Skip to main content
Biomedical Reports logoLink to Biomedical Reports
. 2019 Feb 15;10(4):231–237. doi: 10.3892/br.2019.1194

Genital tract infection and associated factors affect the reproductive outcome in fertile females and females undergoing in vitro fertilization

Dimitra Moragianni 1,*, George Dryllis 2,*, Panagiotis Andromidas 3, Rachil Kapeta-Korkouli 1, Evangelia Kouskouni 1, Ilias Pessach 4, Petros Papalexis 5, Antigoni Kodonaki 5, Nikolaos Athanasiou 6, Avraham Pouliakis 7, Stavroula Baka 1,
PMCID: PMC6439431  PMID: 30972218

Abstract

Assisted reproductive techniques including in vitro fertilization (IVF) are being used increasingly worldwide and screening for genital tract infections (GTIs) is recommended prior to treatment as their presence may affect the success rate of IVF. The current study aimed to assess the possible associations between GTI-associated factors and reproductive outcome in a group of reproductive age fertile females and infertile females receiving IVF. A total of 111 infertile women enrolled in an IVF programme (Group A) and 104 fertile women (mothers of at least one child; Group B) underwent microbiological screening of vaginal and cervical samples. All samples were cultured using different protocols for aerobic pathogens, bacterial vaginosis (BV), Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Chlamydia trachomatis and human papilloma virus (HPV). Although each group were comparable in age, more infertile women were >30 years (P=0.0064), had a higher education level (P=0.0001) and were smokers (P=0.007). Only BV (P=0.0013) was more prevalent in Group A. Of the 111 infertile females who were scheduled for IVF, 32 females had a successful pregnancy (Group C) and 79 females exhibited IVF failure (Group D). Tubal factor (P=0.012), estradiol-2 (E2) levels <2,500 pg/ml (P=0.0009) and Mycoplasma infection (P=0.003) were identified to be the strongest predictors of IVF failure. The current study determined certain GTI-associated factors that may contribute to infertility in Greek females of reproductive age as well as other risk factors associated with failure in patients undergoing IVF. Further studies are required to confirm this conclusion.

Keywords: infertility, in vitro fertilization, genital tract infections

Introduction

Genital tract infections (GTIs) frequently occur in females of reproductive age and are strongly associated with increased morbidity, including diseases such as urethritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, amniotic fluid infection and preterm deliveries in pregnancy (1,2). Pelvic inflammatory disease involves the infection and inflammation of the upper genital tract (endometrium, fallopian tubes, ovaries and pelvic peritoneum), which may result in infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic pain (3,4). The vaginal microflora is a dynamic ecosystem normally inhabited by lactobacilli. These bacteria support healthy vaginal conditions by maintaining an acidic environment that is inhospitable to other pathogenic microorganisms. Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus jensenii and Lactobacillus iners are considered to be the four major vaginal Lactobacillus species (5). Many important aspects of women's sexual and reproductive health rely on the protective role of lactobacilli in the vaginal environment. The composition of the vaginal microflora is not static but changes over time in response to various endogenous and exogenous influences. The most common alteration in vaginal microflora is a condition named bacterial vaginosis (BV) (6). According to the United States Public Health Service, the incidence of BV is ~30% in females of reproductive age (7). Additionally, the reported incidences of Candida, Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections, which are associated with infertility, have increased (8,9). The most common urogenital tract infections associated with infertility are aerobic pathogens, BV, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Chlamydia trachomatis and human papilloma virus (HPV) (1-4,7-9). The impact of certain bacteria on fertility, including Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Ureaplasma urealyticum has been well established (8-10). Furthermore, Chlamydia trachomatis infection may cause pelvic inflammatory disease, resulting in chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy and infertility (10).

Infertility affects ~15% of couples worldwide (11). Human infertility is defined as the inability for a couple to conceive and produce offspring following at least 12 consecutive months of unprotected sexual intercourse (11). Infertility is a complex condition as it may alter the quality of life in couples. In 2010, ~1.9 and ~10.5% of women at reproductive age (20-44 years old) were affected by primary and secondary infertility respectively (11). According to the World Health Organization, the term 'primary infertility' is applied when a woman has not conceived (12). 'Secondary infertility' is the incapability to conceive in a couple who have had at least one previously successful conception (12). There are several causes for this condition, among which urogenital infections serve an important role (13).

In vitro fertilization (IVF) has been utilized worldwide to reduce the rate of infertility. It provides a novel means of preliminary genetic diagnosis and maintenance of fertility, making IVF is the most effective treatment option for couples with multifactorial infertility problems (11,13). Fertility rate, defined as the total number of infants born by a single female in her lifetime, has been estimated to be <1 in 2011 in Greece alone, which is less than the estimated normal rate of >2.1(14). It has also been observed that ~10-15% of Greek couples experience infertility issues (14). Furthermore, previous studies have indicated that a history of GTI may be associated with IVF failure (11-18), although supporting data remains sparse.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate potential GTI-associated predictors of infertility in Greek females and to assess the factors associated with successful or unsuccessful IVF technique in infertile patients.

Materials and methods

Patients

The current study was prospectively designed and performed at the Department of Microbiology, Aretaieion General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, from January 2012 to December 2017. A total of 125 Greek females of reproductive age (range, 22-45 years; median age, 32), undergoing vaginal/cervical fluid examination as prenatal screening were recruited into the present study. Patients were classified into two groups: 111 infertile females enrolled into an IVF program (group A) and 104 fertile females (having at least one child; Group B; considered to be the control). Epidemiologic data, symptoms and GTIs were compared between groups.

Induction of ovulation and fertilization

In all patients receiving IVF, a long ovulation induction protocol was applied, which included the daily nasal administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone (2 mg/ml; Synarela®; Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA) on the 21st day of the pre-treatment cycle, which included the administration of combined oral contraceptives (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone; each, Yasmin®; Bayer Hellas AG, Athens, Greece) administered for 2 to 4 weeks. Following the downregulation of estradiol-2 by the aforementioned drugs (E2; <50 pg/ml) recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was administered subcutaneously (beta-follitropin; Puregon®; Organon International BV, OSS, The Netherlands) in a daily dose of 75-300 IU (depending on the patient's characteristics). When ≥3 follicles of 18 mm in diameter were detected via a trans-vaginal ultrasound, 10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was administered subcutaneously (Pregnyl®; Organon International BV) and oocyte pick-up was performed transvaginally via a thin needle 35-36 h later, under ultrasonography. Following oocyte removal, blood-free follicular fluid samples were centrifuged at 600 x g for 10 min, at 25˚C and supernatants were stored at -80˚C. The in vitro fertilization of oocytes was accomplished using the spermatozoa of the patient's respective husband and all embryo transfers were performed on day 3 with a Wallace catheter under ultrasound guidance.

Patient characteristics

Patients in group A were assessed for IVF success and for potential predictors of failure. Patients that successfully became pregnant (Group C; 32 patients) were compared with patients unable to achieve pregnancy (Group D; 79 patients) in regards to the type of pathogen isolated In patients scheduled for IVF, basic characteristics including E2 levels, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of oocytes fertilized and the number of transferred embryos were recorded. Serum E2 levels (centrifuged at 600 x g for 10 min at 25˚C) were measured using the Abbott Architect i-1000SR auto-analyzer (Abbott Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA; sensitivity, 10 pg/ml; intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variability, 5.5 and 6.7%, respectively). Additionally, factors contributing to infertility including endometriosis, male factor (male infertility) or tubal factor (anatomical disorders) were reported.

