Abstract
Background
Necrotic enteritis (NE) is caused by type A strains of the bacterium Clostridium perfringens. Total global economic losses to the poultry industry due to NE is estimated to be over two billion dollars annually. Traditionally, NE has been effectively controlled by inclusion of antibiotics in the diet of poultry. However, recent concerns regarding the impact of this practice on increasing antibiotic resistance in human pathogens have led us to consider alternative approaches, such as vaccination, for controlling this disease. NE strains of C. perfringens produce two major toxins, a-toxin and NetB. Immune responses against either toxin can provide partial protection against NE.
Methods
We have developed a fusion protein combining a non-toxic carboxyl-terminal domain of a-toxin (PlcC) and an attenuated, mutant form of NetB (NetB-W262A) for use as a vaccine antigen to immunize poultry against NE. We utilized a DNA sequence that was codon-optimized for Nicotiana benthamiana to enable high levels of expression. The 6-His tagged PlcC-NetB fusion protein was synthesized in N. benthamiana using a geminiviral replicon transient expression system, purified by metal affinity chromatography, and used to immunize broiler birds.
Results
Immunized birds produced a strong serum IgY response against both the plant produced PlcC-NetB protein and against bacterially produced His-PlcC and His-NetB. Immunized birds were significantly protected against a subsequent in-feed challenge with virulent C. perfringens when treated with the fusion protein. These results indicate that a plant-produced PlcC-NetB toxoid is a promising vaccine candidate for controlling NE in poultry.
Keywords: Clostridium perfringens, Plant-based antigen production, Necrotic enteritis vaccine, Poultry vaccine
Introduction
Clostridium perfringens, a Gram-positive anaerobic spore-forming bacterium, is the causative agent of necrotic enteritis (NE) in poultry and has become an economically significant issue for the broiler industry (Timbermont et al., 2011). The pathogenesis of NE is complex and results from the concerted actions of a number of Clostridial genes combined with reduced gut health generated by environmental factors, feed, mycotoxins or the presence of other pathogens (Prescott et al., 2016; Shivaramaiah et al., 2011). NE typically occurs in broiler chicks at two-six weeks of age, but may occur in older birds as well (Cooper & Songer, 2010; Cooper, Songer & Uzal, 2013). The onset of NE at around two weeks is believed to be due to waning levels of anti-Clostridium maternal antibodies (Cooper, Songer & Uzal, 2013). The acute form of the disease leads to increased mortality in broiler flocks, which can account for high losses of up to 1% per day, reaching mortality rates up to 10–40% (McDevitt et al., 2006). In the subclinical form, damage to the intestinal mucosa caused by C. perfringens leads to poor productivity (reduced growth, reduced feed efficiency) without mortality. The estimated cost of subclinical NE is around $0.05 per chicken with a total global loss of nearly $2 billion per year (McReynolds et al., 2004; Van Der Sluis, 2000).
Clostridium perfringens is ubiquitous; readily found in soil, dust, feces, feed, used poultry litter and is normally present in the intestines of healthy chickens. The enterotoxaemia that results in clinical disease most often occurs either following an alteration in the intestinal microflora or from a condition that results in damage to the intestinal mucosa (e.g., coccidiosis). High dietary levels of animal by-products such as fishmeal, or certain grains with high levels of indigestible fiber including wheat, barley, oats, and rye predispose birds to NE. Dietary fat source can also influence the C. perfringens population (Knarreborg et al., 2002). Current thinking is that predisposing factors such as a high protein diet (e.g., fishmeal) and/or Eimeria infection result in alterations of the chicken gut microbiota that allow incoming or resident C. perfringens strains to become established (Stanley et al., 2014).
Historically, C. perfringens outbreaks in the broiler industry were avoided using growth-promoting antimicrobials in the diet. However, concerns regarding antibiotic resistance led to restrictions on the use of antibiotics (Butaye, Devriese & Haesebrouck, 2003). When antibiotics were banned in European and Scandinavian countries, it led to increases in C. perfringens infections, including NE (Van Immerseel et al., 2004). Thus, other methods for controlling C. perfringens infections are needed.
Toxins have traditionally been targeted as antigens of interest for controlling clostridial infections. The C. perfringens α-toxin, encoded by the plc gene, is the major virulence determinant for gas gangrene (Titball, Naylor & Basak, 1999). Antibodies to C. perfringens α-toxin prevent gas gangrene in mice (Williamson & Titball, 1993). The protein is divided into two domains; the amino-terminal domain and carboxy-terminal domain (Naylor et al., 1998). The amino-terminal domain encodes the catalytic site responsible for phospholipase activity (Naylor et al., 1998; Guillouard, Garnier & Cole, 1996; Titball et al., 1991), while the carboxy-terminal domain is involved in interactions with phospholipids, targeting the enzyme to host cell membranes (Guillouard et al., 1997). The α-toxin carboxy-terminal fragment (aa 247–370) is non-toxic (Titball, Fearn & Williamson, 1993) and immunization with this fragment confers protection against α-toxin and C. perfringens in a gas gangrene mouse model (Williamson & Titball, 1993). In chickens, immune responses against the C-terminal domain (PlcC) can provide partial protection against intestinal lesions following challenge with C. perfringens (Williamson & Titball, 1993; Jiang et al., 2015; Kulkarni et al., 2010; Zekarias, Mo & Curtiss, 2008).
Based on its association with gas gangrene, the chromosomally-encoded α-toxin was considered to be the major toxin associated with NE (Titball, Naylor & Basak, 1999; Williamson & Titball, 1993; Al-Sheikhly & Truscott, 1977; Fukata et al., 1988). The C-terminal domain of the α-toxin (PlcC) has been studied extensively as a vaccine against C. perfringens infection, delivered as a purified protein (Williamson & Titball, 1993; Stevens et al., 2004; Nagahama et al., 2013) or by live attenuated bacteria (Zekarias, Mo & Curtiss, 2008; Hoang et al., 2008). Currently the only commercially available vaccine for NE is composed of an α-toxoid derived from a C. perfringens type A strain (Crouch et al., 2010).
More recent studies have identified a β-like toxin, designated NetB toxin, linked to NE. It was originally identified in a C. perfringens type A strain isolated from an Australian outbreak of NE (Keyburn et al., 2008). Keyburn et al. (2008) showed that C. perfringens supernatants contain a factor that is toxic for chicken leghorn male hepatoma cells. The factor was present in supernatant from a plc knockout mutant, but not a netB knockout mutant of C. perfringens, implicating NetB as the toxin. Further, the C. perfringens netB mutant was attenuated for virulence in chickens, whereas a plc mutant of the same parent strain retained full virulence (Keyburn et al., 2006). Screens for netB in C. perfringens field isolates indicate that the presence of the netB gene is highly correlated with NE causing strains (Keyburn et al., 2008, 2010; Tolooe et al., 2011). Thus, NetB has emerged as a critical virulence factor. NetB functions by binding to cholesterol in membranes, forming heptameric pores (Savva et al., 2013; Yan et al., 2013). There are a number of single amino acid substitutions in the rim loop region of the protein, believed to interact with the host membrane, that significantly reduce its toxicity. These include Y191A, R200A, W257A and W262A (Savva et al., 2013) and S254L, R230Q and W287R (Yan et al., 2013).
NetB is also a protective antigen, providing partial protection against C. perfringens challenge, particularly in combination with other immunogenic components (Da Costa et al., 2013; Keyburn et al., 2013a, 2013b). In addition, immunization with non-toxic rim mutants, W262A (Da Costa et al., 2013) and S254L (Keyburn et al., 2013a), have been shown to generate protective immune responses in chickens. A study that examined serum antibody levels against C. perfringens α-toxin and NetB toxin in commercial birds from field outbreaks of NE showed that the levels of serum antibodies against both α-toxin and NetB toxin were significantly higher in apparently healthy chickens compared to birds with clinical signs of NE, suggesting that these antitoxin antibodies may play a role in protection (Lee et al., 2012). These results indicate a correlation between the presence of antitoxin antibodies in the serum and protective immunity against NE.
In a previous study, we used a live attenuated Salmonella vaccine to deliver PlcC, NetB, or both to chickens. We found that birds immunized against both toxins developed fewer severe lesions after C. perfringens challenge than birds immunized with either antigen alone (Jiang et al., 2015). Based on this finding, we have been developing approaches to combine the immunogenic components of each toxoid into a single protein, in order to develop a more convenient and protective vaccine for NE. In this study, we describe a novel plcC-netB fusion gene modified to encode the rim mutation W262A and codon-optimized for production in Nicotiana benthamiana. The gene was introduced into N. benthamiana via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of a geminiviral replicon transient expression system. The resulting fusion protein was purified and used to inject broiler chicks. Results indicate that the protein was highly immunogenic and elicited partial protection against challenge with a virulent strain of C. perfringens.
Materials and Methods
Expression vector construction
A PlcC-NetB fusion protein gene was designed using codons preferred for N. benthamiana (Geyer et al., 2010). Amino acid sequences were based on GenBank accessions AAP15462.1 for PlcC and ABW71134.1 for NetB. For targeting of nascent protein to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the barley alpha amylase signal peptide, followed by a 6His tag, was added to the N-terminus of PlcC. A linker peptide GGSGGSGGPSGGSGG was inserted between the PlcC and NetB sequences (Fig. 1). The fusion protein nucleotide sequences are in GenBank accession numbers MH883808 and MH883809. The gene was synthesized commercially with flanking XbaI and SacI sites. The 1,402 bp XbaI-SacI fragment was ligated with geminiviral vector pBYR2eK2M (Diamos, Rosenthal & Mason, 2016) to make pBYR2eK2M-6HplcCnetB. Removal of the 417 bp BamHI fragment containing the PlcC and linker sequences yielded the ER-targeted 6His-NetB construct pBYR2eK2M-6HnetB. To make the ER-targeted 6His-PlcC vector, we PCR end-tailored the PlcC sequence to introduce a stop codon and SacI site at its 3′ end, using the primer PlcC-Sac-R (Table S1), inserting the resulting product to yield pBYR2eK2M-6HplcC. To produce the cytosol-targeted proteins, the signal peptide was removed by introducing an XbaI site and start codon 5′ of the 6His sequence by PCR with primer 6H-Xba-F and using the ER-targeting constructs above as templates. The resulting XbaI-SacI fragments were ligated with plasmid pBYR2e3K2Mc-GFP (Diamos & Mason, 2018; Huang & Mason, 2004) digested XbaI-SacI, thus yielding the vectors pBYR2e3K2Mc-c6HplcCnetB, pBYR2e3K2Mc-c6HplcC, and pBYR2e3K2Mc-c6HnetB.
Agroinfiltration of plants for protein production
Expression vectors were inserted into A. tumefaciens EHA105 via electroporation. PCR and restriction digestion of the purified plasmids were used to confirm the resulting strains. Agrobacterium strains were grown overnight at 30 °C in YENB (7.5 g Yeast Extract and eight g Nutrient Broth for one L) + 50 mg/L kanamycin and 2.5 mg/L rifampicin. Bacteria were pelleted for 10 min at 5,000 g, then resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.5 and 10 mM MgSO4) with a final OD600 = 0.2. Suspensions were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves at 5- to 6-weeks of age using a syringe without needle via a small puncture (Huang & Mason, 2004). Infiltrated leaves were harvested at five days post infiltration (DPI).
Protein extraction, acid precipitation clarification, and filtration
Total protein was extracted from agroinfiltrated leaf samples using a 1:3 (w:v) ratio of extraction buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 200 mM sodium chloride, pH 8.1) at 4 °C. Leaf samples were homogenized for five to ten min until an even consistency was obtained using a two speed Conair™ Waring™ Laboratory Blender (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Homogenized leaf tissue was stirred at high speed for 10 min at 4 °C to improve protein solubility.
Acid precipitation was performed on crude extracts after this 10-min stirring period. Note that no filtration, sedimentation, or centrifugation was performed before acid precipitation. One M phosphoric acid was added to the crude extract as it spun until a pH of 4.4–4.6 was reached, as measured by a VWR Sb70 Symphony Ph Meter (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), Extract was stirred for 10 min at 4 °C. Two M Tris base was then added to the extract until pH reached 7.5–7.7, and the mixture was stirred for another ten min at 4 °C before being filtered through Miracloth and centrifuged at 17,000 g, 4 °C, for 30 min. The extract was then subjected to a second filtration through Miracloth resulting in a clarified extract, which was passed through a 0.45-micron filter for sterilization before metal affinity chromatography.
Three mL of Talon metal affinity resin (Clontech/Takara Bio, Mountain View, CA, USA) was spun down at 10,000 g, 4 °C, for 5 min and the supernatant removed from the bed. The resulting 1.5 mL resin bed was washed using 15 mL of extraction buffer (referred to below as wash buffer) and once again spun down at 10,000 g, 4 °C, for five min. Supernatant was discarded and the resin resuspended in 15 mL wash buffer before being added to a 20 mL column. A final wash of 20 mL was performed before the filtered extract was passed through the column. The resin was washed with 60 mL of wash buffer, and elution of bound proteins achieved with PBS + 150 mM imidazole, pH 7.4, collected in five 1 mL samples. Elution samples were dialyzed overnight in one L of sterile PBS using either a three mL or 10 mL 3,500 MWCO Slide-A-Lyzer G2 dialysis cassette (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following manufacturer’s instructions. Elution concentrations were determined both before and after dialysis by an A280 absorption using PBS and PBS + 150 mM imidazole, respectively, as blank solutions. Protein concentrations were confirmed by Coomassie staining of SDS-PAGE (below) analyzed with ImageJ (Schneider, Rasband & Eliceiri, 2012).
SDS-PAGE and Western blot
Crude extracts, clarified extracts, and eluted samples were mixed with SDS sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue) under reducing conditions (0.5 M DTT) and samples boiled for 10 min and separated on 4–15% polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gels were stained with Coomassie stain (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) or electroblot transferred to a PVDF membrane. PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% PBSTM (PBS with 0.05% Tween-20 and 5% nonfat dry milk) overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then washed with PBST before incubation with a 1:10,000 dilution of rabbit anti-PlcC or rabbit anti-NetB antibodies (Kulkarni et al., 2010) in 1% PBSTM for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing a second time the membranes were incubated with a 1:10,000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase conjugate in 1% PBSTM for 1 h at 37 °C. Bound antibody was detected with ECL reagent (Amersham Biosciences, San Francisco, CA, USA). Stripping of blots for reprobing was performed using a modified Abcam protocol. PVDF membrane was washed for 10 min in mild stripping buffer (for one L: 15 g glycine, one g SDS, 10 mL Tween20, pH 2.2) per Abcam’s recipe. PVDF membrane was then rinsed twice in 20 mL of PBS for 10 min followed by two 5-min rinse steps in 20 mL PBST. 5% PBSTM was used to block the membrane before reprobing.
Production of recombinant proteins in E. coli for immune assays
His-tagged recombinant PlcC (rPlcC) and NetB (rNetB) were cloned by PCR using primer sets Plc_pqe_f1/Plc_pqe_r2 and netB_pqe_f3/netB_pqe_r4, respectively (Table S1), using pYA5130 as the template. The resulting PCR fragments were digested with BamHI and SalI and ligated to BamHI/SalI-digested plasmid pQE30. Plasmids carrying the desired inserts were moved into E. coli strain M15(pREP4) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Protein synthesis was induced by the addition of IPTG according to the manufacturer’s instructions. rPlcC and rNetB were purified by passage over a TALON affinity column (Clontech Laboratories, Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The GST-NetB protein shown in Figs. 2 and 3 was purified as previously described (Jiang et al., 2015).
Chicken experiments
All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the Arizona State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol 16-1480R) and the Animal Welfare Act, in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH Publication No. 8023, revised 1978).
Groups of one-day-old Cornish × Rock broiler chickens were purchased from the Murray McMurray Hatchery (Webster City, IA, USA) and randomly sorted and placed in pens with pine shavings on the floor. Food and water was supplied ad libitum. For Experiments 1 and 2, groups of birds were immunized subcutaneously with 50 μg of fusion protein (Exp. 1, seven vaccinated and 11 control birds) or 100 μg of fusion protein (Exp. 2, 13 vaccinated and 10 control birds) with 50 μg of Quil-A adjuvant. Birds were given three immunizations at weekly intervals beginning at 8 days of age, with the final immunization at 22 days of age. Mock vaccinated controls were injected with adjuvant only. At 27 days of age, blood was taken for serum analysis. Three days later, when the birds were 30 days of age, birds were given an in-feed challenge with virulent C. perfringens for 5 days. The birds were scored for intestinal lesions the next day, at 35 days of age. For Experiment 3, birds were injected with 50 μg of PlcC-NetB at 7 days of age (22 vaccinated and 19 controls) and again at 12 days of age. Blood and tissues were taken from five birds/group for immunological analysis 10 days after the boost. Birds were challenged 2 weeks after the final boost, when the birds were 26 days of age.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
ELISAs were performed in triplicate as described Williamson & Titball (1993) to determine the IgY responses against his-tagged PlcC, his-tagged Fba, his-tagged NetB and S. Typhimurium lipopolysaccharide in chicken sera and IgA, IgY and IgM responses in intestinal washes. Biotinylated anti-chicken IgA (Alpha Diagnostic Intl. Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA), IgY (Southern Biotechnology, Birmingham, AL, USA) or IgM (Bioss, Woburn, MA, USA) antibodies diluted 1:10,000 were used to detect the various antibody isotypes.
Cellular proliferation assay
A proliferation assay was performed to evaluate cell-mediated immunity. Lymphocytes in the blood were harvested using the gentle swirl technique (Timbermont et al., 2011) and plated in quadruplicate, in a 96-well plate at 105 cells/well in RPMI-1640 without phenol red. Spleens were placed through a 70 μm cell strainer to obtain single cell suspensions. Red blood cells were lysed with Red Blood Cell Lysis solution (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Splenocytes were then washed, suspended in RPMI and plated at 106 cells/well. Each set of cells was incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 72 h with or without four μg/mL of either His-Fba, His-NetB, His-PlcC, or one μg/mL PMA. Cell proliferation was measured using the Vybrant®MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). Mean absorbance value of antigen stimulated wells divided by mean absorbance of non-stimulated control wells was used to calculate stimulation index.
Challenge with C. perfringens
Chickens were fed an antibiotic-free starter feed containing 21% protein for 20 days, at which time the feed was switched to a high protein (28% protein), wheat-based feed containing 36% fish meal and zinc at 400 ppm (customized by Reedy Fork Farm, Elon, NC, USA) to predispose the birds to NE (Coursodon et al., 2012; Shojadoost, Vince & Prescott, 2012). Birds were challenged with virulent C. perfringens strain CP4 (Thompson et al., 2006) in feed for five days as described (Shojadoost, Vince & Prescott, 2012) with some modifications. Feed was withdrawn on the day prior to challenge for 15 h. The following day, chickens were inoculated with 1.0 mL of an overnight culture of C. perfringens CP4 grown in cooked meat medium (CMM; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) by oral gavage. Immediately after gavage, infected feed was provided thereafter for five consecutive days. To prepare infected feed, C. perfringens was grown in CMM for 24 h at 37 °C, which then was inoculated into fluid thioglycollate medium (Difco) at a ratio of 0.3% (v/v) and incubated at 37 °C for 15 h (morning challenge) or 23 h (evening challenge). The C. perfringens culture was mixed with feed at a ratio of 1:1 (v/w). Infected feed was prepared freshly twice daily. All birds were euthanized and necropsied the day following the final challenge.
Lesion scoring
Protection against C. perfringens challenge was assessed on the basis of gross intestinal lesion scores at necropsy. On day 33, chickens were euthanized with CO2 and their small intestines (defined here as the section between the gizzard and Meckel’s diverticulum) were examined for visible gross lesions. Intestinal lesions were scored as follows: 0 = no gross lesions; 1 = thin or friable wall or diffuse superficial but removable fibrin; 2 = focal necrosis or ulceration, or non-removable fibrin deposit, 1–5 foci; 3 = focal necrosis or ulceration, or non-removable fibrin deposit, 6–15 foci; 4 = focal necrosis or ulceration, or non-removable fibrin deposit, 16 or more foci; 5 = patches of necrosis two to three cm long; 6 = diffuse necrosis typical of field cases (Shojadoost, Vince & Prescott, 2012). Birds that died during challenge were assigned a score of 6.
Statistical analysis
All statistics were carried out using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Antibody titers and lesion scores were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s posttest. The values were expressed as means ± SEM, and differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
Results
Construction of a PlcC-NetB fusion protein
We designed a fusion protein comprising an N-terminal 6His tag, PlcC, linker GGSGGSGGPSGGSGG, and NetB (Fig. 1). The long, flexible linker was used to facilitate correct folding of the PlcC and NetB domains, and to permit unencumbered access of B-cell receptors to the important immunogenic regions. PlcC contains the C-terminal receptor-binding domain of the alpha toxin (Guillouard et al., 1997). The NetB sequence contains a mutation W262A in the rim domain (Savva et al., 2013), which substantially attentuates the toxicity of the protein in cell culture assays. We noted that PlcC and NetB contain a total of five eukaryotic Asn-linked glycosylation sites (N-X-S/T), which could result in the addition of glycans to the Asn residue when the protein is targeted to the ER in plant cells. We constructed expression vectors to target proteins either to the ER (pBYR2eK2M-6HplcCnetB, -6HplcC and -6HnetB) or to the cytosol (pBYR2e3K2Mc-c6HplcCnetB -c6HplcC, and -c6HnetB). We expected the cytosol targeted proteins to be unglycosylated (designated PlcC-netB-NG), while the ER-targeted proteins may be glycosylated at any combination of or all of the five consensus N-X-S/T sites.
Production of PlcC-NetB and PlcC-NetB-NG fusion proteins in plants
Using the methods outlined herein two different fusion proteins were produced. One, targeted to the ER, was glycosylated (PlcC-NetB). The other, targeted to the cytoplasm, was non-glycosylated (PlcC-NetB-NG). Both fusion proteins were probed with rabbit anti-PlcC and rabbit anti-NetB antibodies which yielded the same results on a western blot (Fig. 2). PlcC-NetB also has incrementally increased band sizes above the initial band which aligns with the singular PlcC-NetB-NG band at approximately 49 kDa, the expected relative size of the fusion proteins (Fig. 2). Both NetB and PlcC expressed individually were also probed and appear at the expected sizes of 34 kDa and 15 kDa, respectively. While ER and cytoplasmic targeted NetB and PlcC were produced, only representative results are shown in Fig. 2. The yield of all PlcC-NetB constructs was estimated to be ∼2 mg/g leaf mass (∼20% of total soluble protein).
The process of purification for the PlcC-NetB protein is outlined in Fig. 3. A Coomassie-stained gel (Fig. 3A) shows a wild-type, uninfiltrated control followed by crude extract which had already been acid precipitated. Note that the crude extract has highly reduced plant protein contaminants, due to the acid precipitation that caused contaminating proteins to become insoluble while the fusion proteins remain soluble. The flow-through fraction contained bands of a similar profile to the crude extract on the Coomassie, while both washes showed no detectable protein. Three elution fractions contained bands at approximately 49 kDa. Anti-NetB antibodies (Fig. 3B) reacted primarily with the standard and elution 2, while elutions 1 and 3 had visible but less prominent bands. When probed with anti-PlcC antibodies (Fig. 3C), similar bands were present in every lane except the blank and NetB standard lanes. Elution fraction bands were as strong as those seen in the crude extract lane. Flow-through and wash fractions had lighter but detectable bands when probed with anti-PlcC. Bands that reacted with anti-PlcC antibodies were also seen at approximately 49 kDa.
Serum antibody responses to fusion protein antigens
We evaluated the serum antibody responses in birds immunized with PlcC-NetB and in control birds against the glycosylated fusion protein and against non-glycosylated recombinant rPlcC and rNetB produced in bacteria. In Experiments 1 and 2, the anti-PlcC-NetB titers were significantly higher than controls (Fig. 4). The titers against rPlcC and rNetB were also significantly elevated over controls. In Experiment 3, where birds were immunized twice, only the titers against the fusion protein were significantly higher than controls, although the serum titers against rNetB were elevated.
Cellular responses against PlcC-NetB in Experiment 3
Immunization with the fusion protein led to variable cellular responses. The rPlcC-NetB fusion protein elicited weak, but significant, cellular responses against rNetB and rPlcC-NetB in splenocytes (Fig. 5). No antigen-specific stimulation was detected in lymphocytes (data not shown).
Protection against C. perfringens challenge
Protection against challenge was assessed by scoring intestinal lesions using a six-point scoring system (Shojadoost, Vince & Prescott, 2012). Immunization with the rPlcC-NetB fusion protein resulted in a significant reduction in lesion scores in all three experiments (Fig. 6). Note that in Experiment 3, birds were challenged a week earlier than in Experiments 1 and 2. The younger age of the birds may have contributed to the higher lesion scores for some birds. Two of the non-immunized birds died during challenge. This was the only experiment in which any birds died following challenge.
Discussion
There is a growing need for methods to control NE that do not rely on antibiotics. Vaccination is a proven approach for controlling many poultry diseases and immunization with toxoid antigens is known to provide some protection against NE (Keyburn et al., 2013b; Cooper, Trinh & Songer, 2009). Immunizing with both α-toxoid and NetB toxoid provides better protection than when either antigen is used alone (Fernandes da Costa et al., 2016). Based on these observations, we designed a novel fusion protein combining toxoids of both toxins. The use of a plant expression system to produce this antigen has many advantages, including high yields, ease of stockpiling, rapid and easy scaling, quick response to emerging pathogens, and lack of any animal components in the final vaccine product.
The production of a PlcC-NetB fusion was readily accomplished in N. benthamiana using a geminiviral replicon transient expression system. A previously described Salmonella expression system was used to attempt production a fusion protein between PlcC and GST-NetB. However, production levels were low and the protein was rapidly degraded within the Salmonella cells (Jiang et al., 2015). In contrast, the plant expression system was shown to produce the PlcC-NetB fusion protein at a high capacity without degradation. High levels of protein production were due to our use of the geminiviral replicon transient expression system which has been recently optimized and has undergone improvement since the production of the PlcC-NetB fusion protein (Diamos, Rosenthal & Mason, 2016; Diamos & Mason, 2018; Rosenthal, Diamos & Mason, 2018). Acid precipitation (a process by which the PI of proteins, and their repulsive electromagnetic forces, equal zero and results in protein aggregation) proved to be an effective clarification step, over other purification methods, as both the PlcC-NetB and PlcC-NetB-NG fusion proteins proved to be acid stable (Wilken & Nikolov, 2012). This allowed for easy purification using metal affinity chromatography because many of the plant protein contaminants were removed from solution while the fusion proteins remained soluble. Metal affinity chromatography resulted in substantial purification although insubstantial contaminants could be seen upon concentration of elutions (Fig. 3A). However, contaminants were deemed not to be an issue for vaccination as they were in such low quantities.
Since a plant expression system was used, native plant glycosylation of the fusion protein PlcC-NetB occurred. An illustration of this can be seen in both Figs. 2 and 3 as there are progressively higher bands above the primary fusion protein band at 49 kDa only in the ER targeted variant. Glycosylation was a concern as an immune response could potentially be directed toward the glycans rather than the fusion protein itself (Maverakis et al., 2015; Schahs et al., 2007). This is the reason the PlcC-NetB-NG fusion was pursued. PlcC-NetB-NG proved to be troublesome as it precipitated after dialysis, a phenomenon that has been observed for rubisco, the most abundant plant protein contaminant. Insolubility of PlcC-NetB-NG may also be caused by stripping of metal ions from both PlcC and NetB that are normally present. According to the crystal structure of PlcC it likely binds calcium ions, however, due to difficulty in forming a crystal structure calcium was substituted for cadmium (Naylor et al., 1998). The crystal structure of native NetB toxin has been shown to bind magnesium (Yan et al., 2013). These metal ions could be removed during the final dialysis step, which might affect protein structure and solubility. This may indicate that the glycoforms play a role in protein stability and solubility as PlcC-NetB did not have solubility issues under the same buffer, concentration, and purification conditions. Results indicate that, even with plant native glycosylation, the PlcC-NetB fusion promoted an anti-toxoid response. We speculate that the glycoforms could have possibly had an adjuvant effect as antibody titers for the fusion protein were greater than E. coli produced PlcC and NetB delivered simultaneously (Bosch & Schots, 2010). This may also be due to the fusion of both proteins as well. In any case, production of the PlcC-NetB fusion protein was found to be efficient on a small scale which, due to the nature of plant expression systems, is readily scalable. Moreover, the fusion protein vaccine was found to be effective when injected into broiler birds as is discussed below.
In Experiments 1 and 2, 3 weekly injections with the fusion protein generated strong serum IgY responses against both toxin components (Fig. 4). Vaccinated birds had geometric mean titers of around 2,000 against recombinant NetB and PlcC proteins purified from E. coli (Fig. 4). Titers against the PlcC-NetB fusion protein produced in plants were around 8,000 in immunized birds. The difference in titers between single proteins and the fusion protein is speculated to be due to enhanced immune response to the fused protein, since PlcC and NetB are in close proximity during infection, or responses against the carbohydrate moieties on the glycosylated protein leading to an enhanced immune response.
In Experiment 3 birds were immunized at 7 and 12 days of age which lead to a reduced serum response. The chicken adaptive immune system does not fully mature until approximately 2 weeks post-hatch, although humoral responses can be detected after immunization with a protein antigen at 12 days of age (Mast & Goddeeris, 1999). In this regard, an adjuvanted NetB toxoid was shown to be ineffective when injected into day-of-hatch chicks (Mot et al., 2013). Thus, it is possible that immunizing the birds at 7 days of age did not serve as a priming dose, such that the immunization at 12 days of age was effectively the prime. Previous work showed that immunization at 12 days of age, but not 7 days of age, can be boosted by injection at 29 days of age (Mast & Goddeeris, 1999). Although we did not perform a vaccine boost, we infer that the birds were adequately primed since, despite the low serum antibody responses, they were protected against challenge (Fig. 5C).
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that this novel toxoid antigen produced in plants is immunogenic and protective in chickens. However, we acknowledge that a more practical immunization approach is needed in order to have a positive impact on the broiler industry. We envision several options. Immunization of parent stock is likely to induce maternal antibodies to protect chicks during the first few weeks of life. This approach, using an α-toxoid antigen, provided partial protection against NE during the first week of life (Crouch et al., 2010). Alternatively, protein antigens can be successfully delivered via in ovo injection with an adequate adjuvant. Delivery of the fusion protein via cornmeal could also be a cheap and effective mass delivery method for vaccine produced in corn seeds. The effectiveness of these approaches will be assessed in future studies.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Luis Armando Vazquez, Donovan Leigh, Penelope Roach, Melody Yeh, Jack Crawford, Matt Contursi, Mary Pardhe, Sara Aman, and Artemio Chaves for their technical assistance. We thank Dustin McAndrew, Randall Dalbey, Jacquelyn Kilbourne, Larisa Gilley and the rest of the ASU animal care staff for expert care of our research animals and procedural assistance.
Funding Statement
This project was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2016-67016-24947 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and startup funds from ASU to Ken Roland, and by support from the Biodesign Institute at ASU for Hugh Mason. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
K. Roland, A. Diamos, and H.S. Mason are inventors on patents regarding the necrotic enteritis vaccine described herein:
US 62/528,696 JULY 5, 2017.
PCT PCT/US2018/040632 JULY 2, 2018.
Otherwise, the authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Joseph G.L. Hunter conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.
Shyra Wilde performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables.
Amanda M. Tafoya performed the experiments.
Jamie Horsman performed the experiments.
Miranda Yousif performed the experiments.
Andrew G. Diamos conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.
Kenneth L. Roland conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Hugh S. Mason conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Animal Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
Arizona State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved this research (16-1480R).
Patent Disclosures
The following patent dependencies were disclosed by the authors:
PCT/US18/40632, VACCINE FOR PREVENTION OF NECROTIC ENTERITIS IN POULTRY
US 13/060,414, A DNA replicon system for high-level rapid production of vaccines and monoclonal antibody therapeutics in plants
DNA Deposition
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Original Western blot images for Figs. 2 and 3 are available in the Supplemental Materials.
References
- Al-Sheikhly & Truscott (1977).Al-Sheikhly F, Truscott RB. The interaction of Clostridium perfringens and its toxins in the production of necrotic enteritis of chickens. Avian Diseases. 1977;21(2):256–263. doi: 10.2307/1589345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bosch & Schots (2010).Bosch D, Schots A. Plant glycans: friend or foe in vaccine development? Expert Review of Vaccines. 2010;9(8):835–842. doi: 10.1586/erv.10.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butaye, Devriese & Haesebrouck (2003).Butaye P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2003;16(2):175–188. doi: 10.1128/cmr.16.2.175-188.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, Songer & Uzal (2013).Cooper KK, Songer JG, Uzal FA. Diagnosing clostridial enteric disease in poultry. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2013;25(3):314–327. doi: 10.1177/1040638713483468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper & Songer (2010).Cooper KK, Songer JG. Virulence of Clostridium perfringens in an experimental model of poultry necrotic enteritis. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;142(3–4):323–328. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, Trinh & Songer (2009).Cooper KK, Trinh HT, Songer JG. Immunization with recombinant alpha toxin partially protects broiler chicks against experimental challenge with Clostridium perfringens. Veterinary Microbiology. 2009;133(1–2):92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coursodon et al. (2012).Coursodon CF, Glock RD, Moore KL, Cooper KK, Songer JG. TpeL-producing strains of Clostridium perfringens type A are highly virulent for broiler chicks. Anaerobe. 2012;18(1):117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crouch et al. (2010).Crouch CF, Withanage GSK, De Haas V, Etoré F, Francis MJ. Safety and efficacy of a maternal vaccine for the passive protection of broiler chicks against necrotic enteritis. Avian Pathology. 2010;39(6):489–497. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2010.517513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Da Costa et al. (2013).Da Costa SPF, Mot D, Bokori-Brown M, Savva CG, Basak AK, Van Immerseel F, Titball RW. Protection against avian necrotic enteritis after immunisation with NetB genetic or formaldehyde toxoids. Vaccine. 2013;31(37):4003–4008. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diamos & Mason (2018).Diamos AG, Mason HS. Chimeric 3′ flanking regions strongly enhance gene expression in plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2018;16(12):1971–1982. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diamos, Rosenthal & Mason (2016).Diamos AG, Rosenthal SH, Mason HS. 5′ and 3′ Untranslated Regions Strongly Enhance Performance of Geminiviral Replicons in Nicotiana benthamiana Leaves. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:200. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes da Costa et al. (2016).Fernandes da Costa SP, Mot D, Geeraerts S, Bokori-Brown M, Van Immerseel F, Titball RW. Variable protection against experimental broiler necrotic enteritis after immunization with the C-terminal fragment of Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin and a non-toxic NetB variant. Avian Pathology. 2016;45(3):381–388. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2015.1129663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukata et al. (1988).Fukata T, Hadate Y, Baba E, Uemura T, Arakawa A. Influence of Clostridium perfringens and its toxin in germ-free chickens. Research in Veterinary Science. 1988;44(1):68–70. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(88)90015-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geyer et al. (2010).Geyer BC, Kannan L, Cherni I, Woods RR, Soreq H, Mor TS. Transgenic plants as a source for the bioscavenging enzyme, human butyrylcholinesterase. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2010;8(8):873–886. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guillouard et al. (1997).Guillouard I, Alzari PM, Saliou B, Cole ST. The carboxy-terminal C2-like domain of the alpha-toxin from Clostridium perfringens mediates calcium-dependent membrane recognition. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;26(5):867–876. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6161993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guillouard, Garnier & Cole (1996).Guillouard I, Garnier T, Cole ST. Use of site-directed mutagenesis to probe structure-function relationships of alpha-toxin from Clostridium perfringens. Infection and Immunity. 1996;64(7):2440–2444. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.7.2440-2444.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoang et al. (2008).Hoang TH, Hong HA, Clark GC, Titball RW, Cutting SM. Recombinant Bacillus subtilis expressing the Clostridium perfringens alpha toxoid is a candidate orally delivered vaccine against necrotic enteritis. Infection and Immunity. 2008;76(11):5257–5265. doi: 10.1128/iai.00686-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang & Mason (2004).Huang Z, Mason HS. Conformational analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen fusions in an Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression system. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2004;2(3):241–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang et al. (2015).Jiang Y, Mo H, Willingham C, Wang S, Park JY, Kong W, Roland KL, Curtiss R., 3rd Protection against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens by regulated delayed lysis Salmonella vaccines. Avian Diseases. 2015;59(4):475–485. doi: 10.1637/11094-041715-Reg. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keyburn et al. (2008).Keyburn AL, Boyce JD, Vaz P, Bannam TL, Ford ME, Parker D, Di Rubbo A, Rood JI, Moore RJ. NetB, a new toxin that is associated with avian necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringens. PLOS Pathogens. 2008;4(2):e26. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keyburn et al. (2013a).Keyburn AL, Portela RW, Ford ME, Bannam TL, Yan XX, Rood JI, Moore RJ. Maternal immunization with vaccines containing recombinant NetB toxin partially protects progeny chickens from necrotic enteritis. Veterinary Research. 2013a;44(1):108. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keyburn et al. (2013b).Keyburn AL, Portela RW, Sproat K, Ford ME, Bannam TL, Yan X, Rood JI, Moore RJ. Vaccination with recombinant NetB toxin partially protects broiler chickens from necrotic enteritis. Veterinary Research. 2013b;44(1):54. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keyburn et al. (2006).Keyburn AL, Sheedy SA, Ford ME, Williamson MM, Awad MM, Rood JI, Moore RJ. Alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens is not an essential virulence factor in necrotic enteritis in chickens. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74(11):6496–6500. doi: 10.1128/iai.00806-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keyburn et al. (2010).Keyburn AL, Yan X-X, Bannam TL, Van Immerseel F, Rood JI, Moore RJ. Association between avian necrotic enteritis and Clostridium perfringens strains expressing NetB toxin. Veterinary Research. 2010;41(2):21. doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knarreborg et al. (2002).Knarreborg A, Simon MA, Engberg RM, Jensen BB, Tannock GW. Effects of dietary fat source and subtherapeutic levels of antibiotic on the bacterial community in the ileum of broiler chickens at various ages. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68(12):5918–5924. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.12.5918-5924.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulkarni et al. (2010).Kulkarni RR, Parreira VR, Jiang Y-F, Prescott JF. A live oral recombinant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine expressing Clostridium perfringens antigens confers protection against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2010;17(2):205–214. doi: 10.1128/cvi.00406-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee et al. (2012).Lee KW, Lillehoj HS, Park MS, Jang SI, Ritter GD, Hong YH, Jeong W, Jeoung HY, An DJ, Lillehoj EP. Clostridium perfringens α-toxin and NetB toxin antibodies and their possible role in protection against necrotic enteritis and gangrenous dermatitis in broiler chickens. Avian Diseases. 2012;56(1):230–233. doi: 10.1637/9847-070711-resnote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mast & Goddeeris (1999).Mast J, Goddeeris BM. Development of immunocompetence of broiler chickens. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 1999;70(3–4):245–256. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(99)00079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maverakis et al. (2015).Maverakis E, Kim K, Shimoda M, Eric Gershwin M, Patel F, Wilken R, Raychaudhuri S, Renee Ruhaak L, Lebrilla CB. Glycans in the immune system and the altered glycan theory of autoimmunity: a critical review. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2015;57:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDevitt et al. (2006).McDevitt RM, Brooker JD, Acamovic T, Sparks NHC. Necrotic enteritis; a continuing challenge for the poultry industry. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2006;62(2):221–247. doi: 10.1079/wps200593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McReynolds et al. (2004).McReynolds JL, Byrd JA, Anderson RC, Moore RW, Edrington TS, Genovese KJ, Poole TL, Kubena LF, Nisbet DJ. Evaluation of immunosuppressants and dietary mechanisms in an experimental disease model for necrotic enteritis. Poultry Science. 2004;83(12):1948–1952. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.12.1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mot et al. (2013).Mot D, Timbermont L, Delezie E, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F. Day-of-hatch vaccination is not protective against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Avian Pathology. 2013;42(2):179–184. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2013.778955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagahama et al. (2013).Nagahama M, Oda M, Kobayashi K, Ochi S, Takagishi T, Shibutani M, Sakurai J. A recombinant carboxy-terminal domain of alpha-toxin protects mice against Clostridium perfringens. Microbiology and Immunology. 2013;57(5):340–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.12036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naylor et al. (1998).Naylor CE, Eaton JT, Howells A, Justin N, Moss DS, Titball RW, Basak AK. Structure of the key toxin in gas gangrene. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 1998;5(8):738–746. doi: 10.1038/1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prescott et al. (2016).Prescott JF, Parreira VR, Gohari IM, Lepp D, Gong J. The pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens: what we know and what we need to know: a review. Avian Pathology. 2016;45(3):288–294. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2016.1139688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenthal, Diamos & Mason (2018).Rosenthal SH, Diamos AG, Mason HS. An intronless form of the tobacco extensin gene terminator strongly enhances transient gene expression in plant leaves. Plant Molecular Biology. 2018;96(4–5):429–443. doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-0708-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savva et al. (2013).Savva CG, Fernandes da Costa SP, Bokori-Brown M, Naylor CE, Cole AR, Moss DS, Titball RW, Basak AK. Molecular architecture and functional analysis of NetB, a pore-forming toxin from Clostridium perfringens. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288(5):3512–3522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m112.430223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schahs et al. (2007).Schahs M, Strasser R, Stadlmann J, Kunert R, Rademacher T, Steinkellner H. Production of a monoclonal antibody in plants with a humanized N-glycosylation pattern. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2007;5(5):657–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, Rasband & Eliceiri (2012).Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shivaramaiah et al. (2011).Shivaramaiah S, Wolfenden RE, Barta JR, Morgan MJ, Wolfenden AD, Hargis BM, Téllez G. The role of an early Salmonella Typhimurium infection as a predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis in a laboratory challenge model. Avian Diseases. 2011;55(2):319–323. doi: 10.1637/9604-112910-resnote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shojadoost, Vince & Prescott (2012).Shojadoost B, Vince AR, Prescott JF. The successful experimental induction of necrotic enteritis in chickens by Clostridium perfringens: a critical review. Veterinary Research. 2012;43(1):74. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-43-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanley et al. (2014).Stanley D, Wu S-B, Rodgers N, Swick RA, Moore RJ. Differential responses of cecal microbiota to fishmeal, Eimeria and Clostridium perfringens in a necrotic enteritis challenge model in chickens. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens et al. (2004).Stevens DL, Titball RW, Jepson M, Bayer CR, Hayes‐Schroer SM, Bryant AE. Immunization with the C-Domain of α‐toxin prevents lethal infection, localizes tissue injury, and promotes host response to challenge with Clostridium perfringens. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;190(4):767–773. doi: 10.1086/422691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson et al. (2006).Thompson DR, Parreira VR, Kulkarni RR, Prescott JF. Live attenuated vaccine-based control of necrotic enteritis of broiler chickens. Veterinary Microbiology. 2006;113(1–2):25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timbermont et al. (2011).Timbermont L, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F. Necrotic enteritis in broilers: an updated review on the pathogenesis. Avian Pathology. 2011;40(4):341–347. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2011.590967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Titball, Fearn & Williamson (1993).Titball RW, Fearn AM, Williamson ED. Biochemical and immunological properties of the C-terminal domain of the alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1993;110(1):45–50. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(93)90240-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Titball et al. (1991).Titball RW, Leslie DL, Kelly DC, Harvey S. Hemolytic and sphingomyelinase activities of Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin are dependent on a domain homologous to that of an enzyme from the human arachidonic acid pathway. Infection and Immunity. 1991;59(5):1872–1874. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.5.1872-1874.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Titball, Naylor & Basak (1999).Titball RV, Naylor CE, Basak AK. The Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin. Anaerobe. 1999;5(2):51–64. doi: 10.1006/anae.1999.0191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolooe et al. (2011).Tolooe A, Shojadoost B, Peighambar SM, Tamaddon Y. Prevalence of netB Gene among Clostridium perfringens isolates obtained from healthy and diseased chickens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2011;10(1):106–110. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2011.106.110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van Der Sluis (2000).Van Der Sluis W. Clostridial enteritis is an often underestimated problem. World Poultry. 2000;16:42–43. [Google Scholar]
- Van Immerseel et al. (2004).Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Pasmans F, Huyghebaert G, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health. Avian Pathology. 2004;33(6):537–549. doi: 10.1080/03079450400013162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilken & Nikolov (2012).Wilken LR, Nikolov ZL. Recovery and purification of plant-made recombinant proteins. Biotechnology Advances. 2012;30(2):419–433. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williamson & Titball (1993).Williamson ED, Titball RW. A genetically engineered vaccine against the alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens protects mice against experimental gas gangrene. Vaccine. 1993;11(12):1253–1258. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(93)90051-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan et al. (2013).Yan XX, Porter CJ, Hardy SP, Steer D, Ian Smith A, Quinsey NS, Hughes V, Cheung JK, Keyburn AL, Kaldhusdal M, Moore RJ, Bannam TL, Whisstock JC, Rood JI. Structural and functional analysis of the pore-forming toxin NetB from Clostridium perfringens. MBio. 2013;4(1):e00019-13. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00019-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zekarias, Mo & Curtiss (2008).Zekarias B, Mo H, Curtiss R., III Recombinant attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing the carboxy-terminal domain of alpha toxin from Clostridium perfringens induces protective responses against necrotic enteritis in chickens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2008;15(5):805–816. doi: 10.1128/cvi.00457-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Original Western blot images for Figs. 2 and 3 are available in the Supplemental Materials.