Skip to main content
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal logoLink to Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
. 2019 Mar 28;18(4):e440–e446. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.04.003

Individual Radiosensitivity Assessment of the Families of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Patients by G2-Checkpoint Abrogation

Asghar Aghamohammadi 1,, Seyed M Akrami 2,, Marjan Yaghmaie 3, Nima Rezaei 1, Gholamreza Azizi 4, Mehdi Yaseri 5, Hassan Nosrati 6,*, Majid Zaki-Dizaji 1
PMCID: PMC6443281  PMID: 30988961

Abstract

Objectives

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is an autosomal recessive multisystem disorder characterised by cerebellar degeneration, telangiectasia, radiation sensitivity, immunodeficiency, oxidative stress and cancer susceptibility. Epidemiological research has shown that carriers of the heterozygous ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene mutation are radiosensitive to ionising irradiation and have a higher risk of cancers, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. However, there is currently no fast and reliable laboratory-based method to detect heterozygous ATM carriers for family screening and planning purposes. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the ability of a modified G2-assay to identify heterozygous ATM carriers in the families of A-T patients.

Methods

This study took place at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, between February and December 2017 and included 16 A-T patients, their parents (obligate heterozygotes) and 30 healthy controls. All of the subjects underwent individual radiosensitivity (IRS) assessment using a modified caffeine-treated G2-assay with G2-checkpoint abrogation.

Results

The mean IRS of the obligate ATM heterozygotes was significantly higher than the healthy controls (55.13% ± 5.84% versus 39.03% ± 6.95%; P <0.001), but significantly lower than the A-T patients (55.13% ± 5.84% versus 87.39% ± 8.29%; P = 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the G2-assay values indicated high sensitivity and specificity, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.00).

Conclusion

The modified G2-assay demonstrated adequate precision and relatively high sensitivity and specificity in detecting heterozygous ATM carriers.

Keywords: Ataxia-Telangiectasia, Chromosome Breakage, Genetic Carrier Screening, Heterozygote, Radiation Sensitivity, Sensitivity and Specificity


Advances in Knowledge

  • - This study demonstrates the relatively high sensitivity and specificity of a modified caffeine-treated G2-assay in the detection of heterozygous carriers of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene mutation.

Application to Patient Care

  • - A modified caffeine-treated G2-assay is proposed as an alternative method for identifying heterozygous ATM carriers within the families of patients with ataxia-telangiectasia for family screening and planning purposes.

Ataxia-telangiectasia (a-t) is a rare autosomal recessive pleiotropic syndrome characterised by cerebellar ataxia, oculocutaneous telangiectasia, chromosomal instability, radiosensitivity, variable immunodeficiency, oxidative stress and a high risk of malignancy.1,2 Worldwide, only one in 40,000–100,000 neonates is homozygous for the A-T mutated (ATM) gene mutation; however, 0.5–2% of the general population are heterozygous carriers.1 Although heterozygous ATM carriers are commonly asymptomatic, they have a higher sensitivity to ionising radiation (IR) and a higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases and cancers.2,3 However, the exact mechanism and the responsible mutations for this increased susceptibility to certain cancers are not yet understood.

The ATM gene codes for a ubiquitous serine/threonine protein kinase that has been implicated in the maintenance of genomic stability.1 Over 480 different mutations—which occur across the full-length transcript without any hotspots—have been described in A-T patients.3 In addition, the ATM gene has many polymorphisms/missense DNA changes that must be distinguished from deleterious mutations.1 Early identification of the syndrome is useful for establishing prognosis and initiating genetic counselling for the family members of affected patients.4 However, the diagnosis can be problematic and is usually based on clinical symptoms as well as high levels of serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), acquired translocations between chromosomes 7 and 14 in the blood karyotype and reduced cell sensitivity to IR or the absence of the ATM protein.5

Despite advancement in functional and sequencing-based assays, no reliable low-cost test is yet available for identifying A-T patients and heterozygous ATM carriers.6 However, certain techniques developed to evaluate radio-sensitivity in A-T patients may constitute methods of differentiating heterozygous ATM carriers, such as G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assays, comet assays, fluorescence in situ hybridisation, messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA)/microRNA expression profiling of the ATM gene and gamma-H2AX and PSMC1 gene assays.616 However, these findings need to be confirmed among additional individuals carrying different ATM gene mutations.