Vaginal discharge examination

In all patients, specimens of vaginal discharge were obtained from the posterior fornix for microscopy, amine testing, and gram staining at 25˚C for 5 min. Solution A (90% Crystal violet; 20 ml of 95% Ethanol) and Solution B (0.8 g Ammonium oxalate with 80 ml Distilled water) were mixed to obtain a crystal violet staining reagent. Samples were stored for 24 h at 25˚C and filtered through paper prior to use. At the completion of the Gram Stain, gram-negative bacteria stained pink/red and gram-positive bacteria stained blue/purple. Patients from which vaginal samples were not collected were excluded from the current study. Amine testing (‘whiff’ test) was performed by adding a drop of potassium hydroxide 10% to vaginal discharge samples. The test was considered positive if the typical fishy odor was produced. A gram-stained smear was examined via light microscopy (magnification, x1,000) and the presence of yeast and leukocytes was also determined. Specimens for yeast culture, were incubated at 37˚C for 24-48 h and placed in modified Stuart's medium and plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (both from BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Vaginal samples were cultured for aerobic pathogens at 37˚C for 24-48 h and the automated system VITEK2 (BioMerieux) was used to identify the pathogens present.

BV diagnosis

BV was diagnosed via the Nugent scoring system (19). This method assesses the quantity of three different bacterial morphotypes: Large gram-positive rods (representing lactobacilli), small gram-variable rods (representing Gardnerella and Bacteroides/Prevotella species) and curved rods (representing the Mobiluncus species). On the basis of these results, samples were assigned a score from 0 to 10, with 1-3 being considered as normal, 4-6 being considered as intermediate bacterial count (where patients receive chemoprophylaxis treatment) and 7-10 being considered as BV. BV diagnosis was further verified using the Amsel criteria (20), which includes the presence of at least three of the following four findings: homogeneous vaginal discharge, vaginal pH >4.5, ‘fishy’ odour on addition of potassium hydroxide to vaginal fluid (positive ‘whiff test’) and the presence of clue cells in microscopy of wet preparation (20). When each test (Nugent scoring system with Amsel criteria) was positive for either the presence of fungus, trichomonas vaginalis or bacterial vaginosis, the diagnosis of BV was confirmed.

Aerobic vaginitis (AV) diagnosis

The presence of AV was determined using an ‘AV’ score (21). The score was calculated using high-power field light microscopy (magnification, x1,000) to assess the presence or absence of healthy lactobacilli, the number of leukocytes, the number of leukocytes with toxic granulation, the type of vaginal flora and the number of parabasal epithelial cells. An ‘AV’ score of <3 corresponds to no signs of AV, 3-4 to light AV, 5-6 to moderate AV and >6 to severe AV. Candidiasis was diagnosed in symptomatic patients when yeast culture in modified Stuart's medium and plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar was positive for any Candida species and no other pathogen was detected.

Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis detection

Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis were detected using the Mycoplasma IST2 kit (BioMerieux). The kit contained strips that provide information on the presence or absence of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis, and also provides additional information on susceptibility to different antibiotics. Samples were vortexed rapidly at 3,500 rpm at 25˚C for 1 min and they were used (in their liquid form) to rehydrate the lyophilized growth medium provided in the kit. The Mycoplasma strips were then inoculated with 100 µl of the rehydrated growth medium overlaid with two drops of oil, then incubated at 37˚C and observed for colour changes. The results were interpreted following 24 and 48 h of incubation at 37˚C according to the manufacturer's protocol. Samples with titres ≥104 CCU/ml were considered positive. Finally, Chlamydia trachomatis was detected using the COBAS AMPLICOR test kit (cat. no. 04341341 190; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA).

