Abstract
Background:
Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) is one of the most common noxious ante-natal conditions in humans, inducing a substantial proportion of preterm delivery and leading to a si-gnificant increase in perinatal mortality, neurological handicaps and chronic diseases in adulthood. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the postnatal consequences of FGR, with a par-ticular emphasis on the long-term consequences on respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological struc-tures and functions.
Result and Conclusion:
FGR represents a global health challenge, and efforts are urgently needed to improve our understanding of the critical factors leading to FGR and subsequent insults to the deve-loping organs.
Keywords: FGR, maternal malnutrition, neonatal brain injury, long-term handicap, perinatal mortality, diseases
1. INTRODUCTION: FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION (FGR) IS A MAJOR GLOBAL HEALTH CONCERN
Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) refers to a condition in which the fetus is unable to achieve its genetically determined potential size, responsible of increased rates of stillbirth, neonatal mortality and morbidity [1]. Multiple terms have been used to define it, as intrauterine growth restriction/retardation or small for gestational age (SGA, defined as a birth weight less then the 10th centile in the population of reference but not necesseraly associated with abnormal growth kinetic), generating confusion in terms of incidence and diagnosis. Recently, to distinguish between constitutionally small babies (SGA) and those with growth restriction, FGR has been proposed as a standard definition in scientific literature [2].
Globally, FGR affects nearly 10% of all pregnancies [2-5]. In Europe, the incidence of low birth weight infants is between 3.0% (Island) and 8.8% (Cyprus) [6]. In France, perinatal mortality and complications and long-term handicap due to FGR are responsible for costs estimated to reach about 235M€ for just the first year of care [7]. This is a public health challenge in both industrialized and developing countries [4]. Indeed, of the 135 million children born in low/middle income countries in 2010, an estimated 29.7 million were born at term following FGR and 2.8 million were born preterm and growth restricted [7].
Currently the FGR rate is the highest, in over 20 years and is likely to rise further due to the increasing number of infertility treatments, multiple pregnancies, professional workload, older motherhood and exposure to FGR-inducing agents such as stress, nicotine, malnutrition [8, 9]. Maternal malnutrition during pregnancy is a major determinant mimicking placental insufficiency and negatively affecting fetoplacental growth. Given the fact that the incidence of maternal malnutrition is higher than 10% in developing countries and accounts for a significant proportion of FGR in industrialized countries as well, it is crucial to better delineate its effect on genomic regulation, brain maturation and function.
The consequences of FGR are influenced by its severity, the gestational age at the onset (defined as early, i.e. <32 weeks gestation or late, i.e. ≥ 32 weeks gestation) [2], and the etiologies implicated (genetic, placental, maternal and fetal factors). Moreover, FGR is related to preterm delivery, leading to an increased risk of disability in surviving infants [1]. Thus, early diagnosis of FGR is very important to establish an adequate surveillance of the fetal status, minimizing risks of premature birth and intrauterine hypoxia.
This review examines the impact of FGR on the long-term function of developing organs, both in animal models and human cohorts.
2. FGR AND THE DEVELOPING LUNG
Impaired fetal nutrition and oxygen deprivation, both usually related to FGR, can modify the normal lung development at any stage (from embryonic, pseudoglandular, canalicular, saccular to alveolar), making the lung more vulnerable to postnatal insults [10].
In the past, infants born following FGR were considered to have more mature lungs, as a result of intrauterine exposition to higher levels of glucocorticoids. Conversely, cinical studies have shown that premature SGA infants are at higher risk for developing both neonatal respiratory distress and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) when compared with premature infants with a birth weight Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA) [11, 12]. Nowadays, FGR is recognized as a risk factor for BPD and its long-term consequences, as asthma and bronchiolitis [13-15]. Recent studies have identified an association between FGR and the development of wheezing at the age of 3 years [16], independently to gestational age at birth. Moreover, infants born with a FGR or a low birth weight may develop a lower lung function in the spirometry analysis performed at school age [17-19].
Different animal models have been developed to identify the mechanisms implicated in the origin and evolution of respiratory pathology in FGR. Poor fetal nutrition and oxygenation can alterate surfactant quantity and activity [20], alveolar cell proliferation and alveolar walls and air-blood barriers [21]. In preclinical studies, sheep and rats born following FGR show smaller lungs, with no evidence of postnatal catch-up [22]. Adult animals exposed to FGR have fewer [23] and larger alveoli, developing emphysema [22]. Maritz and collaborators reported an accumulation of extracellular matrix leading to an increased thickness of both septa and air-blood barrier in the sheep at 8 weeks and 2 years of age [24]. FGR is also associated with atypical elastin production, and consequent derangement of the normal architecture of the lung [25, 26]. A dysregulation of gene’s expression involving cell growth and differentiation, as IGF-1, PPAR-γ [25], and p53 [27], is responsible for increased thickness and cellularity of the pulmonary parenchyma. Furthermore, hypoxia FGR-related, affecting alveolar endothelium and VEGF pathway, could play a role in the pulmonary dysfunctions, as observed in FGR animal models [28, 29]
From these preclinical studies, promising therapeutic strategies have recently emerged. Maternal dietary supplementation in Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) can restore normal quantity of the enzyme SETD-8, which regulates cell proliferation and gene function, modifying lung development in rats [30].
3. FGR, SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION AND IMMUNITY
Recent studies have highlighted the effect of FGR on development and function of the immune system in neonates [31, 32]. Infants born following FGR demonstrate an increased vulnerability to infections [33], especially to late-onset sepsis [34, 35].
In addition to the effects on platelet count (thrombocytopenia) and red blood cells (increased number of nucleated red blood cells and polycythemia), FGR is associated with significant changes in white blood cells counts and immune response. Numbers of B and T-cells, neutrophils and levels of IgG are lower in the cord blood or thymus of FGR infants [36-38] Infants with FGR have lower numbers of T-regs (CD3+, CD4+, CD25high, and FoxP3high) and fewer functional T-regs compared to AGA infants [39] and they present as well some changes in thymus size and histopathology [31, 40]. The importance of T-regs as effectors of self-tolerance and regulators of immune activation is well characterized for primary diseases associated with autoimmunity and allergy. This may have implications for specific postnatal complications, including necrotizing enterocolitis, which disproportionately affect premature and FGR infants [41].
Some studies have focused attention on the dysregulation of immune cells response in FGR neonates. In whole blood cell cultures from FGR infants, after stimulation using lipopolysaccharide, the concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 are significantly lower [36]. Furthermore, altered cytokine profiles have been reported in newborn serum [42] and antenatally in placenta and fetus [43].
Similar findings have been reported in preclinical studies. FGR piglets present decreased T and B lymphocytes counts and proliferation in peripheral blood [44] and lower cytokine concentrations (IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, IL-1α, and IL-8) [45].
Yet conflicting data but increasing evidence support the hypothesis that FGR is a pro-inflammatory status, similar to preeclampsia [46, 47], that may induce several impairments of the developing organs. Indeed, while there is no evidence of increased cytokines levels soon after birth, severely growth restricted preterm neonates demonstrate a significant rise in the concentrations of pro-inflammatory circulating cytokines during the second postnatal week [48]. In umbilical cord serum from FGR neonates at birth, IFN-γ concentration is increased and it has been proposed as a neonatal marker of FGR [49].
A recent randomised trial has tested GM-CSF administration to infants born following FGR; although an increase of neutrophil counts, the authors report no effect on other short and long-term outcomes, in particular, no benefit on the incidence of secondary sepsis [50].
Further research is required to elucidate the physiopathological alterations implicated in the immunity and inflammation response in FGR infants. Whether the quantitative deficiency in innate immunity plays a role in adverse outcomes needs to be investigated in future trials.
4. FGR AND CARDIOVASCULAR AND METABOLIC FUNCTIONS
The oxygen and nutrients deprivation induced by placental insufficiency may result in several metabolic alterations in the neonatal period, like hypo- or hyperglycaemia, hypocalcaemia, jaundice. Large epidemiological studies have highlighted the association between FGR and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and insulin resistance (the metabolic syndrome), that ultimately lead to the premature development of cardiovascular diseases [51, 52].
FGR is responsible for changes in the structure and the physiology of developing organs, with adverse long-term consequences. This concept of fetal programming [51, 53, 54] is recognized to be the link between in utero environment and chronic diseases in adulthood. The theory of the developmental origin of health and disease (DoHaD) is hypothesized to relate the permanent epigenetic modifications induced by FGR (methylation, acetylation of DNA, histones modification) to the effects on gene expression in adulthood [55-58]. The potential adverse outcomes associated with this concept include circulatory and metabolic adaptations to spare the developing brain, short stature in children and adults, premature adrenarche, and the development of polycystic ovarian syndrome.
The reduction of β-cell mass, present in a rodent model of FGR, is correlated to an increased risk of diabetes mellitus [59]. These FGR models show a down-regulation of PDX-1 expression (a transcription factor involved in pancreatic islet development), as a result of specific alterations in DNA methylation and histone acetylation [60]. Also in humans, changes in target specific genes implicated in growth or metabolic phenotypes and genome-wide approach both demonstrated the deep impact of FGR on epigenetics [61, 62].
The risk of cardiovascular diseases observed following FGR has been related not only to the higher incidence of metabolic syndrome, but also to specific cardiovascular complications and dysfunction. Indeed, FGR has been associated to increased blood pression and heart rate [63, 64] and early atherosclerosis [65, 66]. The abnormal aortic and carotid wall thickness detected in FGR fetuses and infants could be the result of vascular remodelling beginning before birth, which may contribute to the occurrence of cardiac dysfunction during adulthood [67, 68]. The pathogenesis is still unclear, but animal models of FGR have demonstrated morphological changes in myocardium and vascular wall, with consequent myocardial dysfunction, vascular remodeling and fibrosis [69, 70].
Furthermore, the renal anatomy and function are usually impaired by FGR, as shown both in animal models, which present a reduced number of nephrons [71] and in clinical studies [72], with a greater risk of hypertension and progressive renal failure [73].
5. FGR AND THE DEVELOPING BRAIN
FGR severely affects the fetal brain development and brain functions and recent advances have highlighted this effect [74, 75]. The fetal brain is particularly vulnerable to the effects of abnormal fetal growth, that is associated to neurological disorders including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, learning and attention difficulties, neurobehavioral disabilities, and other cognitive impairments [76-78].
5.1. FGR and Neurodevelopmental Impairments
Babies born at 32-42 Gestational Weeks (GW) with a birth weight for gestational age below the 10th percentile are 4-6 times more likely to have cerebral palsy than children with a birth weight in a reference band between the 25th and 75th percentile [1]. A similar pattern is observed in those with unilateral or bilateral spasticity, as well as those with a dyskinetic or ataxic disability. In babies born at less than 32 GW, the relationship between birth weight and risk of cerebral palsy is less clear. Cerebral palsy is reported up to a 30-fold increased when FGR is associated with major birth defect [79, 80]. This is consistent with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies suggesting that approximately 75% of brain lesions associated with cerebral palsy occur in the early or middle part of the third trimester, time period usually affected in case of FGR and adverse intrauterine environment [81]. Moreover, several follow-up studies at school-aged reveal a significant association between FGR and neurodevelopmental impairments, from minor cognitive deficiencies to neuropsychological dysfunctions [76, 80, 82]. Comparison within monozygotic twin pairs at school age showed that the FGR twin is at increased risk for cognitive deficiencies, with reduced verbal IQ when compared to the other twin [83].
The neurodevelopmental consequences of FGR are related to the severity of FGR, when it began during prenatal period and the gestational age at delivery [84].
Constitent with findings reported in humans, rats with severe FGR exhibit white matter damage that persist to adulthood [85] while moderate FGR is associated with only transient hypomyelination, mild microglial activation and astrogliosis [86], with behavioural deficits noted at 8-weeks of age [87].
Preterm birth is likely to exacerbate the neurodevelopmental impairment associated with FGR [76, 88]. This is supported by the French cohort study EPIPAGE, showing that neurocognitive deficits and behavioural disorders in children born between 29 and 32 GW are significantly higher in infants with FGR, even mild, compared to infants born with normal birth weight [80]. Therefore, low birth weight has been recently proposed as a factor able to better predict the occurrence of cerebral palsy in moderate to late premature infants [89].
5.2. FGR and Cerebral Blood Flow
During prenatal chronic hypoxia, fetal blood flow is selectively redirected to the brain and to maximize oxygen and nutrient supply [90, 91]. Even if brain sparing mechanism has been initially considered protective, several studies demonstrate that fetuses with brain sparing, diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, have worse neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to FGR infants without brain sparing [78, 92-94]. In case of blood flow redistribution, improved brain perfusion is not uniform, preferentially directed in favour of basal ganglia. Other brain areas, including frontal lobe, can therefore be severely altered, leading to neurobehavioral disability [95] .
5.3. Brain Injury Induced by FGR
Brain injury following FGR is consequent to a combination of grey and white matter damage as revealed by several clinical imaging studies [96, 97].
Cortical grey matter volume in FGR infants is found reduced by 28% compared to equivalent healthy term-born infants [88]. A delayed cortical development and altered cortical gyrification is described in FGR infants soon after birth [98], and found at least up to 1 year of age with significant developmental disabilities [97]. Post-mortem analysis has detected a decreasing neuronal cells density in the developing cortex [99]. These findings are consistent with several preclinical studies [85-87, 100-105]. Disturbance in cell proliferation and migration of neurons and final neuronal loss are found also in the hippocampus [105, 106]. Interestingly, these morphological changes observed in the hippocampus and in the septo-hippocampal circuit may be responsible for impairment in hippocampal-related behaviours, such as learning and memory [107].
Furthermore, impaired myelination and abnormal connectivity are recognized as common features following FGR in (i) different animal models of placental vascular disease [105, 108], (ii) in a rat model of maternal undernutrition [109], and (iii) in human preterm infants with FGR [110, 111].
5.4. Mechanisms Underlining FGR-associated Brain Injury
Mechanisms involved in FGR-related brain damages have been explored in preclinical studies focused on excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, necrotic and apoptotic degeneration and neuroinflammation [75, 90]. Hypoxia and undernutrition activate a cascade of cellular and biochemical events that lead to immediate or delayed cell death, with potential effects on immature neurons and neuroglia [90, 91]. Rodent models of FGR have revealed glial reactions including increased microglial activation and increased density of reactive astrocytes [103, 112]. Neuroinflammation is a key factor in the disruption of oligodendroglial maturation [113] and was reported in several animal models of FGR [86, 112]. Recently, in a FGR model induced by prenatal malnutrition, transcriptomic analysis performed at birth reveals a deregulation of genes controlling neuroinflammation in both oligodendrocytes and microglia [109]. These findings support the concept of the double hit insult both in rodents and humans: the initial hit associated with the occurrence of FGR can sensitize the deleterious effects of second postnatal hits, i.e. systemic inflammation and epigenetic changes [114-116].
In order to be able to provide therapeutic intervention for the fetus or infant at risk of brain damage, it is important that FGR infants are identified timely. This can be challenging, as fetal brain injury may be initially undetectable during gestation. Advanced neuroimaging is now providing the opportunity to identify and then monitor the evolution of brain injury in compromised foetuses and neonates. Another approach would target reliable circulating markers of brain damage in pregnant women and newborns [117, 118].
CONCLUSION
FGR is a leading cause of neonatal morbidities and neurocognitive disabilities in children. In France, the estimated excess medical costs attributed to FGR reach 235M€ for just the first year of care [9]. This underscores the need for the development of research programs to improve our knowledge of the developmental trajectories altered by FGR, a top priority that is currently under-recognized in global health. Strategies able to prevent FGR-related damage to the developing organs and system during the perinatal period would have immediate and significant clinical, educational and financial benefits for patients, their families and society.
Acknowledgements
Declared none.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
- GM-CSF
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
- IFN-γ
Interferon γ
- IGF-1
Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1
- IgG
Immunoglobulin G
- IL
Interleukin
- IQ
Intelligence Quotient
- PPAR-γ
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ
- VEGF
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jarvis S., Glinianaia S.V., Torrioli M-G., et al. Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: European collaborative study. Lancet. 2003;362(9390):1106–1111. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14466-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gordijn S.J., Beune I.M., Ganzevoort W. Building consensus and standards in fetal growth restriction studies. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018;49:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lausman A., Kingdom J., Gagnon R., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013;35(8):741–748. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30865-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Onis M., Blössner M., Villar J. Levels and patterns of intrauterine growth retardation in developing countries. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;52(Suppl. 1):S5–S15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frøen J.F., Gardosi J.O., Thurmann A., Francis A., Stray-Pedersen B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2004;83(9):801–807. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zeitlin J., Szamotulska K., Drewniak N., et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: A study of 19 countries. BJOG. 2013;120(11):1356–1365. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Katz J., Lee A.C., Kozuki N., et al. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: A pooled country analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):417–425. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60993-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ergaz Z., Avgil M., Ornoy A. Intrauterine growth restriction-etiology and consequences: What do we know about the human situation and experimental animal models? Reprod. Toxicol. 2005;20(3):301–322. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marzouk A., Filipovic-Pierucci A., Baud O., et al. Prenatal and post-natal cost of small for gestational age infants: A national study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017;17(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2155-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Burri P.H. Structural aspects of postnatal lung development - alveolar formation and growth. Biol. Neonate. 2006;89(4):313–322. doi: 10.1159/000092868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dezateux C., Lum S., Hoo A-F., Hawdon J., Costeloe K., Stocks J. Low birth weight for gestation and airway function in infancy: exploring the fetal origins hypothesis. Thorax. 2004;59(1):60–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bose C., Van Marter L.J., Laughon M., et al. Fetal growth restriction and chronic lung disease among infants born before the 28th week of gestation. Pediatrics. 2009;124(3):e450–e458. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eriksson L., Haglund B., Odlind V., Altman M., Ewald U., Kieler H. Perinatal conditions related to growth restriction and inflammation are associated with an increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(3):259–263. doi: 10.1111/apa.12888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zeitlin J., El Ayoubi M., Jarreau P-H., et al. Impact of fetal growth restriction on mortality and morbidity in a very preterm birth cohort. J. Pediatr. 2010;157(5):733–739. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Greenough A., Yuksel B., Cheeseman P. Effect of in utero growth retardation on lung function at follow-up of prematurely born infants. Eur. Respir. J. 2004;24(5):731–733. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00060304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pike K.C., Crozier S.R., Lucas J.S.A., et al. Patterns of fetal and infant growth are related to atopy and wheezing disorders at age 3 years. Thorax. 2010;65(12):1099–1106. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.134742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Morsing E., Gustafsson P., Brodszki J. Lung function in children born after foetal growth restriction and very preterm birth. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(1):48–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ronkainen E., Dunder T., Kaukola T., Marttila R., Hallman M. Intrauterine growth restriction predicts lower lung function at school age in children born very preterm. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(5):F412–F417. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kotecha S.J., Watkins W.J., Henderson A.J., Kotecha S. The effect of birth weight on lung spirometry in white, school-aged children and adolescents born at term: A longitudinal population based observational cohort study. J. Pediatr. 2015;166(5):1163–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gortner L. Intrauterine growth restriction and risk for arterial hypertension: A causal relationship? J. Perinat. Med. 2007;35(5):361–365. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen C-M., Wang L-F., Su B. Effects of maternal undernutrition during late gestation on the lung surfactant system and morphometry in rats. Pediatr. Res. 2004;56(3):329–335. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000134254.83113.8E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maritz G.S., Cock M.L., Louey S., Suzuki K., Harding R. Fetal growth restriction has long-term effects on postnatal lung structure in sheep. Pediatr. Res. 2004;55(2):287–295. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000106314.99930.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karadag A., Sakurai R., Wang Y., et al. Effect of maternal food restriction on fetal rat lung lipid differentiation program. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2009;44(7):635–644. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Maritz G.S., Cock M.L., Louey S., Joyce B.J., Albuquerque C.A., Harding R. Effects of fetal growth restriction on lung development before and after birth: A morphometric analysis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2001;32(3):201–210. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Joss-Moore L.A., Albertine K.H., Lane R.H. Epigenetics and the developmental origins of lung disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011;104(1-2):61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rehan V.K., Sakurai R., Li Y., et al. Effects of maternal food restriction on offspring lung extracellular matrix deposition and long term pulmonary function in an experimental rat model. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2012;47(2):162–171. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.O’Brien E.A., Barnes V., Zhao L., et al. Uteroplacental insufficiency decreases p53 serine-15 phosphorylation in term IUGR rat lungs. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2007;293(1):R314–R322. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00265.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rozance P.J., Seedorf G.J., Brown A., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction decreases pulmonary alveolar and vessel growth and causes pulmonary artery endothelial cell dysfunction in vitro in fetal sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2011;301(6):L860–L871. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00197.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Joyce B.J., Louey S., Davey M.G., Cock M.L., Hooper S.B., Harding R. Compromised respiratory function in postnatal lambs after placental insufficiency and intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr. Res. 2001;50(5):641–649. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200111000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Joss-Moore L.A., Wang Y., Baack M.L., et al. IUGR decreases PPARγ and SETD8 Expression in neonatal rat lung and these effects are ameliorated by maternal DHA supplementation. Early Hum. Dev. 2010;86(12):785–791. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cromi A., Ghezzi F., Raffaelli R., Bergamini V., Siesto G., Bolis P. Ultrasonographic measurement of thymus size in IUGR fetuses: A marker of the fetal immunoendocrine response to malnutrition. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;33(4):421–426. doi: 10.1002/uog.6320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Briana D.D., Baka S., Boutsikou M., et al. Soluble fas antigen and soluble fas ligand in intrauterine growth restriction. Neonatology. 2010;97(1):31–35. doi: 10.1159/000227290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pallotto E.K., Kilbride H.W. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;49(2):257–269. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200606000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tröger B., Göpel W., Faust K., et al. Risk for late-onset blood-culture proven sepsis in very-low-birth weight infants born small for gestational age: A large multicenter study from the German Neonatal Network. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014;33(3):238–243. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Longo S., Borghesi A., Tzialla C., Stronati M. IUGR and infections. Early Hum. Dev. 2014;90(Suppl. 1):S42–S44. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3782(14)70014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tröger B., Müller T., Faust K., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and the innate immune system in preterm infants of ≤32 weeks gestation. Neonatology. 2013;103(3):199–204. doi: 10.1159/000343260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Manerikar S.S., Malaviya A.N., Singh M.B., Rajgopalan P., Kumar R. Immune status and BCG vaccination in newborns with intra-uterine growth retardation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1976;26(1):173–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Contreras Y.M., Yu X., Hale M.A., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction alters T-lymphocyte cell number and dual specificity phosphatase 1 levels in the thymus of newborn and juvenile rats. Pediatr. Res. 2011;70(2):123–129. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31821f6e75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mukhopadhyay D., Weaver L., Tobin R., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and prematurity influence regulatory T cell development in newborns. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2014;49(5):727–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lang U., Baker R.S., Khoury J., Clark K.E. Effects of chronic reduction in uterine blood flow on fetal and placental growth in the sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2000;279(1):R53–R59. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.1.R53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.March M.I., Gupta M., Modest A.M., et al. Maternal risk factors for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1285–1290. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.951624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Amu S., Hahn-Zoric M., Malik A., et al. Cytokines in the placenta of Pakistani newborns with and without intrauterine growth retardation. Pediatr. Res. 2006;59(2):254–258. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000196332.37565.7d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hahn-Zoric M., Hagberg H., Kjellmer I., Ellis J., Wennergren M., Hanson L.Å. Aberrations in placental cytokine mRNA related to intrauterine growth retardation. Pediatr. Res. 2002;51(2):201–206. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200202000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lin Y., Wang J., Wang X., Wu W., Lai C. T cells development Is different between thymus from normal and intrauterine growth restricted pig fetus at different gestational stage. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;26(3):343–348. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhong X., Li W., Huang X., et al. Impairment of cellular immunity is associated with overexpression of heat shock protein 70 in neonatal pigs with intrauterine growth retardation. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2012;17(4):495–505. doi: 10.1007/s12192-012-0326-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tosun M., Celik H., Avci B., Yavuz E., Alper T., Malatyalioğlu E. Maternal and umbilical serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(8):880–886. doi: 10.3109/14767051003774942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Krajewski P., Sieroszewski P., Karowicz-Bilinska A., et al. Assessment of interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and interleukin-18 count in the serum of IUGR newborns. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(11):1142–1145. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.851186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McElrath T.F., Allred E.N., Van Marter L., Fichorova R.N., Leviton A. Perinatal systemic inflammatory responses of growth-restricted preterm newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(10):e439–e442. doi: 10.1111/apa.12339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Neta G.I., von Ehrenstein O.S., Goldman L.R., et al. Umbilical cord serum cytokine levels and risks of small-for-gestational-age and preterm birth. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010;171(8):859–867. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Marlow N., Morris T., Brocklehurst P., et al. A randomised trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neonatal sepsis: childhood outcomes at 5 years. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(4):F320–F326. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Barker D.J. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;49(2):270–283. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200606000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.McMillen I.C., Robinson J.S. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol. Rev. 2005;85(2):571–633. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00053.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bateson P., Barker D., Clutton-Brock T., et al. Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature. 2004;430(6998):419–421. doi: 10.1038/nature02725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pike K.C., Hanson M.A., Godfrey K.M. Developmental mismatch: Consequences for later cardiorespiratory health. BJOG. 2008;115(2):149–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Banister C.E., Koestler D.C., Maccani M.A., Padbury J.F., Houseman E.A., Marsit C.J. Infant growth restriction is associated with distinct patterns of DNA methylation in human placentas. Epigenetics. 2011;6(7):920–927. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.7.16079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sebert S., Sharkey D., Budge H., Symonds M.E. The early programming of metabolic health: Is epigenetic setting the missing link? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011;94(6) Suppl.:1953S–1958S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.001040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heindel J.J., Balbus J., Birnbaum L., et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: Integrating environmental influences. Endocrinology. 2015;156(10):3416–3421. doi: 10.1210/EN.2015-1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yuen R.K., Peñaherrera M.S., von Dadelszen P., McFadden D.E., Robinson W.P. DNA methylation profiling of human placentas reveals promoter hypomethylation of multiple genes in early-onset preeclampsia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;18(9):1006–1012. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Park J.H., Stoffers D.A., Nicholls R.D., Simmons R.A. Development of type 2 diabetes following intrauterine growth retardation in rats is associated with progressive epigenetic silencing of Pdx1. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;118(6):2316–2324. doi: 10.1172/JCI33655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xu Y.P., Liang L., Wang X-M. The levels of Pdx1/insulin, Cacna1c and Cacna1d, and β-cell mass in a rat model of intrauterine undernutrition. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):437–443. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.497571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lambertini L., Lee T-L., Chan W-Y., et al. Differential methylation of imprinted genes in growth-restricted placentas. Reprod. Sci. 2011;18(11):1111–1117. doi: 10.1177/1933719111404611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chelbi S.T., Doridot L., Mondon F., et al. Combination of promoter hypomethylation and PDX1 overexpression leads to TBX15 decrease in vascular IUGR placentas. Epigenetics. 2011;6(2):247–255. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.2.13791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Johansson S., Iliadou A., Bergvall N., Tuvemo T., Norman M., Cnattingius S. Risk of high blood pressure among young men increases with the degree of immaturity at birth. Circulation. 2005;112(22):3430–3436. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Brodszki J., Länne T., Marsál K., Ley D. Impaired vascular growth in late adolescence after intrauterine growth restriction. Circulation. 2005;111(20):2623–2628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.490326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Skilton M.R., Evans N., Griffiths K.A., Harmer J.A., Celermajer D.S. Aortic wall thickness in newborns with intrauterine growth restriction. Lancet. 2005;365(9469):1484–1486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66419-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Martyn C.N., Gale C.R., Jespersen S., Sherriff S.B. Impaired fetal growth and atherosclerosis of carotid and peripheral arteries. Lancet. 1998;352(9123):173–178. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10404-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zanardo V., Visentin S., Trevisanuto D., Bertin M., Cavallin F., Cosmi E. Fetal aortic wall thickness: a marker of hypertension in IUGR children? Hypertens. Res. 2013;36(5):440–443. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Crispi F., Bijnens B., Figueras F., et al. Fetal growth restriction results in remodeled and less efficient hearts in children. Circulation. 2010;121(22):2427–2436. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Menendez-Castro C., Fahlbusch F., Cordasic N., et al. Early and late postnatal myocardial and vascular changes in a protein restriction rat model of intrauterine growth restriction. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Oliveira V., de Souza L.V., Fernandes T., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction-induced deleterious adaptations in endothelial progenitor cells: Possible mechanism to impair endothelial function. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2017;8(6):665–673. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wlodek M.E., Westcott K., Siebel A.L., Owens J.A., Moritz K.M. Growth restriction before or after birth reduces nephron number and increases blood pressure in male rats. Kidney Int. 2008;74(2):187–195. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rakow A., Johansson S., Legnevall L., et al. Renal volume and function in school-age children born preterm or small for gestational age. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2008;23(8):1309–1315. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0824-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bacchetta J., Harambat J., Dubourg L., et al. Both extrauterine and intrauterine growth restriction impair renal function in children born very preterm. Kidney Int. 2009;76(4):445–452. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rees S., Harding R., Walker D. An adverse intrauterine environment: implications for injury and altered development of the brain. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2008;26(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2007.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Miller S.L., Huppi P.S., Mallard C. The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome. J. Physiol. 2016;594(4):807–823. doi: 10.1113/JP271402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Korzeniewski S.J., Allred E.N., Joseph R.M., et al. Neurodevelopment at Age 10 Years of Children Born <28 Weeks With Fetal Growth Restriction. Pediatrics. 2017;140(5):140. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Freire G., Shevell M., Oskoui M. Cerebral palsy: Phenotypes and risk factors in term singletons born small for gestational age. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2015;19(2):218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Murray E., Fernandes M., Fazel M., Kennedy S.H., Villar J., Stein A. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: A systematic review. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1062–1072. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Blair E.M., Nelson K.B. Fetal growth restriction and risk of cerebral palsy in singletons born after at least 35 weeks’ gestation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;212(4):520.e1–520.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Guellec I., Lapillonne A., Marret S., et al. Effect of Intra- and Extrauterine Growth on Long-Term Neurologic Outcomes of Very Preterm Infants. J. Pediatr. 2016;175:93–99.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jacobsson B., Ahlin K., Francis A., Hagberg G., Hagberg H., Gardosi J. Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: Population-based case-control study. BJOG. 2008;115(10):1250–1255. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01827.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bickle Graz M., Tolsa J-F., Fischer Fumeaux C.J. Being small for gestational age: Does it matter for the neurodevelopment of premature infants? A cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Edmonds C.J., Isaacs E.B., Cole T.J., et al. The effect of intrauterine growth on verbal IQ scores in childhood: A study of monozygotic twins. Pediatrics. 2010;126(5):e1095–e1101. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Baschat A.A. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2014;36(2):136–142. doi: 10.1159/000353631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Olivier P., Baud O., Evrard P., Gressens P., Verney C. Prenatal ischemia and white matter damage in rats. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2005;64(11):998–1006. doi: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000187052.81889.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Olivier P., Baud O., Bouslama M., Evrard P., Gressens P., Verney C. Moderate growth restriction: Deleterious and protective effects on white matter damage. Neurobiol. Dis. 2007;26(1):253–263. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Reid M.V., Murray K.A., Marsh E.D., Golden J.A., Simmons R.A., Grinspan J.B. Delayed myelination in an intrauterine growth retardation model is mediated by oxidative stress upregulating bone morphogenetic protein 4. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2012;71(7):640–653. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31825cfa81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tolsa C.B., Zimine S., Warfield S.K., et al. Early alteration of structural and functional brain development in premature infants born with intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr. Res. 2004;56(1):132–138. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000128983.54614.7E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhao M., Dai H., Deng Y., Zhao L. SGA as a risk factor for cerebral palsy in moderate to late preterm infants: A system review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38853. doi: 10.1038/srep38853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Rees S., Harding R., Walker D. The biological basis of injury and neuroprotection in the fetal and neonatal brain. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2011;29(6):551–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Poudel R., McMillen I.C., Dunn S.L., Zhang S., Morrison J.L. Impact of chronic hypoxemia on blood flow to the brain, heart, and adrenal gland in the late-gestation IUGR sheep fetus. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015;308(3):R151–R162. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00036.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Figueras F., Cruz-Martinez R., Sanz-Cortes M., et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth-restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain-sparing. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;38(3):288–294. doi: 10.1002/uog.9041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Flood K., Unterscheider J., Daly S., et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014;211(3):288.e1–288.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Mone F., McConnell B., Thompson A., et al. Fetal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index and childhood neurocognitive outcome at 12 years. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e008916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hernandez-Andrade E., Figueroa-Diesel H., Jansson T., Rangel-Nava H., Gratacos E. Changes in regional fetal cerebral blood flow perfusion in relation to hemodynamic deterioration in severely growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;32(1):71–76. doi: 10.1002/uog.5377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Esteban F.J., Padilla N., Sanz-Cortés M., et al. Fractal-dimension analysis detects cerebral changes in preterm infants with and without intrauterine growth restriction. Neuroimage. 2010;53(4):1225–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Padilla N., Falcón C., Sanz-Cortés M., et al. Differential effects of intrauterine growth restriction on brain structure and development in preterm infants: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Res. 2011;1382:98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dubois J., Benders M., Borradori-Tolsa C., et al. Primary cortical folding in the human newborn: An early marker of later functional development. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 8):2028–2041. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Samuelsen G.B., Pakkenberg B., Bogdanović N., et al. Severe cell reduction in the future brain cortex in human growth-restricted fetuses and infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;197(1):56.e1–56.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mazur M., Miller R.H., Robinson S. Postnatal erythropoietin treatment mitigates neural cell loss after systemic prenatal hypoxic-ischemic injury. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 2010;6(3):206–221. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.PEDS1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Guo R., Hou W., Dong Y., Yu Z., Stites J., Weiner C.P. Brain injury caused by chronic fetal hypoxemia is mediated by inflammatory cascade activation. Reprod. Sci. 2010;17(6):540–548. doi: 10.1177/1933719110364061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tolcos M., Bateman E., O’Dowd R., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction affects the maturation of myelin. Exp. Neurol. 2011;232(1):53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pham H., Duy A.P., Pansiot J., et al. Impact of inhaled nitric oxide on white matter damage in growth-restricted neonatal rats. Pediatr. Res. 2015;77(4):563–569. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Mallard C., Loeliger M., Copolov D., Rees S. Reduced number of neurons in the hippocampus and the cerebellum in the postnatal guinea-pig following intrauterine growth-restriction. Neuroscience. 2000;100(2):327–333. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Miller S.L., Yawno T., Alers N.O., et al. Antenatal antioxidant treatment with melatonin to decrease newborn neurodevelopmental deficits and brain injury caused by fetal growth restriction. J. Pineal Res. 2014;56(3):283–294. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Fung C., Ke X., Brown A.S., Yu X., McKnight R.A., Lane R.H. Uteroplacental insufficiency alters rat hippocampal cellular phenotype in conjunction with ErbB receptor expression. Pediatr. Res. 2012;72(1):2–9. doi: 10.1038/pr.2012.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Isaacs E.B., Lucas A., Chong W.K., et al. Hippocampal volume and everyday memory in children of very low birth weight. Pediatr. Res. 2000;47(6):713–720. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200006000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Illa M., Eixarch E., Batalle D., et al. Long-term functional outcomes and correlation with regional brain connectivity by MRI diffusion tractography metrics in a near-term rabbit model of intrauterine growth restriction. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Rideau BNA, Pham H. Transcriptomic regulations in oligodendroglial and microglial cells related to brain damage following fetal growth restriction. Glia. 2016;64(12):2306–2320. doi: 10.1002/glia.23079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Batalle D., Eixarch E., Figueras F., et al. Altered small-world topology of structural brain networks in infants with intrauterine growth restriction and its association with later neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuroimage. 2012;60(2):1352–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Padilla N., Fransson P., Donaire A., et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity in preterm infants with fetal growth restriction evaluated at 12 months Corrected Age. Cereb. Cortex. 2017;27(10):4750–4758. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Baud O., Daire J-L., Dalmaz Y., et al. Gestational hypoxia induces white matter damage in neonatal rats: A new model of periventricular leukomalacia. Brain Pathol. 2004;14(1):1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00492.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Favrais G., van de Looij Y., Fleiss B., et al. Systemic inflammation disrupts the developmental program of white matter. Ann. Neurol. 2011;70(4):550–565. doi: 10.1002/ana.22489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Leviton A., Fichorova R.N., O’Shea T.M., et al. Two-hit model of brain damage in the very preterm newborn: Small for gestational age and postnatal systemic inflammation. Pediatr. Res. 2013;73(3):362–370. doi: 10.1038/pr.2012.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Campbell L.R., Pang Y., Ojeda N.B., Zheng B., Rhodes P.G., Alexander B.T. Intracerebral lipopolysaccharide induces neuroinflammatory change and augmented brain injury in growth-restricted neonatal rats. Pediatr. Res. 2012;71(6):645–652. doi: 10.1038/pr.2012.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Fleiss B., Gressens P. Tertiary mechanisms of brain damage: A new hope for treatment of cerebral palsy? Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(6):556–566. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Leviton A., Dammann O. Brain damage markers in children. Neurobiological and clinical aspects. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(1):9–13. doi: 10.1080/080352502753457851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Gazzolo D., Visser G.H., Lituania M., et al. S100B protein cord blood levels and development of fetal behavioral states: A study in normal and small-for-dates fetuses. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;11(6):378–384. doi: 10.1080/jmf.11.6.378.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]