Abstract
Cardiac hypertrophy has become a major cardiovascular problem wordwide and is considered the early stage of heart failure. Treatment and prevention strategies are needed due to the suboptimal efficacy of current treatment methods. Recently, many studies have demonstrated the important role of histone acetylation in myocardium remodelling along with cardiac hypertrophy. A Chinese herbal extract containing anacardic acid (AA) is known to possess strong histone acetylation inhibitory effects. In previous studies, we demonstrated that AA could reverse alcohol‐induced cardiac hypertrophy in an animal model at the foetal stage. Here, we investigated whether AA could attenuate cardiac hypertrophy through the modulation of histone acetylation and explored its potential mechanisms in the hearts of transverse aortic constriction (TAC) mice. This study showed that AA attenuated hyperacetylation of acetylated lysine 9 on histone H3 (H3K9ac) by inhibiting the expression of p300 and p300/CBP‐associated factor (PCAF) in TAC mice. Moreover, AA normalized the transcriptional activity of the heart nuclear transcription factor MEF2A. The high expression of cardiac hypertrophy‐linked genes (ANP, β‐MHC) was reversed through AA treatment in the hearts of TAC mice. Additionally, we found that AA improved cardiac function and survival rate in TAC mice. The current results further highlight the mechanism by which histone acetylation is controlled by AA treatment, which may help prevent and treat hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Keywords: anacardic acid, cardiac hypertrophy, histone acetylation, thoracic aorta constriction
1. INTRODUCTION
Recently many studies have revealed the crucial role of chromatin remodelling particularly histone acetylation in cells during the regulation of gene expression in cardiovascular tissues. Histone acetylase (HAT) helps translocate acetyl groups from acetyl coenzyme A onto the ϵ‐amino group of lysine residues within nucleosomal histone tails, which neutralizes the charges carried by amino acids. This altered charge of the histone tail promotes chromatin relaxation and thus creates a local environment that accommodates the transcriptional machinery.1 To date, epigenetic gene regulation has been shown to actively participate in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases.2, 3 Cardiac hypertrophy is an important pathological process and is considered the early stage of heart failure. Recently, HAT and histone deacetylase (HDAC) were shown to be involved in the modulation and regulation of hypertrophic responses in heart dysfunction.4, 5, 6 We previously demonstrated that the imbalance of histone acetylation modification induced by HAT is involved in the development and progression of cardiac hypertrophy and that anacardic acid (AA) can decrease alcohol‐mediated cardiac hypertrophy.7 Unfortunately, the mechanism of AA underlying the Chinese herb extract‐mediated attenuation of cardiac hypertrophy caused by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to assess the potential of AA as a pan‐HAT inhibitor that corrects cardiac hypertrophy by suppressing HAT in an overload‐mediated cardiac hypertrophy model. These studies were carried out to identify strategies to decrease pressure overload‐induced cardiac hypertrophy.
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1. Experimental mice
Sterile‐ or pathogen‐free 10‐ to 12‐week‐old Kunming mice (both male and female) with a body mass of 25‐30 g were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center at Zunyi Medical University (Guizhou, China). The animal trials used in the experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Zunyi Medical University. Mice were kept under fully controlled conditions (22 ± 1°C, 55% ± 5% humidity) and allowed food ad libitum along with equal light:dark cycles (12 h:12 h). Mice were exposed to pressure overload through thoracic aortic banding (TAB) (≈70% thoracic aortic diameter). TAC mice were given AA which is a pan‐HAT inhibitor. Dimethylsulphoxide was used to dissolve AA for further preparations of 1 mg/ml and finally stored at 4°C. AA (3.75 ml/kg) was intraperitoneally injected into TAC mice every third day for up to 3 weeks after operation. Killing of mice was carried out by CO2 narcosis, and finally, the heart tissues were collected for further analyses.
2.2. Detection of HAT activity
The mouse myocardial tissues were homogenized to extract nucleoproteins using a Nuclear Extract Kit (Invent, Minnesota, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The HAT activity of the protein extracts was examined colourimetrically using a HAT assay kit (GenMed, Shanghai, China).
2.3. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
The mouse heart tissue homogenates were placed in 1% formaldehyde for crosslinking of DNA‐protein complexes. After crosslinking, the DNA was sheared through sonication followed by DNA‐protein complex precipitation using monoclonal antibodies (anti‐MEF2A, anti‐p300, anti‐PCAF and anti‐GCN5) (ChIP grade, Abcam, Cambridge, England). A DNA purification kit (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to extract the pure DNA molecules. All experiments had both positive control (precipitated by anti‐RNA polymerase II antibody) and negative control (precipitated by normal mouse IgG) groups. Quantitative real‐time PCR was performed after ChIP assays were conducted using a ChIP assay Kit (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
2.4. Immunoblotting
The mouse myocardial tissues were harvested to extract the nucleoproteins mentioned above and separated on 8/12% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gels through electrophoresis and blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). These PVDF blots were probed against rabbit polyclonal antibodies [acetylated lysine 9 on histone H3 (H3K9ac), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), foetal isoform of myosin heavy chain (β‐MHC), α‐actin, p300 and PCAF] (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:1,000 dilution) or rabbit polyclonal antibody against histone H3 and β‐actin (Beyotime, Shanghai, China, 1:1,000 dilution) in Tris‐buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) plus 5% non‐fat milk at 4°C overnight. HRP‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA) was used as the secondary antibody. After the PVDF membranes were scanned, the bands were subjected to analysis using the Quantity One (Version 4.4) software package (Bio‐Rad, CA, USA).
2.5. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining
Mouse heart tissues were collected and placed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours and were later transferred to 70% ethyl alcohol. Each heart tissue was placed into processing cassettes, passed through a gradient alcoholic series for dehydration and finally embedded in paraffin wax. Prior to immunostaining, heart tissue sections (5 μm) were dewaxed using xylene, rehydrated through reverse alcoholic gradient washed with PBS, and finally stained using haematoxylin and eosin.
2.6. Echocardiography
Trans‐thoracic echocardiograms of conscious‐sedated mice were performed following the previously described methods8, 9.
2.7. Statistical analysis
The data obtained in this study were subjected to statistical analyses and are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). One‐way analysis of variance (1‐way ANOVA) and LSD‐t tests were applied to determine the significance of the results, where P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Pressure overload‐induced cardiac hypertrophy caused by TAB in mice
To investigate the TAC‐induced myocardial hypertrophy in mouse hearts, we exposed the mice to pressure overload through TAB, and a histological examination was performed on the mouse heart tissues. The TAC mouse heart data obtained from stereoscopic analysis and haematoxylin and eosin staining showed apparent enlargement compared with those of the sham group. Myocardial hypertrophy was present, especially in the interventricular septum and left ventricle (Figure 1A, 1). Moreover, haematoxylin and eosin staining revealed diffuse hypertrophy by myocytes, while nuclei in the myocardial cells were significantly inflated compared with those of the sham group (Figure 1C). To assess the body‐weight effect on heart size, we examined the cardiac mass index (CMI) and lung mass index (LMI) in this study. The results demonstrated that CMI was apparently increased in TAC mice compared to sham group mice, while LMI had no defined difference in the same mouse hearts (Table 1). To further explore the changes in myocardial hypertrophy at the molecular and gene levels, we assessed biomarkers of myocardial hypertrophy in the TAC mouse hearts. The data showed that during hypertrophic growth in the hearts, expression of the β‐MHC gene was significantly enhanced, while ANP was improved (Figure 1D, 1). However, the expression of α‐actin was unchanged in the same heart tissues (Figure 1F).
Table 1.
HW (g) | LW (g) | BW (g) | HW/BW (mg/g) | LW/BW (mg/g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 38.35 ± 3.64 | 3.39 ± 0.21 | 7.16 ± 0.62 |
TAC | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 39.38 ± 5.16 | 4.71 ± 0.52* | 7.77 ± 0.89 |
Sham | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.06 | 42.22 ± 6.15 | 3.59 ± 0.26 | 6.82 ± 0.94 |
P value | - | - | - | 0.01 | 0.20 |
CMI, cardiac mass index, LMI, lung mass index, TAC, thoraic aorta coarctation.
P < 0.05 TAC vs normal group.
3.2. AA inhibits pressure overload‐induced cardiac hypertrophy
To examine the effect of the HAT inhibitor AA on pressure overload‐mediated cardiac hypertrophy, we exposed the mice to TAB, and the molecular structural formula of Chinese AA herbal extracts was defined (Figure 1G). The optimal exposure dose of AA was first determined. TAC mice were injected intraperitoneally with various concentrations of AA (0, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0 and 6.25 mg/kg) based on previous reports.10 An optimum concentration (3.75 mg/kg) was defined based on the ac‐H3 level in the hearts of TAC mice (Figure 1H). After operation, mice were randomly injected intraperitoneally with either AA or vehicle (Veh). Another group of mice was assigned as the sham operation group, which was injected with Veh every third day for up to 3 weeks. We observed pressure overload‐induced cardiac hypertrophy mediated by TAB in mouse hearts, and administration of AA (3.75 mg/kg) significantly suppressed hypertrophic growth measured as the heart mass normalized to the body mass (Figure 1I), but the lung mass showed no change in the same samples (Figure 1J).
3.3. The HAT activity and echocardiography results in the hypertrophic hearts induced by TAC
Some evidence has suggested that the imbalance of histone acetylation modification is involved in cardiac hypertrophy induced by TAC. To determine whether hyperacetylation of H3K9ac induced by HAT might be a vital factor in promoting myocardial hypertrophy, we tested the HAT activity in hypertrophic mouse hearts. Colorimetric assays revealed that HAT activity was significantly increased in TAC mice hearts (Figure 1K). Meanwhile, the echocardiography results also demonstrated that AA could attenuate pressure overload cardiac hypertrophy induced by TAB in the mouse hearts (Figure 2A‐C). These data suggested that AA attenuated pressure overload‐induced cardiac hypertrophy. However, the potential mechanisms remain unknown. Next, we explored the potential mechanisms from an epigenetic perspective.
3.4. The regulatory relationship between HAT and the transcription factor MEF2A
We further explored the effects of p300‐HAT and PCAF‐HAT, which control histone acetylation by regulating stress responses through MEF2A transcriptional activity in the mouse heart. The regulatory relationship between HAT and MEF2A was tested by ChIP‐PCR, and p300‐HAT and PCAF‐HAT efficiently bound the MEF2A promoter; however, GCN5‐HAT could not bind to the MEF2A promoter (Figure 3A), indicating that p300‐HAT and PCAF‐HAT were involved in modulating MEF2A transcription.
3.5. AA reverses hyperacetylation of H3K9ac by inhibiting p300 and PCAF and normalizing the transcriptional activity of MEF2A
To investigate the mechanisms by which AA decreases cardiac hypertrophy in TAC mice, we performed ChIP‐Q‐PCR experiments. The ChIP‐Q‐PCR assays showed that AA significantly reduced the binding of p300‐HAT and PCAF‐HAT at the MEF2A promoter in TAC + AA mice compared with TAC + Veh mice (Figure 3B). Therefore, we have suggested that the H3K9ac level on the MEF2A promoter also decreased in TAC + AA mice compared to TAC + Veh mice. As expected, similar results were obtained when we examined H3K9ac level on the MEF2A promoter in the same samples (Figure 3C). Meanwhile, the Western blot data showed that decreases in p300 and PCAF were observed in the TAC mice treated with AA compared to the TAC mice, but there was no significant change in the TAC + Veh mice (Figure 3D,E). In previous experiments, we demonstrated that p300 and PCAF are involved in controlling the transcription of MEF2A using ChIP‐PCR and that AA could inhibit the overexpression of p300‐HAT and PCAF‐HAT in the mouse heart. Thus, we have suggested that the level of histone acetylation was inhibited in the same samples. Western blots demonstrated that AA attenuated the hyperacetylation of H3K9ac at the translational level in TAC mice, as expected (Figure 3F). In addition, ac‐H4 was tested in the mouse heart, and immunoblot data showed that the ac‐H4 level was increased in the hearts of mice treated with TAB compared to that of the sham group. Interestingly, AA significantly decreased the ac‐H4 level in the hearts of TAC mice (Figure 3G).
3.6. AA decreases the transcriptional activity of MEF2A and normalizes the overexpression of downstream cardiac hypertrophic genes
MEF2A is a critical transcription factor that is involved in heart development, cardiac hypertrophy and many other cardiovascular diseases. Thus we first tested the mRNA expression of the MEF2A gene through Q‐PCR and found an obvious increase in gene expression in TAC mice, while exposure to AA decreased the overexpression of MEF2A mRNA in the TAC mouse hearts (Figure 4A). To MEF2A on cardiac hypertrophy‐related downstream genes in TAC mice, we assayed the regulatory relationship between MEF2A and downstream cardiac hypertrophy‐linked genes (ANP and β‐MHC). The binding affinity between MEF2A and the promoters of ANP, β‐MHC and α‐actin was detected by PCR after ChIP. The ChIP‐PCR results showed that MEF2A could bind to the promoters of ANP and β‐MHC but not α‐actin (Figure 4B). The above results indicate that the heart nuclear transcription factor MEF2A is involved in regulating cardiac hypertrophy‐related ANP and β‐MHC gene expression.
To investigate the effects of AA on cardiac hypertrophy in the hearts of TAC mice, we assayed the biomarkers of myocardial hypertrophy, ANP and β‐MHC, by Q‐PCR and immunoblotting, and the morphology of hearts in the TAC mice was also examined using haematoxylin and eosin staining. Q‐PCR data showed that the mRNA levels of ANP and β‐MHC in the hearts of TAC mice treated with AA were significantly decreased compared to those of TAC mice treated with Veh (Figure 4C,D). The Western blot results showed that AA could also attenuate the overexpression of ANP and β‐MHC in the same samples (Figure 4E,F). Haematoxylin and eosin staining data showed that AA could significantly reduce the left ventricle and ventricular septum thickness in the hearts of TAC mice (Figure 4G). The cross‐sectional area of cardiomyocytes in the TAC + AA group was apparently diminished compared to that of the TAC group (Figure 4H,I).
3.7. AA improves survival rate and cardiac function in the hearts of TAC mice
For clinical use of the HAT inhibitor AA, it is important to evaluate its long‐term efficacy and tolerability. To explore this issue, we studied mice subjected to TAB or sham operation and treated them with AA (3.75 mg/kg, every 3 days) for 8 weeks, a period roughly corresponding to 6 to 8 years in humans. In this study, exposure to AA was well tolerated throughout the study (8 weeks) and had no effect on survival [Sham + Veh, 95% (n = 23); TAC + Veh, 45% (n = 43); TAC + AA, 73% (n = 35)] (Figure 5A). The current results suggest that AA can suppress hypertrophic growth.
To examine the effect of AA on the normal functioning of hearts, we performed echocardiography of the mice. Here, we observed modest declines in left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular end systolic dimension (LVESD) in TAC + Veh mice, which is consistent with pressure overload‐mediated pathological reformation. In mice treated with TAC + AA, there was a sharp and significant decline in LVEDV, LVESV, LVEDD and LVESD expression compared to that of TAC + Veh mice (P < 0.05), despite the presence of blunted but compensational hypertrophic responses. Meanwhile, the interventricular septum (IVS) and left ventricular posterior wall (LVAWT) were decreased significantly in TAC + AA mice compared with those of TAC + Veh mice (Table 2). Additionally, LVEF was observed in the mouse hearts, and the data showed that LVEF was increased significantly in TAC mice as time increased, but after 4 months of operation, LVEF was apparently decreased in TAC mice, perhaps due to heart failure. Importantly, LVEF in the TAC mice treated with AA had no apparent change compared with that of the sham group, and heart failure was not observed in the TAC mice treated with AA (Figure 5B).
Table 2.
Normal | TAC | TAC + Veh | TAC + AA | F value | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | ||||||
Body weight (g) | 38.57 ± 2.99 | 39.13 ± 4.32 | 38.52 ± 2.76 | 37.36 ± 3.46 | 3.51 | 0.17 |
Heart rate (bpm) | 468 ± 5 | 476 ± 8 | 464 ± 5 | 443 ± 4 | 2.57 | 0.26 |
LV end diastole | ||||||
LVAWT (mm) | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 1.62 ± 0.05 | 1.69 ± 0.04 | 1.23 ± 0.05** | 5.76 | 0.04 |
IVS (mm) | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 1.02 ± 0.03* | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 0.76 ± 0.02** | 6.89 | 0.03 |
LVEDD (mm) | 3.54 ± 0.05 | 2.58 ± 0.05* | 2.67 ± 0.03 | 2.91 ± 0.04** | 5.98 | 0.04 |
LV volume (μL) | 47.88 ± 0.40 | 35.46 ± 0.51* | 48.02 ± 0.54 | 38.66 ± 0.43** | 6.92 | 0.03 |
LV end systole | ||||||
LVAWT (mm) | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 1.76 ± 0.04* | 1.80 ± 0.02 | 1.42 ± 0.03** | 5.39 | 0.04 |
IVS (mm) | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 1.03 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.02 | 2.15 | 0.28 |
LVESD (mm) | 2.29 ± 0.02 | 1.67 ± 0.03* | 1.58 ± 0.02 | 2.09 ± 0.02** | 5.75 | 0.04 |
LV volume (μL) | 22.54 ± 0.34 | 12.51 ± 0.28* | 11.18 ± 0.22 | 19.28 ± 0.32** | 5.66 | 0.04 |
AA, anacardic acid; IVS, interventricular septum; LVAWT, left ventricular anterior wall thickness; LVEDD, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricular end systolic dimension; TAC, thoraic aorta coarctation.
P < 0.05 TAC vs normal group.
P < 0.05 TAC + AA vs TAC + Veh.
4. DISCUSSION
In this study, we demonstrated that pressure overload‐mediated cardiac hypertrophy in TAC mice, in which histone acetylation played a significant role in myocardial hypertrophy. Additionally, we demonstrated that AA, a Chinese herbal extract, could attenuate cardiac hypertrophy by repressing HAT function, subsequently decreasing histone acetylation.
In fact, haemodynamic stress has been suggested to cause cardiac hypertrophy, resulting in cardiac malfunctioning and abrupt failure.11, 12, 13 This process corresponds to the expression of genes induced by epigenetic regulation involved in postmitotic myocytes, leading to cardiac hypertrophy. This epigenetic alteration in response to extrinsic stresses promoted alterations in the translation of sarcomeric protein, relaxation of diastolic turns, metabolism, modulation of calcium influx and formation of collagen, which are solely controlled by various transcriptional regulators of the stress‐response muscle enhancer factor‐2 (MEF2) family.14, 15 To date, many distinct HATs have been reported in humans. Five relatively important HAT isoforms have been reported in mammalian cardiac cells—p300, CREB‐binding protein, steroid receptor coactivator‐1, PCAF and general control nonderepressible‐5 (GCN5).16 In our study, we clearly demonstrated that p300‐HAT and PCAF‐HAT in cardiomyocytes are vital regulatory factors. Acetylated H3K9 on the promoter of MEF2A, a cardiac hypertrophy‐related transcriptional regulator, caused overexpression of cardiac hypertrophy‐related genes, eventually inducing the development of cardiac hypertrophy.
The HAT activity could be inhibited pharmacologically to increase or decrease related gene expression accordingly.17, 18, 19 HAT inhibitors such as AA, curcumin and ANP32A have attracted attention in recent years by cardiologists as they can repress histone acetylation.20, 21, 22 HAT and HDAC are two key histone modulators known to play crucial roles in survival, growth, proliferation and cellular differentiation that participate in cardiac myocyte growth and help produce stress responses.23, 24 A recent study confirmed that HAT p300 is required for cardiac myocyte gene expression.6 Our results showed that the imbalance of histone acetylation (H3K9ac) induced by p300 and PCAF (isoforms of HATs) could be involved in promoting myocardial hypertrophy in the hearts of TAC mice. We also showed that MEF2A mRNA expression was significantly increased in the hypertrophic hearts of TAC mice. These results suggest that MEF2A is a vital transcription factor contributing to myocardial hypertrophy by pressure overload. However, AA administration could inhibit MEF2A transcription by decreasing H3K9ac hyperacetylation through repression of PCAF and p300 at the MEF2A promoters. Interestingly, AA also normalized the overexpression of myocardial hypertrophy biomarker genes, for example, ANP and β‐MHC, in the cardiac tissue of TAC mice. Our data suggest that H3K9 hyperacetylation is mediated by PCAF‐HAT and p300‐HAT and plays a significant role in pressure overload‐induced cardiac hypertrophy. The findings are consistent with previous reports that the imbalance of histone H3K9ac modification induced by p300 and PCAF is involved to involve in pathological cardiac hypertrophy.25, 26
In our previous studies, the imbalance in acetylation of histones facilitated by HAT (PCAF, p300) was related to cardiac hypertrophy‐mediated phenylephrine.27 This study demonstrated that hyperacetylation of H3K9ac induced by HAT (p300 and PCAF) is involved in the development and progression of cardiac hypertrophy caused by TAC. The findings of this study suggested that HAT activation was involved in the final and joint cellular pathways driven via varied hypertrophic agonists. Inhibition of gene activation and expression at this step may be a therapeutic strategy for preventing or ameliorating cardiac hypertrophy, which subsequently leads to heart failure. AA has been reported to inhibit HAT activity.28 Our experiments demonstrated that AA could also inhibit HAT to attenuate myocardial hypertrophy, especially that of the left ventricular wall and ventricular septum, and echocardiography data further demonstrated that AA could improve cardiac function. Meanwhile, long‐term exposure to AA improved the survival rate along with cardiac function in TAC mice, and no toxic or side effects were observed in TAC mice treated with AA. However, the development of a new HAT inhibitor may result in increased selectivity and decreased toxic effects. Additional pre‐clinical studies are needed to confirm that this novel HAT inhibitor can be used for the prevention or reversal of cardiac hypertrophy as well as heart failure. Previously, we reported27 that some related indices in blood samples and no any abnormalities in AA‐treated mice were observed, which suggested and confirmed that AA could be a candidate drug for further clinical experiments. However, large studies and more data are needed prior to the application of AA in clinical trials.
AA attenuates cardiac hypertrophy mediated by pressure overload by inhibiting HAT activity, which may contribute to reducing and treating hypertrophy through cardiomyopathy. However, the upstream signalling pathway of AA‐attenuated cardiac hypertrophy in TAC mice is still unknown. In addition, in the process of constructing the cardiac hypertrophy model by TAB in mice, the mortality rate is approximately 40%, and the main causes of death include infection, surgical trauma, heart failure and shocks. We used only the surviving mice for the experiments. Nevertheless, our current results provide strong evidence suggesting that inhibition of HAT is a potential therapeutic strategy and show promise for treating overload‐induced heart dysfunction.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Li S, Peng B, Luo X, Sun H, Peng C. Anacardic acid attenuates pressure‐overload cardiac hypertrophy through inhibiting histone acetylases. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:2744–2752. 10.1111/jcmm.14181
Funding information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 81560040) and the Doctoral Startup Foundation of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (Grant Number: 2015‐4).
REFERENCES
- 1. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293:1074‐1080. 10.1126/science.1063127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rizki G, Boyer LA. Lncing epigenetic control of transcription to cardiovascular development and disease. Circ Res. 2015;117:192‐206. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.304156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yan MS, Marsden PA. Epigenetics in the vascular endothelium: looking from a different perspective in the epigenomics era. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:2297‐2306. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lu J, McKinsey TA, Nicol RL, et al. Signal‐dependent activation of the MEF2 transcription factor by dissociation from histone deacetylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4070‐4075. 10.1073/pnas.080064097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zhang CL, McKinsey TA, Chang S, et al. Class II histone deacetylases act as signal‐responsive repressors of cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 2002;110:479‐488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gusterson RJ, Jazrawi E, Adcock IM, et al. The transcriptional co‐activators CREB‐binding protein (CBP) and p300 play a critical role in cardiac hypertrophy that is dependent on their histone acetyltransferase activity. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:6838‐6847. 10.107/jbc.M211762200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Peng C, Zhang W, Zhao W, et al. Alcohol‐induced histone H3K9 hyperacetylation and cardiac hypertrophy are reversed by a histone acetylases inhibitor anacardic acid in developing murine hearts. Biochimie. 2015;113:1‐9. 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hill JA, Karimi M, Kutschke W, et al. Cardiac hypertrophy is not a required compensatory response to short‐term pressure overload. Circulation. 2000;101:2863‐2869. 10.1161/01.CIR.101.24.2863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hill JA, Rothermel B, Yoo KD, et al. Targeted inhibition of calcineurin in pressure‐overload cardiac hypertrophy. Preservation of systolic function. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10251‐10255. 10.1074/jbc.M110722200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Colussi C, Rosati J, Straino S, et al. Nepsilon‐lysine acetylation determines dissociation from GAP junctions and lateralization of connexin 43 in normal and dystrophic heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:2795‐2800. 10.1073/pnas.1013124108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wei J, Joshi S, Speransky S, et al. Reversal of pathological cardiac hypertrophy via the MEF2‐coregulator interface. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e91068 10.1172/jci.insight.91068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Marian AJ, Braunwald E. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: genetics, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and therapy. Circ Res. 2017;121:749‐770. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Christiaans I, van Engelen K, van Langen IM, et al. Rski stratification for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review of clinical risk markers. Europace. 2010;12:313‐321. 10.1093/europace/eup431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Potthoff MJ, Olson EN. MEF2: a central regulator of diverse developmental programs. Development. 2007;134:4131‐4140. 10.1242/dev.008367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dadson K, Turdi S, Hashemi S, et al. Adiponectin is required for cardiac MEF2 activation during pressure overload induced hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;86:102‐109. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yang XJ, Seto E. HATs and HDACs: from structure, function and regulation to novel strategies for therapy and prevention. Oncogene. 2007;26:5310‐5318. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schiano C, Vietri MT, Grimaldi V, et al. Epigenetic‐related therapeutic challenges in cardiovascular disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015;36:226‐235. 10.1016/j.tips.2015.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Eom GH, Nam YS, Oh JG, et al. Regulation of acetylation of histone deacetylase 2 by p300/CBP‐associated factor/histone deacetylase 5 in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2014;114:1133‐1143. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Qiao W, Zhang W, Gai Y, et al. The histone acetyltransferase MOF overexpression blunts cardiac hypertrophy by targeting ROS in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;448:379‐384. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Peng C, Zhu J, Sun HC, et al. Inhibition of histone H3K9 acetylation by anacardic acid can correct the over‐expression of Gata4 in the hearts of fetal mice exposed to alcohol during pregnancy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104135 10.1371/joumal.pone.0104135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sun H, Zhu J, Lu T, et al. Curcumin‐mediated cardiac defects in mouse is associated with a reduced histone H3 acetylation and reduced expression of cardiac transcription factors. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2014;14:162‐169. 10.1007/s12012-013-9240-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chai GS, Feng Q, Ma RH, et al. Inhibition of histone acetylation by ANP32A induces memory deficits. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63:1537‐1546. 10.3233/JAD-180090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bishopric NH, Zeng GQ, Sato B, et al. Adenovirus E1A inhibits cardiac myocyte‐specific gene expression through its amino terminus. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:20584‐20594. 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Slepak TI, Webster KA, Zang J, et al. Control of cardiac‐specific transcription by p300 through myocyte enhancer factor‐2D. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:7575‐7585. 10.1074/jbc.M004625200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pillai VB, Sundaresan NR, Samant SA, et al. Acetylation of a conserved lysine residue in the ATP binding pocket of p38 augments its kinase activity during hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:2349‐2363. 10.1128/MCB.01205-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sunagawa Y, Funamoto M, Sono S, et al. Curcumin and its demethoxy derivatives possess p300 HAT inhibitory activity and suppress hypertrophic responses in cardiomyocytes. J Pharmacol Sci. 2018;136:212‐217. 10.1016/j.jphs.2017.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Peng C, Li S, Luo X, et al. Phenylephrine‐induced cardiac hypertrophy is attenuated by a histone acetylase inhibitor anacardic acid in mice. Mol Biosyst. 2017;13:714‐724. 10.1039/c6mb00692b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tsai YJ, Tsai T, Peng PC, et al. Histone acetyltransferase p300 is induced by p38MAPK after photodynamic therapy: the therapeutic response is increased by the p300HAT inhibitor anacardic acid. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;86:118‐132. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]