Abstract
Background
Polyherbal standardised extracts used in ethnomedicine of Eastern Nigeria for memory improvements were evaluated for anti-cholinesterases and anti-oxidant properties.
Methods
Anti-cholinesterase, anti-oxidant, and total phenolic and flavonoid contents were established using standard procedures.
Results
The three polyherbal extracts exhibited significant concentration dependent acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity (P = 0.001). The highest AChE inhibition was observed with the Neocare Herbal Tea (NHT) with 99.7% (IC50 = 324 μg/mL); whereas the Herbalin Complex Tea (HCT) and Phytoblis Herbal Tea (PHT) exhibited 73.8% (IC50 = 0.2 μg/mL) and 60.6% (IC50 = 0.7 μg/mL) inhibition, respectively, relative to eserine at 100% inhibition (IC50 = 0.9 μg/mL) at 200 μg/mL. The order of percentage increase in inhibition of AChE was NHT > HCT > PHT; while the order of decrease in potency was HCT > PHT > NHT.
Radical scavenging activities of HCT, NHT and PHT were 82.13% (IC50 = 0.08 μg/mL), 77.43% (IC50 = 0.01 μg/mL) and 76.28% (IC50 = 0.3 μg/mL), respectively, at 1 mg/mL concentrations. The reducing power revealed a dose-dependent effect, with NHT > PHT > HCT. The order of total phenolics content in the extracts were PHT > HCT > NHT, and for total flavonoids content: PHT > NHT > HCT.
Conclusion
The three polyherbal standardised products possess significant acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity and secondary metabolites that could collectively contribute to their memory-enhancing effects.
Keywords: anti-cholinesterases, anti-oxidants, memory improvement, phenolics, polyherbal
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Herbal medicines have witnessed a substantive growth in popularity underscored by their efficacy in alleviating a plethora of ailments. This increased usage likely reflects their availability, acceptability, and limited side effects (1). Basic healthcare needs, such as drugs, are in short supply in many developing countries and a large proportion of the population patronise traditional and alternative medicine practitioners. Attractive packaging and unregulated advertisement of herbal products, most especially their presentation as supplements or herbal teas have given herbal products worldwide appeal. Synthetic molecules have yet to completely attenuate medical conditions including dementias, such as Alzheimer disease (AD), and Parkinson disease (PD), hence the need for the continuous screening of indigenous medicines to discover suitable drugs to alleviate disease symptoms.
The pathophysiology of AD is complex and insidious due to multifaceted mechanisms. In AD, acetylcholine (ACh) deficiency underlies memory and learning impairment, and this has led to the ‘cholinergic hypothesis’ of AD. ACh is stored in vesicles and released at nerve terminals after nerve cell depolarisation. ACh crosses the synaptic cleft where it binds to post-synaptic ACh receptors. The levels of synaptic ACh are regulated by acetylcholinesterase (AChE), hence this has led to the development of several classes of AChE inhibitors, such as donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine, as treatments to sustain ACh signaling and limit the cholinergic deficit in mild to moderate AD (2–8). The use of these drugs and memantine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, may limit disease severity, but the development of new drugs for AD has been limited.
Another defining postulate of AD pathogenesis and progression is the ‘amyloid-beta hypothesis’ which attributes the probable cause of AD to the distorted production, aggregation, and deposition of beta-amyloid peptide (Aβ) into neuritic plaques (8). In addition, the ‘tau hypothesis’ suggests that the formation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles that are composed of hyper-phosphorylated tau protein is also neurotoxic and contributory to AD pathogenesis and/or progression (9, 10). Consideration of these paradigms has highlighted the quest for disease-modifying drugs with broad activities, but few have preceded beyond phase 3 clinical trials due to a lack of efficacy and patient neurotoxicity (11).
AD neurotoxicity may also be exacerbated via the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as a consequence of both an accelerated generation of ROS and a gradual decline in cellular anti-oxidant defense mechanisms with senility. Hence mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidants have proven to be successful in counteracting Aβ toxicity in animal models, and in improving cognitive function and behavioral deficits in patients with mild to moderate AD (12, 13). Therefore, AD pathogenesis may involve potential interactions between Aβ, oxidative stress, and neurofibrillary tangles that collectively contribute to disease progression and complexity (8, 14, 15, 16). Other related emerging biochemical and metabolic pathways and targeted drug foci are also emerging (17, 18).
Today, most reports indicate that the etiology of AD, and many other neurodegenerative disorders, is based on multiple causal factors rather than a single etiopathological mechanism (19, 20). Underpinning the multifactorial nature of AD, a polypharmacy-based therapy with multipronged targets (21) might overcome some of the major limitations of currently available drugs, whose innovation has traditionally relied upon the one-molecule, one-target paradigm (22). Hence the use of drug entities that display multiple target specificity may be of improved therapeutic benefit than single-target drugs or combination therapy (22, 23). Indeed, recent drug trials have suggested that AD treatment using a poly-pharmacy product may better address the multiple etiopathology of AD (24).
Molecules with anti-cholinesterases and anti-oxidant capacity could likely provide suitable candidate drugs to modify AD pathology. However, direct synthetic anti-oxidants usage may be excluded due to potential adverse effects (25). Plant based medicines used as natural products are reported to possess beneficial synergistic activities when used as combinations (26). Polyherbal drugs have been widely used in adjuvant therapy in the management of chronic diseases (27, 28). Therefore, it becomes imperative to screen polyherbal products to ascertain claims of efficacy, safety and verify side effect profiles. Medicinal plant components are rich sources of secondary metabolites that act synergistically at multiple targets to provide important therapeutic effects.
Hence, three polyherbal formulations: Neocare Herbal Tea (NHT), Herbalin Complex Tea (HCT), and Phytoblis Herbal Tea (PHT) that have been suggested to combat memory impairment were screened for possible anti-cholinesterase, and anti-oxidant effects. The rationale for selection of these three polyherbal products also relies on the documented multiple pharmacological activities of the individual components of each of these herbal formulations. This is the first scientific report on the activities of these standardised polyherbal extracts in vitro.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Acetylthiocholine iodide (ATCI), L-ascorbic acid, bovine serum albumin (BSA), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 5,5,-dithiobis[2-nitrobenzoic acid] (DTNB), eserine, ferric chloride, Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, gallic acid, potassium ferricyanide, β-tocopherol, and trichloroacetic acid were all purchased from Sigma, UK. All other chemical and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade and were obtained from Sigma, UK unless stated otherwise.
Plants Herbal Samples and Extraction
A standardised herbal extract is an herb extract that has one or more components present in a specific guaranteed amount usually expressed as a percentage. The polyherbal standardised extracts used in this investigation were herbal extracts having two or more different plant materials in a specific guaranteed amount, expressed as percentages. The purpose behind the polyherbal standardisation is to assure to the consumer that the product retains the same chemical make-up and that this is consistent from batch to batch. This practice has developed out of the drug model in which reproducible amounts of different herbs are consistently used for every product dispensed. This differs from pharmacy practices in which scientists identify the components of a plant(s) that have definite pharmacological activity in the body and formulate the bioactive agent(s).
The standardised polyherbal extracts were obtained from a herbalist during a herbal exposition at the Herbfest conference held in October in Abuja, Nigeria in 2014. The crude powdered extract of NHT and PHT (100 g each) was immersed in 500 mL of methanol for 72 h. For the HCT, 80 g was immersed in 400 mL of methanol. In each case the mixture was shaken twice daily before filtration through a double layer gauze to obtain a supernatant that was then evaporated to dryness at 50 °C in vacuo. The dried methanolic extract yielded 4.22%, 5.53% and 5.24% of NHT, HCT and PHT, respectively (Table 3.1). The extracts were stored at 4 °C until required. Each extract was reconstituted with double distilled water before it was used in experimental assays. The phytocomposition per pack of each polyherbal formula is shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Name of standardised herbal products, components and yield of methanolic extract
S/No. | Name of Herbal Product | Constituents/ Common name | Family | Composition | Yield (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Neocare herbal tea (NHT) | Alchornea cordifolia (Christmas bush) | Euphorbiaceae | 25% | 4.22 |
Azadirachta indica (Neem leaves) | Meliaceae | 25% | |||
Pteridium aquilinum (Eagle Fern) | Dennstaedtiaceae | 50% | |||
2. | Herbalin complex (HCT) | Hippocratea volubilis (Hepocretea pollens) | Hippocrataeceae | 50% | 5.52 |
Viscum album (mistletoe) | Santalaceae | 25% | |||
Thymus pulegiodes (Mother thyme) | Lamiaceae | 25% | |||
3. | Phytoblis Herbal Tea (PHT) | Urtica dioica (Stinging nettles) | Urticaceae | 25% | 5.24 |
Hippocretea volubilis (Hepocretea pollens) | Hippocretaeceae | 50% | |||
Thymus vulgaris (Thyme) | Lamiaceae | 25% | |||
Aloe vera | Asphodelaceae | 25% |
Determination of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity Using a Microtiter Plate Assay
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was measured in a 96-well microtiter plate assay based on the method of Ellman et al. (29), as published previously (30). For each assay data point, 50 μL of 3 mM 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), 50 μL of AChE (1 mg/mL) (Sigma, C3389) or rat brain homogenate (prepared according to previous publications (31, 32)), 35 μL of 50 mM Tris/ HCl pH 8.0, and 40 μL of polyherbal extract were mixed and incubated at 37 °C. The assay was initiated by addition of 25 μL of 15 mM acetylthiocholineiodide (ATCI), with production of 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoate anion read at 412 nm every 30 sec for 10 min using a Spectramax microplate reader (ThermoFisher, UK). Assay reactions with polyherbal extracts were all performed in triplicate at concentrations of 200 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 2 μg/mL, 0.2 μg/mL and 0.02 μg/mL. A negative control assay performed in the absence of AChE provided a reagent blank. Eserine (Sigma, E8375) was used as a positive control to inhibit electric eel or rat brain AChE in a dose-dependent manner. The percentage inhibition of AChE by polyherbal extract was calculated relative to inhibition by eserine, with the herbal extract concentration producing 50% inhibition (IC50) of AChE calculated using GraphPad Prism (version 5.03, Inc., 2010, San Diego California USA) via non-linear regression analysis.
Assessment of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl Radical Scavenging Activity
A 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay was employed, to determine by a spectroscopic method, the anti-oxidant capability via free radical scavenging activity of polyherbal extracts using a method described previously (33). Stock solutions of each of the polyherbals (5 mg/mL) were diluted to final concentrations of 200 μg/mL, 100 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, 25 μg/ mL, 12.5 μg/mL, and 6.25 μg/mL in ethanol. One hundred and sixty microlitres of 0.1 mM DPPH in ethanol was added to 20 μL of extract or fraction, or Vitamin E (as a positive control), and the material was mixed with 20 μL of water. β-tocopherol was used as control and assayed over a concentration range of 1.56 mg/mL, 0.78 mg/mL, 0.39 mg/mL, 0.195 mg/mL and 0.0975 mg/mL. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 40 min in the dark, before reading the absorbance at 517 nm using a Spectramax microplate reader. Experimental blanks were performed in the absence of polyherbal extracts. The percentage anti-oxidant activity was estimated as the percent DPPH radical scavenging activity. All tests were performed in triplicate and inhibition percentages reported as means (± SD).
Assessment of Reducing Power Capacity
The reducing capacity of polyherbal methanolic extracts was evaluated via their ability to reduce ferric iron (Fe3+) to ferrous iron (Fe2+). Concentrations of polyherbal extracts were prepared across a concentration range of 6.25 μg/mL–50 μg/mL. Aliquots of 4 μL of 5 mg/mL of each plant sample were added to 400 μL of phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and 250 μL of 1% potassium ferricyanide and incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. Then 250 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added, and after vortexing, the sample was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. One hundred microlitres of the supernatant was removed and mixed with a similar volume of water and added to a microtiter plate. Twenty microlitres of freshly prepared ferric chloride solution was added, resulting in the formation of Perls’ Prussian blue, with absorbance read at 700 nm using a Spectramax plate reader (30, 33). A blank was prepared without addition of anti-oxidant. All assay points were conducted in triplicates. L-ascorbic acid was used as a positive control anti-oxidant compound. The percentage increase of reduction activity with increasing concentration of the extracts was assessed.
Determination of Total Phenolic and Total Flavonoid Content
Quantitation of total phenolics in polyherbal extracts utilised the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent (FCR) method as detailed in previous publications (30, 33). Twenty microlitres of polyherbal extracts with concentration range of 1 μg/mL–100 μg/mL, was mixed with 90 μL of double distilled water, quickly followed by the addition of 30 μL of FCR and the mixture shaken vigorously on a plate reader. Within 10 min, 60 μL of 10% Na2CO3 solution was added and the material incubated at 40 °C in a shaking incubator. After 40 min the absorbance of the mixture was read in a Spectramax plate reader at 760 nm. Gallic acid (Sigma, CAS14991-7) was similarly processed over a concentration range of 0.1 mg/mL–0.5 mg/mL as a positive control, and was used to generate a calibration curve for quantification of total phenolic content in polyherbal extracts across the concentration range of 0.01 mg/mL–0.05 mg/mL. Total phenolic content was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents/gram of plant extract (mg GAE/g).
Total flavonoid content of polyherbal extracts was determined similar to the method described by Zhishen et al. (34), as previously published (30), using quercetin as a reference compound. Twenty microlitres of polyherbal extract (5 mg/mL) in ethanol was mixed in a microplate well with 200 μL of 10% aluminum chloride solution and 1M potassium acetate solution. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature before measuring the absorbance at 415 nm using a Spectramax plate reader. The total flavonoids content of polyherbal extracts was quantified as mg quercetin equivalent per gram of polyherbal extract (mg QUER equivalent/g).
Cytotoxicity Assays
Cell culture
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells were cultured in Eagle’s minimal essential media (EMEM) with 2 mM Glutamine, 1% Non-Essential Amino Acids (NEAA), 10% Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS), and antibiotics (100 μg/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin). Cells were grown in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
Cytotoxicity assays
Cells were seeded at 3 × 104 cells per well in 96-well plates. At ~80%–90% confluence, polyherbal standardised extracts were added to wells at 1 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL, 100 μg/mL, and 1000 μg/mL. After 48 h, treatment media was removed, and cells incubated with fresh media containing 0.5% thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent (Sigma, M2128). After 4 h at 37 °C in the humidified incubator, the media was replaced with 100 μL of isopropanol and DMSO solution (1:1 (v/v)) and the absorbance read at 540 nm in a Spectramax plate reader. Each assay point was conducted in triplicate. The percentage of cells that were metabolically active was calculated for each concentration of polyherbal methanolic extract.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means (± SD). Normality was assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test which was conducted in SPSS. The concentration of agent producing 50% inhibition (IC50) was calculated using non-linear regression analysis with the GraphPad Prism (Version 5.03) for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com).
Results
Composition of Standardised Herbal Products and Yield of Methanolic Extracts
Polyherbal standardised products: Neocare herbal tea (NHT), Herbalin complex tea (HCT) and Phytoblis herbal tea (PHT) used for memory improvement in ethnomedicine of Eastern Nigeria have three or four herbs. Neocare herbal tea (NHT) contains standardised plants materials such as Alchornea cordifolia (Euphurbiaceae) leaves, Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae) and Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae); HCT contains Hippocratea volubilis (Hippocrateaceae), Viscum album (Santalaceae) and Thymus pulegiodes (Lamiaceae); PHT contain Urtica dioica (Urticaceae) stinging nettles, Hippocratea volubilis (Hippocrateaceae), Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae), and Aloe vera (Asphodelaceae). The composition and yield of each extract of these polyherbal products is presented in Table 1.
Polyherbal Extracts Exhibited Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity
The three polyherbal methanolic extracts exhibited significant (P = 0.001) concentration dependent AChE inhibitory activity (Figure 1). The polyherbal NHT extract had the highest AChE inhibition of 99.7% (IC50 = 324 μg/ mL); HCT demonstrated 73.8% (IC50 = 0.2 μg/ mL) and PHT gave 60.6% (IC50 = 0.7 μg/mL) inhibition while the pure drug, eserine, 100% inhibition (IC50 = 0.6 μg/mL) at 200 μg/mL. The order of percentage increase in inhibition of AChE was NHT > HCT > PHT; while the order of potency decreased according to HCT > PHT > NHT. The IC50 values are included in Table 2.
Figure 1.
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean percentage inhibition ± SD, n = 3
Table 2.
AChE inhibitory and DPPH radical scavenging activities of polyherbal extracts
S/No. | Polyherbal Methanolic Extracts / pure drugs | Inhibitory concentration (IC50) | |
---|---|---|---|
Anticholinesterases activity | Antioxidant activity | ||
1. | NHT | 324.0 ± 3.9 | 0.01 ± 0.023 |
2. | HCT | 0.20 ± 0.7 | 0.08 ± 0.0032 |
3. | PHT | 0.70 ± 2.9 | 0.30 ± 0.0020 |
4. | Eserine | 0.90 ± 0.03 | - |
5. | α-Tocopherol (vitamin E) | - | 20.0 ± 0.002 |
All values are reported as means ± SD (n = 3). Polyherbal extract inhibition of AChE was measured using a modified Ellman assay, with percentage inhibition of AChE calculated relative to eserine; polyherbal anti-oxidant activity was assessed via the percentage inhibition (radical scavenging) of DPPH with vitamin E used as a positive control.
Polyherbal Extracts Exhibited DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
The polyherbal methanolic extracts exhibited DPPH radical scavenging activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2). The percentage DPPH radical scavenging by each of the polyherbal extracts were HCT: 82.13% (IC50 = 0.08 μg/mL), NHT: 77.43% (IC50 = 0.01 μg/mL) and PHT: 76.28% (IC50 = 0.3 μg/mL) inhibition, respectively, at 1 mg/mL concentration. IC50 values have been included in Table 2.
Figure 2.
Antioxidant activity of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean percentage inhibition ± SD, n = 3
Polyherbal Methanolic Extracts Displayed Reducing (Anti-Oxidant) Activity
The polyherbal methanolic extracts demonstrated a concentration-dependent increase of anti-oxidant (reducing) capacity with increasing extract concentration (Figure 3). Reducing power of the different herbal extracts was not as effective as the standard drug, ascorbic acid. The reducing power of the polyherbal extracts was in the order: NHT > PHT > HCT at 50 μg/mL.
Figure 3.
Reducing capacity of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean percentage inhibition ± SD, n = 3
Total Phenolic Content and Total Flavonoid Content of Polyherbal Extracts
The total phenolic content (TPC) of the polyherbal extracts are shown in Figure 4A. The TPC of the extracts were calculated using the standard curve for Gallic acid (y = 0.006x + 0.147; R2 = 0.996). The order of TPC in the polyherbal extracts revealed that PHT > HCT > NHT. The results of aluminum chloride colorimetric determination of total flavonoid contents (TFC) are shown in Figure 4B. TFC values were estimated using the standard curve for quercetin (y = 0.0244x + 0.161; R2 = 0.974). The results showed that the TFC content was in the order PHT > NHT > HCT and was dose dependent (P < 0.0001).
Figure 4.
Total phenolic content (A), and total flavonoid content (B) of polyherbal extracts. Values presented as mean ± SD, n = 3
Polyherbal Extracts are Tolerated by Liver Cells at High Doses
Polyherbal standardised extracts were evaluated for cytotoxicity to human liver HepG2 cells. Cytotoxicity was observed to be concentration-dependent but with significant loss of metabolic activity only at the highest dose employed for all extracts (1000 μg/mL). HepG2 cell metabolic activity at 1000 μg/mL was ~43%, 66%, and 71% for NHT, HCT and PHT, respectively. Cytotoxicity effects of the polyherbal extracts were minimal at lower doses. The IC50 viability values for the polyherbal extract were in the order: PHT > HCT > NHT. The cytotoxicity profile of these three standardised herbal extracts was negligible and approximately equipotent at 10 μg/mL. Some extracts, however, moderately increased the metabolic activity of the cells at certain concentrations (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effect of standardised polyherbal methanolic extracts on HepG2 cells viability
S/No. | Polyherbal Extracts | 1 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | 1000 μg/ mL | IC50 (μg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | NHT | 111.3±3.5a | 107.5±9.2 | 70.1±6.3b | 43.2±5.22c | ~745 |
2. | HCT | 105±5 | 103.5±7.25 | 91.6±6.4 | 65.65±9.34c | ~1400 |
3. | PHT | 104.7±7.5 | 102.4±3.4 | 95.4±6.36a | 71.2±5.3c | >1650 |
HepG2 cells were incubated with polyherbal extracts at the specified concentration for 48 h and the percentage of viable cells evaluated using a MTT assay. Polyherbal extracts were assessed at least in triplicate across a 1 μg/mL–1000 μg/mL concentration range, and an approximate IC50 calculated.
All values are reported as means (±SD) (n = 3)
P = 0.043,
P = 0.006,
P = 0.0001.
Discussion
Neurodegenerative diseases may be exacerbated by the generation of free radicals and associated cellular redox stress, a process that could be effectively and efficiently ameliorated by herbal products that possess anti-oxidant activity. Ethnomedicine has utilised polyherbal formulations purported to have multiple health benefits (28). Indeed, standardised extracts may have wide acceptance since they can produce reproducible therapeutic effects comparable to crude extracts (28). Clinical effectiveness requires delivery of an active dosage and the use of standardised extracts is an innovative way to assure the delivery of an effective dosage (35).
Several reports have evaluated the phytocomponents of PHT, HCT and NHT, however, prior to this study no data exists on the anti-cholinesterase activity or anti-oxidant effects of these polyherbal combinations. The effect of polyherbal extracts on one of the primary defects in AD; that of a deficit in acetylcholine signaling, was indirectly assessed via their ability to inhibit AChE. The screening investigation confirmed that all three polyherbal products exhibited significant, and dose-dependent inhibition of AChE. AChE inhibitory activity was highest (99.7%) with the NHT extract, however this also had the lowest potency (IC50 = 324 μg/mL). The other two extracts HCT and PHT displayed AChE inhibition of 61%– 74%, and both with considerable potency (IC50 between 0.2 μg/mL–0.7 μg/mL), comparable and indeed slightly lower than the pure drug eserine at 0.9 μg/mL.
The NHT formulation contains Alchornea cordifolia (Euphorbiaceae), Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae) and Pteridium acquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae) in the ratio of 1:1:2 with a 4.22% yield upon 50% methanolic extraction. Of these three plants, it is only the aqueous bark extracts of Azadiracta indica that have been reported previously to have AChE inhibitory activity (36). Furthermore, Azadiracta indica has been reported to be effective in an experimental model of AD by virtue of its cognition enhancement, anti-depressant and anti-anxiety properties (37). Although not reported for Alchornea cordifolia, another member of the Eurphorbiaceae family, Jatropha gossypifolia L has been reported to exhibit AChE inhibitory activity (38). The role of Pteridium acquilinum on memory enhancement is as yet unknown, and may also contribute to the anti-AChE activity we detected for the polyherbal product, but we have yet to investigate this further.
The phytoconstituents of HCT includes Hippocratea volubilis (Hippocreateaceae), Viscum album (Santalaceae), and Thymus pulegiodes (Lamiacene) in the ratio of 2:1:1. A new triterpene caffeoyl ester, lupeol caffeate was obtained from Hippocratea volubilis (39) with reported benefits to a broad range of diseases (40). Viscum album is reported to exhibit sedative, anti-epileptic and anti-psychotic activity in mice (41), anti-oxidant capacity (4), as well as anti-amyloid β and anti-dementia effects, and therefore may have a therapeutic role in the prevention of the progression of AD (42). Thymus pulegiodes is a rich source of natural anti-oxidants and AChE inhibitors, which may be useful in preventing and treating AD and other neurodegenerative disorders (43).
PHT contains Urtica dioica, Hippocratea volubilis, and Thymus vulgaris in the ratio of 1:2:1. Luteolin, a flavonoid has been isolated from Thymus vulgaris and is known to possess anti-amyloid activity (44, 45). Urtica dioica has been reported to possess anti-oxidant and anti-microbial activities (46).
An assessment of the anti-oxidant activity via DPPH free radical scavenging and ferric iron reducing capacity demonstrated that NHT was the most active polyherbal agent. Anti-inflammatory (47, 48, 49) and anti-oxidant (50) effects of agents from NHT (Alchornea cordifolia) have also been reported. Likewise Alchornea cordifolia alone also has a relatively high total phenolic content with useful free radical scavenging activity reported (51).
Conclusion
The phytocomponents of these polyherbal products possess significant anti-cholinesterase, and anti-oxidant activities (refer to graphical abstract). These inherent pharmacological properties are useful to address multiple elements of the etiopathology of AD, and therefore lay credence to the potential use of ethnomedicine by herbalists for memory enhancing activity. These polyherbal extracts remain a potentially beneficial pharmacotherapy for the management of diseases with cholinergic deficits, such as AD, PD, and myasthenia gravis.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the technical support of Mr Obi Cosmas, the technologist attached to the Pharmacology department and Mr GS Uwakwe of Pharmacognosy Department, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island Bayelsa State, Nigeria that assisted with the preparation of the extract.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interest associated with the production or publication of this work.
Funds
This work was in part funded by International Travelling Fellowship awards to Dr Lucky Nwidu and Dr Ekramy Elmorsy by the University of Nottingham, UK. Dr Wayne Carter was supported by the University of Nottingham, UK.
