Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Mar 27;9:5273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41654-8

Modulation of the p75 neurotrophin receptor suppresses age-related basal forebrain cholinergic neuron degeneration

Youmei Xie 1, Rick B Meeker 1, Stephen M Massa 2, Frank M Longo 3,
PMCID: PMC6437186  PMID: 30918278

Abstract

Age-related degeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) is linked to cognitive impairment. The p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) has been proposed to mediate neuronal degeneration in aging. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that modifying p75NTR function would prevent or reverse aging-related neuronal degeneration using LM11A-31, a small molecule p75NTR modulator that downregulates degenerative and upregulates trophic receptor-associated signaling. Morphological analysis in mice showed loss of BFCN area detectable by 18 months of age. Oral administration of LM11A-31 from age 15 to 18 months resulted in a dose-related preservation of BFCN area and one month of treatment from 17 to 18 months also preserved cell area. To evaluate reversal of established neuronal atrophy, animals were treated from 21 to 25 months of age. Treatment was associated with an increase of cell size to a mean area larger than that observed at 18 months, accompanied by increases in mean MS/VDB neurite length, as well as increased cholinergic fiber density and synaptophysin pre-synaptic marker levels in the hippocampus. These findings support the idea that modulation of p75NTR activity can prevent and potentially reverse age-associated BFCN degeneration. Moreover, this may be achieved therapeutically with orally bioavailable agents such as LM11A-31.

Introduction

Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) provide cholinergic input to broad regions of the cortex and hippocampus in rodents, humans and other mammals1,2 which promotes synaptic plasticity and supports mechanisms serving attention, working memory and processing speed36. The importance of this cholinergic system has engendered substantial interest in the implications for cognitive function of BFCN degeneration that occurs during normal aging714 and in prodromal or early stages of Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases10,11,1422, Indeed, BFCNs are particularly vulnerable to age-related degeneration13 and that process is one of the major mechanisms proposed to underlie age-associated memory impairment (AAMI)5.

Age-related degeneration of BFCNs is reflected in several morphological changes, including somal atrophy, decreases in neurite length and target innervation9,2325 which have been found in aged rodents, non-human primates and humans. In some studies, age-related decreases in cholinergic innervation of hippocampal regions were not detected26,27. Measurements of BFCN numbers have been more variable, showing either no effect or decreases with aging9,10,26,28,29. In longitudinal volumetric MRI studies of healthy aging among cognitively intact human subjects, volume loss of basal forebrain structures is disproportionately greater than that occurring in overall grey matter11. Several molecular and functional changes have also been identified, including diminished neurofilament expression23, reduction of calbindin-D28K, Ca2++/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I and growth-associated protein-43, increased activation of µ-calpain and L-type calcium channels30, and increased phosphorylation of tau31. Further, there are deficits in the induction and maintenance of LTP32.

Multiple observations suggest that changes in neurotrophin (NT) signaling have a substantial role in age-related BFCN degeneration. NTs consist of a family of protein ligands that include nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) that are also present in pro-forms33,34. Each of the mature forms bind to its cognate tyrosine kinase receptor (TrkA, TrkB and TrkC, respectively) and to the common neurotrophin receptor known as p75NTR, while the pro-forms also bind the dual receptor complex of p75NTR and sortilin. Within the BFCN system, expression of TrkA and p75NTR is relatively high compared with other CNS cell populations29,35. With concomitant binding to the Trk/p75NTR receptors, or to Trk receptors alone, NTs in their mature forms generally have a neurotrophic effect. In its pro-form, NGF binding to p75NTR with reduced or absent TrkA interaction, promotes degenerative signaling and neuronal degeneration/death36,37. The finding of increased levels of proNGF in the hippocampus in aged rats38 raises the possibility that proNGF/p75NTR signaling contributes to age-related atrophy of neurons expressing p75NTR including BFCNs innervating the hippocampus39. In several contexts, p75NTR in its unliganded state also supports degenerative signaling suggesting a baseline anti-trophic effect. This is supported by studies in which transgenic mice lacking intact wild-type p75NTR, demonstrate increased size of BFCNs along with enhanced cholinergic innervation of the hippocampus, cortex and amygdala29,4044. The ability of antisense-mediated knockdown of p75NTR to enhance hippocampal cholinergic innervation further supports the findings from knockout studies45. Delivery of mature NGF to the CNS of aged rats4655 and non-human primates5661 results in reversal of age-related BFCN atrophy. However, in these studies of mature NGF, which functions through binding to both the TrkA and p75 receptors, the contributions of each receptor and their potential interactions were not evaluated. Thus, the potential for pharmacologically targeting p75NTR alone as a therapy for aging-related cognitive decline remains unexplored.

p75NTR small molecule ligands have been developed in attempts to both circumvent the pharmacokinetic shortcomings of large peptide ligands and to specifically target p75NTR receptor mechanisms independently of other NT receptors6266. One of these, LM11A-31, has been extensively characterized, and has been found to function as a p75NTR receptor modulator (rather than a simple agonist or antagonist) to shift p75NTR from neurodegenerative to neurotrophic signaling in neurons expressing p75NTR while having no detectable effect on TrkA64,67,68. In addition, LM11A-31 has also been shown to block proNGF binding to and activation of p75NTR receptor degenerative signaling64,69. In other studies, p75NTR-linked neurodegenerative signaling has been found to have a substantial overlap with neurodegenerative signaling likely to occur in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). LM11A-31 has been found to inhibit degenerative signaling in multiple in vitro and in vivo AD models67,7072 and is currently undergoing testing in a human phase 2a trial in AD (NCT03069014). A key question regarding the beneficial effects of LM11A-31 in AD models is whether these effects include counteracting the contributions of age-related degeneration per se. Addressing this question requires its application in a non-AD, age-based degeneration model. Moreover, the finding of a clinically viable compound with this profile would introduce a candidate for the treatment of age-related BFCN degeneration and thus possibly age-related cognitive impairment. In the current study, we applied LM11A-31 to test the hypothesis that small molecule modulation of p75NTR might slow or reverse BFCN neurodegeneration associated with natural aging.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Young adult and aged C57BL6 mice were purchased from Jackson labs and the National Institute of Aging colony (NIH, USA). These mice were housed individually at the University of North Carolina within a Division of Lab Animal Medicine-operated facility in a controlled, pathogen-free environment (constant temperature 22 ± 1 °C; humidity 50–60%; lights on 06:00–18:00 hr). Mice were housed with free access to food and water until the appropriate age (4, 9 and 11 months for young adult mice or 15, 18 and 24–25 months for aged mice). All experimental procedures were approved by the IACUC of the University of North Carolina and were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and compliance to PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

LM11A-31 administration

LM11A-31 was synthesized and purified in its HCl form to our specifications as previously described67. The compound was dissolved in deionized H2O to a concentration of 5 mg/ml and filter sterilized. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment or vehicle groups, were fasted overnight and LM11A-31 or an equivalent volume of vehicle (deionized water) was delivered once daily in the morning via oral gavage at a dose of 50 mg/kg (10 µl/g). In independent experiments with this dosing paradigm LM11A-31 reached a peak concentration of approximately 262 ng/ml or approximately 1.8 µM in brain with a t1/2 in brain of 3–4 hrs. At the 1 hr and subsequent time points the brain/plasma ratios were >170.

LM11A-31 treatment was initiated at 11, 15, 17 or 21 months. Three groups of mice were included at each time point–a young (4 months) comparator cohort, and aged groups given LM11A-31 or vehicle alone, with treatment durations of 1–4 months. One day after the final dose, mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused with saline followed by a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.01 M PBS in preparation for histochemical analysis. Estimates of the median effective dose (EC50) were obtained from non-linear regression analysis using the Graphpad Prism 5 log agonist vs response model.

Immunocytochemistry

Mice were euthanized under deep avertin anesthesia and perfused transcardially with phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 0.01 M phosphate buffer containing 0.9% sodium chloride, pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS). The brains were removed and post-fixed overnight (about 16 hr) in the same fixative. The brains were then soaked in 30% sucrose in PBS until they sank. Frozen coronal sections through the forebrain were cut on a sledge microtome (MICROM HM 430, Germany) at a thickness of 40 µM. Sections were stored in cryoprotectant at −20 °C until processing for immunocytochemistry.

Animals from each group were processed together for immunocytochemistry in parallel to provide matched controls and to minimize variation in staining. Every 6th section through the region of the medial septum and diagonal band nuclei was immunostained for choline acetyltransferase.

Briefly, free floating sections were washed in PBS and incubated for 30 min at room temperature (RT) in PBS containing 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were washed in PBS, permeabilized with 0.4% Triton-X100 in PBS for 30 min at RT, and then blocked for 60 min with PBS containing 3% normal rabbit serum, 3% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 hr at 4 °C. Sections were transferred to polyclonal goat anti-ChAT (Chemicon AB144P) at a 1:1000 dilution in PBS + 0.1% Triton + 3% normal serum for 24 hr at 4 °C then were washed three times and incubated in a biotinylated rabbit anti-goat IgG (Chemicon AP106) at 1:500 for 2 hr at 4 °C. Sections were washed and developed in avidin-biotinylated peroxidase solution (Vector Laboratories ABC kit 6100) with intensified diaminobenzidine (DAB) as the substrate (Vector Laboratories SK4100). After a final wash in PBS and deionized water, the sections were mounted on Superfrost/Plus Microscope Slides (Fisher Scientific PA 15219), dried overnight at RT, dehydrated in absolute ethanol, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with Mounting Medium #4111 (Richard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo MI). Slides from individual animals were randomized and coded so all subsequent analyses could be carried out in a blinded fashion with regard to age and treatment group.

Immunofluorescence

Every sixth section from control and treated animals was washed in PBS, incubated in 0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min at RT and then blocked for 60 min with 3% normal serum (Chemicon), 3% BSA (Sigma), and 0.1% Triton (Sigma) at 4 °C. Sections were transferred to polyclonal goat anti-ChAT (Chemicon/Millipore, AB144P) at 1:1000, or rabbit anti-MAP-2 (Millipore, AB5622) at 1:500 diluted in PBS + 0.1% Triton X100 + 3% normal serum for 24 hr at 4 °C. Visualization was accomplished using rabbit anti-goat Alexa488, donkey anti-mouse Alexa594 or donkey anti-rabbit Alexa594 (Molecular Probes Eugene, Oregon) at a dilution of 1:1000 for 1 hour at RT. Sections were rinsed in PBS and mounted on Superfrost/Plus Microscope Slides (Fisher Scientific PA 15219) with Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech 0100-01). Slides from individual animals were randomized and coded as above.

Western blot analysis

Animals were deeply anaesthetized with avertin and perfused transcardially with cold 0.9% NaCl for 6 min. Cortex and hippocampus were dissected from the brain and homogenized in RIPA Lysis Buffer (Millipore, 20–188) containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, P8340). Protein levels were determined by the Bradford protein assay (Biorad). Immunoblots were performed according to standard procedures. Briefly, 20 µg protein/lane were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with Tris buffered saline containing 0.2% Tween-20 and 5% milk powder, followed by an overnight incubation with mouse anti-synaptophysin (Millipore, MAB5258 1:1000) diluted in the blocking solution. After several rinses with Tris buffered saline/0.2% Tween 20, membranes were incubated with goat anti-mouse (1:10,000) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for 1 h at room temperature. To quantify the relative amount of proteins, the blots were stripped and re-probed with mouse anti-GAPDH, 1:2000 (Millipore, MAB374) for 1 h, followed by goat anti-mouse-HRP (1:10,000). Bands were visualized using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo, 34080) and quantified with UN-SCAN-IT gel software (Silk Scientific Inc).

Stereology

Digital images of the medial septum and diagonal band nuclei were collected on a Nikon MICROPHOT-FXA microscope equipped with a computer-controlled stepper motor stage that allowed movement in the x-, y- and z-axes. Images were collected and analyzed using Stereo Investigator 9.0 (MBF Bioscience Williston, VT. USA).

ChAT neuron size in the MS and VDB

The size of cholinergic neurons in MS and VDB regions was estimated from sections stained for choline acetyltransferase using diaminobenzidine (DAB) as the chromogen. All sections used for the stereological assessment were stained and processed together to minimize variability. Stereo Investigator 9.0 optical fractionator and vertical nucleator probes were used for the analysis. The individual performing the analysis was blinded to the experimental conditions. Anatomical boundaries of the MS/VDB were defined rostrally by the meeting of the corpus callosum at the midline, (1.10 mm anterior to bregma) and caudally by the midline crossing of the anterior commissure (0.14 mm anterior to bregma)73. MS and the VDB were traced in each section at low magnification using a 4x objective. Cell size measurements were collected using the following parameters: counting frame, 80 × 80 µm; guard zone, 5 µm; and counting depth, 20 µm. ChAT positive cell size was measured with a 100x objective, using criteria that fulfilled the unbiased counting rules. The vertical nucleator probe was used to estimate the area of the largest cross-sectional profile of each cholinergic neuron that fulfilled the 3D counting rules of the optical fractionator probe. At the largest cross-sectional profile of the cell, a set of four rays were generated forming two lines that crossed at a point within the cell and radiated with random orientations towards the edge of the profile. The four intersections with the cell boundary were marked. The area of the profiles (A) was estimated according to the equation a=πl2 where l is the average length of the intercepts.

Cholinergic neuron population estimate

The total number of cholinergic neurons (N) was estimated in the same DAB stained sections as above with the optical fractionator probe (Stereo Investigator, MBF Bioscience)74 based on the formula: N = ∑Q th 1as 1ss where N = total number of neurons, ∑Q = number of neurons actually counted in the specimens, t = section thickness calculated by the software at each sampling site, h = counting frame height (h = 30), ss∫ = section sampling fraction (ss = 1/6), and as = area sampling fraction (counting frame/sampling grid = 35um × 35um/80um × 80um). Although not the primary objective of the studies, the counts were used to indicate if cells were lost from the sample population under the various experimental conditions. The use of the optical fractionator probe provided an unbiased estimate of cell numbers independent of sample shrinkage. The area of the counting frame was 1225 µm2 in a total sampling grid area of 6400 µm2. The average thickness of the counting area was 30 µm. On average, 194.5 sampling sites were counted from 4 sections with 46.6 total markers for each region and a Gundersen coefficient of error ranging from 0.098 to 0.233 (mean = 0.1568).

Neurological analysis of ChAT neurite length in the MS and fiber density in the hippocampus and parietal cortex

Sections were visualized and tiled, Z-stack fluorescent images were captured with an LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc) from coronal sections through the MS; dorsal hippocampus including alveus, stratum oriens, stratum pyramidale (CA1), stratum radiatum and stratum lacunosum/moleculare; and M1 region parietal cortex, spanning layers 1 through 6. MBF Autoneuron was used to trace neurites attached to cholinergic somata and their length determined. MBF Autoneuron was also used to trace fiber length per tissue volume for hippocampal and cortical regions. Volumes analyzed for ChAT fiber density were defined using consistent hippocampal and cortical regions-of-interest, spanning the imaged area projected through 30 1-micron optical sections, giving normalized densities across the samples.

MAP2 immunoreactivity analysis

Cross sectional tiled reconstructions of hippocampi stained for MAP2 were analyzed using Fiji/ImageJ. Grayscales were inverted, and thresholds set using an automated, user-independent Otsu/Huang thresholding algorithm. Defined rectangular regions of interest (ROIs) were placed over consistent areas of CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus by an operator blind to treatment and age, and the percentage of pixels within the applied ROIs were measured, reflecting the staining density in the region.

Statistics

Values throughout the manuscript are presented as mean ± sem unless otherwise indicated.

Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism software or SigmaStat. Sections were coded to reduce bias and Microbrightfield (MBF) unbiased stereology was used for the collection of cellular data. Temporal data was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc comparisons. Analysis of the primary comparison of LM11A-31 treated mice to vehicle treated mice was done by t test. Additional t tests were run to verify changes in the aged mice relative to young mice or to examine effects in cholinergic subregions. Analyses of multiple regions were done using analysis of variance followed by post hoc comparisons. Specific tests are indicated for each experiment.

Results

The most consistently reported age-related cellular changes involving BFCNs are loss of cell volume and neurite processes10 while reports of a decline in cell number are more variable28,75. In an aging model in which cell number did decrease, p75 knockout had no effect29. In the present study, cell counts in the combined MS/VDB region in a cohort of 4- and 18-month old mice were 5622 ± 1258 and 4479 ± 1077 (mean ± 95% confidence intervals). In a separate cohort of 4- and 25-month old mice, cell counts were 3806 ± 560 and 3038 ± 665. Thus, while there were decreases in cell counts at 18 and 25 months, these did not reach statistical significance. Considering these findings, the present study focused on measures of cell size and neurite processes as primary outcome measures.

Age-related changes in the cross-sectional area of cholinergic cells within the medial septum (MS) and vertical diagonal band (VDB) nuclei were measured in mice using unbiased stereology at ages ranging from 4 to 25 months. The mean size of all cholinergic neurons at the 4-month reference age was 149.2 ± 5.5 µm2. Some regional variation was seen, with neurons of the VDB (162.5 ± 33.8 µm2) measuring 19.5% larger (p < 0.001, n = 34 mice) than neurons in the MS (136.0 ± 23.9 µm2). Significant shrinkage of cholinergic cells was first seen at 18 months (25.0 ± 1.8% loss) which progressed to 34.2 ± 2.0% by 25 months (Fig. 1A). No regional differences were seen in the timing or magnitude of the age-related decrease in cholinergic cell size. A small but progressive decrease in brain weight was seen with aging though this did not reach significance until 18 months, showing a 13.3 ± 1.0% decrease with a 14.6 ± 1.5% decrease by 25 months (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Age-related decreases in cholinergic neuron size and total brain weight. (A) Neuron areas in the medial septum (MS) and vertical diagonal band (VDB) at the indicated ages as a proportion of that in 4-month-old mice (bars, mean ± standard error of the mean (sem) of 6–12 mice). Decreases in size relative to young mice were significant at 18 and 25 months (p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test relative to 4-month-old mice at p < 0.05). (B) Brain weights at the indicated ages showed a gradual progressive decrease over time with significant decreases relative to young mice at 18 and 25 months. *(p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test relative to 4-month-old mice at p < 0.05). Values are expressed as mean + sem.

Effects of LM11A-31 on age-related changes in cholinergic cell morphology were first examined in a prevention paradigm, with daily treatment at 5, 20 or 50 mg/kg for three months beginning at 15 months and extending to 18 months, an age when significant changes would normally be seen. Cholinergic cell area in the MS + VDB (Fig. 2A), MS (Fig. 2B) and VDB (Fig. 2C) of LM11A-31 treated mice showed a dose-dependent increase in cholinergic cell area with maximal effects at 50 mg/kg, producing areas equivalent to those of 4-month old mice. The estimated EC50 from the composite data of these studies was 7.51 mg/kg for the MS, 15.57 mg/kg for the VDB and 11.77 mg/kg for the combined MS and VDB. Body weight was stable throughout the treatment (Fig. 2D) and there was no drug effect on brain weight (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Drug dose-effect responses and systemic effects. (AC) Area of ChAT immunoreactive cells in animals given LM11A-31 once daily for three months from age 15 to 18 months, at the indicated doses (n = 7–9 each). Values in a matched young cohort (age 4 months, n = 8) are indicated by the dashed line. Treatment inhibited the age-associated decrease in cholinergic neuron area in total (MS + VDB) and similarly in the MS and VDB individually. Composite data for all cholinergic cells (MS + VDB) yielded an EC50 of 11.77 mg/kg. (D) Mean body weights in each group as a proportion of pretreatment weights (31.4–33.0 g) did not change significantly over the course of the experiment. (E) Three-month treatment with LM11A-31 at 5–50 mg/kg had no effect on brain weights at 18 months. Values are expressed as mean + sem.

A separate group of mice were treated with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 for 5 weeks beginning at 17 months of age. Vehicle treated mice at 18 months showed a similar overall decrease in cholinergic MS/VDB cell area of 26.6% (MS + VDB) relative to young mice (4 Months) and no regional differences in the loss of cell area were seen within the MS (−26.1%) and VDB (−27.1%) (Fig. 3). LM11A-31 significantly reduced the overall loss of cholinergic cell area from −26.6 + 3.8% to −10.1 + 5.5% (MS + VDB) and though similar changes were seen in individual regions, these fell short of significance. A population analysis of the cholinergic cells (not shown) indicated that there was a small but significant shift toward larger cell area measurements in response to LM11A-31 in both the MS and VDB (X2, p’s < 0.001).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Diminished efficacy with shorter and later treatment. Five weeks of treatment once daily with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 (n = 5) beginning at 17 months of age partially prevented and/or reversed the decrease in cholinergic neuron area in the MS and VDB seen in the vehicle treated mice (n = 4). Cholinergic neurons were identified by ChAT immunoreactivity and an unbiased estimate of area was obtained using Microbrightfield (MBF) software. A significant decrease in cell area measurements was seen in all groups (t-test, (n = 8) vs 18 months (n = 4), p values = 0.018–0.001). Inhibition and/or reversal of loss of cell size after five weeks of treatment was partial and reached significance only in the composite data for MS + VDB (t-test, treated vs vehicle, p = 0.032). Values are expressed as mean + sem.

To examine the effects of LM11A-31 on established, advanced-stage cholinergic atrophy, mice were treated for four months with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 beginning at 21 months of age. Within dendritic fields, overall ChAT staining appeared diminished in 25-month-old relative to young mice (Fig. 4A,B) and this loss of immunoreactivity appeared to be principally due to a decreased density of processes and shrinkage of neurons, rather than loss of neurons. LM11A-31 treatment partially restored cholinergic staining (Fig. 4C). In the aged mice, some neurons were shrunken in appearance, displayed truncated neurites (arrowhead), prominent varicosities (arrows) and an overall loss of neurite density relative to young mice (Fig. 4D,E). Following treatment with LM11A-31, neurons appeared less shrunken, the processes were less damaged and fewer varicosities were seen (Fig. 4F). At 25 months of age, the mean area of all cholinergic cells (MS + VDB) was decreased by 34.0 ± 3.0% (Fig. 5C) with roughly equal contributions from the MS (−37.5 ± 2.6%) (Fig. 5A) and VDB (−31.0 ± 2.6%) (Fig. 5B). The mean cell area was significantly restored to within 12.6 ± 4.8% of the size present in the four-month-old mice, with no significant regional differences. To further examine the degree of recovery, mean cholinergic cell area in mice receiving LM11A-31 from 21 to 25 months was compared to cell areas in untreated 18-month old mice, corresponding to the age of treatment initiation. Overall, the cholinergic cell size within the MS and VDB of 25-month old mice treated with LM11A-31 was significantly greater than the area in untreated 18-month-old mice (Fig. 5A). Similar patterns were observed in the MS (Fig. 5B), with borderline significance in the VDB (Fig. 5C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

LM11A-31 efficacy at older ages. Representative choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) immunostaining of neurons in the medial septum (MS) and vertical limb of the diagonal band (VDB) of young, 4-month-old mice (A), and 25-month-old mice treated once daily with vehicle (B) or 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 (C) for four months from 21–25 months. Decreased cell size is apparent in 25-month-old animals, which is partially restored after treatment with LM11A-31. At higher magnification, neurons in the aged mice (E) have a shrunken appearance with a decrease in the size and extent of the neuritic network relative to young mice (D). Aged mice treated with LM11A-31 for 4 months (F) show partial restoration of cell size and neurites.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Restoration of established neuronal atrophy. Quantification of cholinergic neuron cell areas in the MS and VDB of 25-month-old mice (n = 12) showed significant losses of 37.5% in the MS and 31.0% in the VDB relative to that measured in 4-month-old mice (n = 8). With LM11A-31 administration for 4 months beginning at month 21, the size of cholinergic neurons was significantly greater in both regions reaching 85–90% of the size in young mice (t-test of treated vs vehicle, p’s = 0.014–0.001). Cholinergic neuron size in 25-month-old mice treated with LM11A-31 was also significantly greater than that in 18-month-old vehicle treated mice suggesting a reversal of atrophy relative to the age at which treatment was initiated (t-test of treated 25-month-old mice vs 18-month-old untreated mice). Values are expressed as mean + sem.

In addition to cell shrinkage, aging was associated with loss of neuronal processes. To evaluate the extent of neurite loss and the effect of LM11A-31, the length of individual neurites in 25-month old mice treated with vehicle or LM11A-31 were compared to young 4-month-old mice and to each other (Fig. 6). In 25-month-old mice, the mean neurite length was reduced to 71.6 ± 3.2 µm relative to 126.8 ± 14.5 µm in the young mice, a 43.5% decrease. The mean length of neurites in the 25-month old mice treated with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 was 87.3 ± 3.8 µm, reflecting a 22.0% improvement over the vehicle-treated, aged mice.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Treatment effects on neurite lengths. Quantification of neurite length within the basal forebrain (as in Fig. 4) showed a significant decrease in 25-month-old mice (n = 6) relative to 4-month-old mice (n = 6), from a mean of 126.8 ± 14.5 µm to 71.6 ± 3.2 µm (t test, 4 vs 25 months). In 25-month-old mice treated with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 from 21 to 25 months, mean length (87.3 ± 3.8 µm) was significantly greater than the vehicle treated 25-month-old mice (p = 0.0131, t test, treated vs vehicle) and was 72% of the length seen in young mice. Bars, mean + sem.

To determine whether treatment with LM11A-31 influenced MS/VDB cell number, estimates of cell numbers were compared between vehicle and LM11A-31 after 3 months of treatment (50 mg/kg) in 18-month-old mice and after 4 months of treatment in 25-month-old mice. At 18 months, cell counts were 4479 ± 1077 and 3832 ± 618; and at 25 months were 3038 ± 665 and 3735 ± 841. Therefore, it appeared that LM11A-31 had no detectable effect on MS/VDB cell number.

To evaluate the consequences of BFCN atrophy and neurite loss on distal targets which might correlate with age-related cognitive decline, cholinergic fiber density was examined in areas of the hippocampus and parietal cortex innervated by the MS and VDB in aged mice treated with vehicle versus 50 mg/kg LM11A-31. The hippocampus is considered to be a primary target of cholinergic innervation from the MS/VDB and the innervation of the CA1 region has been well characterized76. Young mice exhibit an extensive network of hippocampal cholinergic fibers with the highest densities in the oriens, radiatum and moleculare layers. In the present study, focused on CA1, the most notable loss of fiber density with age appeared in the radiatum and moleculare (Fig. 7A), layers that receive a high density of cholinergic input from the MS and VDB. Across all the layers of CA1 together, cholinergic fiber density showed an age-related decrease of 37.4 ± 8.6%, which was reduced to a 17.3 ± 10.3% with LM11A-31 treatment (Fig. 7D). In the parietal cortex, a significant age-associated decreased in cholinergic fiber density was also found (Fig. 7E) and treatment with LM11A-31 was associated with an increase in density which did not reach significance.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Hippocampal and cortical cholinergic fiber densities in young, aged and LM11A-31 treated/aged mice. (A) Representative image of ChAT-positive fibers in a coronal section of the hippocampus in the CA1 region of a 4-month-old mouse. (B) The greatest decreases in density in the aged mice (25 months) were apparent in the radiatum and lacunosum-moleculare. (C) Treatment with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 from 21–25 months appeared to partially restore neurite density in the hippocampus. (D) Quantitation of neurite density in CA1 from a reconstruction of 30-image stacks with a region-of-interest spanning all layers showed a significant reduction in aged mice (25 months) relative to young mice (4 months) and partial recovery of density after treatment with LM11A-31. (E) Analysis of cholinergic fiber density encompassing layers 1–6 within the parietal cortex demonstrated a significant reduction with age. Treatment with LM11A-31 was associated with an increase in fiber density that did not reach significance. P values, as indicated above bars, are from a two-way ANOVA with factors of age/treatment and staining cohort using Holm-Sidak post-hoc analysis.

Expression of the microtubule associated protein MAP2, a marker for neurites associated with hippocampal pyramidal and other cells, has been reported to be sensitive to axonal injury77 and to be markedly downregulated in aged rodents78,79. Similar marked decreases in MAP2 levels were found in hippocampal CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus regions of 25-month-old mice relative to a 4-month-old cohort (Fig. 8). Treatment with LM11A-31 resulted in partial but significant recovery of MAP-2 levels in the CA1 and CA3 regions.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

MAP-2 expression in young, aged and LM11A-31 treated/aged mice. The MAP-2 was imaged to eliminate background signal and provide a clean MAP-2 signal. The values shown therefore reflect relative MAP-2 intensities but not absolute expression. A significant loss of MAP-2 signal is observed in aged mice, which is partially recovered with LM11A-31 treatment, significantly in the CA1 and CA3 regions. ***P < 0.001 for comparison with young animals, other P values as indicated; N = 6 animals/group; ANOVA with post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls testing.

To determine if the age-related loss of cholinergic fiber density was associated with a loss of presynaptic termini, western blot analysis for the pre-synaptic marker synaptophysin was performed on hippocampus, cortex, striatum and basal forebrain tissue. Synaptophysin expression in the hippocampus was decreased in 25-month old mice to 49.4 ± 6.8% of that in 4-month-old (young) mice (Fig. 9). Treatment with LM11A-31 for four months beginning at 21 months, partially prevented the loss of synaptophysin to a level of 74.1 ± 3.8% of young mice. A similar effect was seen in the cortex (53.0 ± 5.8% of control; to 78.0 ± 4.5% with LM11A-31). A less robust loss of synaptophysin was seen in the striatum in the aged mice (76.1 ± 7.7% of young mice) which increased with LM11A-31 (91.3 ± 7.2% of young mice) but failed to reach significance due in part to the smaller initial deficit and greater variation. No significant changes in synaptophysin expression were seen in the ventral forebrain containing the MS and VDB although a similar pattern was noted.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Western blot analysis of synaptophysin levels in the hippocampus of 4-month-old mice and 25-month-old mice treated with 50 mg/kg LM11A-31 or vehicle (saline) from 21 to 25 months. (A) In the hippocampus and cortex, synaptophysin was reduced in aged mice relative to young mice and partially restored by treatment with LM11A-31. The bands shown are representative of the differences seen across nine different blots and were acquired from the gel scans in Supplemental Fig. S1. Beta actin bands were generated from the same blot after stripping and re-probing. (B) Synaptophysin signal normalized to beta-actin showed significant age-related reduction in hippocampus, cortex and striatum with a significant recovery of signal associated with LM11A-31 treatment in the hippocampus and cortex (p’s = 0.005–0.014, t test, treated vs vehicle, n = 9). Values are mean + sem. a, P < 0.001 relative to young mice.

Discussion

The present study demonstrates an age-associated decrease in BFCN area and loss of neurite length with no significant changes detected in BFCN number. It is important to acknowledge that some but not all prior rodent studies have identified such age-associated markers of degeneration. This variation in findings across studies might involve differences in animal strains and housing, measurement techniques and time points evaluated10.

Several lines of evidence have suggested that p75NTR related mechanisms contribute to age-associated BFCN degeneration. Al-Shawi et al.38 found that application of proNGF to brain slices derived from young (3–6 mo) mouse brain had no effect on BFCNs, but when applied to slices from aged (22–30 mo) mice caused substantial neuronal death. These investigators also found increased levels of proNGF in hippocampal but not cortical tissue harvested from both aged mice (22–20 mo) and aged rats (22–30 mo). Within mouse basal forebrain, no age-related increase in p75NTR levels was detected. In contrast, in another study35, an increase in basal forebrain p75NTR levels was detected in aged rat brain. In this same study, a single injection of proNGF into the hippocampus of aged rats led to BFCN cell body atrophy along with a decrease in the density of neurites in the region. In studies of human hippocampus and adjacent cortex, p75NTR immunostaining was found to increase into the fourth decade80. Other studies have found that levels of basal forebrain TrkA are reduced with aging with a concomitant increase in the ratio of p75NTR to TrkA expression within BFCNs, which may be a particularly potent driver of neural degeneration8184. Cholinergic degeneration, in particular, is likely to be highly vulnerable to the combination of age-related increased p75NTR, decreased TrkA and increased levels of proNGF34,81. In rats, age-related deficits in spatial learning and recognition memory have been associated with increased levels of proNGF and p75NTR in the frontal cortex and hippocampus39. Decreases in mature NGF gave rise to approximately a 4-fold increase in the proNGF:NGF ratio in aged rats. In addition, reductions in dendrite complexity and spine density have been seen in hippocampal neurons overexpressing p75NTR85. The present studies, showing that an agent which modulates p75NTR activity slows, and may reverse, effects of aging on basal forebrain neurons, further support the view that p75NTR and its ligands may play an important role in aging-related pathology and dysfunction of that brain region.

LM11A-31 effects on age-related degeneration could occur through several non-mutually exclusive mechanisms. These include modulation of p75NTR signaling to upregulate trophic mechanisms such as recruitment of the IRAK adaptor and promotion of AKT signaling64 and to downregulate degenerative mechanisms including JNK and excessive RhoA activation64,67,68. Characterization of LM11A-31 has shown it to prevent death of cultured neurons through p75NTR-dependent mechanisms in the absence of pro- and mature NTs. In addition, LM11A-31 has been shown to inhibit the ability of proNGF to induce cell death when added to oligodendrocyte cultures64, to inhibit proNGF binding to p75NTR in an in vivo model of spinal cord injury in which proNGF levels are raised69, and to inhibit proNGF/p75NTR-induced bladder dysfunction also following spinal cord injury86. Thus, through these two mechanisms, LM11A-31 might reset the balance of neurotrophin signaling in aging by offsetting the effects of an increased p75NTR/TrkA ratio in association with increases in proNGF levels. This could be expected to have potent protective effects through suppressing early processes associated with age-related neurodegeneration. Moreover, even if p75NTR-mediated mechanisms are not a primary driver of degeneration, LM11A-31 may be effective through activation of signaling that favors survival and preservation of structural integrity in cells expressing the receptor.

The effects of LM11A-31 on preventing or reversing age-associated degeneration of BFCNs and their projections likely involves a direct effect through their p75NTR receptors. However, LM11A-31 effects on degenerative changes in cells intrinsic to the hippocampus such as pyramidal neurons have been found in a model of Huntington’s disease72. Thus, reversing age-related degeneration could be either a direct effect through p75NTR expressed by pyramidal neurons87 or through an indirect result of enhanced cholinergic fiber input. The finding that LM11A-31 treatment stimulates a recovery of the synaptophysin presynaptic marker is consistent with the latter mechanism although the two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive.

While aging is generally considered to be the most powerful risk factor for the onset of AD, the extent to which age-related mechanisms promote or are additive to AD, versus the less likely alternative that AD mechanisms simply require long durations, remains to be further defined. The finding that BFCNs in older versus younger rats are significantly more vulnerable to intraventricular injections of amyloid beta (Aβ25–35), supports a model for age-related processes contributing to AD mechanisms88. Further supporting this notion is the finding that injections of fibrillar Aβ in cortical tissue led to markedly greater loss of cortical neurons in older versus younger non-human primates89. The potential role of aging processes in AD cognitive impairment raises the possibility that candidate AD therapies are more likely to be effective if they directly address age-related degeneration along with AD-linked mechanisms, such as those involving amyloid and tau. The present study, combined with our prior studies in AD models, indicates that p75NTR small molecule ligands may constitute a class of therapeutics capable of engaging both categories of degenerative mechanisms to mitigate the effects of aging.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (161.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

Supported by the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (F.M.L.), Alzheimer’s Association (F.M.L.), the Eastern Chapter of the North Carolina Alzheimer’s Association (F.M.L.) and R01 NS083164 (RBM).

Author Contributions

Y.X., R.M., S.M. and F.L. contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study and writing of the manuscript. Y.X., R.M. and S.M. prepared the figures.

Data Availability

The data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing Interests

Drs Longo and Massa are listed as inventors on patents relating to a compound in this report that is assigned to the University of North Carolina, University of California, San Francisco and the Dept. of Veterans Affairs. Drs Massa and Longo are entitled to royalties distributed by UC and the VA per their standard agreements. Dr. Longo is a principal of, and has financial interest in PharmatrophiX, a company focused on the development of small molecule ligands for neurotrophin receptors that has licensed several of these patents.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-41654-8.

References

  • 1.Aznavour N, Mechawar N, Descarries L. Comparative analysis of cholinergic innervation in the dorsal hippocampus of adult mouse and rat: a quantitative immunocytochemical study. Hippocampus. 2002;12:206–217. doi: 10.1002/hipo.1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mesulam MM. The cholinergic innervation of the human cerebral cortex. Prog Brain Res. 2004;145:67–78. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)45004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gu Z, Yakel JL. Timing-dependent septal cholinergic induction of dynamic hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2011;71:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leung LS, Shen B, Rajakumar N, Ma J. Cholinergic activity enhances hippocampal long-term potentiation in CA1 during walking in rats. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9297–9304. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-28-09297.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duzel S, et al. Basal forebrain integrity and cognitive memory profile in healthy aging. Brain Res. 2010;1308:124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Al-Onaizi MA, et al. Regulation of Cognitive Processing by Hippocampal Cholinergic Tone. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:1615–1628. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartus RT, Dean RL, 3rd, Beer B, Lippa AS. The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science. 1982;217:408–414. doi: 10.1126/science.7046051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gallagher M, Colombo PJ. Ageing: the cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive decline. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:161–168. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80022-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ypsilanti AR, da Cruz G, Burgess MT, Aubert A. I. The length of hippocampal cholinergic fibers is reduced in the aging brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29:1666–1679. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schliebs R, Arendt T. The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221:555–563. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grothe M, Heinsen H, Teipel S. Longitudinal measures of cholinergic forebrain atrophy in the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1210–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grothe M, Heinsen H, Teipel SJ. Atrophy of the cholinergic Basal forebrain over the adult age range and in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:805–813. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wolf D, et al. Association of basal forebrain volumes and cognition in normal aging. Neuropsychologia. 2014;53:54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pini L, et al. Brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease and aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;30:25–48. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lyness SA, Zarow C, Chui HC. Neuron loss in key cholinergic and aminergic nuclei in Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00057-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Coulson EJ, May LM, Sykes AM, Hamlin AS. The role of the p75 neurotrophin receptor in cholinergic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscientist. 2009;15:317–323. doi: 10.1177/1073858408331376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grothe M, et al. Reduction of basal forebrain cholinergic system parallels cognitive impairment in patients at high risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:1685–1695. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vana L, et al. Progression of tau pathology in cholinergic Basal forebrain neurons in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:2533–2550. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang H, et al. Grey matter atrophy of basal forebrain and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:487–493. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.217133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mesulam MM. Cholinergic circuitry of the human nucleus basalis and its fate in Alzheimer’s disease. J Comp Neurol. 2013;521:4124–4144. doi: 10.1002/cne.23415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tiernan CT, et al. Protein homeostasis gene dysregulation in pretangle-bearing nucleus basalis neurons during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;42:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pepeu G, Grazia Giovannini M. The fate of the brain cholinergic neurons in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res. 2017;1670:173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parhad IM, et al. Axonal atrophy in aging is associated with a decline in neurofilament gene expression. J Neurosci Res. 1995;41:355–366. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490410308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Veng LM, Granholm AC, Rose GM. Age-related sex differences in spatial learning and basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in F344 rats. Physiol Behav. 2003;80:27–36. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Geula C, Nagykery N, Nicholas A, Wu CK. Cholinergic neuronal and axonal abnormalities are present early in aging and in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008;67:309–318. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31816a1df3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ward NL, Stanford LE, Brown RE, Hagg T. Cholinergic medial septum neurons do not degenerate in aged 129/Sv control or p75(NGFR)−/−mice. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:125–134. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dokter M, et al. Implications of p75NTR for dentate gyrus morphology and hippocampus-related behavior revisited. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220:1449–1462. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0737-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Greferath U, Bennie A, Kourakis A, Barrett GL. Impaired spatial learning in aged rats is associated with loss of p75-positive neurons in the basal forebrain. Neuroscience. 2000;100:363–373. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00260-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boskovic Z, et al. The role of p75NTR in cholinergic basal forebrain structure and function. J Neurosci. 2014;34:13033–13038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2364-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Riascos D, et al. Alterations of Ca(2)(+)-responsive proteins within cholinergic neurons in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:1325–1333. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mesulam M, Shaw P, Mash D, Weintraub S. Cholinergic nucleus basalis tauopathy emerges early in the aging-MCI-AD continuum. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:815–828. doi: 10.1002/ana.20100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Burke SN, Barnes CA. Neural plasticity in the ageing brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:30–40. doi: 10.1038/nrn1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Meldolesi J. Neurotrophin receptors in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2017;121:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Costa RO, Perestrelo T, Almeida RD. PROneurotrophins and CONSequences. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55:2934–2951. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0505-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fortress AM, Buhusi M, Helke KL, Granholm AC. Cholinergic Degeneration and Alterations in the TrkA and p75NTR Balance as a Result of Pro-NGF Injection into Aged Rats. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:460543. doi: 10.4061/2011/460543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nykjaer A, et al. Sortilin is essential for proNGF-induced neuronal cell death. Nature. 2004;427:843–848. doi: 10.1038/nature02319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ioannou, M. S. & Fahnestock, M. ProNGF, but Not NGF, Switches from Neurotrophic to Apoptotic Activity in Response to Reductions in TrkA Receptor Levels. Int J Mol Sci18, 10.3390/ijms18030599 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Al-Shawi R, et al. Neurotoxic and neurotrophic roles of proNGF and the receptor sortilin in the adult and ageing nervous system. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:2103–2114. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Terry AV, Jr., Kutiyanawalla A, Pillai A. Age-dependent alterations in nerve growth factor (NGF)-related proteins, sortilin, and learning and memory in rats. Physiol Behav. 2011;102:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yeo TT, et al. Absence of p75NTR causes increased basal forebrain cholinergic neuron size, choline acetyltransferase activity, and target innervation. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7594–7605. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-20-07594.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Greferath U, et al. Enlarged cholinergic forebrain neurons and improved spatial learning in p75 knockout mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:885–893. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00976.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greferath U, Trieu J, Barrett GL. The p75 neurotrophin receptor has nonapoptotic antineurotrophic actions in the basal forebrain. J Neurosci Res. 2012;90:278–287. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Busch R, et al. Effects of p75NTR deficiency on cholinergic innervation of the amygdala and anxiety-like behavior. J Neurochem. 2017;141:461–471. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Von Bohlen Und Halbach V, Von Bohlen Und Halbach O. Deletion of p75NTR enhances the cholinergic innervation pattern of the visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 2016;33:E012. doi: 10.1017/S0952523816000080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barrett GL, Naim T, Trieu J, Huang M. In vivo knockdown of basal forebrain p75 neurotrophin receptor stimulates choline acetyltransferase activity in the mature hippocampus. J Neurosci Res. 2016;94:389–400. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fischer W, et al. Amelioration of cholinergic neuron atrophy and spatial memory impairment in aged rats by nerve growth factor. Nature. 1987;329:65–68. doi: 10.1038/329065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fischer W, Bjorklund A, Chen K, Gage FH. NGF improves spatial memory in aged rodents as a function of age. J Neurosci. 1991;11:1889–1906. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-07-01889.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Markowska AL, Koliatsos VE, Breckler SJ, Price DL, Olton DS. Human nerve growth factor improves spatial memory in aged but not in young rats. J Neurosci. 1994;14:4815–4824. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04815.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen KS, Gage FH. Somatic gene transfer of NGF to the aged brain: behavioral and morphological amelioration. J Neurosci. 1995;15:2819–2825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-02819.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen KS, Masliah E, Mallory M, Gage FH. Synaptic loss in cognitively impaired aged rats is ameliorated by chronic human nerve growth factor infusion. Neuroscience. 1995;68:19–27. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Martinez-Serrano A, Fischer W, Bjorklund A. Reversal of age-dependent cognitive impairments and cholinergic neuron atrophy by NGF-secreting neural progenitors grafted to the basal forebrain. Neuron. 1995;15:473–484. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Martinez-Serrano A, Fischer W, Soderstrom S, Ebendal T, Bjorklund A. Long-term functional recovery from age-induced spatial memory impairments by nerve growth factor gene transfer to the rat basal forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6355–6360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Backman C, et al. Systemic administration of a nerve growth factor conjugate reverses age-related cognitive dysfunction and prevents cholinergic neuron atrophy. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5437–5442. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-17-05437.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Castel-Barthe MN, et al. Direct intracerebral nerve growth factor gene transfer using a recombinant adenovirus: effect on basal forebrain cholinergic neurons during aging. Neurobiol Dis. 1996;3:76–86. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1996.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Martinez-Serrano A, Bjorklund A. Ex vivo nerve growth factor gene transfer to the basal forebrain in presymptomatic middle-aged rats prevents the development of cholinergic neuron atrophy and cognitive impairment during aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:1858–1863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Conner JM, Darracq MA, Roberts J, Tuszynski MH. Nontropic actions of neurotrophins: subcortical nerve growth factor gene delivery reverses age-related degeneration of primate cortical cholinergic innervation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:1941–1946. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Emerich DF, et al. Implants of polymer-encapsulated human NGF-secreting cells in the nonhuman primate: rescue and sprouting of degenerating cholinergic basal forebrain neurons. J Comp Neurol. 1994;349:148–164. doi: 10.1002/cne.903490110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tuszynski MH, Roberts J, Senut MC, U HS, Gage FH. Gene therapy in the adult primate brain: intraparenchymal grafts of cells genetically modified to produce nerve growth factor prevent cholinergic neuronal degeneration. Gene Ther. 1996;3:305–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nagahara AH, et al. Long-term reversal of cholinergic neuronal decline in aged non-human primates by lentiviral NGF gene delivery. Exp Neurol. 2009;215:153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Smith DE, Roberts J, Gage FH, Tuszynski MH. Age-associated neuronal atrophy occurs in the primate brain and is reversible by growth factor gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10893–10898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tuszynski MH. Intraparenchymal NGF infusions rescue degenerating cholinergic neurons. Cell Transplant. 2000;9:629–636. doi: 10.1177/096368970000900508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Longo FM, Vu TK, Mobley WC. The in vitro biological effect of nerve growth factor is inhibited by synthetic peptides. Cell Regul. 1990;1:189–195. doi: 10.1091/mbc.1.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Longo FM, Manthorpe M, Xie YM, Varon S. Synthetic NGF peptide derivatives prevent neuronal death via a p75 receptor-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci Res. 1997;48:1–17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19970401)48:1&#x0003c;1::AID-JNR1&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Massa SM, et al. Small, nonpeptide p75NTR ligands induce survival signaling and inhibit proNGF-induced death. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5288–5300. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3547-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Massa SM, Xie Y, Longo FM. Alzheimer’s therapeutics: neurotrophin small molecule mimetics. J Mol Neurosci. 2002;19:107–111. doi: 10.1007/s12031-002-0019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Longo FM, Massa SM. Small-molecule modulation of neurotrophin receptors: a strategy for the treatment of neurological disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:507–525. doi: 10.1038/nrd4024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yang T, et al. Small molecule, non-peptide p75 ligands inhibit Abeta-induced neurodegeneration and synaptic impairment. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Friesland A, et al. Amelioration of cisplatin-induced experimental peripheral neuropathy by a small molecule targeting p75 NTR. Neurotoxicology. 2014;45:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tep C, et al. Oral administration of a small molecule targeted to block proNGF binding to p75 promotes myelin sparing and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2013;33:397–410. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0399-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Knowles JK, et al. Small molecule p75NTR ligand prevents cognitive deficits and neurite degeneration in an Alzheimer’s mouse model. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:2052–2063. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nguyen TV, et al. Small molecule p75NTR ligands reduce pathological phosphorylation and misfolding of tau, inflammatory changes, cholinergic degeneration, and cognitive deficits in AbetaPP(L/S) transgenic mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42:459–483. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Simmons DA, et al. A small molecule p75NTR ligand, LM11A-31, reverses cholinergic neurite dystrophy in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models with mid- to late-stage disease progression. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K. B. J. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 2nd Edition (Academic Press, 2001).
  • 74.West MJ. New stereological methods for counting neurons. Neurobiol Aging. 1993;14:275–285. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90112-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Altavista MC, Rossi P, Bentivoglio AR, Crociani P, Albanese A. Aging is associated with a diffuse impairment of forebrain cholinergic neurons. Brain Res. 1990;508:51–59. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91116-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Teles-Grilo Ruivo LM, Mellor JR. Cholinergic modulation of hippocampal network function. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2013;5:2. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2013.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Svensson M, Aldskogius H. The effect of axon injury on microtubule-associated protein MAP2 mRNA in the hypoglossal nucleus of the adult rat. Brain Res. 1992;581:319–322. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90725-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Himeda T, Mizuno K, Kato H, Araki T. Effects of age on immunohistochemical changes in the mouse hippocampus. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005;126:673–677. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Di Stefano G, et al. Distribution of map2 in hippocampus and cerebellum of young and old rats by quantitative immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem. 2001;49:1065–1066. doi: 10.1177/002215540104900818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kerwin JM, Morris CM, Johnson M, Perry RH, Perry EK. Hippocampal p75 nerve growth factor receptor immunoreactivity in development, normal aging and senescence. Acta Anat (Basel) 1993;147:216–222. doi: 10.1159/000147507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mufson EJ, et al. Reduction in p140-TrkA receptor protein within the nucleus basalis and cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 1997;146:91–103. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Costantini C, et al. Characterization of the signaling pathway downstream p75 neurotrophin receptor involved in beta-amyloid peptide-dependent cell death. J Mol Neurosci. 2005;25:141–156. doi: 10.1385/JMN:25:2:141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Costantini C, Scrable H, Puglielli L. An aging pathway controls the TrkA to p75NTR receptor switch and amyloid beta-peptide generation. EMBO J. 2006;25:1997–2006. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Williams B, Granholm AC, Sambamurti K. Age-dependent loss of NGF signaling in the rat basal forebrain is due to disrupted MAPK activation. Neurosci Lett. 2007;413:110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zagrebelsky M, et al. The p75 neurotrophin receptor negatively modulates dendrite complexity and spine density in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9989–9999. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2492-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ryu JC, et al. Role of proNGF/p75 signaling in bladder dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:1772–1786. doi: 10.1172/JCI97837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Woo NH, et al. Activation of p75NTR by proBDNF facilitates hippocampal long-term depression. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1069–1077. doi: 10.1038/nn1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nell HJ, Whitehead SN, Cechetto DF. Age-Dependent Effect of beta-Amyloid Toxicity on Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons and Inflammation in the Rat Brain. Brain Pathol. 2015;25:531–542. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Geula C, et al. Aging renders the brain vulnerable to amyloid beta-protein neurotoxicity. Nat Med. 1998;4:827–831. doi: 10.1038/nm0798-827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (161.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES