Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2019 Jan 7;179(3):433–435. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5303

Analysis of Gender Equity in Leadership of Physician-Focused Medical Specialty Societies, 2008-2017

Julie K Silver 1,, Reem Ghalib 2, Julie A Poorman 1, Dana Al-Assi 3, Sareh Parangi 4, Hansa Bhargava 5, Sasha K Shillcutt 6
PMCID: PMC6439704  PMID: 30615072

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines gender equity in the presidential leadership of medical specialty societies over a 10-year period.


The long-standing underrepresentation of women among medical academic leaders (deans, chairs, and professors) is well documented. However, little is known about trends in medical society leadership. Because tenure in society leadership positions contributes to academic advancement and provides opportunities to influence both the organization and the medical specialty, it is crucial to begin examining the demographics of society leadership.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we identified 1 major physician-focused medical society for each of the 43 specialty groupings listed in the 2016 Physician Specialty Data Report (Table).1 We generally selected the largest and/or most influential society in the field. Groupings for internal medicine/pediatrics, neonatal-perinatal medicine, pediatric cardiology, and pediatric hematology/oncology (4 of 43 groupings) were then excluded because physicians in these specialties generally belong to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). The primary outcome measures were years of presidential leadership attributed to men and women. To minimize some lack of independence across years, which is even greater for societies using 2-year presidential terms (4 of 39 societies; Table), data were collected for a 10-year period (2008-2017), allowing for a minimum of 5 election cycles. For 38 societies, presidents’ names were assigned to the year of election. For the AAP, which changed the start of its presidential term from fall to January in 2014, presidents elected before 2014 were assigned to the year following election. Gender was determined and verified via publicly available online profiles. One-sample tests of proportions comparing the percentage of women among association presidents with the percentage of women in active practice (Figure) were used to determine the significance (2-sided P values) of underrepresentation or overrepresentation.1,2,3 The Partners Human Research Committee/institutional review board determined that review of the study and participant written consent were not required.

Table. Profiles of Included Medical Specialty Societies.

AAMC Specialty Grouping No. of Active Physicians in 2015a Active Women Physicians in 2015, No. (%)a Medical Specialty Society Assessed (Abbreviation) Presidential Term, y Years With Woman President, %b Difference, %c
Allergy and immunology 4628 1675 (36.2) American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology (AAAAI) 1 10 −26.2
Anatomic/clinical pathology 13 277 4869 (36.7) College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2 0 −36.7
Anesthesiology 41 306 10 276 (24.9) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 10 −14.9
Cardiovascular disease 22 038 2908 (13.2) American College of Cardiology (ACC) 1 10 −3.2
Child and adolescent psychiatry 8731 4519 (51.8) American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) 2 30 −21.8
Critical care medicine 10 143 2588 (25.5) Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) 1 40 14.5
Dermatology 11 696 5514 (47.1) American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) 1 0 −47.1
Emergency medicine 39 547 10 509 (26.6) American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 1 30 3.4
Endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism 6957 3231 (46.4) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) 1 10 −36.4
Family medicine/general practice 111 127 42 685 (38.4) American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) 1 20 −18.4
Gastroenterology 14 107 2307 (16.4) American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) 1 10 −6.4
General surgery 25 233 4835 (19.2) American College of Surgeons (ACS) 1 20 0.8
Geriatric medicine 5221 2673 (51.2) American Geriatrics Society (AGS) 1 60 8.8
Hematology and oncology 14 457 4611 (31.9) American Society of Hematology (ASH) 1 30 −1.9
Infectious disease 8501 3371 (39.7) Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 1 20 −19.7
Internal medicine 113 871 41 951 (36.8) American College of Physicians (ACP) 1 20 −16.8
Interventional cardiology 3248 240 (7.4) Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 1 0 −7.4
Nephrology 10 070 2751 (27.3) American Society of Nephrology (ASN) 1 30 2.7
Neurological surgery 5343 419 (7.8) American Association of Neurologic Surgeons (AANS) 1 0 −7.8
Neurology 13 378 3760 (28.1) American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 2 0 −28.1
Neuroradiology 3289 642 (19.5) American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) 1 40 20.5
Obstetrics and gynecology 41 446 22 585 (54.5) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 1 10 −44.5
Ophthalmology 18 584 4436 (23.9) American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) 1 20 −3.9
Orthopedic surgery 19 142 951 (5.0) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) 1 0 −5.0
Otolaryngology 9405 1485 (15.8) American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) 1 20 4.2
Pain medicine and pain management 4595 840 (18.3) American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) 1 0 −18.3
Pediatrics 57 491 35 573 (61.9) American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 1 30 −31.9
Physical medicine and rehabilitation 9137 3204 (35.1) American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) 1 20 −15.1
Plastic surgery 7017 1050 (15.0) American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) 1 10 −5.0
Preventive medicine 6588 2160 (32.8) American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) 2 20 −12.8
Psychiatry 37 717 14 335 (38.0) American Psychiatric Association (APA) 1 50 12.0
Pulmonary disease 5480 615 (11.2) American Thoracic Society (ATS) 1 30 18.8
Radiation oncology 4845 1312 (27.1) American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 1 10 −17.1
Radiology and diagnostic radiology 27 505 6799 (24.7) Radiologic Society of North America (RSNA) 1 30 5.3
Rheumatology 5599 2378 (42.5) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1 30 −12.5
Thoracic surgery 4484 271 (6.0) American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 1 0 −6.0
Urology 9804 780 (8.0) American Urologic Association (AUA) 1 0 −8.0
Vascular and interventional radiology 2966 273 (9.2) Society of Interventional Radiologists (SIR) 1 0 −9.2
Vascular surgery 3356 379 (11.3) Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) 1 10 −1.3

Abbreviation: AAMC, Association of American Medical Colleges.

a

Data from Association of American Medical Colleges. 2016 Physician specialty data report: active physicians by sex and specialty, 2015. table 1.3. https://www.aamc.org/data/workforce/reports/458712/1-3-chart.html. Published 2015. Accessed January 30, 2017.

b

From 2008 to 2017; n = 10

c

The percentage of years with a woman president vs the percentage of women among active physicians in 2015. Positive values indicate equitable or better representation of women among years of presidential leadership. Negative values indicate lower than equitable levels of representation of women among years of presidential leadership.

Figure. Representation of Women Among Presidential Leaders of 39 Major Medical Specialty Societies by Year From 2008 to 2017.

Figure.

Because society membership information generally was not publicly available and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) did not report workforce data in every specialty grouping or every year during the study period, the percentages of women physicians in active practice as reported by the AAMC are only available for 2010 (30.4%),2 2013 (32.6%),3 and 2015 (34.0%).1 Error bars indicate the 95% CIs for the percentage of women among presidential leaders.

Results

Between 2008 and 2017, presidential leadership was held predominantly by men, with men serving as presidents in 82.6% of years (322 of 390 years) vs women serving as presidents in 17.4% of years (68 of 390 years). Women were underrepresented overall but were significantly underrepresented in 2015 in terms of the percentage of women among society presidents vs the percentage of women among active physicians (15.4% vs 34.0%; P = .01) (Figure). The Society of Critical Care Medicine, American Society of Neuroradiology, American Psychiatric Association, and American Geriatrics Society had the highest number of years with women presidential leaders (4-6 of 10 years; Table). In contrast, 10 societies had 0 of 10 years with women presidential leaders.

To gain perspective on the representation of women in top leadership roles, data on presidents from each society were compared with the representation of women among active physicians in the respective specialty grouping in 2015 (Table).1 We were limited to this single comparison because the Association of American Medical Colleges workforce data were not reported in consistent specialty groupings or at consistent intervals during the study period, and society membership information generally was not publicly available. Equitable or better representation (positive differences) was found in 10 societies. However, gaps (negative differences) were found in 29 societies, with the 5 largest gaps (>30%) found in the American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, College of American Pathologists, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and AAP.

Discussion

Society leadership has a role in academic advancement, and leaders may exert considerable influence on their organizations and specialties. Our finding of sustained underrepresentation of women within the critical post of society president highlights a challenge to achievement of gender equity in medicine that persists today. We suspect that barriers to equitable representation of women within societies may have affected women’s ability to ascend to presidential leadership, though we have data only for selected societies and no data on internal processes used during selection of presidential leaders.4,5,6 Our results suggest that efforts to improve diversity and inclusion may have been more successful in some societies than in others. Therefore, societies must prioritize examination and mitigation of disparities in the inclusion and support of members and report both challenges and successful strategies.4,5

References

  • 1.Association of American Medical Colleges. 2016 Physician specialty data report: active physicians by sex and specialty, 2015. table 1.3. https://www.aamc.org/data/workforce/reports/458712/1-3-chart.html. Published 2015. Accessed January 30, 2017.
  • 2.Association of American Medical Colleges Center for Workforce Studies 2012 Physician Specialty Data Book. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Association of American Medical Colleges Center for Workforce Studies 2014 Physician Specialty Data Book. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Silver JK, Cuccurullo SJ, Ambrose AF, et al. Association of Academic Physiatrists women’s task force report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(9):680-690. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Silver JK, Slocum CS, Bank AM, et al. Where are the women? the underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PM R. 2017;9(8):804-815. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Silver JK, Poorman JA, Reilly JM, Spector N, Goldstein R, Zafonte RD. Assessment of women physicians among authors of perspective-type articles published in high-impact pediatric journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(3):e180802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES