Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Mar 26;9:5200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40783-4

Dynamic interaction between basin redox and the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle in an unconventional Proterozoic petroleum system

Grant M Cox 1,✉, Pierre Sansjofre 2, Morgan L Blades 1, Juraj Farkas 1, Alan S Collins 1
PMCID: PMC6435709  PMID: 30914671

Abstract

Precambrian hydrocarbons and their corresponding source rocks are distinctly different from their Phanerozoic counterparts, having been deposited in persistently anoxic environments in ecosystems dominated by bacteria. Here, we show that cyclic enrichment of organic matter in the world’s oldest hydrocarbon play (ca. 1.38 Ga), is not associated with flooding surfaces and is unrelated to variations in mineralogy or changes in the relative rate of clastic to biogenic sedimentation—factors typically attributed to organic enrichment in Phanerozoic shales. Instead, the cyclic covariation of total organic carbon, δ15N, δ13C and molybdenum are explained by the feedback between high levels of primary productivity, basin redox and the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. These factors are important in constraining productivity in the marine biosphere, the development of Precambrian hydrocarbon source rocks, and more generally in understanding oxygenation of the ocean and atmosphere through Earth history; as all are ultimately related to organic carbon burial.

Introduction

High total organic carbon (TOC) content within sediments has been attributed to various factors, including high primary productivity1, high nutrient fluxes due to warm and wet climatic conditions2,3, basin redox conditions facilitating the preservation of organic matter4, mineralogical controls on organic carbon export5–7 and changes in the relative rate of clastic to biogenic sedimentation8. Understanding these processes, which likely vary in both space and time, are important in constraining the development of hydrocarbon source rocks and more generally in understanding oxygenation of the ocean and atmosphere through Earth history; as both are tied to organic carbon burial.

Primary productivity is generally accepted to be limited by the availability of phosphorus, dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN: NH4+, NO3−) and bio-essential trace metals9–12. Furthermore, it is widely appreciated that high levels of primary productivity and organic matter export can influence basin redox. In particular, Johnston et al.13 demonstrated the relationship between high levels of organic carbon export and euxinia, while Anbar and Knoll11 highlighted how basin redox, in particular euxinia, influences nutrient concentrations, in particular trace nutrients such as molybdenum, with flow on effects for bioavailable nitrogen. Furthermore, recent work has shown that the magnitude of organic matter supply also affects the rate of denitrification14 and consequently bioavailable nitrogen concentrations. Such effects on nitrogen availability naturally affect primary productivity and organic carbon burial, as biologically available nitrogen can limit photosynthesis and is often referred to as the proximal limiting nutrient10. Building upon these general observations, we present 𝛿15N and 𝛿13C data from the hydrocarbon-bearing Roper Group of the greater McArthur Basin of northern Australia. These suggest that the cyclic production of high TOC sediments in this Mesoproterozoic black shale succession is controlled by oscillations between nitrogen replete and nitrogen limited conditions. These are hypothesized to be a consequence of the coupling of elevated primary productivity, high degrees of organic carbon export, basin redox and the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. These processes interact to impact nitrogen availability through changes in the balance between nitrogen supply via N2 fixation and nitrogen loss through denitrification.

Nitrogen Isotopes

In models for stratified oceans with only a shallow oxic layer15,16, a condition widely considered to characterise the Proterozoic17, the availability of bioavailable nitrogen would be tied to prokaryotes (i.e. cyanobacteria) that perform N2-fixation (i.e. diazotrophy), along with remineralised nitrogen. The loss of bioavailable nitrogen is achieved either through heterotrophic denitrification and/or anaerobic ammonium oxidation (i.e. ANAMMOX). It is widely held that diazotrophs are at a competitive disadvantage under nitrogen replete conditions. Consequently, it is only under nitrogen-limited conditions that diazotrophs are expected to fix appreciable amounts of nitrogen. As the diazotroph biomass has an average 𝛿15N of ~−1‰, and can range from −3‰ to +1‰18, any increase in N2-fixation in response to nitrogen limitation tends to decrease the 𝛿15N of DIN toward pure N2-fixation values (i.e. −3‰ to +1‰). In contrast to N2 fixation, denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation preferentially return light nitrogen to the atmosphere, leaving the residual pool of bioavailable nitrogen isotopically heavier19,20. Nitrification and biological assimilation produce large fractionations in nitrogen isotopes21,22, however, these fractionations are ordinarily not expressed, as such processes are nearly quantitative. This is observed in the modern marine system through the 1:1 correspondence between 𝛿15Nsedimentary and 𝛿15Nnitrate (e.g. Fig. 34.6 – ref.23). Therefore, nitrogen isotopes typically trace the balance between N2-fixation and heterotrophic denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation, with the latter two being highly redox dependent being carried out under sub-oxic conditions24–26.

Geology

The Roper Group of northern Australia, is the younger of four unconformity-bound sedimentary packages of the much larger greater McArthur Basin27,28. Significant lateral thickness changes occur within the Roper Group. It is thin (~1–2 km) in the vicinity of the east-west trending Urapunga Fault Zone, of moderate thickness over the Broadmere Inversion Structure (~2 km29), and thinnest (<500 m) over the north–south trending Batten Fault Zone (Fig. 1A)28,30–32. Southwest of the Batten Fault Zone, the Roper Group thickens to >5 km in the Beetaloo Sub-basin28,30–33 (Fig. 1A), which is interpreted to represent the main depo-centre of the Roper Seaway30,32.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Regional geology and stratigraphic sequence. (A) Distribution of sedimentary basins of northern Australia. (B) Stratigraphic column for the Roper Group showing major transgressive-regressive sequences. Reproduced from ref.36.

The Velkerri Formation, a black-shale dominated unit within the Roper Group, is a key environmental archive for the early–middle Mesoproterozoic due to its exceptional thickness, well-constrained age (1386 ± 13 Ma to 1361 ± 21 Ma34,35), large variations in organic carbon content, and low metamorphic grade36,37. Prior work has shown that the Velkerri Formation hosts some of the oldest known ‘live‘ hydrocarbon occurrences38, and continues to generate substantial interest as an unconventional gas play, with an estimated in place gas resource of 118 trillion cubic feet37. Recent production testing has resulted in the successful hydraulic fracturing of this Mesoproterozoic formation resulting in substantial gas flows39 making this one of the oldest proven unconventional hydrocarbon plays.

The Velkerri Formation is the initial deep water facies of the Veloak sequence30 (Fig. 1B), which comprises the dominantly basinal facies of the Velkerri Formation transitioning up-section into cross-bedded sandstones of the Moroak Sandstone (Fig. 1B). The Velkerri Formation is formally divided into three distinct members, the Kalala (lower), Amungee (middle) and Wyworrie (upper) members40. The Amungee Member is the principal black shale facies with total organic carbon contents reaching ~10%36,37.

Detailed sedimentary petrology of the Amungee Member has shown that the facies was deposited below storm weather wave base and is composed of thinly laminated, grey-green to dark grey clays, pale grey silts and rare, fine-grained sands40,41. Organic enrichment within the Amungee Member occurs principally as three prominent horizons that are informally referred to as the A, B and C organofacies. Gamma Ray Spectra (GRS) reveals that these organofacies are a feature of the Amungee Member at the regional scale (Fig. 2). The organic-rich and organic-poor intervals show no systematic relationship to either grain size or minerology (Fig. 3). Based on this observation it was noted that the organic-rich and organic-poor intervals do not reflect changes in the energy of deposition or water depth, but must reflect changing water column biochemistry41.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Gamma ray spectra (GRS) for regionally distributed sections of the Velkerri Formation. See Fig. 1 for well locations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Stratigraphic log of the Altree 2 well along with full gamma ray spectra. (B) Relative abundance of major mineral groupings based on high resolution XRD analysis of the Altree 2 well. (C) TOC overlain on expanded gamma ray spectra for Altree 2.

Methods

Samples

Samples were obtained from the petroleum well Altree-2 drilled by Pacific Oil and Gas and now housed in the Northern Territory Geological Surveys core facility in Darwin, N.T. The Velkerri Formation, which forms the basis of this study was intercepted at depths between 391.72 m and 1229.65 m. Rock samples were broken into ~2 cm3 fragments and the resulting chips where milled in a tungsten carbide mill until the powder could pass through a 75 µm mesh resulting in a homogenous sample powder.

Bulk rock pyrolysis

Pyrolysis measurements were undertaken using a Weatherfords SRA. Crucibles were loaded into the carousel and heated under inert nitrogen in both the pyrolysis (to obtain S1, S2, Tmax and S3 peaks) and oxidation ovens (to obtain the S4 peak). The pyrolysis oven was first held at 300 °C for 5 minutes and ramped at 25 °C per minute from 300 °C to 650 °C. The oxidation oven was held at 400 °C for 3 minutes, ramped at 20 °C per minute from 400 °C to 850 °C and held at 850 °C for 5 minutes. The flame ionisation detector (FID) was calibrated by running IFP standard ‘160000’ in ‘standard’ mode. The IR Analysers were calibrated against standard gas with known concentration of CO2 and CO. An analysis blank was run as ‘blank’ mode with the sample batch and the blank data was automatically subtracted from all analyses. An internal standard was also run first with each batch to ensure the instrument status. The results were processed with Optkin 3.0 software where peak heights and geochemical indices including Total organic carbon (TOC), Oxygen Index (OI), Hydrogen Index (HI) and Production Index (PI) are automatically calculated.

XRD analysis

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was undertaken on the raw powder utilising a Bruker D4 XRD. Quantification of the multiphase mixtures using Rietveld quantitative analysis was undertaken using the DIFFRAC™ software suite.

Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses

1 to 2 grams of sample powder were treated with excess 3N HCl for 24 hours to remove trace carbonate minerals. Insoluble residual was centrifuged and rinsed with deionized water until supernatant achieved a pH of 4. Isotopic analyses for nitrogen and carbon were performed using a Euro EA Elemental Analyzer coupled to a Nu Horizons continuous-flow stable isotope mass spectrometer. Analyses were performed in the stable isotope laboratory at the University of Adelaide. Powdered, decarbonated samples were weighed and sealed in tin capsules for isotopic analysis and were combusted at 1050 °C. Data are reported using delta notation relative to atmospheric N2 for nitrogen and the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite International Standard (V-PDB) for carbon. 𝛿15N were calibrated to international reference standards IAEA N1, N2, NO-3, and USGS 25, 32, 40 and 41. 𝛿13C was calibrated to IAEA CH-6 and CH-7; USGS 24, 40, and 41; and NBS-22. Standard deviation for bulk samples is 0.15 for 𝛿13C and 0.1 for 𝛿15N.

Results

We analysed 30 samples (Figs. 4 and 5) from the Velkerri Formation at a sampling resolution of 1 sample every ~11m. 𝛿15Nbulk varies from +1.04‰ to +2.67‰ while 𝛿13Corg varies from −35.2‰ to −32.4‰. Statistically significant correlations exist between 𝛿15Nbulk, 𝛿13Corg, and TOC (at α = 0.05). Atomic C:N ratios range from 17.2 to 49.8.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) 𝛿13Corg vs. 𝛿15Nbulk, (B) 𝛿15Nbulk vs. TOC and (C) 𝛿13Corg vs. TOC. R values are Spearman Correlation co-efficient and all are significant at α = 0.05. Two tailed p values are 0.0182, 0.0112 and 0.0036 respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Up-section variations in 𝛿15Nbulk (A) and 𝛿13Corg (B) along with a gamma ray spectrum.

Alteration

While it has been shown that changes in the nitrogen isotope characteristics of organic matter can occur during particle sinking and diagenesis (e.g. ref.42), it has also been shown that in high sediment accumulation zones, such as continental margins, no significant alteration of primary 𝛿15N occurs43–45. Furthermore, unaltered bulk sedimentary 𝛿15N generally reflects the 𝛿15N of bioavailable nitrogen23. While such work provides confidence in the fidelity of 𝛿15N of organic-rich sediments, we have investigated the possibility of alteration, focussing on relationships between 𝛿15N and thermal maturity, hydrocarbon generation, migration and devolatilisation (Fig. 6A–C), and find no evidence for the systematic alteration of 𝛿15N via these processes. Furthermore, relationships between nitrogen abundance (N%), carbon abundance (C%) (Fig. 6D) and K2O concentrations (%) (Fig. 6E) suggest that sources of inorganic nitrogen or exchangeable NH4+ are negligible.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Possible secondary alteration of primary 𝛿15N signatures due to (A) thermal maturity, (B) hydrocarbon generation and/or migration, (C) nitrogen devolatilisation, (D) presence of inorganic nitrogen and (E) exchangeable nitrogen.

Discussion

Basin dynamics, primary productivity, redox, trace nutrients and the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle

Measured nitrogen isotopes for the Velkerri Formation vary between +1.04‰ and +2.67‰, while measures of central tendency for this basinal facies have values that fall close to +2‰ (Fig. 7). Only a single sample has an isotopic value of ~+1‰, a value that reasonably could be attributed solely to N2 fixation (i.e. −3‰ to +1‰18), all other samples have 𝛿15N values ≥+2‰, which are values consistent with aerobic nitrogen cycling16. Significantly, these variations in 𝛿15N are not random but show statistically significant cycling at the 95% confidence level at a wavelength of ~110m (see Supplementary Information) and show consistent positive covariation with 𝛿13Corg, TOC (Fig. 4) and GRS (Fig. 5). Considering that these cyclic changes in TOC and GRS are a regional feature of the basin, variations in 𝛿15N and 𝛿13Corg provide a basis for understanding the development of the observed cyclic organofacies.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Measures of central tendency with 95% confidence intervals along with absolute minimum and maximum 𝛿15N values. Field for Mo-Nitrogenese biomass is from ref.18.

