Abstract
Photoswitchable neurotransmitter receptors are powerful tools for precise manipulation of neural signaling. Through the trans-cis isomerization of azobenzene photoswitches tethered to these receptors, their activities can be rapidly and reversibly controlled by light. However, their applications for slow or long-lasting biological events are constrained by thermal relaxation of cis-azobenzene, a process that renders the receptor state unsustainable in darkness after the light stimulus. We here present a simple approach to slow down this process and thereby enhance the bi-stability (i.e. the ability to stably reside in either of the two states) of photoswitchable receptors. Introducing methyl groups to the ortho positions of azobenzene strongly retards photoswitch thermal relaxation both in solution and on cell surface. In cultured cells and intact brain tissue, modifying inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors with one of the derivatives, dMPC1, allows bi-directional receptor control with 380-nm and 500-nm light. Benefited by the bi-stability of dMPC1, the modified receptors can be locked in either an active or an inactive state in darkness after a brief pulse of light. This strategy thus enables both rapid and sustained manipulation of neurotransmission, allowing optogenetic interrogation of neural functions over a broad range of time scales.
Graphical Abstract
Authors are required to submit a graphic entry for the Table of Contents (TOC) that, in conjunction with the manuscript title, should give the reader a representative idea of one of the following: A key structure, reaction, equation, concept, or theorem, etc., that is discussed in the manuscript. Consult the journal’s Instructions for Authors for TOC graphic specifications.

Unlocking biological mechanisms requires an understanding of molecular and cellular events in space and time. Optogenetic methodologies combines the advantages of optical and genetic control to enable targeted perturbation of events with superb spatial and temporal resolution.1–3 In the nervous system, events can occur within milliseconds (e.g. an action potential), or occur over hours or longer (e.g. synaptic plasticity encoding memories). For manipulating slow or long-lasting events, it would be useful to have “bi-stable” optogenetic tools that can be switched persistently between on and off states with a brief flash of light. Bi-stability would remove requirement for continuous irradiation, which may be impractical, invasive, or phototoxic.
The nervous system employs myriad neurotransmitter receptors to mediate fast signaling and slow neuromodulation. To decipher their distinct roles, receptors for glutamate, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), acetylcholine, and ATP have been reengineered to allow optogenetic manipulation.2,4 Photo-control is achieved via the trans-cis isomerization of azobenzene-based photoswitchable tethered ligands (PTLs). Most PTLs exhibit short half-lives in their metastable state (<0.5 h).5–7, allowing only transient control over their conjugate receptors.
Here we present a simple strategy to enhance the thermal stability of a PTL, thereby improving the bi-stability of the receptor it controls (Figure 1). We strategically introduce steric hindrance nearby the diazo bond of azobenzene to retard thermal isomerization of the metastable cis-isomer (Figures 1b and 1c). We validate this approach with GABA receptors (GABAARs), the key mediators of fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain.8 GABAARs are ligand-gated chloride channels assembled from 19 possible subunits, with a common stoichiometry of two α, two β, and one tertiary subunit (mostly γ or δ; Figure 1a). We previously engineered a series of light-regulated GABAA receptors (LiGABARs), allowing optogenetic control of six different α-isoforms.9 Photo-control of α1-GABAA receptors, the most abundant subtype, has been validated in vitro and in vivo in the cerebral cortex of awake, behaving mice, demonstrating LiGABAR in neurobiology.9
Figure 1.

Rapid versus sustained manipulation of an inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor through a photoswitchable tethered ligand (PTL). (a) Schematic illustration of the lightregulated GABAA receptor (LiGABAR) studied in this work. The GABA-binding pocket (located at the interface of α and β subunit) is indicated by a dashed curve. Isomerization of the PTL prevents or allows GABA binding, thereby halting or triggering chloride influx through the transmembrane channel. In an ideal scenario, the state of a LiGABAR can either be rapidly switched by two different wavelengths of light or persist in darkness after the termination of light stimulus. (b) Photoisomerization and thermal relaxation processes of PAG1C, the parent PTL for α1-LiGABAR. (c) The di-o-dimethylated derivatives of PAG1C tested in this work.
The α1-LiGABAR was engineered by covalently conjugating a PTL (PAG1C; Figure 1b) near the receptor’s GABA-binding pocket (Figure 1a). Like many other PTLs, PAG1C comprises a sulfhydryl-reactive maleimide group, a photoswitchable azobenzene core, and a ligand for the receptor. Its azobenzene core isomerizes between cis (twisted) and trans (extended) states upon irradiation of 380-nm and 500-nm light, respectively. In the dark, the metastable cis-isomer gradually relaxes back to the thermally stable trans state. Once tethered to a genetically introduced cysteine (α1T125C), PAG1C delivers its antagonist ligand into the GABA-binding pocket when the azobenzene is in the trans but not the cis configuration. Hence the receptor can be rapidly and reversibly switched between functional (conducting) and antagonized (non-conducting) states with UV and green light, respectively. While the α1-LiGABAR enabled strong photo-control of inhibitory responses in neurons, we observed limited bi-stability of this receptor, as noticeable “re-antagonism” occurred within ~5 min of post-UV dark period.9 This issue was attributed to the thermal relaxation of cis-PAG1C.
We sought to enhance the bi-stability of LiGABAR with minimal alterations in the construction and photochemical properties of the PTL. This may be achieved by modifying the positions on azobenzene that are not involved in module assembly. Previous studies showed that azobenzene derivatives carrying two or more ortho-substituents exhibit higher thermal stability in the cis state, compared to the unmodified version.10–12 The choice of substituent can be as small as a methyl group, and if only two ortho-substituents are introduced, they should be placed on the same side of azobenzene in order to slow down thermal relaxation.10,11 This “ortho-effect” is likely due to steric hindrance between the ortho-substituents and the lone pair electrons of nitrogen atoms, causing retardation in the cis-to-trans conversion.10
Intrigued by its simplicity, we applied this chemical strategy to enhance the bi-stability of α1-LiGABAR. Because PAG1C is tethered nearby the GABA-binding pocket, introducing additional groups to azobenzene might cause unfavorable interactions between the PTL and the receptive site. To minimize adverse effects on photo-control, we added only two methyl groups to PAG1C (Figure 1c), either at 2’,6’-positions (dMPC1; close to the ligand) or at 2,6-positions (dMPC2; close to maleimide). Methyl group was chosen for its small size and minor impacts on the spectroscopic properties of azobenzene. The three PTLs were synthesized by sequential coupling of a glycine unit and 3-maleimidopropionic acid to 4,4’-diamino azobenzene (unsubstituted or 2,6-dimethylated), followed by guanidinylation of the glycine amino group (SI Schemes 1 and 2).
We first validated this strategy by comparing the thermal stability of cis-PTLs in solution. UV-VIS absorption spectra for trans- and cis-PTLs (250 μM in DMSO) were measured after illuminating the samples with 500-nm and 380-nm light, respectively. To measure thermal relaxation, the UV-irradiated samples were stored in darkness, and their spectral changes were monitored over time. As exemplified by PAG1C, the characteristic π-π* band of trans azobenzene shifted significantly after UV irradiation, resulting in a large absorbance difference at 376 nm between the two isomers (Figure 2a). During post-UV dark period, the absorbance at 376 nm gradually increased over time, indicating that cis-PAG1C underwent thermal relaxation to the trans isomer.
Figure 2.

Thermal relaxation is retarded by di-o-methylation of azobenzene. (a-c) Thermal relaxation of cis-PTLs in DMSO. Absorption spectra for each PTL (250 μM) were measured at room temperature from samples illuminated with 500 nm (green; trans-dominant), illuminated with 380 nm (violet; cis-dominant), and in darkness (grey; post-380 nm). (d) Time course of thermal relaxation derived from panels a-c. Fraction of cis-PTL is calculated as (A500 – Adark)/(A500 – A380) at 376, 370, and 370 nm for PAG1C, dMPC1, and dMPC2, respectively.
The di-o-methylated PTLs exhibited a similar spectral separation for the two isomers, providing the maximal absorbance difference at 370 nm (Figures 2b and 2c). Distinct from PAG1C, however, the progression of thermal relaxation was much slower for these derivatives (Figures 2b–2d). Compared to a ~90% conversion of cis-PAG1C over 22 h, relaxation of cis-dMPC1 and cis-dMPC2 was <10% over the same period (Figure 2d). To estimate thermal stability under a physiologically relevant condition, we monitored the relaxation of cis-PTLs (as adducts of glutathione; SI Figure 1) in saline. The half-life of cis-PAG1C, cis-dMPC1, and cis-dMPC2 are 16 min, 11 h, and 12 h at room temperature and 10 min, 6.2 h, and 7.6 h at 37 °C. Accordingly, di-o-methylation of azobenzene enhanced the thermal stability of a cis-PTL at least 40-fold relative to the unmodified prototype.
We next assessed the performance of dMPC1 and dMPC2 in photo-controlling α1-GABAA receptors. The parent PTL (PAG1C), when installed onto the receptor, is functionally inert in the cis state but strongly antagonizes the receptor in the trans state. Hence receptor antagonism is rapidly triggered by green light and relieved by UV light. To test whether dMPC1 and dMPC2 preserve this functional profile, we examined the photosensitivity of GABA-elicited currents from dMPC-conjugated receptors. We expressed the mutant receptors (α1T125C together with the wild-type β2 and γ2 subunits) in HEK cells and treated them with PAG1C, dMPC1 or dMPC2 to generate the LiGABAR variants. GABA-elicited currents were acquired by whole-cell voltage-clamp recording, during which cells were held at −70 mV and alternately illuminated with 500 nm and 380 nm (Figure 3a).
Figure 3.

Di-o-methylation allows the PTL to rapidly control LiGABAR activity with light (a) while exerting sustained receptor modulation in darkness (b). (a) Representative recording traces from HEK cells showing fast and reversible manipulation of receptor activity by PAG1C, dMPC1, and dMPC2. (b) Representative traces showing enhanced bi-stability of LiGABAR when the receptor is modified by dMPC1. The grey arrow indicates the fraction of current lost at the end of the dark period. (c) Time-dependent changes in photoswitchable current amplitude (It – I500; t = time in darkness) since the initial 380-nm illumination. (d) Quantification of thermal relaxation over 30 minutes. Currents were elicited by 3 and 10 μM GABA for (a) and (b), respectively, and were acquired via voltage-clamp recording (held at −70 mV). Data in (c) and (d) are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 4 cells for PAG1C and 6 cells for dMPC1).
As illustrated by PAG1C, light switching caused fast and reversible changes in the current amplitude, with 380-nm light amplifying and 500-nm light reducing the response (Figure 3a). The photoswitching effect was quantified as the percent current reduction caused by green light (compared to the current peak in UV). At 3 μM GABA, PAG1C exerted 77 ± 3% photoswitching of the response (n = 5 cells). Analogously, both dMPC1 and dMPC2 enabled fast and reversible photo-control of GABAA-receptor activity (Figure 3a). Photoswitching by dMPC1 (67 ± 3%, n = 5 cells) was stronger than that by dMPC2 (56 ± 6%, n = 6 cells). Because these two compounds show similar photochemical profiles in solution (Figure 2), the weaker photoswitching by dMPC2 indicates that substituting at 2,6-(but not 2’,6’-) positions might cause steric interference which disfavors ligand binding.
We next tested whether the bi-stability of LiGABAR is improved by di-o-methylation of the PTL. We compared PAG1C with dMPC1, the derivative that exerts a similar degree of photo-control. HEK cells expressing PTL-conjugated receptors were held at −70 mV, and currents were elicited by 10 μM GABA every 3 min. In each experiment, a pair of responses, one under 500-nm and the other under 380-nm illumination, was first recorded to measure the size of “photoswitchable current.” The experiment then proceeded in darkness for 30 min and ended with a response elicited under 380-nm light (Figure 3b). In PAG1C-treated cells, current amplitude gradually decreased over the 30-min dark period. This current reduction was caused by thermal relaxation of cis-PAG1C rather than other changes in the receptor or the cell, as the subsequent UV flash completely restored the current back to its initial level. We plotted the progression of PTL thermal relaxation as the time-dependent reduction in the fraction of “photoswitchable current” (Figure 3c). Fitting this plot with a single-exponential decay yielded the half-life of cis-PAG1C in the context of LiGABAR (t1/2 = 34 ± 2 min at room temperature; n = 4 cells).
In contrast, current amplitude reduced very slowly in dMPC1-treated cells (Figures 3b and 3c). Because the current decline was too slow, we were unable to estimate the half-life for cis-dMPC1. Instead, we compared dMPC1 with PAG1C using the percent of photoswitchable current lost at the end of 30-min dark period (Figure 3d). When receptors were equipped with dMPC1, current loss was only 10 ± 2% (n = 6 cells), far less than the 46 ± 3% loss when receptors were installed PAG1C (n = 4 cells). Thus after relieving antagonism by the initial UV pulse, dMPC1-conjugated receptors were virtually locked in the fully functional state. Together with the fact that antagonism is mediated by the thermally stable trans isomer, implanting dMPC1 makes LiGABAR a highly bi-stable and fast-acting optogenetic device.
Finally, we validated the use of dMPC1 in neural circuitry from the brain. We used the bi-stability of dMPC1 to gain new insights into the dynamics of membrane turnover of GABAA receptors at inhibitory synapses, where the α1-isoform is enriched8,13. Brain slices from mice that had been virally transduced with α1(T125C) were treated with PAG1C or dMPC1. Electrical stimulation of presynaptic neurons in the slice elicits GABA release, which result in inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) that we measured by voltage-clamping a postsynaptic neuron to 0 mV. Excitatory synapses were blocked by adding pharmacological blockers of glutamate receptors.
Like the parent PTL (PAG1C), treatment with dMPC1 conferred light-sensitivity, with IPSC amplitude increasing dramatically upon exposure to 380 nm light, as receptor antagonism is relieved, and decreasing in 500 nm light, when antagonism is reinstated (decrease of 57 ± 6% for PAG1C and 51 ± 2% for dMPC1; n = 4 and 5 cells; Figures 4b). However unlike the parent PTL, relief of dMPC1 antagonism by 380 nm persisted long after light offset (Figure 4b). At 30 min after the light, dMPC1–treated neurons exhibited only a 9 ± 6% decline in the photoswitchable IPSC component (n = 5 cells), compared to a 71 ± 4% decline in PAG1C–treated neurons (n = 4 cells).
Figure 4.

(a, b) dMPC1 enables robust photo-control and sustained manipulation of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IP-SCs). (a) Schematic illustration for the measurement of IPSCs. (b) Representative recording traces showing enhanced bi-stability of LiGABAR when dMPC1 was used as the PTL. (c, d) dMPC1 enables optogenetic interrogation of activity-dependent receptor turnover in brain slices. (c) Schematic illustration of the experiments. See SI Figure 3 for details. (d) IPSC photosensitivity was significantly lost when LiGABARs were antagonized (i.e. causing less neuronal inhibition) during the 12-hour period and more retained when LiGABARs were relieved from antagonism, suggesting that enhancing neuronal activity accelerates the turnover of synaptic GABAA receptors. Wholecell recordings were carried out in cortical neurons at 33 ± 2°C (a, b) and hippocampal neurons at room temperature (c, d), with cells held at 0 mV.
Inhibitory synapses are dynamically regulated, and insertion or removal of GABAA receptors may be important for synaptic plasticity.15 To gain insight into the regulation of GABAA receptor turnover, we exploited the enhanced bi-stability of dMPC1 and measured the degree of photosensitivity remaining at inhibitory synapses hours after treatment with dMPC1.
GABAA receptors conjugated to dMPC1 are antagonized in darkness, therefore inhibition caused by ambient GABA should be suppressed. In contrast, UV light should relieve antagonism, unveiling inhibition. By suppressing or unveiling the effects of inhibition, we can reveal whether neuronal activity affects the rate of GABAA receptor turnover. Because of the enhanced bi-stability of dMPC1, nearly complete relief from antagonism can be achieved for hours with minimal exposure to UV light, which can be damaging.
Slices kept in darkness showed almost no loss of IPSC photosensitivity over 12 hours, consistent with retention of PTL-conjugated receptors at the synapse. However, slices that received only a few brief flashes of 390-nm light (15 sec, every 3 h) showed a significant decrease in IPSC photosensitivity (55 ± 6% loss, p = 0.0021, n = 5 cells; SI Figure 3), indicating loss of PTL-conjugated receptors. This finding suggests that turnover of synaptic GABAA receptors is activity-dependent, a homeostatic mechanism of potential importance for synaptic development and plasticity.
In summary, we have designed bi-stable PTLs for optogenetic control of receptors. We exploited steric hindrance of ortho substituents of azobenzene (the “ortho effect”), to slow the cis-to-trans thermal isomerization, thereby stabilizing the cis state. This strategy should apply to other PTL-regulated neurotransmitter receptors4 or voltage-gated ion channels14. By allowing transient light flashes to yield persistent effects, bi-stabile switches minimize photodamage and enable multiplexing with other optical techniques in neurobiology, such as fluorescent Ca2+ imaging. Bistable photoswitches like dMPC1 are ideal for perturbing slow biological processes, including neuronal development and long-term plasticity.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by funding from the National Institute of Health (R01 NS100911 and U01 NS090527 to R.H.K.).
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Supplemental figures, schemes, details of chemical synthesis and electrophysiological experiments, and additional information about the photoswitch compounds (PDF).
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
- (1).Miesenböck G Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2011, 27, 30.1–30.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Kramer RH; Mourot A; Adesnik H Nat. Neurosci 2013, 16, 816–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Zhang K; Cui B Trends Biotech 2015, 33, 92–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Kienzler MA; Isacoff EY Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 2017, 45, 202–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Gorostiza P; Volgraf M; Numano R; Szobota S; Trauner D; Isacoff EY Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10865–10870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Tochitsky I; Banghart MR; Mourot A; Yao JZ; Gaub B; Kramer RH; Trauner D Nat. Chem 2012, 4, 105–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Lin W-C; Davenport CM; Mourot A; Vytla D; Smith CM; Medeiros KA; Chambers JJ; Kramer RH ACS Chem. Biol 2014, 9, 1414–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Farrant M; Nusser Z Nat. Rev. Neurosci 2005, 6, 215–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Lin W-C; Tsai M-C; Davenport CM; Smith CM; Veit J; Wilson NM; Adesnik H; Kramer RH Neuron 2015, 88, 879–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Nishioka H; Liang X; Asanuma H Chem. Eur. J 2010, 16, 2054–2062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Nishimura N; Sueyoshi T; Yamanaka H; Imai E; Yamamoto S; Hasegawa S Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 1976, 49, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Beharry AA; Sadovski O; Woolley GA J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 19684–19687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Brünig I; Scotti E; Sidler C; Fritschy JM J. Comp. Neurol 2002, 443, 43–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Fortin DL; Dunn TW; Fedorchak A; Allen D; Montpetit R; Banghart MR; Trauner D; Adelman JP; Kramer RH J. Neurophysiol 2011, 106, 488–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Mele M; Leal G; Duarte CB Role of GABAAR trafficking in the plasticity of inhibitory synapses. J. Neurochem 2016, 139, 997–1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
