Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncogenesis logoLink to Oncogenesis
. 2019 Mar 14;8(3):22. doi: 10.1038/s41389-019-0132-4

PEST-containing nuclear protein regulates cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in lung adenocarcinoma

Da-Yong Wang 1,2,#, Ya Hong 2,3,#, Ya-Ge Chen 2,3, Peng-Zhen Dong 2,3, Shi-Yu Liu 2,3, Ying-Ran Gao 2,3, Dan Lu 2,3, Hui-Min Li 2,3, Tao Li 2,3, Jian-Cheng Guo 4, Fei He 5, Xue-Qun Ren 5, Shi-Yong Sun 6, Dong-Dong Wu 2,3,✉, Shao-Feng Duan 3,7,✉, Xin-Ying Ji 2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC6418141  PMID: 30872582

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. PEST-containing nuclear protein (PCNP) has been found in the nucleus of cancer cells. Whether PCNP plays a role in the growth of lung adenocarcinoma is still unknown. In the present study, the results indicated that the level of PCNP in lung adenocarcinoma tissue was significantly higher than that in corresponding adjacent non-tumor tissue. Over-expression of PCNP promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells, while down-regulation of PCNP exhibited opposite effects. PCNP over-expression decreased apoptosis through up-regulating the expression levels of phospho (p)-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3 and p-STAT5 in lung adenocarcinoma cells, whereas PCNP knockdown showed opposite trends. PCNP overexpression enhanced autophagy by increasing the expression levels of p-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), p-Akt, and p-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in lung adenocarcinoma cells, however an opposite trend was observed in the sh-PCNP group. In addition, overexpression of PCNP showed the tumor-promoting effect on xenografted lung adenocarcinoma, while PCNP knockdown reduced the growth of lung adenocarcinoma via regulating angiogenesis. Our study elucidates that PCNP can regulate the procession of human lung adenocarcinoma cells via STAT3/5 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways. PCNP may be considered as a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, PCNP can be a novel therapeutic target and potent PCNP inhibitors can be designed and developed in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world1,2. Lung cancer can be divided into many histological categories, including lung adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, squamous cell lung carcinoma, and small cell lung carcinoma3. The majority of patients with lung cancer present with locally advanced/metastatic disease, which will lead to a poor prognosis4. The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with advanced lung cancer or metastatic lung cancer remains less than 20%5. Immune checkpoint therapy, particularly anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, is a novel cancer therapy and has become the standard therapy for a variety of tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)6–8. Nevertheless, the clinical benefit is limited to a subset of patients, which can be attributed to immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments and individual differences in tumor immunogenicity6,9. Oncogenic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase domain have been found in NSCLC10,11. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are regarded as the standard first-line treatment of patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations10,12,13. However, patients treated with EGFR-TKIs can develop resistance against these drugs10,12. Therefore, identification of specific molecular targets and development of effective therapeutic strategies are still urgently needed for the treatment of lung cancer2,4,14.

PEST is a peptide sequence which is rich in proline (P), glutamic acid (E), serine (S), and threonine (T)15–17. PEST-containing nuclear protein (PCNP) is firstly identified in the nucleus by database mining18. Recent studies indicate that PCNP mRNA has been detected in several cancer cells, including HepG2 hepatoma cells, U-937 myeloid leukemia cells, and HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells, suggesting that PCNP may be involved in some aspects of tumorigenesis18,19. Our previous study has shown that PCNP could mediate the growth of human neuroblastoma cells via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways20. However, the expression level of PCNP in lung adenocarcinoma remains unknown, as well as the mechanism of action of PCNP on the procession of lung adenocarcinoma has not yet been elucidated.

In the current study, the expression level of PCNP in human lung adenocarcinoma was examined. The mechanism of action of PCNP in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma cells was investigated. The effects of PCNP on tumor growth and angiogenesis in nude mice bearing with human lung adenocarcinoma were further determined.

Results

PCNP protein level is higher in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue than that in adjacent normal tissue

In light of the fact that lung adenocarcinoma is the major form of lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma was investigated in the present study. In order to determine the level of PCNP in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue, we examined PCNP level in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue chip that includes 63 lung adenocarcinoma specimens and adjacent non-tumor tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Our results indicated that the level of PCNP was higher in all clinical stages of human lung adenocarcinoma than that in adjacent tissues (Fig. 1a, b). We further determined the level of PCNP in fresh surgical specimens of lung adenocarcinoma and corresponding adjacent normal tissues. The results were in line with the conclusions mentioned above that PCNP level was high in lung adenocarcinoma tissues but low in adjacent non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1c, d). To determine the clinical significance of PCNP in lung adenocarcinoma, we further analyzed the association of PCNP level with clinicopathological parameters in lung adenocarcinoma tissue chip (Table 1). The results showed that PCNP level was associated with T classification of lung adenocarcinoma. Overall, the results indicate that PCNP may be a promising biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma and can serve as a growth regulator in lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 1. The expression of PCNP in human lung adenocarcinoma tissues.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a IHC results of PCNP expression in different clinical stages of human lung adenocarcinoma tissues and adjacent tissues (left: ×400; right: enlarged). b IHC sum scores were adopted to compare PCNP expression in different clinical stages of human lung adenocarcinoma tissues and adjacent tissues. c Representative results of PCNP protein expression in fresh human lung adenocarcinoma tissues (T) and adjacent normal tissues (N) detected by Western blotting. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the loading control. d Statistical results showed that the protein levels of PCNP were significantly elevated in fresh human lung adenocarcinoma tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). **P < 0.01 compared with adjacent normal tissues

Table 1.

Association between PCNP expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (n = 63)

Characteristics Cases PCNP expression P value
Low High
Age (years) 0.195
 ≤65 47 20 27
 >65 16 4 12
Gender 0.667
 Male 33 15 18
 Female 30 9 21
Tumor size (cm) 0.147
 ≤5 50 18 32
 >5 13 6 7
Disease grade 0.12
 I 7 4 3
 II 42 17 25
 III 14 3 11
T classification 0.035
 T1 19 6 13
 T2 32 15 17
 T3 10 2 8
 T4 2 1 1
Lymph node status 0.969
 NX、N0 45 16 29
 N1、N2、N3 18 8 10
Open in a new tab

PCNP mediates the proliferation and viability of human lung adenocarcinoma cells

To detect the role of PCNP in the growth of human lung adenocarcinoma cells, overexpression and knockdown experiments were performed. Transfection of PCNP into A549 and H1299 cells enhanced the PCNP level and transfection of PCNP short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) (sh-PCNP) reduced the expression of PCNP in A549 and H1299 cells (Fig. 2a). In addition, similar trends were observed in the levels of PCNP mRNA and protein (Fig. 2b–d). These results indicate that the models for PCNP overexpression and knockdown have been established successfully. PCNP overexpression promoted the proliferation and viability of A549 and H1299 cells, while PCNP knockdown showed reverse trends (Fig. 2e–g). Furthermore, PCNP overexpression increased the colony number and PCNP knockdown exhibited an opposite effect (Fig. 2h, i). In aggregate, the results suggest that PCNP can mediate the proliferation and viability of human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 2. Effects of PCNP on the proliferation and viability of human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a Fluorescence microscopy of PCNP in A549 and H1299 cells; original magnification ×100. b The expression level of PCNP mRNA was examined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The results were normalized to the level of GAPDH. c The protein expression of PCNP was examined by Western blotting. GAPDH was used as the loading control. d The densitometry analysis of PCNP was performed, normalized to the corresponding GAPDH level. e DNA replication activities of A549 and H1299 cells in each group were examined by 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay; original magnification ×100. f The proliferation rate of each group was analyzed. g The percentages of viable cells were determined using CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS) and the cell viability of the control group was taken as 100%. h The clonogenic capacity was determined in A549 and H1299 cells. i The numbers of colonies larger than 0.1 mm in diameter were counted. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments; **P < 0.01 compared with the Mock group; ##P < 0.01 compared with the sh-Scb group

PCNP mediates the migration and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma cells

As shown in Fig. 3a, b, PCNP overexpression promoted the migration of A549 and H1299 cells and PCNP knockdown exhibited the opposite effect. Furthermore, PCNP overexpression increased the anchorage-independent growth of A549 and H1299 cells, while a reverse trend was observed in the sh-PCNP group (Fig. 3c, d). The migration and invasion capacities of A549 and H1299 cells were improved in the PCNP group, whereas the sh-PCNP group showed opposite effects (Fig. 3e–h). Collectively, the results demonstrate that PCNP is involved in the regulation of the migration and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 3. Effects of PCNP on the migration and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a The effect of PCNP on cell migration was measured by wound healing assay; original magnification ×100. b The migration rates of A549 and H1299 cells were calculated. c Soft agar assay was performed to examine the anchorage-independent survival of cells; original magnification ×100. d The number of colonies was calculated. e Transwell assay was performed to assess the migration of A549 and H1299 cells; original magnification ×200. f Transwell assay was performed to assess the invasion of A549 and H1299 cells; original magnification ×200. g The numbers of the migrated cells were calculated. h The numbers of the invasive cells were calculated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments; **P < 0.01 compared with the Mock group; ##P < 0.01 compared with the sh-Scb group

PCNP modulates apoptosis through the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3/5 pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells

The apoptotic index decreased in the PCNP group compared with the Mock group and increased in the sh-PCNP group compared with the sh-Scb group (Fig. 4a, b). Furthermore, similar trends were observed in the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) in human lung adenocarcinoma cells (Fig. 4c–e). Recent studies have demonstrated that STAT3 and STAT5 are persistently hyperactivated (phosphorylated) in different types of cancer21–23. The constitutive activation of STAT3 and STAT5 play vital roles in the proliferation, survival, apoptosis, and angiogenesis of cancer cells21,24,25. The protein levels of phospho (p)-STAT3 and p-STAT5 in the PCNP group were higher than those in the Mock group, whereas the two protein levels in the sh-PCNP group were lower than those in the sh-Scb group (Fig. 4f–h). Taken together, the results indicate that PCNP modulates apoptosis via STAT3/5 pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 4. Effects of PCNP on the apoptosis and STAT3/5 signaling pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

a The apoptotic levels of A549 and H1299 cells were measured by TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining; original magnification ×100. b The percentages of TUNEL-positive cells were calculated. c Western blotting analysis for the expression of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP in A549 and H1299 cells. GAPDH was used as the loading control. d, e The densitometry analyses of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP were performed in A549 and H1299 cells, normalized to the corresponding GAPDH level. f Western blotting analysis for the expression of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-STAT5, and STAT5 in A549 and H1299 cells. GAPDH was used as the loading control. g, h The densitometry analyses of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-STAT5, and STAT5 were performed in A549 and H1299 cells, normalized to the corresponding GAPDH level. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 compared with the Mock group; ##P < 0.01 compared with the sh-Scb group

PCNP modulates autophagy via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells

Autophagy is a highly regulated process in which the constituents are delivered to lysosomes for degradation in cells26. Autophagy plays key roles in the development, physiology, and homeostasis. Dysregulated autophagy can lead to a number of pathophysiological conditions27. Autophagy is involved in the aetiology of cancer, playing the pro-survival or pro-death role depending on the types and stages of cancer28. An inefficient autophagy contributes to tumorigenesis and has been found in the early stage of cancer. However, increased autophagy plays an important role in advanced malignancies correlating with an metastatic/invasive phenotype29,30. Beclin 1, LC3, and p62 are involved in autophagy and have been widely regarded as autophagic markers31,32. Our results showed that PCNP overexpression increased the protein levels of Beclin 1 and P62, while PCNP knockdown decreased the expression levels of these proteins (Fig. 5a–c). In addition, the protein level of LC3A/B exhibited a reverse trend. An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway plays a key role in regulating cell autophagy33–35. The results indicated that PCNP overexpression enhanced the protein levels of p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR, whereas PCNP knockdown exerted opposite effects (Fig. 5d–f). These results together suggest that PCNP modulates autophagy via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 5. Effects of PCNP on the autophagy and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

a Western blotting analysis for the expression of Beclin-1, LC3A/B, and P62 in A549 and H1299 cells. GAPDH was used as the loading control. b, c The densitometry analyses of Beclin-1, LC3A/B, and P62 were performed in A549 and H1299 cells, normalized to the corresponding GAPDH level. d Western blotting analysis for the expression of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, Akt, p-mTOR, and mTOR in A549 and H1299 cells. GAPDH was used as the loading control. e, f The densitometry analyses of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, Akt, p-mTOR, and mTOR were performed in A549 and H1299 cells, normalized to the corresponding GAPDH level. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 compared with the Mock group; #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01 compared with the sh-Scb group

PCNP regulates the growth and angiogenesis of human lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors in nude mice

A549 and H1299 cells have been adopted to establish subcutaneous xenograft tumor models36–38. We further investigated the effects of PCNP on the growth of lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors. The results indicated that PCNP overexpression significantly promoted the growth of xenograft tumors when compared with the Mock group. Nevertheless, PCNP knockdown notably reduced the growth of xenograft tumors compared to the sh-Scb group (Fig. 6a–e). Furthermore, no significant difference was detected in body weight among groups (Fig. 6f, g). The results of Ki67 staining indicated that PCNP overexpression increased the in vivo proliferation of lung adenocarcinoma cells and a reverse effect was observed in the sh-PCNP group. Moreover, the microvessel density (MVD) of lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors exhibited a similar trend (Fig. 6h–l). In sum, these results reveal that PCNP mediates the growth and angiogenesis of human lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors.

Fig. 6. Effects of PCNP on the growth, proliferation index (PI), and MVD of A549 and H1299 xenograft tumors in nude mice.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

a Representative xenografts dissected from different groups of nude mice were shown. b, c The tumor volume of each group was measured every day and the tumor volume doubling time (TVDT) was calculated. d, e The tumors were weighed and the inhibition rates of tumor growth were calculated. f, g The body weight change curve of each group during the experiment and the body weight of each group on the first day (day 0) and the last day (day 28). h, i, j Representive photographs of hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Ki67, and cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) staining in A549 and H1299 xenograft tumors; original magnification ×400. k, l The PI and MVD were calculated. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6); **P < 0.01 compared with the Mock group; ##P < 0.01 compared with the sh-Scb group

Discussion

Recent studies suggest that the mRNA expression of PCNP could be detected in several types of cancer, such as HepG2 hepatoma cells, HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells, and U-937 myeloid leukemia cells, suggesting that PCNP may be involved in tumorigenesis18,19. In addition, our previous study has demonstrated that PCNP could be detected in human neuroblastoma cells both at mRNA and protein levels20. However, the expression level of PCNP in lung adenocarcinoma is still unknown. In this study, our results suggested that PCNP level was higher in lung adenocarcinoma tissue compared with adjacent non-tumor tissue. Furthermore, PCNP expression was associated with T classification of lung adenocarcinoma. In light of the results, we can conclude that PCNP level is high in lung cancer tissue but low in adjacent non-tumor tissue, indicating that PCNP is a novel promising biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer and may be involved in the procession of lung cancer.

Our previous study has demonstrated that PCNP can mediate the growth of human neuroblastoma cells via MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways20. Nevertheless, the mechanism of action of PCNP on the growth of lung adenocarcinoma has not been clarified. The human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines A549 and H1299 have been adopted to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different agents/drugs36–38. In this study, A549 and H1299 cells were used to detect the mechanism of action of PCNP on the growth of lung adenocarcinoma. It has been shown that PCNP overexpression could decrease the proliferation, viability, migration, and invasion of SH-SY5Y and SK-N-SH cells, while PCNP knockdown exhibits opposite effects20. In the present study, our data indicated that PCNP overexpression increased the proliferation and viability and promoted the migration and invasion of A549 and H1299 cells, while PCNP knockdown played opposite roles, suggesting that PCNP is involved in the procession of human lung adenocarcinoma cells. However, it should be noted that PCNP could exhibit different effects on human neuroblastoma cells and lung adenocarcinoma cells, which can be attributed to the heterogeneity of tumor types.

Apoptosis is a key regulatory process for the maintenance and development of homeostasis in multicellular organisms39. Two apoptotic pathways have been elucidated in mammals: mitochondria-mediated and death receptor-dependent pathways40. A variety of stimuli activate caspases and activated caspase-3 can further cleave PARP, resulting in the occurrence of apoptosis41. The results indicated that PCNP overexpression notably decreased the apoptotic index and expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and PARP, while PCNP knockdown significantly increased apoptosis, indicating that PCNP mediates mitochondria-dependent apoptotic pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. STAT proteins are transcription factors that regulate various biological processes42. STAT3 activation could promote the expression of gene products required for cell-cycle regulators, inhibitors of apoptosis, and inducers of angiogenesis, resulting in increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis in various cancer cells43,44. Furthermore, STAT5 also mediates proliferation and apoptosis in many cancer cells43,45. Recent studies have found that both STAT3 and STAT5 are activated in lung cancer cells and tissues, indicating functional roles for these proteins in lung cancer21,46. In line with these studies, our results suggested that the protein levels of p-STAT3 and p-STAT5 in the PCNP group were higher than those in the Mock group. However, the levels of these proteins were lower in the sh-PCNP group when compared with the sh-Scb group. Therefore, it can be concluded that PCNP can modulate apoptosis via STAT3/5 pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Autophagy is an evolutionarily ancient and conserved catabolic process, in which cytoplasmic materials are sequestered in vesicles and delivered to lysosomes for degradation, resulting in the turnover of cell constituents and the generation of energy and macromolecular precursors26,47. Autophagy plays a multifactorial role in the initiation and procession of cancer, as well as in the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions against cancer48. It has been revealed that normal tissues are less autophagy-dependent than tumors. Thus, inhibition of autophagy can be a useful strategy in the treatment of cancer49. Our results showed that PCNP overexpression increased the autophagy level and PCNP knockdown exhibited opposite effects. Signals that activate the autophagic process typically originate from many conditions of stress, such as oxidative stress, hypoxia, starvation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, protein aggregation, and others50,51. Recent studies have shown that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is involved in the promotion of cell autophagy34,52. The results indicated that PCNP overexpression promoted the expression levels of p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR, while PCNP knockdown reduced the levels of these proteins. The results suggest that PCNP modulates autophagy via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma cells.

A549 and H1299 cells have been adopted to establish xenograft tumor models36–38. Then we detected the role of PCNP in the growth of lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors in nude mice. PCNP overexpression markedly promoted the growth of lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors, while PCNP knockdown notably reduced tumor growth. Ki67 is a nuclear non-histone protein expressed in proliferating cells53. Ki67 is considered a marker for cell proliferation and is widely used in detecting the proliferative level of cancer cells20,53. Similar to our findings in vitro, our results indicated that the Ki67 level was increased in the PCNP group but decreased in the sh-PCNP group. CD31, a specific biomarker for vascular endothelial cells (VEC), has been represented by the tumor MVD20. Our results suggested that PCNP overexpression promoted the level of CD31, whereas PCNP knockdown reduced the MVD in lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors, indicating that PCNP regulates the growth of human lung adenocarcinoma xenograft tumors through the mediation of angiogenesis.

In summary, our study indicates that PCNP could be detected in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Importantly, the protein level of PCNP in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue is higher than that in adjacent non-tumor tissue. In addition, our findings reveal that PCNP mediates the proliferation, migration, and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma cells via STAT3/5 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways. In light of its role in the development of human lung adenocarcinoma cells, PCNP may be considered as a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, PCNP can be a potential therapeutic target and potent PCNP inhibitors can be designed and developed in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

Tissue samples

The expression levels of PCNP were detected in 63 human lung adenocarcinoma specimens and corresponding non-tumor lung tissues (National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform, Shanghai, China) by IHC. The informed consent was obtained from each subject after approval of the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University (20180517). Then four fresh specimens of patients who underwent surgery were collected to detect the protein levels of PCNP. Pathological classification and clinical staging were evaluated according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria54.

Immunohistochemical staining

Tissue sections were evaluated by two experienced pathologists independently. The results were semi-quantitatively scored according to the percentage of positively stained cells (0, 0%; 1, 1–25%; 2, 26–50%; 3, 51–75%; 4, 76%–100%) and the staining intensity (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong). The two scores were combined to come up with a final PCNP expression score for each specimen. The score can be defined as follows: 0–3, low expression; 4–7, high expression55.

Cell culture

Human lung adenocarcinoma A549 and H1299 cell lines were obtained from Nanjing Kebai Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). A549 cells were incubated with DMEM medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin. H1299 cells were incubated with RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin. Cells were cultured at 37 ˚C in a humidified atmosphere composed of 5% CO2 and 95% air.

Overexpression and knockdown of PCNP

Overexpression and knockdown of PCNP were performed in A549 and H1299 cells as previously described20. The localization of PCNP in cancer cells was observed with a fluorescent microscope (Eclipse Ti, Nikon, Melville, NY, USA).

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and then treated with DNase I (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The RT-PCR reaction was performed as previously described20.

Cell viability and proliferation assays

Cell viability and proliferation assays were separately performed using a MTS kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and a Cell-Light EdU Apollo 567 In vitro Imaging Kit (RiboBio, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell proliferation rate (%) = (EdU-positive cells)/(total number of cells) × 10056.

Colony formation assay

Cells were cultured at a density of 6 × 102 cells/well in 6-well plates. After cultivation for two weeks, the colonies were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer and fixed using 1 ml methanol for 15 min at room temperature. 1 ml crystal violet was then added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The plates were washed thoroughly with deionized water and dried in air at room temperature. Then the plates were scanned and the number of colonies was counted.

Wound healing assay

Confluent cells were scratched using a sterile 200 μl pipette tip. The detached cells and debris were removed by washing with PBS. The migration distance was observed with an Olympus CKX41 microscope and determined using Image J software (National Institute for Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The migration rate (MR) was calculated as previously described57.

Soft agar assay

Soft agar assay was performed as previously described20. Colonies were observed and counted using an Olympus CKX41 microscope.

Migration and invasion assays

Migration and invasion assays were performed as previously described20. The numbers of stained cells were counted under a Zeiss Axioskop 2 plus microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA).

TUNEL assay

TUNEL staining was assessed by an In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The apoptotic cells were observed using a fluorescent microscope. The percentage of cells positive for TUNEL was calculated using Image J software.

Western blotting

Total protein was extracted from A549 and H1299 cells. Western blotting was carried out to determine the protein levels. The primary antibodies including anti-STAT3, anti-STAT5, anti-p-STAT3 (Tyr705), anti-p-STAT5 (Try694), anti-PI3K, anti-p-PI3K (Tyr458/Tyr199), anti-Akt, anti-p-Akt (Ser473), anti-mTOR, anti-p-mTOR (Ser2448), anti-P62, anti-LC3A/B, and anti-Beclin-1 antibodies were obtained from CST (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-PCNP antibody was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-cleaved PARP, anti-cleaved caspase-3, and anti-GAPDH antibodies were provided by ProteinTech (Chicago, IL, USA). Secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was obtained from CST. The immunodetection was then visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The band intensities were semi-quantified by Image J software. The expression of each protein was normalized to the expression level of GAPDH.

Animal study

Animal studies were approved by the Committee of Medical Ethics and Welfare for Experimental Animals of Henan University School of Medicine (HUSOM-2017-190). Animal experiments were performed as previously described20. Thirty (n = 6 per group) BALB/C nude mice (4-week-old, male) were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Certificate No. SCXK (Jing) 2011–0011, Beijing, China). A549 and H1299 cells (2 × 106 cells in 200 μl PBS) with overexpression or knockdown of PCNP were inoculated subcutaneously into the right flanks of nude mice. The body weighs and tumor volumes were daily measured. The tumor volume was calculated according to the formula: volume = L × W2/2, where L is the longest dimension and W is the dimension perpendicular to L58. The TVDT was calculated as TVDT = log2/log(V2/V1) × (T − T0), where V1 and V2 indicate tumor volumes at two time points and (T − T0) represents the time interval59. Then mice were sacrificed and tumor masses were removed and weighted. The inhibition rate (IR) of tumor growth was calculated as IR = [(A – B)/A] × 100%, where A and B represent the average tumor weights of the control group and the treatment group respectively20.

HE staining

Tumor sections were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, cut at 5 μm thickness and stained with HE. Then tumor tissues were photographed.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Tumor samples were stained with the anti-Ki67 monoclonal antibody (CST, Danvers, MA, USA). The PI was defined as the percentage of positively stained cells among the total number of cells60. CD31 is a biomarker for VEC, and the immunostaining density of CD31 is regarded as tumor MVD61. Tumor sections were stained with CD31 antibody (CST, Danvers, MA, USA) to detect tumor MVD. Stained vessels with a clearly defined lumen or well-defined linear vessel shape were counted.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. The differences between multiple groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 17.0 software, followed by Tukey’s test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81802718, U1504817, 81670088), the Foundation of Science & Technology Department of Henan Province, China (Nos. 182102310335, 172102410019, 162102410009), the Science Foundation of Kaifeng City, China (Nos. 1703016, 1608004), and the Science Foundation of Henan University, China (No. yqpy20170044).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Da-Yong Wang, Ya Hong

Contributor Information

Dong-Dong Wu, Phone: +86 371 23880525, Email: ddwubiomed2010@163.com.

Shao-Feng Duan, Phone: +86 371 23880680, Email: dsf_2007@163.com.

Xin-Ying Ji, Phone: +86 371 23880585, Email: 10190096@vip.henu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Keith RL, Miller YE. Lung cancer chemoprevention: current status and future prospects. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013;10:334–343. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen Z, Fillmore CM, Hammerman PS, Kim CF, Wong KK. Non-small-cell lung cancers: a heterogeneous set of diseases. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:535–546. doi: 10.1038/nrc3775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Politi K, Herbst RS. Lung cancer in the era of precision medicine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:2213–2220. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lennon FE, et al. Lung cancer-a fractal viewpoint. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2015;12:664–675. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kanodra NM, Silvestri GA, Tanner NT. Screening and early detection efforts in lung cancer. Cancer. 2015;121:1347–1356. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marin-Acevedo JA, et al. Next generation of immune checkpoint therapy in cancer: new developments and challenges. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018;11:39. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0582-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu SY, Wu YL. Ongoing clinical trials of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors for lung cancer in China. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017;10:136. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0506-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li Z, Song W, Rubinstein M, Liu D. Recent updates in cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review and perspective of the 2018 China Cancer Immunotherapy Workshop in Beijing. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018;11:142. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0684-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marin-Acevedo JA, Soyano AE, Dholaria B, Knutson KL, Lou Y. Cancer immunotherapy beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018;11:8. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0552-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haratani K, et al. Tumor immune microenvironment and nivolumab efficacy in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer based on T790M status after disease progression during EGFR-TKI treatment. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:1532–1539. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gallant JN, et al. EGFR kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is a novel oncogenic driver in lung cancer that is clinically responsive to afatinib. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:1155–1163. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tan CS, Gilligan D, Pacey S. Treatment approaches for EGFR-inhibitor-resistant patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e447–e459. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopez-Chavez A, Giaccone G. Targeted therapies: Importance of patient selection for EGFR TKIs in lung cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2010;7:360–362. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rudin CM, et al. Rovalpituzumab tesirine, a DLL3-targeted antibody-drug conjugate, in recurrent small-cell lung cancer: a first-in-human, first-in-class, open-label, phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:42–51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30565-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Agrawal N, et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333:1154–1157. doi: 10.1126/science.1206923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chakraborty A, et al. Casein kinase-2 mediates cell survival through phosphorylation and degradation of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase-2. Pro. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:2205–2209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019381108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaufmann SH. Tuberculosis vaccines: time to think about the next generation. Semin. Immunol. 2013;25:172–181. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mori T, Li Y, Hata H, Ono K, Kochi H. NIRF, a novel RING finger protein, is involved in cell-cycle regulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;296:530–536. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00890-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mori T, Li Y, Hata H, Kochi H. NIRF is a ubiquitin ligase that is capable of ubiquitinating PCNP, a PEST-containing nuclear protein. FEBS Lett. 2004;557:209–214. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01495-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu DD, et al. PEST-containing nuclear protein mediates the proliferation, migration, and invasion of human neuroblastoma cells through MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. Bmc. Cancer. 2018;18:499. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4391-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang X, Blaskovich MA, Forinash KD, Sebti SM. Withacnistin inhibits recruitment of STAT3 and STAT5 to growth factor and cytokine receptors and induces regression of breast tumours. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;111:894–902. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murone M, et al. The multi-kinase inhibitor debio 0617B reduces maintenance and self-renewal of primary human AML CD34+ stem/progenitor cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017;16:1497–1510. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu JH, Zhu BM, Riedlinger G, Kang K, Hennighausen L. The liver-specific tumor suppressor STAT5 controls expression of the reactive oxygen species-generating enzyme NOX4 and the proapoptotic proteins PUMA and BIM in mice. Hepatology. 2012;56:2375–2386. doi: 10.1002/hep.25900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Malin S, et al. Role of STAT5 in controlling cell survival and immunoglobulin gene recombination during pro-B cell development. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:171–179. doi: 10.1038/ni.1827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim C, et al. Formononetin-induced oxidative stress abrogates the activation of STAT3/5 signaling axis and suppresses the tumor growth in multiple myeloma preclinical model. Cancer Lett. 2018;431:123–141. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:528–542. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu D, et al. Hydrogen sulfide and autophagy: a double edged sword. Pharmacol. Res. 2018;131:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cristofani R, et al. Dual role of autophagy on docetaxel-sensitivity in prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:889. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0866-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Raju GSR, et al. Targeting autophagy in gastrointestinal malignancy by using nanomaterials as drug delivery systems. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Venida A, Perera RM. Host control of tumor feeding: autophagy holds the key. Cell. Metab. 2019;29:236–238. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu J, et al. Piperlongumine restores the balance of autophagy and apoptosis by increasing BCL2 phosphorylation in rotenone-induced Parkinson disease models. Autophagy. 2018;14:845–861. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1390636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim BW, et al. The C-terminal region of ATG101 bridges ULK1 and PtdIns3K complex in autophagy initiation. Autophagy. 2018;14:2104–2116. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1504716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Janku F, McConkey DJ, Hong DS, Kurzrock R. Autophagy as a target for anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011;8:528–539. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang S, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein inhibits autophagy to promote malignant behaviour in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1027. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1036-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yeh PS, et al. Honokiol induces autophagy of neuroblastoma cells through activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and endoplasmic reticular stress/ERK1/2 signaling pathways and suppressing cell migration. Cancer Lett. 2016;370:66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shi ZM, et al. Downregulation of miR-218 contributes to epithelial- mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis in lung cancer by targeting Slug/ZEB2 signaling. Oncogene. 2017;36:2577–2588. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y, et al. Novel histone deacetylase inhibitors derived from Magnolia officinalis significantly enhance TRAIL-induced apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;111:113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wei X, et al. GMDS knockdown impairs cell proliferation and survival in human lung adenocarcinoma. Bmc. Cancer. 2018;18:600. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4524-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu D, et al. Hydrogen sulfide in cancer: Friend or foe? Nitric Oxide. 2015;50:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cuda CM, Pope RM, Perlman H. The inflammatory role of phagocyte apoptotic pathways in rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:543–558. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fan CD, et al. Reversal of beta-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells by curcumin, the important role of ROS-mediated signaling and ERK pathway. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;37:211–222. doi: 10.1007/s10571-016-0362-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hayakawa F, et al. A novel STAT inhibitor, OPB-31121, has a significant antitumor effect on leukemia with STAT-addictive oncokinases. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3:e166. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2013.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim C, Baek SH, Um JY, Shim BS, Ahn KS. Resveratrol attenuates constitutive STAT3 and STAT5 activation through induction of PTPε and SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatases and potentiates sorafenib-induced apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17:19. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0233-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xu Y, Lv SX. The effect of JAK2 knockout on inhibition of liver tumor growth by inducing apoptosis, autophagy and anti-proliferation via STATs and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016;84:1202–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xiong H, et al. Inhibition of STAT5 induces G1 cell cycle arrest and reduces tumor cell invasion in human colorectal cancer cells. Lab. Invest. 2009;89:717–725. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lewis KM, et al. Small-molecule targeting of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 to treat non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2015;90:182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Levine B, Green DR, Kroemer G. Pharmacological modulation of autophagy: therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2017;16:487–511. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:651–662. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1205406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.White E, Mehnert JM, Chan CS. Autophagy, metabolism, and cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:5037–5046. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dikic I, Elazar Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:349–364. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Leidal AM, Levine B, Debnath J. Autophagy and the cell biology of age-related disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:1338–1348. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0235-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Heras-Sandoval D, Pérez-Rojas JM, Hernández-Damián J, Pedraza-Chaverri J. The role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the modulation of autophagy and the clearance of protein aggregates in neurodegeneration. Cell. Signal. 2014;26:2694–2701. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Miller I, et al. Ki67 is a graded rather than a binary marker of proliferation versus quiescence. Cell Rep. 2018;24:1105–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dinaux AM, et al. Outcomes of persistent lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for stage III lung cancer. Surgery. 2018;163:784–788. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li Z, et al. TIPE2 suppresses angiogenesis and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invasiveness via inhibiting Rac1 activation and VEGF expression. Oncotarget. 2016;7:62224–62239. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang GY, et al. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced diaphragm dysfunction in rats by reducing apoptosis and inflammation through ROS/MAPK and TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathways. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2018;2018:9647809. doi: 10.1155/2018/9647809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wu D, et al. Hydrogen sulfide acts as a double-edged sword in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells through EGFR/ERK/MMP-2 and PTEN/AKT signaling pathways. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05457-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Heilmann AM, et al. CDK4/6 and IGF1 receptor inhibitors synergize to suppress the growth of p16INK4A-deficient pancreatic cancers. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3947–3958. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ellingson BM, et al. Contrast-enhancing tumor growth dynamics of preoperative, treatment-naive human glioblastoma. Cancer. 2016;122:1718–1727. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Keam B, et al. Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R22. doi: 10.1186/bcr2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tolaney SM, et al. Role of vascular density and normalization in response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab and chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:14325–14330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518808112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncogenesis are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES