Significance
Our article examines the relationship between the population size of Cahokia, one of the most significant archaeological sites in North America, and evidence for major flooding and drought events. We use changes in the concentrations of fecal molecules contained in lake sediment as a proxy of population change and directly compare these variations with paleoenvironmental data from the same sediment core. These data show that a shift to decreased summer precipitation and a Mississippi River flood occurred circa 1150 CE, coinciding with a decline in the region’s population and a major climate transition. Our study highlights the importance of multiple, concurrent environmental stressors in combination with societal tensions as contributors to sociopolitical change.
Keywords: Cahokia, fecal stanols, paleodemography, paleoclimate
Abstract
A number of competing hypotheses, including hydroclimatic variations, environmental degradation and disturbance, and sociopolitical disintegration, have emerged to explain the dissolution of Cahokia, the largest prehistoric population center in the United States. Because it is likely that Cahokia’s decline was precipitated by multiple factors, some environmental and some societal, a robust understanding of this phenomenon will require multiple lines of evidence along with a refined chronology. Here, we use fecal stanol data from Horseshoe Lake, Illinois, as a population proxy for Cahokia and the broader Horseshoe Lake watershed. We directly compare the fecal stanol data with oxygen stable-isotope and paleoenvironmental data from the same sediment cores to evaluate the role of flooding, drought, and environmental degradation in Cahokia’s demographic decline and sociopolitical reorganization. We find that Mississippi River flooding and warm season droughts detrimental to agriculture occurred circa (ca.) 1150 CE and possibly generated significant stress for Cahokia’s inhabitants. Our findings implicate climate change during the Medieval Climatic Anomaly to Little Ice Age transition as an important component of population and sociopolitical transformations at Cahokia, and demonstrate how climate transitions can simultaneously influence multiple environmental processes to produce significant challenges to society.
The Cahokia archaeological complex became the largest prehistoric population center in the United States early in the second millennium CE (Common Era), but the site was principally abandoned within several centuries (1, 2). Explanations for the exodus from the region largely focus on environmental and sociopolitical factors and draw from a wide range of geological, paleoclimatological, and archaeological evidence. Environmental explanations include multidecadal drought (3, 4), changes in seasonal precipitation (5), changes in the magnitude and frequency of Mississippi River flooding (6), environmental degradation via deforestation (7, 8) and resource overexploitation (9). Social explanations primarily focus on political collapse, internal factionalization, and economic decline (2, 10–13).
Despite decades of work, the relationship between the environment and Cahokia’s decline has remained unclear. Previous studies could not directly compare environmental stressors and environmental degradation with Cahokia-region population because the population reconstructions were based on separate studies that relied on ceramic chronologies and archaeological data sets, whereas the paleoenvironmental analyses were tied to dendrochronology (3, 4) or calibrated radiocarbon dates that have significant uncertainties (5, 6). Chronological uncertainties between population and environmental reconstructions derived from independent age models, in addition to geographical differences between study sites, limit the confidence in such comparisons and render potential conclusions equivocal.
Pauketat and Lopinot (14) estimated population for Cahokia by extrapolating from excavations in two centrally located areas of the site, and Milner (2) formed models of Cahokia-region population change using architectural data derived from excavations in more than five centrally located areas within the site. Although the population sizes estimated by these two studies differ, both studies concluded that the highest population at Cahokia occurred during the Lohmann phase, c. 1050–1100 CE. Furthermore, Pauketat and Lopinot (14) estimated that the population at Cahokia during the Lohmann phase was five to 10 times higher than in the preceding century and a half, and that it did not decline to pre-Mississippian levels until the 14th century.
This study directly compares reconstructions of Cahokia-region population change inferred from fecal stanol concentrations (15) with changes in hydroclimate inferred from oxygen-isotopic analysis and grain size within two cores, HORM12 and 15HSL, from Horseshoe Lake, an oxbow lake on the Mississippi River floodplain in southern Illinois (Fig. 1). The lake contains within its watershed the Cahokia Mounds Historic Site (UNESCO No. 198), a massive mound complex and major prehistoric population center. By comparing demographic reconstructions and paleoenvironmental data from the same core, changes in the region’s population size and environment can be evaluated on the basis of stratigraphic information, eliminating timing uncertainty related to age dating techniques.
Fig. 1.
Cahokia region and Horseshoe Lake watershed, shown as the black dashed line. Dark brown colors indicate higher topography, principally the river bluffs, and the yellow indicates the Mississippi River floodplain. Coring sites are indicated by red stars. The Cahokia complex is approximated by the large circle around black rectangles showing the position of some of the mounds at the site. Black dots show the locations of other sites with mounds within the Horseshoe Lake watershed that were occupied contemporaneously with Cahokia [∼1000–1400 CE (2)]. Base map elevation data are derived from the National Elevation Dataset (57).
Environmental Hypotheses for Cahokia’s Population Decline
Multiple hypotheses for Cahokia’s sociopolitical reorganization have been presented that focus on environmental changes. The environmental degradation hypothesis argues that wood overexploitation and agricultural ground clearing increased watershed erosion and possibly led to flooding, standing water, and saturated soil conditions through higher sedimentation rates (8, 16). In the flooding hypothesis, Munoz et al. (6) identified multiple Mississippi River flood events from HORM12 grain size data and proposed that an increase in the frequency of high-magnitude floods after several centuries without major floods played a synergistic role in Cahokia’s decline in concert with economic, social, and political changes. One of the largest events, flood event V, has a modeled median age of ca. 1160 CE, and Munoz et al. (6) postulated that this flood occurred at the onset of Cahokia’s depopulation and sociopolitical reorganization.
Other hypotheses suggest that changes in hydroclimate, including multidecadal droughts (4, 17) and shifts in the seasonal distribution of precipitation (5), made agricultural untenable for a large population. Benson et al. (4, 17) used two tree-ring inferred Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) reconstruction records from Illinois and Missouri to postulate that a series of long and severe droughts affected prehistoric North American populations. They contend that Cahokia emerged during an unusually wet 11th century, but suffered from several long and intense droughts that began at ∼1150 CE (4).
In the seasonality of precipitation hypothesis (5), variations in the isotopic composition of endogenic carbonate from Martin Lake in northeastern Indiana are interpreted as responding to changing precipitation source and seasonality as the region transitioned out of the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (MCA) and into Little Ice Age (LIA) conditions. In this hypothesis, high δ18O values of the 11th and 12th centuries indicate regional rainfall dominated by summer moisture advected from the Gulf of Mexico. Lower δ18O values of the early 13th century represent a shift to a Pacific moisture source, with precipitation advected from the northwest across the Rocky Mountains during winter storms, and thus having a signal depleted in 18O (5). As summer precipitation is crucial to maize agriculture, on which Mississippian cultures depended, Bird et al. (5) argued that the higher summer precipitation in the 11th and early 12th centuries was conducive to population growth, whereas a reduction of summer rainfall in the late 12th and 13th centuries led to warm season droughts that limited agricultural production. However, Martin Lake is 500 km to the northeast of Cahokia, and may have a different climatic history, making extrapolation from that isotopic record to Cahokia tenuous.
Methodological Background
Fecal stanols, notably coprostanol and epicoprostanol, are organic molecules that originate in the guts of humans and may persist in sediment for hundreds to thousands of years (18). Fecal stanols deposited in sediment provide evidence of trace human waste products, and are used as a proxy for measuring population change over time (15, 19). Although other mammals, including dogs, donkeys, seals, horses, goats, and cattle, produce coprostanol, only sheep and pigs are known to generate sufficient quantities that could mask changes in human stanol concentration (20–23), and neither domesticate was present in the Cahokia area before Euroamerican settlement (24). White et al. (15) demonstrated the validity of this approach by producing a 1,200-y record of Cahokia region population change through fecal stanol analysis of Horseshoe Lake sediment that parallels population trends identified by previous demographic reconstructions derived from archaeological evidence (2, 14). Because smaller sites contemporary with Cahokia’s occupation are present in the watershed (2), and the proximity of a population to drainages and the lake may affect the amount of fecal stanols at each coring site, the Horseshoe Lake fecal stanol record (15) captures population change at the watershed level. However, Cahokia is the most likely candidate for controlling the lake’s fecal stanol signature because HORM12 and 15HSL show parallel trends; the stanol trends in both cores closely track the Cahokia population estimates of previous demographic reconstructions (2, 14); the footprint of Cahokia’s inhabitants on the landscape likely expanded throughout much of the watershed through activities such as hunting, fishing, and gathering; modern hunter-gatherers (25) and rural farmers (26) without sewage systems frequently practice open defecation away from their homes, where much of their daily activities take place; archaeological surveys around Horseshoe Lake show fewer Mississippian Lohmann phase sites, c. 1050–1100 CE, compared with sites from the preceding century and a half, whereas within the watershed, the numbers of Lohmann phase sites and sites from the preceding phase are similar, which is evidence of shifting settlement locations associated with the rise of Cahokia (27, 28); and Cahokia is the largest archaeological site in the watershed, followed by the East St. Louis Mound precinct near the watershed’s southwest corner (29).
To account for variations in degradation rate and low stanol abundance, the concentrations of coprostanol are reported in comparison with 5α-cholestanol, following Grimalt et al. (30), as a ratio of coprostanol to coprostanol and 5α-cholestanol. 5α-cholestanol is formed from the degradation of cholesterol by soil microbial communities (21). By relating coprostanol to 5α-cholestanol, we make a comparison of stanol input and preservation in a specific environment (5α-cholestanol) with stanol input from feces (coprostanol). Thus, high values of the stanol ratio indicate a large presence of humans in the region, and low values indicate a small human presence. Stanol data from two Horseshoe Lake cores, HORM12 and HSL15 (Fig. 1), indicate that the regional population rose rapidly in the 10th century CE to a maximum early in the 11th century (15). The watershed’s population was in decline by the 12th century, and dwindled to a population minimum at ∼1400 CE.
Reconstructions of hydroclimate from the lake sediments are based on δ18O values of endogenic carbonates (δ18Oc), which in turn reflect changes in the δ18O value of the lake water (SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2). Decreases in δ18Oc values are often attributed to increases in effective moisture (precipitation minus evapotranspiration), which may be related to either increased precipitation and/or decreased evapotranspiration (31). However, in the midcontinental United States, intra-annual variations in the isotopic value of precipitation result in winter snows having more negative δ18O and summer rains having more positive values. This difference is partly a result of variations in temperature (32–34) and partly variations in source region, with Pacific and Arctic air masses contributing to negative isotopic values in winter (35–37). Because the δ18O value of river and lake water is determined by the weighted annual means of precipitation (38), shifts in the seasonal distribution of precipitation can also affect the δ18Oc (5, 39). The δ18Oc can also be affected by the residence time of the lake water. Long residence time, commonly associated with hydrologically closed basins, can amplify the evaporative concentration of 18O. Thus, changes between open/closed status can influence the isotopic record (40).
Variations of sediment grain size in flood plain lakes can be linked to overbank flood events that transport and deposit the suspended load of the river into the lake, leaving an event bed with distinct compositional and geochemical properties (41, 42). Munoz et al. (6) identified a series of Mississippi River flood events through grain size distribution in sediment cores from Horseshoe Lake and another oxbow lake further downstream. We compare these paleoenvironmental data (5, 6) and fecal stanol data (15) within the same stratigraphic profile to produce interpretations that are independent of absolute chronology and temporal uncertainties associated with radiocarbon dating.
Results and Discussion
The sedimentary evidence for environmental and climatic changes in Horseshoe Lake, when combined with the stanol record from the same sediment archive, permits robust tests of environmental hypotheses proposed for sociopolitical and demographic changes at Cahokia. These hypotheses focus on environmental degradation and disturbance, through increased watershed erosion or flooding, and hydroclimate variation, through multidecadal droughts or changes in the seasonality of precipitation.
Environmental Degradation and Disturbance.
Lopinot and Woods (16) and Woods (8) proposed that environmental degradation played a major role in Cahokia’s population decline, through deforestation and subsequent increased watershed erosion. However, palynological data indicate that much of the native forest was cleared at ∼450 CE (43), well before Cahokia’s population maximum in the 11th century. Although increased soil erosion is not the only cause of increased detrital mineral flux, it is anticipated that mineral content and mass accumulation rates would be higher during periods of maximum catchment disturbance related to mound building and agriculture. Mass accumulation rates of detrital minerals in HORM12 (43) are highest, predating the population maximum as defined by the fecal stanols, and drop abruptly in the 10th century. Mass accumulation rates are actually lowest during the population maximum and increase slowly as population declined (Fig. 2). Thus, increased soil erosion seems to occur as the region is depopulated, rather than immediately before. Although not definitive, this relationship suggests that if a link exists between anthropogenic disturbance and population dynamics, it is complex.
Fig. 2.
HORM12 fecal stanol data (A) in relation to HORM12 flood events (6) (B), HORM12 loss-on-ignition-derived mineral content (43) (C), and HORM12 mass accumulation rates (56) (D).
Natural disturbance caused by Mississippi River floods may have contributed to Cahokia’s social reorganization and depopulation. HORM12 fecal stanol values indicate a population maximum before flood event V of Munoz et al. (6), whereas after the flood, the fecal stanol ratio is lower than at any preceding time in the record (Fig. 2). The stratigraphic position of the decline in fecal stanols relative to the flood supports Munoz et al.’s (6) association between the timing of massive flooding of the Mississippi River and late 12th century sociopolitical changes in the Cahokia area that are indicated by evidence for regional population decrease, agricultural contraction, palisade construction, a significant reduction in the creation of new mounds, final capping of some mounds, catastrophic abandonment of some sites, and the reorganization of residential space at Cahokia (2, 11, 13, 29, 43). The majority (∼70%) of historical flood crests on the Mississippi River at Saint Louis (adjacent to Cahokia) occur in April–June, when crops are particularly sensitive to moisture and temperature (44, 45). Floodwaters on low-gradient rivers such as the Mississippi recede gradually over days or weeks, amplifying the effect of inundation on croplands. Although an increase in the fecal stanol ratio from 100 to 50 cm indicates the population may have increased in the mid-16th to mid-18th centuries, it is unlikely that floods had a significant effect on these later populations because protohistoric and early historic groups in the region, such as the Tamaroas, were semisedentary; maize agriculture was less central to their subsistence than Mississippian groups; and they used the landscape in a different way than Mississippians (46, 47).
Hydroclimate Variation.
Despite the detailed information provided by both tree ring reconstructed PDSI measurements (4, 17) and δ18O values of endogenic carbonate from Martin Lake in Indiana (5), the direct relationship between hydroclimate and Cahokia’s regional population change has been obscured by chronological uncertainties of the associated age models and, in the case of Lake Martin, by distance to Cahokia. We present δ18Oc data from 15HSL as a proxy of hydroclimate to evaluate Benson et al.’s (4, 17) and Bird et al.’s (5) climate change hypotheses in relation to changes in Cahokia region population, as interpreted from fecal stanol data. We measured δ18Oc values on 44 15HSL sediment samples with multiple replicates. δ18O values ranged from −9.3‰ to −6.05‰ (SI Appendix, Table S1). Carbonates are not present in sufficient concentration for isotope analysis between 12 and 82 cm in 15HSL; thus, δ18O values provide only a partial picture of regional hydroclimatic change. δ18O values are moderately high during Cahokia’s population maximum and the initial drop from its peak (230–240 cm), alternating between approximately −6.5‰ and −7.5‰ (Fig. 3). δ18O values then rapidly decline to approximately −8.0‰ to −9.0‰ during Cahokia’s depopulation. The low δ18O values are interrupted by a positive excursion between 217 and 220 cm in core depth at the base of flood event V, and may signal the influx of river water with a different isotopic composition. Values remain low (average, approximately −8.5‰) from 217 to 187 cm (ca. 1150–1250 CE) before increasing steadily to a maximum value of −6.05‰ during Cahokia’s regional population low.
Fig. 3.
15HSL fecal stanol data (blue) plotted against 15HSL δ18O data (orange). The horizontal lines mark a period of limited warm season precipitation, as interpreted from negative δ18O values.
The low values of δ18Oc during the population decline at Cahokia can be interpreted in multiple ways: as an increase in effective moisture; reduction in hydrologic residence time of the lake water, and hence a decrease in the evaporative modification of the lake water; or a shift in the mean weighted isotopic value of the lake water, resulting from a shift to more negative winter precipitation values. All these can work independently or in combination; however, any viable interpretation of the HSL δ18Oc record must be consistent with other proxy data. Tree ring reconstructions of PDSI from north and south of Cahokia show three multidecadal droughts from ∼1125 to 1250 CE (4). Modern tree growth in southern Illinois occurs primarily in the late spring and summer (48). The tree ring records that form the basis of PDSI reconstructions also reflect late spring and summer seasonality (4). We expect droughts of the magnitude described by Benson et al. (4) to be recorded as more positive δ18O values in the carbonates of Horseshoe Lake during Cahokia’s population decline, as evaporative modification of the lake water preferentially removes 16O.
However, the droughts are coincident with a marked decrease and sustained low δ18Oc values. To sustain low δ18O values during droughts requires either that the lake became hydrologically open to the Mississippi River or that the weighted δ18O value of the lake water decreased substantially. Maps reconstructed by Milner (2) indicate that in the early 19th century, Horseshoe Lake was connected by a tie channel to the Mississippi River and to other lakes in the floodplain. An isotopic measurement from the 19th century (SI Appendix, Table S1), when the lake was open to the Mississippi River, is similar to isotopic values from the peak population in the 11th century and the population minimum in the 15th century, suggesting that if a tie channel was present through the 19th century, it did not reduce the residence time of the lake water enough to decrease the δ18O value to that seen in the period of the population decline.
Alternatively, a shift in the relative contribution of winter precipitation is compatible with the model proposed by Bird et al. (5). The low δ18Oc values during population decline are similar in timing and duration to an initial decrease in δ18Oc at Martin Lake (Fig. 4). While acknowledging uncertainties from different chronologies, δ18O values from both sites are relatively high in the 11th and early 12th centuries CE, but reach a minimum in the early 13th century. δ18O values increase out of the 13th century and reach higher values in the 14th century, after which the two records decouple.
Fig. 4.
Fecal stanol data (A and B) plotted against North American temperature reconstruction (C) (53), HORM12 flooding events (D) (6), regional PDSI reconstruction (E) (4), δ18O data from 15HSL (F) and Martin Lake (G) (5), and HORM12 mineral content (H) (43). The chronology was established by Munoz et al. (43); time in calendar years (CE) is plotted from older (Left) to younger (Right). The erections of palisades are marked by dashed vertical lines (4, 13).
The coincidence of decreasing stanol values (i.e., diminishing population size) with lower 15HSL δ18Oc values is consistent with Bird et al.’s (5) and Benson et al.’s (4) hypotheses that growing season drought was detrimental to maize agriculture, and thus the Cahokia population (Fig. 4). Seasonal drought documented in the PDSI reconstruction is consistent with changes to the seasonality of precipitation outlined by Bird et al. (5); drought in reconstructed PDSI reconstructed from tree rings coincides with a dominance of winter precipitation and loss of spring/summer rains inferred from the isotope data. The correlation of high fecal stanol and δ18O values at Horseshoe Lake supports Bird et al.’s (5) hypothesis that more positive δ18O values during the MCA represent climatic conditions conducive to supporting large Mississippian populations in the midcontinent.
The transition of 15HSL δ18O to more negative values occurred at ∼1150 CE (Fig. 4). The timing of this shift is significant because Benson et al.’s negative PDSI excursion and Munoz et al.’s (6) flood event V also took place at that time. After lows in the 13th century, δ18O values increase to a maximum at ∼1400 CE, despite a continued decline of fecal stanols. The increase in δ18O values may indicate a return to enhanced summer precipitation. Although this initially corresponds to a slight increase in δ18O values at Martin Lake, the lake shows a second century-long decrease (∼1375–1425 CE) that is delayed by several decades in the 15HSL record. The decoupling of the records can be explained by regional climatic variation, uncertainties in chronologies, or evaporative enrichment of Horseshoe Lake carbonates from a potential closure of the basin overpowering the effect of precipitation source.
MCA to LIA Transition Hypothesis.
The effect of climate change on human populations during the MCA and LIA is well documented worldwide (49–52). Previous studies (5, 6) noted that Cahokia developed during the warm MCA, but did not compare temperature reconstructions with a robust population proxy and other paleoenvironmental indicators. Cahokia’s population maximum coincided with warm reconstructed North American mean temperatures (53) during the 11th century. Temperature and fecal stanol values then decrease in unison until the 13th century (Fig. 4). The correlation of reconstructed North American mean temperatures and Horseshoe Lake fecal stanol trends implies that large-scale climate variability is an important contributor to population change at Cahokia.
Notably, the transition appears to have occurred rapidly and uniformly, as δ18O values, grain size, and tree-ring data all underwent major changes at ∼1150 CE. Thus, a major flood and reduced warm season precipitation occurred at the same time. Perhaps one environmental change would not have been consequential, but a combination of two or more changes would have presented significant challenges for a centralized, agrarian social system. Around this time, the inhabitants of Cahokia constructed a series of palisades that have been interpreted as indicators of societal stress (13), and several other lines of evidence indicate that there was a reorganization of Cahokia’s sociopolitical structure, including the destruction of outlying population centers, decline in construction of earthen monuments at Cahokia, shifts in the prestige goods economy, and a contraction of agriculture (2, 10, 13, 29, 43, 54). The construction of the first palisade at the time of flood event V, followed by repeated rebuilding during the period of decreased summer season precipitation, along with evidence for considerable change in other aspects of Cahokian society, implies that environmental events were significant factors synergistically associated with Cahokia’s population decline and reorganization.
Conclusions
Dry conditions during the growing season and a large flood event were major factors in the onset of Cahokia’s population decline ca. 1150 CE, as interpreted from the stratigraphic relationships between δ18O values of carbonates, sedimentology, and Horseshoe Lake fecal stanols. It is noteworthy that this result is independent of chronology. However, the findings are strengthened by integrating the work of Benson et al. (4), Munoz et al. (6), and Bird et al. (5), and outline a complex narrative of Cahokia’s demographic decline. The agricultural implications of decreased warm season precipitation, coupled with a natural disaster in the form of a Mississippi River flood around 1150 CE, would have created stress for the Cahokia system atop cultural problems such as economic decline and political strife that cannot be measured through sedimentary analysis. We posit that climate change during the transition from MCA to LIA conditions is an important factor to consider in concert with social, political, and economic aspects of the occupation history at Cahokia and the surrounding area.
Methods
Core Selection and External Data.
Two cores from Horseshoe Lake, an oxbow lake that includes the site of Cahokia within its watershed, provide the material for analysis. The first core, HORM12, was collected by researchers from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2012 and is the basis for two papers on environmental conditions at Cahokia (6, 43). A second core, 15HSL, was collected in 2015 by the lead author ∼2 km south of the HORM12 site and closer to the input of Cahokia Creek (Fig. 1). Both cores were recovered using a modified Livingstone piston corer at water depths of ∼1 m. The purpose of the second core was to test the robustness of the fecal stanol record (15) and to provide sufficient material for stable isotope analysis. The two cores are readily correlated on the basis of stratigraphic variations, particularly layers interpreted as representing flood deposits (6), and variation in loss-on-ignition data (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S2).
Munoz et al. (43) used Clam 2.2 (55) and dates from nine terrestrial accelerator mass spectrometry samples (SI Appendix, Table S3) to build an age model for HORM12. This age model also provided the basis for our analyses of Core 15HSL. In this study, we incorporate grain size distribution and mineral content data (6) and fecal stanol data (15) from core HORM12 (43) with fecal stanol data (15) and new stable oxygen isotope data from 15HSL. We used HORM12 mineral content data and the Clam 2.2 age model (56) to show HORM12 mass accumulation rates (SI Appendix, Table S4). White et al. (15) analyzed 29 HORM12 sediment samples and 13 15HSL sediment samples for fecal stanol content through overnight soxhlet extraction with 200 mL dichloromethane, derivatization into trimethylsilyl ethers through a reaction with N,O-bistrifluoroacetamide, and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. White et al. (15) identified stanol compounds by comparing characteristic mass spectra fragmentation patterns and gas chromatographic retention times of samples and blank spikes with the chemical standard solutions of these compounds, and quantified samples by comparing peak areas with a calibration curve and the relative response factor of an internal standard.
Oxygen Isotopes.
We measured δ18O values on endogenic carbonate from 44 15HSL sediment samples (SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2). We sampled historic occupation levels (2–112 cm) at 10-cm intervals, and prehistoric occupation levels (117–282 cm) at 5-cm intervals. All sediment was pretreated with 2% reagent-grade bleach to oxidize reactive organic matter. Sediment was then sieved at 65 μm to remove any ostracods and shell material that could influence the isotope values. We rinsed each sample four times with high-purity deionized water to remove the bleach before freeze-drying. Samples were analyzed on a Finnigan MAT delta-XP isotope-ratio mass spectrometer coupled to a GasBench II autosampler at California State University, Long Beach. We calibrated values with NBS-18, NBS-19, and an internal standard. Analytical precision is 0.12‰ for δ18O; however, 10 replicates show greater variation within the sediment. Replicates can vary up to 0.5‰, likely because of the low concentration of carbonate in the sediment. Regardless of the low precision of individual samples, the general pattern of isotopic variation is not affected.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Sabrina Brown, Ian Bull, Jase Hixson, Hannah Hixson, Lindsey Jean-Shaw, Joe Mohan, Mo Nonu, Jeffery Stone, and Amanda White for their contributions. We thank the editor who forwarded this paper for review and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the Geological Society of America and California State University, Long Beach (CSULB). The Institute for Integrated Research on Materials, Environment, and Society Laboratory at CSULB provided laboratory access, material support, and project consultation.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1809400116/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Fowler ML. The Cahokia Atlas : A Historical Atlas of Cahokia Archaeology. Illinois Transportation Archeological Research Program, University of Illinois; Urbana, IL: 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Milner GR. The Cahokia Chiefdom : The Archaeology of a Mississippian Society. Univ Press Florida; Gainesville, FL: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cook ER, Seager R, Cane MA, Stahle DW. North American drought: Reconstructions, causes, and consequences. Earth Sci Rev. 2007;81:93–134. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Benson LV, Pauketat TR, Cook ER. Cahokia’s boom and bust in the context of climate change. Am Antiq. 2009;74:467–483. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bird BW, Wilson JJ, Gilhooly WP, III, Steinman BA, Stamps L. Midcontinental Native American population dynamics and late Holocene hydroclimate extremes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41628. doi: 10.1038/srep41628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Munoz SE, et al. Cahokia’s emergence and decline coincided with shifts of flood frequency on the Mississippi River. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:6319–6324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501904112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lopinot NH, Woods W. Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands. Univ Florida Press; Gainesville, FL: 1993. Wood overexploitation and the collapse of Cahokia; pp. 206–231. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woods WI. Population nucleation, intensive agriculture, and environmental degradation: The Cahokia example. Agric Human Values. 2004;21:255–261. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Milner GR. The late prehistoric Cahokia cultural system of the Mississippi River valley: Foundations, florescence, and fragmentation. J World Prehist. 1990;4:1–43. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trubitt MBD. Mound building and prestige goods exchange: Changing strategies in the Cahokia chiefdom. Am Antiq. 2000;65:669–690. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Trubitt MBD. Theory, Method, and Practice in Modern Archaeology. Praeger; Westport, CT: 2003. Mississippian period warfare and palisade construction at Cahokia; pp. 149–162. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Emerson TE. An introduction to Cahokia 2002: Diversity, complexity, and history. MidCont J Archaeol. 2002;27:127–148. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kelly JE. Contemplating Cahokia’s collapse. In: Raily JA, Reycraft RM, editors. Global Perspectives on the Collapse of Complex Systems. Maxwell Mus Anthropol; Albuquerque, NM: 2009. pp. 147–168. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pauketat T, Lopinot NH. Cahokian population dynamics. In: Pauketat T, Emerson T, editors. Cahokia: Domination and Ideology in the Mississippian World. Univ Nebraska Press; Lincoln, NE: 1997. pp. 103–123. [Google Scholar]
- 15.White AJ, et al. An evaluation of fecal stanols as indicators of population change at Cahokia, Illinois. J Archaeol Sci. 2018;93:129–134. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lopinot NH, Woods WI. Wood overexploitation and the collapse of Cahokia. In: Scarry EM, editor. Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands. Univ Florida Press; Gainesville, FL: 1993. pp. 206–231. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benson LV, et al. Possible impacts of early-11th-, middle-12th-, and late-13th-century droughts on western Native Americans and the Mississippian Cahokians. Quat Sci Rev. 2007;26:336–350. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bull ID, Simpson IA, van Bergen PF, Evershed RP. Muck ‘n’ molecules: Organic geochemical methods for detecting ancient manuring. Antiquity. 1999;73:86–96. [Google Scholar]
- 19.D’Anjou RM, Bradley RS, Balascio NL, Finkelstein DB. Climate impacts on human settlement and agricultural activities in northern Norway revealed through sediment biogeochemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:20332–20337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212730109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leeming R, Ball A, Ashbolt N, Nichols P. Using faecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish faecal pollution in receiving waters. Water Res. 1996;30:2893–2900. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bull ID, Lockheart MJ, Elhmmali MM, Roberts DJ, Evershed RP. The origin of faeces by means of biomarker detection. Environ Int. 2002;27:647–654. doi: 10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00124-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prost K, Birk JJ, Lehndorff E, Gerlach R, Amelung W. Steroid biomarkers revisited–Improved source identification of faecal remains in archaeological soil material. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0164882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martins CdC, Montone RC, Gamba RC, Pellizari VH. Sterols and fecal indicator microorganisms in sediments from Admiralty Bay, Antarctica. Braz J Oceanogr. 2005;53:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mann CC. 1493 : Uncovering the New World Columbus Created. Vintage Books; New York: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yellen JE. Archaeological Approaches to the Present: Models for Reconstructing the Past. Academic; New York: 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 26.O’Reilly K, Dhanju R, Goel A. Exploring “the remote” and “the rural”: Open defecation and latrine use in Uttarakhand, India. World Dev. 2017;93:193–205. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Betzenhauser AM. 2011. Creating the Cahokian community: The power of place in early Mississippian sociopolitical dynamics. PhD dissertation (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL)
- 28.Pauketat TR, Pauketat SL, Rees MA. An Archaeological Survey of the Horseshoe Lake State Park, Madison County, Illinois. Illinois State Museum Society; Springfield, IL: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pauketat TR, Fortier AC, Alt SM, Emerson TE. A Mississippian conflagration at East St. Louis and its political-historical implications. J Field Archaeol. 2013;38:210–226. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Grimalt JO, Fernandez P, Bayona JM, Albaiges J. Assessment of fecal sterols and ketones as indicators of urban sewage inputs to coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol. 1990;24:357–363. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Leng MJ, Marshall JD. Palaeoclimate interpretation of stable isotope data from lake sediment archives. Quat Sci Rev. 2004;23:811–831. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dansgaard W. Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus. 1964;16:436–468. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rozanski K, Araguás‐Araguás L, Gonfiantini R. Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records. AGU; Washington, DC: 2013. Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tian C, Wang L, Kaseke KF, Bird BW. Stable isotope compositions (δ2H, δ18O and δ17O) of rainfall and snowfall in the central United States. Sci Rep. 2018;8:6712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25102-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harvey FE, Welker JM. Stable isotopic composition of precipitation in the semi-arid north-central portion of the US Great Plains. J Hydrol. 2000;238:90–109. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Welker JM. Isotopic (δ18O) characteristics of weekly precipitation collected across the USA: An initial analysis with application to water source studies. Hydrol Processes. 2000;14:1449–1464. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sjostrom DJ, Welker JM. The influence of air mass source on the seasonal isotopic composition of precipitation, eastern USA. J Geochem Explor. 2009;102:103–112. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kendall C, Coplen TB. Distribution of oxygen-18 and deuteriun in river waters across the United States. Hydrol Processes. 2001;15:1363–1393. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stevens LR, Wright HE, Ito E. Proposed changes in seasonality of climate during the Lateglacial and Holocene at Lake Zeribar, Iran. Holocene. 2001;11:747–755. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Talbot MR. A review of the palaeohydrological interpretation of carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios in primary lacustrine carbonates. Chem Geol Isot Geosci Sect. 1990;80:261–279. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Toonen WHJ, Winkels TG, Cohen KM, Prins MA, Middelkoop H. Lower Rhine historical flood magnitudes of the last 450 years reproduced from grain-size measurements of flood deposits using end member modelling. Catena. 2015;130:69–81. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Munoz SE, et al. Climatic control of Mississippi River flood hazard amplified by river engineering. Nature. 2018;556:95–98. doi: 10.1038/nature26145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Munoz SE, Schroeder S, Fike DA, Williams JW. A record of sustained prehistoric and historic land use from the Cahokia region, Illinois, USA. Geology. 2014;42:499–502. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schroeder S, Munoz S. First Farmers, First Farms: Landscape Ecology of the Early Neolithic. Society of Ethnobiology; Tucson, AZ: 2016. Farmland, forest, and floods in the Cahokia area, Illinois. [Google Scholar]
- 45. National Weather Service (2018) National Weather Service Historical Crests for Mississippi River at St. Louis. Available at https://water.weather.gov. Accessed August 3, 2018.
- 46.Nolan DJ. “Dem Bones:” An aboriginal winter hunting camp from Mercer County, Illinois. Ill Archaeol J Ill Archaeol Surv. 2010;22:288–317. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kellogg LP. Early Narratives of the Northwest, 1634-1699. C. Scribners’s Sons; New York: 1917. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Robertson PA. Factors affecting tree growth on three lowland sites in Southern Illinois. Am Midl Nat. 1992;128:218–236. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Benson L, Petersen K, Stein J. Anasazi (pre-Columbian Native-American) migrations during the middle-12th and late-13th centuries—Were they drought induced? Clim Change. 2007;83:187–213. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jones TL, Schwitalla A. Archaeological perspectives on the effects of medieval drought in prehistoric California. Quat Int. 2008;188:41–58. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Patterson WP, Dietrich KA, Holmden C, Andrews JT. Two millennia of North Atlantic seasonality and implications for Norse colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5306–5310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902522107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. PAGES Magazine (2011) Medieval Climate Anomaly. Available at www.pages.unibe.ch/products/pages-magazine/1029-19-1-medieval-climate-anomaly. Accessed May 17, 2018.
- 53.Trouet V, et al. A 1500-year reconstruction of annual mean temperature for temperate North America on decadal-to-multidecadal time scales. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8:024008. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Iseminger WR. The Archaeology of the Cahokia Palisade. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency; Springfield, IL: 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Blaauw M. Methods and code for ‘classical’ age-modelling of radiocarbon sequences. Quat Geochronol. 2010;5:512–518. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Munoz SE. 2015. Forests, fields, and floods: A historical ecology of the Cahokia region, Illinois, USA. PhD dissertation (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI)
- 57.Gesch D, et al. The national elevation dataset. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2002;68:5–11. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.