The G2-checkpoint eases chromosome damage repair, probably by inhibiting the deleterious progression of cells through the cell cycle.17 Caffeine has been reported to increase radiosensitivity and abrogate radiation-induced cell cycle inhibition/delays by inhibiting the G2/M checkpoint, either with or without inactivating the ATM and A-T Rad3-related genes.18 Terzoudi et al. reported that caffeine treatment increased G2-assay sensitivity and reduced interlaboratory and intra-experimental variations.19 Similarly, Pantelias et al. proposed a standardised caffeine-treated G2-assay for predicting individual radiosensitivity (IRS).20 This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a modified caffeine-treated G2 breakage assay to identify heterozygous ATM carriers in the families of A-T patients.

Methods

This study was conducted at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from February to December 2017. A total of 78 individuals were included in the study, comprising 16 A-T patients, their 32 parents (obligate heterozygotes) and 30 healthy controls. The A-T patients were recruited from previously diagnosed cases or from those who were being followed-up at the Children’s Medical Center Hospital in Tehran. In all cases, the A-T diagnosis was based on evidence of disabling mutations on both alleles of the ATM gene and either increased radiation-induced chromosomal breakage in cultured cells or progressive cerebellar ataxia.5 Additional supportive tests, including specific serum AFP and immunoglobulin measurements, were also carried out. The control subjects were recruited from members of staff at the Children’s Medical Center Hospital and the Department of Medical Genetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Only individuals who were unrelated to A-T patients and had no family history of malignancy, atherosclerosis or type 2 diabetes were included as controls. The controls were approximately matched for age and gender with the heterozygous ATM carriers.

A total of 2 mL of peripheral blood was collected from each subject. A modified G2 breakage assay was performed based on previously published protocols.20 Briefly, 1 mL of whole blood was added to 10 mL of Gibco Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 2% phytohaemagglutinin, 1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The mixture was then incubated for 72 hours at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% carbon dioxide. Each sample was cultured in two flasks to assess spontaneous breakage and radiation-induced breakage. After 72 hours, gamma irradiation was performed using a Theratron® 780E teletherapy machine (MDS Nordion Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) at a dose rate of 0.9 Grays (Gy) per minute for 1.12 minutes at room temperature. After irradiation, each culture was divided into two flasks, of which one was treated with 4 mM of caffeine, before being incubated for 20 minutes at 37 °C. The cultures were then treated with demecolcine for 75 minutes. After incubation, the cells were harvested, prepared on slides and stained with Giemsa according to conventional cytogenetic techniques.21

Stained slides were coded and underwent blinded analysis by two separate researchers. Only well-spread metaphases with 44–47 chromosomes each were evaluated. For each sample, a total of 50 metaphases were examined for chromatid aberrations (i.e. breaks and gaps). Moreover, the level of spontaneous chromatid anomalies was evaluated in non-irradiated lymphocyte cultures and the resultant number was subtracted from the radiation-induced G2 yield of chromatid breaks. A chromatid gap was defined as an interruption in the staining of a chromatid greater than the width of the chromatid, without displacement of the segment distal to the lesion.22 A lesion was considered to be a chromatid break if there was distinct dislocation and misalignment of the broken segment [Figure 1].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Diagrams showing chromatid breaks and gaps (arrows) in a peripheral blood lymphocyte at metaphase stage from a heterozygous carrier of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated gene mutation after 0.9 Grays per minute of gamma irradiation using (A) conventional and (B) modified G2-assays.

For each individual, two different yields of chromatid aberrations were calculated. The first yield was similar to that of a conventional G2-assay and the second was the maximum yield of chromatid breaks achieved when the G2-checkpoint was abolished by caffeine. The

I R SIRS=(1-G2caf-G2G2caf)×100 [Equation 1]

was calculated as below [Equation 1]:

where G2caf is the yield when the G2-checkpoint is abolished by caffeine and G2 is the conventional G2-assay yield. For samples which deviated by more or less than 5% from formerly published cut-off values, an additional 50 metaphases were analysed.20 The frequency of exchanges and rings was not included in the calculation of aberration yields. The inter-day precision of the G2-assay was determined by analysing six samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from one healthy donor on six different days. The precision of the test was assessed only at between-run levels.

Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism software, Version 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). Statistical differences between groups were determined using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparison post-hoc tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to assess the relevant sensitivity and specificity of the G2-assay values. A significance level of P ≤0.050 was used throughout the experiments. The inter-day precision was presented as a coefficient of variation.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (#26489-154-02-93). All subjects gave informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Results

The male-to-female ratios of the A-T patients and controls were 0.9 and 1.4, respectively. The mean ages of the A-T patients, heterozygous ATM carriers and healthy controls were 10, 37 and 32 years old, respectively (ranges: 4–22, 26–55 and 19–46 years, respectively). The clinical and demographic data of the A-T patients are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data of ataxia-telangiectasia patients (N = 16)

Patient Presence of consanguinity Age in years/gender Age at ataxia onset in years Age at telangiectasia onset in years AFP level in mg/dL IgG level in mg/dL IgA level in mg/dL IgM level in mg/dL IgE level in IU/mL
1 Yes 14/M 5 6 103 960 0 195 40
2 Yes 9/M 2 3 161 670 7 225 7
3 Yes 7/M 1 1 380 809 173 111 10
4 Yes 4/F 2 3 90 982 16 100 1
5 Yes 16/F 1 2 75 <5 4 284 14
6 No 11/M 2 5 406 1,200 145 200 NA
7 No 11/F 2 8 104 5 1 208 <1
8 No 9/M 1 5 150 613 <5 60 <1
9 Yes 10/F 7 9 319 687 595 149 5
10 No 4/M 1 1 30 468 7 89 <1
11 No 10/F 2 4 520 NA NA NA NA
12 Yes 22/M NA NA 666 1,185 249 112 NA
13 Yes 10/M 3 2 619 826 108 43 <1
14 Yes 10/F 1 1 155 <1 <1 430 <1
15 Yes 7/F 2 7 87 143 9 2,257 <1
16 Yes 8/F 1 8 157 643 1 71 <1

AFP = α-fetoprotein; Ig = immunoglobulin; M = male; F = female; NA = not available.

There was a significant increase in IRS across all three groups (P <0.001). The mean frequency of induced chromatid aberrations in cells from heterozygous ATM carriers were significantly higher than in those from healthy controls (55.13% ± 5.84% versus 39.03% ± 6.95%; P <0.001) and significantly lower than in A-T patients (55.13% ± 5.84% versus 87.39% ± 8.29%; P = 0.001) [Figure 2]. An ROC curve analysis of G2-assay values demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for the identification of heterozygous ATM carriers versus controls, with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.00) [Figure 3 and Table 2]. The overall inter-day coefficient of variation of the assay was 4.28% (mean: 45.84% ± 1.96%).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Box plot of the individual radiosensitivity percentages of healthy controls, heterozygous ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) mutated gene carriers and A-T patients after 0.9 Grays per minute of gamma irradiation (N = 78).

IRS = individual radiosensitivity; ATM = ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) mutated.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of G2-assay data for (A) healthy controls versus heterozygous ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene carriers, (B) healthy controls versus ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) patients and (C) heterozygous ATM carriers versus A-T patients (N = 78).

Table 2.

Diagnostic potential of a modified G2-assay in the differentiation of healthy controls, heterozygous ataxia-telangiectasia mutated gene carriers and ataxia-telangiectasia patients (N = 78)

Healthy controls versus heterozygous ATM gene carriers Healthy controls versus A-T patients Heterozygous ATM gene carriers versus A-T patients
AUC (95% CI) 0.97 (0.95–1.00) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 100 (89–100) 100 (80–100) 100 (79–100)
Specificity, % (95% CI) 90 (73–98) 100 (88–100) 100 (89–100)
Cut-off value, % 45 60 70

A-T = ataxia-telangiectasia; ATM = A-T mutated; AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval.

Overall, the G2-checkpoint efficiency was easily discriminated in A-T patients; however, there was an overlap of chromatid aberration frequencies observed between controls and heterozygous ATM carriers. Aberrations in non-irradiated lymphocytes were not noticeable in any of the three groups.

Discussion

Along with chromosomal instability, cells with ATM gene mutations display extreme radiosensitivity both in vivo and in vitro.3 These phenotypes suggest that the ATM gene plays a critical role in the DNA repair system. Furthermore, as serine/threonine kinase acts as a sensor of oxidative stress in normal cells, the loss of this protein in individuals with ATM mutations disturbs the redox balance and increases levels of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress, contributing to increased radiosensitivity.23,24 However, the exact role of the ATM gene in these systems and the tissue specificity of such defects remains unknown. The ATM gene coordinates cell cycle checkpoint signalling via the phosphorylation of different substrates, including p53, checkpoint kinase 2, structural maintenance of chromosomes 1 (SMC1), activating transcription factor 2 and nibrin.1 A lack of serine/threonine kinase leads to the loss of these checkpoints and, therefore, the potentially deleterious progression of cells through the cell cycle.

The screening and identification of heterozygous carriers of ATM-related haploinsufficiencies and allelic variants is an important public health goal due to their high frequency in the population and increased susceptibility to cancer, diabetes and atherosclerosis.1,2 The current study evaluated the IRS of A-T patients, heterozygous ATM carriers and healthy controls by assessing the frequency of radiation-induced chromatid aberrations during the G2/M transition stage in stimulated blood lymphocytes using a modified caffeine-treated G2-assay with G2-checkpoint abrogation. A significantly higher frequency of chromatid breaks and gaps was observed in the cells of A-T patients compared to those of the heterozygous ATM carriers. Similarly, there was a significantly higher frequency of chromatid breaks and gaps among the cells of heterozygous ATM carriers compared to those of the healthy controls. Unfortunately, the range of these aberrations overlapped to some extent between the latter two groups, thus precluding the absolute detection of heterozygous ATM carriers. Nevertheless, this method—which required only 2 mL of peripheral blood from the subjects—showed acceptable inter-day variation and relatively high sensitivity and specificity for the identification of heterozygous ATM carriers.

Several previous studies have attempted to distinguish heterozygous ATM carriers from normal controls using G2-assays.7,8,25 Tchirkov et al. detected 13 heterozygous ATM carriers without any overlap of results with those of normal donors.10 However, these findings were not consistent with those of other studies.22,2628 This may be due to variations in the number of subjects, type of cells under consideration, nature of the ATM mutation, technical procedures, treatment dose and dose rate, number of analysed metaphases, time interval between irradiation and fixation and the type of analysed aberration. Leonard et al. distinguished obligate heterozygotes from controls utilising lymphoblast cell lines which had been treated with camptothecin; however, this method requires further study using peripheral blood samples from a larger cohort.11 Likewise, Terzoudi et al. introduced a new approach to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint abrogation for assessing IRS using caffeine treatment; this method demonstrated better discrimination and minimal intra-individual and inter-laboratory variations compared to the conventional G2-assay.19,20

Claes et al. reported the use of a modified S-G2 micronucleus assay in which caffeine treatment formed a complementary assay for the identification of atypical A-T patients and heterozygous ATM carriers.29 Prodosmo et al. proposed a new, fast and cost-effective test to determine ATM zygosity based on p53 centrosomal localisation visualised by immunofluorescence staining.30 Porcedda et al. identified heterozygotes using a two-tier analysis of histone H2AX phosphorylation, H2AX phosphorylation levels and residual gamma-H2AX foci.16 In addition, A-T patients and heterozygous ATM carriers have been identified by evaluating serine/threonine kinase-dependent phosphorylation of SMC1 following DNA damage; however, this assay could not discriminate between carriers and controls via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.31 A more recent, quick, labour-intensive cell division assay using flow cytometry reported similar results to that of a colony-survival assay (CSA).32 A CSA is the gold-standard method of evaluating radiosensitivity as it resolves the technical difficulties involved in standardisation and optimisation which interfere with predictive accuracy.5

This study was subject to certain limitations. Some of the healthy controls may have been DNA repair-deficient or radiosensitive.20,22 On the other hand, some of the obligate heterozygotes may have had a range of ATM mutations; consequently, these individuals may, like A-T patients, have exhibited various degrees of radiosensitivity both in vitro and clinically.711,19,25,28,29 Furthermore, technical issues in different laboratories can intensify such variations.22 Finally, the assay was not specific for ATM mutations and may therefore have identified mutations in other genes which modify DNA repair system efficiency. For these reasons, it is recommended that this assay be used only for the screening of families of confirmed A-T patients, as hypersensitivity in such cases is more likely to truly reflect heterozygosity of the ATM gene.33,34 Further investigation is recommended to confirm the practicality of using this assay. The results of experiments like those conducted in the current study are preliminary and need to be further confirmed in additional subjects carrying different ATM mutations.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that a modified caffeine treated G2-assay is a potential method of identifying heterozygous ATM carriers within the families of A-T patients.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The preliminary version of this study was submitted as a thesis to the Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2015.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This study was funded with the aid of a grant from the Research Center for Immunodeficiency, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (grant #26489-154-02-93).

References

  • 1.Zaki-Dizaji M, Akrami SM, Abolhassani H, Rezaei N, Aghamohammadi A. Ataxia telangiectasia syndrome: Moonlighting ATM. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13:1155–72. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1392856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zaki-Dizaji M, Akrami SM, Azizi G, Abolhassani H, Aghamohammadi A. Inflammation, a significant player of ataxia-telangiectasia pathogenesis? Inflamm Res. 2018;67:559–70. doi: 10.1007/s00011-018-1142-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chun HH, Gatti RA. Ataxia-telangiectasia, an evolving phenotype. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004;3:1187–96. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abolhassani H, Rezaei N, Mohammadinejad P, Mirminachi B, Hammarstrom L, Aghamohammadi A. Important differences in the diagnostic spectrum of primary immunodeficiency in adults versus children. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:289–302. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2015.990440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pietrucha B, Heropolitańska-Pliszka E, Gatti RA, Bernatowska E. Ataxia-telangiectasia: Guidelines for diagnosis and comprehensive care. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2007;32:234–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dizaji MZ, Rezaei N, Yaghmaie M, Yaseri M, Sayedi SJ, Azizi G, et al. Phospho-SMC1 in-cell ELISA-based detection of ataxia telangiectasia. Int J Pediatr. 2016;4:3957–67. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2016.7751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen P, Farrell A, Hobson K, Girjes A, Lavin M. Comparative study of radiation-induced G2 phase delay and chromatid damage in families with ataxia-telangiectasia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994;76:43–6. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(94)90069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sanford KK, Parshad R, Price FM, Jones GM, Tarone RE, Eierman L, et al. Enhanced chromatid damage in blood lymphocytes after G2 phase x irradiation, a marker of the ataxia-telangiectasia gene. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1050–4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.12.1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shiloh Y, Parshad R, Sanford KK, Jones GM. Carrier detection in ataxia-telangiectasia. Lancet. 1986;1:689–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91773-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tchirkov A, Bay JO, Pernin D, Bignon YJ, Rio P, Grancho M, et al. Detection of heterozygous carriers of the ataxia-telangiectasia (ATM) gene by G2 phase chromosomal radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Hum Genet. 1997;101:312–16. doi: 10.1007/s004390050634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Leonard JC, Mullinger AM, Schmidt J, Cordell HJ, Johnson RT. Genome instability in ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) families: Camptothecin- induced damage to replicating DNA discriminates between obligate A-T heterozygotes, A-T homozygotes and controls. Biosci Rep. 2004;24:617–29. doi: 10.1007/s10540-005-2796-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Djuzenova CS, Schindler D, Stopper H, Hoehn H, Flentje M, Oppitz U. Identification of ataxia telangiectasia heterozygotes, a cancer-prone population, using the single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay. Lab Invest. 1999;79:699–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Distel LV, Neubauer S. Chromosomal instability in ataxia telangiectasia. In: Ahmad SI, editor. Molecular Mechanisms of Ataxia Telangiectasia. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press; 2009. pp. 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang L, Simpson DA, Innes CL, Chou J, Bushel PR, Paules RS, et al. Gene expression signatures but not cell cycle checkpoint functions distinguish AT carriers from normal individuals. Physiol Genomics. 2013;45:907–16. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00064.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watts JA, Morley M, Burdick JT, Fiori JL, Ewens WJ, Spielman RS, et al. Gene expression phenotype in heterozygous carriers of ataxia telangiectasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:791–800. doi: 10.1086/342974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Porcedda P, Turinetto V, Orlando L, Lantelme E, Brusco A, De Marchi M, et al. Two-tier analysis of histone H2AX phosphorylation allows the identification of ataxia telangiectasia heterozygotes. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stark GR, Taylor WR. Analyzing the G2/M checkpoint. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;280:51–82. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-788-2:051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cortez D. Caffeine inhibits checkpoint responses without inhibiting the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:37139–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307088200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Terzoudi GI, Hatzi VI, Barszczewska K, Manola KN, Stavropoulou C, Angelakis P, et al. G2-checkpoint abrogation in irradiated lymphocytes: A new cytogenetic approach to assess individual radiosensitivity and predisposition to cancer. Int J Oncol. 2009;35:1223–30. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pantelias GE, Terzoudi GI. A standardized G2-assay for the prediction of individual radiosensitivity. Radiother Oncol. 2011;101:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bryant PE, Gray L, Riches AC, Steel C, Finnon P, Howe O, et al. The G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assay. Int J Radiat Biol. 2002;78:863–6. doi: 10.1080/09553000210144484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scott D, Spreadborough AR, Jones LA, Roberts SA, Moore CJ. Chromosomal radiosensitivity in G2-phase lymphocytes as an indicator of cancer predisposition. Radiat Res. 1996;145:3–16. doi: 10.2307/3579189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yeo AJ, Fantino E, Czovek D, Wainwright CE, Sly PD, Lavin MF. Loss of ATM in airway epithelial cells is associated with susceptibility to oxidative stress. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:391–3. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2210LE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maciejczyk M, Mikoluc B, Pietrucha B, Heropolitanska-Pliszka E, Pac M, Motkowski R, et al. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial abnormalities and antioxidant defense in ataxia-telangiectasia, Bloom syndrome and Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Redox Biol. 2017;11:375–83. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Humphreys MW, Nevin NC, Wooldridge MA. Cytogenetic investigations in a family with ataxia telangiectasia. Hum Genet. 1989;83:79–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00274154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Waghray M, Gascon GG, al-Sedairy S, Hannan MA. Cytogenetic investigations in three cell types of a Saudi family with ataxia telangiectasia. Hum Genet. 1991;87:285–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00200905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wiencke JK, Wara DW, Little JB, Kelsey KT. Heterogeneity in the clastogenic response to X-rays in lymphocytes from ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygotes and controls. Cancer Causes Control. 1992;3:237–45. doi: 10.1007/BF00124257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pandita TK, Hittelman WN. Increased initial levels of chromosome damage and heterogeneous chromosome repair in ataxia telangiectasia heterozygote cells. Mutat Res. 1994;310:1–13. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Claes K, Depuydt J, Taylor AM, Last JI, Baert A, Schietecatte P, et al. Variant ataxia telangiectasia: Clinical and molecular findings and evaluation of radiosensitive phenotypes in a patient and relatives. Neuromolecular Med. 2013;15:447–57. doi: 10.1007/s12017-013-8231-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prodosmo A, De Amicis A, Nisticò C, Gabriele M, Di Rocco G, Monteonofrio L, et al. p53 centrosomal localization diagnoses ataxia-telangiectasia homozygotes and heterozygotes. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1335–42. doi: 10.1172/JCI67289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dizaji MZ, Rezaei N, Yaghmaie M, Yaseri M, Sayedi SJ, Azizi G, et al. Phospho-SMC1 in-cell ELISA based detection of ataxia telangiectasia. Int J Pediatrics. 2016;4:3957–67. doi: 10.22038/IJP.2016.7751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mathew ST, Johansson P, Gao Y, Fasth A, Ek T, Hammarsten O. A flow cytometry assay that measures cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, customized for clinical routine laboratories. Clin Biochem. 2016;49:566–72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aghamohammadi A, Moin M, Kouhi A, Mohagheghi MA, Shirazi A, Rezaei N, et al. Chromosomal radiosensitivity in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Immunobiology. 2008;213:447–54. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2007.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nahas SA, Gatti RA. DNA double strand break repair defects, primary immunodeficiency disorders, and ‘radiosensitivity’. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9:510–16. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328332be17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Sultan Qaboos University

RESOURCES