Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019 Jan 17;10(3):1801–1812. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00703

Polyester nanoparticle encapsulation mitigates paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy

R Ganugula 1, M Deng 2, M Arora 1, H-L Pan 2, M N V Ravi Kumar 1,*
PMCID: PMC6426664  NIHMSID: NIHMS1005330  PMID: 30609902

Abstract

Chemotherapy utilizing cytotoxic drugs, such as paclitaxel (PTX), is still a commonly used therapeutic approach to treat both localized and metastasized cancers. Unlike traditional regimens in which PTX is administered at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), alternative regimen like metronomic dosing (MET) are beneficial by administering PTX more frequently and in much lower doses exploiting anti-angiogenic and immunomodulatory effects. However, PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN) and lack of patient compliant dosage forms of PTX are major roadblocks for the successful implementation of metronomic regimens. Because of the success of polyester nanoparticle drug delivery, we explored the potential of nanoparticle-encapsulated paclitaxel (nPTX) in alleviating PIPN using a rat model. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with 2 mg/kg body weight of PTX or nPTX on four alternate days and PIPN was characterized using behavioral assessments, histology and immunohistochemistry. The reduction in the tactile and nociceptive pressure thresholds was significantly less in nPTX-treated rats than in PTX-treated rats over a 16-day study period. Histological analysis showed that the degree of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) degeneration and reduction in motor neurons in the spinal cord was significantly lower in the nPTX group than the PTX group. Further, immunofluorescence data reveals that nPTX-treated rats had an increased density of a neuronal marker, β-tubulin-III (TUBB3), reduced TUNEL positive cells and increased high molecular weight neurofilament (NFH) in the spinal cord, DRG and sciatic nerves compared with PTX-treated rats. Therefore, this work has important implications in improving risk-benefit profile of PTX, paving way for metronomic regimens.

Keywords: Dorsal root ganglion, motor neurons, nanoparticles, necrosis, paclitaxel, neuropathic pain, sustained release

Abstract Graphic

graphic file with name nihms-1005330-f0001.jpg

Introduction

The use of cytotoxic drugs for direct killing of cancer cells has dominated the field of oncology1,2. Taxanes form an important class of cytotoxic agents used in the treatment of a wide range of cancers35. Taxanes are known to block cell cycle progression through centrosome impairment, induction of abnormal spindles and suppression of spindle microtubule dynamics leading to apoptosis610. Generally, taxanes are administered to toxic levels reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), where benefits are expected to outweigh the side effects11. Recently, taxanes in combination with biologic agents are considered to broaden the range of treatment options to delay disease progression for as long as possible12,13. One of the major limitations of using microtubule-targeted agents such as taxanes is the high rate of peripheral neuropathy induced by these compounds14,15. Improved versions of paclitaxel (PTX) such as nab-Paclitaxel (Abraxane®), a protein bound PTX has overcome the peripheral neuropathy partially, compared to conventional solvent-based PTX16. Approaches such as the use of probiotics to counteract chemotherapy-induced neuropathy are being explored17. However, such approaches need to be evaluated in cancer models ensuring the combination does not compromise the efficacy18. On the other hand, there are currently no efficacious treatments in preventing PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN), including those that are traditionally used in treating neuropathic pain19. Very recently, a phase IIA trial of acupuncture was shown to be safe and effective in reducing the incidence of PIPN, although, further investigations are needed to establish definitive efficacy of such approaches20. In another recent clinical study with 40 breast cancer patients, cryotherapy, where patients wore frozen gloves and socks for 90 minutes that showed promising results in preventing PIPN21. Successful attempts were being made in developing novel non-invasive pain modifying techniques such as “Scrambler Therapy” that is aimed at re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways by utilizing transcutaneous electrical stimulation of pain fibers22. Clinical studies are also focused on establishing the correlation of plasma concentration and PIPN in patients receiving weekly PTX for breast cancer23, with a view to establish better dose-regimens. There is a significant body of preclinical work attempting to understand the mechanisms of PIPN and using this as a model to discover drugs for treating pain2433. Since taxanes are neither specific nor targeted to the cancer cells, significant research has focused on improved delivery of these drugs to tumor tissues with limited success34. Significant efforts are in place to develop next generation PTX formulations in the form of targeted nanoparticles that are aimed at delivering drugs directly to the tumor cells3538. While there is not much clinical success with targeted delivery of cytotoxic drugs aided by nanoparticles, some degree of success is reported for polymer micelles loaded with PTX (Genexol-PM) with an objective to increase MTD compared to conventional PTX3941. However, there are ample reports suggesting that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) responds to MTD chemotherapy and regulate tumor initiating cells (TIC) that are intrinsically more resistant to therapy4244.

Recently, metronomic chemotherapy (MET) regimens with anticancer agents is gaining significant interest for their antiangiogenic property and the potential to overcome resistance42,4547. Most importantly MET regimens prevent therapy-induced stromal activation and induction of TICs42. In particular, MET regimens are highly successful in the clinic for drugs that are orally bioavailable, e.g., cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and vinorelbine4851. There is equal interest in MET regimens in veterinary setting52,53. Over the years, we have been interested in formulating oral dose regimens of potent anticancer agents such as PTX, and doxorubicin (DOX) with well-established pharmacology and safety profiles with a long-term goal of establishing MET regimens with these agents5456. In the present study, we used PTX with established therapeutic efficacy on MTD regimens in rodent models of cancer to determine if re-formulating strategies (nPTX) can overcome PIPN in healthy rodents that allow nPTX to be further developed as MET regimens.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the potential of polyester nanoparticle-encapsulated PTX in overcoming PIPN. Our prior studies indicate that rats injected intraperitoneal with 2 mg/kg of PTX on 4 alternate days induce profound painful PIPN3032, and we adapted similar study design and compared with PTX encapsulated nanoparticles (nPTX) at same dose and frequency. The extent of PIPN in PTX and nPTX groups was examined by measuring the degree of mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in the hindpaws of the rats, histology of dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) and spinal cord as well as key molecular markers such as β-tubulin III (TUBB3), high molecular weight neurofilament protein (NFH) in DRG, spinal cord and sciatic nerve by immunofluorescence.

Results and Discussion

PTX encapsulated nanoparticles (nPTX) preparation and characterization

The process for making nPTX and their drug void particles have been thoroughly optimized at 500 mg scale levels. The process led to spherical particles of size 262±18 nm with a polydispersity index of ~0.1 across 5 different batches prepared with an entrapment of 15±2 mg of PTX (Figure 1a–c), while drug void particles are 252 nm. Earlier, we have shown efficacy of oral nPTX in cancer models53,54 and safety of the polyester particles as such on several occasions57,58. These polyesters are biodegradable with established elimination pathways via Krebs cycle that have been in human use for several decades and the outcomes of this PIPN study will allow better optimization of oral MET regimens in cancer models.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The characteristics of nPTX used in this present study. a) Table showing the formulation characteristics of different batches b) Representative dynamic light scattering (DLS) particle size distribution profile and c) Representative scanning electron micrograph of nPTX. *The difference in the entrapment numbers is not the reproducibility issue, but different volume of the suspension used in the vial for freeze drying.

Nociceptive behavioral tests

The nociceptive behavioral tests based on tactile sensitivity (von Frey filaments) and nociceptive pressure threshold (Randall-Selitto test) measurements were conducted using the two groups of animals as described in the Methods section. There was no mortality observed in any of the groups during the course of the experiment. Systemic injection of nPTX or PTX on four alternate days (total cumulative dose of 8 mg/kg) caused a gradual decrease in the baseline tactile and pressure withdrawal thresholds in rats (Figure 2a). A significant reduction in paw withdrawal threshold (15.03 ± 5.3 g) to von Frey filaments observed in all rats treated with nPTX compared to that of PTX group (4.81 ± 1.4 g) from day 8 onwards, and the reduction in the paw withdrawal thresholds persisted for at least another 10 days after the last treatment, until day 16 (Figure 2a). Unlike PTX group (12.42 ± 4.11 g), the nPTX group (20.42 ± 3.2 g) did not differ significantly from baseline values (nPTX: 25.43 ± 3.5 g; vs. PTX: 25.61 ± 4.5 g) until day 6. However, both groups showed reduced tactile withdrawal threshold on day 8 and stayed at respective values until day 16 (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

nPTX reduces the pain hypersensitivity of rats compared to those treated with PTX. a) Tactile threshold and b) Pressure threshold, time course of the effect of intraperitoneal injections of PTX and nPTX at 2mg/kg administered as indicated by arrows on x-axis. BL is baseline data. We used same rats in a & b experiments. We used same rats in a & b experiments. Comparisons were made between PTX vs nPTX using two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (n=8) Error bars represent the S.E. [a) day 6 ***p < 0.001; day 8 ****p < 0.0001; day 10 ****p < 0.0001; day 12 ***p < 0.001; day 14 ****p < 0.0001; day 16 ***p < 0.001. b) day 4 **p < 0.01; day 6 ***p < 0.001; day 8 ****p < 0.0001; day 10 ***p < 0.001; day 12 **p < 0.01; day 14 **p < 0.01; day 16 ***p < 0.001].

Similarly, the mean paw withdrawal threshold in response to the noxious pressure stimulus was reduced markedly from 197 ± 15.6 g to 132 ± 13.9 g in PTX group. By comparison, there was a small reduction in the pressure threshold in nPTX group, from 213 ± 35.3 g to 178 ± 23.68 g (Figure 2b). PIPN is considered as a major dose-limiting problem of PTX therapy. However, we are not ready yet to consider exposure-guided dosing regimens for improving risk-benefit profiles of PTX23. A primary reason for this could be due to heavy reliance on MTD regimens aiming at killing cancer cells and such high levels of systemic PTX can expose non-target vulnerable cell bodies such as DRG that lacks efficient vascular barrier59. Taking cues from our earlier efficacy data with PTX in cancer models54 as well as other studies using a variety of drugs with established toxicity profiles and their success with reformulation strategies60, we have designed this study to compare PTX with nPTX head on for its ability to overcome PIPN. The reformulation strategies permit substantial dose reduction, almost by 50% without compromising the efficacy54,60, that is primarily driven by modified pharmacokinetic profiling of the encapsulated drug54,60,61. In this study, nPTX offered better performance presumably due to sustained release behavior as opposed to PTX that is readily exposed to tissues making rats sensitive to pain (Figure 2a, b). Such risk-benefit profile studies should be better done in animal models of human pathology, in this case, cancer; however, behavior studies in such models could be complicated. These behavior analyses are further corroborated with histology and immunofluorescence, so that a correlation is established that can be taken further to efficacy studies where risk-benefit profiles can be established.

Histopathology and immunofluorescence

The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a highly vulnerable site and is involved in pathophysiological conditions such as pain and PTX is known to affect this process by increased spontaneous activity (SA) in DRG neurons62,63. PTX-induced neuronal death in DRGs is due to necrosis that is regulated by activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3)64, 65. In the current study, a significant decrease in the DRG neurons was observed in PTX groups, while nPTX showed high numbers (Figure 3a, b). The neurons in DRGs from nPTX rats are round or oval with centrally placed vesicular nucleus and prominent nucleolus. Also, seen are neurons surrounded by many satellite cells and perikaryon containing Nissl substance. However, the DRGs from PTX, revealed shrinking cells, blurry nuclei, a decrease of the Nissl bodies and widening of the cell gaps (Figure 3a). It is interesting to note that the concentration of PTX in the DRGs is same in both the groups (Figure 3c), though nPTX mitigates the PIPN. This is probably because the PTX concentration presented is the sum of free and entrapped PTX that is difficult to separate66. The nPTX offers sustained release over a period, predominantly by diffusion-based mechanism as the polyester hydrolyzes, limiting the peak concentrations (Cmax) that has been considered one of the primary reasons for PTX-induced neuropathy23,54,55,61. Prior literature suggests that PIPN is due to degeneration of afferent sensory axons that have the ability to regenerate, however, the degree and reversibility is dose and duration dependent67.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

nPTX prevents dorsal root ganglion (DRG) degeneration. a) H&E-stained sections were prepared from the DRG nerve at the end of the study. b) PTX group showed degeneration of neurons presenting significantly low in DRG numbers compared to nPTX group indicated with bright red arrowheads. c) PTX levels in DRG, the difference between PTX and nPTX groups is not statistically significant (n=4). Error bars represent the S.D., 8–10 images were used and analysis was performed using Student’s t-test, ***p < 0.001.

It is well perceived that the sensory neurons are more sensitive to PTX compared to motor neurons, making motor neuropathy less frequent68,69. This is because the cell bodies of sensory neurons lie outside the blood brain barrier, exposing them to higher levels of PTX than those of motor neurons within the spinal cord59. This reflects from the tissue distribution data, where PTX levels between both groups are statistically insignificant and are about 100 orders of magnitude lower than DRG levels (Figure 4c). Consistent with behavior assessment and DRG histology, the rats in nPTX group showed higher number of motor neurons in spinal cord compared to PTX group (Figure 4b). We also observed axons and oligodendrocytes degeneration in PTX group and not nPTX (Figure 4a). Our earlier studies suggests that PTX treatment increases presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) activity at spinal cord level that serves as upstream signaling for protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated tonic activation of presynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), leading to increased nociceptive input from primary afferent nerves and development of neuropathic pain30, 31. Unlike, peripheral sensory neurons, spinal cord neurons are unable to regenerate67, 70 and our data suggests that PTX causes neuronal death and this could be addressed in part by developing sustained release formulations (Figure 4a, b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

nPTX increase motor neuron survival in spinal cord (SC) region. a) Representative images of ventral root horn spinal cords of PTX and nPTX treated rats. b) SC motor neuron counts significantly decreased in PTX groups compared to nPTX. Images were acquired at 10 and 40× original magnification. c) PTX levels in SC, the difference between PTX and nPTX groups is not statistically significant (n=4). The PTX levels between DRG and SC are about 100 orders of magnitude, presumably due to the deficiency in blood-nerve barrier in the former. The yellow arrows mark axons and red are oligodendrocytes. Error bars represent the S.D., 8–10 images were used and analysis was performed using Student’s t-test, ***p < 0.001.

The microtubule stabilizing drug PTX is widely used as a cytostatic agent in oncology at maximum tolerated doses (MTD); however, its application is limited by the risk of dose dependent neuropathies. On the other hand, at low doses, it can stabilize the microtubules and prevent axon degeneration and promote survival71,72. The microtubules are integral to healthy functioning of axons and tubulin β-III (TUBB3) is the most dynamic β‐tubulin isoform that is highly expressed in axons73. The degeneration of axons interrupt the signal flow from one neuron to the other and been identified as major pathology in PIPN. A recent report suggests that TUBB3 is not required for normal neuronal function; however, it is necessary for timely axon regeneration74. Our TUBB3 immunofluorescence data shows significantly lower staining in PTX group compared to nPTX across all the tissues suggesting axons are degenerated (Figure 5a–c). The morphometric analysis reveals that the DRGs in PTX group are shrunken and lost the sheath around neuronal cell body, while in the nPTX group we can see a thick sheath around the DRG (Figure 5b). Similarly, in PTX group we see significant axon degeneration in the sciatic nerve that is made up of axons of sensory and motor neurons (Figure 5c). The TUBB3 data is consistent with the histology findings and behavior outcomes. There is ample literature suggesting that moderate microtubule stabilization decrease scarring and enables axon regeneration after spinal cord injury75. Overall, these findings suggest that in PTX group the breakdown of the microtubule cytoskeleton leads to axon degeneration contributing to PIPN. The role of calcium signaling in peripheral neuropathy is well documented in the literature and parvalbumin (PVALB) is the most commonly used neuronal marker76. A recent study proposes that dorsal horn PVALB interneurons function as gate-keepers of touch-evoked pain after nerve injury. In doing so, they demonstrated that that ablating PVALB neurons in naive mice produce neuropathic pain-like mechanical allodynia via disinhibition of PKCγ excitatory interneurons. In contrary, activating PVALB neurons in nerve-injured mice alleviates mechanical hypersensitivity77. PVALB immunoreactivity was insignificant between the two groups in spinal cord (dorsal/ventral horns and grey matter areas) and sciatic nerve but significant in DRGs (Figure 5a–c). The TUBB3/PVALB colocalization is significant between PTX and nPTX, however the trends are reverse where spinal cord and sciatic showed on the lower side, while DRG is high and this is in alignment with high TUBB3 and significant/insignificant PVALB staining (Figure 5a–c). The PVALB data from this study is inconclusive because both injured and uninjured neurons can stain positive without having to downregulate in injured and upregulate in spared neurons78 can stain positive without having to downregulate in injured and upregulate in spared neurons78. Further investigations with more specific neuronal marker such as activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) to identify injured neurons may help understand the role of PVALB in PIPN.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Double immunofluorescence with ß-tubulin III [TUBB3] (red) and parvalbumin [PVALB] (green) in a) spinal cord showing high TUBB3 and insignificant PVALB staining in nPTX compared to PTX group, images are acquired at 6× magnification under tile scan mode (3×3) b) DRG showing high TUBB3 and PVALB staining in nPTX compared to PTX group, yellow arrow marks myelin sheath in nPTX group that is absent in PTX c) sciatic nerve showing high TUBB3 and insignificant PVALB staining in nPTX compared to PTX group. Quantification of TUBB3, PVALB and TUBB3/PVALB colocalization in a) spinal cord b) DRG and c) sciatic nerve. Error bars represent the S.D., 8–10 images were used and analysis was performed using Student’s t test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

PTX treatment increases terminal dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive necrotic astrocytes, DRG neurons, and sciatic nerves, however these neurons stay protected in nPTX group with no TUNEL-positive nuclei (Figure 6). A plausible mechanism of PTX peripheral neuropathy is via the activation of spinal astrocytes that can be evaluated by the expression of GFAP79. The expression intensity of GFAP in the PTX-treated group appears significantly lower than the nPTX group, probably due to the fact that the TUNEL positive nuclei are very high in PTX group masking the GFAP impact (Figure 6a). Further, our data is consistent with the literature80 that PTX treatment would lead to DRG necrosis leading to allodynia that minimizes in nPTX group (Figure 6b). The immunohistochemical analysis showed that both PTX and nPTX administration did not alter the GFAP immunoreactivity in the DRGs (Figure 6b). Sciatic nerves showed loss of GFAP staining in PTX group due to loss/breaks of axons/nerve fibers; however, one can see long axons in the nPTX group (Figure 6c). The axonal loss in PTX group reflected in the behavior study making rodents sensitive to pain, probably due to inefficient nerve regeneration as the breaks in fibers lead to disconnect between Schwann cells, axons and the extracellular matrix.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Double immunofluorescence with GFAP (red) and TUNEL (green) in a) spinal cord showing high TUNEL positive cells and low GFAP staining in PTX compared to nPTX group, images are acquired at 6× magnification under tile scan mode (3×3) b) DRG showing high TUNEL positive cells and insignificant GFAP staining in PTX compared to nPTX group e) sciatic nerve showing high TUNEL positive cells and low GFAP staining in PTX compared to nPTX group. Quantification of TUNEL positive cells and GFAP in a) spinal cord b) DRG and c) sciatic nerve. Error bars represent the S.D., 8–10 images were used and analysis was performed using Student’s t test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Myelin is an insulator and forms an important component of vertebrate system that envelopes most of nerve cell axons. An enzyme called 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase (CNPase) makes up a large part of total protein within the non-compact myelin regions, and its dysfunction causes severe neurological symptoms. The lack of CNPase can lead to loss of axons and severe neurological complications81, and overexpression of CNPase can lead to a reduction in the overall amount of myelin, as well as lead to inflammation82. We have observed highly significant CNPase staining in both central (oligodendrocytes) and peripheral (Schwann cells) tissues in PTX groups, but not in nPTX groups (Figures 7a–c). In contrast, PTX drastically decreased high molecular weight neurofilament (NF-H) that is essential in axonal stabilization, which is preserved in nPTX (Figure 7a–c). In nPTX group, we see a strong co-localization of CNPase and NF-H, presenting an intact central and peripheral nervous system that corroborates with behavior data (Figure 7a–c).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Double immunofluorescence with CNPase (red) and NF-H (green) in a) spinal cord showing high CNPase and low NF-H staining in PTX compared to nPTX group, images are acquired at 6× magnification under tile scan mode (3×3) b) DRG showing high CNPase and low NF-H staining in PTX compared to nPTX group c) sciatic nerve showing high CNPase and low NF-H staining in PTX compared to nPTX group. High magnification images of a1) spinal cord b1) DRG and c1) sciatic nerve. The CNPase and NF-H fluorescent intensities as well as CNPase/NF-H %colocalization for all the tissues were plotted. Error bars represent the S.D., 8–10 images were used and analysis was performed using Student’s t test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Conclusion

We have shown that PTX-encapsulated polyester nanoparticles with established therapeutic potential in cancer models, mitigates PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy. Our findings suggest that sustained release MET dose regimens is a promising strategy to maximize therapeutics benefits minimizing PIPN. These findings need to be verified in tumor models on MET regimens in order to establish risk-benefit profile.

Methods

PTX encapsulated nanoparticles (nPTX) preparation and characterization

PTX encapsulated nanoparticles are prepared according to protocols previously developed in our lab with slight modifications54,55. In brief, 500 mg polylactide-coglycolide [PLGA (50:50) Resomer R503H; MW 35–40 kDa] dissolved in 20 mL of ethyl acetate, and 30 mg of PTX dissolved in 5 mL of ethyl acetate, under stirring for 1 h @1000 rpm, constitutes the organic phase and this is further stirred for 15 min. Aqueous phase is prepared by dissolving 750 mg of d-α-Tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (Vitamin E TPGS) in water under stirring for 1 h at 1000 rpm. The oil phase is added to aqueous phase dropwise and stirred for 30 min at 1000 rpm. This emulsion is subjected to homogenization for 45 min at 10,000 rpm. The emulsion is added to 250 mL of water to facilitate the diffusion of organic solvent to aqueous phase that is then evaporated overnight under stirring at 1000 rpm. The particle size is measured for fresh preparations (20 μl sample diluted to 1 ml using water) using zeta sizer (Malvern Nazo ZS). The total preparation is about 300 mL that is distributed equally into centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 15,000 g/4 oC for 30 min. The supernatant is collected and stored for analyzing the free PTX. To the pellets, 25 mL of sucrose solution (5% w/v) added and pooled together. This suspension is the distributed 10 mL into 20 mL vials and 2 mL each in 5 mL vials for particle size and entrapment efficiency post freeze drying. The freeze drying conditions are as follow: 1) Freeze (3 h) −50 oC; safety pressure 1.650; 2) main drying (48 h) −50 oC; 0.004 mBar vacuum; safety pressure 1.650; 3) final drying +20 oC; 0.004 mBar vacuum for 12 h; safety pressure 1.650. The freeze dried samples (2 mL volume samples) are re-constituted in 40 mL water by probe sonicating for 30 sec @ 20% amplitude and particle size is recorded. The samples are subjected to centrifugation to collect the pellet at 18,000 g/4 oC for 30 min. The pellets are dissolved in acetonitrile and entrapment is assessed by HPLC method reported earlier54,55.

Animal Model and PTX/nPTX Treatment

To assess if nanoparticle encapsulated PTX (nPTX) can mitigate PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy, experiments were conducted using adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (220–250 g; Harlan, Indianapolis, IN). A total of 16 rats (n=8 per group) was used for the entire study. All procedures and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Rats received 2 mg/kg PTX (cremophor EL used as a vehicle) or nPTX (water used as a vehicle) intraperitoneally on four alternate days, as described previously 8,31. We confirmed the presence of mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in the hindpaws of the rats 8 to 16 days after the completion of PTX treatment. All terminal experiments were conducted 16 days after the last PTX or nPTX injection.

Nociceptive behavioral tests

To determine tactile sensitivity, individual rats were acclimatized for 30 min on a mesh floor within suspended chambers. Once acclimatized, each rat was applied a series of calibrated von Frey filaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) perpendicularly to the plantar surface of both hind paws with sufficient force to bend the filament for 6 s and the response was recorded. A brisk withdrawal or flinching of the paw was considered a positive response. In the absence of a response, a filament of the next greater force was applied. If a response was observed, a filament of the next lower force was applied. The tactile stimulus with a 50% likelihood of producing a withdrawal response was calculated using the “up-down” method56.

To determine the mechanical nociceptive threshold, we conducted the paw pressure (Randall-Selitto) test on the left hind paw using an analgesiometer (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy). A constantly increasing force on a linear scale was applied to the hind-paw. When the animal displayed pain by withdrawing the paw or vocalizing, the device was immediately inactivated, and the animal’s withdrawal threshold was read on the scale83, 84. A maximum of 400 g of pressure was used as a cutoff to avoid tissue injury to the rats. The investigator conducting the behavioral tests was blinded to the treatment.

Histology and immunofluorescence studies

After the last dose of treatment on the 16th day, terminal anesthesia was induced by administering 0.9 ml of 3 mg/ml pentobarbitone. Subsequently, transcardiac perfusion with 60 ml of 0.9% NaCl followed by 60 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer was carried out. L2–L5 dorsal root ganglions (DRGs), sciatic nerves (SN) and spinal cord (SC) at mid-thigh were carefully dissected from each animal, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde until the tissues were properly fixed. After fixation, the DRG, SN, SC tissues were processed for paraffin embedding. Each tissue was sectioned at a thickness of 6 μm onto charged slides that were then stored at −80°C. General H&E staining were performed for all sections. Images were acquired with a bright-field microscope at the original magnification of 10× and 40× (3000-LED Microscope; ACCU-SCOPE). Quantitative analyses were performed using multiple images (10 different fields of view at 10× magnification per slide) from multiple rat samples (each slide containing multiple SC, DRG, or SN 6–8 tissue sections) under the microscope. For immunofluorescence, tissue slides were warmed to 60 degrees Celsius, washed sequentially in xylene, 90% ethanol, and PBS solutions (each for 10 minutes). To prevent non-specific binding, the slides were blocked for 1 hour in PBS containing 3% normal goat serum or horse serum (Vector Laboratories Inc., USA). The slides were incubated overnight in a humidity chamber with the following antibody pairs: rabbit monoclonal antibody to β3-Tubulin (D71G9 clone; 1:200; 5568, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and mouse monoclonal antibody to Parvalbumin (PARV-19 clone; 1:1000; Sigma, USA), or rabbit monoclonal antibody to CNPase (D83E10 clone; 1:100; Cell Signaling # 5664, USA) and mouse monoclonal antibody to neurofilament-H subunit (RNF402 clone; 1:50; Santa Cruz −32729, USA). Slides were then washed and incubated with respective anti-mouse (Alexa Fluor 488, goat anti-mouse) or anti-rabbit (Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit) secondary antibodies (1:2000; Invitrogen technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 hours. For dual labelling of GFAP and TUNEL, the SC, DRG, SN sections were stained with Rabbit monoclonal antibody to GFAP (D1F4Q clone; 1:200; Cell Signaling Technology #12389, Danvers, MA, USA) overnight in the humidity chamber. The slides were washed and incubated with an anti-rabbit (Alexa Fluor 594) secondary antibody (1:2000; Invitrogen technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 hours. The slides were washed three times with PBS, and the tissue sections were stained with a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) reaction mixture using an in situ cell death detection kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Finally, the slides were washed and cover-slipped with Vectashield Antifade Mounting Media containing DAPI (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Tissue sections were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 780, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) at 20× original magnification, and in case of SC, whole composite images were acquired at 6× magnification under tile scan mode (3×3). Fluorescence quantification was performed with ImageJ software and the results were expressed as an average of at least 10–14 images per group. Fluorescent image analysis was performed with a Zeiss ZEN Software (Zen Blue 2.3).

PTX levels in DRG and spinal cord

In a separate study, we used 4 rats to assess the distribution of PTX in the DRG and SC tissues. The rats weighing 220–250 g (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were administered 2 mg/kg intraperitoneally in a similar regimen as used in the PINP study, but the rats were sacrificed 2 h after injecting the fourth dose of PTX/nPTX and the DRG and SC were collected for PTX estimation.

LC-MS method for PTX analysis in DRG and SC

The PTX in samples were detected and quantified on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Quantiva, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) coupled to a binary pump HPLC (UltiMate 3000, Thermo Scientific). MS parameters were optimized for PTX under direct infusion at 5 μL min-1 to identify the SRM transitions (precursor/product fragment ion pair) with the highest intensity as 876.3–308.04 m/z for the sodium adduct of PTX and 830.3–549.2 m/z for the internal standard, Docetaxel. Samples were maintained at 4 °C on an autosampler before injection. The injection volume was 10 μL. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Hypersil Gold 5 μm 50 × 3 mm column (Thermo Scientific) maintained at 30 °C using a solvent gradient method. Solvent A was water (0.1% formic acid). Solvent B was acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid). The gradient method used was 0–1.6 min (20% B to 80% B), 1.6–4 min (80% B), 4–5 min (80% B to 20% B), 5–6 min (20% B). The flow rate was 0.5 mL min-1. Sample acquisition and analysis was performed with TraceFinder 3.3 (Thermo Scientific). Data is calculated using standard curves generated for PTX.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 Software. Data were presented as the means S.E. or S.D. To compare the difference in the pain hypersensitivity and tissue data between PTX and nPTX-treated groups, we used twoway analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (figure 2) or Student’s t-test (figures 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7). The level of statistical significance was set at *p < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources

M.N.V.R.K. is supported in part by National Institutes of Health R01EY028169 and startup funds from the College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University. H.-L.P is supported in parts by National Institutes of Health (R01GM120844 and R01NS101880).

References

  • (1).DeVita VT Jr., and Chu E (2008) A history of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 68, 8643–8653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Goodman LS, Wintrobe MM, et al. (1946) Nitrogen mustard therapy; use of methylbis (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride and tris (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin’s disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders. J. Am. Med. Assoc 132, 126–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Wall ME, and Wani MC (1995) Camptothecin and taxol: discovery to clinic--thirteenth Bruce F. Cain Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res. 55, 753–760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Wani MC, Taylor HL, Wall ME, Coggon P, and McPhail AT (1971) Plant antitumor agents. VI. The isolation and structure of taxol, a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent from Taxus brevifolia. J. Am. Chem. Soc 93, 2325–2327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Ojima I, Lichtenthal B, Lee S, Wang C, and Wang X (2016) Taxane anticancer agents: a patent perspective. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat 26, 1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Schiff PB, Fant J, and Horwitz SB (1979) Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol. Nature 277, 665–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Zhu J, Beattie EC, Yang Y, Wang HJ, Seo JY, and Yang LX (2005) Centrosome impairments and consequent cytokinesis defects are possible mechanisms of taxane drugs. Anticancer Res. 25, 1919–1925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Dumontet C, and Jordan MA (2010) Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 9, 790–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Jordan MA, and Kamath K (2007) How do microtubule-targeted drugs work? An overview. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 7, 730–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Jordan MA, and Wilson L (2004) Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 253–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Guastalla JP 3rd, and Dieras V (2003) The taxanes: toxicity and quality of life considerations in advanced ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 89 Suppl 3, S16–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Tkaczuk KH (2009) Review of the contemporary cytotoxic and biologic combinations available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Ther 31 Pt 2, 2273–2289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Conte P, and Guarneri V (2012) The next generation of biologic agents: therapeutic role in relation to existing therapies in metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 12, 157–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Canta A, Chiorazzi A, and Cavaletti G (2009) Tubulin: a target for antineoplastic drugs into the cancer cells but also in the peripheral nervous system. Curr. Med. Chem 16, 1315–1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Kudlowitz D, and Muggia F (2013) Defining risks of taxane neuropathy: insights from randomized clinical trials. Clin. Cancer. Res 19, 4570–4577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Page RD, Orsini J, Sakai H, Zhang H, Renschler MF, and Socinski MA (2014) Patient-reported neuropathy and taxane-associated symptoms in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol 9, 83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Castelli V, Palumbo P, d’Angelo M, Moorthy NK, Antonosante A, Catanesi M, Lombardi F, Iannotta D, Cinque B, Benedetti E, Ippoliti R, Cifone MG, and Cimini A (2018) Probiotic DSF counteracts chemotherapy induced neuropathic pain. Oncotarget 9, 27998–28008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Zirpoli GR, McCann SE, Sucheston-Campbell LE, Hershman DL, Ciupak G, Davis W, Unger JM, Moore HCF, Stewart JA, Isaacs C, Hobday TJ, Salim M, Hortobagyi GN, Gralow JR, Budd GT, Albain KS, and Ambrosone CB (2017) Supplement Use and Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in a Cooperative Group Trial (S0221): The DELCaP Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Majithia N, Loprinzi CL, and Smith TJ (2016) New Practical Approaches to Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain: Prevention, Assessment, and Treatment. Oncology (Williston Park) 30, 1020–1029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Bao T, Seidman AD, Piulson L, Vertosick E, Chen X, Vickers AJ, Blinder VS, Zhi WI, Li Q, Vahdat LT, Dickler MN, Robson ME, and Mao JJ (2018) A phase IIA trial of acupuncture to reduce chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy severity during neoadjuvant or adjuvant weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur. J. Cancer 101, 12–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Hanai A, Ishiguro H, Sozu T, Tsuda M, Yano I, Nakagawa T, Imai S, Hamabe Y, Toi M, Arai H, and Tsuboyama T (2018) Effects of Cryotherapy on Objective and Subjective Symptoms of Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathy: Prospective Self-Controlled Trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 110, 141–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Majithia N, Smith TJ, Coyne PJ, Abdi S, Pachman DR, Lachance D, Shelerud R, Cheville A, Basford JR, Farley D, O’Neill C, Ruddy KJ, Sparadeo F, Beutler A, and Loprinzi CL (2016) Scrambler Therapy for the management of chronic pain. Support. Care Cancer 24, 2807–2814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Hertz DL, Kidwell KM, Vangipuram K, Li F, Pai MP, Burness M, Griggs JJ, Schott AF, Van Poznak C, Hayes DF, Lavoie Smith EM, and Henry NL (2018) Paclitaxel Plasma Concentration after the First Infusion Predicts Treatment-Limiting Peripheral Neuropathy. Clin. Cancer. Res 24, 3602–3610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Curry ZA, Wilkerson JL, Bagdas D, Kyte SL, Patel N, Donvito G, Mustafa MA, Poklis JL, Niphakis MJ, Hsu KL, Cravatt BF, Gewirtz DA, Damaj MI, and Lichtman AH (2018) Monoacylglycerol Lipase Inhibitors Reverse Paclitaxel-Induced Nociceptive Behavior and Proinflammatory Markers in a Mouse Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 366, 169–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Boehmerle W, Huehnchen P, Lee SLL, Harms C, and Endres M (2018) TRPV4 inhibition prevents paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity in preclinical models. Exp. Neurol 306, 64–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Xu J, Zhang L, Xie M, Li Y, Huang P, Saunders TL, Fox DA, Rosenquist R, and Lin F (2018) Role of Complement in a Rat Model of Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. J. Immunol 200, 4094–4101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Li Y, Tatsui CE, Rhines LD, North RY, Harrison DS, Cassidy RM, Johansson CA, Kosturakis AK, Edwards DD, Zhang H, and Dougherty PM (2017) Dorsal root ganglion neurons become hyperexcitable and increase expression of voltage-gated T-type calcium channels (Cav3.2) in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Pain 158, 417–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Zhang H, Li Y, de Carvalho-Barbosa M, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ, Albrecht PJ, and Dougherty PM (2016) Dorsal Root Ganglion Infiltration by Macrophages Contributes to Paclitaxel Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. J. Pain 17, 775–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Xie JD, Chen SR, Chen H, Zeng WA, and Pan HL (2016) Presynaptic NMethyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Activity Is Increased Through Protein Kinase C in Paclitaxel-induced Neuropathic Pain. J. Biol. Chem 291, 19364–19373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Chen SR, Zhu L, Chen H, Wen L, Laumet G, and Pan HL (2014) Increased spinal cord Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(−) cotransporter-1 (NKCC1) activity contributes to impairment of synaptic inhibition in paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. J. Biol. Chem 289, 31111–31120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Xie JD, Chen SR, and Pan HL (2017) Presynaptic mGluR5 receptor controls glutamatergic input through protein kinase C-NMDA receptors in paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. J. Biol. Chem 292, 20644–20654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Smith JA, Slusher BS, Wozniak KM, Farah MH, Smiyun G, Wilson L, Feinstein S, and Jordan MA (2016) Structural Basis for Induction of Peripheral Neuropathy by Microtubule-Targeting Cancer Drugs. Cancer Res. 76, 5115–5123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Sofias AM, Dunne M, Storm G, and Allen C (2017) The battle of “nano” paclitaxel. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 122, 20–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Chauhan VP, and Jain RK (2013) Strategies for advancing cancer nanomedicine. Nat Mater 12, 958–962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, and Farokhzad OC (2017) Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Lammers T, Kiessling F, Ashford M, Hennink W, Crommelin D, and Storm G (2016) Cancer nanomedicine: Is targeting our target? Nat Rev Mater 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, and Langer R (2007) Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol 2, 751–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Ahn HK, Jung M, Sym SJ, Shin DB, Kang SM, Kyung SY, Park JW, Jeong SH, and Cho EK (2014) A phase II trial of Cremorphor EL-free paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol 74, 277–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Kim HS, Lee JY, Lim SH, Sun JM, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Park K, Moon SH, and Ahn MJ (2015) A Prospective Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Cremophor EL-Free Paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) in Patients with Unresectable Thymic Epithelial Tumors. J. Thorac. Oncol 10, 1800–1806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Park IH, Sohn JH, Kim SB, Lee KS, Chung JS, Lee SH, Kim TY, Jung KH, Cho EK, Kim YS, Song HS, Seo JH, Ryoo HM, Lee SA, Yoon SY, Kim CS, Kim YT, Kim SY, Jin MR, and Ro J (2017) An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 49, 569–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Chan TS, Hsu CC, Pai VC, Liao WY, Huang SS, Tan KT, Yen CJ, Hsu SC, Chen WY, Shan YS, Li CR, Lee MT, Jiang KY, Chu JM, Lien GS, Weaver VM, and Tsai KK (2016) Metronomic chemotherapy prevents therapy-induced stromal activation and induction of tumor-initiating cells. J. Exp. Med 213, 2967–2988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Villanueva MT (2016) Tumour-Initiating cells: The cell that rocks the tumour. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Kerbel RS, and Shaked Y (2016) Therapy-activated stromal cells can dictate tumor fate. J. Exp. Med 213, 2831–2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Andre N, Padovani L, and Pasquier E (2011) Metronomic scheduling of anticancer treatment: the next generation of multitarget therapy? Future Oncol. 7, 385–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Andre N, Carre M, and Pasquier E (2014) Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 11, 413–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Kerbel RS, and Shaked Y (2017) The potential clinical promise of ‘multimodality’ metronomic chemotherapy revealed by preclinical studies of metastatic disease. Cancer Lett. 400, 293–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Cazzaniga ME, Dionisio MR, and Riva F (2017) Metronomic chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients. Cancer Lett. 400, 252–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Cazzaniga ME, Cortesi L, Ferzi A, Scaltriti L, Cicchiello F, Ciccarese M, Della Torre S, Villa F, Giordano M, Verusio C, Nicolini M, Gambaro AR, Zanlorenzi L, Biraghi E, Legramandi L, Rulli E, and Group VS (2016) Metronomic chemotherapy with oral vinorelbine (mVNR) and capecitabine (mCAPE) in advanced HER2-negative breast cancer patients: is it a way to optimize disease control? Final results of the VICTOR-2 study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 160, 501–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Munzone E, and Colleoni M (2015) Clinical overview of metronomic chemotherapy in breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 12, 631–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Robison NJ, Campigotto F, Chi SN, Manley PE, Turner CD, Zimmerman MA, Chordas CA, Werger AM, Allen JC, Goldman S, Rubin JB, Isakoff MS, Pan WJ, Khatib ZA, Comito MA, Bendel AE, Pietrantonio JB, Kondrat L, Hubbs SM, Neuberg DS, and Kieran MW (2014) A phase II trial of a multi-agent oral antiangiogenic (metronomic) regimen in children with recurrent or progressive cancer. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 61, 636–642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Leo C, Stell A, Borrego J, Martinez de Merlo E, Ruess-Melzer K, and Lara-Garcia A (2014) Evaluation of low-dose metronomic (LDM) cyclophosphamide toxicity in cats with malignant neoplasia. J. Feline Med. Surg 16, 671–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Biller B (2014) Metronomic chemotherapy in veterinary patients with cancer: rethinking the targets and strategies of chemotherapy. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract 44, 817–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Bhardwaj V, Ankola DD, Gupta SC, Schneider M, Lehr CM, and Kumar MNVR (2009) PLGA nanoparticles stabilized with cationic surfactant: safety studies and application in oral delivery of paclitaxel to treat chemical-induced breast cancer in rat. Pharm. Res 26, 2495–2503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Bhardwaj V, Plumb JA, Cassidy J, and Kumar MNVR (2010) Evaluating the potential of polymer nanoparticles for oral delivery of paclitaxel in drug-resistant cancer. Cancer Nanotechnol. 1, 29–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Kalaria DR, Sharma G, Beniwal V, and Kumar MNVR (2009) Design of biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of doxorubicin: in vivo pharmacokinetics and toxicity studies in rats. Pharm. Res 26, 492–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, and Yaksh TL (1994) Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J. Neurosci. Methods 53, 55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Ganugula R, Arora M, Jaisamut P, Wiwattanapatapee R, Jorgensen HG, Venkatpurwar VP, Zhou B, Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Basu R, Guo S, and Kumar MNVR (2017) Nano-curcumin safely prevents streptozotocin-induced inflammation and apoptosis in pancreatic beta cells for effective management of Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Br. J. Pharmacol 174, 2074–2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Venkatpurwar VP, Rhodes S, Oien KA, Elliott MA, Tekwe CD, Jorgensen HG, and Kumar MNVR (2015) Drug- not carrier-dependent haematological and biochemical changes in a repeated dose study of cyclosporine encapsulated polyester nano- and micro-particles: size does not matter. Toxicology 330, 9–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Areti A, Yerra VG, Naidu V, and Kumar A (2014) Oxidative stress and nerve damage: role in chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy. Redox Biol 2, 289–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Mittal G, Chandraiah G, Ramarao P, and Kumar MNVR (2009) Pharmacodynamic evaluation of oral estradiol nanoparticles in estrogen deficient (ovariectomized) high-fat diet induced hyperlipidemic rat model. Pharm. Res 26, 218–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Mittal G, and Kumar MNVR (2009) Impact of polymeric nanoparticles on oral pharmacokinetics: a dose-dependent case study with estradiol. J. Pharm. Sci 98, 3730–3734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Zhang H, and Dougherty PM (2014) Enhanced excitability of primary sensory neurons and altered gene expression of neuronal ion channels in dorsal root ganglion in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Anesthesiology 120, 1463–1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Li Y, North RY, Rhines LD, Tatsui CE, Rao G, Edwards DD, Cassidy RM, Harrison DS, Johansson CA, Zhang H, and Dougherty PM (2018) DRG Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel 1.7 Is Upregulated in Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathy in Rats and in Humans with Neuropathic Pain. J. Neurosci 38, 1124–1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Scuteri A, Nicolini G, Miloso M, Bossi M, Cavaletti G, Windebank AJ, and Tredici G (2006) Paclitaxel toxicity in post-mitotic dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells. Anticancer Res. 26, 1065–1070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Hunt D, Raivich G, and Anderson PN (2012) Activating transcription factor 3 and the nervous system. Front. Mol. Neurosci 5, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Krishna R, Webb MS, St Onge G, and Mayer LD (2001) Liposomal and nonliposomal drug pharmacokinetics after administration of liposome-encapsulated vincristine and their contribution to drug tissue distribution properties. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 298, 1206–1212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (67).Cavaletti G, and Marmiroli P (2010) Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. Nat. Rev. Neurol 6, 657–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Freilich RJ, Balmaceda C, Seidman AD, Rubin M, and DeAngelis LM (1996) Motor neuropathy due to docetaxel and paclitaxel. Neurology 47, 115–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Scripture CD, Figg WD, and Sparreboom A (2006) Peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel: recent insights and future perspectives. Curr. Neuropharmacol 4, 165–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Tasnim A, Rammelkamp Z, Slusher AB, Wozniak K, Slusher BS, and Farah MH (2016) Paclitaxel causes degeneration of both central and peripheral axon branches of dorsal root ganglia in mice. BMC Neurosci 17, 47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (71).He M, Ding Y, Chu C, Tang J, Xiao Q, and Luo ZG (2016) Autophagy induction stabilizes microtubules and promotes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 113, 11324–11329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (72).Conde C, and Caceres A (2009) Microtubule assembly, organization and dynamics in axons and dendrites. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 10, 319–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (73).Tischfield MA, Baris HN, Wu C, Rudolph G, Van Maldergem L, He W, Chan WM, Andrews C, Demer JL, Robertson RL, Mackey DA, Ruddle JB, Bird TD, Gottlob I, Pieh C, Traboulsi EI, Pomeroy SL, Hunter DG, Soul JS, Newlin A, Sabol LJ, Doherty EJ, de Uzcategui CE, de Uzcategui N, Collins ML, Sener EC, Wabbels B, Hellebrand H, Meitinger T, de Berardinis T, Magli A, Schiavi C, Pastore-Trossello M, Koc F, Wong AM, Levin AV, Geraghty MT, Descartes M, Flaherty M, Jamieson RV, Moller HU, Meuthen I, Callen DF, Kerwin J, Lindsay S, Meindl A, Gupta ML Jr., Pellman D, and Engle EC (2010) Human TUBB3 mutations perturb microtubule dynamics, kinesin interactions, and axon guidance. Cell 140, 74–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (74).Latremoliere A, Cheng L, DeLisle M, Wu C, Chew S, Hutchinson EB, Sheridan A, Alexandre C, Latremoliere F, Sheu SH, Golidy S, Omura T, Huebner EA, Fan Y, Whitman MC, Nguyen E, Hermawan C, Pierpaoli C, Tischfield MA, Woolf CJ, and Engle EC (2018) Neuronal-Specific TUBB3 Is Not Required for Normal Neuronal Function but Is Essential for Timely Axon Regeneration. Cell Rep. 24, 1865–1879e1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (75).Hellal F, Hurtado A, Ruschel J, Flynn KC, Laskowski CJ, Umlauf M, Kapitein LC, Strikis D, Lemmon V, Bixby J, Hoogenraad CC, and Bradke F (2011) Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science 331, 928–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (76).Shortland PJ, and Mahns DA (2016) Differing roles for parvalbumin neurons after nerve injury. Neural Regen Res 11, 1241–1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (77).Petitjean H, Pawlowski SA, Fraine SL, Sharif B, Hamad D, Fatima T, Berg J, Brown CM, Jan LY, Ribeiro-da-Silva A, Braz JM, Basbaum AI, and Sharif-Naeini R (2015) Dorsal Horn Parvalbumin Neurons Are Gate-Keepers of Touch-Evoked Pain after Nerve Injury. Cell Rep. 13, 1246–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (78).Medici T, and Shortland PJ (2015) Effects of peripheral nerve injury on parvalbumin expression in adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. BMC Neurosci. 16, 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (79).Zhang H, Yoon SY, Zhang H, and Dougherty PM (2012) Evidence that spinal astrocytes but not microglia contribute to the pathogenesis of Paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy. J. Pain 13, 293–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (80).Choi SS, Koh WU, Nam JS, Shin JW, Leem JG, and Suh JH (2013) Effect of ethyl pyruvate on Paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain in rats. Korean J. Pain 26, 135–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (81).Lappe-Siefke C, Goebbels S, Gravel M, Nicksch E, Lee J, Braun PE, Griffiths IR, and Nave KA (2003) Disruption of Cnp1 uncouples oligodendroglial functions in axonal support and myelination. Nat. Genet 33, 366–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (82).Gravel M, Peterson J, Yong VW, Kottis V, Trapp B, and Braun PE (1996) Overexpression of 2’,3’-cyclic nucleotide 3’-phosphodiesterase in transgenic mice alters oligodendrocyte development and produces aberrant myelination. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 7, 453–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (83).Chen SR, Hu YM, Chen H, and Pan HL (2014) Calcineurin inhibitor induces pain hypersensitivity by potentiating pre- and postsynaptic NMDA receptor activity in spinal cords. J. Physiol 592, 215–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (84).Chen SR, Chen H, Yuan WX, and Pan HL (2011) Increased presynaptic and postsynaptic alpha2-adrenoceptor activity in the spinal dorsal horn in painful diabetic neuropathy. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 337, 285–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES