Abstract
Chemoselective ligation of carbohydrates and polypeptides was achieved using an adipic acid dihydrazide cross-linker. The reducing end of a carbohydrate is efficiently attached to peptides in two steps, constructing a glycoconjugate in high yield and with high regioselectivity, enabling the production of homogeneous glycoconjugates.
Carbohydrates are often found linked to other biomolecules to form glycoconjugates. Glycoproteins and glycolipids, commonly found on the surface of cells, act as receptors for cell-cell recognition and are involved in cell growth, repair, adhesion and migration as well as tumor metastasis in cancer.[1] Vaccination is a key strategy for the control of infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria and parasites.[2] Oligosaccharides and polysaccharides can be antigenic,[3] and capsular polysaccharides (CPSs) of bacterial pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and Neisseria meningitidis, are highly antigenic and recognizable by mammalian B cell receptors. CPSs are major targets for eliciting carbohydrate specific antibody responses to confer protection from these pathogens. However, CPSs are poorly immunogenic only eliciting a short-term immune response without immunological memory. The conjugation of the carbohydrates of these pathogens to protein carriers can induce long-lasting protection against encapsulated bacteria opening a path to the development of glycoconjugate vaccines.[3–4] Glycoconjugate synthesis generally involves the random linking of carbohydrate and protein without regards to sites, leading to an incomplete understanding of mechanism of action.[3] The cellular and molecular mechanisms for adaptive immune activation mediated by glycoconjugate vaccines have been elucidated.[5] Demystifying T cell activation mechanisms of glycoconjugate vaccines represents a key step towards designing a knowledge-based, structurally-defined, generation of new vaccines. This study offers an efficient conjugation strategy.
Different carrier proteins can remarkably impact immunogenicity and the efficacy of glycoconjugate vaccines. The ability to synthesize glycoconjugates of greater structural diversity should afford an improved understanding of vaccine mechanism and result in the development of more effective vaccines.[6] In addition, the controlled glycosylation of peptide-based therapeutics can help protect against proteolytic degradation, denaturation and premature clearance, modulating their biophysical and physiological properties.[7] Improved methods for glycoconjugate synthesis are urgently needed.
There are many strategies for glycopeptide synthesis relying on conventional chemical utilization of aldehydes, thiols, activated esters or hydrazides, carboxylic acids and amines, and even new bacterial protein glycan coupling technologies (PGCT).[2a,6b,6c,8] These approaches provide low yields and complex product mixtures, particularly when the reactants involve proteins and glycans with multiple reactive sites or with high levels of steric hindrance.[2]
We describe a high-yield ligation chemistry affording homogenous glycoconjugates, in which the reducing sugar is first reacted with adipic acid dihydrazide (ADH) to form a carbohydrate bearing a linker at its reducing-end. The remaining acyl hydrazide is oxidatively converted to an acyl azide and then captured as a thioester and transesterified with the cysteine residue of a peptide to obtain a thioester-linked glycoconjugate. When this cysteine is at the N-terminus of the peptide chain, the thioester rapidly rearranges to form a stable amide linkage between the carbohydrate and peptide (Scheme 1). The installation of the ADH linker at the carbohydrate’s reducing end and its selective reaction with the cysteine residue of the peptide affords homogeneous constructs with compositional control of the carbohydrate-protein conjugate and preserves the integrity of carbohydrate epitopes.[9] In addition, ADH provides a 10-atom bridge between the carbohydrate and peptide after conjugation, potentially increasing detection limits of immunoassays by reducing steric hindrance.[10]
Our study began by re-investigating the previously published reaction between heparin and adipic acid dihydrazide for the directional immobilization of heparin onto surfaces.[11] A heparin dodecasaccharide, prepared through the controlled enzymatic depolymerization of heparin,[12] and ADH were reacted to form a hydrazone bond (Scheme 1 and Table 1). This chemistry is particularly challenging with this glycan since the heparin dodecasaccharide is a polyanion (−48 charge) with a molecular weight 3990 Da. Its single reducing end is comprised of a relatively unreactive sugar with an anionic N-sulfo group adjacent to its anomeric center. Several common conjugation conditions including NaCNBH3, PhNH2/MeOH/H2O[13] and CeCl3·7H2O[14] were initially tested and resulted in very low yields (entries 1–3). Interestingly, conjugation in AcOH-DMSO[15] afforded a high yield of multiple ADH conjugated to the heparin dodecasaccharide (entry 4). HCOONa buffer[16] afforded the single desired product at 75% yield (entry 5) and PhNH2/acetate buffer[17] provided the same desired product in 80% yield (entry 6). Based on these results, PhNH2/acetate buffer was selected as it provided high yields in the shortest reaction time.
Table 1.
Entry | Reagents/solvents | Temp(°C) | Time(h) | Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NaCNBH3, H2O | 70 | 48 | 10% |
2 | PhNH2, MeOH/H2O | 75 | 24 | trace |
3 | CeCl3·7H2O, EtOH/H2O | 50 | 1 | trace |
4 | AcOH/DMSO | 45 | 48 | Multiple conjugates |
5 | HCOONa buffer pH 4.75 | 37 | 72 | 75% |
6 | PhNH2, acetate buffer pH 5.5 | 50 | 24 | 80% |
With the optimized conditions in hand, we next turned our attention to investigate the scope of this reaction by treating various reducing disaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides, with adipic acid dihydrazide to prepare a small library of carbohydrate-ADH conjugates (Table S1, ESI†). Coupling either simple neutral or acidic oligosaccharides with dihydrazide under these optimized conditions, such as lactose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, maltooligosaccharide and 6’-sialyllactose afforded the expected products in nearly quantitative yields, and the yields were greatly improved compared to those obtained using previous methods[16] (entries 1–5). Two tetrasaccharides, Glc(1→3)GlcA(1→4)Glc(1→4)GlcA[18a] and GlcA(1→4)Glc(1→3)GlcA(1→4)Glc[18b], having glucuronic acid or glucose at the reducing end, prepared through controlled depolymerization of type-3 CPS of Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pn3P), also proved excellent substrates to conjugation with ADH, and are being investigated in vaccine development (entry 6–7). Notably, more structurally complex glycosaminoglycans, having both short or long carbohydrate chains, and low or high levels of sulfation, also furnished good results suggesting the adaptability of this method to a variety substrate (entries 8–15). Representative 1D 1H NMR data for the analysis of heparin-ADH, depolymerized heparin dodecasaccharide-ADH and lactose-ADH, are presented in Figure 1A. All the other compounds were also confirmed by NMR analyses (ESI†).
We next investigated the conjugation of different carbohydrate-ADH derivatives with a variety of peptides containing N-terminal cysteine residues (Table 2). Initially, we utilized conventional carbodiimide chemistry, involving EDC/NHS, to react lactose-ADH with the Cys-Gly dipeptide. This resulted in the recovery of starting materials with only trace amounts of conjugate (entry 1). 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholinium chloride (DMTMM) has been reported to be highly efficient for the activation of hydrazide chemistry in protein-protein ligation.[19] Thus, we undertook the reaction of lactose-ADH with the Cys-Gly dipeptide using DMTMM and obtained the desired glycopeptide conjugate in moderate 37% yield (entry 2).
Table 2.
Entry | Carbohydrate-ADH | Aglycones | Conditions | Yield (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lactose | Cys-Gly dipeptide | EDC/NHS | Trace |
2 | Lactose | Cys-Gly dipeptide | DMTMM | 37 |
3 | Lactose | Cys-Gly dipeptide | NaNO2, MPAA | 85 |
4 | Lactose | Cys-Laminin peptide | NaNO2, MPAA | 75 |
5 | Heparin dp12 | Cys-Laminin peptide | NaNO2, MPAA | 57 |
6 | Lactose | Cys-OVA-323–339 | NaNO2, MPAA | 68 |
7 | GlA-Glc | Cys-OVA-323–339 | NaNO2, MPAA | 67 |
8 | (GlcA-Glc)2 | Cys-OVA-323–339 | NaNO2, MPAA | 64 |
9 | 6'-Sialyllactose | AcHNCys-T20 | NaNO2, MPAA | 62 |
Liu and co-workers[20] recently developed a protein ligation method for the chemoselective reaction between a C-terminal peptide hydrazide and an N-terminal Cys-peptide affording a peptide bond. Inspired by this study, we investigated using sodium nitrite and thiol to form glycopeptides (Scheme 1 and Table 2). We were pleased that the reaction of lactose-ADH with the Cys-Gly dipeptide in the presence of NaNO2/MPAA (4-mercaptophenylacetic acid) generated the glycopeptide in excellent 85% yield (entry 3).
A representative characterization of lactose-dipeptide (Cys-Gly) by HRMS and NMR spectroscopy is presented in Figure 1B-E. The signals corresponding to the anomeric protons of Gal and Glc residues are 4.36 and 4.04 ppm, respectively. The signals at 1.52, 2.15 and 2.28 ppm correspond to the adipic linker. The 3JHH coupling constant of the Glc anomeric proton was 9.0 Hz, suggesting a β-linkage with the adipic linker. Proton signal of α-position at 4.67 ppm was overlapped by HDO in 1H NMR spectrum but could be detected (4.67, 52.2) in 2D HSQC spectrum. The H-H correlations between α and β position of cysteine residue were also observed. The structure was characterized by HRMS with [M+H]+ 645.2285 (Figure 1C).
We next evaluated the substrate sensitivity of this reaction. Using the more complex cysteine-containing tridecapolypeptide CRKRLQVQLSIRT, corresponding to the syndecan-1 binding sequence within laminin,[21] we coupled either simple lactose-ADH or the more complex heparin dp12-ADH (entries 4–5).
Cysteine-hydrazide coupling chemistry involves three steps based on a mechanistic analysis. Carbohydrate-ADH is first oxidized to the acyl azide, which subsequently reacts with the thiol group-containing reagent 4-mercaptophenylacetic acid and is then transesterfied by the N-terminal cysteine residue generating an acetyl-thiol ester intermediate. Proceeding through a five-membered ring transition state, the vicinal amino group of this cysteine residue then attacks the acetyl-thiol ester forming a more stable amide linkage (Scheme S1, ESI†).
Ovalbumin (OVA) 323–339 is a major MHC class II-restricted T-cell epitope of OVA, which has been used for studies of immunological allergic responses. The N-cysteine-containing OVA 323–339, CISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR, was used in the preparation of glycopeptides with stable amide linkages to lactose and a disaccharide and tetrasaccharide derived from the type-3 CPS of Streptococcus pneumoniae derived (entries 6–8). The binding of the major histocompatibility complex class II protein (MHCII) with the two synthetic glycopeptides (entries 7–8) was demonstrated (Figure 2). The OVA peptide (positive control, lane 1) and the two synthetic OVA-glycopeptides (lanes 4 and 5) bound to MHCII with comparable affinities. This is in contrast to the scrambled OVA peptide (negative control, lane 2), which only afforded a faint band due to aggregation of I-Ad protein in the absence of a binding peptide. MHCII molecules with an empty binding groove reportedly aggregate during prolonged incubation periods.[22] Binding was observed through the downward shift in pI resulting from the introduction of the negative charge associated with the glycan that is especially noticeable in the tetrasaccharide-peptide conjugate. T-cells have long been believed to be non-responsive to carbohydrate antigens. Recently, however, a model for T-cell recognition of a glycoconjugate vaccine has been advanced in which a carbohydrate epitope is presented on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell through MHCII. This presented epitope is then recognized by, and stimulates, carbohydrate specific CD4+ T cells.[5a–5c] Carbohydrate does not interfere with peptide binding MHCII (Figure 2). This suggests that in the case of glycoconjugate vaccines, the carrier peptide binds MHCII exposing the covalently linked carbohydrate for T-cell recognition.
Finally, we examined if coupling could occur with thiol-functionalized biomolecules in place of ones with an unprotected N-terminal cysteine. Enfuvirtide (ENF), a 36-residue synthetic peptide drug, is a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 infection used in the treatment of AIDS. Sialic acid conjugated ENF has a dramatically extended circulating half-life.[23] AcHNCys-T20, Ac-CYTSLIHSLIEESQNQQEKNEQELLELDKWASLWNWF-NH2, a modified version of ENF with an acetyl protected cysteine at its N-terminus, was conjugated with 6’-sialyllactose-ADH and obtained the thioester linked glycocojugate in good yield (entry 9). Additional glycoconjugates, to N-terminal protected, C-terminal, or internal cysteine residues also afford thioester-linked products (Table S2, ESI†).
In summary, we have successfully implemented a cross-linking strategy targeting glycoconjugate preparation. This chemistry involves ADH as cross-linking reagent combining the reducing end of carbohydrates with the thiol groups of target peptides. Based on Liu and coworkers,[20] who used a synthetic mono-hydrazide modified peptide as precursor in polypeptide synthesis, we introduced a bifunctional dihydrazide linker that could be directly introduced in high yield into the reducing end of the carbohydrate. The second hydrazide group was then oxidatively converted to an acyl azide, captured as a thioester and then chemoselectively transesterified with a Cys-peptide to afford the target glycopeptide. The strength of this approach lies in its ability to produce structurally defined, homogeneous glycan-peptide conjugates. Based on our mechanistic understanding of the activation of the immune response to glycoconjugates, this approach holds promise for the synthesis of glycopeptide vaccine.[5] This approach also facilitates the synthesis of glycosylated peptide-based therapeutics, protecting polypeptides against proteolysis, denaturation and improving their pharmacokinetics by modulating the biophysical and physiological properties. Finally, this chemistry has been extended to the chemoselective ligation of carbohydrate-hydrazide to biomolecules containing a single thiol group further broadening the scope of this reaction.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
There are no conflicts to declare. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0500201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21778074) and the Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SKLMR-20160604) and NIH (1R01AI123383, 5T32GM107004 (FA) and DK111958, HL125371, NS088496 (RJL).
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Notes and references
- 1.In Essentials of Glycobiology (Eds.: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Stanley P, Hart GW, Aebi M, Darvill AG, Kinoshita T, Packer NH, Prestegard JH, Schnaar RL and Seeberger PH), Cold Spring Harbor Press, NY, 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Kuberan B and Linhardt RJ, Curr. Org. Chem 2000, 4, 653–677 [Google Scholar]; b) Hütter J, Lepenies B in Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines: Methods and Protocols (Ed.: Lepenies B), Springer New York, New York, NY, 2015, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Avci FY and Kasper DL, Annu. Rev. Immunol 2010, 28, 107–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Avery OT and Goebel WF, J. Exp. Med 1931, 54, 437–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Avci FY, Li XM, Tsuji M and Kasper DL, Nat. Med 2011, 17, 1602–1610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Avci FY, Li XM, Tsuji M and Kasper DL, Nat. Protoc 2012, 7, 2180–2192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Middleton DR, Sun L, Paschall AV and Avci FY, J. Immunol 2017, 199, 598–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Dagan R, Poolman J and Siegrist C-A, Vaccine 2010, 28, 5513–5523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Koeller KM and Wong C-H, Chem. Rev 2000, 100, 4465–4494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Davis BG, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1999, 3215–3237. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Solá RJ and Griebenow K, BioDrugs 2010, 24, 9–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Terra VS, Mills DC, Yates LE, Abouelhadid S, Cuccui J and Wren BW, J. Med. Microbiol 2012, 61, 919–926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ashford P-A and Bew SP, Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 957–978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Hojo H and Nakahara Y, Pept. Sci 2007, 88, 308–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Herzner H, Reipen T, Schultz M and Kunz H, Chem. Rev 2000, 100, 4495–4538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Adamo R, Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 1270–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Basu A, Shrivastav TG and Kariya KP, Clin. Chem 2003, 49, 1410–1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nadkarni VD, Pervin A and Linhardt RJ, Anal. Biochem 1994, 222, 59–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pervin A, Gallo C, Jandik KA, Han X-J and Linhardt RJ, Glycobiology 1995, 5, 83–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coxon TP, Fallows TW, Gough JE and Webb SJ, Org. Biomol. Chem 2015, 13, 10751–10761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.dos Santos JM, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2014, 6411–6417. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li G, Li L, Xue C, Middleton D, Linhardt RJ and Avci FY, J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1397, 43–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Flinn NS, Quibell M, Monk TP, Ramjee MK and Urch CJ, Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16, 722–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Godula K and Bertozzi CR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 9963–9965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.a) Middleton DR, Zhang X, Wantuch PL, Ozdilek A, Liu X, Lopilato R, Gangasani N, Bridger R, Wells L, Linhardt RJ and Avci FY, Glycobiology, 2018, 28, 90–99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lefeber DJ, Gutiérrez Gallego R, Grün CH, Proietti D, D’Ascenzi S, Costantino P, Kamerling JP and Vliegenthart JFG, Carbohydr. Res 2002, 337, 819–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leitner A, Joachimiak LA, Unverdorben P, Walzthoeni T, Frydman J, Forster F and Aebersold R, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9455–9460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fang G-M, Li Y-M, Shen F, Huang Y-C, Li J-B, Lin Y, Cui H-K and Liu L, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 7645–7649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Balaoing LR, Post AD, Lin AY, Tseng H, Moake JL and Grande-Allen KJ, PLoS One 2015, 10, e0130749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grotenbreg GM, Nicholson MJ, Fowler KD, Wilbuer K, Octavio L, Yang M, Chakraborty AK, Ploegh HL and Wucherpfennig KW, J. Biol. Chem 2007, 282, 21425–21436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cheng S, Chang X, Wang Y, Gao GF, Shao Y, Ma L and Li X, J. Med. Chem 2015, 58, 1372–1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.