Abstract
The low intelligence quotient (IQ) level is one of the most common and important medical, social, and familial problems in all countries. The current study aimed to estimate mean IQ with the Wechsler scale in Iran by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. In the current meta-analysis, all articles related to IQ conducted in Iran using the Wechsler scale were deeply searched by reviewing citation databases including Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Springer, SID, Magiran, Iranmedex, Medlib, and Google Scholar motor search and using valid keywords without time limits. Due to heterogeneity between studies, a random effects model was used to combine the results of studies. To investigate the heterogeneity of the studies, the I2 index was used. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software version 11.1. The number of participants in the 51 studies was 5352. The mean total IQ score in Iran was estimated 97.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.71–105.52), the practical intelligence was 92.84 (95% CI: 79.14–106.55), and the verbal intelligence was 94.50 (95% CI: 83.90–105.10). The total IQ score in the northern, southern, central, eastern, and western regions of Iran was 97.08, 108.90, 92.31, 101.76, and 96.45, respectively. The mean IQ score in Iran in subjects under 20 years of age is 97.73 and in subjects over 20 years of age is 105.61. There is also no significant relationship between the mean total IQ in Iran and two parameters of the year of research and number of research samples. For prevention of decrease IQ and given that proper nutrition and breastfeeding directly contribute to increase IQ, nutrition should be provided free of charge in poorer areas during pregnancy until baby born. Moreover, the media should provide adequate education for breastfeeding and nutrition, because IQ affects people's academic, occupational, personal, and social performance, and also prevents elite immigration with suitable planning and provides conditions for elites to return to the country.
Keywords: Iran, intelligence quotient, meta-analysis, practical intelligence, verbal intelligence, Wechsler
Introduction
Old investigators considered intelligence to be a general or attribute factor that manifests itself in a wide range of behaviors, but later psychologists have stated that intelligence is a set of relatively independent abilities.[1] The analytical concept of the intelligence in Western countries is more cognitive that involves information processing, whereas the Oriental Combined Approach to intelligence encompasses the various components of human performance and experience, including cognition, intuition, and excitement, in an integrated relationship.[2]
Intelligence quotient (IQ) is a number with the mean of 100 and the standard deviation of 15. The IQ is a ratio, the result of dividing the percentage of rational age divided by the calendar age multiplied by 100. Hence, in the classification and division of intelligence, nearly 70% of people have middle intelligence, 12% have intelligence above the middle, 2% are very intelligent, and 1% have been identified as highly selected people.[3,4] The low IQ level is one of the most common and important medical, social, and familial problems in all countries with a similar prevalence of at least 2–3%.[5]
Intelligence is one of the significant means of compromising individuals with the environment and is among the important factors of individual differences.[6] Intelligence and memory affect the academic achievement, career development, and social behavior of individuals. Because memory cannot be seen, touched, or measured with physical instruments, the Wechsler intelligence test, which is valid and reliable, is used to assess the intelligence of individuals.[7] Wechsler believed that intelligence includes the individual's ability to reasonably think, act purposefully, and deal effectively with the environment, and thus, it can have social, practical, or abstractive IQ.[8]
Individual intelligence consists of two parts including verbal intelligence and practical intelligence. The verbal intelligence refers to the degree of fluency in the language. In other words, this type of intelligence refers to the ability to use and understand a rhetorical language that helps people remember things and express them.[9] Practical intelligence is what most people call “common sense.” Practical intelligence in daily life is useful and necessary because without practical intelligence, in the cultural context, or in the natural environment of life, one cannot survive.[10] According to numerous studies conducted in the field of IQ assessment using the Wechsler scale in Iran, the estimation of mean IQ with Wechsler scale in Iran was by a systematic review and meta-analysis was the main aim of the current study.
Methods
Search strategy
The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted through the review of existing articles and dissertations. To access the documentation in Iran, internal and external databases including Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Springer, SID, Magiran, Iranmedex, Medlib, and Google Scholar motor search were searched using the relevance keywords without time limits. The documents found were specified to the period from 1989 to 2017. This study was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis.[11] In order to maximize the search comprehensiveness, internal databases were searched using general Persian words such as “IQ, Intelligence, Verbal Intelligence, Wechsler, Meta-Analysis, and Iran.” For English databases, the Latin and Mesh equivalents and their combinations were used with AND, OR operators. To find more studies, the sources of other articles were searched manually.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Entry criteria included the studies that examined the general intelligence, verbal intelligence, or practical intelligence in Iran using the Wechsler scale. Exit criteria included the studies conducted in countries other than Iran, studies with nonrandom samples, nonquality studies, studies that did not include the required information (such as total intelligence score, verbal intelligence, practical intelligence, and sample number), and studies that used a tool other than the Wechsler intelligence test to measure human intelligence.
Qualitative assessment of studies
In order to assess the quality of the studies, the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology[12] was used. This checklist consists of 22 different sections, with a score of 0–44 and a minimum score of 16 points.
Data extraction
To reduce the bias and error in collecting data, two researchers extracted data from articles independently and using data extraction form including name of the author, year and place of the study, number of samples, overall intelligence score, verbal intelligence score, practical intelligence score, number of women and men, and so on, and the third researcher will examine the data in order to correct the data in case of conflict.
Questionnaire
In this research, the Wechsler intelligence test was used. This scale, designed by Wechsler, measures the intelligence in both practical and verbal dimensions, which has 11 subscales including 6 verbal scale and 5 practical scales. The subtests of general information, numeric memory, vocabulary, computing, comprehension and similarities, verbal intelligence and image completion, image adjustment, cube design, and component insertion make practical intelligence. Each subscale has a raw score and a standard score. Each person ultimately has a verbal intelligence, a practical intelligence, and a general intelligence.[13,14]
Statistical analysis
Considering that the IQ score and its subgroups were quantitative, the mean and standard deviations of these indices were extracted in each study and the variance of the meanings was calculated using the normal distribution. Due to heterogeneity between studies, a random-effects model was used to combine their results. To investigate the heterogeneity of the studies, the I2 index was used. The sensitivity analysis was used to show that the deletion of each study might affect the final outcome of the study. The meta-regression was also used to investigate the relationship between the intelligence of Iranians and the number of samples and years of research and explore of heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software version 11.1.
Results
Summary of how to enter studies into the meta-analysis process
The number of participants in the 51 studies was 5352. The characteristics of the papers examined are listed in Table 1 and the stages of the entry of studies into the meta-analysis process are presented in Graph 1 and Figure 1.
Table 1.
Author | Year of study | City of study | Age | Type of study | Overall IQ (mean) | Overall IQ (SD) | Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bezorgyan[13] | 2012 | Yasouj | 28.08 | - | 79.42 | 8.55 | 100 |
Rahimian Bugar[15] | 2009 | Semnan | 9-11 | Causal-comparative | 94.05 | 16.11 | 90 |
Sharifi[16] | 2007 | Chaharmahal va bakhtyari | 6-15 | Causal-comparative | 89.56 | 11.68 | 104 |
Sheykh Mounesi[17] | 2008 | Mazandaran | - | Causal-comparative | 100.87 | 13 | 80 |
Mehry Nejad[18] | 2006 | Tehran | <11 | - | 107.63 | 9.54 | 500 |
Araghizade[7] | 2005 | Tehran | >40 | - | - | - | 64 |
Fathi Ashtiani[14] | 1999 | Tehran | 9 | - | - | - | 60 |
Ebrahimi[19] | 2000 | Isfahan | >40 | - | 82.29 | 19.02 | 80 |
Bagheri[20] | 2000 | Tabriz | 7 | Causal-comparative | - | - | 240 |
Soleymani[21] | 2011 | Tehran | 4-6.5 | Association study | 108.24 | 9.45 | 42 |
Tavakoli[22] | 2007 | Isfahan | 27 | Association study | 88.06 | - | 29 |
Razavi[23] | 2010-2011 | Neyshabur | 5-6.5 | Descriptive-analytical | - | - | 80 |
Alizade[24] | 2015-2016 | Isfahan | 7-15 | Before-after study | 98.85 | 13.65 | 27 |
Soghraei Karbalaei[25] | 2016 | Systan and Baluchestan | 12-18 | Descriptive-analytical | 79 | 6 | 86 |
Ghasem Tabar[26] | 2015 | Tehran | 5 | Before-after study | - | - | 30 |
Nasri[27] | 2013-2014 | Rasht | 8 | Before-after study | 96.9 | 4.01 | 60 |
Atadokht[28] | 2012-2013 | Ardebil | 7-11 | Causal-comparative | 98.33 | 11.01 | 100 |
Manshaei[29] | 2012-2013 | Isfahan | 6-12 | Causal-comparative | - | - | 90 |
Dalvand[30] | 2008 | Tehran | 4-8 | Semi-experimental | 93 | 2.47 | 20 |
Mahreyar[31] | 2002 | Shiraz | - | Causal-comparative | 95.39 | 12.84 | 236 |
Mahram[32] | 2003 | Zanjan | 7.3 | Historical cohort | 89.26 | 9.96 | 126 |
Sadeghi Poor[33] | 2001 | Tehran | 4-13 | Historical cohort | 111.48 | 10 | 191 |
Azizi[34] | 2005 | Tehran | 4-7 | Historical cohort | 103 | 13.07 | 82 |
Nasiri Amiri[35] | 2004-2007 | Babol | 6-7 | Prospective cohort | 95.43 | 14.41 | 120 |
Yasseri[36] | 2005 | - | 25-45 | - | 109.35 | 52 | |
Shiri Aminloo[37] | 2012-2013 | - | 6-12 | - | 99.03 | 11.53 | 298 |
Yaghoubi[38] | 2007 | Tehran | - | Semi-experimental | 108.75 | 6.2 | 16 |
Mahmoodi Rad[39] | 2007 | Tehran | 9 | Before-after study | 92.4 | 8.05 | 48 |
Khoshouei[40] | 2010-2011 | Isfahan | 6-7 | Comparative | - | - | 50 |
Ashuri[41] | 2009-2010 | Tehran | 13-17 | Before-after study | 64.65 | 2.91 | 20 |
Hashemi[42] | 2008-2009 | Fars | 6-9 | Semi-experimental | 85.6 | 9.08 | 23 |
Abdi[43] | 2011 | Tehran | 30-50 | - | 102.5 | 4.67 | 50 |
Alipour[1] | 2011 | Tehran | - | Descriptive | 28.53 | 2.97 | 120 |
Rezaei[44] | 2010-2011 | Tabriz | 22.1 | Descriptive | 165.92 | 28.31 | 315 |
Jabbari[45] | 2001 | Shiraz | 10-12 | Comparative | 98.14 | 3.67 | 160 |
Talebian[46] | 2004-2006 | Tehran | 4-6 | Historical cohort | 100 | 16.23 | 102 |
Rahmani[47] | 2012 | Sanandaj | 27.06 | Before-after study | 93.58 | 10.34 | 60 |
Vaezi[9] | 2012 | Tehran | 8-10 | - | 97.79 | 11.69 | 25 |
Hashemi[48] | 2009-2011 | Fars | 6-9 | Experimental | 96.5 | 12.42 | 60 |
Ashtari[49] | 2013 | Isfahan | 19-60 | Cross-sectional | 82.56 | 8.91 | 100 |
Saremi[50] | 2013-2015 | Mashhad | 20-40 | Causal-comparative | 109.92 | 4.7 | 70 |
Ghaffari[51] | 2011 | Mazandaran | 6-14 | Comparative | 108.8 | 11.92 | 180 |
Ahmadi[52] | 2014 | Yazd | 6-9 | - | 105.87 | - | 75 |
Khadem[53] | 2010 | Mashhad | 6-7 | Cross-sectional | 100.4 | 4.33 | 372 |
Faramarzi[54] | 2011-2012 | Babol | 5-6.5 | Cross-sectional | 109.6 | 13.41 | 60 |
Tonekaboni[55] | 2003-2004 | Tehran | 6-12 | - | 94.42 | 18.8 | 45 |
Azizi[56] | 2002 | Tehran | 3-11 | - | 114.73 | 12.7 | 53 |
Azizi[57] | 1377 | Tehran | 4-6 | - | 103 | 13.29 | 31 |
Najmi[58] | 2013 | Isfahan | 4.5 | Comparative | 97.1 | 9.66 | 120 |
Mahram[59] | 2009 | Zanjan | 6 | Cohort | 96.5 | 9.66 | 130 |
Ordooei[60] | 2007 | Yazd | 5 | Case-control | 108.9 | 2.78 | 80 |
The mean total IQ score in Iran was 97.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.71–105.52), practical intelligence was 92.84 (95% CI: 79.14–106.55), and verbal intelligence was 94.50 (95% CI: 83.90–105.10) [Graphs 1-3].
According to the graph,[4] there is no meaningful relation between the mean total intelligence score in Iran and the number of research samples (P = 0.076) [Graph 4]. According to the graph,[5] there is also no significant relationship between the mean total IQ in Iran and the year of research (P = 0.520) [Graph 5].
Discussion
The sample size was 5352 in 51 of the studied researches. The mean total IQ was 12.97, practical intelligence was 84.92, and verbal intelligence was 94.35. The results show that verbal intelligence score in Iran is more than practical intelligence. In a study by Joshua Isen in the United States, the mean and standard deviation of the practical intelligence score was 89.64 ± 13.35 and the verbal intelligence score was 94.24 ± 14.[61] The verbal intelligence score was greater than the intelligence score, consistent with our study.
In addition, the total IQ score in the northern, southern, central, eastern, and western regions of Iran was 97.08, 108.90, 92.31, 101.76, and 96.45, respectively. Based on these results, the people of southern Iran have the highest IQ and the people of the central region of Iran have the lowest IQ [Table 2].
Table 2.
Subgroups | Number of study | Mean IQ | 95% CI | P for heterogeneity | I2 (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||
Overall IQ | 41 | 97.12 | 88.71 | 105.52 | 0.000 | 99.9 |
Practical IQ | 27 | 94.50 | 83.90 | 105.10 | 0.000 | 99.9 |
Verbal IQ | 32 | 92.84 | 79.14 | 106.55 | 0.000 | 100 |
Climate | ||||||
North | 19 | 97.08 | 80.15 | 114.01 | 0.000 | 100 |
South | 1 | 108.90 | 108.90 | 109.51 | - | - |
Center | 9 | 92.31 | 88.04 | 96.57 | 0.000 | 97.8 |
West | 7 | 101.76 | 86.31 | 117.22 | 0.000 | 99.7 |
East | 3 | 96.45 | 82.73 | 100.34 | 0.000 | 99.9 |
Age | ||||||
>20 | 30 | 97.73 | 94.21 | 101.24 | 0.000 | 99.5 |
>20 | 6 | 105.61 | 88.92 | 122.31 | 0.000 | 100 |
An analysis based on the age of the participants showed that the mean IQ score in Iran in subjects under 20 years of age is 97.73 and in subjects over 20 years of age is 105.61. This suggests that the intelligence of Iranians increases with age and adults are more intelligent than children and adolescents.
In the graph,[4] meta-regression showed no significant relationship between the general IQ in Iran and the number of research samples. Thus, by increasing the number of samples, the average total IQ in Iran will not increase. Graph[5] also showed no meaningful relationship between the general intelligence score in Iran and the year of research. During the years under review, from 1367 to 1396, the mean total IQ in Iran has decreased, but this decline was not statistically significant.
Sensitivity analysis showed that by eliminating Rezaei et al.[44] study in 2011, the mean IQ increased to 95.39% (95% CI: 87.01–103.77), and by eliminating Alipour et al. study[1] in 2011, this amount will increase to 98.82 (95% CI: 95.40–102.23). As a result, these two studies are the most effective studies in obtaining the final result.
According to statistics and measurements conducted in Western countries, the average IQ of the first year students of universities is between 100 and 110. Masters and Ph.D. students have an IQ of over 120 and 130.[62] According to the global ranking, Iran with an average IQ of 84 is in the 98th position, which can improve its position using the results of this study. Also according to the results of the study by Joseph et al. in the United States, the average overall IQ was 85/90.[63] According to the statistics, Iranian intelligence is more than the people of the United States. The results of the study showed that breast milk, breakfast, and proper education during the study had a direct impact on the increase in IQ. Other factors which had impact on IQ are chronic diseases, administration of proper antioxidants, and other micronutrients[56,64,65,66,67,68,69] Because families with high incomes have a better and more moderate diet than low-income families,[70] chronic diseases affect mental, physical, and psychological status.[71,72,73,74]
The main limitations of this research included the failure to provide accurate statistics on the IQ of other countries in existing resources, the lack of access to the full text of some articles, and the inability of internal databases to combine the keywords.
Conclusions
The people of Iran have high intelligence and their verbal intelligence is more than their practical intelligence. From the geographic point of view, the people of southern Iran have the highest intelligence and the people of eastern Iran have the least IQ. In terms of age, people under the age of 20 years have a lower IQ than people over the age of 20 years. According to the results of meta-analysis, Iran's IQs have decreased in recent years, but this decline has not been statistically significant. Given that proper nutrition and breastfeeding directly contribute to IQ, nutrition should be provided free of charge in poorer areas during pregnancy until baby born. Moreover, the media should provide adequate education for breastfeeding and nutrition, because IQ affects people's academic, occupational, personal, and social performance.
Ethical considerations
Ethical issues (including plagiarism, data fabrication, double publication) have been completely observed by the authors.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Alipoor A, Saleh Mirhoseini V. Handedness and intelligence: Compare intelligence (verbal and practical) and its subscales between left-handed and right-handed. J Educ Psychol. 2011;7:1–22. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nasel D. Spiritual orientation in relation to Spiritual intelligence: A consideration of traditional Christianity and new age/ individualistic spirituality. Christianity: University of South Australia. 2004:1186. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Horn J, Cattell R. Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. J Educ Psychol. 1966;57:253–70. doi: 10.1037/h0023816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Black K, Hynd G. Epilepsy in the school aged child: Cognitive-behavioral characteristic and effect on Academic performance. Sch Psychol Q. 1995;10:345–58. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Donna K, Daily D, Holly H, Ardinger H, Grace E, Holmes G. Identification and evaluation of mental retardation. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:1059–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ehsani M, Sabarad L, Jahanian I, Kheirkhah F. The relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement among dental students at Babol University of Medical Sciences. J Educ Develop Jundishapur. 2014;5:80–7. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Araghizade H, Mirzamani S, Lak M, Sadrian M. The effect of general anesthesia and spinal cord round-memory close. Kosar Med J. 2005;10:293–8. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taghva M, Abdollahi H. The effect of big five personality factors on emotional intelligence and organizational change and improvement. Manage Stud Dev Evol. 2013;23:23–48. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vaezi S, Zolfaghari Ardchi F, Rahimi E. Cognitive processing in bilingual and monolingual children. Thinking and Children. 2012;3:119–34. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sternberg R, Okagaki L, Jackson A. Practical intelligence for success in school. Educational Leadership. 1990;48:35–9. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, All E. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev J. 2015;4:1–9. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gøtzsche P, Vandenbroucke J. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bezorgyan N, Zare H, Kheramin S, Anjamrouz H, Zare H, Kheramin S, et al. Comparison of cognitive functions of patients with substance dependency and normal people in WAIS subscales. Armaghan-e-Danesh. 2012;17:469–76. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fathi ashtiani A, Zandie A. Compare intelligence verbal and nonverbal students with dyslexia-false draft with normal students. J Psychol. 5:345–60. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rahimian Bugar E, Najafi M. Comparison the performance of children with and without learning disorders in The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised Quarterly. Psychol Except Individ. 2015;6:56–80. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sharifi T, Rabiei M. Using Wechsler Intelligence Scale-4 for diagnosing children with learning disorders writing and math. J Learn Disabil. 2013;2:59–75. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sheykh Mounesi F, Shahsavari M, Jafarzadeh A, Khademlo M. Creativity and intelligence quotient in bipolar disorder patients and their offspring: A case-control study. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2010;20:55–60. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mehry Nejad S. Comparison of visual motor coordination ability, attention, intelligence, learning disorder and behavioral disorder in Immature and normal children. CPAP. 2006;13:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ebrahimi A, Musavi S, Samuei R. Review and compare the cognitive functioning of patients with schizophrenia in the first episode of the disease and a control group. Res Med Sci. 2003;8:97–101. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bagheri S, Khani M. Comparison of pre-school education centers under the guise of well-being and education of male and female learners with control intelligence. J Teaching Learn Stud. 2013;5:23–46. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Soleymani Z, Keramati N, Rouhani F, Jalaie S, Alaee M. The effect of the age of treatment Monset and quality of dietary control on language and intelligence functions in patients with Phenylketonuria. Audiol. 2013;22:42–51. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tavakoli M, Barekatain M, Taher Neshat Doust H, Molavi H, Kormi Nouri R, Moradi A, et al. Cognitive impairments in patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16:1466–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Razavi A, Haghighat S, Vaaezi T. Language development and intelligence in preschoolers. QJOE. 2016;31:105–20. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alizade M, Haghayegh S. Understanding the relationships between executive functions and intelligence quotient with academic performance of students diagnosed as having level 1 of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) JOEC. 2016;16:65–74. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Soghraei Karbalaei F, Afrooz G, Raghibi M. Investigation of biological characteristics, personality and IQ in delinquent adolescents in Sistan and Baluchestan province. Res Educ Syst. 2016;10:189–208. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ghasem Tabar S, Hoseini M, Hajitabar Firuzjaei M, Gudarzi N. The effectiveness of music education on pre-school children's mental abilities. Q J Educ Psychol. 2015;11:139–59. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nasri S, Karimi Lichahi R. The comparison of the effectiveness of multi-sensory and perceptual-motor training method in improving reading skills dyslexic students. J Learn Disabil. 2016:141–7. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Atadokht A, Yagobi V, Basharpoor S, Zare R. The diagnostic capability of the wechsler intelligence scale for children in quickly diagnosis of students with special learning disability. J Learn Disabil. 2014;4:121–8. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Manshaei G, Asli Azad M, Faramarzi S, Karimi Jozestani L, Arefi M, Farhadi T. Comparing the intelligence profiles of children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and children with learning disabilities with normal children. JPEN. 2015;1:61–73. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dalvand H, Dehghan L, Feizi A, Amirsalari S, Shamsaei M. Effectiveness of space suit in improvement of motor activity of 4-8 years old children with spastic cerebral palsy with normal IQ. Kosar Med J. 2008;13:303–7. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mahreyar A, Ahadi H, Shafi Abadi A, Javidi H. Comparison of mental abilities and memory between normal students and students with symptoms of obsession. Know Res Educ Psychol. 2002:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mahram M. Relationship IQ in children living in areas with lead mine. J Improv. 2003;7:36–42. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sadeghi Poor H, Siah Kolah B, Riahi Asl B, Rezaei Ghale N, Hadian M, Jalilvand M, et al. Mother's fasting during pregnancy and the infant's IQ. J Res Med Sci. 2004;28:191–7. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Azizi F, Bahreinian M, Khamse M, Khoshneiat Nikoo M. Thyroid function and intellectual development in infant whose mothers receive methimazole. Res Med. 2005;29:207–11. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nasiri Amiri F, Salavati A, Hajiahamadi M, Salmalian H, Ahmadi A. Correlation between the type of delivery and intelligence quotient in children at 6 to 7 years of age. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2010;12:19–24. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yasseri G, Moradi A, Shahraray M. Autobiographical memory performance and PTSD symptoms in survivors of cancer. Psychol Res. 2006;8:84–98. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shiri Aminloo M, Kamkary K, Shokrzadeh S. The concurrent validity of the new version of the Tehran-Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Except Educ. 2013;7:50–61. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yaghoubi H, Jazayeri A, Khoushabi K, Dolatshahi B, Niknam Z. Neurofeedback specification efficacy on intelligent performance of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children. Arch Rehabil. 2007;8:40–52. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mahmoodi Rad M. Investigating the role of communication skills training and social problem solving in promoting self-esteem and its relationship with the intelligence functions and academic achievement of students. J Dis Iran Children. 2002;13:71–6. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khoshouei M, Mirlohi F. Performance of slow-learner students in first grade of elementary school in Wechsler, Leiter and good enough intelligence scales. Arch Rehabil. 2014;15:44–51. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ashuri M, Mir Zamani S, Jalil Abkar S, Adib Sarkeshi N. A study on the effectiveness of pate booster on educational achievement in the empirical science curriculum of mentally disabled students in the third grade. Rehabilitation. 2010;11:73–9. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hashemi S, Monshizadeh L, Alipour A. Effects of cochlear implantation and associated rehabilitation services on the development of verbal and non-verbal intelligence of 6-9 years old deaf children with cochlear implants. Koomesh. 2011;13:93–9. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Abdi A, Moradi A, Akramian F, Fathi Ashtiani A. Autobiographical memory performance in cancer survivors with PTSD. J Behav Sci. 2012;6:60–8. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rezaei A. Standardization and psychometric properties of multidimensional aptitude battery (MAB) Q J Educ Meas. 2012;3:35–62. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jabbari S, Khademi M. A comparative study on the effect of teaching comprehension skills with modern cognitive strategies and traditional methods of reading comprehension of fourth and fifth grade elementary students with reading difficulties and students with no reading problems. Learn Educ Stud (Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University) 2009;1:19–57. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Talebian D, Radfar S, Gholami Fesharaki M, Aghamiri Z, Habibi M, Anvari S, et al. Relationship between the type of delivery and the actions taken in NICU of Najmieh Hospital on the IQ of premature infants born between 2004 and 2006. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2011;3:71–8. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rahmani F, Kiani M, Rezaei F, Nasuri M. The relation of of marriage and gender in the effects of aversive situations on intellectual functioningin borderline personality disorder. J Fam Couns Psychother. 2011;2:388–411. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hashemi S, Monshizadeh L. The effect of cochlear implantation in development of intelligence quotient of 6–9 deaf children in comparison with normal hearing children (Iran, 2009-2011) Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:802–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ashtari F, Emami P, Akbari M. Association between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and magnetic resonance imaging findings and intelligence in patients with multiple sclerosis. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:223. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.166646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Saremi A, Shariat S, Nazari M, Dolatshahi B. Neuropsychological functioning in obsessive-compulsive washers: Drug-naive without depressive symptoms. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2017;8:233–48. doi: 10.18869/nirp.bcn.8.3.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ghaffari J, Abbaskhanian A, Jalili M, Yazdani Charati Y. IQ Score of children with persistent or perennial allergic rhinitis: Comparison with healthy children. Iran J Child Neurol. 2014;8:44–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ahmadi N, Mohammadi M, Araghi S, Zarafshan H. Neurocognitive profile of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD): A comparison between subtypes. Iran J Psychiatry. 2014;9:197–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Khadem N, Khadivzadeh T. The intelligence quotient of school aged children delivered by cesarean section and vaginal delivery. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2010;15:135–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Faramarzi M, Golsorkhtabaramiri M, Esmaeilzadeh S, Ghofrani F, Sorkhi H. Are children born through Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) having a lower intelligence quotient.? Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2016;21:16–21. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tonekaboni S, Beyraghi N, Tahbaz H, Bahreynian S, Aghamohammadpoor M. Neurocognitive effects of phenobarbital discontinuation in epileptic children. Epilepsy Behav. 2006;8:145–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Azizi F, Khamseh M, Bahreynian M, Hedayati M. Thyroid function and intellectual development of children of mothers taking methimazole during pregnancy. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25:586–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03345080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Azizi F, Khoshniat M, Bahrainian M, Hedayati M. Thyroid function and intellectual development of infants nursed by mothers taking methimazole. J Clin Endocrinol Metab Printed USA. 2000;85:3233–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Najmi S, Hashemipour M, Maracy M, Hovsepian S, Ghasemi M. Intelligence quotient in children with congenital hypothyroidism: The effect of diagnostic and treatment variables. Res Med Sci. 2013;18:395–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mahram M, Mousavinasab N, Gooran Urimei A. Intelligence quotient (IQ) and growth indices in children with the history of low birth weight. Iran J Pediatr. 2009;19:387–92. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ordooei M, Mottaghi Pisheh H, Fallah R, Rabiee A. Cognitive outcomes for congenital hypothyroid and healthy children: A comparative study. Iran J Child Neurol. 2014;8:28–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Isen J. A meta-analytic assessment of Wechsler's PNV sign in antisocial populations. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:423–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shariati M, Nezarat N. One hundred students of exceptional karyotype (an IQ less) South Med J. 2003;6:127–33. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Joseph J, Sistino J, Bonilha H. Improvements in survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes in surgical treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: A meta-analytic review. J Extra Corpor Techno. 2012;44:216–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ardalan M-R, Nasri H. Lessons from our paleolithic primogenitors; A short look to the world diabetes day 2014 with the theme of “healthy living and diabetes”. J Parathyr Dis. 2014;2:57–8. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Asgari A. Herbal medicines and kidney; friends or foes? J Nephropharmacol. 2014;3:5–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hassanpour Dehkordi A, Mohammadi N, Nikbakhat Nasrabadi A. Hepatitis-related stigma in chronic patients: A qualitative study. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;29:206–10. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jafari T. Antioxidants; helpful or harmful? Ann Res Antioxid. 2016;1:e13. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nasri H. The adverse effects of vitamin D deficiency on health. J Renal Endocrinol. 2017;3:3. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shahreza FD. From oxidative stress to endothelial cell dysfunction. J Prev Epidemiol. 2016;1:e04. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Victora CG, Horta BL, De Mola CL, Quevedo L, Pinheiro RT, Gigante DP, et al. Association between breastfeeding and intelligence, educational attainment, and income at 30 years of age: A prospective birth cohort study from Brazil. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3:e199–e205. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70002-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dehkordi AH. Influence of yoga and aerobics exercise on fatigue, pain and psychosocial status in patients with multiple sclerosis: A Randomized Trial. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016;56:1417–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hasanpour-Dehkordi A, Khaledi-Far A, Khaledi-Far B, Salehi-Tali S. The effect of family training and support on the quality of life and cost of hospital readmissions in congestive heart failure patients in Iran. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;31:165–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mohammadi N, HassanpourDehkordi A, NikbakhatNasrabadi A. Iranian patients with chronic hepatitis struggle to do self-care. Life Sci J. 2013;10:457–62. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Shahbazi K, Solati K, Hasanpour-Dehkordi A. Comparison of hypnotherapy and standard medical treatment alone on quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A Randomized Control Trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:OC01. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17631.7713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]