Authors’ Contributions
Conception and design: EE, LLN
Analysis and interpretation of the data: WGC, EE
Drafting of the article: WGC, LLN
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: WGC
Final approval of the article: WGC
Statistical expertise: EE
Obtaining of funding: LLN
Administrative, technical or logistic support: LLN
Collection and assembly of data: EE
References
- 1.Brahmachari UN. The role of science in recent progress of medicine. Curr Sci. 2001;81(1):15–16. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lopez OL. The growing burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Amer J Manag Care. 2011;17:S339–S345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Houghton PJ, Ren Y, Howes MJ. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants and fungi. Nat Prod Rep. 2006;23(2):181–199. doi: 10.1039/b508966m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orhan I, Sener B, Choudhary MI, Khalid A. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of some Turkish medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;91(1):57–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2003.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johannsson M, Snaedal J, Johannesson GH, Gudmundsson TE, Johnsen K. The acetylcholine index: an electroencephalographic marker of cholinergic activity in the living human brain applied to Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;39(3–4):132–142. doi: 10.1159/000367889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martorana A, Esposito Z, Koch G. Beyond the cholinergic hypothesis: do current drugs work in Alzheimer’s disease? CNS Neurosci Ther. 2010;16(4):235–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stone JG, Casadesus G, Gustaw-Rothenberg K, Siedlak SL, Wang X, Zhu X, et al. Frontiers in Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2011;2(1):9–23. doi: 10.1177/2040622310382817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Karran E, Mercken M, De Strooper B. The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(9):698–712. doi: 10.1038/nrd3505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang JZ, Xia YY, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K. Abnormal hyperphosphorylation of tau: sites, regulation, and molecular mechanism of neurofibrillary degeneration. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2013;33:S123–S139. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-129031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martin L, Latypova X, Terro F. Post-translational modifications of tau protein: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2010;58(4):458–471. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghezzi L, Scarpini E, Galimberti D. Disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2013;7:1471–1478. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S41431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Palacios HH, Yendluri BB, Parvathaneni K, Shadlinski VB, Obrenovich ME, Leszek J, et al. Mitochondrion specific antioxidants as drug treatments for Alzheimer disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2011;10(2):149–162. doi: 10.2174/187152711794480474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Manczak M, Mao P, Calkins MJ, Cornea A, Reddy AP, Murphy MP, et al. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants protect against amyloid-beta toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease neurons. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(Suppl 2):S609–S631. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parihar MS, Hemnani T. Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions. J Clin Neurosci. 2004;11(5):456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ballard C, Gauthier S, Corbett A, Brayne C, Aarsland D, Jones E. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1019–1031. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61349-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mann DMA, Hardy J. Amyloid or tau: the chicken or the egg? Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(4):609–613. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1162-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sontag JM, Sontag E. Protein phosphatase 2A dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7:16. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.del Ser T, Steinwachs KC, Gertz HJ, Andres MV, Gomez-Carrillo B, Medina M, et al. Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with the GSK-3 inhibitor tideglusib: a pilot study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2013;33(1):205–215. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Craig LA, Hong NS, McDonald RJ. Revisiting the cholinergic hypothesis in the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(6):1397–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Teich AF, Arancio O. Is the amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease therapeutically relevant? Biochem J. 2012;446(2):165–177. doi: 10.1042/BJ20120653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bolognesi ML, Simoni E, Rosini M, Minarini A, Tumiatti V, Melchiorre C. Multitarget-directed ligands: innovative chemical probes and therapeutic tools against Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11(22):2797–2806. doi: 10.2174/156802611798184373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang HY. One-compound-multiple-targets strategy to combat Alzheimer’s disease. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(24):5260–5264. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Capurro V, Busquet P, Lopes JP, Bertorelli R, Tarozzo G, Bolognesi ML, et al. Pharmacological characterization of memoquin, a multi-target compound for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. PloS One. 2013;8(2):e56870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alvarez XA, Cacabelos R, Sampedro C, Couceiro V, Aleixandre M, Vargas M, et al. Combination treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: results of a randomized, controlled trial with cerebrolysin and donepezil. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011;8(5):583–591. doi: 10.2174/156720511796391863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Radulović N, Stankov-Jovanović V, Stojanović G, Šmelcerović A, Spiteller M, Asakawa Y. Screening of in vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of nine Hypericum species from the Balkans. Food Chem. 2007;103(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang WJ, Li DP, Li JK, Li MH, Chen YL, Zhang PZ. Synergistic antioxidant activities of eight traditional Chinese herb pairs. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32(6):1021–1026. doi: 10.1248/bpb.32.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Szentmihalyi K, Gere A, Szollosi-Varga I, Blazovics A, Jasztrab S, Lado K, et al. Inhibition of lipid peroxidation of herbal extracts (obtained from plant drug mixtures of Myrtilli folium, Phaseoli fructus sine seminibus and Salviae folium) used in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Biol Hung. 2010;61(1):45–51. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.61.2010.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kesavanarayanan KS, Kavimani S, Prathiba D. In vitro antioxidant activity of the individual herbs of DIA-2, a herbal mixture containing standardized extracts of Allium sativum and Lagerstroemia speciosa. J App Pharm Sci. 2015;5(02):22–27. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2015.50205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Featherstone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of actetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961;7:88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nwidu LL, Elmorsy E, Thornton J, Wijamunige B, Wijesekara A, Tarbox R, et al. Anti-acetylcholinesterase activity and antioxidant properties of extracts and fractions of Carpolobia lutea. Pharma Biol. 2017;55(1):1875–1883. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1339283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carter WG, Tarhoni M, Rathbone AJ, Ray DE. Differential protein adduction by seven organophosphorus pesticides in both brain and thymus. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007;26(4):347–353. doi: 10.1177/0960327107074617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tarhoni MH, Vigneswara V, Smith M, Anderson S, Wigmore P, Lees JE, et al. Detection, quantification, and microlocalisation of targets of pesticides using microchannel plate autoradiographic imagers. Molecules. 2011;16(10):8535–8551. doi: 10.3390/molecules16108535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nwidu LL, Nwafor PA, Vilegas W. Antiulcer effects of ethyl acetate fraction of Carpolobia lutea leaf. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2012;2(8):233–242. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2012.2841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999;64(4):555–559. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Firenzuoli F, Gori L. Herbal medicine today: clinical and research issues. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2007;4(Suppl 1):37–40. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vinutha B, Prashanth D, Salma K, Sreeja SL, Pratiti D, Padmaja R, et al. Screening of selected Indian medicinal plants for acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;109(2):359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raghavendra M, Maiti R, Kumar S, Acharya SB. Role of aqueous extract of Azadirachta indica leaves in an experimental model of Alzheimer’s disease in rats. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2013;3(1):37–47. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.112239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Feitosa CM, Freitas RM, Luz NNN, Bezerra MZB, Trevisan MTS. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by somes promising Brazilian medicinal plants. Braz J Biol. 2011;71(3):783–789. doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842011000400025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Alvarenga N, Ferro EA. A new lupane caffeoyl ester from Hippocratea volubilis. Fitoterapia. 2000;71(6):719–721. doi: 10.1016/S0367-326X(00)00217-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Siddique HR, Salem M. Beneficial health effects of lupeol triterpene: a review of preclinical studies. Life Sci. 2011;88(7–8):285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gupta G, Kazimi I, Afzal M, Rahman M, Saleem S, Ashraf MS, et al. Sedative, antiepileptic and antipsychotic effects of Viscum album L. (Loranthaceae) in mice and rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141(3):810–816. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jang JY, Kim S, Song K, Seong YH. Korean Mistletoe (Viscum album var. coloratum) inhibits Amyloid β Protein (25-35)-induced cultured neuronal cell damage and memory impairment. Nat Prod Sci. 2015;21(2):134–140. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kindl M, Blazekovic B, Bucar F, Vladimir-Knezevic S. Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of six thymus species. Evid-Based Compl Altern Med. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/403950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.López-Lázaro M. Distribution and biological activities of the flavonoid luteolin. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2009;9(1):31–59. doi: 10.2174/138955709787001712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rezai-Zadeh K, Shytle RD, Bai Y, Tian J, Hou H, Mori T, et al. Flavonoid-mediated presenilin-1 phosphorylation reduces Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid production. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(3):574–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00344.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kukric ZZ, Topalic-Trivunovic LN, Kukavica BM, Matoš SB, Pavičic SS, Boroja MM, et al. Characterization of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of nettle leaves (Urtica dioica L.) Acta Periodica Technologica. 2012;43:257–272. doi: 10.2298/APT1243257K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Manga MH, Brkic D, Marie DE, Quetin-Leclercq J. In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of Alchornea cordifolia (Schmach. & Thonn) Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;92(2–3):209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Osadebe PO, Okoye FB. Anti-inflammatory effects of crude methanolic extract and fractions of Alchornea cordifolia leaves. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;89(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00195-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mavar-Manga H, Haddad M, Pieters L, Baccelli C, Penge A, Quetin-Leclercq J. Anti-inflammatory compounds from leaves and root bark of Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. & Thonn.) Müll. Arg. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;115(1):25–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nia R, Paper DH, Franz G, Essien EE. Anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant potential of an African Recipe: Alchornea cordifolia seeds. Acta Hortic. 2005;678:91–96. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.678.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kouakou-Siransy G, Sahpaz S, Nquessan GI, Datte JY, Brou JK, Gressier B, et al. Effects of Alchornea cordifolia on elastase and superoxide anion produced by human neutrophils. Pharm Biol. 2010;48(2):128–133. doi: 10.3109/13880200903051609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]