Human papilloma virus (HPV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Toxoplasma, Rubella, HIV, Hepatitis B virus and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) detection

HPV was detected using the LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test (Roche Diagnostics). This method detects 21 HPV genotypes of high risk (including 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 73 and 82) and 16 HPV genotypes of low risk (6, 11, 40, 42, 54, 55, 61, 62, 64, 71, 72, 81, 83, 84, IS39 and CP6108) in cervical cells from each group preserved in PreservCyt® solution, (ThinPrep® PreservCyt® Solution; Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Additionally, anti-CMV, anti-Toxoplasma gondii and anti-Rubella IgG and IgM antibodies were measured in serum using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Architect i-1000SR; Abbott Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.). For the diagnosis of HIV-1/HIV-2 infection, the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay, a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay was utilized (Abbott Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.). Additionally, serum Hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-HBV and anti-HCV titers were determined via an enzyme immunoassay using the ARCHITECT platform (Abbott Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Statistical analysis

The incidence of demographics and symptoms were reported in all study groups (group A vs. group B) and subgroups of women receiving IVF (group C vs. group D). The type and number of symptoms as well as the type and number of pathogens were compared among all groups. To compare nominal data between two groups, the Chi-Square or Fisher test were utilized, while for all data expressed in numeric format, a Student's t-test was used. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All P-values were calculated based on absolute values. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine potential predictors of fertility or IVF success. Furthermore to exclude any confounding factors and calculate the relative risk (RR) for the two groups, multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS v.24 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Ethical approval

Finally, the protocol for this research project was approved by a suitably constituted Ethics Committee of Aretaieion Hospital within which the work was undertaken and it conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Tokyo 2004).

Results

Study group characteristics

A total of 215 females undergoing prenatal cervical/vaginal fluid testing in Aretaieion hospital (within a period of 5 years) were included in the current study. These comprised 111 infertile females (Group A) scheduled for IVF and 104 fertile females (Group B). The mean age of patients did not differ significantly between the two groups, although a greater number of females from Group A were >30 years of age compared with Group B (P=0.0064). Additionally, fertile females had a mean number of 1.23 children. Group A had a higher education level compared with Group B (P=0.0001), as well as a higher smoking prevalence (P=0.007). However, no significant differences in symptoms were observed between groups. In Group A, only BV (P=0.0013) was significantly more prevalent. Furthermore, infertile females possessed >2 pathogens more frequently when compared with fertile females (P=0.006; Table I).

Table I.

Demographics and type of pathogen present in fertile and infertile female patients.

Parameter Overall (n=215) Fertile (n=104) Infertile (n=111) P-value
Age (years) 31.17 30.32 31.98 NS
Age ≤30 years 105 61 44 0.006
Number of children per female 0.56 1.23 0 <0.0001
Higher education 69 11 58 0.0001
Smoking 76 27 49 0.007
Symptomatic of urinary-tract infection 66 29 37 NS
Symptoms
     Irregular discharge 66 29 37 NS
     Dysuria 5 2 3 NS
     Dyspareunia 9 7 2 NS
     Pruritus 32 16 16 NS
     Pain 15 5 10 NS
Type of infection
     Genital mycoplasmas 32 11 21 NS
     Aerobic vaginitis 22 8 14 NS
     Bacterial vaginosis 59 18 41 0.001
      Candida species 13 5 8 NS
     CMV 20 12 8 NS
     HPV 41 22 19 NS
     HCV 0 0 0 NS
     HIV 0 0 0 NS
     HBV 55 23 32 NS
     Toxoplasma 55 26 29 NS
     Rubella 184 88 96 NS
     Chlamydia trachomatis 16 7 9 NS
Decreased Lactobacillus species 179 79 100 0.006
     1 pathogen 34 9 25 0.008
     2 pathogens 1 0 1 NS
     >2 pathogens 35 25 10 0.003

NS, not significant; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HPV, human papilloma virus; HCV, hepatitis C; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; higher education, college education.

Pregnancy outcome

Of the 111 infertile females enrolled in the IVF program, 32 had a successful pregnancy (Group C) and the remaining 79 patients did not (Group D). The mean E2 levels for all patients undergoing IVF was 2234.38±1614.06 pg/ml, with E2 levels being higher in Group C compared with Group D (2853.75±1393.58 vs. 1983.49±1619.40 pg/ml; P=0.007). Furthermore, the number of fertilized oocytes (P=0.002) and the number of resulting embryos (P=0.004) was higher in Group C compared with group D. Male factor was more prevalent in Group C (P=0.0009) while tubal factor was more prevalent in Group D (P=0.028). Other factors, including endometriosis or ovulation disorder, did not significantly differ between the two groups. Of the pathogens examined in the current study, only Mycoplasma was detected more frequently in Group D (P=0.03; Table II).

Table II.

Characteristics and type of infection present in females undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Factor Overall (n=111) Pregnant (n=32) Non-pregnant (n=79) P-value
Estradiol-2 levels (pg/ml) 2234.38±1614.06 2853.75±1393.58 1983.49±1619.4 0.007
Retrieved oocytes (mean) 4.9 6.13 6.3 NS
Fertilized oocytes (mean) 4.26 5.31 4.41 0.002
Embryos (mean) 2.56 2.63 3.84 0.004
Transferred embryos (mean) 2.26 2.63 2.22 0.008
Male factor infertility (n) 17 11 6 NS
Tubal factor infertility (n) 39 6 6 0.0009
Endometriosis (n) 9 2 33 0.028
Ovulation disorder (n) 12 4 7 NS
Unexplained infertility (n) 34 9 8 NS
Vaginal discharge samples
     1 pathogen 1 0 25 NS
     2 pathogens 10 4 1 NS
     >2 pathogens 100 28 6 NS
Mycoplasma species 21 2 72 NS
Aerobic vaginitis 14 4 19 0.03
Bacterial vaginosis 41 10 10 NS
Candida species 8 4 31 NS
CMV 8 3 4 NS
HPV 19 8 5 NS
HCV 0 0 11 NS
HIV 0 0 0 NS
HBV 0 0 0 NS
Toxoplasma 29 10 0 NS
Rubella 96 27 19 NS
Chlamydia trachomatis 9 3 69 NS

NS, not significant; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HPV, human papilloma virus; HCV, hepatitis C; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus.

Multivariate analysis

The results of multivariate analysis revealed that a higher education [relative risk(RR)=2.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.825-2.939; P<0.0001] was the strongest predictor associated with infertility. Other factors associated with infertility were as following: An age of >30 years, smoking, the presence of decreased lactobacillus species, the presence of >2 pathogens and the presence of BV (Table III). Furthermore, tubal factor (RR=1.32; 95% CI, 1.064-1.649; P=0.012), E2 levels <2,500 pg/ml (RR=1.78; 95% CI, 1.265-2.501; P=0.0009) and Mycoplasma infection (RR=1.36; 95% CI, 1.110-1.660; P=0.003) were determined to be the strongest predictors for IVF failure (Table III).

Table III.

Multiregression analysis for potential risk factors associated with infertility or in vitro fertilization failure.

Risk factors Relative risk (95% CI) P-value
Infertility
     Age >30 years 1.45 (1.109-1.905) 0.007
     Higher education 2.31 (1.825-2.939) <0.0001
     Smoking 1.45 (1.127-1.855) 0.004
     Decreased Lactobacillus species 1.55 (1.201-1.994) 0.0007
     >2 pathogens 1.83 (1.099-2.043) 0.02
Bacterial vaginosis 1.55 (1.215-1.974) 0.0004
     IVF failure    
     Tubal factor 1.32 (1.064-1.649) 0.012
     Estradiol-2 levels <4,000 pg/ml 1.48 (0.868-2.539) NS
     Estradiol-2 levels <3,000 pg/ml 1.49 (1.007-2.213) 0.046
     Estradiol-2 levels <2,500 pg/ml 1.78 (1.265-2.501) 0.0009
     >2 pathogens 1.13 (0.712-1.798) NS
     Genital mycoplasmas 1.36 (1.110-1.660) 0.003

Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were evaluated. The statistical significance level was defined as P<0.05. NS, not significant; higher education, college education; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

The current study determined that infertility was associated with specific epidemiologic factors and certain genital tract pathogens in Greek females of reproductive age. IVF failure in infertile females was also associated with tubal factor infertility and the presence of Mycoplasma species in their genital tract. Furthermore, increased age and a higher level of education were also associated with increased infertility in the current study. This is congruent with the results of previous studies, which have reported lower fertility rates in older females (22,23). This may be due to females going to college or university and pursuing a professional career, thus becoming pregnant at an older age where oocyte number and quality has decreased, which is particularly evident after reaching the mid 30s (24). Despite the fact that higher education is associated with higher age, they were examined independently as predisposing factors of infertility in the logistic regression analysis model of the current study, which may require further investigation. Furthermore, the instance of higher education may be attributed to infertility by mechanisms other than age alone, including (25) i) less interest in having large families so that they may provide better for fewer children; ii) the better health status of educated women and of their children result in the higher survival rate of children and a reduction of the need for more children; iii) educated women are using contraceptives more often.

In the current study, smoking was revealed to decrease fertility. It has been indicated that >30% of females at reproductive age are smokers (26). In an older meta-analysis, Augood et al (27) determined that women who smoked had a significantly higher odds ratio of infertility (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34-1.91), in comparison to non-smokers. In addition, previous studies have indicated that low ovarian reserves, low hormone levels and tubal dysfunction may be possible mechanisms by which smoking affects fertility rate in females (28-30).

Certain factors including BV and the presence of >2 pathogens were associated with low fertility in the present study. A previous study has demonstrated that BV is associated with pelvic inflammatory disease, preterm birth and infertility (31). Particularly in the case of a combined infection, the burden of pathogens could easily cause an imbalance in the cervical/uterine microbiome or dysbiosis predisposing to cervical disease or even infertility, according to a previous study (32). Although the current study did not detect an association between infertility and other pathogens, previous studies have identified a strong association of Mycoplasma and chlamydia co-infection with infertility (33,34). Finally, the current study identified that a decreased concentration of Lactobacillus species (AV score, <3) was associated with low fertility. This concurs with a previous study, where a significantly lower Lactobacilli concentration was identified in patients with BV (35). The protective potential of lactobacilli is based on their ability to regulate normal pH and inhibit the growth of vaginal microorganisms known to cause infection and adverse effects (36). A previous study has indicated that a non-Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota is associated with a significant decrease in endometrial receptivity and pregnancy rates (37).

The current study also identified that tubal factor, low E2 levels and the presence of Mycoplasma were strongly associated with IVF failure. In a previous study by Kawwass et al (38), tubal factor infertility was associated with a higher miscarriage rate, preterm birth and a low birth weight risk compared with male factor infertility. Additionally, low E2 levels on the day of hCG administration have also been associated with adverse IVF outcomes (39). Joo et al (40) reported an E2 concentration-dependant effect on IVF outcomes, concluding that the optimal range of serum E2 levels in women is age-dependent: 3,000-4,000 pg/ml for women <38 years and 2,000-3,000 pg/ml for women ≥38 years. However, a meta-analysis has revealed that only female age, duration of subfertility, basal FSH levels and the number of oocytes are predictors of pregnancy following IVF (41).

Considering the effect of genital tract pathogens on IVF outcomes, co-infection or infection due to genital Mycoplasmas were associated with IVF failure in the current study. Although different viruses have been previously associated with IVF failure (42,43), no such association was identified in the cohort of the present study. This may be due to the increased administration of the HPV vaccination in Greece during the recent years (44). Furthermore, Mycoplasma infections and co-infections have been strongly associated with infertility in the general population, although data specifically on patients undergoing IVF remains limited (45). Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to assess the associations of several pathogens with IVF failure. Most presented evidence in previous literature regarding infertility in such patients is indirect, with Mycoplasma infections causing the production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines (including interleukin-1, 12 and 18, tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ), which may provide a mechanistic connection between inflammatory stimulus and in vivo fertilization or embryonic growth following IVF (46).

In conclusion, the current study identified a positive association between BV and infertility in a large-scale cohort of reproductive-age Greek females as well as a strong association between genital Mycoplasmas and IVF failure. Additionally, other predicting factors were determined to be associated with a negative IVF outcome. These results may result in improved management strategies for such patients to reduce infertility and failure rates in patients undergoing IVF. However, further studies with a larger number of participants and more specific criteria may be required to support the present findings, the outcome of which may improve IVF.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all study participants. The authors would also like to thank Aretaieion hospital, from the University of Athens for providing use of their laboratory.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

DM developed, planned and supervised the project, and wrote the manuscript. GD performed data entry and evaluation and wrote the manuscript. SB developed and supervised the current study and wrote the manuscript. PA, RK, EK, IP, PP, AK and NA collected relevant literature. AP performed the whole statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The current study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens (Greece). All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients prior to enrolment.

Patient consent for publication

All patients participating in the present study were informed in detail and agreed to the publication of associated data (and any accompanying images) as appropriate, fully respecting their anonymity and medical ethics. The patients' consent forms from the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:139–147. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee AC, Quaiyum MA, Mullany LC, Mitra DK, Labrique A, Ahmed P, Uddin J, Rafiqullah I, DasGupta S, Mahmud A, et al. Projahnmo Study Group: Screening and treatment of maternal genitourinary tract infections in early pregnancy to prevent preterm birth in rural Sylhet, Bangladesh: A cluster randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(326) doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0724-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ruggeri M, Cannas S, Cubeddu M, Molicotti P, Piras GL, Dessole S, Zanetti S. Bacterial agents as a cause of infertility in humans. New Microbiol. 39. 2016:206–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chayachinda C, Rekhawasin T. Reproductive outcomes of patients being hospitalised with pelvic inflammatory disease. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37:228–232. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1234439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Akins RA, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, Romero R. The vaginal microbiome: New information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG. 2011;118:533–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02840.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Forsum U, Holst E, Larsson PG, Vasquez A, Jakobsson T, Mattsby-Baltzer I. Bacterial vaginosis - a microbiological and immunological enigma. APMIS. 2005;113:81–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm1130201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krauss-Silva L, Almada-Horta A, Alves MB, Camacho KG, Moreira ME, Braga A. Basic vaginal pH, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis: Prevalence in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, a prospective study in a low socioeconomic and multiethnic South American population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(107) doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ona S, Molina RL, Diouf K. Mycoplasma genitalium: An overlooked sexually transmitted pathogen in women? Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016(4513089) doi: 10.1155/2016/4513089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Debattista J, Gazzard CM, Wood RN, Allan JA, Allan JM, Scarman A, Mortlock M, Timms P, Knox CL. Interaction of microbiology and pathology in women undergoing investigations for infertility. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2004;12:135–145. doi: 10.1080/10647440400020703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.2009 Chlamydia Control in Europe. ECDC: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(e1001356) doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tabong PT, Adongo PB. Infertility and childlessness: A qualitative study of the experiences of infertile couples in Northern Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(72) doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Novy M, Eschenbach D, Witkin SS. Infections as a cause of infertility. Glob Libr Women's Med. 2008 Doi: https://doi.org/10.3843/GLOWM.10328. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lykeridou K, Gourounti K, Sarantaki A, Loutradis D, Vaslamatzis G, Deltsidou A. Occupational social class, coping responses and infertility-related stress of women undergoing infertility treatment. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20:1971–1980. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang JY, Rosenwaks Z. In vitro fertilisation treatment and factors affecting success. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26:777–788. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.2008 Assisted Reproductive Technology: Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed December 10. http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2008/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A. European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE): Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1851–1862. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Mouzon J. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2003. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2209–22.e1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:297–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983;74:14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Donders GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: Aerobic vaginitis. BJOG. 2002;109:34–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pakpour AH, Yekaninejad MS, Zeidi IM, Burri A. Prevalence and risk factors of the female sexual dysfunction in a sample of infertile Iranian women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:1589–1596. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2489-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Romero Ramos R, Romero Gutiérrez G, Abortes Monroy I, Medina Sánchez HG. Risk factors associated to female infertility. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008;76:717–721. (In Spanish) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crawford NM, Steiner AZ. Age-related infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015;42:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jungho Kim. Female Education and its Impact on Fertility. The relationship is more complex than one may think. IZA World of Labor. 2016;228 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.2008 Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Smoking and infertility. Fertil Steril 90 (Suppl 5): S254-S259. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA. Smoking and female infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1532–1539. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharma R, Biedenharn KR, Fedor JM, Agarwal A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: Taking control of your fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11(66) doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sharara FI, Beatse SN, Leonardi MR, Navot D, Scott RT Jr. Cigarette smoking accelerates the development of diminished ovarian reserve as evidenced by the clomiphene citrate challenge test. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:257–262. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56875-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soares SR, Simon C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Cigarette smoking affects uterine receptiveness. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:543–547. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van Oostrum N, De Sutter P, Meys J, Verstraelen H. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1809–1815. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Green KA, Zarek SM, Catherino WH. Gynecologic health and disease in relation to the microbiome of the female reproductive tract. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1351–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miron ND, Socolov D, Mareş M, Anton G, Nastasa V, Moraru RF, Virág K, Anghelache-Lupaşcu I, Deák J. Bacteriological agents which play a role in the development of infertility. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2013;60:41–53. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.60.2013.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Menon S, Timms P, Allan JA, Alexander K, Rombauts L, Horner P, Keltz M, Hocking J, Huston WM. Human and Pathogen Factors Associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-Related Infertility in Women. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:969–985. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00035-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sianou A, Galyfos G, Moragianni D, Baka S. Prevalence of vaginitis in different age groups among females in Greece. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37:790–794. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1308322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Donati L, Di Vico A, Nucci M, Quagliozzi L, Spagnuolo T, Labianca A, Bracaglia M, Ianniello F, Caruso A, Paradisi G. Vaginal microbial flora and outcome of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 281. 2010:589–600. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1318-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F, Valbuena D, Martinez-Blanch JF, Jimenez-Almazán J, Alonso R, Alamá P, Remohí J, Pellicer A, et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:684–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Boulet S, Jamieson DJ. Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1263–1271. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829006d9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wei M, Zhang XM, Gu FL, Lv F, Ji YR, Liu KF, She H, Hu R. The impact of LH, E2, and P level of HCG administration day on outcomes of in vitro fertilization in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42:361–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Joo BS, Park SH, An BM, Kim KS, Moon SE, Moon HS. Serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influence the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization in a concentration-dependent manner. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:442–446. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:577–589. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shi L, Liu S, Zhao W, Zhou H, Ren W, Shi J. Hepatitis B virus infection reduces fertilization ability during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Med Virol. 2014;86:1099–1104. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang R, Wang Y, Qiao J, Liu P, Geng L, Guo YL. Does human papillomavirus infection do harm to in-vitro fertilization outcomes and subsequent pregnancy outcomes? Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:683–687. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20121625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Agorastos T, Chatzistamatiou K, Zafrakas M, Siamanta V, Katsamagkas T, Constantinidis T, Lampropoulos A. Lysistrata Study Group: Distinct demographic factors influence the acceptance of vaccination against HPV. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:197–205. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3614-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:418–426. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Larsen B, Hwang J. Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A fresh look. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2010;2010(521921) doi: 10.1155/2010/521921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Biomedical Reports are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES