Abstract
Plasmonic supercrystals and periodically structured arrays comprise a class of materials with unique optical properties that result from the interplay of plasmon resonances, as well as near- and far-field coupling. Controlled synthesis of such hierarchical structures remains a fundamental challenge, as it demands strict control over the assembly morphology, array size, lateral spacing, and macroscale homogeneity. Current fabrication approaches involve complicated multistep procedures lacking scalability and reproducibility, which has hindered the practical application of plasmonic supercrystal arrays. Herein, these challenges are addressed by adding an organic solvent to achieve kinetic control over the template-assisted colloidal assembly of nanoparticles from aqueous dispersion. This method yields highly regular periodic arrays, with feature sizes ranging from less than 200 nm up to tens of microns. A combined experimental/computational approach reveals that the underlying mechanism is a combination of the removal of interfacial surfactant micelles from the particle interface and altered capillary flows. Assessing the efficacy of such square arrays for surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy, we find that a decrease of the lattice periodicity from 750 nm down to 400 nm boosts the signal by more than an order of magnitude, thereby enabling sensitive detection of analytes, such as the bacterial quorum sensing molecule pyocyanin, even in complex biological media.
Keywords: template-assisted self-assembly, gold nanorods, SERS, lattice plasmon, molecular dynamics simulation
Introduction
Due to their strong interaction with electromagnetic radiation, microarrays of plasmonic nanoparticles show great promise as components for high-performance optical sensors, light managing layers in thin-film solar cells, novel color displays, and other applications.1−6 In this context, tight control over the array dimensions, internal structure, and overall macroscopic homogeneity are crucial. The fabrication of plasmonic mesostructures (i.e., structures with feature sizes ranging from 100 nm to microns) with controlled properties still poses a significant challenge, as it requires bridging vastly different length scales, typically ranging from few nanometers up to several millimeters, for technological feasibility.7
Arrangements of noble-metal nanoparticles are the most common class of plasmonic nanomaterials for the fabrication of optical sensors, employed, for example, in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) or surface-enhanced infrared absorption (SEIRA) spectroscopy.3,8 These applications rely heavily on strong light–matter interactions in the resonant noble-metal structure carrying the analyte to be detected.3,9,10 Gold nanoparticles are often the material of choice, as their stability against oxidation grants easy fabrication of clean surfaces that can get into direct contact with analyte molecules. For biosensing in particular, gold displays further advantages due to its low cytotoxicity, which can be problematic when using other plasmonic nanomaterials such as silver or copper, for measurements in complex media or even in living systems. Among the many accessible shapes, anisotropic nanoparticles such as gold nanorods (AuNRs) excel due to the straightforward tunability of their localized surface plasmon resonances via chemical adjustment of the nanoparticles’ aspect ratio.11,12 This geometrical control allows precise tailoring of the desired excitation wavelength and even achieving optical monodispersity.13 Further signal enhancement, needed for chemical ultradetection or even single molecule detection, requires optimization of near-field and far-field coupling effects to boost light–matter interactions. A strong near-field coupling relies on interparticle distances of 1–2 nm,14−18 which in practice rules out purely top-down approaches such as e-beam lithography or focused ion beam milling, which are just about to reach gap dimensions below 5 nm.19 Far-field coupling, on the other hand, depends on diffraction and requires periodic arrays with close-to-perfect registration over extended areas.20 As a result, template-assisted self-assembly of noble-metal colloids is the currently preferred fabrication strategy, which efficiently combines both near-field and far-field coupling, to take full advantage of optical enhancement.21,22
For biomolecule detection, the ability to identify specific substances within complex mixtures (often at submicromolar concentrations) is of key importance and has fueled research in the field of SERS. Recent highlights include the detection of prostate-specific antigens in serum, multiplexed cancer type discrimination in cell cultures, and even SERS-based in vivo imaging of tumors.23 Self-assembled AuNR structures in particular have been used for the detection of scrambled prions or pyocyanin (a bacterial quorum-sensing molecule expressed by the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa) via SERS.24,25 The supercrystals used in these examples exhibit strong plasmonic near-field coupling due to the nanometer-sized interparticle distances, thereby allowing molecular detection in vitro in complex biological media, or even in situ in live bacterial cell cultures. However, in these examples, the nanoparticles were assembled into isolated supercrystals or micrometer-sized structures with array periodicities around 10 μm, and thus did not take advantage of far-field coupling. As shown by Reinhard et al. for micrometer-sized arrays, near-field coupled colloidal clusters can deliver significantly amplified signal outputs when arranged in a periodic lattice.26 The far-field modes of the array must therefore be in resonance with the exciting light source, usually demanding submicrometer lattice periodicities. These so-called lattice plasmons comprise an attractive route toward SERS substrates that offer high sensitivity with low noble metal consumption and a reduced laser power.22
Despite recent reports on the colloidal assembly of AuNRs into micrometer-sized supercrystals, the production of high-quality AuNR arrays with submicrometer feature sizes has proven to be an extraordinarily elusive task.27 Most of the current strategies are complicated, multistep procedures based on pre-assembly by spin or dip coating, followed by transfer printing onto a target substrate.28,29 In fact, there is little understanding of the factors influencing macroscopic array homogeneity, which include particle surface functionalization, residual surfactant, and wetting of both the stamp and the target substrate. Thus, the scaling and reproducibility of such assembly methods remain problematic. Recently, regular AuNR arrangements have been realized by combining topographically structured templates with controlled convective assembly or electrophoretic deposition techniques.30−32 However, to the best of our knowledge, no fast, scalable method is available that yields homogeneous arrays of regular AuNR mesostructures over macroscopic surface areas, with no need for sophisticated equipment.
We present herein an optimized approach for the self-assembly of gold nanorods (length: 55 ± 5 nm, diameter: 16.5 ± 1.5 nm) coated with (11-mercaptoundecyl)hexa(ethylene glycol) (MUHEG) into highly regular structures, using ethanol/water mixtures as the dispersion media. Functionalization with MUHEG has been shown to foster side-by-side organization of nanorods into structures with feature sizes between 1 and 50 μm for assembly from aqueous dispersions.27 In this work, much smaller, hierarchically structured plasmonic arrays with feature sizes ranging from 200 nm up to 10 μm and periodicities from 400 nm to 20 μm are realized by a solvent-assisted approach. Through systematic optimization of solvent composition and particle and surfactant concentrations, as well as a detailed investigation of the role of substrate application timing, mesostructured AuNR arrays with unprecedented quality are achieved over areas as large as 0.5 cm2. All-atom molecular dynamic (MD) simulations are used to elucidate the role of the volatile solvent (ethanol) in improving the nanoparticle self-assembly, which is experimentally confirmed by ζ-potential measurements. Ethanol is shown to strip away excess cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) micelles from the MUHEG/water interface, thereby increasing the hydrophobicity of the particles and triggering reversible agglomeration. We thus propose an assembly mechanism that takes into account the preorganization of nanoparticles at the liquid/gas interface, which is further confirmed by a kinetic study via photomicroscopy of drying droplets and correlated atomic force microscopy (AFM)/scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization of the resulting substrates. Finally, application of the obtained plasmonic materials as SERS sensors for biomolecule detection is demonstrated both in water and in complex biological media.
Results and Discussion
Template-assisted nanoparticle deposition has recently become a promising nanofabrication method that combines bottom-up and top-down approaches. The scalability of this method has been largely facilitated by the synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles in various shapes, with high monodispersity,33−35 along with simple and inexpensive production of microstructured stamps by soft lithography.16,36,37 However, the quality of the nanomaterial is often compromised because of the well-known coffee ring effect: inhomogeneous material distribution (in the worst case, accumulation outside of the structured area) is observed when the dispersed nanoparticles are driven toward the rim of the confined droplet during drying due to convective forces (Figure 1a).38 We recently reported that template-assisted assembly of sterically stabilized (i.e., poly(ethylene glycol)-capped) gold nanospheres (PEG–AuNSs) improved when the amount of residual surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) in the dispersion was kept far below its critical micellar concentration (cmc of CTAC: 1.6 mM at 25 °C).39 The most homogeneous structures were achieved with a surfactant concentration of around 50 μM, at which the nanospheres would slowly agglomerate in the dispersion, forming extended golden films on the hydrophobic walls of plastic storage vessels.22 For the MUHEG-coated rods used in this study, we could neither replicate the described effects nor sufficiently suppress the dominant coffee ring effect by simply decreasing the concentration of free surfactant, which was tested down to 30 μM residual surfactant (see Figures 1b and S2). To improve the wetting of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp,40 ethanol (EtOH) was added to the dispersions, thereby enabling a nearly complete suppression of the coffee ring formation, which had strongly hindered the fabrication of well-defined AuNR arrays over areas larger than a few hundred μm2.27 Unexpectedly, the presence of EtOH also changed the orientation of the nanorods from standing rods into side-by-side packed lamellae, as shown in Figures 1c and S3.
Intriguingly, ethanol-containing AuNR dispersions yielding high-quality assemblies displayed a macroscopic appearance reminiscent of previously described PEG–AuNS dispersions, i.e., a bright metallic luster.22 For fixed ambient temperature and humidity, this characteristic golden shimmer was consistently observed after a composition-controlled induction period, during which the alcohol/water mixture was allowed to evaporate partially: depending on particle concentration and EtOH content (see Materials and Methods in the Supporting Information (SI)), the drying droplets changed their appearance from dark brown to golden within seconds to minutes when AuNRs initiated pre-assembly at the air/liquid interface, as illustrated in Figure 2a.41 This pre-assembly process, not observed in purely aqueous dispersions, was found to consistently start at the droplet rim, i.e., the area of highest curvature and drying speed, indicating that the process is driven by convection due to EtOH evaporation.42 The macroscopic appearance of a droplet (insets of Figure 2b–d) at selected stages of evaporation can be correlated with the resulting mesostructures, as revealed by subsequent SEM measurements exemplified in Figure 2b–d. A clear relationship between the aggregation state of AuNRs at the air/liquid interface at the moment of contacting the substrate and the final particle distribution after drying was established: at short pre-assembly times, most of the liquid was found to move toward the nonpatterned rim of the PDMS stamp/substrate sandwich, where the particles would accumulate to form the characteristic coffee ring. The opposite trend was observed for long pre-assembly times, where extended particle aggregation led to overfilling of the patterned central region. Slight particle agglomeration turned out to be most advantageous, since medium-sized lamellar AuNR clusters possess a moderate hydrodynamic mobility and cannot easily migrate to the rim or accumulate at the center of the substrate/stamp sandwich (Figure S4).43 In general, the quality of the local array structure and the overall macroscopic surface homogeneity were optimal when the substrates were placed onto the stamp just before the surface of the droplets turned golden (see the SI: Materials and Methods and Figure S5).
A detailed kinetic study of the process for varying composition of the dispersion medium is summarized in Figure 3, which shows that an increase in the initial EtOH/H2O ratio has an effect similar to a reduced duration of the evaporation period. Four different morphologies can be distinguished, which are marked with frames of different colors: apart from the above discussed three scenarios, namely “underfilled” (red frame), “optimally filled” (green frame), and “overfilled” (blue frame), we found that for long evaporation periods or very low initial EtOH content, nearly empty substrate centers (black frame) were obtained. This emergence of a dominant coffee ring effect can be attributed to the redispersion of agglomerated particles after the evaporation of a major fraction of added EtOH (Figure S4).
With this effect in mind, we investigated whether the optimum time for contact with the substrate was determined by the EtOH/H2O ratio at the moment of substrate contact (i.e., independent of the concentration of dispersed particles), or by the amount of pre-assembled particle clusters at the droplet surface (i.e., strongly dependent on particle concentration in the dispersion). As shown in Figure 4 for fixed waiting time and initial EtOH/H2O ratio, increasing the particle concentration also lead to particle accumulation at the substrate centers (see Figure S6 for macroscopic characterization). We therefore conclude that the outcome of the assembly process is mainly determined by the state of particle agglomeration at the liquid–air interface at the moment of contact with the substrate.
To better understand the influence of EtOH on the assembly behavior of the AuNRs, the molecular interactions of MUHEG-coated Au surfaces in contact with the solvent were simulated using all-atom molecular dynamics. These simulations reproduced the environment of the AuNRs in the real dispersions, where CTAB was present at concentrations ranging from 30 to 500 μM. The equilibrated system shows that some CTA+ molecules reside within the MUHEG layer with their quaternary ammonium headgroups oriented toward the Au surface, whereas CTAB micelles form and reside at the MUHEG–water interface (Figure S7). In pure water, the CTAB micelle remained bound at the interface of the MUHEG layer for the entire duration of the simulation, which is attributed to minimization of the free energy by reducing the amount of interfacial water (Figure S7b). Following 200 ns of simulation in pure water, water molecules were removed from the system and replaced with either pure EtOH (Figure S8) or 52% (v/v) EtOH in water (Figure 5). As demonstrated by the timeline of the simulation trajectories, the introduction of EtOH results in a quick dissociation of the CTAB micelle from the MUHEG interface, even in a mixture with water (Figures 5a and S9).
Regardless of the initial position of the CTAB micelle at the MUHEG/solvent interface, dissociation of the micelle from the interface could be clearly observed after 100 ns, both in pure EtOH and in the water/EtOH mixture (Figures 5a and S8). Visual observations are confirmed by the radial distribution function of the quaternary ammonium headgroup of CTA+ interacting with the terminal −OH group of MUHEG, which was significantly decreased by the end of simulations in both EtOH and the water/EtOH mixture (Figure S9b,d). The electron density of the system over the simulation trajectory also exhibits the dissociation of the CTAB micelle from the MUHEG/solvent interface (Figure S9a,c). The removal of adsorbed CTAB micelles can explain both the experimentally observed clustering of AuNRs and their increased affinity toward the air–liquid interface, as the result of a more hydrophobic character of the particle coating.
To verify the mechanism supported by the MD simulations, we conducted ζ-potential and UV–vis spectroscopy measurements of AuNR colloids for varying CTAB and EtOH concentrations. In water, the particles exhibited a strongly positive ζ-potential, even far below the cmc of CTAB (e.g., +35 mV above 100 μM; Figure S10). With EtOH contents above 25% (v/v), however, the surface charge dropped, reaching 0 mV at 35% (v/v) and −10 mV at 45% (v/v) EtOH (Figure 5b). Whereas AuNRs were prepared and stored at CTAB concentrations above the cmc (1 mM), ζ-potential measurements were conducted after dilution, well below the cmc (30 μM ≤ [CTAB] ≤ 500 μM). These data support the hypothesis that, in water, CTAB micelles remain bound to the AuNR–MUHEG interface far below the cmc ([CTAB] ≥ 30 μM) but are readily removed by EtOH. The resulting loss of colloidal stability is mirrored in the UV–vis spectra (Figure 5c) showing peaks around 600 nm that are characteristic for side-to-side aggregation of AuNRs.44 Collectively, these results make a strong case for the idea that EtOH efficiently triggers the agglomeration and surface activity of AuNRs, thereby reducing particle mobility during drying and ultimately leading to a strongly altered self-assembly behavior. Similar trapping of nanoparticles at the liquid–air interface has been recognized as a method for reducing coffee stains and building highly ordered close-packed layers.41
Interestingly, the surfactant concentration itself influences the structure of self-assembled AuNR arrays in a counter-intuitive manner. Whereas for dispersions in pure water the quality of the assembly deteriorated when increasing the surfactant concentration, EtOH-containing dispersions were less influenced by this parameter, as CTAB concentrations up to 500 μM did not significantly alter the homogeneity and array dimensions. However, the concentration of free surfactant did influence the average height of the individual posts, leading to roughly 3-fold higher structures when CTAB concentration was increased from 20 up to 500 μM (Figure 6). As the volume occupied by CTAB is negligible compared to the volume of gold in all cases (around 100 μM CTAB vs 100 mM Au0), such height differences must be caused by varying amounts of particles being deposited outside the patterned stamp area.
Potential explanations for this behavior are changes of the stamp wetting and meniscus shape during late drying stages, or the interplay of solute- and surfactant-driven Marangoni flows that influence particle repartition.43,45−47 Although this behavior beckons a separate in-depth investigation, we further explore the efficacy of substrates produced by this assembly approach for molecular ultradetection. As shown in Figure 7, this kinetically controlled assembly technique paves the way to highly regular AuNR arrays with feature sizes ranging from 200 nm up to tens of microns.
In a recent work, we demonstrated that arrangement of gold nanoparticles into periodic microarrays can significantly boost SERS sensitivity via tailored lattice plasmon resonances.22 Such lattice plasmon resonances typically occur near a Rayleigh anomaly, i.e., a strong change of reflectivity due to diffraction at the metal grating.48 For square arrays of gold nanoparticles, the lattice resonance wavelength can be approximated as λmax = Lnsubs, where the lattice parameter L corresponds to the center-to-center distance between neighboring posts and nsubs to the refractive index of the substrate.49,50 Shown in Figure 7 are AuNR arrays with L ranging from 20 μm down to 400 nm. The corresponding extinction spectra (Figure S11) show that for each lattice parameter, distinct resonance peaks arise near the predicted position of the Rayleigh anomaly. Exploitation of these lattice resonances in SERS spectroscopy demands precise matching with the wavelength of the excitation laser and therefore requires highly regular arrays with submicrometer periodicities for the typically employed UV–vis/NIR Raman setups.2,51
To assess these substrates in a practical sensing application, we chose the bacterial pigment/toxin pyocyanin as a probe molecule. Pyocyanin is a Raman-active quorum-sensing molecule expressed by P. aeruginosa, which can be detected by SERS using NIR excitation.25 The SERS spectra of pyocyanin in water and Luria–Bertrani (LB) bacterial growth medium were recorded using patterned substrates with lattice parameters between 400 nm and 1.66 μm (corresponding to feature dimensions between 200 nm and 1 μm; see SI Table S1), as shown in Figure 8. A 785 nm laser was chosen as the excitation source because it targets both the first transparency window of biological systems and the excitation wavelength of the analyte molecule. In fact, this laser is the most widespread light source for Raman and other optical measurements in biological media due to its relatively low tendency to cause photoluminescence emission overlaying the signals.22 With the excitation at 785 nm, one would expect the highest signal enhancement for a lattice parameter L = 500 nm, for which a resonance around 770 nm is predicted by the formula for λmax above.
Compared to arrays with micrometer-sized lattices, the arrangements with submicrometer lattice parameters indeed give rise to significantly enhanced SERS: in Figure 8a, the SERS spectrum of pyocyanin in water recorded on a 1.66 μm lattice shows the dominant Raman modes (1352 and ∼1600 cm–1), with a meager signal of ∼1000 counts/s, whereas the miniaturized arrays with lattice parameters of 400 and 500 nm have close to 25-fold intensity. Plotting the signal intensity of the dominant mode at 1600 cm–1 (from phenyl ring deformation and C–C stretching) against the lattice parameter (Figure 8b) clearly reveals an inverse correlation of feature size and SERS intensity. As all the probed substrates have a very similar percentage of effective area covered with nanoparticles (25–27%), the observed trends must arise from the different lattice parameters and increasing surface-to-volume ratios with decreasing feature size. Figure 8c displays the dependence of the SERS signal at 1600 cm–1 on the pyocyanin concentration in water, for the best substrate (shown in Figure 7d), suggesting a detection limit of approximately 10–12 M.
For SERS-based clinical diagnostics, measuring in complex biofluids represents a significant challenge due to fouling of the plasmonic metal surface with biomolecules, which restricts the access of the analyte to the surface and thus reduces signal enhancement. In a recent study, we showed that micron-scale arrays of gold nanoparticles allowed ultrasensitive in situ detection of pyocyanin in cultures of P. aeruginosa, when coated with mesoporous silica. The mesoporous layer acted as a sieve to prevent larger proteins and biomolecules from fouling the gold nanoparticle interface while allowing the percolation and detection of small molecules down to femtomolar concentrations.25 In another recent study, a nacre-like film impregnated with AuNPs exhibited a similar increase in signal due to filtration by the porous polymer network compared to a film of bare AuNPs.52 Intriguingly, we observe that although the lack of such a filtration layer leads to a moderate signal background from the adsorption of biomolecules like peptides and yeast tryptone, the submicrometer patterned substrates introduced in this work still yield very clear SERS spectra in biological media (Figure 8d).
Conclusions
A kinetically controlled approach for the template-assisted assembly of plasmonic nanoparticles, which relies on the addition of alcohol to aqueous AuNP dispersions, is reported herein. This approach largely improves the large-scale reproducibility and overall quality of the resulting arrays. As the crucial experimental parameters in this method, we identified the dispersion medium composition, solvent evaporation time, particle concentration, and surfactant concentration. A strong correlation was found between particle pre-assembly at the droplet–air interface and quality of the resulting final substrate. Through a combination of experiments and simulations, the underlying mechanism for this effect was studied, supporting the idea that the removal of residual surfactant micelles from the interface of the MUHEG-coating on the particles plays a crucial role in the self-assembly behavior. The resulting colloidal destabilization leads to enhanced surface activity and partial agglomeration of the gold nanoparticles, which turned out to be advantageous for creating homogeneous AuNR arrays over mm2 areas. This method enables the routine fabrication of high-quality periodic arrays with submicrometer features and was found to be easier, faster, and more reliable than common multistep methods based on spin or dip coating and subsequent transfer printing.
The resulting structures successfully combine plasmonic and photonic resonances to deliver significant improvements in SERS sensor fabrication. Consequently, they allow sensitive biomolecule detection with substantially reduced material costs and preparative effort, as demonstrated with the bacterial pathogen pyocyanin both in water and Luria–Bertrani medium. The capability of these substrates for detecting bacterial quorum-sensing molecules in bacterial growth medium, even without an additional filtration layer, should facilitate in situ studies of bacterial growth/quorum sensing via SERS and could be particularly useful for studying the effects of surface topography on bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.53 Finally, we propose that the particle assembly mechanism discussed herein is of a universal nature and could have important implications for the field of template-assisted colloidal assembly. We therefore expect this proof of concept to trigger deeper investigations utilizing nanoparticles of varied materials composition and surface functionalization, as well as the exploration of a plethora of pattern designs and target substrates.
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the Spanish MINECO (Grant No. MAT2017-86659-R). C.H. acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for funding in the framework of a Feodor Lynen fellowship. E.H.H. acknowledges the receipt of a Juan de la Cierva-fellowship (FJCI-2014-22598). A.M. is grateful to the funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 637116, ENLIGHTMENT) and funding by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) (Grant Nos. SEV-2015-0496 and MAT2016-79053-P). The authors further thank Mathias Charconnet for fruitful discussions and Vished Kumar for TEM imaging. This work was performed under the Maria de Maeztu Units of Excellence Program from the Spanish State Research Agency (Grant No. MDM-2017-0720). We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b00334.
Experimental part; characterization of nanoparticles and large area substrates by electron microscopy; microscopic investigation of an evaporating AuNR dispersion droplet; study of the impact of evaporation time and particle concentration on macroscopic substrate homogeneity; additional simulations of the interaction of CTAB with MUHEG-coated AuNRs in water and EtOH; UV–vis and ζ-potential data of MUHEG–AuNRs with varying CTAB concentration; optical characterization of the substrates by UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy (PDF)
Author Present Address
∥ Institute of Advanced Ceramics, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany (E.H.H.).
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Knight M. W.; Sobhani H.; Nordlander P.; Halas N. J. Photodetection with Active Optical Antennas. Science 2011, 332, 702–704. 10.1126/science.1203056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan B.; Boriskina S. V.; Reinhard B. M. Design and Implementation of Noble Metal Nanoparticle Cluster Arrays for Plasmon Enhanced Biosensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 24437–24453. 10.1021/jp207821t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bagheri S.; Weber K.; Gissibl T.; Weiss T.; Neubrech F.; Giessen H. Fabrication of Square-Centimeter Plasmonic Nanoantenna Arrays by Femtosecond Direct Laser Writing Lithography: Effects of Collective Excitations on SEIRA Enhancement. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 779–786. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karg M.; König T. A. F.; Retsch M.; Stelling C.; Reichstein P. M.; Honold T.; Thelakkat M.; Fery A. Colloidal Self-Assembly Concepts for Light Management in Photovoltaics. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 185–205. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen T.; Reinhard B. M. Assembling Color on the Nanoscale: Multichromatic Switchable Pixels From Plasmonic Atoms and Molecules. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3522–3527. 10.1002/adma.201506179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pastoriza-Santos I.; Kinnear C.; Perez-Juste J.; Mulvaney P.; Liz-Marzan L. M. Plasmonic Polymer Nanocomposites. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 375–391. 10.1038/s41578-018-0050-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kraus T.; Brodoceanu D.; Pazos-Pérez N.; Fery A. Colloidal Surface Assemblies: Nanotechnology Meets Bioinspiration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 4529–4541. 10.1002/adfm.201203885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schlücker S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Concepts and Chemical Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4756–4795. 10.1002/anie.201205748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu N.; Mesch M.; Weiss T.; Hentschel M.; Giessen H. Infrared Perfect Absorber and Its Application as Plasmonic Sensor. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2342–2348. 10.1021/nl9041033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petefish J. W.; Hillier A. C. Angle-Tunable Enhanced Infrared Reflection Absorption Spectroscopy via Grating-Coupled Surface Plasmon Resonance. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 2610–2617. 10.1021/ac4038398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ye X.; Zheng C.; Chen J.; Gao Y.; Murray C. B. Using Binary Surfactant Mixtures to Simultaneously Improve the Dimensional Tunability and Monodispersity in the Seeded Growth of Gold Nanorods. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 765–771. 10.1021/nl304478h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Link S.; El-Sayed M. A. Shape and Size Dependence of Radiative, Non-Radiative and Photothermal Properties of Gold Nanocrystals. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2000, 19, 409–453. 10.1080/01442350050034180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- González-Rubio G.; Díaz-Núñez P.; Rivera A.; Prada A.; Tardajos G.; González-Izquierdo J.; Bañares L.; Llombart P.; Macdowell L. G.; Alcolea Palafox M.; Liz-Marzán L. M.; Peña-Rodríguez O.; Guerrero-Martínez A. Femtosecond Laser Reshaping Yields Gold Nanorods with Ultranarrow Surface Plasmon Resonances. Science 2017, 358, 640–644. 10.1126/science.aan8478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Camden J. P.; Dieringer J. A.; Wang Y.; Masiello D. J.; Marks L. D.; Schatz G. C.; Van Duyne R. P. Probing the Structure of Single-Molecule Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Hot Spots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12616–12617. 10.1021/ja8051427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slaughter L. S.; Wang L.-Y.; Willingham B. A.; Olson J. M.; Swanglap P.; Dominguez-Medina S.; Link S. Plasmonic Polymers Unraveled Through Single Particle Spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11451–11461. 10.1039/C4NR02839B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanske C.; Tebbe M.; Kuttner C.; Bieber V.; Tsukruk V. V.; Chanana M.; König T. A. F.; Fery A. Strongly Coupled Plasmonic Modes on Macroscopic Areas via Template-Assisted Colloidal Self-Assembly. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6863–6871. 10.1021/nl502776s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian C.; Deng Y.; Zhao D.; Fang J. Plasmonic Silver Supercrystals with Ultrasmall Nanogaps for Ultrasensitive SERS-Based Molecule Detection. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2015, 3, 404–411. 10.1002/adom.201400576. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kang M.; Park S.-G.; Jeong K.-H. Repeated Solid-state Dewetting of Thin Gold Films for Nanogap-Rich Plasmonic Nanoislands. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14790 10.1038/srep14790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruchhaus L.; Mazarov P.; Bischoff L.; Gierak J.; Wieck A. D.; Hövel H. Comparison of Technologies for Nano Device Prototyping with a Special Focus on Ion Beams: a Review. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 011302 10.1063/1.4972262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang D.; Yang A.; Wang W.; Hua Y.; Schaller R. D.; Schatz G. C.; Odom T. W. Band-Edge Engineering for Controlled Multi-Modal Nanolasing in Plasmonic Superlattices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 889–894. 10.1038/nnano.2017.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui Y.; Björk M. T.; Liddle J. A.; Sönnichsen C.; Boussert B.; Alivisatos A. P. Integration of Colloidal Nanocrystals Into Lithographically Patterned Devices. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1093–1098. 10.1021/nl049488i. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Matricardi C.; Hanske C.; Garcia-Pomar J. L.; Langer J.; Mihi A.; Liz-Marzan L. M. Gold Nanoparticle Plasmonic Superlattices as Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Substrates. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8531–8539. 10.1021/acsnano.8b04073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanske C.; Sanz-Ortiz M. N.; Liz-Marzan L. M. Silica-Coated Plasmonic Metal Nanoparticles in Action. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707003 10.1002/adma.201707003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez-Puebla R. A.; Agarwal A.; Manna P.; Khanal B. P.; Aldeanueva-Potel P.; Carbó-Argibay E.; Pazos-Pérez N.; Vigderman L.; Zubarev E. R.; Kotov N. A.; Liz-Marzán L. M. Gold Nanorods 3D-Supercrystals as Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy Substrates for the Rapid Detection of Scrambled Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 8157–8161. 10.1073/pnas.1016530108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bodelón G.; Montes-García V.; López-Puente V.; Hill E. H.; Hamon C.; Sanz-Ortiz M. N.; Rodal-Cedeira S.; Costas C.; Celiksoy S.; Perez-Juste J.; Pastoriza-Santos I.; Liz-Marzán L. M.; et al. Detection and Imaging of Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Communities by Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 1203–1211. 10.1038/nmat4720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan B.; Thubagere A.; Premasiri W. R.; Ziegler L. D.; Dal Negro L.; Reinhard B. M. Engineered SERS Substrates with Multiscale Signal Enhancement: Nanoparticle Cluster Arrays. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1190–1202. 10.1021/nn800836f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamon C.; Novikov S.; Scarabelli L.; Basabe-Desmonts L.; Liz-Marzán L. M. Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Gold Nanoparticles Into Patterned Plasmonic Nanostructures. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10694–10703. 10.1021/nn504407z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horn A.; Schoberth H. G.; Hiltl S.; Chiche A.; Wang Q.; Schweikart A.; Fery A.; Böker A. Nanostructured Wrinkled Surfaces for Templating Bionanoparticles-Controlling and Quantifying the Degree of Order. Faraday Discuss. 2009, 143, 143–150. 10.1039/b902721a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tebbe M.; Mayer M.; Glatz B. A.; Hanske C.; Probst P. T.; Müller M. B.; Karg M.; Chanana M.; König T. A. F.; Kuttner C.; Fery A. Optically Anisotropic Substrates via Wrinkle-Assisted Convective Assembly of Gold Nanorods on Macroscopic Areas. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 181, 243–260. 10.1039/C4FD00236A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuemin C.; Nowack L.; Bozano L.; Spencer N. D.; Wolf H. Oriented Assembly of Gold Nanorods on the Single-Particle Level. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 702–708. 10.1002/adfm.201101760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Flauraud V.; Mastrangeli M.; Bernasconi G. D.; Butet J.; Alexander D. T. L.; Shahrabi E.; Martin O. J. F.; Brugger J. Nanoscale Topographical Control of Capillary Assembly of Nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 73–80. 10.1038/nnano.2016.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H.; Cadusch J.; Kinnear C.; James T.; Roberts A.; Mulvaney P. Direct Assembly of Large Area Nanoparticle Arrays. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 7529–7537. 10.1021/acsnano.8b02932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Y.; Zhong X.; Li Z.; Xia Y. Successive, Seed-Mediated Growth for the Synthesis of Single-Crystal Gold Nanospheres with Uniform Diameters Controlled in the Range of 5–150 Nm. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 266–273. 10.1002/ppsc.201300256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- O’Brien M. N.; Jones M. R.; Brown K. A.; Mirkin C. A. Universal Noble Metal Nanoparticle Seeds Realized Through Iterative Reductive Growth and Oxidative Dissolution Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7603–7606. 10.1021/ja503509k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scarabelli L.; Sánchez-Iglesias A.; Perez-Juste J.; Liz-Marzán L. M. A “Tips and Tricks” Practical Guide to the Synthesis of Gold Nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4270–4279. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin D.; Xia Y.; Whitesides G. M. Soft Lithography for Micro- and Nanoscale Patterning. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 491–502. 10.1038/nprot.2009.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraus T.; Malaquin L.; Schmid H.; Riess W.; Spencer N. D.; Wolf H. Nanoparticle Printing with Single-Particle Resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 570–576. 10.1038/nnano.2007.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deegan R. D.; Bakajin O.; Dupont T. F.; Huber G.; Nagel S. R.; Witten T. A. Capillary Flow as the Cause of Ring Stains From Dried Liquid Drops. Nature 1997, 389, 827–829. 10.1038/39827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nomura T.; Asai Y.; Murahashi N.; Iwamoto K. Formation of Spherical Micelles by the Novel Platelet Activating Factor Receptor Antagonist, E5880. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 947–950. 10.1248/cpb.48.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vazquez G.; Alvarez E.; Navaza J. M. Surface Tension of Alcohol Water + Water From 20 to 50 °C. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1995, 40, 611–614. 10.1021/je00019a016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bigioni T. P.; Lin X. M.; Nguyen T. T.; Corwin E. I.; Witten T. A.; Jaeger H. M. Kinetically Driven Self Assembly of Highly Ordered Nanoparticle Monolayers. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 265–270. 10.1038/nmat1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deegan R. D.; Bakajin O.; Dupont T. F.; Huber G.; Nagel S. R.; Witten T. A. Contact Line Deposits in an Evaporating Drop. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 756–765. 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim H.; Boulogne F.; Um E.; Jacobi I.; Button E.; Stone H. A. Controlled Uniform Coating From the Interplay of Marangoni Flows and Surface-Adsorbed Macromolecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 124501 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.124501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funston A. M.; Novo C.; Davis T. J.; Mulvaney P. Plasmon Coupling of Gold Nanorods at Short Distances and in Different Geometries. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1651–1658. 10.1021/nl900034v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karpitschka S.; Riegler H. Noncoalescence of Sessile Drops From Different but Miscible Liquids: Hydrodynamic Analysis of the Twin Drop Contour as a Self-Stabilizing Traveling Wave. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 066103 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.066103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li P.; Li Y.; Zhou Z.-K.; Tang S.; Yu X.-F.; Xiao S.; Wu Z.; Xiao Q.; Zhao Y.; Wang H.; Chu P. K. Evaporative Self-Assembly of Gold Nanorods Into Macroscopic 3D Plasmonic Superlattice Arrays. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2511–2517. 10.1002/adma.201505617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sempels W.; De Dier R.; Mizuno H.; Hofkens J.; Vermant J. Auto-Production of Biosurfactants Reverses the Coffee Ring Effect in a Bacterial System. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1757 10.1038/ncomms2746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khlopin D.; Laux F.; Wardley W. P.; Martin J.; Wurtz G. A.; Plain J.; Bonod N.; Zayats A. V.; Dickson W.; Gérard D. Lattice Modes and Plasmonic Linewidth Engineering in Gold and Aluminum Nanoparticle Arrays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2017, 34, 691–700. 10.1364/JOSAB.34.000691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo R.; Hakala T. K.; Törmä P. Geometry Dependence of Surface Lattice Resonances in Plasmonic Nanoparticle Arrays. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 155423 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Auguié B.; Bendaña X. M.; Barnes W. L.; García de Abajo F. J. Diffractive Arrays of Gold Nanoparticles Near an Interface: Critical Role of the Substrate. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 155447 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.155447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Y.; Zhang X.; Ringe E.; Hou M.; Ma L.; Zhang Z. Tunable Lattice Coupling of Multipole Plasmon Modes and Near-Field Enhancement in Closely Spaced Gold Nanorod Arrays. Sci. Rep. 2016, 23159 10.1038/srep23159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill E. H.; Hanske C.; Johnson A.; Yate L.; Jelitto H.; Schneider G. A.; Liz-Marzán L. M. Metal Nanoparticle Growth Within Clay–Polymer Nacre-Inspired Materials for Improved Catalysis and Plasmonic Detection in Complex Biofluids. Langmuir 2017, 33, 8774–8783. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill E. H.; Liz-Marzán L. M. Toward Plasmonic Monitoring of Surface Effects on Bacterial Quorum-Sensing. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 32, 1–10. 10.1016/j.cocis.2017.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.