Skip to main content
BMC Pulmonary Medicine logoLink to BMC Pulmonary Medicine
. 2019 Mar 25;19:69. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0805-y

Correction to: Are there differences among operators in false-negative rates of endosonography with needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer?

Sukyeon Kim 1, Beomsu Shin 2, Hyun Lee 3, Jick Hwan Ha 4, Kyungjong Lee 5, Sang-Won Um 5, Hojoong Kim 5, Byeong-Ho Jeong 5,
PMCID: PMC6434843  PMID: 30909918

Correction to: BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2018) 19:14

DOI: 10.1186/s12890-018-0774-6

Following publication of the original article [1], the author flagged that the ‘True negative’ values given in Table 1, for ‘Excluding patients with inaccessible LNs’, were wrong for ‘Adenocarcinoma’, ‘Squamous cell carcinoma’ and ‘Others’.

The (incorrect) values previously given were 273 (46.0) for ‘Adenocarcinoma’, 44 (7.4) for ‘Squamous cell carcinoma’, and a blank value for ‘Others’.

Please be advised that the correct values are:

277 (46.6) for ‘Adenocarcinoma’.

273 (46.0) for ‘Squamous cell carcinoma’.

44 (7.4) for ‘Other’.

The original article has now been corrected to reflect this.

The publisher apologizes for this error.

Reference

  • 1.Kim et al. (2018) Are there differences among operators in false-negative rates of endosonography with needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer? (2018) 19:14 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-018-0774-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from BMC Pulmonary Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES