No restriction on study design was imposed; data derived from healthy control subjects in case-control studies or baseline or run-in period data in experimental studies were considered eligible if all the eligibility criteria were met. Year of publication was not limited, but only articles written in English or Japanese were considered.
Search strategy
An electronic literature search was conducted by 1 of the authors (KM) on 5 February 2018 using PubMed (1966–present) and Web of Science Core Collection (1900–present) for English articles and Ichushi-Web (1977–present) and CiNii (1970–present) databases for Japanese articles. The following search string was used: (“dietary pattern” OR “diet pattern” OR “food pattern” OR “food intake pattern” OR “food consumption pattern” OR “eating pattern” OR “dietary quality” OR “diet quality” OR “dietary patterns” OR “diet patterns” OR “food patterns” OR “food intake patterns” OR “food consumption patterns” OR “eating patterns” OR “dietary qualities” OR “diet qualities”) AND (factor OR component OR cluster OR score OR factors OR components OR clusters OR scores) AND (japan OR japanese).
Study selection
Titles and abstracts of all articles retrieved in the electronic search were screened for eligibility by 1 of the authors (KM). This screening was independently duplicated by a review team consisting of 6 authors (NS, AF, XY, AH, HF, and H-CW). Any disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus or by another author (SS), if necessary. After duplicate articles were removed, the full texts of screened articles were retrieved. The reference lists of the articles identified during this process were also examined by hand search (by KM) to further identify potentially relevant articles. The full-text articles were then independently evaluated by 1 of the authors (KM) and by the review team (NS, AF, XY, AH, HF, and H-CW).
Data collection
Using a standardized, prepiloted form, data extraction was performed by 1 of the authors (KM) and checked by the review team (NS, AF, XY, AH, HF, and H-CW). Information extracted from each study included the following: author names, publication year, study year, characteristics of participants (sex, age, and sample size), dietary assessment method (including information on validity, number of days, and whether overall diet was assessed), rationales and procedures used to derive dietary patterns, number of foods considered in dietary pattern analysis (in addition to whether variables other than food intake were considered) and the unit of input variables, number of factors derived and variance explained, name of factors, naming strategy, foods with high (≥0.30 or ≤ −0.30) factor loadings, and for major dietary patterns (as described below), all factor loading values reported. When >1 article reported dietary patterns based on the same dietary assessment method in (almost) the same population (e.g., 2 separate articles on prospective cohort studies investigating associations of dietary patterns with diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the same population), data were extracted from the article reporting the most comprehensive information. When men and women were analyzed separately in 1 article, these analyses were treated separately (even when data from a sex-combined analysis were reported).
Assessment of risk of bias and study quality
Risk of bias and study quality were assessed by 1 of the authors (KM) for each study on the basis of dietary assessment method and sample size. These items were selected from a scoring system developed by Voortman et al. (27). For the former, we considered sufficient studies in which actual dietary intake was estimated by dietary record or recall over multiple days, or dietary intake was assessed using a validated dietary assessment questionnaire. For the latter, we considered studies based on ≥200 participants to be sufficient. This (arbitrary) criterion was determined considering the sample size in previous methodologic studies [i.e., n = 111 (7) and 127 (8)], in which meaningful dietary patterns were identified using dietary information from a validated dietary assessment questionnaire and multiple-day dietary record in a homogeneous population. Studies classified sufficient for both items were considered to report high-quality data.
Synthesis of results
We first conducted a narrative synthesis of the findings from the included studies in terms of population characteristics, dietary assessment method, dietary pattern analysis, and study quality. Second, we investigated whether a number of similar dietary patterns were repeatedly identified in different studies by considering the subjective names of dietary patterns. Then, we assessed the reproducibility of major dietary patterns using congruence coefficients (CCs) between the factor loadings from each study. The CC (ranging from −1 to 1) is the preferred index for measuring the component or factor similarity extracted from PCA or factor analysis (28). A number of researchers have argued that a CC ≥0.80 is sufficient to assume that the components have a fair similarity (29, 30), whereas others maintain that a more conservative approach is required and set the cutoff point as 0.85 (31). Given the diverse populations and PCA procedures used in studies that report dietary patterns, we considered that a CC ≥0.80 would be sufficient to assume fair similarity between components.
We calculated the CC between the factor loadings of a particular pattern from 1 study (l1f) with the factor loadings of a particular pattern from another study (l2f) for each of the f = 1, …, 23 food groups as follows:
![]() |
(1) |
For this purpose, food items appearing in each study were categorized into 23 food groups (Supplemental Table 1). Grouping of foods was done a priori on the basis of similarities in nutrient profile or culinary use of the foods, mainly in accordance with the Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan (32) and the Japanese National Health and Nutrition Survey's classification of food groups (24). When low factor loading values (e.g., > −0.20 to <0.20) were not reported (for simplicity), a factor loading value of 0 was assigned. When multiple food items were available for 1 food group, we calculated the mean value of factor loadings and assigned this value. When no food item was available in a food group, we excluded the food group for the calculation of CCs. The CCs were calculated for each pair of factor loadings in each of the major dietary patterns identified, and median and 25th and 75th percentiles of CCs as well as the number and percentage of CCs ≥0.80 for each of the major dietary patterns are shown as summary statistics. These analyses were first conducted based on all data and then using high-quality data only (determined based on sample size and dietary assessment method, as mentioned above). All data management and analyses were performed by 1 of the authors (KM) using Microsoft Excel 2016 MSO and SAS statistical software (version 9.4; SAS Institute).
Results
Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the study selection process. Our electronic literature search identified 1095 records (including duplicates). After excluding 964 records by title/abstract screening, 144 full-text articles (including 13 articles identified by hand search) were assessed in detail. The number of articles considered eligible was 90. After excluding articles that reported dietary patterns based on the same dietary assessment method in (almost) the same population, 65 articles (41 English articles and 24 Japanese articles) (9, 10, 33–95) were included in this systematic review, representing 80 studies.
FIGURE 1.
Flow diagram of the study selection process. 1Reasons for exclusion were as follows: cluster analysis (n = 5), no dietary pattern analysis (n = 15), factor loading values not available (n = 5), participants from other countries (n = 5), patients (n = 7), vegetarians (n = 1), no intake data (n = 1), food combination (n = 1), ecological study (n = 1), household survey (n = 6), far from the general population (survivors of the Great East Japan Earthquake; n = 1), journal not peer reviewed (n = 2), and multiple dietary data collected from the same person into principal component analysis without considering the multiple nature of dietary data (n = 4).
Study characteristics
Basic characteristics of the 80 studies were summarized (Table 1 for studies identifying major dietary patterns, Supplemental Table 2 for studies not identifying major dietary patterns). Although the first study that met the inclusion criteria was published ∼40 y ago (in 1979), the majority of studies (n = 48; 60%) were published after 2010. More than half of the studies (n = 43; 54%) were conducted in both sexes combined, and the mean and range of participant age varied. Sample size ranged from 59 to 54,222 (median: 517), with 19 studies (24%) based on <200 participants. In terms of dietary assessment method, a validated dietary assessment questionnaire was used in more than half (n = 43; 54%) of studies (mainly recent studies), whereas multiple-day diet records were used in 24% (n = 19) of studies, most of which were older studies. Other studies used a nonvalidated diet questionnaire (n = 15) or a 1-d diet record (n = 2).
TABLE 1.
Basic characteristics of studies eligible for this systematic review on principal component analysis–derived dietary patterns in Japanese adults (studies identifying major dietary patterns)1
First author, publication year (ref) | Study year | Sex; age (range, mean, or both), y | Sample size, n | Dietary assessment method | No. of dietary patterns derived | Major dietary patterns identified | Study no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moriguchi, 1980 (35) | 1976–1979 | M/F; 20–70 | 774 (M: 366; F: 408) | 1-d DR | 6 | TRD | 3 |
Toyokawa, 1981 (36) | 1980 | F; 30–69 | 225 | 3-d DR | 9 | WTN | 4 |
Ikeda, 1982 (37) | 1980 | M/F; ≥20 | 290 (M: 40; F: 250) | 3-d DR | 7 | WTN | 5 |
Nagayama, 1995 (47) | 1978–1980 | F; 47.0 | 116 | 3-d DR | 7 | WTN | 15 |
Chi, 2003 (52) | 2001 | M/F; 40–79 (63) | 1308 (M: 463; F: 845) | FFQ (not validated) | 3 | PRD, WTN | 20 |
Kim, 2004 (54) | 1990 | M; 40–59 | 20,300 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | HLH, TRD, WTN | 22a |
F; 40–59 | 21,812 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | HLH, TRD, WTN | 22b | ||
Mizoue, 2005 (55) | 1999–2002 | M; 52.4 | 1341 | FFQ (partly validated) | 3 | JPN | 23 |
Okubo, 2006 (56) | 2000–2003 | F; 40–55 (46.4) | 291 | DHQ (validated) | 4 | HLH, TRDJ, WTN | 24 |
Okubo, 2007 (57) | 2005 | F; 18–20 (18.1) | 3770 | DHQ (validated) | 4 | HLH, TRDJ, WTN | 25 |
Shimazu, 2007 (58) | 1994 | M/F; 40–79 | 40,547 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | JPN | 26 |
Nanri, 2008 (59) | 2004–2006 | M/F; 50–74 | 7802 (M: 3276; F: 4526) | FFQ (partly validated) | 4 | HLH, WTN | 27 |
Sadakane, 2008 (60) | 1992–1995 | M/F; 40–69 (M: 56.3; F: 56.6) | 8057 (M: 3148; F: 4909) | FFQ (partly validated) | 3 | WTN | 28 |
Kurotani, 2010 (61) | 2000–2003 | M/F; M: 60.1; F: 60.5 | 775 (M: 485; F: 290) | FFQ (validated) | 3 | PRD | 29 |
Monma, 2010 (62) | 2002 | M/F; ≥70 | 877 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | TRDJ | 30 |
Nanri, 2010 (63) | 2006 | M/F; 21–67 | 521 (M: 309; F: 212) | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | JPN, WTN | 31 |
Okubo, 2010 (9) | 2002–2003 | F; 31–69 (49.6) | 92 | DHQ (validated) | 3 | HLH, WTN, TRDJ | 32a |
16-d DR | 3 | HLH, TRDJ, WTN | 32b | ||||
M; 32–76 (52.8) | 92 | DHQ (validated) | 2 | HLH, WTN | 32c | ||
16-d DR | 2 | HLH, WTN | 32d | ||||
Arisawa, 2011 (64) | 2002–2007 | M/F; 15–73 (43.8)2 | 1656 (M: 755; F: 901)2 | FFQ (not validated) | 5 | HLH | 33 |
Kumeta, 2011 (66) | 2008 | M/F; 20–86 (56.3) | 763 (M: 288; F: 475) | FFQ (not validated) | 5 | TRDJ | 35 |
Nanri, 2011 (67) | 2005–2007 | M; 40–69 (55.7) | 3905 | FFQ (validated) | 5 | HLH, WTN | 36a |
F; 40–69 (55.1) | 5640 | FFQ (validated) | 5 | HLH, WTN | 36b | ||
Ogawa, 2011 (68) | NR | M/F; ≥65 (71.3) | 80 (M: 19; F: 61) | BDHQ (validated) | 4 | JPN, WTN | 37 |
Morimoto, 2012 (69) | 1990–1992 | M/F; 40–69 | 5665 (M: 1995; F: 3670) | FFQ (not validated) | 3 | HLH | 38 |
Nanri, 2012 (10) | 1994–1998 | M; 40–69 | 244 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | PRD, WTN, TRD | 39a |
28- or 14-d DR | 3 | PRD, WTN, TRD | 39b | ||||
F; 40–69 | 254 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | PRD, WTN, TRD | 39c | ||
28- or 14-d DR | 3 | PRD, WTN, TRD | 39d | ||||
Sugawara, 2012 (70) | 2011 | M/F; 22–86 | 791 (M: 303; F: 488) | BDHQ (validated) | 4 | HLH, WTN | 40 |
Yap, 2012 (71) | NR | M/F; 30–65 (43.0) | 136 (M: 94; F: 42) | FFQ (validated) | 2 | JPN, WTN | 41 |
Konishi, 2013 (73) | 2011 | F; 20.2 | 59 | 3-d DR | 4 | HLH, JPN, TRD | 43 |
Nanri, 2013 (75) | 1995 or 1998 | M; 45–74 | 47,408 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | PRD, WTN, TRD | 45a |
F; 45–74 | 54,222 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | PRD, WTN, TRD | 45b | ||
Suzuki, 2013 (76) | NR | M/F; 21–65 (43.4) | 2266 (M: 2025; F: 241) | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | JPN, WTN | 46 |
Arisawa, 2014 (77) | 2008–2011 | M/F; 35–70 | 513 (M: 377; F: 136) | FFQ (validated) | 4 | PRD, WTN | 47 |
Tomata, 2014 (79) | 2006 | M/F; ≥65 (73.9) | 14,260 | FFQ (validated) | 3 | JPN | 49 |
Kashino, 2015 (80) | 2009 | M/F; 20–65 | 509 (M: 296; F: 213) | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | JPN, WTN | 50 |
Kurotani, 2015 (81) | 2012–2013 | M/F; 18–70 | 2108 (M: 1883; F: 225) | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | HLH, WTN, TRDJ | 51 |
Satake, 2015 (82) | 2013 | M/F; 54 | 993 (M: 382; F: 611) | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | HLH, WTN | 52 |
Fujii, 2016 (85) | 2013 | M/F; 18–63 (20.2) | 240 (M: 61; F: 179) | FFQ (not validated) | 3 | JPN, WTN | 55 |
Nanri, 2016 (88) | 2005–2008 | M/F; 35–69 | 1720 (M: 955; F: 765) | FFQ (validated) | 4 | HLH, WTN | 58 |
Niu, 2016 (89) | 2008 | M; ∼43 | 735 | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | JPN | 59a |
F; ∼42 | 245 | BDHQ (validated) | 3 | JPN | 59b | ||
Htun, 2017 (91) | 2012 | M/F; 20–84 | 11,365 (M: 4686; F: 6679) | 1-d DR | 3 | TRDJ, WTN | 61 |
Osawa, 2017 (95) | NR | M/F; 87.8 | 512 (M: 224; F: 288) | BDHQ (validated) | 2 | TRDJ | 65 |
Articles are sorted by publication year followed by alphabetical order of the first author. BDHQ, brief diet history questionnaire; DHQ, diet history questionnaire; DR, dietary record; HLH, healthy; JPN, Japanese; NR, not reported; PRD, prudent; ref, reference; TRD, traditional; TRDJ, traditional Japanese; WTN, Western.
Including 62 individuals aged 15–19 y.
Dietary pattern analysis strategy
To determine the number of factors in PCA, ≥1 of the following criteria was used in 59 (74%) studies: eigenvalue (generally a 1.0 cutoff), scree plot, and interpretability of the factors (Supplemental Table 3). PCA was conducted by using the correlation matrix of food intake variables in all studies. Varimax rotation was preferred to Promax rotation (53 compared with 6 studies). The number of food items included in PCA ranged from 7 to 52 (median: 30). The majority of studies (n = 49; 61%) assessed the whole diet; others did not consider at least some part of diet, such as alcoholic beverages and staple foods (i.e., rice, bread, and noodles), whereas 2 studies were based on only a limited number of aggregated food items. Log-transformed food intake variables were used in 12 studies (15%), whereas energy-adjusted food intake variables were used in 24 studies (30%). Naming of factors was conducted based on food items with high factor loadings in 51 studies (64%), whereas somewhat objective cutoff values were used in 2 studies (e.g., foods with factor loadings >0.30 or < −0.30).
Major dietary patterns
The number of dietary patterns derived in each study ranged from 2 to 9 (median: 3). In total, 285 different dietary patterns (including 50 patterns without any name) were derived in 80 studies (Supplemental Table 4). On the basis of the names of these patterns, the major dietary patterns were as follows (Table 1): Western (n = 34), Japanese (n = 12), traditional (n = 10), traditional Japanese (n = 9), healthy (n = 18), and prudent (n = 9) patterns (for each of these patterns, factor loading values of the selected 23 food groups calculated on the basis of original factor loadings in each of the studies are shown in Supplemental Tables 5–10, respectively). Considering the median factor loading values of the 23 food groups (Table 2), the Western pattern was characterized by higher intakes of fats, oils, bread, meat, and seasonings, whereas the Japanese pattern was characterized by higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, potatoes, vegetables, pickles, pulses, seasonings, fruits, and fish and shellfish. The traditional pattern was characterized by a higher intake of pickles only, whereas the traditional Japanese pattern was characterized by higher intakes of rice and pulses and a lower intake of bread. Both the healthy and prudent patterns were characterized by higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, vegetables, potatoes, fruits, and pulses. When only high-quality data were assessed (after excluding studies with a sample size <200 or use of a nonvalidated diet questionnaire or 1-d dietary record), similar characteristics were observed, with some exceptions (no contribution of fats to the Western pattern, no contribution of seasonings to the Japanese pattern, a lower fat intake as a characteristic of traditional pattern, and a higher intake of pickles as a characteristic of the healthy pattern).
TABLE 2.
Factor loadings for major dietary patterns in Japanese adults1
Western | Japanese | Traditional | Traditional Japanese | Healthy | Prudent | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All data2 | High-quality data only3 | All data2 | High-quality data only3 | All data2 | High-quality data only3 | All data2 | High-quality data only3 | All data2 | High-quality data only3 | All data2 | High-quality data only3 | |
No. of studies | 34 | 24 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 18 | 11 | 9 | 8 |
Rice | −0.26 | −0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.60* | 0.64* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Bread | 0.35* | 0.34* | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.15 | −0.15 | −0.39* | −0.43* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Noodles | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Potatoes | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56* | 0.53* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.51* | 0.55* | 0.57* | 0.57* |
Pulses | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36* | 0.36* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38* | 0.37* | 0.39* | 0.39* | 0.59* | 0.51* |
Nuts | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
Fruits | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31* | 0.28 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.49* | 0.42* | 0.55* | 0.54* |
Mushrooms | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67* | 0.63* | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61* | 0.62* | 0.58* | 0.58* |
Seaweeds | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59* | 0.57* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.56* | 0.55* | 0.61* | 0.61* |
Vegetables | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.56* | 0.56* | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.59* | 0.59* | 0.60* | 0.62* |
Pickles | −0.15 | −0.17 | 0.43* | 0.41* | 0.60* | 0.60* | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.30* | 0.27 | 0.27 |
Meat | 0.35* | 0.35* | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.09 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
Fish and shellfish | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30* | 0.30* | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
Eggs | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
Dairy products | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
Confectioneries | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.28 | −0.05 | −0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.22 |
Fats | 0.39* | 0.19 | 0.00 | −0.04 | −0.10 | −0.42* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.07 |
Oils | 0.39* | 0.31* | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.21 |
Seasonings | 0.30* | 0.41* | 0.34* | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
Soups | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
Alcoholic beverages | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.03 | −0.03 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.08 | 0.00 | −0.01 | −0.01 |
Nonalcoholic and caloric beverages | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Nonalcoholic and noncaloric beverages | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Values are medians unless otherwise indicated. *Factor loadings with an absolute value ≥0.30.
All relevant studies were included: studies 3–5, 15, 20, 22a, 22b, 23–31, 32a–d, 33, 35, 36a, 36b, 37, 38, 39a–d, 40, 41, 43, 45a, 45b, 46, 47, 49–52, 55, 58, 59a, 59b, 61, and 65 (see Table 1).
Studies with low quality (i.e., sample size <200 or use of a nonvalidated dietary assessment questionnaire or only 1-d dietary data; studies 3, 15, 20, 32a–d, 33, 35, 37, 38, 41, 43, 55, and 61) were excluded (see Table 1).
Reproducibility of major dietary patterns
We assessed reproducibility of these major dietary patterns by calculating the CC for each pair of the same dietary patterns. When all data were used, the median values of CCs ranged from 0.41 (traditional pattern) to 0.81 (healthy and prudent patterns) (Table 3). Based on high-quality data only, the median CCs were still low for the Western (0.44), traditional (0.59), and traditional Japanese (0.31) patterns. Conversely, those for the Japanese (0.80), healthy (0.89), and prudent (0.86) patterns were ≥0.80 and the proportion of pairs with a CC ≥0.80 was 50.0%, 87.3%, and 64.3%, respectively.
TABLE 3.
Congruence coefficients for major dietary patterns in Japanese adults
Western | Japanese | Traditional | Traditional Japanese | Healthy | Prudent | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | |
No. of pairs | 561 | 276 | 66 | 28 | 45 | 28 | 36 | 10 | 153 | 55 | 36 | 28 |
Median | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.86 |
25th percentile | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
75th percentile | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
≥0.8 | ||||||||||||
n | 15 | 13 | 21 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 84 | 48 | 18 | 18 |
% | 2.7 | 4.7 | 31.8 | 50.0 | 8.9 | 14.3 | 2.8 | 10.0 | 54.9 | 87.3 | 50.0 | 64.3 |
All relevant studies were included: studies 3–5, 15, 20, 22a, 22b, 23–31, 32a–d, 33, 35, 36a, 36b, 37, 38, 39a–d, 40, 41, 43, 45a, 45b, 46, 47, 49–52, 55, 58, 59a, 59b, 61, and 65 (see Table 1).
Studies with low quality (i.e., sample size <200 or use of a nonvalidated dietary assessment questionnaire or only 1-d dietary data; studies 3, 15, 20, 32a–d, 33, 35, 37, 38, 41, 43, 55, and 61) were excluded (see Table 1).
Because of the apparent similarity of the healthy, prudent, and Japanese patterns, at least with regard to median factor loading values, we further calculated CCs between these dietary patterns. For the healthy and prudent patterns (based on high-quality data), the median CC was 0.84 and the percentage of pairs with a CC ≥0.80 was 69.3% (Table 4). The corresponding values were 0.85 and 78.4% for the Japanese and healthy patterns and 0.82 and 59.4% for the Japanese and prudent patterns.
TABLE 4.
Congruence coefficients for healthy and prudent patterns, Japanese and healthy patterns, and Japanese and prudent patterns in Japanese adults
Healthy vs. prudent | Japanese vs. healthy | Japanese vs. prudent | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | All data1 | High-quality data only2 | |
No. of pairs | 162 | 88 | 216 | 88 | 108 | 64 |
Median | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.82 |
25th percentile | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.73 |
75th percentile | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.87 |
≥0.8 | ||||||
n | 81 | 61 | 96 | 69 | 43 | 38 |
% | 50.0 | 69.3 | 44.4 | 78.4 | 39.8 | 59.4 |
All relevant studies were included: studies 20, 22a, 22b, 23–27, 29, 31, 32a–d, 33, 36a, 36b, 37, 38, 39a–d, 40, 41, 43, 45a, 45b, 46, 47, 49–52, 55, 58, 59a, and 59b (see Table 1).
Studies with low quality (i.e., sample size <200 or use of a nonvalidated dietary assessment questionnaire or only 1-d dietary data; studies 20, 32a–d, 33, 37, 38, 41, 43, and 55) were excluded (see Table 1).
Discussion
In this systematic review of 80 dietary pattern studies in Japan, we identified 6 major dietary patterns: Western, Japanese, traditional, traditional Japanese, healthy, and prudent patterns. However, characteristics of the Western, traditional, and traditional Japanese patterns varied considerably across studies and their reproducibility as assessed by CCs was low. In contrast, the Japanese, healthy, and prudent patterns appeared to have a number of characteristics in common, such as higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, vegetables, potatoes, fruits, pulses, and pickles. Moreover, these patterns were somewhat reproducible across studies. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to identify major dietary patterns within a country and to assess their reproducibility using CCs.
In previous studies, the healthy and prudent patterns were characterized by high intakes of fruits, vegetables (including mushrooms), poultry, fish, low-fat dairy, legumes, and whole grains (18, 19, 96, 97). The healthy and prudent patterns observed here (characterized by high intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, vegetables, potatoes, fruits, and pulses) were generally similar, but several additional features warrant mention. One was a high intake of seaweeds and potatoes, which has been observed in the Korean dietary pattern (98, 99) and is probably due to the fact that these foods are frequently cooked or consumed with vegetables in East Asian countries. Furthermore, high intakes of whole grains and low-fat dairy were not characteristics of these dietary patterns, mainly because intakes of these foods are generally very low in Japan (100). Another interesting feature was the lack of any apparent contribution of poultry (chicken) to these patterns, which is at variance with results from other East Asian countries such as Korea (98, 99) and China (101). These may be unique characteristics of healthy or prudent patterns in Japan, and should be considered, for example, in the development of food-based dietary guidelines or recommendations.
The Japanese pattern (characterized by higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, potatoes, vegetables, pickles, pulses, seasonings, fruits, and fish and shellfish) had many characteristics in common with the healthy and prudent patterns. Because the term “Japanese” is rather qualitative (as mentioned below), the naming is clearly misleading, because it at least partly reflects researchers’ perception that the Japanese diet is healthy (102–104). Accordingly, this pattern should more likely have been labeled as a healthy or prudent pattern.
The healthy, prudent, and Japanese dietary patterns were similar in terms of factor loading values but reproducibility within and between them (as assessed by CCs) was also considerably high. This is generally consistent with a series of studies conducted by 1 research group, which found that major dietary patterns in different samples extracted from similar populations were fairly reproducible (13, 14). In addition, this finding does not conflict with previous perceptions that healthy and prudent patterns are interchangeable (18, 19, 96, 97), although it might be better to consistently use either of the terms (healthy or prudent) in future research. It would be of interest to investigate if the present findings in Japan would also be observed in different countries or globally.
Although previous studies have generally characterized the Western dietary pattern by high intakes of red meat, processed meat, refined grains, sweets, sugary drinks, eggs, potatoes, high-fat dairy products, and fried foods (18, 19, 96, 97), the Western pattern observed was, on average, characterized by higher intakes of fats, oils, bread, meat, and seasonings. Thus, the Western pattern in Japan seems to reflect only a part of the globally observed Western pattern, and researchers should be careful not to assume that a Western pattern is similar across different countries. In addition, the reproducibility of the Western pattern was poor, suggesting that this pattern varies considerably across populations in Japan. The same was observed for both the traditional (characterized by a high intake of pickles) and traditional Japanese (characterized by high intakes of rice and pulses and a low intake of bread) patterns. This may be primarily due to the use of such terms. The terms “Western,” “traditional,” and “traditional Japanese” (and “Japanese”) are rather qualitative and provide little or no information about the food or nutrient composition of the patterns. It would therefore be preferable if patterns were named more quantitatively (3).
Interestingly, unlike the general perception that rice is a major feature of diets in Japan (102–104), this food group did not contribute to any of the major dietary patterns perceived as somewhat healthy (i.e., healthy, prudent, and Japanese patterns) but rather only to the traditional Japanese pattern. This may be due to the high intake of rice by many people in Japan (24), which, compared with other foods, does not allow individual diets to be discriminated from each other in terms of healthfulness. In addition, other staple foods (i.e., bread and noodles) also failed to contribute to these somewhat healthy dietary patterns. These findings raise the important question of how the food-based dietary guidelines in Japan should treat these food groups.
The primary strengths of our present review are its inclusion of articles in both the English and Japanese languages, its investigation of PCA-derived dietary patterns in Japan, and its assessment of the reproducibility of patterns using CCs. Our results serve as both a reference and an indication for further research, as well as for the development of food-based dietary guidelines. Among other strengths, the review also benefited from a comprehensive search strategy and the use of 2 independent literature searches.
However, there are several limitations of this review. First, despite our use of wide search terms, search in several relevant databases, and hand-search of reference lists, it is possible that we did not capture all relevant publications. Second, when we regrouped the food items into 23 food groups to calculate CCs for major dietary patterns, we had to subjectively decide the number and classification of these food groups. Thus, it is possible that a different number and classification of food groups might have resulted in somewhat different results. In additon, when a factor loading value for a given food item was not reported in individual studies (for simplicity), the value of 0 was assumed, and when no food item was available for a food group we created, this food group was not considered in the calculation of CCs. Both of these procedures likely contributed to the overestimation of reproducibility. Third, the 3 dietary patterns that showed fair reproducibility (based on high-quality data) were derived from a rather limited number of publications (n = 9 for healthy, 4 for prudent, and 7 for Japanese patterns) or research groups (n = 4 for healthy, 3 for prudent, and 4 for Japanese patterns), which may also have contributed to the overestimation of reproducibility. Nevertheless, these factors should not explain the different findings between the healthy, prudent, and Japanese patterns and the Western, traditional, and traditional Japanese patterns. Fourth, although we considered a CC ≥0.80 as an indication of fair similarity for the assessment of reproducibility, based on several previous studies (29, 30), a more conservative cutoff point (≥0.85) has also been suggested (31). In addition, although we considered that the healthy, prudent, and Japanese patterns were relatively reproducible based on median CCs ≥0.80 (based on high-quality data), when we examined CCs of each of the pairs, at most one-half (not all) of pairs of the healthy, prudent, and Japanese patterns showed values ≥0.80. If the more conservative cutoff point (CC ≥0.85) was applied, only the healthy pattern would be deemed reproducible. Nevertheless, given the diversity of the populations and PCA procedures in dietary pattern studies, we consider that our decision and conclusions are reasonable. Finally, although the present systematic review focused on only PCA, dietary patterns can also be estimated using other a posteriori approaches (e.g., cluster analysis). It would thus be of interest to systematically examine whether dietary patterns derived from other approaches are similar and comparable to PCA-derived dietary patterns, although it is beyond the scope of this review.
In conclusion, this systematic review of 80 dietary pattern studies in Japan identified 6 major dietary patterns: Western, Japanese, traditional, traditional Japanese, healthy, and prudent patterns. However, characteristics of the Western, traditional, and traditional Japanese patterns varied considerably across studies; and reproducibility as assessed by CCs was low. Conversely, the Japanese, healthy, and prudent patterns seemed to have such characteristics in common as higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, vegetables, potatoes, fruits, pulses, and pickles. In addition, these patterns were somewhat reproducible across studies. Thus, this systematic review and quantitative analysis provides empirical evidence that it cannot be assumed that dietary patterns with the same or similar name do not necessarily have the same or similar patterns, at least for some patterns. Consequently, it may be reasonable to consider that the generalizability of findings from previous dietary pattern studies is limited (at least for some dietary patterns). This review also highlights the importance of publication of information on food grouping and factor loadings, in addition to careful naming of patterns, to allow for the assessment of reproducibility or similarity. Whether the present findings are country specific or reproducible in other countries and globally awaits future studies.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—KM: formulated the research question; developed the systematic review protocol; conducted the systematic review; collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data; prepared the first draft of the manuscript; and had primary responsibility for the final content; NS, AF, XY, AH, HF, and H-CW: conducted the systematic review; MBEL: provided critical input into the final draft of the manuscript; SS: contributed to the formulation of the research question and the systematic review protocol, conduct of the systematic review, and data interpretation and assisted in the writing of the manuscript; and all authors: read and approved the final manuscript.
Notes
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency or commercial or not-for-profit sector.
Author disclosures: KM, NS, AF, XY, AH, HF, H-CW, MBEL, and SS, no conflicts of interest.
Supplemental Tables 1–10 are available from the “Supplementary data” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at https://academic.oup.com/advances/.
References
- 1. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13:3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kant AK. Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:615–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Newby PK, Tucker KL. Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev. 2004;62:177–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jacques PF, Tucker KL. Are dietary patterns useful for understanding the role of diet in chronic disease?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:1–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Martinez ME, Marshall JR, Sechrest L. Invited commentary: factor analysis and the search for objectivity. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:17–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Slattery ML, Boucher KM. The senior authors' response: factor analysis as a tool for evaluating eating patterns. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:20–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Khani BR, Ye W, Terry P, Wolk A. Reproducibility and validity of major dietary patterns among Swedish women assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. J Nutr. 2004;134:1541–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hu FB, Rimm E, Smith-Warner SA, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Sampson L, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:243–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Okubo H, Murakami K, Sasaki S, Kim MK, Hirota N, Notsu A, Fukui M, Date C. Relative validity of dietary patterns derived from a self-administered diet history questionnaire using factor analysis among Japanese adults. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:1080–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nanri A, Shimazu T, Ishihara J, Takachi R, Mizoue T, Inoue M, Tsugane S. Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed by a food frequency questionnaire used in the 5-year follow-up survey of the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study. J Epidemiol. 2012;22:205–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Borland SE, Robinson SM, Crozier SR, Inskip HM. Stability of dietary patterns in young women over a 2-year period. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;62:119–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Weismayer C, Anderson JG, Wolk A. Changes in the stability of dietary patterns in a study of middle-aged Swedish women. J Nutr. 2006;136:1582–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Castelló A, Lope V, Vioque J, Santamariña C, Pedraz-Pingarrón C, Abad S, Ederra M, Salas-Trejo D, Vidal C, Sánchez-Contador C et al.. Reproducibility of data-driven dietary patterns in two groups of adult Spanish women from different studies. Br J Nutr. 2016;116:734–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Castelló A, Buijsse B, Martín M, Ruiz A, Casas AM, Baena-Cañada JM, Pastor-Barriuso R, Antolín S, Ramos M, Munoz M et al.. Evaluating the applicability of data-driven dietary patterns to independent samples with a focus on measurement tools for pattern similarity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116:1914–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. McEvoy CT, Cardwell CR, Woodside JV, Young IS, Hunter SJ, McKinley MC. A posteriori dietary patterns are related to risk of type 2 diabetes: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1759–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rezagholizadeh F, Djafarian K, Khosravi S, Shab-Bidar S. A posteriori healthy dietary patterns may decrease the risk of central obesity: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Res. 2017;41:1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jannasch F, Kröger J, Schulze MB. Dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Nutr. 2017;147:1174–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rodríguez-Monforte M, Flores-Mateo G, Sánchez E. Dietary patterns and CVD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Br J Nutr. 2015;114:1341–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rodríguez-Monforte M, Sánchez E, Barrio F, Costa B, Flores-Mateo G. Metabolic syndrome and dietary patterns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56:925–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lai JS, Hiles S, Bisquera A, Hure AJ, McEvoy M, Attia J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary patterns and depression in community-dwelling adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:181–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sasaki S. The value of the National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan. Lancet. 2011;378:1205–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ikeda N, Saito E, Kondo N, Inoue M, Ikeda S, Satoh T, Wada K, Stickley A, Katanoda K, Mizoue T et al.. What has made the population of Japan healthy?. Lancet. 2011;378:1094–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, Andrews KG, Engell RE, Mozaffarian D. Global, regional and national consumption of major food groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys worldwide. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Office of Nutrition, Cancer Measures and Health Promotion Division, Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. [The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan, 2012.] Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; 2014; (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Voortman T, Vitezova A, Bramer WM, Ars CL, Bautista PK, Buitrago-Lopez A, Felix JF, Leermakers ET, Sajjad A, Sedaghat S et al.. Effects of protein intake on blood pressure, insulin sensitivity and blood lipids in children: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2015;113:383–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Haven S, Berge J. Tucker's Coefficient Congruence as a Measure of Factorial Invariance: An Empirical Study. Heymans Bulletin No. 290 EX. Groningen (Netherlands): University of Groningen; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Horn JL, Wanberg KW, Appel M. On the internal structure of the MMPI. Multivariate Behav Res. 1973;8:131–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Griffin RW. A longitudinal investigation of task characteristics relationships. Acad Manage J. 1981;24:88–113. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lorenzo-Seva U, ten Berge JMF. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology. 2006;2:57–64. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Council for Science and Technology. [Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan.] 5th revised and enlarged ed. Tokyo: National Printing Bureau; 2005; (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bando K, Masuyama T, Kanda K, Tanabe S, Okabe M, Ino T, Takashima S, Hata M, Matsuoka A, Iha S [A trial of the quantitative analysis for investigating the condition of dietary lives.] Jpn J Nutr. 1979;37:261–74. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 34. Iizumi H, Sakabe K, Kotake Y, Tasaki T, Amemiya T [Trial of a multivariate analysis of food consumption structure: extraction of principal patterns of the food consumption and grouping of individuals.] Jpn J Public Health. 1980;27:543–51. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 35. Moriguchi S, Kishino Y, Onoda H [On food intake and physiological status of farmers in Tokushima Prefecture.] J Jpn Soc Nutr Food Sci. 1980;33:335–41. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 36. Toyokawa H, Marui E, Onoda H, Kimura N, Yoshida S, Kaneko S, Yamagami M, Nagayama I, Akabane M, Nishioka Y et al.[Food consumption pattern of women aged 30–69 in Tokyo suburban area.] J Jpn Soc Nutr Food Sci. 1981;34:531–43. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ikeda J, Asano H, Kimura M, Nagata H [Statistical methods for grasping the characteristics of food intakes of a group of people (analysis of foods intakes of four different groups of people by multivariate analysis).] Jpn J Public Health. 1982;29:616–25. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 38. Katayose M, Inoue H [Dietary pattern of women (20–50 years old) in coastal district of Goto in Nagasaki.] Jpn J Nutr. 1983;41:227–37. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 39. Imaki M, Miyoshi T, Tamura T, Hori Y, Tomita T, Nakamura T, Tanada M, Kitajouji M, Itou S [Relationships between serum cholinesterase activity and energy intake and food intake pattern.] Jpn J Health Hum Ecol. 1986;52:190–5.(in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 40. Imaki M, Miyoshi T, Yoshimura T, Tamura T, Nakamura T, Tanada M, Hori Y [Relationship between serum MAO activity and the pattern of food intake in healthy young men.] Med Biol. 1987;114:337–40. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 41. Imaki M, Miyoshi T, Matsumoto K, Tanada S. Relationship between serum lactase dehydrogenase and the pattern of food intakes in Japanese. Jpn J Health Hum Ecol. 1988;54:24–9. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Suyama Y, Haga H, Shibata H, Matsuzaki T, Suzuki K. [Correlates with pattern of food intake in the community elderly.] Jpn J Gerontol. 1989;11:264–82. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 43. Imaki M, Miyoshi T, Tanada S, Murai Y, Tanada M. Study on evaluation of liver function tests—studies on the relationship between the serum transaminase activities and the pattern of food intake. J Jpn Assoc Rural Med. 1990;39:85–9. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Imaki M, Miyoshi T, Murai Y, Takahashi H, Tanada S [Relationship between serum OCT activity and nutrient intake pattern.] J Jpn Assoc Rural Med. 1990;38:1034–6. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kumagai S, Shibata H, Suyama Y [Factors relating to patterns of food intake by the middle-aged and elderly living in a semi-urban community.] Jpn J Gerontol. 1992;14:24–33. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kumagai S, Shibata H, Watanabe S, Amano H, Suzuki T, Nagai H, Haga H, Yasumura S [Relationship of dietary patterns to change in functional capacity (intellectual activities) in the community dwelling elderly.] Jpn J Gerontol. 1995;16:146–55. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 47. Nagayama I, Nishikawa H, Yasutake R, Shirota T, Kaneko S [Changes of dietary habits of middle-aged or older women in rural and suburban areas in 1980s—a follow-up study on the food intake patterns in 1970 and 1989.] Jpn J Health Hum Ecol. 1995;61:179–94. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 48. Nagayama I, Notsu A, Noda H, Otsuka Y [Relationship between dietary fiber intake and food intake patterns of the general population, evaluated by a regional nutrition survey.] Jpn J Public Health. 1998;45:634–44.(in Japanese with English abstract). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kumagai S, Shibata H, Watanabe S, Suzuki T, Haga H. Effect of food intake pattern on all-cause mortality in the community elderly: a 7-year longitudinal study. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3:29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Nakamura M, Whitlock G, Aoki N, Nakashima T, Hoshino T, Yokoyama T, Morioka S, Kawamura T, Tanaka H, Hashimoto T et al.. Japanese and Western diet and risk of idiopathic sudden deafness: a case-control study using pooled controls. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:608–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Suyama Y.[Subjective health status and food consumption patterns in Japanese workers] [the first review author's translation]. J Health Welfare Stat. 2002;49:10–7. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 52. Chi D, Nakano M, Yamamoto K. Correlates of serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a community-based study of middle-aged and older men and women in Japan. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2003;15:17–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Uchida K, Tomonou M, Hayashi M, Shirota T [Relationships of the nutritional intake and other factors with the bone mineral density among elderly residents of Hisayama.] Jpn J Nutr Diet. 2003;61:307–15. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kim MK, Sasaki S, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S. Prospective study of three major dietary patterns and risk of gastric cancer in Japan. Int J Cancer. 2004;110:435–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Mizoue T, Yamaji T, Tabata S, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu E, Mineshita M, Ogawa S, Kono S. Dietary patterns and colorectal adenomas in Japanese men: the Self-Defense Forces Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:338–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Okubo H, Sasaki S, Horiguchi H, Oguma E, Miyamoto K, Hosoi Y, Kim MK, Kayama F. Dietary patterns associated with bone mineral density in premenopausal Japanese farmwomen. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:1185–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Okubo H, Sasaki S, Murakami K, Kim MK, Takahashi Y, Hosoi Y, Itabashi M. Dietary patterns associated with functional constipation among Japanese women aged 18 to 20 years: a cross-sectional study. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2007;53:232–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shimazu T, Kuriyama S, Hozawa A, Ohmori K, Sato Y, Nakaya N, Nishino Y, Tsubono Y, Tsuji I. Dietary patterns and cardiovascular disease mortality in Japan: a prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:600–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Nanri A, Yoshida D, Yamaji T, Mizoue T, Yakayanagi R, Kono S. Dietary patterns and C-reactive protein in Japanese men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1488–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sadakane A, Tsutsumi A, Gotoh T, Ishikawa S, Ojima T, Kario K, Nakamura Y, Kayaba K. Dietary patterns and levels of blood pressure and serum lipids in a Japanese population. J Epidemiol. 2008;18:58–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kurotani K, Budhathoki S, Joshi AM, Yin G, Toyomura K, Kono S, Mibu R, Tanaka M, Kakeji Y, Maehara Y et al.. Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer in a Japanese population: the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:1703–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Monma Y, Niu K, Iwasaki K, Tomita N, Nakaya N, Hozawa A, Kuriyama S, Takayama S, Seki T, Takeda T et al.. Dietary patterns associated with fall-related fracture in elderly Japanese: a population based prospective study. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Nanri A, Kimura Y, Matsushita Y, Ohta M, Sato M, Mishima N, Sasaki S, Mizoue T. Dietary patterns and depressive symptoms among Japanese men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:832–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Arisawa K, Uemura H, Hiyoshi M, Kitayama A, Takami H, Sawachika F, Nishioka Y, Hasegawa M, Tanto M, Satoh H et al.. Dietary patterns and blood levels of PCDDs, PCDFs, and dioxin-like PCBs in 1656 Japanese individuals. Chemosphere. 2011;82:656–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kodama S, Furuhata T, Honda K, Tosaka M, Manaka Y, Kano K, Nakamura K [Marginal micronutrient deficiency among menopausal women: assessment of dietary variety and dietary quality.] Med Biol. 2011;155:661–9. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 66. Kumeta K, Danjo K, Matsuzaka M, Takahashi I, Watanabe K, Iwane K, Tsuya R, Umeda T, Sato K, Fukuda S et al.. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and its relation to lifestyle and depression quotient in a Japanese general population. Hirosaki Med J. 2011;62:144–65. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Nanri H, Nakamura K, Hara M, Higaki Y, Imaizumi T, Taguchi N, Sakamoto T, Horita M, Shinchi K, Tanaka K. Association between dietary pattern and serum C-reactive protein in Japanese men and women. J Epidemiol. 2011;21:122–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ogawa K, Kotani Y, Sinkai S, Abe S [Salivary immunoglobulin A is associated with diseases, food intake patterns, and physical activity.] Hum Dev All. 2011;1:42–53. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 69. Morimoto A, Ohno Y, Tatsumi Y, Mizuno S, Watanabe S. Effects of healthy dietary pattern and other lifestyle factors on incidence of diabetes in a rural Japanese population. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21:601–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Sugawara N, Yasui-Furukori N, Tsuchimine S, Kaneda A, Tsuruga K, Iwane K, Okubo N, Takahashi I, Kaneko S. No association between dietary patterns and depressive symptoms among a community-dwelling population in Japan. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2012;11:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Yap RW, Shidoji Y, Hon WM, Masaki M. Association and interaction between dietary pattern and VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) gene polymorphisms on blood lipids in Chinese Malaysian and Japanese adults. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21:302–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Amano H, Yoshida H, Nishi M, Fujiwara Y, Watanabe N, Lee S, Fukaya T, Murayama H, Shinkai S, Tsuchiya Y [Prognosis and risk factors of decline in cognitive function in the elderly] [the first review author's translation]. J Health Welfare Stat. 2013;60:7–14. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 73. Konishi K, Hyakutake A, Muramatsu T [Dietary patterns and health-related QOL among female university students.] Shinshu J Public Health. 2013;7:83–94. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 74. Maruyama K, Iso H, Date C, Kikuchi S, Watanabe Y, Wada Y, Inaba Y, Tamakoshi A. Dietary patterns and risk of cardiovascular deaths among middle-aged Japanese: JACC study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23:519–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Nanri A, Shimazu T, Takachi R, Ishihara J, Mizoue T, Noda M, Inoue M, Tsugane S. Dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes in Japanese men and women: the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:18–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Suzuki T, Miyaki K, Tsutsumi A, Hashimoto H, Kawakami N, Takahashi M, Shimazu A, Inoue A, Kurioka S, Kakehashi M et al.. Japanese dietary pattern consistently relates to low depressive symptoms and it is modified by job strain and worksite supports. J Affect Disord. 2013;150:490–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Arisawa K, Uemura H, Yamaguchi M, Nakamoto M, Hiyoshi M, Sawachika F, Katsuura-Kamano S. Associations of dietary patterns with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: a cross-sectional study in a Japanese population. J Med Invest. 2014;61:333–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Fujii N, Kodama S, Watanabe T, Sakurai N, Fujiwara Y, Hoshi T [The causal structure of socioeconomic factors, three health factors in dietary patterns among suburban elderly dwellers without long-term care needs.] J Japan Mibyou Syst Assoc. 2014;20:1–8. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tomata Y, Watanabe T, Sugawara Y, Chou WT, Kakizaki M, Tsuji I. Dietary patterns and incident functional disability in elderly Japanese: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:843–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Kashino I, Nanri A, Kurotani K, Akter S, Yasuda K, Sato M, Hayabuchi H, Mizoue T. Association of dietary patterns with serum adipokines among Japanese: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J. 2015;14:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Kurotani K, Kochi T, Nanri A, Eguchi M, Kuwahara K, Tsuruoka H, Akter S, Ito R, Pham NM, Kabe I et al.. Dietary patterns and sleep symptoms in Japanese workers: the Furukawa Nutrition and Health Study. Sleep Med. 2015;16:298–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Satake R, Sugawara N, Sato K, Takahashi I, Nakaji S, Yasui-Furukori N, Fukuda S. Prevalence and predictive factors of irritable bowel syndrome in a community-dwelling population in Japan. Intern Med. 2015;54:3105–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Tsuruya K, Fukuma S, Wakita T, Ninomiya T, Nagata M, Yoshida H, Fujimi S, Kiyohara Y, Kitazono T, Uchida K et al.. Dietary patterns and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients in Japan: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yamashita E, Kumagai S, Aoki K [Relationship between the patterns of food intake and mental health in university students.] Jpn J Nutr Diet. 2015;73:2–7. (in Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 85. Fujii A, Kuwata T. Relationship between food-intake patterns and depressive states in Japanese university students. Jpn J Health Hum Ecol. 2016;82:217–27. [Google Scholar]
- 86. Fujiwara A, Asakura K, Uechi K, Masayasu S, Sasaki S. Dietary patterns extracted from the current Japanese diet and their associations with sodium and potassium intakes estimated by repeated 24 h urine collection. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:2580–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Ito T, Tanisawa K, Kawakami R, Higuchi M [Dietary patterns and nutritional assessment in middle-aged and elderly men.] Jpn J Public Health. 2016;63:653–63. (in Japanese with English abstract). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Nanri H, Nishida Y, Nakamura K, Tanaka K, Naito M, Yin G, Hamajima N, Takashima N, Suzuki S, Nindita Y et al.. Associations between dietary patterns, ADRβ2 Gln27Glu and ADRβ3 Trp64Arg with regard to serum triglyceride levels: J-MICC study. Nutrients. 2016;8:545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Niu K, Momma H, Kobayashi Y, Guan L, Chujo M, Otomo A, Ouchi E, Nagatomi R. The traditional Japanese dietary pattern and longitudinal changes in cardiovascular disease risk factors in apparently healthy Japanese adults. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55:267–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Bahari T, Uemura H, Katsuura-Kamano S, Yamaguchi M, Nakamoto M, Miki K, Sawachika F, Arisawa K. Association between dietary patterns and serum adiponectin: a cross-sectional study in a Japanese population. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2018;69:205–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Htun NC, Suga H, Imai S, Shimizu W, Takimoto H. Food intake patterns and cardiovascular risk factors in Japanese adults: analyses from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey, Japan. Nutr J. 2017;16:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Iizaka S, Nagata S, Sanada H. Nutritional status and habitual dietary intake are associated with frail skin conditions in community-dwelling older people. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21:137–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Moyama S, Minami K, Yano M, Okumura M, Hayashi S, Takayama H, Yorimoto A. Relationship between dietary patterns and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity among middle-aged adults in Japan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26:539–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Okubo H, Inagaki H, Gondo Y, Kamide K, Ikebe K, Masui Y, Arai Y, Ishizaki T, Sasaki S, Nakagawa T et al.. Association between dietary patterns and cognitive function among 70-year-old Japanese elderly: a cross-sectional analysis of the SONIC study. Nutr J. 2017;16:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Osawa Y, Arai Y, Takayama M, Hirata T, Kawasaki M, Abe Y, Iinuma T, Sasaki S, Hirose N. Identification of dietary patterns and their relationships with general and oral health in the very old. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26:262–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Brennan SF, Cantwell MM, Cardwell CR, Velentzis LS, Woodside JV. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1294–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Li F, Hou LN, Chen W, Chen PL, Lei CY, Wei Q, Tan WL, Zheng SB. Associations of dietary patterns with the risk of all-cause, CVD and stroke mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Nutr. 2015;113:16–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Shin HJ, Cho E, Lee HJ, Fung TT, Rimm E, Rosner B, Manson JE, Wheelan K, Hu FB. Instant noodle intake and dietary patterns are associated with distinct cardiometabolic risk factors in Korea. J Nutr. 2014;144:1247–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Park JE, Jung H, Lee JE. Dietary pattern and hypertension in Korean adults. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:597–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Okubo H, Sasaki S, Murakami K, Yokoyama T, Hirota N, Notsu A, Fukui M, Date C. Designing optimal food intake patterns to achieve nutritional goals for Japanese adults through the use of linear programming optimization models. Nutr J. 2015;14:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Wang D, He Y, Li Y, Luan D, Yang X, Zhai F, Ma G. Dietary patterns and hypertension among Chinese adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Gabriel AS, Ninomiya K, Uneyama H. The role of the Japanese traditional diet in healthy and sustainable dietary patterns around the world. Nutrients. 2018;10:173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Yamamoto K, E S, Hatakeyama Y, Sakamoto Y, Honma T, Jibu Y, Kawakami Y, Tsuduki T. The Japanese diet from 1975 delays senescence and prolongs life span in SAMP8 mice. Nutrition. 2016;32:122–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Sugawara S, Mizowaki Y, Iwagaki Y, Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto K, Tsuduki T. Standardisation of the Japanese diet for use in animal experiments. Br J Nutr. 2017;118:867–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.