Lateral gradients in bioavailable nitrogen

One possible explanation for the up-section variation we observe in 𝛿15N could be that they represent lateral gradients in 𝛿15N from near shore to offshore environments. Stüeken46 argued for a lateral gradient in 𝛿15N based on samples from the Mesoproterozoic Belt Supergroup. In this study, 𝛿15N values varied from ~−1‰ in offshore basinal facies to ~+5‰ in near-shore facies. This trend was interpreted to reflect a transition from more productive coastal environments with active aerobic nitrogen cycling to nitrate poor offshore environments dominated by nitrogen fixation. A similar study for the Roper Group47 identified a similar lateral gradient between platform (n = 4) and basinal (n = 8) facies, however, unlike the Belt Basin, 𝛿15N values between basinal (n = 8) and shelf (n = 22) facies were statistically indistinguishable (Fig. 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(A) 𝛿13C vs. 𝛿15N. (B,C) Average and 95% confidence intervals for platform (yellow), shelf (blue), and basinal (black) facies for the Roper Group (ref.47). Red data are from this study.

Due to the near-shore–offshore lateral gradients observed in 𝛿15N in some Mesoproterozoic basins46,47, it raises the possibility that the cycles observed in 𝛿15N (Fig. 5A) represent subtle changes in water depth reflecting subtle changes in a lateral 𝛿15N gradient. However, we think this is unlikely, as neither this study or previous studies30,41 have shown any evidence for changes in water depth within the Amungee Member of the Velkerri Formation. Furthermore, the overall coarsening-upward sequence of the Velkerri Formation is well documented30,36,41 and a prediction of this near shore-offshore gradient would be that both 𝛿15N and 𝛿13C should be isotopically heavier up-section (e.g. Fig. 8B & C), this is not observed (Fig. 5). However, our basinal facies are isotopically identical to basinal Velkerri samples from the wider basin and distinct from shallow water facies, this would indicate that the organic enrichment of the Amungee Member of the Velkerri Formation is unlikely to be due to organic matter transported from shallower (i.e. shelf or platform, Fig. 8) near-shore environments, contrasting with previous suggestions33.

Partial assimilation and/or partial nitrification

If lateral variations do not provide a satisfactory explanation for the observed 𝛿15N values, what mechanism can produce the observed range in 𝛿15N, especially values greater than +2‰? Partial assimilation of bioavailable nitrogen could generate isotopically heavy 𝛿15N as partial assimilation of NH4+ leaves behind a residual pool of isotopically heavy nitrogen48. Furthermore, as assimilation of bioavailable nitrogen goes to completion in the modern nitrogen limited ocean42,49, it is unclear why partial assimilation would be a widespread characteristic considering the low levels of dissolved molybdenum estimated for the Mesoproterozoic50. Furthermore, modern analogues of Mesoproterozoic basins, such as the Black Sea and Cariaco Basins, also do not preserve evidence for partial assimilation49,51.

Partial nitrification of remineralised NH4+ also has the ability to generate a 15N enriched residual pool52. However, considering that nitrification is rapid and occurs at vanishingly low levels of O253, it is expected to go to completion as nitrogen is widely considered the proximal limiting nutrient10,12.

Denitrification

A possible candidate to produce isotopically heavy 𝛿15N would be partial denitrification either via heterotrophic denitrification and/or anaerobic ammonium oxidation. As denitrification occurs under low oxygen conditions, and water column redox is, in part, determined by the export and remineralisation of organic carbon from overlying surface waters, a dynamic feedback between organic matter production, export, remineralisation and denitrification can be envisaged. Furthermore, recent experimental results have shown that the rate of denitrification increases with increasing organic matter flux through the supply of fresh labile organic matter14. Such a dynamic feedback would provide a viable mechanism for producing cyclic enrichments in organic carbon, similar to those observed in the Velkerri Formation.

Reduction in nitrogen fixation

A further mechanism for generating isotopically heavy nitrogen was proposed by Anbar and Knoll11, who speculated that the redox sensitive behaviour of molybdenum, coupled with its role as a cofactor associated within MoFe-nitrogenase, the dominant and most efficient enzyme responsible for nitrogen fixation in diazotrophs54–56, may have implications bioavailable nitrogen (Mo-N co-limitation).

The basis for Mo-N co-limitation is that under oxic conditions molybdenum occurs as the soluble molybdate ion (MoO42−), however, under euxinic conditions, molybdenum reacts strongly with hydrogen sulphide to form the particle reactive thiomolybdate ion57. Thiomolybdates can be removed from seawater in organo-metallic complexes or within sulphide phases, resulting in molybdenum limitation. Recent work has shown that N2 fixation rates are reduced by ~80% at dissolved molybdenum concentrations between 1–5 nM58,59, such values are in the predicted range of dissolved molybdenum concentrations of Mesoproterozoic oceans50.

While it has been argued that euxinia and nitrate are mutually exclusive60, Stüeken et al.16 pointed out that isotopically heavy 𝛿15N has been documented in numerous Archean and Proterozoic basins inferred to have experienced euxinia, and suggested nitrate and euxinia are likely compatible in highly stratified waters. Euxinic conditions have been suggested in the Roper basin36,61. In particular, Cox et al.36 noted enrichment in molybdenum in Velkerri sediments (up to ~100 ppm, twice the Mesoproterozoic average50) while biomarker studies62 identified dibenzothiophene within the Amungee Member which at the very least suggests sulfate reduction within the sediments, however, together support transient deep-water euxinic conditions57,63–65.

Based on the boundaries for euxinia defined for the Velkerri Formation (~25 ppm Mo and ~4% TOC36), the comparison between molybdenum and 𝛿15N reveals two distinct populations (Fig. 9). Samples with molybdenum concentrations below 25 ppm show variations in 𝛿15N between ~+1‰ to ~+2.5‰. In contrast, samples containing more than 25 ppm molybdenum have 𝛿15N exclusively above ~+2‰. Both a 2-tail t-test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test reveal that these two populations are statistically distinct (p = 0.0002 at α = 0.05).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

(A) Molybdenum vs. TOC and (B) 𝛿15N vs. Mo. Euxinic conditions are interpreted to exist at molybdenum concentrations above 25 ppm and TOC above 4% from ref.36.

Typically, the shifting balance between nitrogen supply via N2 fixation (source of isotopically light 𝛿15N) and its loss via denitrification (producing isotopically heavy 𝛿15N residual pool) is thought to be largely governed by basin redox conditions15,16,66. The dichotomy in the distribution of 𝛿15N and molybdenum (Fig. 9) suggests that in those samples containing >25 ppm molybdenum, the balance between N2 fixation and denitrification was heavily biased towards denitrification. Considering the evidence for euxinia36,62, a parsimonious explanation would be molybdenum limitation affecting N2 fixation rates.

Dynamic interplay between primary producers, basin redox and nitrogen cycling

Partial assimilation and/or nitrification seem unlikely candidates controlling the variations observed in our 𝛿15N record. Furthermore, while the range of 𝛿15N values are completely consistent with values associated with offshore basinal facies (e.g. refs.46,47), the cyclic variations cannot be explained by this mechanism, as it is incompatible with the detailed sedimentology of the Amungee Member and the overall high stand systems track for the Velkerri Formation.

The model proposed here envisages that during periods of high nutrient supply, as argued for the Amungee Member36, a cyclic process developed with high primary productivity and burial driving increasing levels of denitrification (i.e. ref.14). This process is suggested to have led to overall nitrogen limitation as denitrification ultimately depletes bioavailable nitrogen. However, the dichotomy in the distribution of 𝛿15N and Mo (Fig. 9) and evidence for deep water euxinia suggests that a reduction in the concentration of dissolved molybdenum likely restricted N2 fixation as well through Mo-N co-limitation.

The consequence of increased denitrification and reduced N2 fixation is a reduction in primary productivity due to nitrogen limitation, a reduction in organic matter export/remineralisation and an easing of euxinic conditions. This ultimately resulted in increased levels of dissolved molybdenum, which shifted the balance towards renewed N2 fixation. Such a sequence of events is interpreted to have produced the cyclic variations between light and heavy 𝛿15N along with positive covariations in TOC and 𝛿13C seen in the Amungee Member.

While this discussion has centred around nitrogen, carbon isotopes also support this model. For the same reasons given for variations in 𝛿15N, 𝛿13C variations do not reflect lateral environmental gradients in 𝛿13C. They exhibit a positive correlation with TOC and as peaks in 𝛿15N and TOC are associated with the most isotopically heavy 𝛿13C, it is likely that these 𝛿13C variations reflect changes in dissolved inorganic carbon, or more specifically, variations in contemporaneous organic carbon burial (ƒorg), which likely reflect the strength of primary productivity. These systematic positive covariations (𝛿15N, 𝛿13C, TOC, Mo) can be explained, ultimately, by changes in the balance between N2 fixation and denitrification resulting from the dynamic interaction between primary productivity, basin redox and biological metabolisms associated with nitrogen cycling. This biogeochemical model does not preclude higher order controls on the observed cyclicity such as orbital forcing mechanisms, however, available age constraints do not allow for a robust testing of such a higher order mechanism.

Conclusions

Cyclic behaviour in organic matter enrichment within the Mesoproterozoic Velkerri Formation is not associated with maximum flooding surfaces or to variations in mineralogy or clastic flux. Nitrogen and carbon isotopes along with molybdenum concentrations record the shifting balance between N2 fixation and denitrification pathways which can be related to high levels of organic carbon production, export and variations in basin redox, specifically shifts between sub-oxic to euxinic conditions. The requirement of molybdenum in biological N2 fixation along with the efficient scavenging of molybdenum under euxinic conditions results in Mo-N co-limitation and a decrease in primary productivity. These feedbacks highlight the dynamic interplay between primary producers, basin redox and biogeochemical nitrogen cycling. Such interactions are important in constraining productivity in the marine biosphere and highlight that high levels of primary productivity and euxinia are inherently self-limiting. Furthermore, such feedbacks are important in understanding the development of Precambrian hydrocarbon source rocks, and more generally in understanding oxygenation of the ocean and atmosphere through Earth history; as all are ultimately related to organic carbon burial.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (842.7KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

GMC and MLB are supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage grant (LP16010135). Linkage grant partners include Santos, Origin Energy, Imperial Oil and Gas, University of Adelaide, Wollongong University, the Czech Academy of Sciences and the Northern Territory Geological Survey. All partners are thanked for access to core and other resources.

Author Contributions

G.M.C. conceived the project and interpreted the data. All authors contributed in the writing of the manuscript and supplementary material.

Data Availability

All data that underlies this study can be found in Tables 1 through 3 in the accompanying supplementary information. Details of the well Altree-2 can be found at http://www.geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/79405.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-40783-4.

References

  • 1.Pedersen TF, Calvert SE. Anoxia vs productivity; what controls the formation of organic-carbon-rich sediments and sedimentary rocks? Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 1990;74:454–466. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Condie KC, Des Marais DJ, Abbott D. Precambrian superplumes and supercontinents: a record in black shales, carbon isotopes, and paleoclimates? Precambrian Res. 2001;106:239–260. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00097-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meyer KM, Kump LR. Oceanic Euxinia in Earth History: Causes and Consequences. Annu. Rev. Earth. Planet. Sci. 2008;36:251–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hartnett HE, Keil RG, Hedges JI, Devol AH. Influence of oxygen exposure time on organic carbon preservation in continental margin sediments. Nature. 1998;391:572–575. doi: 10.1038/35351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kennedy MJ, Pevear DR, Hill RJ. Mineral Surface Control of Organic Carbon in Black Shale. Science. 2002;295:657–660. doi: 10.1126/science.1066611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mayer LM. Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in continental shelf sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1994;58:1271–1284. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90381-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hedges JI, Keil RG. Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an assessment and speculative synthesis. Marine Chemistry. 1995;49:81–115. doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(95)00008-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Müller PJ, Suess E. Productivity, sedimentation rate, and sedimentary organic matter in the oceans—I. Organic carbon preservation. Deep Sea Research Part A Oceanographic Research Papers. 1979;26:1347–1362. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(79)90003-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Falkowski PG. Evolution of the nitrogen cycle and its influence on the biological sequestration of CO2 in the ocean. Nature. 1997;387:272–275. doi: 10.1038/387272a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tyrrell T. The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production. Nature. 1999;400:525–531. doi: 10.1038/22941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anbar AD, Knoll AH. Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: a bioinorganic bridge? Science. 2002;297:1137–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1069651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bristow LA, Mohr W, Ahmerkamp S, Kuypers MMM. Nutrients that limit growth in the ocean. Current Biology. 2017;27:R474–R478. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnston DT, et al. An emerging picture of Neoproterozoic ocean chemistry: Insights from the Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, USA. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010;290:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Babbin AR, Keil RG, Devol AH, Ward BB. Organic Matter Stoichiometry, Flux, and Oxygen Control Nitrogen Loss in the Ocean. Science. 2014;344:406. doi: 10.1126/science.1248364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ader M, et al. Interpretation of the nitrogen isotopic composition of Precambrian sedimentary rocks: Assumptions and perspectives. Chemical Geology. 2016;429:93–110. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stüeken EE, Kipp MA, Koehler MC, Buick R. The evolution of Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. Earth-Science Reviews. 2016;160:220–239. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Planavsky NJ, et al. Widespread iron-rich conditions in the mid-Proterozoic ocean. Nature. 2011;477:448–451. doi: 10.1038/nature10327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bauersachs T, et al. Nitrogen isotopic fractionation associated with growth on dinitrogen gas and nitrate by cyanobacteria. Limnology and Oceanography. 2009;54:1403–1411. doi: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.4.1403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wade, E. Nitrogen Isotope Fractionation and Its Significance in Biogeochemical Processes Occurring in Marine Environments. In: Goldberg ED, Horibe T, Saruhashi K (eds). Isotope Marine Chemistry: Uchida Rokakuho (1980).
  • 20.Brunner B, et al. Nitrogen isotope effects induced by anammox bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:18994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310488110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoch MP, Fogel ML, Kirchman DL. Isotope fractionation associated with ammonium uptake by a marine bacterium. Limnology and Oceanography. 1992;37:1447–1459. doi: 10.4319/lo.1992.37.7.1447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McCready. RGL, Gould WD, Barendregt RW. Nitrogen isotope fractionation during the reduction of NO3− to NH4+ by Desulfovibrio sp. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1993;29:231–234. doi: 10.1139/m83-038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Galbraith E. D., Sigman D. M., Robinson R. S. & Pedersen T. F. Chapter 34 - Nitrogen in Past Marine Environments. Nitrogen in the Marine Environment (2nd Edition). Academic Press: San Diego, 1497–1535 (2008).
  • 24.Lam P, et al. Revising the nitrogen cycle in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:4752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812444106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prokopenko MG, et al. Nitrogen cycling in the sediments of Santa Barbara basin and Eastern Subtropical North Pacific: Nitrogen isotopes, diagenesis and possible chemosymbiosis between two lithotrophs (Thioploca and Anammox)—“riding on a glider”. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006;242:186–204. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sigman DM, et al. The dual isotopes of deep nitrate as a constraint on the cycle and budget of oceanic fixed nitrogen. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2009;56:1419–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rawlings DJ. Stratigraphic resolution of a multiphase intracratonic basin system: the McArthur Basin, northern Australia. Aust. Jour. of Earth. Sci. 1999;46:703–723. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0952.1999.00739.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jackson, M. J., Muir, M. D. & Plumb, K. A. Geology of the southern McArthur Basin, Northern Territory. Bureau of Mineral Resouces, Geology and Geophysics (1987).
  • 29.Lindsay JF. Basin dynamics and mineralisation, McArthur Basin, northern Australia. Aust. Jour. of Earth. Sci. 2001;48:703–720. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0952.2001.00892.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abbott ST, Sweet IP. Tectonic control on third‐order sequences in a siliciclastic ramp‐style basin: An example from the Roper Superbasin (Mesoproterozoic), northern Australia. Aust. Jour. of Earth. Sci. 2000;47:637–657. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0952.2000.00795.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rawlings D. J. et al. The 2002 Southern McArthur Basin Seismic Reflection Survey. Geoscience Australia (2004).
  • 32.Plumb KA, Wellman P. McArthur Basin, Northern Territory: mapping of deep troughs using gravity and magnetic anomalies. BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics. 1997;10:243–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sheridan M, Johns RD, Johnson HD, Menpes S. The stratigraphic architecture, distribution and hydrocarbon potential of the organic-rich Kyalla and Velkerri shales of the Upper Roper Group (McArthur Basin) The APPEA Journal. 2018;58:858–864. doi: 10.1071/AJ17224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kendall B, Creaser RA, Gordon GW, Anbar AD. Re–Os and Mo isotope systematics of black shales from the Middle Proterozoic Velkerri and Wollogorang Formations, McArthur Basin, northern Australia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2009;73:2534–2558. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang B, et al. Spatial and temporal variation in detrital zircon age provenance of the hydrocarbon-bearing upper Roper Group, Beetaloo Sub-basin, Northern Territory, Australia. Precambrian Res. 2018;304:140–155. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2017.10.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cox GM, et al. Basin redox and primary productivity within the Mesoproterozoic Roper Seaway. Chemical Geology. 2016;440:101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.06.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Revie, D. Unconventional petroleum resources of the Roper Group, McArthur Basin. Northern Territory Geological Survey: Darwin (2016).
  • 38.Jackson MJ, Powell TG, Summons RE, Sweet IP. Hydrocarbon shows and petroleum source rocks in sediments as old as 1.7 x 109 years. Nature. 1986;322:727–729. doi: 10.1038/322727a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Close, D. I. et al. Proterozoic shales gas plays in the Beetaloo Basin and the Amungee NW-1H discovery. AGES 2017. Alice Springs: Northern Territory Geological Survey. 91–97 (2017).
  • 40.Munson, T. J. & Revie, D. Stratigraphic subdivision of Velkerri Formation, Roper Group, McArthur Basin, Northern Territory. Northern Territory Geological Survey Record 2018–006 (2018).
  • 41.Warren JK, George SC, Hamilton PJ, Tingate P. Proterozoic Source Rocks: Sedimentology and Organic Characteristics of the Velkerri Formation, Northern Territory, Australia. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 1998;82:442–443. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Altabet MA, Francois R. Sedimentary nitrogen isotopic ratio as a recorder for surface ocean nitrate utilization. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 1994;8:103–116. doi: 10.1029/93GB03396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Altabet, M. A. Nitrogen and Carbon Isotopic Tracers of the Source and Transformation of Particles in the Deep Sea. In: Ittekkot V (ed). Particle Flux in the Ocean. John Wiley: New York, pp 155–171 (1996).
  • 44.Kienast SS, Calvert SE, Pedersen TF. Nitrogen isotope and productivity variations along the northeast Pacific margin over the last 120 kyr: Surface and subsurface paleoceanography. Paleoceanography. 2002;17:1–17. doi: 10.1029/2001PA000650. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thunell RC, Sigman DM, Muller-Karger F, Astor Y, Varela R. Nitrogen isotope dynamics of the Cariaco Basin, Venezuela. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2004;18:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stüeken EE. A test of the nitrogen-limitation hypothesis for retarded eukaryote radiation: Nitrogen isotopes across a Mesoproterozoic basinal profile. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2013;120:121–139. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Koehler MC, Stüeken EE, Kipp MA, Buick R, Knoll AH. Spatial and temporal trends in Precambrian nitrogen cycling: A Mesoproterozoic offshore nitrate minimum. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2017;198:315–337. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.10.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Casciotti KL. Inverse kinetic isotope fractionation during bacterial nitrite oxidation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2009;73:2061–2076. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fulton, J. M., Arthur, M. A. & Freeman, K. H. Black Sea nitrogen cycling and the preservation of phytoplankton δ15N signals during the Holocene. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 26 (2012).
  • 50.Reinhard CT, et al. Proterozoic ocean redox and biogeochemical stasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:5357–5362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208622110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Haug GH, et al. Glacial/interglacial variations in production and nitrogen fixation in the Cariaco Basin during the last 580 kyr. Paleoceanography. 2010;13:427–432. doi: 10.1029/98PA01976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Casciotti KL, Sigman DM, Ward BB. Linking Diversity and Stable Isotope Fractionation in Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria. Geomicrobiology Journal. 2003;20:335–353. doi: 10.1080/01490450303895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fuchsman CA, Murray JW, Konovalov SK. Concentration and natural stable isotope profiles of nitrogen species in the Black Sea. Marine Chemistry. 2008;111:90–105. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2008.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Burgess BK, Lowe DJ. Mechanism of Molybdenum Nitrogenase. Chemical Reviews. 1996;96:2983–3012. doi: 10.1021/cr950055x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hoffman BM, Lukoyanov D, Yang Z-Y, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC. Mechanism of Nitrogen Fixation by Nitrogenase: The Next Stage. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114:4041–4062. doi: 10.1021/cr400641x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Joerger RD, Bishop PE, Evans HJ. Bacterial Alternative Nitrogen Fixation Systems. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 1988;16:1–14. doi: 10.3109/10408418809104465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Scott C, Lyons TW. Contrasting molybdenum cycling and isotopic properties in euxinic versus non-euxinic sediments and sedimentary rocks: Refining the paleoproxies. Chemical Geology. 2012;324–325:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zerkle AL, House CH, Cox RP, Canfield DE. Metal limitation of cyanobacterial N2 fixation and implications for the Precambrian nitrogen cycle. Geobiology. 2006;4:285–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2006.00082.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Glass J, Axler R, Chandra S, Goldman C. Molybdenum limitation of microbial nitrogen assimilation in aquatic ecosystems and pure cultures. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2012;3:331. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Boyle RA, et al. Nitrogen cycle feedbacks as a control on euxinia in the mid-Proterozoic ocean. Nature Comms. 2013;4:1533. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shen Y, Canfield DE, Knoll AH. Middle Proterozoic ocean chemistry: Evidence from the McArthur Basin, northern Australia. Amer. Jour. of Sci. 2002;302:81–109. doi: 10.2475/ajs.302.2.81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jarrett, A. J. et al. Microbial assemblage and palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the 1.38 Ga Velkerri Formation, McArthur Basin, northern Australia. Geobiology. 00, 1–21 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Lyons TW, Anbar AD, Severmann S, Scott C, Gill BC. Tracking Euxinia in the Ancient Ocean: A Multiproxy Perspective and Proterozoic Case Study. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 2009;37:507–534. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tribovillard N, Algeo TJ, Lyons T, Riboulleau A. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: An update. Chemical Geology. 2006;232:12–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mizukami T, Kaiho K, Oba M. Significant changes in land vegetation and oceanic redox across the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2013;369:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.09.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zerkle AL, Mikhail S. The geobiological nitrogen cycle: From microbes to the mantle. Geobiology. 2017;15:343–352. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (842.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All data that underlies this study can be found in Tables 1 through 3 in the accompanying supplementary information. Details of the well Altree-2 can be found at http://www.geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/79405.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES