Recently in Critical Care, Sugita et al. confirmed the previously reported positive association between high HMGB-1 (high-mobility group box-1) levels and a poor neurological outcome in post–cardiac arrest (post-CA) patients [1]. Although we applaud this excellent study, we would like to make some comments. Brain damage after out-of-hospital CA is a leading cause of mortality and long-term neurological disability in survivors. Primary injury is caused by an immediate shutdown of cerebral blood flow. In the hours and days following CA, systemic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced processes may culminate in secondary neuronal cell death [2]. HMGB-1, a typical damage-associated molecular pattern protein, is crucial in inflammation and is critically involved in thrombosis and also mediates systemic organ I/R. Interestingly, almost half of the patients resuscitated after CA may develop acute kidney injury (AKI). More than 75% of AKI episodes occurred within 3 days after CA and about one third of these patients eventually needed continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) [3]. Sugita et al. did not mention the incidence of AKI or need of (C)RRT. However, given the high number of patients in shock (75% of patients with a Glasgow–Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Categories Scale (CPC) score of 3 to 5 were on vasopressors!), it is reasonable to assume that a substantial number developed AKI or needed (C)RRT or both. With a molecular weight of 30 kDa, HMGB-1 is not eliminated by convective CRRT. However, Yumoto et al. showed that more than 90% of HMGB-1 was cleared from the circulation by highly adsorbent surface-treated polyacrylonitrile and polymethylmethacrylate membranes but that no such removal was observed with the less adsorptive polysulfone membranes [4]. Although polysulfone hemofilters are most commonly used for CRRT in Japan [5], implementing highly adsorbent filters would result in much lower serum HMGB-1 levels in post-CA patients. This not only would challenge the conclusions made by Sugita et al. but also could affect patient outcome since an extensive elimination of HMGB-1 may theoretically subdue the I/R-related post-CA injurious process.
Acknowledgments
None.
Funding
None.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- AKI
Acute kidney injury
- CA
Cardiac arrest
- (C)RRT
(Continuous) renal replacement therapy
- HMGB-1
High-mobility group box-1
- I/R
Ischemia/Reperfusion
Authors’ contributions
PMH and HDS designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Footnotes
See related research by Sugita et al., https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-017-1828-5.
Contributor Information
Patrick M. Honore, Phone: 0032/2/4775444, Email: patrick.honore@chu-brugmann.be
David De Bels, Email: david.debels@chu-brugmann.be.
Luc Kugener, Email: luc.kugener@chu-brugmann.be.
Sebastien Redant, Email: sebastien.redant@chu-brugmann.be.
Rachid Attou, Email: rachid.attou@chu-brugmann.be.
Andrea Gallerani, Email: andrea.gallerani@chu-brugmann.be.
Herbert D. Spapen, Email: herbert.spapen@vub.be
References
- 1.Sugita A, Kinoshita K, Sakurai A, Chiba N, Yamaguchi J, Kuwana T, et al. Systemic impact on secondary brain aggravation due to ischemia/reperfusion injury in post-cardiac arrest syndrome: a prospective observational study using high-mobility group box 1 protein. Crit Care. 2017;21:247. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1828-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Griesdale DE. Clinical pathophysiology of hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest: a “two-hit” model. Crit Care. 2017;21:90. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1670-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tujjar O, Mineo G, Dell’Anna A, Poyatos-Robles B, Donadello K, Scolletta S, et al. Acute kidney injury after cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2015;19:169. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0900-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yumoto M, Nishida O, Moriyama K, Shimomura Y, Nakamura T, Kuriyama N, et al. In vitro evaluation of high mobility group box 1 protein removal with various membranes for continuous hemofiltration. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;15:385–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00971.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yasuda H, Sekine K, Abe T, Suzaki S, Katsumi A, Harada N, et al. Comparison of two polysulfone membranes for continuous renal replacement therapy for sepsis: a prospective cross-over study. Renal Replacement Therapy. 2018;4:6. doi: 10.1186/s41100-018-0148-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
