Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2016 Nov 29;18(24):6336–6339. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03228

Gold-Catalyzed Vinyl Ether Hydroalkynylation: An Alternative Pathway for the Gold-Catalyzed Intermolecular Reaction of Alkenes and Alkynes

Seyedmorteza Hosseyni 1, Courtney A Smith 1, Xiaodong Shi 1,*
PMCID: PMC6430632  NIHMSID: NIHMS1015630  PMID: 27978688

Abstract

In this report, the gold-catalyzed intermolecular reaction of vinyl ethers and terminal alkynes is investigated. Utilizing a triazole gold catalyst lessens gold decomposition in the presence of the vinyl ether and affords an alkynylation product instead of the [2 + 2] product. This protocol has been expanded to include glycal substrates, which undergo a one-pot alkynylation–Ferrier reaction to produce functionalized sugars in moderate to excellent yields with high diastereoselectivity.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1015630-f0001.jpg


Gold-catalyzed alkene and alkyne activation has greatly enriched synthetic research by providing new strategies of bond formation.1 In general, Au(I) cations exhibit increased π-acid reactivity toward alkynes in comparison with alkenes. One illustration of this difference in reactivity is the gold-catalyzed enyne cycloisomerization, which is proven to be a powerful strategy for facile access to complex substrates.2 In particular, the intermolecular enyne cycloisomerization of alkynes and alkenes, as reported by Echavarren and co-workers, produces diversified cyclobutenes.3 This reaction commences with alkene nucleophilic addition to a gold-activated terminal alkyne (Scheme 1A). The final cyclobutene product is formed via ring expansion of a cyclopropane intermediate and subsequent elimination. This reaction is valuable because it enables straightforward access to the cyclobutene skeleton, which is challenging to synthesize using other methods. Moreover, this method has been successfully employed for macrocycle ring formation,4 as well as for the total synthesis of natural products.5 We wondered if using vinyl ethers as the alkene source would afford the analogous cyclobutene product.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Au(I) Catalysis: Intermolecular Reactions of Alkenes and Alkynes

Surprisingly, in sharp contrast to the previously reported [2 +2] cycloaddition pathway, C-2-hydroalkynylation of the vinyl ether was obtained as the dominant product. Herein, we take advantage of the unique stability of TA-Au and report the TA-Au-catalyzed condensation of vinyl ethers and terminal alkynes.6 This represents a divergent pathway of the gold-catalyzed intermolecular alkene–alkyne condensation reaction.

It is important to note that vinyl ethers have yet to be utilized as the alkene source in previous gold-catalyzed intermolecular alkene–alkyne condensations. Compared with regular alkenes, vinyl ethers bear a more electron-rich C=C double bond due to the donation of oxygen’s electron density into the π system. This additional π-electron density may lead to decomposition (e.g., polymerization) of the vinyl ether substrate upon treatment with Lewis acids.7 Furthermore, the high electron density of vinyl ethers may also accelerate [L-Au]+ decomposition.

Our recent study involving the TA-Au-catalyzed enyne cycloisomerization of homopropargyl alcohols and terminal alkynes provides preliminary evidence in support of vinyl ether-promoted decomposition of Au. In this study, we demonstrated that the presence of vinyl ether leads to decomposition of [L-Au]+. However, employing a triazole ligand, and thus a more stabilized gold complex, successfully prevented this catalyst decomposition.8 Therefore, we postulated that the TA-Au catalyst may also be viable in our proposed transformation (Scheme 1B). To begin our investigation, we first evaluated the stability of PPh3AuNTf2 and [PPh3Au(TA-H)]OTf (TA-Au) in the presence of vinyl ether 1a and 2 equiv of terminal alkyne 2a (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Initial Evaluation of Propargyl Ether Synthesis

As shown in Scheme 2, monitoring the reaction with 31P NMR confirmed the quantitative decomposition of PPh3AuNTf2 to form (PPh3)2 Au+ (eq 1).9 Under identical conditions, less than 10% of [PPh3Au(TA-H)]OTf decomposed (eq 2), which highlights the improved stability of the TA-Au catalyst. Furthermore, reactions with either 5% PPh3AuNTf2 (eq 1) or 5% [PPh3Au(TA-H)]OTf (TA-Au) (eq 2) resulted in 100% conversion of the vinyl ether. However, no expected cyclobutene product A was observed. After careful analysis of the reaction mixture, the hydroalkynylation product 3a was identified in both reactions as the only intermolecular condensation product incorporating both substrates.

Encouraged by these preliminary results, we conducted a detailed screening of the reaction conditions (Table 1).

Table 1.

Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms-1015630-t0002.jpg
catalyst time
(h)
conv
(%)
yieldb
(%)
1 3% PPh3AuNTf2 2 100 24
2 3% IPrAuNTf2 2 100 <10
3 3% XPhosAuNTf2 2 100 16
4 3% (ArO)3PAuNTf2c 2 100 44
5 3% (ArO)3PAu(TA-H)OTfc 4 100 54
6 3% (ArO)3PAu(TA-Ph)OTfc 4 100 56
7 3% (ArO)3PAu(TA-Ph)OTfc (1a was added
slowly over 3 h)
6 100 78
8 other tested catalysts (5%): CuI, Cu(OTf)2,
Ga(OTf)3, ZnBr2, HOTf etc.
6 100 trace
9 other tested solvents: toluene, CH3CN, THF, MeNO2 6 100 <50
a

Reaction conditions: Catalyst was added to a solution of 1a (1 mmol) and 2a (2 mmol) in CDCl3 (1.33 mL) and the mixture stirred at room temperature.

b

1H NMR yields were calculated using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.

c

Ar = 2,4-di-tert-butylbenzene.

A small amount of the desired product was formed when PPh3 was employed as the primary ligand (24%; entry 1). However, when an electron-rich, N-heterocyclic carbene ligand (10%; entry 2), or the bulky, electron-rich XPhos (2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl) ligand was used (16%; entry 3), the yield was diminished. Gratifyingly, switching to an electron-deficient phosphite ligand increased the yield to 44% (entry 4). This is likely due to the increased electrophilicity of its gold cation, which may favor the formation of gold acetylide C. The use of triazole–gold further increased the yields, reasonably attributed to the improved stability of the catalyst (entries 5 and 6). Monitoring the reaction via 1H NMR indicated that the dihydropyran underwent self-condensation in the presence of gold. Theoretically, 1a can attack intermediate B to produce undesired products. In support of this binding mode, Jones and co-workers have demonstrated that vinyl ethers can undergo complexation with gold to form η1 or η2 complexes.10

To provide evidence supporting the self-condensation of dihydropyran 1a in the presence of gold, a control experiment was performed in which 1a was reacted with TA-Au in the absence of 2a. 1H NMR monitoring indicated that vinyl ether 1a converts to an uncharacterized dimerization product in the presence of gold. To avoid this self-condensation pathway, 1a was added slowly to the reaction mixture over 3 h. Satisfyingly, this slow addition resulted in an increase in the yield to 78% (entry 7).

It is plausible that the formation of 3a arises from alkyne addition to the oxocarbenium B that is formed in situ. Although an analogous metal-catalyzed hydroalkynylation of iminiums,11 carbonyls,12 and oxoniums13 was previously reported, copper (I/II) salts were not able to promote the transformation. Other metal catalysts and acids also did not produce the desired product 3a (entry 8). These results highlight the exceptional reactivity of the gold catalyst in promoting this challenging transformation. With the optimal conditions in hand, we investigated the scope of the reaction (Table 2).

Table 2.

Substrate Scope of Propargyl Ether Synthesisa,b

graphic file with name nihms-1015630-t0003.jpg
a

Reaction conditions: In a 2 mL vial, gold catalyst (0.03 mmol) was added to a solution of 2a (2 mmol) in CHCl3 (0.70 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred, and 1a (1 mmol) in 0.63 mL of CHCl3 was added dropwise via syringe pump over 3 h. Isolated yields are reported.

b

Ar = 2,4-di-tert-butylbenzene.

Fortunately, this reaction tolerates a wide range of vinyl ethers and alkynes. In evaluating the substrate scope of the alkyne, both electron-deficient (3b,c,l,o) and electron-rich (3d,e,m) aromatic alkynes produced good yields. Using m-diethynylbenzene yielded the monoalkynylation product 3i in 58% yield. The conjugate enyne 3h is also a viable substrate for this reaction, demonstrating the mildness of the conditions. Additionally, aliphatic alkynes bearing cyclopropyl (3f) and cyclopentyl (3g) substitutents can be used. A heteroaromatic-substituted alkyne was also tolerated, as the thiophene alkyne yielded 73% (3j). Concerning the reaction scope of vinyl ethers, both cyclic (3a–j; 3n,o) and linear (3k–m) vinyl ethers afforded moderate yields of the desired product. However, monosubstituted vinyl ethers yielded the product in less than 30% yield, presumably due to their higher reactivity and relatively fast polymerization. Trisubstituted methyl vinyl ethers (3p,q) afforded the highest yield (91–93%) because of the aberrance of side products in comparison with di- and monosubstituted vinyl ethers. However, tetra-substituted vinyl ethers did not produce the desired product due to their low reactivity presumably from steric hindrance. In addition, using furan and benzofuran vinyl ether substrates resulted in low conversion due to the necessary disruption of aromaticity during the reaction. Overall, this reaction tolerated a wide range of alkynes and vinyl ethers.

After evaluating our new findings, we were keen to expand this chemistry to carbohydrate research. In recent years, gold catalysis has played a pivotal role in the development of glycosidation reactions.14 We identified glycals, which contain a vinyl ether functional group, as an excellent substrate to expand our research.

It has been recently reported that a combination of ascorbic acid and Cu(OTf)2 catalyzes the alkynylation and subsequent Ferrier-type elimination of glycal 4a to produce 5a.15 We wondered whether this condition could be applied to unfunctionalized vinyl ethers. To demonstrate the difference in reactivity of 1a and 5a, we subjected 1a and 2a to this previously reported literature condition (Scheme 3). Surprisingly, no alkynylation product 3a was observed under these conditions, and rapid decomposition of 1a was detected via 1H NMR.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Copper-Catalyzed Reactions

These results clearly highlight the enhanced reactivity of the gold catalytic method we have reported. Thus, to expand our reaction scope to include the Ferrier-type elimination of glycals, we subjected various glycal substrates to the optimized catalytic gold conditions. To ensure full conversion of the glycal, we increased the temperature to 70 °C. Rewardingly, moderate to excellent yields of the desired product 5a were observed with only one diastereomer isolated for a majority of the substrates (Table 3). The diastereomeric ratio was determined via 1H NMR, and the relative stereochemistry was assigned on the basis of previous literature reports.16

Table 3.

Substrate Scope of Glycosidation Reactionac

graphic file with name nihms-1015630-t0004.jpg
a

Reaction conditions: In a 2 mL vial, gold catalyst (0.03 mmol) was added to a solution of 2a (2 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (1.33 mL), followed by addition of 4a (1 mmol). The resulting mixture allowed stirring at 70 °C for 4 h. Isolated yields are reported unless otherwise stated.

b

Ar = 2,4-di-tert-butylbenzene.

c

Diastereomeric ratio determined via 1H NMR.

d

1H NMR yield was calculated using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.

As with the reaction of simple vinyl ethers, a wide range of glycals could be used in the reaction. Glycals with −OAc (5a–f), −OBn (5i), or −OBz (5l) at the C-3 position were well tolerated. In addition, utilizing glycals bearing an OTBS substituent at the C-3 position of glycal could also afford the product in good yields (5j–k). Substrates with a methyl group at the C-6 position were used to investigate whether the presence of an OAc substituent at the C-6 position influenced the reaction yield or stereochemistry due to its proximity to the reaction center. The yield of these substrates bearing a C-6-methyl group did not vary considerably (5g,h). Notably, the cholesterol derivative 5m was formed in moderate yield (64%), further illustrating the tolerance of the reaction. However, aliphatic alkynes were not compatible with the glycal transformation under the optimized reaction conditions.

With the substrate scope of the transformation explored, we turned our attention to investigating the mechanism of the transformation. We synthesized gold acetylide E to test whether the intermediate could be used to form the desired product. Vinyl ether 1a and gold acetylide E were subjected to a variety of conditions (Scheme 4). When 1a and 2a were treated with a catalytic amount of HOTf, 1a underwent rapid decomposition and 3a was not observed (eq 1). Treating 1a with a stoichiometric amount (1 equiv) of gold acetylide E resulted in no conversion of the vinyl ether (eq 2). Adding 10% PPh3AuNTf2 and stoichiometric gold acetylide E to 1a resulted in decomposition of both the gold catalyst and vinyl ether with no formation of the desired product (eq 3). Using the triazole gold catalyst (ArO)3PAu(TA-Ph)OTf instead of PPh3AuNTf2 decreased the yield of the reaction due to the reduced reactivity of TA-Au (eq 4). Finally, treating 1a with a combination of 2% HOTf and stoichiometric gold acetylide E afforded the desired product 3a in 65% yield (eq 5).17

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Mechanistic Investigation

These results suggest that gold acetylide is the nucleophile for the observed hydroalkynylation reaction and that residual acid may promote the transformation. There are few instances of this reactivity mode of gold(I) found in the literature.18 Furthermore, the main challenge of this class of reactions is avoiding vinyl ether promoted gold decomposition. This signifies the use of a triazole–gold catalyst, which is inherently more stable, in promoting this challenging transformation.

To conclude, herein we report the efficient reaction of vinyl ethers with terminal alkynes, producing a hydroalkynylation product. The previously reported [2 + 2] product was not observed in any of the studied cases, suggesting a new mechanistic route of this transformation. This reaction was performed under mild conditions and exhibits high functional group tolerance. A mechanistic investigation revealed the in situ generation of HOTf and gold acetylide as key components of the reaction. An alkynylation–Ferrier reaction employing glycals was also realized, producing functionalized glycal derivatives with excellent diastereoselectivity.

Supplementary Material

SI

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the NIH (1R01GM120240–01), NSF (CHE-1362057), and NSFC (21629201) for financial support.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications websiteACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03228.

Materials and methods, compound characterization, and NMR spectra (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).For recent advances in gold catalysis, see:Asiri AM; Hashmi ASK Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 4471–4503.Zheng Z; Wang Z; Wang Y; Zhang L Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 4448.Pflästerer S; Hashmi AS K. Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 1331–1367.Khrakovsky DA; Tao C; Johnson MW; Thornbury RT; Shevick SL; Toste FD Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2016, 55, 6079–6083.Kawai H; Wolf WJ; DiPasquale AG; Winston MS; Toste FD J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 587–593.Ebule RE; Malhotra D; Hammond GB; Xu B Adv. Synth. Catal 2016, 358, 1478–1481.Johnson JS; Chong E; Tu KN; Blum SA Organometallics 2016, 35, 655–659.Gillie AD; Reddy RJ; Davies PW Adv. Synth. Catal 2016, 358, 226–239.Mokar BD; Huple DB; Liu R-S Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2016, 55, 11892–11896.McCallum T; Barriault L Chem. Sci 2016, 7, 4754.Pirovano V; Arpini E; Acqua MD; Vicente R; Abbiati G; Rossi E Adv. Synth. Catal 2016, 358, 403–409.Lempke L; Ernst A; Kahl F; Weberskirch R; Krause N Adv. Synth. Catal 2016, 358, 1491–1499.Hosseyni S; Ding S; Su Y; Akhmedov NG; Shi X Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 296–299.Jin S; Jiang C; Peng X; Shan C; Cui S; Niu Y; Liu Y; Lan Y; Liu Y; Cheng M Org. Lett 2016, 18, 680–683.Dorel R; Echavarren AM Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 9028–9072.Lu Z; Han J; Hammond GB; Xu B Org. Lett 2015, 17, 4534–4537.
  • (2).For recent examples of enyne cycloisomerizations, see:Chen C; Zou Y; Chen X; Zhang X; Rao W; Chan PWH Org. Lett 2016, 18, 4730–4733.Chen G-Q; Fang W; Wei Y; Tang X-Y; Shi M Chem. Sci 2016, 7, 4318–4328.Harris RJ; Widenhoefer RA Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 4533–4551.Calleja P; Pablo O; Ranieri B; Gaydou M; Pitaval A; Moreno M; Raducan M; Echavarren AM Chem. - Eur. J 2016, 22, 13613–13618.Asiri AM; Hashmi ASK Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 4471–4503.Thummanapelli S; Hosseyni S; Su Y; Akhmedov N; Shi X Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 7687–7690.
  • (3).For recent and original works on gold-catalyzed [2 + 2] reaction of alkyne and alkene, see:de Orbe E; Echavarren AM Org. Synth 2016, 93, 115–126.Obradors C; Echavarren AM Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 902–912.Homs A; Obradors C; Leboeuf D; Echavarren AM Adv. Synth. Catal 2014, 356, 221–228.Muratore ME; Homs A; Obradors C; Echavarren AM Chem. - Asian J 2014, 9, 3066–3082.López-Carrillo V; Echavarren AM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 9292–9294.
  • (4).Obradors C; Leboeuf D; Aydin J; Echavarren AM Org. Lett 2013, 15, 1576–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Ranieri B; Obradors C; Mato M; Echavarren AM Org. Lett 2016, 18, 1614–1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Recent publications on TA-Au catalysis:Motika ES; Wang Q; Akhmedov NG; Wojtas L; Shi X Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2016, 55, 11582–11586.Yang Y; Qin A; Zhao K; Wang D; Shi X Adv. Synth. Catal 2016, 358, 1433–1439.Hosseyni S; Su Y; Shi X Org. Lett 2015, 17, 6010–6013.
  • (7).(a) Aoshima S; Yoshida T; Kanazawa A; Kanaoka SJ Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem 2007, 45, 1801–1813. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hashmi ASK; Schäfer S; Göker G; Eisenbach CD; Dirnberger K; Zhao-Karger Z; Crewdson P Aust. J. Chem 2014, 67, 500–506. [Google Scholar]; (c) Nzulu F; Telitel S; Stoffelbach F; Graff B; Morlet-Savary F; Lalevée J; Fensterbank L; Goddard JP; Ollivier C Polym. Chem 2015, 6, 4605–4611. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Hosseyni S; Wojtas L; Li M; Shi XJ Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 3994–3997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Zhdanko A; Ströbele M; Maier ME Chem. - Eur. J 2012, 18, 14732–14744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).(a) Sriram M; Zhu Y; Camp AM; Day CS; Jones AC Organometallics 2014, 33, 4157–4164. [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhu Y; Day CS; Jones AC Organometallics 2012, 31, 7332–7335. [Google Scholar]; (c) Mazzone G; Russo N; Sicilia E Organometallics 2012, 31, 3074–3080. [Google Scholar]; (d) Roithová J; Janková S; Jaŝíková L; Váňa J; Hybelbauerová S Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2012, 51, 8378–8382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).(a) Yin L; Otsuka Y; Takada H; Mouri S; Yazaki R; Kumagai N; Shibasaki M Org. Lett 2013, 15, 698–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Han J; Xu B; Hammond GB J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 916–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gommermann N; Koradin C; Polborn K; Knochel P Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2003, 42, 5763–5766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).(a) Trost BM; Bartlett MJ; Weiss AH; Wangelin AJ; Chan VS Chem. - Eur. J 2012, 18, 16498–16509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Trost BM; Quintard D Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2012, 51, 6704–6708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Takita R; Fukuta Y; Tsuji R; Ohshima T; Shibasaki M Org. Lett 2005, 7, 1363–1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Frantz DE; Fässler R; Carreira EM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122, 1806–1807. [Google Scholar]; (e) Frantz DE; Fässler R; Carreira EM J. Am. Chem. Soc 1999, 121, 11245–11246. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).(a) Watson MP; Maity P Synlett 2012, 23, 1705–1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Maity M; Srinivas HD; Watson MP J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 17142–17145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).For gold catalyzed reactions in carbohydrate research see:Zhu Y; Shen Z; Li W; Yu B Org. Biomol. Chem 2016, 14, 1536–1539.Shen R; Cao X; Laval S; Sun J; Yu BJ Org. Chem 2016, 81, 10279–10294.Liu W; Chen Q; Liang J; Du Z; Zhang K; Zheng X; O’Doherty GA Synlett 2015, 26, 1683–1686.Roy R; Rajasekaran P; Mallick A; Vankar YD Eur. J. Org. Chem 2014, 2014, 5564–5573.Adhikari S; Baryal KN; Zhu D; Li X; Zhu J ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 57–60.Tang Y; Li J; Zhu Y; Li Y; Yu BJ Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 18396–18405.McKay MJ; Nguyen HM ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1563–1595.Kayastha AK; Hotha S Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 7161–7163.
  • (15).Kusunuru AK; Tatina M; Yousuf SK; Mukherjee D Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 10154–10156.For additional examples of Cu/ascorbic acid catalysis, see:Knöpfel TF; Zarotti P; Ichikawa T; Carreira EM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 9682–9683.Knöpfel TF; Carreira EM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 6054–6055.
  • (16).(a) Reddy TR; Rao DS; Kashyap S RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 28338–28343. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tatina MB; Kusunuru AK; Yousuf SK; Mukherjee D Org. Biomol. Chem 2014, 12, 7900–7903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Devari S; Kumar M; Deshidi R; Rizvi M; Shah BA Beilstein J. Org. Chem 2014, 10, 2649–2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Vieira AS; Fiorante PF; Hough TLS; Ferreira FP; Lüdtke DS; Stefani HA Org. Lett 2008, 10, 5215–5218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Grirrane A; Garcia H; Corma A;Álvarez E ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Obradors C; Echavarren AM Chem. - Eur. J 2013, 19, 3547–3551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES