Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Helv Chim Acta. 2018 Oct;101(10):e1800112. doi: 10.1002/hlca.201800112

Cell Penetration, Herbicidal Activity, and in-vivo-Toxicity of Oligo-Arginine Derivatives and of Novel Guanidinium-Rich Compounds Derived from the Biopolymer Cyanophycin

Marcel Grogg a, Donald Hilvert a, Marc-Olivier Ebert a, Albert K Beck a, Dieter Seebach a,*, Felix Kurth b,1, Petra S Dittrich b, Christof Sparr c, Sergio Wittlin d, Matthias Rottmann d, Pascal Mäser d
PMCID: PMC6426238  EMSID: EMS82029  PMID: 30905972

Abstract

Oligo-arginines are thoroughly studied cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs, Figures 1 and 2). Previous in-vitro investigations with the octaarginine salt of the phosphonate fosmidomycin (herbicide and anti-malaria drug) have shown a 40-fold parasitaemia inhibition with P. falciparum, compared to fosmidomycin alone (Figure 3). We have now tested this salt, as well as the corresponding phosphinate salt of the herbicide glufosinate, for herbicidal activity with whole plants by spray application, hoping for increased activities, i.e. decreased doses. However, both salts showed low herbicidal activity, indicating poor foliar uptake (Table 1). Another pronounced difference between in-vitro and in-vivo activity was demonstrated with various cell-penetrating octaarginine salts of fosmidomycin: intravenous injection to mice caused exitus of the animals within minutes, even at doses as low as 1.4 μmol/kg (Table 2). The results show that use of CPPs for drug delivery, for instance to cancer cells and tissues, must be considered with due care. The biopolymer cyanophycin is a poly-aspartic acid containing argininylated side chains (Figure 4); its building block is the dipeptide H-βAsp-αArg-OH (H-Adp-OH). To test and compare the biological properties with those of octaarginines we synthesized Adp8-derivatives (Figure 5). Intravenouse injection of H-Adp8-NH2 into the tail vein of mice with doses as high as 45 μmol/kg causes no symptoms whatsoever (Table 3), but H-Adp8-NH2 is not cell penetrating (HEK293 and MCF-7 cells, Figure 6). On the other hand, the fluorescently labeled octamers FAM-(Adp(OMe))8-NH2 and FAM-(Adp(NMe2))8-NH2 with ester and amide groups in the side chains exhibit mediocre to high cell-wall permeability (Figure 6), and are toxic (Table 3). Possible reasons for this behavior are discussed (Figure 7) and corresponding NMR spectra are presented (Figure 8).

Keywords: guanidinium-rich peptides, biopolymer cyanophycin, dipeptide Adp (H-βAsp-αArg-OH), fosmidomycin, glufosinate, herbicidal activity, in-vivo toxicity, cell penetration, confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM)

Introduction

Guanidinium-rich compounds (GRCs) are among the most extensively studied cell-penetrating substances. The guanidinium groups (GGs) are usually attached to backbones, which may be simple oligo-α- or -β-arginines or other oligopeptides with attached GGs, as for instance oligoprolines; other reported backbones include oligo-peptoids, -carbonates, -carbamates, -disulfides, -phosphates, -glycosides, peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), inositol, or dendrimers. As an entry into the field we refer to a review article with historical background by P. Wender, one of the discoverers[1][2] of oligo-arginine cell-penetration,[15] to an overview on cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) by one of the experts in the field Ü. Langel,[6][7] to a recent article discussing the role of flexibility of attachment and of distance between the GGs on the backbone,[8] to the design and testing of a sophisticated disulfide polymer backbone with guanidinylated side chains that carries a fluorescent cargo into cell nucleoli,[9][10] and to clinical applications.[11] A schematic presentation of guanidinium-rich systems is presented in Figure 1,2 together with an extreme case, in which the guanidinium moieties are actually part of the backbone.[15]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Guanidinium-rich structures. a) The guanidinium groups (GGs) are attached to various backbones, mostly oligo-peptides. The rate of cell penetration and the peptidolytic stability depend upon the nature of the backbone (a), the length and flexibility of the connecting units (b), the distance (c) between the GGs, and the number (n) of GG-bearing units. Cargoes (d), such as fluorescent groups or bioactive moieties to be delivered into cells are attached to the backbone. b) A cell-penetrating oligomer, in which GGs are part of the backbone.[15]

While a majority of CPP investigations deals with derivatives of natural products, such as Tat, Antp, and Penetratin, and with the artificial compounds oligo-l- and -d-arginines (1),[16][1114] commonly specified as Rn and rn, our work has focused on the unnatural oligo-β-arginines (2, 3 in Figure 2) and their fluorescently[1624] or radioactively[21] labeled and covalently modified[22] derivatives.3 They rapidly enter eukaryotic cells (3T3 mouse fibroblasts,[16][19] HeLa cells,[17] HEK293 cells,[20] human hepatocytes, fibroblasts, macrophages, infected but not ‘healthy’ erythrocytes,[19] and Plasmodium falciparum, a eukaryotic microorganism[19]), as well as prokaryotic cells (Bacillus megaterium, Escherichia coli);[18] they also penetrate deep into mouse skin,[17] just like the analogous α-peptidic oligo-arginines.[26] The most pronounced property of the oligo-β-arginines, which they share with all β-peptides, tested so far, is their peptidolytic and metabolic stability in vitro and in vivo. Thus, after i.v. administration to male albino rats (Han Wistar) all of the radioactively labeled octa-β-arginine 2b remained chemically unchanged and was enriched in various tissues of the animals after 4 days (< 2% excretion), while with peroral administration almost the complete dose was recovered in feces within 24 h. No toxic effects were observed with the concentrations employed and under the conditions used[21] (vide infra). Like their α-peptidic counterparts the oligo-β-arginines do not enter anionic lipid-POPC/POPG vesicles.[20][24] Rather, they attach to the vesicle surfaces, disrupt the structure of the membrane and make it permeable, causing, for instance, calcein release from vesicles.[24]4

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Frequently investigated oligo-arginines (1, Rn), their enantiomers (ent-1, rn) and β-octaarginine derivatives (2, β3-Rn and 3, β2-Rn). The C-terminal group is NH2, due to the solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) by the Fmoc technology on Pal-PEG-PS-type resins. The N-terminal group R may be a hydrogen atom, a fluorescent marker, or a cargo moiety with biological activity to be carried into cells. As pointed out in footnote 6 below, the product obtained by an Fmoc-octaarginine synthesis, followed by HPLC purification and lyophilization is actually the nona-triflate salt 1a-9TFA. For FAM derivatives see Figure 5 and the section on CFM; for a Cy5 derivative see Table 2, below.

4:1-Salts of Fosmidomycin and Glufosinate with Octaarginines and Test of Herbicidal Activity

Inspired by investigations of the Matile group[28] on the importance of polyion-counter-ion complexes for cell penetration5 and remembering the perfect fit between guanidinium groups and so-called oxy-anions (Figure 3,a) that had been used in organic synthesis and in supramolecular chemistry,[3036] we had prepared the 1:4 salt 1a-4Fos of octaarginine amide and fosmidomycin to test its in vitro activity against P. falciparum, and we were able to report in 2013 that growth of this parasite (which causes malaria) was much more strongly reduced by the salt than by fosmidomycin itself (Figure 3,b and c).[37]6

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Salts with guanidinium groups. a) Perfect match of counter-ions in guanidinium salts with symmetrical dibasic anions; carboxylates, phosphonates, phosphates (see also d) in Figure 7, below), sulfonates, and sulfates are common in biological systems. b) Salts of the octaarginines 1a and 2a with the physiologically active compounds fosmidomycin (herbicide, antimalarial drug) and glufosinate (herbicide). c) left side: Enhanced efficacy of fosmidomycin against blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum, when used as the salt 1a-4Fos (in-vitro test); red: course over 72 h of parasitaemia when untreated; other colors: parasitaemia when treated with 0.1 – 5.0 μm of the 1:4 salt 1a-4Fos. c) right side: IC50 for growth inhibition in the presence of fosmidomycin alone (181.4 nm, red) and in the presence of the salt 1a-4Fos (4.4 nm). The two diagrams are taken from ref.[37]

Fosmidomycin, a phosphonic-acid derivative, was first isolated as a natural product from Streptomyces rubellomurinus;[38] it is commercially available as the Na-salt7 and was originally used as an herbicide; it inhibits the enzyme DOXP reductoisomerase (DXR) of the non-mevalonate pathway leading to isoprenoids in plants and in unicellular organisms, such as the eukaryotic P. falciparum or mycobacteria (causing malaria, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, or lepra, see the discussion and references in[37]). The ca. 40-fold decrease of P. falciparum growth rate caused by the salt 1a-4Fos (Figure 3) shows that the cell-penetrating octaarginine with its fosmidomycin cargo passes the most complex cell wall of this eukaryotic microorganism for delivery of the inhibitor to the active site of the enzyme DXR.

The successful application of octaarginine for transporting an antibiotic compound into the parasite causing malaria drew our attention to another interesting phosphorous derivative: phosphinothricin, a phosphinic-acid (Figure 3), the l- or (S)-form of which was first isolated and identified by the Zähner group in Tübingen in 1972,[39][40] as a component of the tripeptide phosphinothricyl-Ala-Ala (from Streptomyces viridochromogenes). Phosphinothricin is a potent glutamate-synthetase inhibitor, the ammonium salt of the racemic form, glufosinate, is a widely used non-selective herbicide. Extensive use of glufosinate has led to reports of evolved weed resistance,[41] in which case much higher levels/amounts of the herbicide are required to control the resistant weeds. It would therefore be highly desirable to be able to increase the glufosinate activity, and thus reduce the necessary dosis, cf. the 40-fold in vitro activity increase when going from fosmidomycin to its octaarginine salt described above. Thus, we prepared the salt 1a-4Glufos from the free phosphinic acid and octaarginine by the same procedure described above for the corresponding fosmidomycin salt and tested its activities in comparison with the corresponding ammonium salt and with 1a-4Fos. The post-emergence herbicidal activity of all three compounds was compared at 13 days after application, using 0.5% Tween 20 as the adjuvant. The plants species listed in Table 1 were assessed 13 days after herbicide application – 0% meaning no effect and 100% meaning complete kill. All samples were sprayed at 500, 125, and 60 g/hectare, with respect to the active glufosinate or fosmidomycin component. As can be seen from the data listed in Table 1, both 1a-4Glufos and 1a-4Fos salts of the cell-penetrating octaarginine peptide showed poor herbicidal activity. The glufosinate octaarginine salt was much weaker than glufosinate, and the fosmidomycin octaarginine salt was also much weaker than fosmidomycin (based on previous data[42]). Since it is known8 that oligo-arginines penetrate plant cells very much the same way as other eukaryotic cells, it is possible that the low activity of both 1a-4Glufos and 1a-4Fos is instead due to poor foliar uptake. This is consistent with reports that very hydrophilic compounds cross a plant cuticle through a polar pathway that has molecular size limitations, which are likely incompatible with these large CPP-salts.[44][45]

Table 1.

Screen of herbicidal activity of glufosinate ammonium salt and of the octaarginine salts 1a-4Glufos and 1a-4Fos on whole plants

Plant Species[a] [g/ha] Glufosinate NH4 Salt [%] 1a-4Glufos [%] 1a-4Fos [%]
AMAPA 500 100 50 40
125 100 20 10
  60 100   0   0
CHEAL 500 100 10 80
125   70 10 70
  60   40 10   0
EPHHL 500 100 30 60
125   70 10 30
  60   30   0   0
IPOHE 500 100 10 60
125   50 10 20
  60   30   0   0
SETFA 500 100   0 50
125 100   0 10
  60 100   0   0
ECHCG 500 100   0 30
125   90   0 10
  60   80   0   0
ELEIN 500 100 20 40
125 100   0 20
  60   80   0   0
DIGSA 500 100 60 80
125   90 10   3
  60   80   0   0
LOLPE 500   70   0 10
125   30   0 10
  60   20   0   0
[a]

AMAPA: Amaranthus palmeri, CHEAL: Chenopodium album, EPHHL: Euphorbia heterophylla, IPOHE: Ipomoea hederacea, SETFA: Setaria faberi, ECHCG: Echinochloa crus-galli, ELEIN: Eleusine indica, DIGSA: Digitaria sanguinalis, LOLPE: Lolium perenne. Three concentrations were used (500, 125, 60 [g/ha]); adjuvant 0.5% Tween 20; assessment 13 days after herbicide application, 0% meaning no effect, 100% meaning complete kill.

Thus, the in-vitro plant-cell[43] penetration of oligo-arginine derivatives could not be exploited for delivery into whole plants of the herbicides glufosinate and fosmidomycin. We speculate that the limited biological activity we observe, especially with 1a-4Fos, might be due to the foliar uptake of small amounts of the dissociated compounds (i.e. non CPP-salts).

In-vivo-Toxicity in Mice of the 4:1-Salts of Fosmidomycin with Octaarginines and of Other Oligo-Arginine Derivatives

In view of the observed lack of activity of the glufosinate and fosmidomycin salts 1a-4Glufos and 1a-4Fos in whole plants we worried about the activity of oligo-arginine derivatives in whole animals, i.e. their in-vivo activity. This appeared to be especially important because of recent reports about artemisinin resistance of P. falciparum,[46] which has caused a revival of interest in fosmidomycin as an anti-malarial drug; for an extensive review article about clinical trials see ref.[47] In order to find out whether the octaarginine salt 1a-4Fos is more active than fosmidomycin itself, as it is in vitro (vide supra), we have carried out in-vivo tests by intravenous tail-vein injection to Plasmodium-berghei-infected and to non-infected mice (P. berghei is a parasite that causes rodent malaria.9) There have been numerous in vivo studies involving oligo-arginines in drug delivery; for an extensive review we recommend an article by Zaro and Shen;[48]10 for two reports about acute toxicity of simple oligo-arginine derivatives determined by direct intravenous injection to mice we refer to papers by the groups of Tsien[55] and Zhang.[56]11 ,12

The results of our toxicity investigations of the fosmidomycin-octaarginine salts are collected in Table 2, which also contains some literature data, and, for comparison, parasitaemia-reduction values for the Na-salt of fosmidomycin. Clearly, all octaarginine salts are extremely toxic when administered intravenously, lethal down to 1.5 μmol/kg doses, and so are the previously reported oligo-arginine derivatives1a and 1b themselves; it looks as if the TFA salt 1a-9TFA of octaarginine is somewhat more toxic than peptide 1a without this counter-ion. There is no difference between the octa-l-, -d- and -β-arginine salts 1a-, ent-1a-, 2a-4Fos or between infected and non-infected mice. Thus, the in-vitro increase of fosmidomycin activity against P. falciparum when used as the salt 1a-4Fos cannot be confirmed in the in-vivo experiment with P. berghei. In contrast, the toxic activity of the salt turns out to be more or less identical to that of pure oligo-arginines 1. Apparently, fosmidomycin found other counter-cations and octaarginine other counter-anions after injection into the blood stream, inspite of the perfect anion-cation fit between the two components of the salts (cf. Figure 3,a). The systemic toxicity in intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of polycationic CPPs is supposed to be associated with mast-cell degranulation.[55]

Table 2.

In-vivo-Toxicity investigations with the octaarginine-fosmidomycin salts 1- and 2-4Fos by intravenous injection into the tail vein of mice non-infected or infected by P. berghei. For comparison, literature toxicity values of other oligo-arginines, 1 and 2, are also shown (their corresponding concentrations may have to be corrected to lower values6). Parasitaemia reductions by Na-fosmidomycin are also presented. Parasitaemia reductions < 20% must be considered non-significant in this investigation: ‘no parasitaemia reduction’. Administration cocktail 0.9% NaCl; volume administered: 0.01 ml/g mouse

Compound i.v. dose [μmol/kg] Observed effects
With Plasmodium berghei-infected mice
    Na-fosmidomycin 1.5·106 95% Parasitaemia reduction
   5·105 72% Parasitaemia reduction
1.5·104 No parasitaemia reduction
   5·103 No parasitaemia reduction
    1a-4Fos  50 Immediate exitus
   1.5 Exitus in 3 min
   0.5 No parasitaemia reduction, increased heart rate (HR), ataxia
    ent-1a-4Fos  50 Immediate exitus
   1.5 Exitus in 3 min
   0.5 No parasitaemia reduction, increased HR, ataxia
    2a-4Fos (β)  47 Immediate exitus
   1.4 Exitus in 3 min
   0.47 No parasitaemia reduction, no acute toxicity symptoms
With non-infected mice
    1a  79 Immediate exitus
   7.9 Increased HR, ataxia
    1a-9TFA  43.6 Immediate exitus
   4.4 Immediate exitus
    1b-8TFA  39.4 Immediate exitus
   4.0 Increased HR, ataxia
    1a-4Fos    5 Exitus in 3 min
   0.5 Increased HR, ataxia
    ent-1a-4Fos    5 Exitus in 3 min
   0.5 Increased HR, ataxia
Our previous work with rats
  2b (β)    0.7 No toxic effects[21][57]
Reports in the literature with mice
    ent-1b    5 Exitus within < 5 min[55]
   2.5 4/5 Survival[55]
    mixed-(L/D)-1a  20 Exitus in < 5 min[56]
10 and 5 Survival depends on ratio and position of l- and d-Arg[56]

Suitably Protected Adp-Building Blocks (46) and Peptide Assembly to the Octamers (710) Derived from the Biopolymer Cyanophycin

Discovery, Physiological Function, and Structure of Cyanophycin

The guanidinium-rich compounds (GRCs, Figure 1,a) consisting of arginine (1a in Figure 2) must be considered unnatural; to the best of our knowledge no oligo-arginine has been identified as part of a natural CPP system. There is, however, a peptidic biopolymer carrying an arginine side chain with a terminal guanidine group on each and every residue: cyanophycin (Figure 4), largely unknown among chemists, biochemists, and biologists. In view of our interest in GRCs we have followed the research of Alexander Steinbüchel and his group (University Münster) in the field of cyanophycin for years.[5864] This biopolymer has an intriguing structure: it is a poly-aspartic-acid N-argininylated on the carboxylic acid groups of the side chains (Figure 4). Cyanophycin was discovered as characteristic granules in blue-green algae by the Italian botanist Antonio Borzi in 1887 and chemically identified by R. D. Simon in 1971.[65] It is formed by cyanobacteria as a storage material for nitrogen and carbon under conditions of nutrient shortage; its molecular weight can be up to 130 kDa. Synthetases producing the polymer and cyanophycinases degrading it have been isolated and can be used for production of the polymer on technical scale. The building block of the polymer consisting of aspartic acid and arginin has been proposed as a di-aminoacid-nutrient additive; for leading papers on these subjects see the articles by the Steinbüchel group in refs.[5864] and publications cited therein. Herein we refer to the building block of the cyanophycin polymer as H-Adp-OH (Figure 4). Adp may be considered a dipeptide of Arg and Asp, in which the aspartic acid is incorporated as a β-amino-acid building block.[23]

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The biopolymer cyanophycin and the monomeric argininylated aspartic-acid derivative β-Asp-α-Arg-dipeptide (H-Adp-OH), from which the polymer is built. In the literature cyanophycin is commonly referred to as ‘cyanophycin granule polypeptide’ (CGP). The side chains of an Adp-oligomer contain pH-dependent charges (positive and negative charges on the N- and C-termini are not considered in this presentation).

Interestingly, the side chains on the peptide backbone of an Adp-oligomer can be cationic, zwitterionic, or anionic, depending on the pH (Figure 4). For cell-penetration the guanidinium groups with their positive charges must be considered mandatory. Under physiological conditions the zwitterionic form (without a net charge) should be present to some extent; this could lead to reduced interaction of the guanidinium groups with negatively charged entities on the cell surface, believed to be an important initial step for cell penetration4. On the other hand, if Adp-oligomers would turn out to have cell-penetrating properties, they could possibly play this role in nature – hitherto unnoticed.

Synthesized Adp-Derivatives 46 and Octamers 710

To find out whether oligo-Adp-derivatives, segments of the guanidinium-rich biopolymer cyanophycin, behave like common GRCs, we have synthesized octa-Adp with (79) and without (1012) N-terminal fluorescent FAM labels and with methyl ester (8, 11) and dimethylamide groups (9, 12) instead of COOH groups in the side chains (Figure 5).[66] The latter two compounds were chosen to probe a possible negative influence of zwitter-ion formation on cell-penetrating properties.13

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Synthesized building blocks 46 for solid-phase-peptide synthesis by the Fmoc-technology on Fmoc-Pal-PEG-PS resin. SPPS leads to the Adp-octamers 1012, and their FAM-derivatives 79. For the formula of the fluorescein-derivative FAM see Figure 2. For details of the syntheses see ref.[66]

All octa-Adp-derivatives were purified by preparative HPLC and identified by mass spectrometry. In this way 5 to15 mg quantities of the novel peptides were obtained. The lyophilized samples consist of TFA salts, which were treated with Amberlyst ion-exchange resin A-26 (OH form, pKa 12.13) for removal of the TFA counter-ions.14 If not otherwise stated, the samples thus obtained were used for the biological experiments described in the following section.

Determination of in-vivo-Toxicity and of in-vitro-Cell permeability of Adp8-Derivatives

In-vivo-Toxicity Measured by Intravenous Injection

The salt of Adp8 with four fosmidomycin counter-ions (10-4Fos), the octa-Adp (10), and its derivatives with ester (11) and amide groups (12) were tested for acute in-vivo toxicity as described above for the octaarginine derivatives (Table 2). Surprisingly, no obvious acute toxicity symptoms whatsoever were caused by the salt (10-4Fos) or octa-Adp (10), even at doses as high as 45 μmol/kg.15 On the other hand, the octapeptides 11 and 12 with methylester and dimethyl-amide groups, respectively, in the arginine side chains are toxic. At doses of ca. 30 μmol/kg both derivatives are lethal, just like the octaarginines (Table 2). Detailed results are summarized in Table 3. Thus, the free carboxylic-acid groups in the side chains of octa-Adp prevent toxicity.

Table 3.

In-vitro-Toxicity investigations with octa-Adp derivatives 1012. Intravenous injection into the tail vein of mice non-infected or infected by P. berghei. The parasitaemia reduction observed with 10-4Fos was below 20%. For the experiment with octa-Adp 10 TFA-free peptide was used; peptides 11 and 12 were employed as TFA salts (cf. footnote 6 above). For comparison with octaarginine derivatives, for abbreviations, and for experimental details see Table 2

Compound i.v. dose [μmol/kg] Observed effects
With Plasmodium berghei-infected mice
  10-4Fos   1.10 No parasitaemia reduction
  0.34 No parasitaemia reduction
  10 45 No parasitaemia reduction, no acute toxicity symptoms
  9 No parasitaemia reduction, no acute toxicity symptoms
  4.5 No parasitaemia reduction, no acute toxicity symptoms
With non-infected mice
  11-9TFA 30.1 Immediate exitus
  3.0 Increased HR, ataxia
  12-9TFA 29.1 Immediate exitus
  2.9 Increased HR, ataxia

Cell-Penetrating Properties of Adp-Derivatives 79 Studied by Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy (CFM)

At this point of our investigation the questions arose whether non-toxic Adp-derivatives with free carboxylic acid groups in the side chains have cell-penetrating properties and how they might differ in this respect from the compounds with ester and amide groups in the oligomer side chains. As candidates for cell-penetration studies we used the FAM-labeled octa-Adp-derivatives 7 (with free carboxylic acid groups) and 8 and 9 (with ester and amide groups, respectively).

To evaluate cell permeability, we monitored the permeation efficiency of the FAM-labeled peptides into HEK293 and MCF-7 cells by CFM. The fluorescent lipophilic membrane stain R18 was used to mark the plasma membranes of the cells.16 The results are illustrated in Figure 6: i) FAM-Adp8-NH2 (7) does not enter the cells at all. ii) In contrast, the FAM-(Adp(OMe))8-NH2 (8) and FAM-(Adp(NMe2))8-NH2 (9) derivatives exhibited mediocre to high cell permeability and yielded homogeneous cell loading accompanied by higher concentrations in the nuclear region.17

Figure 6.

Figure 6

CFM Images for determining penetration into HEK293 and MCF-7 cells by the octa-Adp-derivatives 79. Yellow fluorescence: R18-marked cell walls; green fluorescence: FAM-labeled octa-Adp-derivatives. Clearly, compound 7 with free carboxlic-acid groups in the peptide side-chains does not enter the cells. For details see ref. [67]

Thus, the FAM-labeled octamer 7 of the non-toxic cyanophycin-derived peptide 10 (cf. Table 3), with free carboxylic-acid groups in the arginine side chains of the Adp residues, turns out to have no cell-penetrating properties, while its toxic derivatives possessing ester and amide groups (8 and 9) are cell permeable and behave like conventional octaarginine CPPs such as 1b.[20]

A simple interpretation of this result would be that there are no ‘free’ guanidinium groups on the backbone of peptides 7 and 10 under the physiological conditions (pH 7.4) of our experiment (cf. introduction and Figure 1). Rather than the cationic or zwitter ionic structures discussed above (see Figure 4) there could be a structure containing intramolecular salt moieties consisting of guanidinium cations and carboxylate anions. An example is shown in Figure 7,a, where the carboxylate group of Adp residue n forms an anion-cation complex with the guanidinium group of Adp residue n + 2. In such a structure the peptide backbone does not adopt an extended conformation that can present the attached side chains carrying guanidinium groups to enable interaction with cell surfaces. This intramolecular salt formation calls to mind the large decrease in cell-penetration observed for the peptides containing equal numbers of Arg and Glu residues shown in Figure 7,b,[68] as compared to their counterparts containing only Arg residues. Also, the so-called activatable cell-penetrating peptides (ACPPs) shown schematically in Figure 7,c[55][6973] are not cell-penetrating by themselves, but contain a predetermined specific cleavage site, such as chemically (S–S bonds), photochemically or enzymatically labile entities, that are cleaved in the extracellular space, releasing cell-penetrating polycationic oligo-arginine derivatives with their cargo. A previously proposed example of guanidinium neutralization in an oligo-arginine by the phosphate dianion (HPO42) is shown in Figure 7,d; similar intermolecular salt-bridge formation with the phosphate-ester groups of membrane phospholipids has been suggested to facilitate transport through the membrane.[74]

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Cation-anion interactions in oligoarginine derivatives. a) Possible salt-type structures in oligo-Adp chains derived from cyanophycin. b) Poor surface binding and cell uptake of neutral mixed Arg-Glu tetradeca-peptides as compared to poly-cationic analogs. c) ‘Internally neutralized’ polyelectrolytes, in which the anionic and cationic charges may be represented by the carboxylate and guanidinium groups in the side chains of Glu and Arg, respectively. d) Guanidinium neutralization by phosphate groups proposed in a discussion of the influence of counter-anions on cell and membrane permeability of oligo-arginines.[74]

Another conclusion from these results must be that the in-vivo toxicity observed with octaarginines and with the octa-Adp-ester and -amide derivatives is due to their poly-cationic structures.

NMR-Spectra of the Octa-Adp-Derivatives

If the Adp octamer with free carboxylic-acid groups would form intramolecular salt complexes, as indicated in Figure 7, a, we expected that its different backbone structure should give rise to a markedly different NMR spectrum in comparison with the spectra of the ester and amide derivatives. Thus, we measured the NMR spectra in water of the three octa-Adp-derivatives 10-9TFA, 11-9TFA, and 12-9TFA, as obtained by preparative HPLC purification (using TFA-containing eluent) followed by lyophilization (cf. footnotes 6 and 14). The three spectra presented in Figure 8 are so similar that no evidence for a different backbone structure of octa-Adp 10 with its free carboxylic-acid groups can possibly be derived. This is actually not surprising, if we consider that formation of an intramolecular salt between the guanidinium and the carboxylate group would be energetically unfavorable for the triflate salt 10-9TFA (see the accompanying Equation 1 and the pH-dependent structures of oligo-Adp shown in Figure 4). We are now in the process of synthesizing larger amounts of the octamer 10 to be able to measure its NMR spectra in the presence of different counterions in aqueous solutions at various pH values; the results of these investigations will be reported in due course.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

1H-NMR Spectra of the TFA salts of octa-Adp (10, a section of cyanophycin, recorded at 500 MHz) and of its methylester and dimethyl amide derivatives (11,12, recorded at 600 MHz) in H2O/D2O 95:5 at 25 °C. NMR Samples were prepared by dissolving 10.5 mg of 10, 8.7 mg of 11, and 7 mg of 12, respectively, in 600 μl of the solvent mixture. Water suppression was achieved using excitation sculpting. Assignments indicated in the figure are based on DQF-COSY, TOCSY, 13C-HSQC, 15N-HSQC and ROESY, all recorded at 600 MHz. Tentative residue specific assignments of selected protons are indicated in parentheses. Proton resonances close to the position of the water signal are also suppressed or strongly attenuated.

graphic file with name emss-82029-f009.jpg

Conclusion and Outlook

We have shown that the antiparasitic and herbicidal activities of fosmidomycin (a phosphonic acid) and of glufosinate (a phosphinic acid) are not increased when their salts with cell-penetrating octaarginines are administered in vivo, and we have demonstrated that intravenous injection of various octaarginine derivatives into the tail veins of mice is extremely toxic. These results contrast with those of in-vitro studies.

In search for new types of arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides with improved properties we have synthesized for the first time and investigated an octamer segment [H–Adp8–NH2] of the biopolymer cyanophycin. This novel oligopeptide possessing arginines as side chains turns out to be neither toxic nor cell-penetrating. If, on the other hand, the COOH groups in the argininylated side chains of H–Adp8–NH2 are replaced by ester or amide groups, both the toxicity and the cell permeability, typical of oligoarginines, are restored. NMR spectra of the three triflate salts provide no evidence for different backbone structures of the octamer with COOH, as compared to the analogs with COOMe and CONMe2 groups.

Future investigations of the cyanophycin-derived peptides will have to address, inter alia, the question of whether a possible intracellular enzymatic ester hydrolysis of the cell-penetrating compound H–(Adp(OMe))8–NH2, converting it into the non-cell-penetrating compound H–Adp8–NH2, could lead to unexpected effects in CPP applications. Furthermore, the toxicity of H–(Adp(OMe))8–NH2 might be reduced, and its cell-permeability modulated by having ester groups in the side chains only at certain positions of the peptide chain (‘mixed’ Adp/Adp-ester oligomers). Another aspect in connection with the use of olig-Adp derivatives for CPP investigations is their enzymatic degradation. Oligo-l-arginines are degraded rapidly; the half-life of the octamer in human plasma is 0.5 min, oligo-d-arginines are much more stable under these conditions[20] and are therefore the commonly preferred enantiomers in CPP studies (rn instead of Rn). It will be important to determine the half-lifes of the cell-penetrating octa-Adp derivatives with ester and amide groups in the side chains.18

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Syngenta for carrying out the herbicide testing and for allowing us to show the results presented in Table 1. Financial supports from the European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant No. 681587) to P. S. D. and from the NCCR Molecular Systems Engineering to P. S. D. and C. S. are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

2

For a critical article about oligo-nucleotide cell delivery by CPPs with historical background, see a short review (expert opinion) in ref.[12] The well-considered comments about drug delivery, recently published by J.-C. Leroux, may be especially applicable to the field of cell penetration.[13] For those who are able to read German we recommend the recent review by O. Avrutina, H. Kolmar, and M. Empting.[14]

3

For a comprehensive review article covering the literature on β-peptides up to 2004 see ref.[23] For a seminal full paper about preparation and properties of oligo-β-arginines see ref.[17] For independent work on this subject by the Gellman group see ref.[25] and earlier contributions cited therein.

4

Interaction with the negatively charged surfaces of the vesicles is, of course, related to the mechanism of cell penetration: in non-endosomal mechanisms the oligoarginines first make contact with negatively charged phospholipids and glycans, such as heparin, on the cell surface (cf. Figure 3,a, below), before entering the cell, a process, which depends on the membrane potential across the cell wall maintained by ion pumps.[27] The composition of the cell surface changes when the cells are infected (cf. erythrocytes[19]) or when they are in an apoptotic state (cf. HEK293 cells[20]).

5

For delivery of an inositol pyrophosphate derivative by a guanidinium-rich transporter (with a polycarbonate backbone) into the cytoplasm of HeLa cells see ref.[29]

6

It is important at this point to comment on the preparation of salts, like 1a-4Fos and 1a-4Glufos, and the concentrations of oligo-arginines used/administered herein and in reports of other groups. When preparing and purifying the oligo-arginines in the usual way, i.e. by Fmoc-technology and HPLC purification with trifluoro-acetic-acid (TFA)-containing solvent mixtures, an octaarginine amide, for instance, is isolated as the nona-triflate salt 1a-9TFA (see Figure 2), thus containing ca. 45 wt-% of TFA. A sample purchased from one of the companies offering peptide-synthesis services consists of almost 50% TFA. We have confirmed this by elemental analyses of the F-content of various lyophilized samples. In the work described herein and in ref.[37] the oligo-arginine TFA-salts were treated with Amberlyst ion-exchange resin A-26 (OH form, pKa 12.13) to remove TFA before use, so the reported concentrations refer to free oligo-arginines, if not stated otherwise. Since other authors in the field (vide infra) do not mention corrections or precautions along these lines we have to suspect that the oligo-arginine concentrations given in their papers may actually be too high. The only paper we are aware of, in which CF3CO2 counterions of GRCs are explicitly shown with the molecular formulae, is the publication by Wender et al. in ref.[2].

7

For preparing the 4:1-salts with oligo-arginines (Figure 3, b), the commercial fosmidomycin Na-salt and the glufosinate NH4-salt were converted to the free acids by treatment with the ion-exchange resin IR-120 (pKa 2.2) (cf. footnotes 6 and 14).

8

See for instance, an article in which nonaarginine (R9) was reported to carry a disulfide-attached protein into live plant cells.[43]

9

For in vitro tests with octaarginines and various P. berghei-infected human cell lines, see ref.[37]

10

For ‘life-cell’ toxicities (cytotoxicities) of 1 and ent-1 with n = 9 and 10, see ref.[49][50] For review articles with references to in-vivo tests with GRCs, including intravenous injections, see also ref.[5153] Leucocyte toxicity of a taxol-octaarginine conjugate.[54]

11

In the work by Zhang et al.[56] diastereomeric octaarginines consisting of l- and d-arginine moieties (called ‘chimera’) were tested, and it turned out that the toxicities differed substantially, depending on the number and position of d-entities in the chain of l-arginines. In independent work by our group[20] such ‘mixed’ octaarginine derivatives were found to have varying rates of cell penetration (up to a factor of 4) and varying stabilities in heparin-stabilized human plasma (from 5 min to > 7 days), depending upon the site and frequency of d/l-replacements in the octaarginine chain.

12

For a non-toxic dosis administered i.v. to rats see 2b in Table 2 and ref.[21] For application of nm doses to mice see ref.[57]

13

Interestingly, an Arg-methylester as in 8 was chosen by Matile et al.[9][10] to render poly(disulfide)s cell permeable.

14

Elemental analysis of lyophilized H-Adp8-NH2 (10) showed that the sample had an F-content of 14.7%, a value that is calculated for [H-Adp8-NH2 · 8 CF3CO2H] (cf. footnote 6, above).

15

The observation that the Adp-octamer 10 has no i.v.-toxicity matches well with the fact that the ‘monomer’ H-Adp-OH itself is being considered as a dipeptidic nutrient additive (vide supra), which means that it does not exhibit any p.o.-toxicity. See publications cited in ref.[5863], especially those coauthored by A. Sallam; type in Google: ‘Zwei Aminosäuren als Geschäftsidee. Mit Cyanobakterien den Körper stäken’, https://www.n-tv.de/wissen.[63][64] See also: Cysal GmbH, Technologiehof Münster, Mendelstrasse 11, D-48149 Münster, Germany; http://www.cysal.de,[64] and footnote 18 below.

16

In a previous investigation of octaarginine derivatives we employed the membrane-localization dye DiI.[20]

17

Full experimental details and a quantitative analysis of the cell permeation considering the role of DMSO and of the membrane dye R18 is published in a separate paper.[67]

18

The dipeptide H-Adp-OH together with another dipeptide (β-Asp-Lys) (degraded cyanophycin) have been reported to be absorbed by Caco2-cells, to be degraded by mammalian, avian and fish-gut flora, to be useful as feed or feed additive for culturing aquatic animals, or as component of cosmetics. These results have been described in patents by A. Sallam and A. Steinbüchel of the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität[75] and by A. Sallam, M. Krehenbrink, and D. Kalkandzhiev of CYSAL GmbH in Münster.[7678]

Author Contribution Statement

All syntheses were carried out by M. G. The other experiments were performed by F. K. (Fluorescence Microscopy), S. W. (determination of toxicity), M.-O. E. (NMR investigation). D. H., P. S. D., F. K., M. R., C. S., P. M., and A. K. B. helped supervise the project and/or contributed to the final version of the manuscript. The research was conceived by D. S. who also wrote the manuscript.

References

  • [1].Geihe Stanzl E, Trantow BM, Vargas JR, Wender PA. Fifteen Years of Cell-Penetrating, Guanidinium-Rich Molecular Transporters: Basic Science, Research Tools, and Clinical Applications. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:2944–2954. doi: 10.1021/ar4000554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].McKinlay CJ, Waymouth RM, Wender PA. Cell-Penetrating, Guanidinium-Rich Oligophosphoesters: Effective and Versatile Molecular Transporters for Drug and Probe Delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:3510–3517. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Futaki S, Suzuki T, Ohashi W, Yagami T, Tanaka S, Ueda K, Sugiura Y. Arginine-rich peptides: An abundant source of membrane-permeable peptides having potential as carriers for intracellular protein delivery. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:5836–5840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007540200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Futaki S, editor. Membrane Permeable Peptide Vectors: Chemistry and Functional Design for the Therapeutic Applications. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2008;60(4 – 5):447–614. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.11.001. themed issue. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Futaki S, Nakase I. Cell-Surface Interactions on Arginine-Rich Cell-Penetrating Peptides Allow for Multiplex Modes of Internalization. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:2449–2456. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Langel Ü, editor. Handbook of Cell-Penetrating Peptides. 2nd. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Boca Raton; FL, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Copolovici DM, Langel K, Eriste E, Langel Ü. Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Design, Synthesis, and Applications. ACS Nano. 2014;8:1972–1994. doi: 10.1021/nn4057269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Nagel YA, Raschle PS, Wennemers H. Effect of Preorganized Charge-Display on the Cell-Penetrating Properties of Cationic Peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:122–126. doi: 10.1002/anie.201607649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Gasparini G, Matile S. Protein delivery with cell-penetrating poly(disulfide)s. Chem Commun. 2015;51:17160–17162. doi: 10.1039/c5cc07460f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Morelli P, Bartolami E, Sakai N, Matile S. Glycosylated Cell-Penetrating Poly(disulfide)s: Multifunctional Cellular Uptake at High Solubility. Helv Chim Acta. 2018;101:e1700266. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Guidotti G, Brambilla L, Rossi D. Cell-Penetrating Peptides: From Basic Research to Clinics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38:406–424. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Lee SH, Castagner B, Leroux J-C. Is there a future for cell-penetrating peptides in oligonucleotide delivery? Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;85:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Leroux J-C. Drug Delivery: Too Much Complexity, Not Enough Reproducibility? Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:15170–15171. doi: 10.1002/anie.201709002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Avrutina O, Kolmar H, Empting M. Trendbericht Biochemie 2017: Zellpenetration. Nachr Chem. 2018;66:294–298. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Fernández-Carneado J, Van Gool M, Martos V, Castel S, Prados P, de Mendoza J, Giralt E. Highly Efficient, Non-peptidic Oligoguanidinium Vectors that Selectively Internalize into Mitochondria. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:869–874. doi: 10.1021/ja044006q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Rueping M, Mahajan Y, Sauer M, Seebach D. Cellular Uptake Studies with β-Peptides. ChemBioChem. 2002;3:257–259. doi: 10.1002/1439-7633(20020301)3:2/3<257::AID-CBIC257>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Seebach D, Namoto K, Mahajan YR, Bindschädler P, Sustmann R, Kirsch M, Ryder NS, Weiss M, Sauer M, Roth C, Werner S, et al. Chemical and Biological Investigations of β-Oligoarginines. Chem Biodiversity. 2004;1:65–97. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200490014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Geueke B, Namoto K, Agarkova I, Perriard J-C, Kohler H-P, Seebach D. Bacterial Cell Penetration by β3-Oligohomoarginins: Indication for Passive Transfer through the Lipid Bilayer. ChemBioChem. 2005;6:982–985. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200400394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Kamena F, Monnanda B, Makou D, Capone S, Patora-Komisarska K, Seebach D. On the Mechanism of Eukaryotic Cell Penetration by α- and β-Oligoarginines – Targeting Infected Erythrocytes. Chem Biodiversity. 2011;8:1–12. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201000318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Purkayastha N, Eyer K, Robinson T, Dittrich PS, Beck AK, Seebach D, Kolesinska B, Cadalbert R. Enantiomeric and Diastereoisomeric (Mixed) l/d-Octaarginine Derivatives – A Simple Way of Modulating the Properties of Cell-Penetrating Peptides. Chem Biodiversity. 2013;10:1165–1184. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201300180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Weiss HM, Wirz B, Schweitzer A, Amstutz R, Rodriguez Perez MI, Andres H, Metz Y, Gardiner J, Seebach D. ADME Investigations of Unnatural Peptides: Distribution of a 14C-Labeled β3-Octaarginine in Rats. Chem Biodiversity. 2007;4:1413–1437. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200790121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Purkayastha N, Capone S, Beck AK, Seebach D, Leeds J, Thompson K, Moser HE. Antibacterial Activity of Enrofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin Derivatives of β-Octaarginine. Chem Biodiversity. 2015;12:179–193. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201400456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Seebach D, Beck AK, Bierbaum DJ. The World of β- and γ-Peptides Comprised of Homologated Proteinogenic Amino Acids and Other Components. Chem Biodiversity. 2004;1:1111–1239. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200490087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Hitz T, Iten R, Gardiner J, Namoto K, Walde P, Seebach D. Interaction of α- and β-Oligoarginine-Acids and Amides with Anionic Lipid Vesicles: A Mechanistic and Termodynamic Study. Biochemistry. 2006;45:5817–5829. doi: 10.1021/bi060285d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Potocky TB, Silvius J, Menon AK, Gellman SH. HeLa Cell Entry by Guanidinium-Rich β-Peptides: Importance of Specific Cation–Cell Surface Interactions. ChemBioChem. 2007;8:917–926. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Rothbard JB, Garlington S, Lin Q, Kirschberg T, Kreider E, McGrane PL, Wender PA, Khavari PA. Conjugation of arginine oligomers to cyclosporin A facilitates topical delivery and inhibition of inflammation. Nat Med. 2000;6:1253–1257. doi: 10.1038/81359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Rothbard JB, Jessop TC, Lewis RS, Murray BA, Wender PA. Role of Membrane Potential and Hydrogen Bonding in the Mechanism of Translocation of Guanidinium-Rich Peptides into Cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:9506–9507. doi: 10.1021/ja0482536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Montenegro J, Gehin C, Bang E-K, Fin A, Doval DA, Riezman H, Sakai N, Matile S. Conceptually New Entries into Cells. Chimia. 2011;65:853–858. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2011.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Pavlovic I, Thakor DT, Vargas JR, McKinlay CJ, Hauke S, Anstaett P, Camuña RC, Bigler L, Gasser G, Schultz C, Wender PA, Jessen HJ. Cellular delivery and photochemical release of a caged inositol-pyrophosphate induces PH-domain translocation in cellulo . Nat Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10622. 10622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Schmidtchen FP, Berger M. Artificial Organic Host Molecules for Anions. Chem Rev. 1997;97:1609–1646. doi: 10.1021/cr9603845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Selig P. Guanidine Organocatalysis. Synthesis. 2013;45:703–718. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Heinzer F, Soukup M, Eschenmoser A. Über 3,3,6,9,9-Pentamethyl-2,10-diaza-bicyclo[4.4.0]-1-decen und einige seiner Derivate. Über synthetische Methoden. 13. Mitteilung. Helv Chim Acta. 1978;61:2851–2874. [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Sternbach D, Jaisli F, Bonetti M, Eschenmoser A, Shibuya M. A Fragmentational Approach to Macrolides: (5-E, 8-Z)-6-methyl-5,8-undecadien-11-olide. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1979;18:634–636. [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Boyle PH, Convery MA, Davis AP, Hosken GD, Murray BA. Deprotonation of Nitroalkanes by Bicyclic Amidine and Guanidine Bases; Evidence for Molecular Recognition within a Catalytic Cycle for C–C Bond Formation. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1992:239–242. [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Seebach D, Beck AK, Studer A. Some Effects of Lithium Salts, of Strong Bases, and of the Cosolvent DMPU in Peptide Chemistry, and Elsewhere. In: Ernst B, Leumann C, editors. Modern Synthetic Methods 1995. Vol. 7. Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Basel/VCH Weinheim; 1995. pp. 1–178. Chapter I.5. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Seebach D, Beck AK, Badine DM, Limbach M, Eschenmoser A, Treasurywala AM, Hobi R, Prikoszovich W, Linder B. Are Oxazolidinones Really Unproductive, Parasitic Species in Proline Catalysis? – Thoughts and Experiments Pointing to an Alternative View. Helv Chim Acta. 2007;90:425–471. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Sparr C, Purkayastha N, Kolesinska B, Gengenbacher M, Amulic B, Matuschewski K, Seebach D, Kamena F. Improved Efficacy of Fosmidomycin against Plasmodium and Mycobacterium Species by Combination with the Cell-Penetrating Peptide Octaarginine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:4689–4698. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00427-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Iguchi E, Okuhara M, Kohsaka M, Aoki H, Imanaka H. Studies on new phosphonic acid antibiotics. II. Taxonomic studies on producing organisms of the phosphonic acid and related compounds. J Antibiot. 1980;33:18–23. and literature cited therein. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Bayer E, Gugel KH, Hägele K, Hagenmaier H, Jessipow S, König WA, Zähner H. Stoffwechselprodukte von Mikroorganismen. Phosphinothricin und Phosphinothricyl-Alanyl-Alanin. Helv Chim Acta. 1972;55:224–239. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19720550126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Donn G, Köcher H. Inhibitors of Glutamine Synthetase. In: Böger P, Wakabayashi K, Hirai K, editors. Herbicide Classes in Development – Mode of Action, Targets, Genetic Engineering, Chemistry. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg; 2002. pp. 87–101. Chapt. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Jalaludin A, Yu Q, Zoellner P, Beffa R, Powles S. Characterisation of glufosinate resistance mechanisms in Eleusine indica. Pest Manage Sci. 2017;73:1091–1100. doi: 10.1002/ps.4528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Scutt James. Syngenta Crop Protection, personal communication [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Bilichak A, Luu J, Eudes F. Intracellular delivery of fluorescent protein into viable wheat microspores using cationic peptides. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:666. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00666. and references cited therein. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Popp C, Burghardt M, Friedmann A, Riederer M. Characterisation of hydrophilic and lipophilic pathways of Hedera helix L. cuticular membranes: permeation of water and uncharged organic compounds. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:2797–2806. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Arand K, Stock D, Burghardt M, Riederer M. pH-Dependent permeation of amino acids through isolated ivy cuticles is affected by cuticular water sorption and hydration shell size of the solute. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:3865–3873. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Anderson JM, Mao S, Sam B, Sopha C, et al. Spread of Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:411–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Fernandes JF, Lell B, Agnandji ST, Obiang RM, Bassat Q, Kremsner PG, Mordmüller B, Grobusch MP. Fosmidomycin as an antimalarial drug: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:1375–1390. doi: 10.2217/FMB.15.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Zaro JL, Shen W-C. Cationic and amphipathic cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs): Their structures and in vivo studies in drug delivery. Front Chem Sci Eng. 2015;9:407–427. [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Tünnemann G, Ter-Avetisyan G, Martin RM, Stöckl M, Herrmann A, Cardoso MC. Live-cell analysis of cell penetration ability and toxicity of oligo-arginines. J Pept Sci. 2008;14:469–476. doi: 10.1002/psc.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Tünnemann G. Dissertation, Fakultät für Biologie. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität; München: 2009. Toxicity, uptake and applications of intracellular delivery by cell penetrating peptides. [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Verdurmen WPR, Brock R. Biological responses towards cationic peptides and drug carriers. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011;32:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Dinca A, Chien W-M, Chin MT. Intracellular Delivery of Proteins with Cell-Penetrating Peptides for Therapeutic Uses in Human Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:263. doi: 10.3390/ijms17020263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Järver P, Mäger I, Langel Ü. In vivo biodistribution and efficacy of peptide mediated delivery. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:528–535. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Wender PA, Galliher WC, Bhat NM, Pillow TH, Bieber MM, Teng NNH. Taxol-oligoarginine conjugates overcome drug resistance in-vitro in human ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Aguilera TA, Olson ES, Timmers MM, Jiang T, Tsien RY. Systemic in vivo distribution of activatable cell penetrating peptides is superior to that of cell penetrating peptides. Integr Biol. 2009;1:371–381. doi: 10.1039/b904878b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Ma Y, Gong C, Ma Y, Fan F, Luo M, Yang F, Zhang Y-H. Direct cytosolic delivery of cargoes in vivo by a chimera consisting of D- and L-arginine residues. J Controlled Release. 2012;162:286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Hsieh J-T, Zhou J, Gore C, Zimmern P. R11, a novel cell-permeable peptide, as an intravesical delivery vehicle. BJU Int. 2011;108:1666–1671. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Frommeyer M, Wiefel L, Steinbüchel A. Features of the biotechnologically relevant polyamide family “cyanophycins” and their biosynthesis in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:153–164. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.946467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Wiefel L, Steinbüchel A. Enzymatic Modification of Soluble Cyanophycin Using the Type II Peptidyl Arginine Deiminase from Oryctolagus cunuculus. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16:1064–1071. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201500433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Krehenbrink M, Sallam A, Steinbüchel A. Biotechnological Approaches to Dipeptide Production. In: Grunwald P, editor. Industrial Biocatalysis. Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd.,; 2015. pp. 863–886. Chapt. 23. [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Sallam A, Kast A, Przybilla S, Meiswinkel T, Steinbüchel A. Biotechnological Process for Production of β-Dipeptides from Cyanophycin on a Technical Scale and Its Optimization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:29–38. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01344-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Lockau W, Ziegler K. Cyanophycin Inclusions: Biosynthesis and Applications. In: Rehm B, editor. Microbial Bionanotechnology – Biological Self-assembly Systems and Biopolymer-based Nanostructures. Horizon Bioscience; Wymondham, Norfolk, U.K: 2006. pp. 78–106. Chapt. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Zwei Aminosäuren als Geschäftsidee. Mit Cyanobakterien den Körper stärken. https://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Mit-Cyanobakterien-den-Koerper-staerken-article661511.html
  • [64].Cysal GmbH. Technologiehof Münster, Mendelstrasse, 11, D-48149 Münster. Germany: http://www.cysal.de. [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Simon RD. Cyanophycin Granules from the Blue-Green Alga Anabaena cylindrica: A Reserve Material Consisting of Copolymers of Aspartic Acid and Arginine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;68:265–267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.2.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Grogg M, Hilvert D, Beck AK, Seebach D. Syntheses of Cyanophycin Segments for Investigations of Cell-Penetration. Synthesis. 2018;50 doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1610202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Kurth F, Dittrich PS, Walde P, Seebach D. Influence of the Membrane Dye R18 and of DMSO on Cell Penetration of Guanidinium-Rich Peptides. Chem Biodiversity. 2018;15:e1800302. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201800302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Fei L, Ren L, Zaro JL, Shen W-C. The influence of net charge and charge distribution on cellular uptake and cytosolic localization of arginine-rich peptides. J Drug Target. 2011;19:675–680. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2010.531729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Jiang T, Olson ES, Nguyen QT, Roy M, Jennings PA, Tsien RY. Tumor imaging by means of proteolytic activation of cell-penetrating peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:17867–17872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408191101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Goun EA, Shinde R, Dehnert KW, Adams-Bond A, Wender PA, Contag CH, Franc BL. Intracellular Cargo Delivery by an Octaarginine Transporter Adapted to Target Prostate Cancer Cells through Cell Surface Protease Activation. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;17:787–796. doi: 10.1021/bc0503216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Huang Y, Jiang Y, Wang H, Wang J, Shin MC, Byun Y, He H, Liang Y, Yang VC. Curb challenges of the “Trojan Horse” approach: Smart strategies in achieving effective yet safe cell-penetrating peptide-based drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:1299–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Qian Z, Xu X, Amacher JF, Madden DR, Cormet-Boyaka E, Pei D. Intracellular Delivery of Peptidyl Ligands by Reversible Cyclization: Discovery of a PDZ Domain Inhibitor that Rescues CFTR Activity. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:5874–5878. doi: 10.1002/anie.201411594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Ye J, Liu E, Yu Z, Pei X, Chen S, Zhang P, Shin M-C, Gong J, He H, Yang VC. CPP-Assisted Intracellular Drug Delivery, What is Next? Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1892. doi: 10.3390/ijms17111892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Nishihara M, Perret F, Takeuchi T, Futaki S, Lazar AN, Coleman AW, Sakai N, Matile S. Arginine magic with new counterions up the sleeve. Org Biomol Chem. 2005;3:1659–1669. doi: 10.1039/b501472g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Sallam A, Steinbüchel A. Biotechnological production of cyanophycin. US 8,980,845 B2, US 9,877,996 B2
  • [76].Sallam A, Krehenbrink M, Kalkandzhiev D. Aspartyl-Dipeptides for Aquaculture. WO 2017/068149 A1
  • [77].Sallam A, Krehenbrink M, Kalkandzhiev D. Aspartyl-Dipeptides for Skin Care and Cosmetic Use. WO 2017/162879 A1
  • [78].Sallam A, Krehenbrink M. Cyanophycin for slow Feeding Aquatic Organisms. WO 2017/174398 A1

RESOURCES