Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2019 Mar 27;63(4):e02214-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02214-18

In Vivo Efficacy of Novel Monobactam LYS228 in Murine Models of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection

W J Weiss a, M E Pulse a, P Nguyen a, E J Growcott b,*,
PMCID: PMC6437542  PMID: 30642927

LYS228 has potent antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae. LYS228 was efficacious in neutropenic thigh models established with Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-2 or NDM-1; pretreatment with uranyl nitrate considerably shifted calculated static doses of LYS228.

KEYWORDS: LYS228, neutropenic thigh model, pyelonephritis

ABSTRACT

LYS228 has potent antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae. LYS228 was efficacious in neutropenic thigh models established with Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-2 or NDM-1; pretreatment with uranyl nitrate considerably shifted calculated static doses of LYS228. In murine ascending pyelonephritis, LYS228 reduced bacterial burden in kidney, urine, and bladder. The successful treatment of murine infection models established with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae further supports the clinical development of LYS228.

TEXT

Multidrug-resistant bacteria, such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), are a serious health care problem (1). LYS228 is a novel monobactam that has the potential to be developed to treat complicated infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae that are susceptible to the agent (2). The molecule has potent antibacterial activity against β-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae, including those expressing metallo-β-lactamases (e.g., NDM-1), extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) (e.g., CTX-M-15), and serine carbapenemases (e.g., KPC) (3, 4). In this report, we evaluated the efficacy of LYS228 against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in murine models of neutropenic thigh infection and ascending pyelonephritis.

The MICs for LYS228 (synthesized at Novartis), meropenem (meropenem for injection; USP, Hospira, Lake Forest, IL), and levofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were tested using broth microdilution based on the methods outlined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and are recorded in Table 1 (5). K. pneumoniae strains UNT170-1 and UNT-184-1 were part of the University of North Texas (UNT) Health Science Center collection and expressed KPC-2 and NDM-1, respectively. LYS228 MIC50 and MIC90 values have been reported as 0.25 and 1 μg/ml, respectively (4), and the MIC range measured against UNT170-1 is within the LYS228 MIC90, while against UNT184-1, the range is on the elevated end of the LYS228 MIC spectrum (4). Both strains were resistant to meropenem (16 to 32 μg/ml for both strains) and levofloxacin (8 to 16 μg/ml for UNT170-1 and 16 to 32 μg/ml for UNT184-1) as defined by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and CLSI breakpoints for these antibiotics (6, 7).

TABLE 1.

Calculated LYS228 doses required for bacterial stasis or 1 log10 bacterial kill

K. pneumoniae strain Relevant characteristic Uranyl nitrate pretreatment Dose (mg/kg/day)
LYS228 MIC (μg/ml)
Stasis 1 log10 kill
UNT170-1 KPC-2 No 1,180 DNRa 0.5–1
Yes 55 351
UNT184-1 NDM-1 No 192 DNR 8–16
Yes 16 109
a

DNR, did not reach.

Next, the efficacy of LYS228 was determined in vivo, and all studies were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the UNT Health Sciences Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The compound was first tested in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model using female 5- to 6-week-old CD-1 mice (18 to 20 g; Envigo Laboratories). The model was run in a manner similar to one previously described (8). LYS228, dosed subcutaneously every 4 hours (q4h), reduced the thigh bacterial burden of UNT170-1 and UNT184-1 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A and B). The highest dose (1,620 mg/kg/day) of LYS228 significantly reduced bacterial load compared with vehicle controls against both strains tested (UNT170-1, 9.14 ± 0.79 log10 CFU/thigh, P < 0.01 [n = 5/group]; UNT184-1, 8.99 ± 0.29 log10 CFU/thigh, P < 0.001 [n = 5/group]). The dose needed to maintain the bacterial load at the same level as when treatment began (static dose) was calculated; 1,180 or 192 mg/kg/day LYS228 was necessary to achieve bacterial stasis when treating UNT170-1 and UNT184-1, respectively. These data demonstrate that LYS228 can treat CRE in vivo. This may be extremely important clinically given the facts that KPCs have caused many carbapenem-resistant epidemics around the world and that NDM-1 has spread rapidly and had many global outbreaks (9). Additionally, resistance to colistin, one of the last lines of antibiotic defense, is emerging against β-lactamase-expressing strains in Europe (1012), and there is a correlation between β-lactamase production and colistin resistance (13).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Change (Δ) in log10 CFU/thigh of UNT170-1 (A, C) and UNT184-1 (B, D) K. pneumoniae strains present in the thigh after 24 h of treatment with LYS228. (C and D) Bacterial load in the thigh after pretreatment with 5 mg/kg intraperitoneal uranyl nitrate. LYS228 treatment was administered subcutaneously every 4 h. Data are presented as means ± SD; n = 5 animals/group. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test was used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 considered significant. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001, compared to vehicle-treated animals.

LYS228 exhibits high renal clearance in rat and dog (14). To examine the effect of this parameter on LYS228 activity, animals were pretreated with uranyl nitrate (5 mg/kg subcutaneously 3 days before infection), a single administration of which causes necrosis in the proximal tubules and is associated with a decline in renal function (15). This renal impairment has been used to simulate a humanized pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics in mice (1619). Pretreatment with uranyl nitrate enhanced the efficacy of LYS228 in neutropenic thigh models (Fig. 1C and D), as indicated by a considerable shift in calculated static dose, with lower doses of LYS228 required to achieve bacterial stasis (Table 1). Additionally, in combination with uranyl nitrate pretreatment, LYS228 induced a 1-log10 reduction below stasis against both K. pneumoniae strains tested (Table 1). Comparing the bacterial load of vehicle-treated animals (9.83 ± 0.12 log10 and 10.04 ± 0.25 log10 CFU/thigh for UNT170-1 and UNT184-1, respectively) with LYS228-treated animals, there was a significant reduction (Fig. 1C and D). The improved efficacy of LYS228 in mice that received uranyl pretreatment was presumably the result of reduced clearance of LYS228, which in turn helped maintain drug concentrations above those that were microbiologically active. Although plasma concentrations were not measured, uranyl nitrate has been used to slow the clearance of the clinically available monobactam aztreonam (18). In comparison, against UNT170-1, 300 mg/kg/day meropenem was not efficacious, as evidenced by 1.41 ± 0.12 log10 CFU growth over 24 h compared with the bacterial load in the thigh at the time treatment began (7.80 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/thigh). In contrast, the same dose of meropenem reduced UNT184-1 bacterial burden in the thigh to below static levels (7.73 ± 0.22 log10 CFU/thigh) by 1.21 ± 0.65 Δlog10 CFU/thigh, despite a high MIC for meropenem against this isolate. Meropenem is also eliminated renally (20), and, in a similar manner, utilizing a neutropenic thigh model pretreated with uranyl nitrate, a humanized dosing regimen of meropenem has been shown to be effective against a number of VIM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains regardless of MIC (19).

In both sets of thigh studies, LYS228 was more effective against UNT184-1 than against UNT170-1, with the calculated static dose lowered by ∼3- to 6-fold even though the MIC against UNT184-1 was 16-fold higher than that against UNT170-1. Differences in LYS228 in vivo efficacy versus in vitro activity were previously observed (8). Meropenem was also more efficacious against UNT184-1 despite having the same MIC against both strains. A similar observation was made of increased in vivo susceptibility compared with in vitro activity against NDM-1-expressing isolates (21). A reason behind these differences may be reduced expression of activity of the enzyme in vivo due to metal ion availability, thus accounting for greater observed efficacy of certain treatments.

After demonstrating LYS228 efficacy in a neutropenic thigh model of UNT170-1, efficacy was further examined in a murine model of pyelonephritis established with this isolate. The model was run in a similar manner to that already described using female C3H/Hej mice (20 ± 2 g; Jackson Laboratories) (22). Treatment started 4 days after transurethral inoculation and lasted 3 days. Over the course of therapy, bacterial levels in the kidney, urine, and bladder of vehicle-treated animals increased by ∼0.5 to 1 log10 CFU. Treatment with meropenem 150 mg/kg q12h reduced bacterial burden in kidney and urine by 2.32 ± 0.92 and 2.65 ± 0.20 log10 CFU, respectively, compared to that at the start of treatment. The reduction observed in the kidney was similar to the log10 CFU reduction previously reported for meropenem against this strain in this model (1.51 ± 0.55 log10 CFU), although the compound was dosed at 300 mg/kg q2h for 2 days (22). When administered using a q12h dosing regimen, LYS228 dose dependently reduced UNT170-1 CFU present in the kidney, urine, and bladder compared with bacterial levels at the start of treatment (Fig. 2). The highest dose of LYS228 (1,620 mg/kg daily) reduced the bacterial burden to the limit of quantification in all three compartments (log10, 2.35, 2.05, and 2.35), a reduction of 3.85 ± 0.14, 2.92, and 0.74 log10 CFU, respectively.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Log10 CFU of strain UNT170-1 K. pneumoniae present in the kidney (A), bladder (B), and urine (C) after 3 days of treatment with LYS228 beginning on day 4 postinfection (4 dpi). Treatment was administered subcutaneously every 12 h. Bacterial levels were measured at the start of treatment, 4 dpi. Data are presented as means ± SD; n = 5 to 9 animals/group. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test was used for statistical analysis, with P < 0.05 considered significant. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001, compared to vehicle treatment 7 dpi. LOQ, limit of quantification.

Here, we demonstrated the efficacy of LYS228 against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in murine models of thigh infection and ascending pyelonephritis, further supporting the clinical development of LYS228. Indeed, LYS228 is currently in phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by Novartis as part of a drug discovery project.

E.J.G. holds stock in Novartis.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Watkins RR, Bonomo RA. 2016. Overview: global and local impact of antibiotic resistance. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reck F, Bermingham A, Blais J, Capka V, Cariaga T, Casarez A, Colvin R, Dean CR, Fekete A, Gong W, Growcott E, Guo H, Jones AK, Li C, Li F, Lin X, Lindvall M, Lopez S, McKenney D, Metzger L, Moser HE, Prathapam R, Rasper D, Rudewicz P, Sethuraman V, Shen X, Shaul J, Simmons RL, Tashiro K, Tang D, Tjandra M, Turner N, Uehara T, Vitt C, Whitebread S, Yifru A, Zang X, Zhu Q. 2018. Optimization of novel monobactams with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, identification of LYS228. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 28:748–755. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mendes R, Rhomberg PR, Schaefer B, Huband MD, Flamm RK. 2017. In vitro activity of LYS228 against Enterobacteriaceae, including molecularly characterized multidrug-resistant isolates, abstr 293 Abstr Am Soc Microbiol Microbe, New Orleans, LA American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blais J, Lopez S, Li C, Ranjitkar S, Dean CR, Leeds JA, Casarez A, Simmons RL, Reck F. 2018. In vitro activity of LYS228, a novel monobactam antibiotic, against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00552-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00552-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Methods for dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically—11th ed CLSI document M07-A11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 28th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2018. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 8.1. http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/previous_versions_of_documents/.
  • 8.Growcott EJ, Cariaga TA, Morris L, Zang X, Lopez S, Ansaldi DA, Gold J, Gamboa L, Roth T, Simmons RL, Osborne CS. 2019. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel monobactam LYS228 in a neutropenic thigh model of infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:108–116. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bush K. 2018. Past and present perspectives on β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01076-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01076-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jayol A, Poirel L, Dortet L, Nordmann P. 2016. National survey of colistin resistance among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and outbreak caused by colistin-resistant OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, France, 2014. Euro Surveill 21:30339 https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.37.30339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Calia C, Pazzani C, Oliva M, Scrascia M, Lovreglio P, Capolongo C, Dionisi AM, Chiarelli A, Monno R. 2017. Carbapenemases-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in hospitals of two regions of Southern Italy. APMIS 125:491–498. doi: 10.1111/apm.12666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Caspar Y, Maillet M, Pavese P, Francony G, Brion JP, Mallaret MR, Bonnet R, Robin F, Beyrouthy R, Maurin M. 2017. mcr-1 colistin resistance in ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, France. Emerg Infect Dis 23:874–876. doi: 10.3201/eid2305.161942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bradford PA, Kazmierczak KM, Biedenbach DJ, Wise MG, Hackel M, Sahm DF. 2016. Correlation of β-lactamase production and colistin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolates from a global surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1385–1392. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01870-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Casarez A, Li F, Rudewicz P, Tang D, Zang X, Capka V, Reck F. 2017. Chemical stability and pharmacokinetics in rodents and dog for the novel monobactam LYS228, abstr 295. Abstr Am Soc Microbiol Microbe, New Orleans, LA American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Giacomini KM, Roberts SM, Levy G. 1981. Evaluating methods for producing renal dysfunction in rats. J Pharm Sci 70:117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Craig WA, Redington J, Ebert SC. 1991. Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 27:29–40. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_C.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andes D, Craig WA. 1998. In vivo activities of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae: Application to breakpoint determinations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2375–2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. 2013. Human stimulated studies of aztreonam and aztreonam-avibactam to evaluate activity against challenging Gram-negative organisms, including metallo-β-lactamase producers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3299–3306. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01989-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghazi IM, Crandon JL, Lesho EP, McGann P, Nicolau DP. 2015. Efficacy of humanized high-dose meropenem, cefepime, and levofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae isolates producing Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) in a murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7145–7147. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00794-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mouton JW, van den Anker JN. 1995. Meropenem clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 28:275–286. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199528040-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zmarlicka MT, Nailor MD, Nicolau DP. 2015. Impact of the New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase on beta-lactam antibiotics. Infect Drug Resist 8:297–309. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S39186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Weiss WJ, Pulse ME, Nguyen P, Peterson K, Silva J, Simecka JW, Valtierra D, Sabet M, Griffith DC. 2018. Activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a murine model of pyelonephritis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01439-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01439-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES