Skip to main content
Journal of Women's Health logoLink to Journal of Women's Health
editorial
. 2017 Apr 1;26(4):303–304. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6382

Postpartum Health of Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Call to Action

Monika Mitra 1,
PMCID: PMC6436018  PMID: 28355095

Until the 1970s, involuntary sterilization and institutionalization in the United States frequently prevented women with intellectual and developmental disabilities from becoming pregnant. Deinstitutionalization led to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities living in community settings in unprecedented numbers. With growing community participation and reduced stigma of disability, increasing numbers of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are seeking to become pregnant and bear children. In fact, a recent study found comparable fertility rates between women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities.1

A small but growing body of literature suggests women with intellectual and developmental disabilities experience more medical complications during pregnancy and are at elevated risk for adverse maternal and birth outcomes.1–4 Our previous work in this area suggests that deliveries to women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes, including preterm delivery, very low and low birth weight babies, and low Apgar scores.5 Compared with nondisabled women, women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are less likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester and less likely to breastfeed at the time of their discharge from the hospital. A recent national study found that U. S. women with intellectual and developmental disabilities were more likely to have cesarean deliveries and longer delivery-related hospital stays.6 In an examination of the needs of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities during pregnancy and childbirth, Potvin et al. identified the need for formal and informal social support for expectant women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.7 The tenuous health of expectant women with intellectual and developmental disabilities, their high rates of antenatal hospitalization, risk for pregnancy complications, and increased odds for adverse birth outcomes make it important to examine the health of these women during the postpartum period. However, to date there have been no population-based studies examining the postpartum health and healthcare experiences among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

In this issue of the Journal of Women's Health, Brown and her colleagues present the first systematic examination of the risks of postpartum medical and psychiatric hospital admissions and emergency department visits among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities compared with women without these disabilities.8 Using linked population-based health and social service administrative data from Ontario, Canada, the authors found high rates of postpartum hospital admissions and emergency department visits among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and a significantly elevated risk of hospital utilizations for psychiatric reasons compared with medical reasons. Although, they acknowledge the inherent limitations in the use of administrative data, their careful analysis of hospital use in the period from delivery to 42 days post-discharge points to a need to improve postpartum follow-up efforts of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This type of follow-up is urgently needed, according to these findings, to prevent medical and psychiatric complications and subsequent high rates of hospital use. The authors cite the need for preventive postpartum guidelines that include a comprehensive postpartum care management plan, greater coordination between healthcare and other service providers, substantial supports between medical checkups, and more frequent, longer checkups during the postpartum period for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

The year following childbirth is a critical time for most mothers. It is marked by physical and emotional changes, the demands of taking care of a newborn, and an elevated risk of depression and other health problems.9–12 Maternal health during this time has significant and potentially lasting effects on the emotional and physical health of both mothers and their infants.13 Women during the postpartum period may be at risk for serious decline in their physical and mental health,9 and therefore are a vulnerable group requiring more preventive care postpartum.14 This period is likely more challenging for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have limited access to prenatal care,15 lack social and emotional support during postpartum periods,16 face significant disparities in maternal and birth outcomes,5 and are constrained by unique barriers to sexual and reproductive knowledge and healthcare.16 In addition to these challenges, women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are faced with significant discrimination that likely reflects societal bias against them. Approximately 30%–80% of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities have their children permanently removed by child welfare agencies.17–19

Given these findings and the analysis by Brown et al.,8 the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendation of one postpartum visit within six weeks of delivery20 is woefully inadequate for this population of women.21 In the current edition of the Guidelines to Perinatal Care,20 except for women with medical, obstetric, or intercurrent complications, postpartum mothers are expected to visit their physician for one postpartum visit 4–6 weeks after delivery. Critical for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are anticipatory guidance for postpartum provided during pregnancy, including a postpartum care plan that identifies the postpartum care team for the woman and her infant with written instructions and contact information of the postpartum care team provided at the time of discharge from maternity care.21 Revision to the current guidelines21 should include appropriate emphasis of these steps for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

The collective research findings serve as a clarion call to change the ACOG recommendations and modify the Medicaid reimbursement policy for postpartum visits for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. A change in Medicaid policy is imperative given that 75%–80% of deliveries among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities were to women with public insurance.5

These findings also underscore the need for a deeper understanding of the unmet needs, experiences, and expectations of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities during this potentially tumultuous period of their lives. Better understanding of their unmet needs and barriers to healthcare and social supports during the postpartum period would substantively inform the design and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Recent efforts in the United States to understand and improve systems of care during the postpartum period have excluded the needs of women with disabilities, specifically women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.9 We hope this examination by Brown et al.8 and other research1–5,7,22 can inform the inclusion of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the national efforts to improve the health and wellness of new mothers and infants.

Author Disclosure Statement

Dr. Mitra is supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD082105. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Brown HK, Lunsky Y, Wilton AS, Cobigo V, Vigod SN. Pregnancy in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Obst Gynaecol Can 2016;38:9–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brown HK, Cobigo V, Lunsky Y, Dennis CL, Vigod S. Perinatal health of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and comorbid mental illness. Can J Psych 2016;61:714–723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown HK, Cobigo V, Lunsky Y, Vigod SN. Maternal and offspring outcomes in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A population‐based cohort study. BJOG 2016;124:757–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown HK, Kirkham YA, Cobigo V, Lunsky Y, Vigod SN. Labour and delivery interventions in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A population-based cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:238–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mitra M, Parish SL, Clements KM, Cui X, Diop H. Pregnancy outcomes among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Am J Prev Med 2015;48:300–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parish SL, Mitra M, Son E, Bonardi A, Swoboda PT, Igdalsky L. Pregnancy outcomes among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 2015;120:433–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Potvin LA, Brown HK, Cobigo V. Social support received by women with intellectual and developmental disabilities during pregnancy and childbirth: An exploratory qualitative study. Midwifery 2016;37:57–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown HK, Cobigo V, Lunsky Y, Vigod S. Postpartum acute care utilization among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2017;26:329–337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Verbiest S, Bonzon E, Handler A. Postpartum health and wellness: A call for quality woman-centered care. Matern Child Health J 2016;20:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aber C, Weiss M, Fawcett J. Contemporary women's adaptation to motherhood: The first 3 to 6 weeks postpartum. Nurs Sci Q 2013;26:344–351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burgio KL, Zyczynski H, Locher JL, Richter HE, Redden DT, Wright KC. Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1291–1298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major survey findings of listening to Mothers(SM) III: New mothers speak out. J Perinat Educ 2014;23:17–24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Young BC, Madden E, Bryant AS. What Happens after the Puerperium? Analysis of “Late” Postpartum Readmissions in California. Open J Obst Gynecol 2015;5:123 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kitzinger S. The fourth trimester? Midwife, Health Visitor & Community Nurse 1975;11:118–121 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McConnell D, Llewellyn G, Bye R. Providing services for parents with intellectual disability: Parent needs and service constraints. J Intellect Dev Disabil 1997;22:5–17 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Llewellyn G, McConnell D. Mothers with learning difficulties and their support networks. J Intellect Dis Res 2002;46:17–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McConnell D, Feldman M, Aunos M, Prasad N. Child maltreatment investigations involving parents with cognitive impairments in Canada. Child Maltreat 2010;16:21–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Booth T, Booth W, McConnell D. Care proceedings and parents with learning difficulties: Comparative prevalence and outcomes in an English and Australian court sample. Child Family Soc Work 2005;10:353–360 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mirfin-Veitch B, Bray A, Williams S, Clarkson J, Belton A. Supporting parents with intellectual disabilities. New Zealand J Dis Stud 1999;6:60–74 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Guidelines for perinatal care. American Academy of Pediatrics, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 21.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Optimizing postpartum care. Committee opinion no. 666. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:e187–e192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McConnell D, Mayes R, Llewellyn G. Women with intellectual disability at risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. J Intellect Dis Res 2008;52:529–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES