Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Mar 14;9:4588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40964-1

Virus-triggered spinal cord demyelination is followed by a peripheral neuropathy resembling features of Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Eva Leitzen 1,2, Barbara B Raddatz 1, Wen Jin 1,2, Sandra Goebbels 3, Klaus-Armin Nave 2,3, Wolfgang Baumgärtner 1,2,, Florian Hansmann 1,2
PMCID: PMC6418285  PMID: 30872675

Abstract

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induces a demyelinating disease in the spinal cord (SC) of susceptible but not in resistant (B6) mouse strains. The aim of the present study was to induce SC demyelination and a peripheral neuropathy in resistant mice by switching the infection site from cerebrum to SC. B6 mice were intraspinally inoculated with TMEV. Infected mice showed clinical signs starting at 7 days post infection (dpi). Histopathology revealed a mononuclear myelitis, centred on the injection site at 3 dpi with subsequent antero- and retrograde spread, accompanied by demyelination and axonal damage within the SC. Virus protein was detected in the SC at all time points. SC inflammation decreased until the end of the investigation period (28 dpi). Concurrent with the amelioration of SC inflammation, the emergence of a peripheral neuropathy, characterized by axonal damage, demyelination and macrophage infiltration, contributing to persistent clinical sings, was observed. Intraspinal TMEV infection of resistant mice induced inflammation, demyelination and delayed viral clearance in the spinal cord and more interestingly, subsequent, virus-triggered inflammation and degeneration within the PN associated with dramatic and progressive clinical signs. The lesions observed in the PN resemble important features of Guillain-Barré syndrome, especially of acute motor/motor-sensory axonal forms.

Introduction

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) was firstly described as a neuropathogenic virus and causative agent of Theiler’s murine encephalitis (TME) in the 1930s by Max Theiler1,2. After experimental intracerebral (i.c.) infection of susceptible mouse strains (e.g. SJL) with the low virulent BeAn-strain of TMEV, animals develop a biphasic disease course consisting of an acute polioencephalitis (early disease) followed by virus persistence associated with chronic demyelination within the spinal cord white matter starting between two and six weeks after infection36. Resistant mouse strains like C57BL/6 (B6) are capable of clearing TMEV from the central nervous system (CNS) during the acute phase of the disease. Thereby, the development of virus persistence, subsequent clinical signs and chronic demyelination within the SC is prevented7,8. The development and progression of TME is determined by numerous factors including the genetic background and the immune response911. Genetic factors contributing to resistance of B6 mice to the development of TMEV-induced demyelinating disease are well known including a more efficient antiviral immune response1215. In this context, numerous studies describe a compartmentalization of the immune response between CNS and periphery during infectious as well as inflammatory diseases1618. Furthermore, significant differences regarding the immune response and glial cell reaction within brain and spinal cord exist which are attributed to various factors including differences between blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) as well as different reaction patterns of microglia/macrophages1922. Following traumatic injury, B6 mice showed a more pronounced BSCB breakdown as well as higher numbers and a more widespread distribution of neutrophils and macrophages within the SC compared to the brain20. Therefore, a change of infection site in the present study from brain to spinal cord (SC) was considered as a possible adjusting parameter for a different disease outcome in resistant B6 mice, especially with regard to the extent of inflammation, demyelination and remyelination. During chronic TME in susceptible mice, remyelination is scarce6,23. The most popular theories explaining the ineffective regeneration postulate a block of oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) differentiation and maturation24,25. OPCs can be identified by their expression of nerve/glial antigen 2 (NG2), also known as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG-4). Migration to the lesion site as well as the maturation of OPCs plays an important role for the initiation and continuation of remyelination2628. Moreover, TMEV injection into the sciatic nerve was followed by demyelination of the PN and virus spread to the SC with emergence of a demyelinating disease29. Several spontaneously occurring as well as experimentally induced animal models of acute inflammatory demyelinating and chronic inflammatory peripheral neuropathies have been described in the literature, even though most of them represent genetic or primarily autoimmune models and only few use viral infections including Gallid Herpesvirus and TMEV as trigger mechanism2932. Some of the models show similarities to the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an entity with several subtypes characterised by demyelination of the PNS and subsequent neurological impairment33,34. The occurrence of GBS is often accompanied by an antecedent infection with bacterial (e.g. Campylobacter jejuni) or viral (e.g. cytomegalovirus, Zika virus) pathogens3336. However, the primary antigenic target of demyelination in GBS is unknown and may be non-identical in affected individuals30,31.

The hypothesis of the present study is that direct intraspinal (i.s.) TMEV infection of resistant B6 mice will lead to demyelination in the SC as a result of a more pronounced inflammatory response compared to intracerebral infection. This would provide a reproducible mouse model to study virus-induced de- and remyelination at early time points mimicking lesions in susceptible mice during the late phase of TME. Moreover, there is the major advantage of harnessing a virus-induced demyelination model on B6 background, since most commercially available knock-in and knock-out mouse strains are only available on this genetic background. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to investigate TMEV-induced de- and remyelination in the SC of a resistant mouse strain, (2) to test the hypothesis of TMEV being capable of spreading to the PNS as well as (3) inducing a peripheral neuropathy after i.s. infection.

Results

Clinical investigation and motor coordination

Clinical scores of TMEV-infected mice were significantly increased starting at 11 dpi until the end of the investigation period (Fig. 1A). Initial clinical signs were characterized by unilateral weakness and lameness, predominantly affecting the hind limbs. Rotarod analysis revealed a significant deterioration of motor coordination in TMEV-infected animals from 7 dpi until the end of investigation period (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clinical investigation of B6 mice following intraspinal TMEV infection. TMEV-infected mice showed significant clinical signs (A, starting at 11 dpi) and a deterioration of motor coordination and performance (B, starting at 7 dpi) compared to mock infected animals. The following number of animals was evaluated per group: n = 25–26 from 0 to 3 dpi; n = 17–20 from 4 to 7 dpi; n = 12–14 from 8 to 28 dpi. The graphs show mean (solid line) and individual value plots indicating the clinical score of each animal consisting of the sum of scores in the categories posture and external appearance, behaviour and activity as well as gait for clinical investigation or a mean round per minute value of three consecutive measurements for rotarod analysis, respectively. Significant differences between the groups as detected by Mann-Whitney U-test are marked by asterisks (p ≤ 0.05).

Spinal cord and peripheral organs

Evaluation of HE stained SC slides revealed increasing numbers of inflammatory cells in TMEV-infected animals. Infected animals showed a polio- and leukomyelitis with predominance of the lesions within the ventral part of the white matter. At all investigated time points TMEV-infected animals showed a significant inflammatory infiltration near the injection site compared to Mock infected animals (Fig. 2A–D). Cervical (rostral) and lumbar (caudal) segments were significantly affected but most prominent at later time points in TMEV-infected animals (14 and 28 dpi), indicating a retro- and anterograde dissemination of inflammation (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Histological changes within the thoracic spinal cord at 3 (A), 7 (B), 14 (C) and 28 (D) days post intraspinal infection with TMEV and the detection of an antero- and retrograde spread. (E) Lesions consisted of meningitis and perivascular accentuated lympho-histiocytic inflammation (AD, asterisks) as well as multifocal dilated myelin sheaths and demyelination indicated by loss of eosinophilia in the white matter (C, arrows). The following number of animals was evaluated per group: n = 6–8 at 3 dpi; n = 5–6 at 7 dpi; n = 6–8 at 14 dpi; n = 6 at 28 dpi. Box-and-whisker plots show median and quartiles. Significant differences between the groups as detected by Mann-Whitney U-test are marked by asterisks (p ≤ 0.05). HE, bars = 100 µm.

Immunohistochemistry was applied for immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells. At the injection site and in the lumbar segment a significant infiltration of T lymphocytes was observed at 3 and 7 dpi. At 14 and 28 dpi all investigated SC segments revealed a significantly increased number of T lymphocytes (Fig. 3A–C). The number of B lymphocytes was significantly increased around the injection site at all investigated time points as well as within cervical and lumbar segments at 14 dpi (Fig. 3D–F). The number of microglia/macrophages was significantly increased around the injection site at 3 dpi, in all investigated segments at 7 and 14 dpi and within cervical and lumbar segments at 28 dpi (Fig. 3G–I).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells within the thoracic spinal cord at 14 days post intraspinal mock (A,D,G,J,M) and TMEV (B,E,H,K,N) injection. Statistical analysis revealed significantly increased numbers of CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD45R (B lymphocytes) and CD107b (microglia/macrophages) positive cells (C,F,I), the presence of virus protein (K, arrow) as well as an accumulation of beta-amyloid-precursor protein (β-APP; N, arrows) in the spinal cord of TMEV-infected animals. The following number of animals was evaluated per group: n = 6–8 at 3 dpi; n = 5–6 at 7 dpi; n = 6–8 at 14 dpi; n = 6 at 28 dpi. Box-and-whisker plots show median and quartiles. Significant differences between the groups as detected by Mann-Whitney U-test are indicated by asterisks (p ≤ 0.05), bars = 100 µm. Inserts in 400x magnification.

Significant numbers of TMEV-positive cells were detected at the injection site at 3 dpi while virus spread to adjacent rostral and caudal segments was present at later time points (Fig. 3J–L). Accumulation of β-APP as a marker for axonal damage was significantly increased at 14 dpi around the injection site in TMEV-infected animals (Fig. 3M–O). Significant demyelination in the SC of TMEV infected animals was detected at 14 and 28 dpi (Fig. 4A,B). The quantification of tdTomato-positive cells at the injection site revealed increasing cell numbers in TMEV-infected and non-infected mice until the end of the investigation period. An accumulation of tdTomato-positive cells around demyelinated foci, predominantly located within the ventral aspect of the thoracic spinal cord, was observed at 14 and 28 dpi (Fig. 4C,D). Significantly increased numbers of td-Tomato-positive cells were detected within the thoracic segment of TMEV infected animals between 14 and 28 dpi. An accumulation of PRX-positive cells was detected around lesion sites in TMEV-infected animals while mock-infected mice did not show PRX-positive cells in the spinal cord (Fig. 4E,F). Decreasing inflammatory cell numbers within the SC at the end of the investigation period contrasted with the persistent deterioration of clinical signs in TMEV infected mice indicating additional causes for their clinical impairment. Histopathological investigation of peripheral organs (esophagus, trachea, thyroid, parathyroid, thymus, heart, spleen, liver, stomach, pancreas, small and large intestine, lymph nodes (mesenteric, subiliac, cervical, mandibular, lumbar, mediastinal), kidneys, genital organs including mammary gland, urinary bladder, skeletal muscle, skin, salivary gland, tongue, nose, bone and bone marrow) revealed no significant alterations in all animals. To further disclose the underlying mechanisms of clinical deterioration peripheral nerves were investigated in detail.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Detection of de- and potential approaches for remyelination. Demyelination (arrow) was identified using immunohistochemistry targeting myelin basic protein (MBP; A,B). Areas with inflammation and demyelination were infiltrated by tdTomato-positive glial cells as well as Periaxin-positive Schwann cells (arrowheads; CF), bars = 100 µm. Inserts in 400x magnification.

Peripheral nerves

Degenerative and reactive changes including vacuolization, demyelination, spheroids, macrophages and myelinophagia were detected at the proximal and middle aspect of the PN of TMEV infected animals. Moreover, PN showed an increased cellularity at 14 and 28 dpi (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Investigation of peripheral nerves revealed a vacuolization of nerve fibers as well as an increased cellularity due to infiltration of inflammatory cells at 14 (A,B) and 28 (C,D) days post intraspinal TMEV infection. The number of inflammatory cells is presented as average number per high power field (HPF; E). For quantification of vacuolization, a semiquantitative scale was used (0 = no vacuoles; 1 =  ≤3 vacuoles per HPF); 2 =  <10% of nerve area per HPF affected, 3 = 10–20% of nerve area per HPF affected; 4 = 20–30% of nerve area per HPF affected; 5 = 30–40% of nerve area per HPF affected; (F). The following number of animals was evaluated per group: n = 6–8 at 3 dpi; n = 5–6 at 7 dpi; n = 6–8 at 14 dpi; n = 6 at 28 dpi. Data are presented as box-and-whisker plots showing median and quartiles. Significant differences between groups as detected by Mann-Whitney U-test were indicated by asterisks (p ≤ 0.05). Bars = 20 µm.

Immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells in PN of TMEV-infected animals revealed an increased density of CD107b positive cells within the plexus brachiales at 14 dpi and within all PN at 28 dpi (Fig. 6A–C) while only single CD3 and/or CD45R positive cells were present (data not shown).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Quantification of macrophages (CD107b), axonal damage (beta-amyloid-precursor-protein, β-APP) and demyelination (myelin basic protein, MBP) in peripheral nerves at 28 days post inoculation (dpi). Inflammation consisting of an infiltration of macrophages within peripheral nerves was detected at 14 and 28 dpi (AC). TMEV infected animals showed significant axonal damage (DF) as well as demyelination (GI) at 14 and 28 dpi. The following number of animals was evaluated per group: n = 6–8 at 3 dpi; n = 5–6 at 7 dpi; n = 6–8 at 14 dpi; n = 6 at 28 dpi. Data are presented as box-and-whisker plots showing median and quartiles. Significant differences between groups detected by Mann-Whitney U-test were indicated by asterisks (p ≤ 0.05). Bars = 20 µm.

Significant accumulation of β-APP within PN of TMEV-infected animals was detected at 14 dpi in plexus brachiales and nervi ischiadici as well as within the nervi ischiadici at 28 dpi. (Fig. 5D–F). 2/26 TMEV infected animals showed single TMEV-positive fibers at 7 and 14 dpi, respectively. Significant demyelination as indicated by an increased MBP negative area was detected at 14 and 28 dpi.

Discussion

Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis induced demyelinating disease represents a well-established animal model for the progressive forms of multiple sclerosis and virus-mediated demyelination8,37,38. Since resistant mouse strains like B6 lack demyelinating CNS lesions following intracerebral infection the hypothesis of the present study was that an intraspinal infection would lead to demyelinating SC lesions similar to those observed in SJL mice during the chronic phase of TME2,8,12,39,40.

Clinical investigation and motor coordination

Significant clinical impairment in intraspinally TMEV-infected B6 mice was firstly perceived as a decrease in rotarod performance at 7 dpi while a significant deterioration of clinical signs was observed at 11 dpi. This might indicate a higher sensitivity of the rotarod test compared to the applied clinical scoring system following intraspinal infection. In comparison, after i.c. infection of SJL-mice, animals showed marked reduction in motor strength as late as 42 to 70 dpi in association with virus persistence, SC inflammation, demyelination and axonal damage23,41,42. In contrast, intraspinally infected mice showed an earlier onset of clinical signs at 11 dpi, which included waddling gait, ataxia, spasticity and paralysis of hind limbs, matching the clinical features seen in SJL mice during the late phase of the disease4,8,37. The rather rapid deterioration of clinical signs between days 7 and 12 may be attributed to the combination of increasing SC inflammation and onset of PN lesions.

Spinal cord

Composition and localization of inflammatory lesions consisted predominantly of T lymphocytes and microglia/macrophages, thereby mimicking the inflammatory pattern in susceptible mice during the late phase of TME6,8,43. The presence of B lymphocytes was less pronounced and mostly restricted to the injection site. Following intraspinal TMEV-infection inflammation as well as virus protein are mainly localized within the white matter. This is in contrast to studies investigating the acute phase of TME in B6 mice following i.c. infection44. B6 mice are known for being capable of clearing TMEV from the CNS within approximately 2 to 3 weeks post i.c. infection8,45. In the present study TMEV antigen was detectable - even though scarcely - in SC tissue at 28 dpi. This raises the question why the elimination of TMEV following intraspinal infection is delayed in comparison to virus elimination following intracerebral infection. The reason for the dissemination of TMEV within the SC associated with delayed virus elimination may be related to several factors including a different cell tropism with earlier involvement of microglia/macrophages thereby enabling and fostering an extended virus persistence and spread. The regulation of virus persistence includes a complex virus-host interaction, which is determined among others by the effectiveness of the antiviral innate and adaptive immune response in combination with the genetic background of the mouse strain4648.

Resistant B6 mice without experimental manipulation e.g. CD8 ablation49 neither develop demyelinating lesions within the brain nor in the SC following intracerebral infection due to a rapid virus elimination triggered by a strong antiviral immune response14,40,43. However, the present study shows that the localization of infection (brain versus SC) has a major impact upon the pathogenesis of TME since intraspinal infection of B6 mice was followed by demyelinating SC lesions as well as inflammatory and degenerative lesions within the PN. The observed differences in the pathogenesis of TME following i.s. versus i.c. infection may be related to region specific differences of the immune response as also described in other studies leading to a prolonged presence of TMEV within the CNS16,18,20,22,50. After i.s. infection of B6 mice, a caudal and rostral dissemination of inflammation was detected with demyelinating lesions in association with inflammation. Significant demyelination occurred at 14 dpi, coinciding with the most prominent inflammatory changes.

Virus persistence in the SC of susceptible mouse strains is an important requirement for the development of demyelinating SC lesions since the underlying mechanisms are suggested to be immune-mediated including epitope spreading as well as molecular mimicry15,51. Previous studies in B6 mice showed that virus persistence could be prolonged and clinical sings induced by combining intracerebral infection with intraperitoneal administration of bacterial LPS or interleukin-152. Therefore, in the present study virus persistence may have contributed to spinal cord lesions by similar mechanisms as observed in susceptible mice.

In the CNS, demyelinating events are followed by an initial phase of OPC recruitment followed by differentiation of NG2-positive OPCs into myelinating oligodendrocytes53,54. Demyelinating lesions in the chronic phase of TME in susceptible SJL mice show increased numbers of NG2-positive cells but - at the same time - only a very limited amount of remyelination mainly by oligodendrocytes and - to a lesser extent - Schwann cells6,5557. In the present study, a lesion-associated, significantly increased number of tdTomato-positive cells in TMEV-infected mice was detected in the thoracic spinal cord at 28 compared to 14 dpi. This finding is consistent with other studies investigating different forms of SC injury and may be interpreted as an early regenerative approach58,59. In addition to perilesional tdTomato-positive cells, a sparse, accumulation of PRX-positive Schwann cells was detected indicating a contribution of Schwann cells to remyelination in B6 mice as known from SJL mice during chronic TME60.

Peripheral nerves

Intracerebral TMEV infection of resistant B6 mice leads to significant lesions in the CNS, mainly an acute polioencephalitis, while lesions in peripheral organs including PN were not detected40. The degree of SC inflammation and demyelination decreased after 14 dpi in the present study while the clinical impairment remained on a high level. These findings in combination with the emergence of a peripheral neuropathy were rather surprising. PN showed degenerative as well as inflammatory lesions characterized by a dominant infiltration of macrophages. In addition, axonal degeneration indicated by an accumulation of β-APP as well as a significant demyelination was observed within the PN at 14 and 28 dpi. In the present study, PN lesions may be triggered by both, an outside-in as well as an inside-out mechanism61. Virus antigen was detected in single nerve fibers of 2/26 TMEV infected animals (one at 7 and one at 14 dpi) indicating that virus spread from the SC to the PN represents a rare event. This raises the question whether the pathomechanism of PN damage is related to a spread of inflammation from the CNS to the PNS or the inflammatory response within the PN is part of a compartmentalized, CNS independent peripheral immune response.

Diseases of the PNS are classified with regard to the affected components, speed of development, causative agents and clinical signs. GBS is a rare but potentially life threatening disease with several subtypes characterised by primary or secondary axonal degeneration and myelin loss within the PNS resulting in neurological impairment like flaccid paralysis and areflexia3234. The different subtypes are divided into an acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (AIDP), representing the most common type of GBS, and acute motor/motor-sensory axonal forms (AMAN/AMSAN) with regard to the types of nerve fibers involved and the predominant manifestation of fiber injury demyelinating versus axonal62,63. Within AIDP the proximal parts of the PN are affected by lymphocytic inflammation and macrophage-associated demyelination whereas AMAN/AMSAN show only little numbers of lymphocytes as well as sparing of dorsal nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia63. Campylobacter jejuni, the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis in developed countries is the most frequently suspected causative agent but several other bacterial as well as viral pathogens are thought to be possible antecedent triggers of GBS34. Recent studies suggest a causal link between ZIKA virus infection as a predisposition for GBS pointing out a concomitant high actuality of virus-triggered neuropathies64,65. Marek’s disease (MD), a herpesvirus infection in chicken, is known to entail a demyelinating disease of PN resembling those seen in experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN), the first known animal model for GBS66. Despite the high number of potential viral pathogens, only few virus-triggered models of GBS are available and have been described in detail. The observed peripheral nerve lesions in intraspinally TMEV infected mice share several features of GBS such as axonal damage, inflammation and demyelination thereby representing a valuable tool to study virus-mediated PN lesions in immunocompetent B6 mice.

Conclusions

In this study, B6 mice developed significant clinical signs, demyelinating lesions in the SC as well as PN lesions without any additional treatment like immunosuppression or immune stimulation. Major advantages of i.s. infection are the short time span between infection and lesion development in the SC as well as the emergence of a peripheral neuropathy. PN lesions including axonal damage, macrophage infiltration and demyelination shared features of GBS resembling the primary axonal types (AMAN/AMSAN) with a macrophage dominated, inflammatory response. Therefore, this model may serve as a suitable tool for further investigations of virus triggered PN lesions.

Material and Methods

Four to five week old female C57BL/6.NG2CreERT2xRosa26.floxed.stop-tdTomato double heterozygous mice27 were randomly assigned to groups using the random function in Microsoft Excel. Animals were continuously fed with a special diet containing tamoxifen citrate (TD55125, 400 mg/kg tamoxifen citrate; envigo, Indianapolis, United States) ad libitum, starting at seven days prior to i.s. TMEV inoculation, inducing a permanent tdTomato expression in NG2-Cre-transgenic cells. Animals (n = 51) were randomly assigned to treatment groups and housed in an individually ventilated cage system (Tecniplast, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany) with free access to drinking water. Group size varied from five to eight animals for each investigated time point and treatment (infected vs. mock).

Infection and virus

A hemilaminectomy and stereotaxic inoculation at the level of the tenth thoracic vertebra was performed as previously described67. Animals were i.s. infected with 4.56 × 103 plaque-forming units of the BeAn strain of TMEV/animal. The control group (mock) received an equivalent fluid volume of cell culture supernatant. Surgical procedures were performed under general anaesthesia using medetomidine (0.05 mg/kg; Domitor®, Orion Pharma, Espoo, Finland) and ketamine (10 mg/kg; Ketamin 10%, bela-pharm, Vechta, Germany) as well as analgetic treatment with Tramadol-Ratiopharm® (15 mg/kg; Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany) and Carprofen (4 mg/kg; Rimadyl®, Pfizer, New York City, New York, United States). During anaesthesia, eyes were covered with ointment (Bepanthen® Augen- und Nasensalbe, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). After operation, animals received analgesia via drinking water (Tramadol-Ratiopharm®, 1 mg/ml; Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany).

Clinical investigation

Clinical investigation was performed daily and covered the categories posture and external appearance (0 = normal posture; smooth and shiny coat, firmly lying to the body; 1 = normal posture; shaggy and dull coat; 2 = mildly hunched back; shaggy and dull coat; 3 = markedly hunched back; shaggy, dull and soiled coat), behaviour and activity (0 = attentive and curious; 1 = very calm: mildly reduced spontaneous locomotion, no reduced induced movement; 2 = apathy: moderately reduced spontaneous locomotion, mildly reduced induced movement; 3 = stupor: no spontaneous locomotion, little induced movement) and gait (0 = normal motion sequence; 1 = mild paresis of hind limbs: occasionally observable mild unsteady gait (swaying, stumbling, falling, shortened steps); partially only apparent when climbing at cage; 2 = moderate to severe paresis of hind limbs: frequently observable unsteady gait (swaying, stumbling, falling, shortened steps); 3 = severe paresis of hind limbs or spinal ataxia: frequently observable moderate to marked unsteady gait (swaying, stumbling, falling, shortened steps); delayed standing up from supine position; 4 = paralysis of one hind limb or high-grade spinal ataxia; spastic paresis of more than one limb; marked delay in standing up from supine position). The clinical score represents the sum of the three categories.

Rotarod performance test

For rotarod performance test (RotaRod Treadmill, TSE Technical & Scientific Equipment, Bad Homburg, Germany), mice were trained at −5 dpi and −3 dpi for 10 minutes each with a constant speed of 5 or 10 rounds per minute (RPM), respectively. Investigations at 0 (before surgery), 7, 14 and 28 dpi were performed using an accelerated rotarod test (increased rotation speed from 5 to 55 RPM over a time span of 5 minutes). For statistics, a mean value of three consecutive runs was calculated.

Tissue processing

Animals were perfused with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Tissue samples of SC including injection site (T9–11), cervical (C1–C3) and lumbar (L3-S4) segments, PN (proximal and middle part of plexus brachiales and nervi ischiadici) as well as other organs (esophagus, trachea, thyroid, parathyroid, thymus, heart, spleen, liver, stomach, pancreas, small and large intestine, lymph nodes (mesenteric, subiliac, cervical, mandibular, lumbar, mediastinal), kidneys, genital organs including mammary gland, urinary bladder, skeletal muscle, skin, salivary gland, tongue, nose, bone and bone marrow) were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) for further investigation. Serial slices of SC and PN were cut and subsequently stained using hematoxylin and eosin (HE). In addition, immunohistochemistry was performed using a marker panel summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry.

Antigen, Target Company; product number; clone Blocking Serum Pre-treatment Dilution 2nd antibody (1:200)
TMEV Goat 1:2000 Goat anti-rabbit
LivingColors DsRed, TdTomato Takara Bio Europe/Clontech 632496 Goat Microwave, 20 minutes, citrate buffer 1:500 Goat anti-rabbit
β-APP,
axonal damage
Merck/Millipore MAB348 Goat Microwave, 20 minutes, citrate buffer 1:2000 Goat anti-mouse
Periaxin,
Schwann cells
Sigma HPA001868 Goat Microwave, 20 minutes, citrate buffer 1:5000 Goat anti-rabbit
CD3,
T lymphocytes
Dako/Agilent Technologies A0452 Goat Microwave, 20 minutes, citrate buffer 1:250 Goat anti-rabbit
CD45R,
B lymphocytes
BD Bioscience 553085 Goat Microwave, 20 minutes, citrate buffer 1:1000
CD107b,
microglia/macrophages
Bio Rad MCA2293 Goat Microwave, 20 minutes, citrate buffer 1:400 Goat anti-rat
MBP,
myelin
Chemicon AB980 Goat 1:500 Goat anti-rabbit

TMEV = Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus; β-APP = beta-amyloid-precursor protein; MBP = myelin basic protein.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described6,68,69. Antigen retrieval, if required, was performed by incubating slides in boiling citrate buffer in a microwave, followed by application of inactivated goat serum. Avidin-biotin-peroxidase reagent (Vectastain ABC Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, United States) as well as 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) were used for visualization of antigen-antibody reactions. For visualization of TMEV (virus protein), tdTomato-positive cells (OPCs and matured stages), beta-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP; axonal damage), Periaxin (PRX, Schwann cells), CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD45R (B lymphocytes), CD107b (microglia/macrophages) and myelin basic protein (MBP; myelin) primary antibodies (Table 1) were diluted in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin.

Histological examination

Inflammation was semiquantitatively evaluated on HE stained transversal SC sections. The applied scoring system included four identical categories for white and grey matter (0 = normal; 1 = single perivascular infiltrates; 2 = 2–3 layers of perivascular infiltrates; 3 = >3 layers of perivascular infiltrates). Semiquantitative scores were averaged for each category and cross section.

For immunohistochemical detection of TMEV, CD3, CD45R, CD107b, Periaxin and β-APP within the SC, positive cells or axons were counted manually for each cross section, respectively. TdTomato-positive glial cells were also manually counted and quantified in the thoracic segment. Quantification of demyelination was performed using analySIS® 3.2 software (SOFT Imaging System; Olympus, Münster, Germany). Slides were digitalized, MBP-negative areas manually outlined and quantified.

PN were investigated for inflammatory and degenerative changes using HE staining and immunohistochemistry. For CD3, CD45R, CD107b as well as β-APP the density of positive cells or axons per mm² was calculated. Morphometry quantifying myelin loss was performed using analySIS® in the most affected HPF.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS for Windows version 24 (IBM® SPSS® Statistics, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Normal distribution was tested via Kolmogorov-Smirnov- and Shapiro-Wilk-test, followed by Mann-Whitney-U post hoc tests. Statistical significance was accepted at a p-value of  ≤0.05.

Ethics statement

Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the German Animal Welfare Law and all experiments were approved by the local authorities (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES), Oldenburg, Germany, permission number: 33.12-42502-04-15/1996).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank U. Bode, C. Casper, J. Domdey, P. Grünig, C. Herrmann, K. Lange, C. Namneck, K. Rohn, C. Schütz, K. Schöne and D. Waschke for excellent technical assistance. This study was in part supported by the Niedersachsen-Research Network on Neuroinfectiology (N-RENNT) of the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony. This publication was further supported by German Research Foundation and University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation within the funding program Open Access Publishing. Eva Leitzen received a scholarship by the Cusanuswerk Bonn.

Author Contributions

W.B., F.H., S.G. and K.-A.N. were involved in the study design. S.G. and K.-A.N. characterized and provided the mice. E.L., B.B.R., W.J. and F.H. conducted the experiments. E.L. and F.H. wrote the manuscript and prepared the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Theiler M. Spontaneous encephalomyelitis of mice - a new virus disease. Science. 1934;80:122. doi: 10.1126/science.80.2066.122-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Theiler M. Spontaneous encephalomyelitis of mice, a new virus disease. J Exp Med. 1937;65:705–719. doi: 10.1084/jem.65.5.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lipton HL. Theilers Virus-Infection in Mice: an Unusual Biphasic Disease Process Leading to Demyelination. Infect Immun. 1975;11:1147–1155. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.5.1147-1155.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lipton HL, Dal Canto MC. Susceptibility of inbred mice to chronic central nervous system infection by Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus. Infect Immun. 1979;26:369–374. doi: 10.1128/iai.26.1.369-374.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roussarie JP, Ruffie C, Brahic M. The role of myelin in Theiler’s virus persistence in the central nervous system. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e23. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ulrich R, Seeliger F, Kreutzer M, Germann PG, Baumgärtner W. Limited remyelination in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis due to insufficient oligodendroglial differentiation of nerve/glial antigen 2 (NG2)-positive putative oligodendroglial progenitor cells. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2008;34:603–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2008.00956.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jafari M, et al. Impact of Theiler’s virus infection on hippocampal neuronal progenitor cells: differential effects in two mouse strains. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2012;38:647–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2012.01256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oleszak EL, Chang JR, Friedman H, Katsetos CD, Platsoucas CD. Theiler’s virus infection: a model for multiple sclerosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:174–207. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.174-207.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsunoda I, et al. Three immune-mediated disease models induced by Theiler’s virus: Multiple sclerosis, seizures and myocarditis. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2016;7:330–345. doi: 10.1111/cen3.12341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gilli F, Li L, Campbell SJ, Anthony DC, Pachner AR. The effect of B-cell depletion in the Theiler’s model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2015;359:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jin YH, Kang HS, Hou W, Meng L, Kim BS. The level of viral infection of antigen-presenting cells correlates with the level of development of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced demyelinating disease. J Virol. 2015;89:1867–1878. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02471-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brahic M, Bureau JF, Michiels T. The genetics of the persistent infection and demyelinating disease caused by Theiler’s virus. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:279–298. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carpentier PA, Getts MT, Miller SD. Pro-inflammatory functions of astrocytes correlate with viral clearance and strain-dependent protection from TMEV-induced demyelinating disease. Virology. 2008;375:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.01.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Herder V, et al. Interleukin-10 expression during the acute phase is a putative prerequisite for delayed viral elimination in a murine model for multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;249:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jin YH, et al. Differential virus replication, cytokine production, and antigen-presenting function by microglia from susceptible and resistant mice infected with Theiler’s virus. J Virol. 2007;81:11690–11702. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01034-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Navarrete-Talloni MJ, et al. Transient peripheral immune response and central nervous system leaky compartmentalization in a viral model for multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:890–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2010.00383.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fitzner D, Simons M. Chronic progressive multiple sclerosis - pathogenesis of neurodegeneration and therapeutic strategies. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2010;8:305–315. doi: 10.2174/157015910792246218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lassmann H, Brück W, Lucchinetti CF. The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: an overview. Brain Pathol. 2007;17:210–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00064.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stein VM, et al. Variations on brain microglial gene expression of MMPs, RECK, and TIMPs in inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases in dogs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011;144:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schnell L, Fearn S, Klassen H, Schwab ME, Perry VH. Acute inflammatory responses to mechanical lesions in the CNS: differences between brain and spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11:3648–3658. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tatar I, Chou PC, Desouki MM, El Sayed H, Bilgen M. Evaluating regional blood spinal cord barrier dysfunction following spinal cord injury using longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. BMC Med Imaging. 2009;9:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-9-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schnell L, Fearn S, Schwab ME, Perry VH, Anthony DC. Cytokine-induced acute inflammation in the brain and spinal cord. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58:245–254. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199903000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ulrich R, Kalkuhl A, Deschl U, Baumgärtner W. Machine learning approach identifies new pathways associated with demyelination in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:434–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00646.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Franklin RJ, Ffrench-Constant C. Remyelination in the CNS: from biology to therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:839–855. doi: 10.1038/nrn2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun Y, et al. STAT3 represents a molecular switch possibly inducing astroglial instead of oligodendroglial differentiation of oligodendroglial progenitor cells in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015;41:347–370. doi: 10.1111/nan.12133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Biname F. Transduction of extracellular cues into cell polarity: the role of the transmembrane proteoglycan NG2. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;50:482–493. doi: 10.1007/s12035-013-8610-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang W, et al. Novel NG2-CreERT2 knock-in mice demonstrate heterogeneous differentiation potential of NG2 glia during development. Glia. 2014;62:896–913. doi: 10.1002/glia.22648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Crawford AH, Chambers C, Franklin RJ. Remyelination: the true regeneration of the central nervous system. J Comp Pathol. 2013;149:242–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Drescher KM, Tracy SM. Injection of the sciatic nerve with TMEV: a new model for peripheral nerve demyelination. Virology. 2007;359:233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lampert PW. Autoimmune and virus-induced demyelinating diseases. A review. Am J Pathol. 1978;91:176–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schafflick D, Kieseier BC, Wiendl H, Meyer Zu Horste G. Novel pathomechanisms in inflammatory neuropathies. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:232. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-1001-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Soliven B. Animal models of autoimmune neuropathy. ILAR J. 2014;54:282–290. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pithadia AB, Kakadia N. Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) Pharmacol Rep. 2010;62:220–232. doi: 10.1016/S1734-1140(10)70261-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yuki N. Infectious origins of, and molecular mimicry in, Guillain-Barre and Fisher syndromes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1:29–37. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.de Souza AS, et al. Imaging findings in congenital Zika virus infection syndrome: an update. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34:85–93. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3637-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Resiere D, et al. Cardiovascular complications in patients with Zika virus-induced Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Clin Virol. 2018;98:8–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dal Canto MC, Kim BS, Miller SD, Melvold RW. Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induced demyelination: a model for human multiple sclerosis. Methods. 1996;10:453–461. doi: 10.1006/meth.1996.0123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502–1517. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Drescher KM, Tracy S. Establishment of a model to examine the early events involved in the development of virus-induced demyelinating lesions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1103:152–156. doi: 10.1196/annals.1394.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kummerfeld M, et al. Periventricular demyelination and axonal pathology is associated with subependymal virus spread in a murine model for multiple sclerosis. Intervirology. 2012;55:401–416. doi: 10.1159/000336563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hansmann F, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-12 deficiency ameliorates the clinical course and demyelination in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124:127–142. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-0942-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Herder V, et al. Cuprizone inhibits demyelinating leukomyelitis by reducing immune responses without virus exacerbation in an infectious model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;244:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mecha M, Carrillo-Salinas FJ, Mestre L, Feliu A, Guaza C. Viral models of multiple sclerosis: neurodegeneration and demyelination in mice infected with Theiler’s virus. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;101–102:46–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tsunoda I, Fujinami RS. Neuropathogenesis of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus infection, an animal model for multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2010;5:355–369. doi: 10.1007/s11481-009-9179-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Getts MT, Richards MH, Miller SD. A critical role for virus-specific CD8(+) CTLs in protection from Theiler’s virus-induced demyelination in disease-susceptible SJL mice. Virology. 2010;402:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim BS, et al. IL-1 signal affects both protection and pathogenesis of virus-induced chronic CNS demyelinating disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:217. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ransohoff RM, et al. Chemokine expression in the central nervous system of mice with a viral disease resembling multiple sclerosis: roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and viral persistence. J Virol. 2002;76:2217–2224. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.5.2217-2224.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Son KN, Liang Z, Lipton HL. SJL bone marrow-derived macrophages do not have IRF3 mutations and are highly susceptible to Theiler’s virus infection. Virology. 2017;512:21–24. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ciurkiewicz M, et al. Cytotoxic CD8(+) T cell ablation enhances the capacity of regulatory T cells to delay viral elimination in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis. Brain Pathol. 2018;28:349–368. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Olson JK. Immune response by microglia in the spinal cord. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1198:271–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Croxford JL, Olson JK, Miller SD. Epitope spreading and molecular mimicry as triggers of autoimmunity in the Theiler’s virus-induced demyelinating disease model of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2002;1:251–260. doi: 10.1016/S1568-9972(02)00080-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pullen LC, Park SH, Miller SD, Dal Canto MC, Kim BS. Treatment with bacterial LPS renders genetically resistant C57BL/6 mice susceptible to Theiler’s virus-induced demyelinating disease. J Immunol. 1995;155:4497–4503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Franklin RJM. Why does remyelination fail in multiple sclerosis? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:705–714. doi: 10.1038/nrn917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Polito A, Reynolds R. NG2-expressing cells as oligodendrocyte progenitors in the normal and demyelinated adult central nervous system. J Anat. 2005;207:707–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00454.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McGavern DB, Murray PD, Rodriguez M. Quantitation of spinal cord demyelination, remyelination, atrophy, and axonal loss in a model of progressive neurologic injury. J Neurosci Res. 1999;58:492–504. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19991115)58:4&#x0003c;492::AID-JNR3&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Raddatz BB, et al. Central Nervous System Demyelination and Remyelination is Independent from Systemic Cholesterol Level in Theiler’s Murine Encephalomyelitis. Brain Pathol. 2016;26:102–119. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Prayoonwiwat N, Rodriguez M. The potential for oligodendrocyte proliferation during demyelinating disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1993;52:55–63. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199301000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Levine J. The reactions and role of NG2 glia in spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2016;1638:199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rodriguez JP, et al. Abrogation of beta-catenin signaling in oligodendrocyte precursor cells reduces glial scarring and promotes axon regeneration after CNS injury. J Neurosci. 2014;34:10285–10297. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4915-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dal Canto MC, Melvold RW, Kim BS, Miller SD. Two models of multiple sclerosis: experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) and Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) infection. A pathological and immunological comparison. Microsc Res Tech. 1995;32:215–229. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070320305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tsunoda I, Fujinami RS. Inside-out versus outside-in models for virus induced demyelination: axonal damage triggering demyelination. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2002;24:105–125. doi: 10.1007/s00281-002-0105-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chareyre J, et al. Acute axonal neuropathy subtype of Guillain Barre syndrome in a French pediatric series: Adequate follow-up may require repetitive electrophysiological studies. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21:891–897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ. Guillain-Barre syndrome and variants. Neurol Clin. 2013;31:491–510. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Barbi L, Coelho AVC, Alencar LCA, Crovella S. Prevalence of Guillain-Barre syndrome among Zika virus infected cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2018;22:137–141. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cao-Lormeau V-M, et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study. Lancet. 2016;387:1531–1539. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00562-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lampert P, Garrett R, Powell H. Demyelination in allergic and Marke’s disease virus induced neuritis comparative electron microscopic studies. Acta Neuropathol. 1977;40:103–110. doi: 10.1007/bf00688697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kuypers NJ, James KT, Enzmann GU, Magnuson DS, Whittemore SR. Functional consequences of ethidium bromide demyelination of the mouse ventral spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 2013;247:615–622. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hansmann F, et al. Highly malignant behavior of a murine oligodendrocyte precursor cell line following transplantation into the demyelinated and nondemyelinated central nervous system. Cell Transplant. 2012;21:1161–1175. doi: 10.3727/096368911X627444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kummerfeld M, Meens J, Haas L, Baumgärtner W, Beineke A. Generation and characterization of a polyclonal antibody for the detection of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus by light and electron microscopy. J Virol Methods. 2009;160:185–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES