Abstract
Objectives
To study the correlation between knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of antibiotic consumption with epidemiology and molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) carriage, in order to identify modifiable factors and public health interventions to reduce prevalence of multidrug-resistant organism colonisation in the community.
Design
Cross-sectional questionnaire of KAP towards antibiotic use and collection of stool samples or rectal swabs. ESBL-PE isolates obtained underwent whole genome sequencing to identify resistance genes.
Setting
A densely populated community in Singapore.
Participants
There were 693 healthy community-dwelling questionnaire respondents. Out of which, 305 provided stool samples or rectal swabs.
Results
The overall knowledge of antibiotic use was poor (mean score 4.6/10, IQR 3.0–6.0). 80 participants (80/305, 26.2%) carried at least one ESBL-PE isolate. The most common ESBL-PE was Escherichia coli sequence type 131 carrying CTX-M type beta-lactamases (11/71, 15.5%). Living overseas for >1 year (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.9) but not short-term travel, recent hospitalisation or antibiotic intake was associated with ESBL-PE carriage. Interestingly, higher knowledge scores (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.9) and having no leftover antibiotics (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.9) were independent factors associated with ESBL-PE carriage in the multivariate logistic regression model.
Conclusions
While the role of trans-border transmission of antimicrobial resistance is well known, we may have to examine the current recommendation that all antibiotics courses have to be completed. Clinical trials to determine the optimum duration of treatment for common infections are critically important.
Keywords: extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae, antimicrobial resistance, duration of antibiotic treatment
Strengths and limitations of this study.
Based on individual-level data, we adopted a novel approach of correlating knowledge, attitude and practice of antibiotic use with asymptomatic carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae to identify modifiable factors to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in the community.
We randomly sampled a large number of households in the community representative of the Singaporean general public in terms of demographics and socioeconomic status.
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae were confirmed with both phenotypic antibiotic susceptibilities and whole genome sequencing.
We minimised recall and interviewer biases by designing specific questions that are carefully constructed to maximise accuracy and completeness, and all interviewers were trained to adhere to the question and answer format strictly.
Correlations found in the study cannot be viewed as causal given the complexities in the emergence and transmission of antimicrobial resistance.
Introduction
Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDRE) have been identified as ‘critical priority’ resistant organisms by WHO in 2017, and are associated with a high overall all-cause mortality, transmissibility and burden.1 Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is most commonly mediated via the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases.2 MDRE infections are difficult to treat with few effective antimicrobials on the horizon.1 Healthy members of the community are increasingly identified as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in the case of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE).3 Asymptomatic carriage of ESBL-PE has been associated with more infections, longer hospitalisations, earlier time to death and higher hospital costs.4 5
South East Asian (SEA) countries are known to be a hot spot for AMR.6 However, the region is heterogeneous with varying healthcare standards and antimicrobial stewardship and utilisation policies.7 To aid in designing effective public health policies and engage the community in the campaign against AMR, it is crucial to understand the local knowledge, attitude and practices of antibiotic use. This study aims to correlate the epidemiological and behavioural risk factors of ESBL-PE carriage in Singapore, a high-income country in SEA, as well as delineate the genetic mechanisms associated with these resistant organisms.
Methodology
Study population
The study was carried out in Clementi Township, a densely populated residential area in the west of Singapore. It comprises 27 142 households with 91 630 residents who are sociodemographically comparable to the general Singapore population in terms of age, gender, ethnicity and housing distribution.8 The study team returned to non-responding households for up to three times on separate days to maximise the response rate. The first adult aged above 21 years in each household who responded to the study team was invited to participate in this cross-sectional study; all consenting individuals undertook a questionnaire, while some additionally consented to provide a rectal swab or stool sample. To calculate the number of samples required to estimate the prevalence of ESBL-PE in the community, we used one-sample Z-test with an estimated prevalence of 50%, a CI of 95% and maximum tolerable error of 10%. This yielded about 100 stool samples.
Questionnaire on knowledge, attitudes and practices on antibiotic intake and health-seeking behaviour
We conducted a questionnaire study to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of participants towards antibiotic use. A 40-item questionnaire was developed after performing a thorough literature review of comparable studies.9–14 This was then validated by a pilot study involving 75 community-dwelling volunteers to ensure fluency and accuracy in question design and language. A team of 33investigators was trained to administer the survey face-to-face, in languages that the participants are fluent in with standardised explanations, to ensure consistency.
The questionnaire comprised four main sections. The first covered sociodemographic data and recent antibiotic intake. The second was an assessment of antibiotic consumption practices, in which two hypothetical scenarios of diarrhoea and upper respiratory tract symptoms were presented, and participants were asked if they would visit the doctor should they experience these symptoms for <1 week, if they would expect or insist on an antibiotic prescription from the doctor’s visit, and if they would seek a second opinion if antibiotics were not prescribed. The third component assessed participants’ attitudes and trust towards primary care healthcare providers, and was adapted from a validated questionnaire from Hall et al.15 The last component examined participants’ knowledge on AMR. The full questionnaire and grading system can be found in online supplementary table S1.
bmjopen-2018-023859supp002.pdf (121.1KB, pdf)
Bacterial isolation and antibiotic susceptibility testing
The study team requested fresh stool samples or rectal swabs from all study participants. The samples of those who consented were collected from the participants within 24 hours of production and stored centrally at 0°C–4°C prior to microbiological processing. All sample processing was carried out in the Singapore General Hospital Diagnostic Bacteriology Laboratory. Samples were inoculated onto CHROMagar ESBL and CHROMID CARBA SMART (bioMerieux) media to detect cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. After 24 hours of incubation, growing colonies were subcultured onto sheep blood agar and used for subsequent species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Species identification was done by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker) and the Vitek-2 (bioMerieux) system.
Antibiotic susceptibilities to ampicillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, cefepime, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam, amikacin, nitrofurantoin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, ertapenem and meropenem were assessed by the disc diffusion method and interpreted according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute criteria.16 Enterobacteriaceae isolates that were not susceptible to third-generation/fourth-generation cephalosporins were identified as potential ESBL producers, while those not susceptible to any carbapenem were identified as potential carbapenemase producers. Potential carbapenemase producers were tested phenotypically for carbapenemase production by modified Hodge test and KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit (ROSCO). All potential carbapenemase producers were also subjected to the Xpert Carba-R test (Cepheid) targeting KPC, NDM, OXA-48 like, IMP and VIM carbapenemase gene sequences.
Whole genome sequencing of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae
DNA extraction was performed for all Enterobacteriaceae isolates that are potentially ESBL or carbapenemase producers, with sequencing libraries for each isolate prepared as per manufacturer’s recommendation to be multiplexed sequenced on the Illumina HiSEQ platform generating paired-end sequence reads of 2×150 basepairs, having a data throughput of 1 GB per isolate. De novo assembly of the Illumina reads was performed using the SPAdes Genome Assembler.17 Bacterial species were identified using Kraken,18 comparing with phenotypic results. Multilocus sequence types were determined by a customised script using BLAST search for identification of genotypes at each loci.19 Genotypic prediction of antimicrobial resistance owing to the existence of specific gene sequences were performed using SRST2.20
Statistical analysis
Univariate descriptive analyses are presented for sociodemographics, ESBL-PE or C-PE carriage status and presence of specific resistance genes. Dichotomous variables are expressed in frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables are in means with SD. Categorical variables are compared with χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests and continuous variables with unpaired, two-tailed t-tests or non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests as appropriate. Linear and logistic regressions are used in multivariate analyses to identify statistically significant factors that influence and determine KAP and ESBL-PE carriage. Covariates that were found to be statistically significant in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate models. All tests of significance are performed at α=5%. Statistical analysis was carried out using R V.1.1.383.21
Patient and public involvement
A group of 75 community dwellers partnered with us for the design and validation of the study questionnaire to ensure clarity and accuracy, production of informational material to support recruitment and evaluation of the burden of the sample collection from the patient’s perspective. Because there was no clear preference for the sample collection methodology, the study team decided to offer both options of rectal swab and stool collection to the study participants.
Results
From June 2016 to April 2017, we randomly selected 2200 households in Clementi for home visits. Out of these 2200 households, 693 (31.5%) agreed to participate, of whom 305 (44.0%) also provided stool samples or rectal swabs (online supplementary figure S1). Participant demographics are presented in table 1. The median age of participants was 53 (IQR 38–66). A slight majority were women (393/693, 56.7%). The ethnic distribution of the participants was similar to the wider Singapore population, with 513 (74.0%) Chinese, 78 (11.3%) Malay and 83 (12.0%) Indian. The majority had received at least secondary school education (534/693, 77.0%), and stayed in public housing apartments (661/693, 95.4%). The median number of occupants per household was 3 (IQR 2–4) persons. A quarter (25.3%, 175/693) reported having taken antibiotics in the past 6 months, and 102 (14.7%) had recently been hospitalised in the past 1 year.
Table 1.
Demographics, medical background and antibiotic use of study participants
| Characteristic | N (%) Total n=693 |
| Age (median, IQR) | 53.0 (38.0–66.0) |
| Females | 393 (56.7) |
| Race | |
| Chinese | 513 (74.0) |
| Malay | 78 (11.3) |
| Indian | 83 (12.0) |
| Other ethnicities | 19 (2.7) |
| Education level | |
| Graduate | 88 (12.7) |
| Diploma | 251 (36.2) |
| Secondary | 195 (28.1) |
| Primary | 122 (17.6) |
| No formal education | 37 (5.3) |
| Housing type | |
| One-room, two-room or three-room public housing | 334 (48.2) |
| Four-room or five-room public housing | 327 (47.2) |
| Private landed property | 32 (4.6) |
| Number of occupants in the household | |
| Overall (median, IQR) | 3 (2–4) |
| ≤3 persons | 369 (53.2) |
| 4–5 persons | 257 (37.1) |
| ≥6 persons | 67 (9.7) |
| Comorbidities | |
| Any chronic illnesses | 239 (34.5) |
| Hypertension | 105 (15.2) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 76 (11.0) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 67 (9.7) |
| Recent hospitalisation in the past 1 year | 102 (14.7) |
| Antibiotic consumption | |
| Within past 6 months | 175 (25.3) |
| >6 months ago | 441 (63.6) |
| Never taken antibiotics | 77 (11.1) |
bmjopen-2018-023859supp001.jpg (86.6KB, jpg)
The survey revealed widespread misinformation about antibiotics, with a mean knowledge score of only 4.6 (IQR 3.0–6.0) out of 10 (online supplementary table S2). Although the majority of participants knew that viruses are the most common cause of upper respiratory tract infections, a significant proportion (335/693, 48.3%) believed that antibiotics could be used for viral infections and 385 (385/693, 55.6%) thought that the most common cause of diarrhoea was bacteria. The questionnaire also explored participants’ compliance to the widely accepted view of completing antibiotic courses. The majority (554/693, 79.9%) said they would complete the course of antibiotics prescribed, while 13.7% (95/693) would stop taking antibiotics when they start to feel better, and 6.3% (44/693) preferred to seek the doctor’s opinion before stopping the course. Most participants (564/693, 81.4%) were aware that antibiotics are prescription-only drugs in Singapore, but were unable to correctly answer questions related to AMR, with 82.5% (572/693) not knowing what causes AMR, and 63.2% (438/693) believing AMR was not present in Singapore. Level of education (p<0.001) and staying in larger housing (p=0.037)—the usual proxies for socioeconomic status in Singapore—were independent factors associated with higher total knowledge scores. However, higher knowledge scores were not strongly related to participants’ trust in primary care physicians (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.20) or the expectation of an antibiotic prescription for common viral infections (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.0).
A large majority of the community continued to place trust in their primary care doctors (online supplementary table S3). Most strikingly, 627 participants (627/693, 90.6%) trusted healthcare professionals as their primary source of medical information, over the internet, media and family and friends. There were no significant associations between demographic factors and attitude scores in contrast to the differences seen in knowledge scores.
In the two scenarios (of having an upper respiratory tract infection or diarrhoea and vomiting), although about half of the participants (294/693, 42.4% for cough and runny nose, 414/693, 59.7% for diarrhoea and vomiting) envisioned visiting the doctor for common complaints lasting <1 week, only 18.5% (average 128/693) expected an antibiotic prescription (online supplementary table S4). Were antibiotics not prescribed during the initial visit, very few (average 39/693, 5.6%) reported they would insist on antibiotic prescription or seek a second opinion. The only independent factor associated with the expectation of an antibiotic prescription was younger age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) in multivariate logistic analysis. In dealing with leftover antibiotics, the majority (476/693, 68.7%) declared that they do not have leftovers antibiotics; others reported keeping them for future use (60/693, 8.7%) or disposing with solid waste (130/693, 18.8%) or down the drain (8/693, 1.2%). Only 3.3% (23/693) admitted to having previously shared antibiotics with family members and 5.5% (38/693) to having taken leftover antibiotics from a previous illness.
Asymptomatic carriage of ESBL-PE
Three hundred and five participants (305/693, 44.0%) provided rectal swabs or stool samples for microbiology cultures. The participants who provided stool samples were not significantly different from those who did not, in terms of age, gender and education level. Eighty participants (80/305, 26.2%, 95% CI 21.5% to 31.6%) were found to carry at least one ceftriaxone non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolate. One hundred and fifteen isolates were detected on the ESBL screening media, of which 93 were ceftriaxone resistant or intermediate Enterobacteriaceae. Six bacterial isolates were detected on the CRE screening media, none of which were confirmed to be carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The factors associated with ESBL-PE carriage from multivariate logistic regression analysis were residency overseas for >1 year (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.9), with the most common location being other parts of Asia, scoring higher than 6 on the knowledge component in the questionnaire (OR 2.0 95% CI 1.03 to 3.9) and having no leftover antibiotics (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.9). Interestingly, recent hospitalisation and reported antibiotic intake were not associated with ESBL-PE carriage (table 2).
Table 2.
Univariate analysis of demographic characteristics associated with carriage of ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
| Factors | Total n=305 |
Carriers n=80 |
Non-carriers n=225 | P values |
| Age (median, IQR*) | 54.0 (41.0–65.0) | 56.0 (38.8–66.0) | 54.0 (41.0–65.0) | 0.79 |
| Females (%) | 169 (55.4) | 46 (57.5) | 123 (54.7) | 0.76 |
| Ethnicity (%) | ||||
| Chinese | 237 (77.7) | 67 (83.8) | 170 (75.6) | 0.24 |
| Malay | 28 (9.2) | 3 (3.8) | 25 (11.1) | |
| Indian | 30 (9.8) | 7 (8.8) | 23 (10.2) | |
| Others | 10 (3.3) | 3 (3.8) | 7 (3.1) | |
| Education (%) | ||||
| No formal education | 11 (3.6) | 4 (5.0) | 7 (3.1) | 0.45 |
| Primary | 57 (18.7) | 12 (15.0) | 45 (20.0) | |
| Secondary | 93 (30.5) | 21 (26.2) | 72 (32.0) | |
| Tertiary | 110 (36.1) | 31 (38.8) | 79 (35.1) | |
| Graduate | 34 (11.1) | 12 (15.0) | 22 (9.8) | |
| Housing (%) | ||||
| HDB one-room and two-room | 23 (7.5) | 5 (6.2) | 18 (8.0) | 0.75 |
| HDB three-room | 115 (37.7) | 32 (40.0) | 83 (36.9) | |
| HDB four-room | 98 (32.1) | 24 (30.0) | 74 (32.9) | |
| HDB five-room and executive apartment | 47 (15.4) | 11 (13.8) | 36 (16.0) | |
| Landed property | 22 (7.2) | 8 (10.0) | 14 (6.2) | |
| Pets (%) | 33 (10.8) | 7 (8.8) | 26 (11.6) | 0.75 |
| Number of occupants in the household (mean, SD) | 3.6 (1.6) | 3.6 (1.6) | 3.6 (1.6) | 0.71 |
| Stayed overseas for >1 year (%) | 57 (18.7) | 26 (32.5) | 31 (13.8) | <0.001 |
| Stayed in South, East or Southeast Asia for >1 year (%) | 40 (13.1) | 18 (22.5) | 22 (9.8) | 0.01 |
| Travelled in the past >1 year (%) | 178 (58.4) | 47 (58.8) | 131 (58.2) | 1.0 |
| Travelled in South, East or Southeast Asia in the past 1 year (%) | 163 (53.4) | 43 (53.8) | 120 (53.3) | 1.0 |
| Any chronic illnesses (%) | 127 (41.6) | 33 (41.2) | 94 (41.8) | 1.0 |
| Hospitalisation in the past 1 year (%) | 43 (14.1) | 14 (17.5) | 29 (12.9) | 0.41 |
| Previous antibiotics intake (%) | 282 (92.5) | 76 (95.0) | 206 (91.6) | 0.45 |
| Antibiotics in the last 6 months (%) | 85 (27.9) | 23 (28.8) | 62 (27.6) | 0.61 |
| Knowledge score >6 (%) | 89 (29.2) | 33 (41.3) | 56 (24.9) | 0.01 |
| No leftover antibiotics (%) | 211 (69.2) | 63 (78.8) | 148 (65.8) | 0.04 |
Out of the 93 ceftriaxone-resistant isolates, 17 were cefoxitin resistant, suggestive of AmpC β-lactamase production. Only one Enterobacter cloacae complex isolate was resistant to ertapenem and was of intermediate susceptibility to meropenem (table 3). This E. cloacae complex isolate was not a carbapenemase-producer based on phenotypic and genotypic tests. Eighty-three (83/93, 89.2%) of these ESBL-PE isolates were Escherichia coli. The majority of ESBL-PE remained susceptible to aminoglycosides including gentamicin (80/93, 86.0%) and amikacin (91/93, 97.8%) as well as nitrofurantoin (76/93, 81.7%), while ciprofloxacin (53/93, 57.0%) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (32/93, 34.4%) resistance were more common.
Table 3.
Antibiotic susceptibility of the ceftriaxone-resistant isolates
|
Escherichia coli (n=83) N (%) |
Klebsiella (n=6) N (%) |
Others* (n=4) N (%) |
Total (n=93) N (%) |
|
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 73 (88.0) | 4 (66.7) | 1 (25.0) | 78 (83.9) |
| Cefepime | 35 (42.4) | 3 (50) | 2 (50.0) | 40 (43.0) |
| Aztreonam | 39 (47.0) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (25.0) | 42 (45.2) |
| Amikacin | 82 (98.8) | 5 (83.3) | 4 (100) | 91 (97.8) |
| Gentamicin | 75 (90.4) | 3 (50) | 2 (50.0) | 80 (86.0) |
| Nitrofurantoin | 73 (88.0) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (25.0) | 76 (81.7) |
| Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim | 32 (38.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 32 (34.4) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 48 (57.8) | 4 (66.7) | 1 (25.0) | 53 (57.0) |
| Fosfomycin | 63 (75.9) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 64 (68.8) |
| Ertapenem | 83 (100) | 6 (100) | 3 (75.0) | 92 (98.9) |
| Meropenem | 83 (100) | 6 (100) | 3 (75.0) | 92 (98.9) |
*Others include Enterobacter species (2), Proteus mirabillis (1), Raoultella ornithinolyitca (1).
Molecular classification of ESBL-PE
Eighty (80/93, 85%) ESBL-PE isolates from unique participants underwent whole genome sequencing. When two or more isolates grew from a single subject’s sample, E. coli, the most common species observed, was selected to facilitate comparisons. Genotypic species determination from the sequence reads correlated completely with the results by MALDI-TOF MS or the Vitek-2 system. Seventy-one (71/80, 88.8%) isolates were E. coli, of which the most common molecular type was sequence type (ST) 131 (11/71, 15.5%) (online supplementary table S5). The most frequently observed ESBL gene was CTX-M (62/80, 77.5%), especially CTX-M-15 (21/71, 29.6%) and CTX-M-27 (16/71, 22.5%). E coli ST131 were more resistant to fluoroquinolones than non-ST131 isolates (p=0.041). The only significant factor from the questionnaire associated with ESBL-producing E. coli ST131 carriage was having more children in the household, but the difference was marginal (mean 0.3±0.7 vs 0.8±1.1, p=0.034).
Discussion
We found a significant burden of ESBL-PE carriage (80/305, 26.2%) among healthy community dwellers in Singapore, twice the rate found in an earlier study in 2014 of patients at an emergency department.22 Similar rises have been observed globally.3 Although these figures are lower than the reported prevalence of over 40% faecal carriage with ESBL-PE elsewhere in South and South East Asia, they are much higher than the 1.5%–3% observed in the USA and UK.3 Singapore has a tightly regulated antibiotic prescription system similar to Europe and the USA where only registered medical practitioners are allowed to prescribe antibiotics, and they must be purchased from licensed dispensers. We did not find any association between faecal carriage of ESBL-PE and short-term travel, unlike other studies.23 Singapore is a city-state and overseas travel is very common, making it hard to detect such a relationship when frequent trips to neighbouring countries are made. However, past residency overseas was strongly associated with colonisation, especially those who lived elsewhere in South or South East Asia (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.9). Distinctions should be made in future studies on overseas travels and AMR carriage in terms of duration and frequency of travel, in addition to destinations. The possibility of substantial acquisition of MDRO colonisation and infection through overseas exposure24 25 once again highlights the urgent need for a regional, collaborative approach to tackling the problem of AMR.
In addition, we did not find an association between recent antibiotic intake in the past 6 months and ESBL-PE carriage. This is inconsistent with previous reports showing that consumption of certain classes of antibiotics such as beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones are risk factors for predispositions to ESBL-PE carriage.26 27 The possible reasons could be due to the relatively small number of participants who had recent antibiotic intake (85/305, 27.9%), so we were not able to distinguish the specific classes of antibiotics taken by the participants. It is also possible that the dominance of a hyperendemic community-associated clone rather than antibiotic selection pressure alone contributed to this finding.
Molecular typing of the ESBL-PE isolates from our cohort showed that E. coli ST131 with CTX-M beta-lactamases (11/71, 15.5%) were the most common ESBL mechanism, echoing the global dissemination of this hyperendemic clone, especially in the community.28 Similar reports showed 11.1% (32/287) in China29 and 4.1% (8/193) in Thailand30 have been published. The reason for the rapid worldwide expansion and long-term persistence of E. coli ST131 is thought to be due to compensatory mutations within the core genome counterbalancing the fitness cost associated with IncF plasmids, thus sustaining its spread even in the absence of direct antibiotic selection pressure.31 These E. coli ST131 are not just prevalent colonisers but have also associated with invasive bloodstream infections in hospitalised patients in Australia, New Zealand and Singapore.32 It will be important to better understand the evolutionary ecology and transmission dynamics of this emerging clone.
This study also revealed widespread misconceptions about the utility of antibiotics for viral infections, consistent with the findings of a global survey conducted by WHO in 2015.33 We also found that, the public continues to place trust in their primary care doctors and their recommendations. This dependence on physicians is in contrast to doctors’ perceptions of patient expectations for antibiotic prescriptions.34 This discordance has been previously described and is thought to be due to the lack of empowerment of the patient and the erroneous attribution of patient satisfaction to antibiotic prescription rather than a focus on better patient-doctor communication.35 36
Engaging and educating both the prescribers and the public may reduce inappropriate antibiotic use,37 38 and has been identified as a key strategy by WHO and the UK to tackle AMR.39 40 One of the most striking findings of this study is that having both the knowledge that antibiotic courses should be completed and not having leftover antibiotics is independently associated with the carriage of ESBL-PE. Although these relationships cannot be viewed as causal given the complexities in the emergence and transmission of AMR, there is emerging evidence supporting short course antibiotic therapies, even for severe infections such as bacteraemia, given the collateral damage that antibiotics have on host microbiome.41 The current WHO recommendation remains that full courses of antibiotics should be completed to prevent the onset of resistance.33 Similar messages are advocated in national campaigns launched in Australia,42 the USA43 and Europe.44 Given that the minimum effective treatment durations have not been determined for many infections and that a significant proportion of antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate, the emphasis on completing the course of antibiotics to prevent resistance may have to be re-examined.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that explored antibiotic consumption behaviour with the acquisition of MDRO at a community level. This novel approach has the potential to guide clinicians and policy makers in identifying directly actionable interventions for the population. The main weakness of our study is that the questionnaire data is self-reported and subjected to recall and interviewer biases. We minimised these errors by designing specific questions that are carefully constructed to maximise accuracy and completeness, and all interviewers were trained to adhere to the question and answer format strictly. Further research using antibiotic prescription databases can potentially overcome some of the intrinsic biases arising from cross-sectional questionnaires.
Conclusion
There is a significant burden of asymptomatic ESBL-PE colonisation in Singapore, especially with E. coli ST131 carrying CTX-M. This is correlated with KAP of antibiotic use, especially with the practice of finishing full courses of antibiotics, and prolonged residency in other parts of Asia. Innovative approaches to control AMR that take into account transboundary transmission of resistance and clinical trials to determine the appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy will be critical to control the emergence of these resistant clones, which have contributed significantly to the current global antibiotic resistance crisis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the study team members, Ang Chen Xiang, Anne Goei Hui Yi, Charmaine Loh Hui Yun, Cheong Shao Wei Dominic, Chew Shi Jie, Chong Yvette, Choo Hui Min Charlotte, Choo Xin Yi, Daveraj Sivasegaran, Dean Krishen Sethi, Joshua Tan Teck Chin, Keith Ching Wei Jie, Khoo Chun Yuet, Krystal Khoo Oon Hui, Lai Jieru, Liew Yi Song Terence, Lim Li Liang Joshua, Lok Si Ying Andrea, Lynette Sim Pei Shuen, Michelle Sim Yan Lin, Mok Charlene, Ong Yuxuan Daniel, Ong Zheng Xuan, Quek Keng Liang, R Krishnapriya, Sophia Ng Shuen Yii, Tan Fang Min Grace, Tan Jian Wei, Tan Pei Min Mabelline, Tay Yiling Elaine, Tey Min Li, Wu Yanlin, Zhou Lingyue, for their contributions in carrying out home visits, interviews and sample collections.
Footnotes
YM and IS contributed equally.
Contributors: YM, PT, ARC, IS, PSPL, XLJK and KYMW conceptualised and designed the study. IS, PSPL, XLJK and KYMW conducted the study and collected data. KKKK performed microbiological testing. RTHO planned and conducted genomic sequencing and interpreted the results. YM, ARC, IS, PSPL, XLJK and KYMW performed data analysis. All participated in the writing of the script, and affirm that the manuscript is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted and that any discrepancies from the study as originally planned have been explained. YM and IS accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data and controlled the decision to publish. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
Funding: Data collection was supported from funding from the Infectious Diseases Research Fund, National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (SSHSPH). RT-HO received funding support from the SSHSPH, NUS. ARC was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under the Centre Grant Programme—Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre (NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS).
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: Ethical approval was obtained from National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board (reference number B-16–245).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement: The authors commit to making the relevant anonymised patient-level data available on reasonable request.
Patient consent for publication: Not required.
References
- 1. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. . Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:318–27. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ruppé É, Woerther PL, Barbier F. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacilli. Ann Intensive Care 2015;5:61 10.1186/s13613-015-0061-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Karanika S, Karantanos T, Arvanitis M, et al. . Fecal colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae and risk factors among healthy individuals: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:310–8. 10.1093/cid/ciw283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Reddy P, Malczynski M, Obias A, et al. . Screening for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among high-risk patients and rates of subsequent bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:846–52. 10.1086/521260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Troché G, Joly LM, Guibert M, et al. . Detection and treatment of antibiotic-resistant bacterial carriage in a surgical intensive care unit: a 6-year prospective survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:161–5. 10.1086/502521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Coker RJ, Hunter BM, Rudge JW, et al. . Emerging infectious diseases in southeast Asia: regional challenges to control. Lancet 2011;377:599–609. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62004-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zellweger RM, Carrique-Mas J, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. . A current perspective on antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72:2963–72. 10.1093/jac/dkx260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Singapore Department of Statistics. Singapore Residents by Planning Area/Subzone 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pan DS, Huang JH, Lee MH, et al. . Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infections among patients seeking primary health care in Singapore. BMC Fam Pract 2016;17:148 10.1186/s12875-016-0547-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Scaioli G, Gualano MR, Gili R, et al. . Antibiotic use: a cross-sectional survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices amongst students of a school of medicine in Italy. PLoS One 2015;10:e0122476 10.1371/journal.pone.0122476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Awad AI, Aboud EA. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards antibiotic use among the public in Kuwait. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117910 10.1371/journal.pone.0117910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Huang Y, Gu J, Zhang M, et al. . Knowledge, attitude and practice of antibiotics: a questionnaire study among 2500 Chinese students. BMC Med Educ 2013;13:163 10.1186/1472-6920-13-163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lv B, Zhou Z, Xu G, et al. . Knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning self-medication with antibiotics among university students in western China. Trop Med Int Health 2014;19:769–79. 10.1111/tmi.12322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Teck KC, Ghazi HF, Bin Ahmad MI, et al. . Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Parents Regarding Antibiotic Usage in Treating Children’s Upper Respiratory Tract Infection at Primary Health Clinic in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2016;3:233339281664372 10.1177/2333392816643720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hall MA, Zheng B, Dugan E, et al. . Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers. Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:293–318. 10.1177/1077558702059003004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ljzx.cqrmhospital. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing an informational supplement for global application developed through the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. http://ljzx.cqrmhospital.com/upfiles/201601/20160112155335884.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2018).
- 17. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, et al. . SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012;19:455–77. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 2014;15:R46 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Madden T. Chapter 16, The BLAST Sequence Analysis Tool. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21097/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK21097.pdf (accessed 20 Apr 2018).
- 20. Inouye M, Dashnow H, Raven LA, et al. . SRST2: rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med 2014;6:90 10.1186/s13073-014-0090-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Young BE, Lye DC, Krishnan P, et al. . A prospective observational study of the prevalence and risk factors for colonization by antibiotic resistant bacteria in patients at admission to hospital in Singapore. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:298 10.1186/1471-2334-14-298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. McNulty CAM, Lecky DM, Xu-McCrae L, et al. . CTX-M ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: estimated prevalence in adults in England in 2014. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:1368–88. 10.1093/jac/dky007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tängdén T, Cars O, Melhus A, et al. . Foreign travel is a major risk factor for colonization with Escherichia coli producing CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a prospective study with Swedish volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:3564–8. 10.1128/AAC.00220-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Woerther PL, Andremont A, Kantele A. Travel-acquired ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: impact of colonization at individual and community level. J Travel Med 2017;24:S29–S34. 10.1093/jtm/taw101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Augustine MR, Testerman TL, Justo JA, et al. . Clinical risk score for prediction of extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Bloodstream Isolates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:266–72. 10.1017/ice.2016.292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tumbarello M, Trecarichi EM, Bassetti M, et al. . Identifying patients harboring extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae on hospital admission: derivation and validation of a scoring system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:3485–90. 10.1128/AAC.00009-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Dautzenberg MJ, Haverkate MR, Bonten MJ, et al. . Epidemic potential of Escherichia coli ST131 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009971 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhong YM, Liu WE, Liang XH, et al. . Emergence and spread of O16-ST131 and O25b-ST131 clones among faecal CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli in healthy individuals in Hunan Province, China. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:2223–7. 10.1093/jac/dkv114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Niumsup PR, Tansawai U, Na-Udom A, et al. . Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal carriage of CTX-M-type ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae from a Thai community. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018;37:69–75. 10.1007/s10096-017-3102-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pitout JD, DeVinney R. Escherichia coli ST131: a multidrug-resistant clone primed for global domination. F1000Res 2017;6:195 10.12688/f1000research.10609.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Harris PNA, Ben Zakour NL, Roberts LW, et al. . Whole genome analysis of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from bloodstream infections in Australia, New Zealand and Singapore: high prevalence of CMY-2 producers and ST131 carrying blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-27. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:634–42. 10.1093/jac/dkx466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. World Heal Organ. Antibiotic resistance: multi-country public awareness survey. 2016. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/baselinesurveynov2015/en/ (Accessed 25 Mar 2018).
- 34. Lee TH, Wong JG, Lye DC, et al. . Medical and psychosocial factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in primary care: survey questionnaire and factor analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2017;67:e168–77. 10.3399/bjgp17X688885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Welschen I, Kuyvenhoven M, Hoes A, et al. . Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract symptoms: patients' expectations, GPs' management and patient satisfaction. Fam Pract 2004;21:234–7. 10.1093/fampra/cmh303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Davey P, Pagliari C, Hayes A. The patient’s role in the spread and control of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8 Suppl 2:43–68. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.8.s.2.6.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. McNulty CA, Cookson BD, Lewis MA. Education of healthcare professionals and the public. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67 Suppl 1:i11–i18. 10.1093/jac/dks199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Little P, Stuart B, Francis N, et al. . Effects of internet-based training on antibiotic prescribing rates for acute respiratory-tract infections: a multinational, cluster, randomised, factorial, controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:1175–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60994-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. UK Five Year Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy 2013 to 2018. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244058/20130902_UK_5_year_AMR_strategy.pdf (Accessed 5 Apr 2018).
- 40. World Heal Organ. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/WHO_Global_Strategy_English.pdf (Accessed 5 Apr 2018).
- 41. Llewelyn MJ, Fitzpatrick JM, Darwin E, et al. . The antibiotic course has had its day. BMJ 2017;j3418:j3418 10.1136/bmj.j3418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. NPS MedicineWise. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. 2018. https://www.nps.org.au/medical-info/consumer-info/antibiotic-resistance-the-facts (Accessed 10 Apr 2018).
- 43. Consumer Updates - Combating Antibiotic Resistance. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm092810.htm (Accessed 10 Apr 2018).
- 44. Factsheet for the general public - Antimicrobial resistance. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/antimicrobial-resistance/facts/factsheets/general-public (Accessed 10 Apr 2018).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
bmjopen-2018-023859supp002.pdf (121.1KB, pdf)
bmjopen-2018-023859supp001.jpg (86.6KB, jpg)