Abstract
Background:
The significance and clinical management of Candida colonization of the respiratory tract are ill-defined. We now report the frequency of Candida species from the lower respiratory tract in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT) undergoing bronchoscopy with broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) for pneumonitis post-HSCT.
Methods:
The University of Michigan Clinical Microbiology Lab Database was queried for all respiratory cultures positive for Candida species between 2000–2012. We concurrently performed a retrospective analysis of 515 HSCT recipients with pneumonitis at our institution between 2001–2012.
Results:
During this twelve-year period, there were 2524 unique Candida isolates (78% Candida albicans). Of the 515 HSCT patients with suspected pneumonitis,127 (24.7%) HSCT subjects were culture positive for a fungal pathogen, with Candida species identified in 27 cases (5.2%). When compared with other HSCT subjects, those cultures positive for Candida had significantly increased mortality (p=0.04).
Conclusions:
Candida sp. are commonly cultured from the respiratory tract of HSCT recipients, with increased mortality in affected patients. While there is insufficient evidence for anti-fungal treatment of Candida species colonization, the presence of the yeast may be useful as a surrogate marker of disease severity.
Keywords: Candida, Respiratory Tract Colonization, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Summary for Table of Contents:
Candida species are frequently isolated from respiratory tract cultures. The significance of Candida colonization of the airway remains unknown. We here propose that Candida colonization may be associated with worse outcomes in immunocompromised patients and briefly review the current state of literature in this area.
Introduction
Candida pneumonia in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients is rare 1–3; however, we propose that the clinical implications of Candida isolation from the respiratory tract, particularly in immunodeficient patients, should not be underestimated in regard to increased morbidity or mortality in this particular population. The fungus Candida albicans is considered a member of the normal human oral and gastrointestinal microbiome; however, lower respiratory tract colonization in mechanically ventilated immunocompetent patients has been independently associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, increased risk of ventilator associated pneumonia, and increased length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay 4–6. A small prospective study of immunocompromised patients found increased mortality in patients with respiratory tract colonization 7. We now show, in one of the largest retrospective studies to date of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients, that Candida colonization of the airway is associated with worse outcomes.
Methods
We queried the University of Michigan Clinical Microbiology Lab Database for all respiratory cultures positive for Candida species between 2000–2012 (University of Michigan IRB HUM00105276). Respiratory cultures reviewed included those from sputum, broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, bronchial brushings, washings and biopsies, endotracheal aspirates, and pleural fluid, as well as swabs from the mouth, oropharynx, pharynx or sinuses. Many centers consider C. albicans as “normal oral flora” and do not report it in hospital microbiology cultures for immunocompetent patients unless specifically requested.
We then studied a cohort of 515 HSCT recipients at the University of Michigan between 2001–2012 who had radiographic or clinical evidence of pulmonary dysfunction post-transplant, and underwent bronchoscopy with BAL as clinically indicated for their care (IRB HUM00046894; IRBMED 2001–0234). Subjects were followed for their lifetime, until withdrawal from the study, or until lost to follow up. Pre-HSCT treatment conditioning chemotherapy, stem cell source, donor selection, were administered according to current HSCT guidelines. Unless contraindicated, all transplant recipients received antifungal prophylaxis (fluconazole or voriconazole) and anti-viral prophylaxis according to our center’s clinical practice guidelines. Antifungal and anti-bacterial prophylaxis were given for 100 days post-transplant in allogeneic transplant recipients and until engraftment in autologous recipients. Anti-viral prophylaxis was given for 1-year following transplant in all recipients. All allogeneic transplant recipients additionally received prophylaxis against graft versus host disease (GVHD).
Statistical analyses were performed using Chi Square, Fisher’s Exact, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis measurements. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for all survival analyses with log-rank p-values reported. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 (San Diego, CA). The statistically significant difference between groups was assessed at the level of p < 0.05.
Results:
Over a 12-year period, 2346 respiratory specimens grew Candida species, representing 2524 unique Candida isolates. Just under half of all cultures (40.7%) were obtained from sputum or endotracheal aspirate, 23.7% were bronchoscopically obtained, and 17.1% were from the oral cavity. The remaining 20% was comprised of cultures from pleural, nasal, and sinus sources. Candida albicans (78%) was the most prevalent species, independent of method of collection, followed by Candida glabrata (11%). No other species of Candida comprised more than 5% of isolates. 178 specimens (7.6%) grew two or more distinct morphologies or different species of Candida. Co-colonization with pathogenic bacteria (7.7%) or fungi (2.3%) was infrequent. Thus, we found that Candida species are commonly isolated from respiratory specimens of our hospitalized patients, with C. albicans accounting for over 75% of the isolates.
The HSCT cohort included 331 males and 184 females, of which 81% were allogeneic (45.1% related-donor; 54.9% unrelated-donor) and 19% were autologous transplants. The mean age at the time of transplant was 44.25 years (range: 2 months – 75 years; SD 19.95). The most frequent indications for HSCT were Acute Myeloid Leukemia (22.7%), Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (20.4%), and Multiple Myeloma (10.3%). Additional characteristics of the study group are shown in Table 1. All but two of the patients were followed for greater than one year post-bronchoscopy.
Table 1.
Demographics
| Candida | Non-Candida Non-Pathogenic Fungi | Pathogenic Fungi | Fungal Negative | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=27 | N=57 | N=58 | N=373 | |
| Age, mean years (range) | 44.1 (9.7–67.2) |
45.93 (1.0–69.7) |
49.5 (4.0–75.3) |
44.2 (1.0–72.1) |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 16 | 43 | 42 | 230 |
| Female | 11 | 14 | 16 | 143 |
| Transplant Type | ||||
| Autologous | 8 | 3 | 8 | 79 |
| Allogeneic | 19 | 54 | 50 | 294 |
| Donor Source* | ||||
| Bone Marrow | 2 | 4 | 4 | 42 |
| Peripheral Blood | 25 | 49 | 51 | 313 |
| Cord | 0 | 4 | 3 | 18* |
| *1 Bone Marrow + Cord | ||||
| Intensity | ||||
| Full | 24 | 37 | 39 | 295 |
| Reduced | 3 | 20 | 19 | 78 |
| Mean days to bronchoscopy | 313.4 | 413.5 | 317.3 | 219.5 |
We found that 142/515 (27.6%) HSCT subjects had BAL cultures positive for any fungus, with Candida representing 27 cases (5.2% overall). The most commonly isolated species was C. albicans, followed by C. glabrata. Candida spp. were co-isolated with a pathogenic fungus such as Aspergillus or Pneumocystis in only 4/27 cases. Autologous transplant recipients were significantly more likely than allogeneic transplant recipients to be culture positive for Candida in the first 100 days following transplant (75% vs 21%; p=0.008). As previously stated, all HSCT patients received anti-fungal prophylaxis with fluconazole or voriconazole unless contraindicated for 100 days or until engraftment. 5/27 subjects with Candida on BAL received new or additional treatment dose anti-fungal therapy for at least 24 hours prior to undergoing bronchoscopy. In this Candida positive group, 12/27 patients had known or highly-suspected GVHD at the time of bronchoscopy. Concurrent transbronchial biopsies were obtained in 6/27 patients. Neither Candida species, nor evidence of invasive fungal pneumonia were histologically present on any of the biopsies. 1 returned with findings consistent with GVHD.
For our subsequent analyses, we divided the cohort into 4 groups according to BAL culture results: Candida isolated (n=27), Non-Pathogenic Fungi isolated (Candida negative) (n=57), Pathogenic Fungi isolated (n=58), or Fungal Negative Pneumonitis (n=373). The distinction between pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi was arbitrated by a transplant infectious disease physician (Table 2). The group with “fungal negative pneumonitis” was defined has having BAL cultures free from any fungal growth but inclusive of cultures positive for viral or bacterial pathogens, as well as sterile cultures. There were no differences in three-year survival between subjects who grew any pathogenic or non-pathogenic fungi in their BAL when compared with those who had “fungal negative pneumonitis” (p=0.45). In contrast, those who had Candida isolated from their BAL had significantly increased three-year mortality when compared to patients who had other classically defined “non-pathogenic fungi” (p=0.04; Figure 1a). When compared with the “fungal negative pneumonitis” group, those with Candida showed a trend toward increased mortality (p=0.06). There was no statistical difference in three-year mortality between subjects that had BAL fluid cultures positive for pathogenic fungi and those in which Candida species were cultured (p=0.24; Figure 1b).
Table 2:
Classification of Pathogenic vs Non-Pathogenic Fungi
| Non-Pathogenic Fungi | Pathogenic Fungi |
|---|---|
| Arthrographis sp. | Aspergillus sp. |
| Paecilomyces sp. | Fusarium sp. |
| Mycelia Sterilia | Pneumocystis |
| Cladosporium sp. | Scedosporium sp. |
| Penicillium sp. | Rhizopus sp. |
| Geotrichum sp. | Mucor |
| Saprophytic Mold | Cryptococcus sp. |
| Acremonium sp. | |
| Scopulariopsis sp. | |
| Saccharomyces Cerevisiae | |
| Chaetomium | |
| Bipolaris sp. | |
| Trichoderma | |
| Aureobasidium Pullulans | |
| Malbranchea sp. | |
| Nigrospora sp. | |
| Rhinocladella | |
| Dematiaceous molds | |
| Phialemonium sp. | |
| Phialophora sp. | |
| Alternaria sp. |
Figure 1: Candida isolation from the respiratory tract is associated with increased mortality in immunocompromised patients.
(A) When compared with subjects from which only non-pathogenic fungi were isolated (Candida negative group), those who were culture positive for Candida had significantly increased mortality (p=0.04). (B) There was no statistical difference in mortality between subjects in which a pathogenic fungus was cultured (e.g., Aspergillus, Pneumocystis, Mucor, etc.) and those in which a Candida species was cultured (p=0.24). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for all survival analyses with log-rank p-values reported. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 (San Diego, CA).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize the frequency of Candida colonization in the respiratory tract of a heterogeneous population of immunocompromised patients. Asymptomatic colonization of Candida in the oropharynx is estimated to occur in 20–50% of healthy individuals, with even higher rates seen in hospitalized and immunocompromised patients8–10. While Candida may be frequently isolated from the respiratory tract, it has been well-established that true invasive Candida pneumonia is a rare phenomenon in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients 1,2,11–13. These studies, primarily post-mortem in nature, have shown a poor correlation between positive respiratory cultures and positive histology for invasive Candida infection. Consequently, current guidelines do not recommend treatment of respiratory tract Candida with anti-fungal drugs. Even so, a great deal of clinical uncertainly remains in how to handle respiratory isolation of Candida. In one study, a quarter of ICU physicians stated they would prescribe anti-fungal therapy for an immunocompetent ICU patient with respiratory Candida isolated; the same physicians stated they would be even more aggressive in treating an immunocompromised patient14. Currently, there is no test or threshold able to distinguish between sampling artifact, colonization, or true infection, forcing the clinician to make decisions using clinical judgement.
Recently, a number of animal and human studies have suggested that Candida colonization of the respiratory tract, while not directly pathogenic, may contribute to worse outcomes4–7,15–22 (Table 3). Studies using rat models of C. albicans airway colonization found increased levels of inflammation and prevalence of bacterial pneumonia when compared with controls16,20. Subsequent clinical studies by Hamet et al and Azoulay et al demonstrated associations between Candida colonization of the respiratory tract and longer duration of mechanical ventilation, increased length of ICU and hospital stay, and increased risk of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated immunocompetent patients4,5. Similar studies conducted in immunocompromised patients have demonstrated that multi-colonization of the oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract is associated with an increased risk of invasive Candidiasis18,23 and decreased short term survival7. Additionally, a small Dutch study identified a polymorphism in the Dectin-1 gene which was associated with increased susceptibility to fungal infections in HSCT recipients 24. Subsequent studies have shown a significant association between Candida colonization and the development of acute GVHD in allogeneic HSCT recipients who had Dectin-1 mutations 25,26. To date, no study has been able to establish whether Candida colonization is a marker of disease severity or is capable of being indirectly pathogenic.
Table 3:
Summary of animal and human studies showing relationship between Candida colonization of oropharyngeal or respiratory tract and worse outcomes.
| Study | Study Design & Population | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Immunocompetent Host | ||
| Roux et al. 2009 | Rats intra-tracheally instilled with C. albicans and P. aeruginosa | Respiratory tract C. albicans increased the prevalence of P. aueruginosa pneumonia. |
| Roux et al. 2013 | Rats intra-tracheally instilled with C. albicans, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. aureus | Respiratory tract C. albicans increased lung inflammation and the prevalence of bacterial pneumonia. |
| Tan et al. 2016 | Rats intra-tracheally instilled with C. albicans and Acinetobacter baumanii. | Respiratory tract C. albicans colonization increased the prevalence of A. baumannii pneumonia. |
| Delisle et al. 2008 | Retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected VAP. N=639; 114 with Candida colonization. | Respiratory tract Candida colonization was independently associated with increased hospital mortality. |
| Delisle et al. 2011 | Retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected VAP. N=274; 68 with Candida colonization | Candida respiratory tract colonization was associated with increased ICU and hospital mortality and increased duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay. |
| Azoulay et al. 2006 | Multi-center, prospective, observational study of mechanically ventilated ICU patients. N=803 | Respiratory tract Candida colonization was associated with prolonged ICU and hospital length of stay and increased risk of P. aeruginosa VAP. |
| Williamson et al. 2011 | Prospective observational study in patients with clinical suspicion of VAP. N=595; 21 with Candida colonization. | Respiratory tract Candida colonization was associated with increased levels of systemic inflammation and worse clinical outcomes. |
| Hamet et al. 2012 | Prospective observational study of patients with clinically suspected VAP. N= 323; 181 with Candida colonization. | Respiratory tract Candida colonization was independently associated with increased risk of mortality and multi-drug resistant bacterial pneumonia. |
| Chotirmall et al. 2010 | Prospective observational study of patients with Cystic Fibrosis. N=89; 3916 sputum samples over study period. | Candida colonization predicted occurrence of hospital-treated exacerbations and accelerated rate of decline in body mass index and FEV1. |
| Gileles-Hillel et al. 2015 | Longitudinal study of patients with Cystic Fibrosis. N= 91, 4244 sputum cultures over study period. | Chronic colonization with Candida was associated with lower FEV1 and higher annual rate of decline in FEV1. |
| Immunocompromised Host | ||
| Martino et al. 1994 | Retrospective study of surveillance cultures in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. N=424 | Neutropenic patients with multiple body sites colonized with Candida were at increased risk of disseminated Candida infection. |
| Marr et al. 2000 | Retrospective review of HSCT recipients with surveillance cultures. N= 585; 256 with Candida isolated | Oral Candida colonization was associated with three times increased risk of development of Candidemia. |
| Safdar et al. 2002 | Prospective evaluation of Candida colonization in hospitalized cancer and HSCT patients. N= 193; 89 with respiratory tract colonization. | Patients with Candida colonization of multiple body sites had poor survival compared with those who did not. |
VAP – Ventilator Associated Pneumonia; ICU – Intensive Care Unit; HSCT – Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Despite a large body of literature demonstrating a negative relationship between Candida colonization of the respiratory tract and patient outcomes, the question of whether to treat Candida colonization remains a clinical conundrum. The benefits of prophylactic azoles for the prevention of invasive fungal infections in high-risk HSCT patients has been well-documented,27,28 however studies assessing the utility of colonization eradication in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients are lacking. To date, two retrospective studies of mechanically ventilated ICU patients with Candida colonization have shown conflicting results: one study reported that the use of anti-fungal therapy was associated with significantly reduced development of P. aeruginosa pneumonia, while another study found that patients treated with anti-fungal therapy had higher in-hospital mortality and pneumonia rates.29,30 A prospective, multi-center, non-interventional study conducted in Spain and Italy found that anti-fungal drugs were more likely to be prescribed in the setting of Candida colonization but their use did not alter outcomes.31 Unfortunately, interpretation of the above studies is limited by their non-interventional design and the presence of treatment bias. Designed as a pilot trial for feasibility, the CANTREAT trial is the only prospective study undertaken to better elucidate the effects of anti-fungal treatment.32 The study randomized 89 critically-ill adults with suspected VAP and concurrent Candida colonization to a placebo-controlled design of anti-fungal therapy. This study did not find any differences in inflammatory markers or hospital mortality between the treatment and placebo groups, and was discontinued prematurely due to slow enrollment leading the authors to conclude that a larger trial could not be supported. To our knowledge, no further prospective trials exploring this question have been undertaken. Resultantly, no clear guidelines for the handling of respiratory tract colonization with Candida exist.
Our study has several limitations. The limited sample size of our study prohibited us from performing extensive multi-variate analysis, with only 27 of 515 (5.2%) of BAL positive for Candida sp. Additionally, no data was available on cause of death for patients who died. Even so, this is one of the largest studies to date of HSCT recipients. Another limitation of our study was the potential for patient bias, in which patients too sick to undergo bronchoscopy were not available for analysis, either due to the severity of their pulmonary dysfunction or other clinical features that precluded bronchoscopy. This population of patients would presumably have even higher rates of Candida colonization and worse outcomes.33 Finally, the frequency of Candida colonization in our HSCT cohort was significantly lower than previously reported studies, likely due to the routine use of anti-fungal prophylaxis in the study population.34 Though our study showed worse outcomes in those with Candida isolated from BAL, it is possible that Candida is a surrogate marker of disease severity or a confounding variable in the presence of other conditions such as GVHD or other infection. As such, the observations reported in this study do not support adding anti-fungal therapy for treatment of Candida in the respiratory tract.
Conclusion
We now report the incidence of Candida spp. colonization in the respiratory tract of a heterogeneous population of immunocompromised patients. Our study adds to the growing body of evidence that calls into question whether Candida colonization of the respiratory tract is truly the innocent bystander we have long considered it to be. While there is certainly no evidence at this stage to recommend anti-fungal treatment for colonization, we believe our findings should encourage further, large-enrollment, prospective clinical studies examining the role of Candida colonization as a co-factor for disease progression or as a biomarker for disease severity, particularly in an immunocompromised population.
Acknowledgments
Support: The authors were supported by funding from NHLBI R01-HL121774 (GBH), K23 HL130641 (RPD).
List of Abbreviations:
- (Allo-RD)
Allogeneic Related-Donor
- (Allo-URD)
Allogeneic Matched Unrelated-Donor
- (BAL)
Broncheoalveolar Lavage
- (GVHD)
Graft versus Host Disease
- (HSCT)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
- (ICU)
Intensive Care Unit
- (VAP)
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Footnotes
The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.el-Ebiary M, Torres A, Fabregas N, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from respiratory samples in critically ill, non-neutropenic patients. An immediate postmortem histologic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(2 Pt 1): 583–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haron E, Vartivarian S, Anaissie E, Dekmezian R, Bodey GP. Primary Candida pneumonia. Experience at a large cancer center and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1993;72(3):137–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pendleton KM, Huffnagle GB, Dickson RP. The significance of Candida in the human respiratory tract: our evolving understanding. Pathog Dis 2017;75(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Tafflet M, et al. Candida colonization of the respiratory tract and subsequent pseudomonas ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 2006;129(1):110–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delisle MS, Williamson DR, Albert M, et al. Impact of Candida species on clinical outcomes in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Can Respir J 2011;18(3):131–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hamet M, Pavon A, Dalle F, et al. Candida spp. airway colonization could promote antibiotic-resistant bacteria selection in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(8):1272–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Safdar A, Armstrong D. Prospective evaluation of Candida species colonization in hospitalized cancer patients: impact on short-term survival in recipients of marrow transplantation and patients with hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;30(12):931–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baum GL. The significance of Candida albicans in human sputum. N Engl J Med. 1960;263:70–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vargas KG, Joly S. Carriage frequency, intensity of carriage, and strains of oral yeast species vary in the progression to oral candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(2):341–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dongari-Bagtzoglou A, Dwivedi P, Ioannidou E, Shaqman M, Hull D, Burleson J. Oral Candida infection and colonization in solid organ transplant recipients. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24(3):249–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meersseman W, Lagrou K, Spriet I, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from airway samples in critically ill patients: a prospective, autopsy study. Intensive Care Med 2009;35(9):1526–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kontoyiannis DP, Reddy BT, Torres HA, et al. Pulmonary candidiasis in patients with cancer: an autopsy study. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(3):400–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Masur H, Rosen PP, Armstrong D. Pulmonary disease caused by Candida species. Am J Med. 1977;63(6):914–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Azoulay E, Cohen Y, Zahar JR, et al. Practices in non-neutropenic ICU patients with Candida-positive airway specimens. Intensive Care Med 2004;30(7):1384–1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Delisle MS, Williamson DR, Perreault MM, Albert M, Jiang X, Heyland DK. The clinical significance of Candida colonization of respiratory tract secretions in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2008;23(1):11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Roux D, Gaudry S, Khoy-Ear L, et al. Airway fungal colonization compromises the immune system allowing bacterial pneumonia to prevail. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):e191–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Williamson DR, Albert M, Perreault MM, et al. The relationship between Candida species cultured from the respiratory tract and systemic inflammation in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(3):275–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martino P, Girmenia C, Venditti M, et al. Candida colonization and systemic infection in neutropenic patients. A retrospective study. Cancer. 1989;64(10):2030–2034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marr KA, Seidel K, White TC, Bowden RA. Candidemia in allogeneic blood and marrow transplant recipients: evolution of risk factors after the adoption of prophylactic fluconazole. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(1):309–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roux D, Gaudry S, Dreyfuss D, et al. Candida albicans impairs macrophage function and facilitates Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in rat. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):1062–1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chotirmall SH, O’Donoghue E, Bennett K, Gunaratnam C, O’Neill SJ, McElvaney NG. Sputum Candida albicans presages FEV(1) decline and hospital-treated exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. Chest 2010;138(5):1186–1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gileles-Hillel A, Shoseyov D, Polacheck I, Korem M, Kerem E, Cohen-Cymberknoh M. Association of chronic Candida albicans respiratory infection with a more severe lung disease in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(11):1082–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martino P, Girmenia C, Micozzi A, De Bernardis F, Boccanera M, Cassone A. Prospective study of Candida colonization, use of empiric amphotericin B and development of invasive mycosis in neutropenic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13(10):797–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Plantinga TS, van der Velden WJ, Ferwerda B, et al. Early stop polymorphism in human DECTIN-1 is associated with increased candida colonization in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(5):724–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van der Velden WJ, Plantinga TS, Feuth T, Donnelly JP, Netea MG, Blijlevens NM. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease increases with Candida colonization depending the dectin-1 gene status. Clin Immunol. 2010;136(2):302–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van der Velden WJ, Netea MG, de Haan AF, Huls GA, Donnelly JP, Blijlevens NM. Role of the mycobiome in human acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(2):329–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fleming S, Yannakou CK, Haeusler GM, et al. Consensus guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis in haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, 2014. Intern Med J. 2014;44(12b):1283–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goodman JL, Winston DJ, Greenfield RA, et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(13):845–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nseir S, Jozefowicz E, Cavestri B, et al. Impact of antifungal treatment on Candida-Pseudomonas interaction: a preliminary retrospective case-control study. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(1):137–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lindau S, Nadermann M, Ackermann H, et al. Antifungal therapy in patients with pulmonary Candida spp. colonization may have no beneficial effects. J Intensive Care. 2015;3(1):31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Terraneo S, Ferrer M, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Impact of Candida spp. isolation in the respiratory tract in patients with intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(1):94 e91–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Albert M, Williamson D, Muscedere J, et al. Candida in the respiratory tract secretions of critically ill patients and the impact of antifungal treatment: a randomized placebo controlled pilot trial (CANTREAT study). Intensive Care Med 2014;40(9):1313–1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bayraktar UD, Nates JL. Intensive care outcomes in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. World J Clin Oncol. 2016;7(1):98–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Markowski J, Helbig G, Widziszowska A, et al. Fungal colonization of the respiratory tract in allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a study of 573 transplanted patients. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1173–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

