Abstract
In contrast to acute peripheral nerve injury, the molecular response of Schwann cells in chronic neuropathies remains poorly understood. Onion bulb structures are a pathological hallmark of demyelinating neuropathies, but the nature of these formations is unknown. Here, we show that Schwann cells induce the expression of Neuregulin-1 type I (NRG1-I), a paracrine growth factor, in various chronic demyelinating diseases. Genetic disruption of Schwann cell-derived NRG1 signalling in a mouse model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease 1A (CMT1A), suppresses hypermyelination and the formation of onion bulbs. Transgenic overexpression of NRG1-I in Schwann cells on a wildtype background is sufficient to mediate an interaction between Schwann cells via an ErbB2 receptor-MEK/ERK signaling axis, which causes onion bulb formations and results in a peripheral neuropathy reminiscent of CMT1A. We suggest that diseased Schwann cells mount a regeneration program that is beneficial in acute nerve injury, but that overstimulation of Schwann cells in chronic neuropathies is detrimental.
Onion bulbs are a hallmark of demyelinating peripheral neuropathies. Here the authors identify Neuregulin-1 type I expression in Schwann cells as an essential mechanism involved in the formation of these characteristic structures.
Introduction
Schwann cells ensheath peripheral nerve axons with myelin membranes that provide electrical insulation for rapid impulse conduction1. Genetic defects that impair Schwann cell function underlie a heterogeneous group of demyelinating neuropathies, collectively referred to as Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease, which affects approximately 1 in 2500 humans2. The most common subtype, CMT1A, is caused by an interstitial duplication on chromosome 17, resulting in overexpression of the gene encoding the peripheral myelin protein of 22 kDa (PMP22), a small hydrophobic protein of unknown function and an integral constituent of peripheral nerve myelin3–5. Patients affected by CMT1A suffer from a slowly progressive, distally pronounced muscle weakness and sensory deficits6. Although patients usually seek medical advice in young adulthood, CMT1A manifests already during childhood by mild walking disabilities and a pronounced slowing of nerve conduction velocity (NCV), suggesting malfunction of the myelin sheath7. Indeed, peripheral nerves of CMT1A patients are characterized by developmental dysmyelination, including hypermyelination of small to mid-caliber axons and reduced internodal length8,9. Along with disease progression, demyelination and axonal loss become apparent, in addition to numerous onion bulb formations. The latter are concentrically aligned supernumerary Schwann cell processes that enwrap an inner axon–Schwann cell unit and represent a key histological disease hallmark of CMT1A disease10–12. Of note, onion bulb structures have long been used as a cardinal diagnostic criterion for demyelinating neuropathies in sural nerve biopsies from human patients. Onion bulb formations have been hypothesized to derive from displaced surviving Schwann cells that are generated during repetitive cycles of demyelination and remyelination13–15. However, the (glial) pathomechanisms that contribute to this common pathway of disease expression remain poorly understood. Within the present manuscript, we hence aimed at identifying the molecular mechanisms that cause onion bulb formations in peripheral neuropathies.
Recently, a dysdifferentiated phenotype similar to the dedifferentiation state of Schwann cells after acute nerve injury has been observed in Schwann cells of CMT1A disease16,17, suggesting that diseased Schwann cells in acute and chronic peripheral nerve diseases may have been exposed to common pathomechanisms. After acute nerve injury, Schwann cells revert from mature myelinating cells to proliferating immature cells, in a process referred to as dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation18. Although the responsible upstream mechanisms remain elusive, the process of dedifferentiation is controlled by the re-activation of mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Mek)/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (Erk) signaling and a network of transcriptional regulators in adult Schwann cells19, with a major role for the transcription factor cJUN20. Subsequently, dedifferentiated Schwann cells align in the bands of Büngner and finally redifferentiate and remyelinate regenerated axons18.
During peripheral nerve development, Schwann cell differentiation and myelination critically depend on axon-derived growth factors, namely Neuregulin-1 (NRG1)21. NRG1 belongs to a family of transmembrane and secreted epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like growth factors, which exist in various isoforms and share an EGF-like domain that is sufficient and required for the activation of ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases21–23. When expressed on the axonal surface, the transmembrane NRG1 type III isoform controls virtually all steps of Schwann cell development and ultimately regulates myelin sheath thickness21,23,24. High levels of NRG1 type II and type III, however, have been demonstrated to induce demyelination and transgenic overexpression of NRG1 type II in Schwann cells leads to tumorigenesis preceded by a hypertrophic onion bulb pathology25,26. Of note, NRG1 expression on the axonal surface is barely detectable in adulthood and dispensable for the maintenance of adult nerve functions27,28. However, Wallerian degeneration of nerve fibers induces a de novo expression of the soluble Neuregulin-1 type 1 (NRG1-I) isoform in Schwann cells, a timely restricted signal that supports nerve repair and remyelination after acute nerve injury29.
Here we demonstrate that Schwann cells in chronic demyelinating neuropathies specifically induce expression of the paracrine NRG1-I isoform, which is required for disease pathogenesis in a CMT1A mouse model. Conditional Nrg1 ablation in Schwann cells reduces major pathological disease hallmarks, including dysmyelination and onion bulb formation, and strongly ameliorates the clinical disease phenotype of adult CMT1A mice. Schwann cell-specific overexpression of soluble NRG1-I in transgenic mice reveals that onion bulb structures evolve as a consequence of glial NRG1-I-mediated survival, attraction, and alignment of supernumerary dedifferentiated Schwann cells. We suggest a model according to which Schwann cells in peripheral nerve diseases mount a common NRG1-I-mediated regeneration program, which is beneficial after acute nerve injury but turns into a detrimental persistent response in chronic peripheral neuropathies, such as CMT1A.
Results
Glial NRG1-I expression is induced in demyelinating neuropathies
Glial NRG1-I expression is upregulated following acute nerve injury29. To examine soluble NRG1-I expression in chronic peripheral nerve diseases, we performed an expression analysis in various rodent models for peripheral neuropathies at adult disease stages. Notably, we found Nrg1-I transcripts to be upregulated in chronically injured peripheral nerves, with the highest expression in demyelinating forms of peripheral neuropathies (Fig. 1a). Importantly, increased NRG1-I expression was also a feature of human sural nerve biopsies characterized by a demyelinating histopathology (Fig. 1b, c), independent of the underlying primary disease cause. Of note, NRG1-I transcriptional levels varied among individual patients and a comparison to the histopathological phenotype revealed a significant positive correlation of NRG1-I expression with the number of onion bulb formations in sural nerve biopsies (Fig. 1c). Could the induction of glial NRG1-I underlie onion bulb formation in demyelinating neuropathies?
In order to address whether NRG1-I contributes to this final common pathway of disease expression, we first investigated the time course of Nrg1-I mRNA expression in rodent models of CMT1A disease (Tg(Pmp22)Kan, termed CMT1A rat30, and Tg(PMP22)C61Clh, termed CMT1A mouse31). Here Nrg1-I mRNA expression was strongly upregulated during early postnatal development (P6–18) in the CMT1A rat and mouse models and correlated with the early postnatal myelination defect in CMT1A disease16. In contrast, Nrg1-II and Nrg1-III transcription was unaltered in both models (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 1a). A further increase in expression levels was observed with age and disease progression and included Nrg1-I transcripts encoding both the alpha- and beta-type EGF-like domain (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 1a). In line with RNA data, the C-terminal domain of NRG1 protein was readily detectable in nerve lysates from 3-month-old CMT1A rats but not in wild type (Fig. 1e). This is consistent with preferential axonal transport of the N-terminal portion of NRG1 (lacking the C-terminus) during myelination28 and low axonal NRG1 expression in adulthood. Accordingly, the NRG1 C-terminus localized to Schwann cells (but not axons) in CMT1A mouse nerve sections but was not detectable in wild type (Fig. 1f).
Ablation of glial NRG1-I ameliorates the clinical phenotype of CMT1A mice
To directly address a role of Schwann cell-derived NRG1 in CMT1A models, we ablated Nrg1 in Schwann cells from CMT1A mice by breeding to conditional DhhCre::Nrg1-flox mutants (FVB(Cg)-Tg(Dhh-cre)1Mejr/J, [DhhCre]32 and Nrg1tm3Cbm [Nrg1fl/fl]33, NRG1cKO mice), termed CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice. Analysis of CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice at P18 revealed a deterioration of the disease phenotype, with an impaired NCV and a lowered compound muscle action potential (CMAP) (Fig. 1g). In line, the number of unmyelinated axons was increased in sciatic nerves of CMT1A-NRG1cKO mutants at P18 (Fig. 1h), suggesting that Schwann cell-derived NRG1 promotes myelination in CMT1A mice during postnatal stages.
Importantly, supportive functions served by glial NRG1 in CMT1A Schwann cells were restricted to postnatal development, as adult CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice were not increasingly clinically impaired, but instead showed a strong amelioration of their clinical phenotype (Fig. 2a, b). Remarkably, motor functions of adult CMT1A-NRG1cKO animals even reached wild-type levels when quantified by rotarod and foot print analyses at 3 months of age (Fig. 2a, b). In line, electrophysiological recordings in adult CMT1A-NRG1cKO mutants revealed an improved NCV compared to single CMT1A mice (Fig. 2c, d). While the CMAP was not improved when compared to single CMT1A mice (Fig. 2c, e), the aberrantly increased temporal dispersion of CMAP amplitudes in CMT1A mice6, reflecting asynchronous conducting nerve fibers, was ameliorated in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mutants, further indicating improved nerve function (Fig. 2c, f). Does the beneficial effect of NRG1 ablation persist during disease progression in CMT1A animals? Indeed, when we analyzed CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice at the age of 11 months, we still observed a significant amelioration of the clinical phenotype in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 1b), which was accompanied by improved NCV and CMAP (Supplementary Fig. 1c).
Schwann cell NRG1 drives histopathological disease hallmarks in CMT1A
We next asked whether ablation of glial NRG1 also improves deficits in myelin architecture in CMT1A nerves8,11,16,34. Analysis at 4 and 11 months of age revealed no changes in the total number of myelinated axons per peripheral nerve in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mutants, although we noted an improved axonal caliber distribution in 11-month-old mice (Fig. 2g, Supplementary Fig. 1d–f). Likewise, Schwann cell-specific loss of NRG1 had no normalizing effect on shortened internodal length in CMT1A mice (Supplementary Fig. 2a). However, the pathological hypermyelination of small caliber axons that is characteristic of CMT1A nerves was ameliorated in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mutants as assessed by g-ratio analysis (Fig. 2h, i; Supplementary Fig. 2b, c), though Nrg1 ablation did not result in an overall reduction of myelin sheath thickness (Fig. 2h, i, Supplementary Fig. 2b, c).
Moreover, next to hypermyelination, we observed a marked reduction in the number of onion bulbs in CMT1A-NRG1cKO animals compared to single CMT1A mice at the age of 4 months (Fig. 2j, k), which remained strongly decreased throughout disease progression, i.e., in 11-month-old animals (Supplementary Fig. 2d). In summary, we conclude that glial NRG1 functions as a key driver of histopathological hallmarks including hypermyelination and onion bulb formations in CMT1A disease, which prompted us to test whether chronically increased Schwann cell-derived NRG1 signaling is sufficient to induce aspects of CMT1A pathology in vivo.
NRG1-I overexpression in Schwann cells induces a peripheral neuropathy
For this purpose, we generated two conditional transgenic mouse lines that permit Cre-mediated overexpression of Nrg1-I-ß1 and Nrg1-IIIß1 isoforms in Schwann cells, respectively (Fig. 3a, Soto-Bernardini, Götze and Schwab, unpublished). At the transcriptional level, Nrg1-I and Nrg1-III mRNA overexpression was 10–15-fold in DhhCre::Nrg1-Istop-flox (termed NRG1-I OE mice) and Nrg1-IIIstop-flox mice, respectively, comparable in extent to the endogenous upregulation of Nrg1-I mRNA in CMT1A mice (Supplementary Fig. 2e, Supplementary Fig. 1a). Western blot analysis of sciatic nerves from NRG1-I OE mice revealed the expression of a 120 kDa full-length NRG1 protein as well as a 55 kDa N-terminal (EGF-like-domain containing) fragment, consistent with proteolytic cleavage of full-length NRG1-I in the juxtamembrane region35 (Fig. 3b). This 55 kDa NRG1-I protein accumulated in CMT1A transgenic Schwann cells and was lost upon glial NRG1 ablation in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice (Fig. 3b). Importantly, Pmp22 expression itself was not affected by NRG1-I overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 2f), in line with the notion that Pmp22 overexpression mediates pathomechanisms upstream of glial NRG1.
Phenotype assessment identified a clinical impairment in adult NRG1-I OE mice, with a reduced motor performance as determined by rotarod and grip strength analysis (Fig. 3c, d). Electrophysiological recordings showed reduced NCV but no alterations in CMAP (Fig. 3e), consistent with unaltered axonal numbers in NRG1-I OE mice (Fig. 3f). Of note, internodal length was not shortened but slightly elongated in NRG1-I OE mice compared to wild type (Supplementary Fig. 2a). However, we found NRG1-I OE mice to share other key histopathological features with CMT1A mice. In particular, NRG1-I overexpression in Schwann cells induced hypermyelination of small to mid-caliber axons, without affecting myelin compaction or myelin sheath thickness of larger caliber axons (Fig. 3g, h). Likewise, the axonal diameter distribution in NRG1-I OE animals remained unaltered (Supplementary Fig. 2g). Moreover, we observed an increased process extension of those Schwann cells that were not associated with axons during the ultrastructural analysis of NRG1-I OE mice (Fig. 3i). Indeed, when quantified on sciatic nerve cross-sections NRG1-I OE mice consistently showed occasional onion bulb-like structures with extra Schwann cells forming concentric processes around a central Schwann cell-axon unit (reminiscent of CMT1A pathology), something we never observed in controls (Fig. 3j, k).
As hypermyelination of small to mid-caliber axons is also a feature of transgenic mice overexpressing NRG1 type III in neurons (C57BL/6-Tg(Thy1-Nrg1*III)1Kan+/−, (Nrg1-III tg)24) and is associated with a reduced NCV and an impaired motor phenotype without axonal degeneration or altered CMAP (Supplementary Fig. 2h–j), we hence asked whether glial overexpression of NRG1-III would result in a similar histopathological phenotype as observed in NRG1-I OE mice. However, in stark contrast to NRG1-I OE mice, glial-specific overexpression of NRG1-III in DhhCre::Nrg1-IIIstop-flox mice (see Fig. 3a) resulted in dramatic phenotypic changes, including postnatal growth retardation (Supplementary Fig. 2k), abnormal myelination of entire Remak bundles, and massive Schwann cell hyperplasia, indicative of peripheral nerve sheath tumorigenesis (Supplementary Fig. 2l–n).
In summary, these findings demonstrate a specific role for chronically upregulated Schwann cell-derived signaling of the NRG1-I isoform in precipitating key pathological hallmarks of peripheral neuropathies, including onion bulb structures.
Glial NRG1-I signaling promotes survival and attraction of Schwann cells
Which cellular mechanism underlies the formation of onion bulb structures downstream of the specific glial NRG1-I expression? To investigate the pathomechanism of onion bulb formations, we first addressed the hypothesis that onion bulb formations require the generation of supernumerary Schwann cells13–15,36. Of note, supernumerary Schwann cells in CMT1A are already present during early postnatal development37 and persist throughout the disease course. Can supernumerary Schwann cells be explained by a decreased rate of apoptosis that normally eliminates excess Schwann cells in the first weeks of postnatal development, and is this a function of glial NRG1-I as a survival factor38,39?
When we cultured primary Schwann cells in growth factor-free medium (i.e., in the absence of axons), we found a decreased number of Schwann cells in cultures derived from NRG1cKO mutants, similar to control cultures treated with a pharmacological ErbB2 receptor inhibitor (Fig. 4a, b). In line, the number of apoptotic Schwann cells as assessed by terminal deoxinucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-fluorescein nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay was increased in NRG1cKO cultures (Fig. 4c), suggesting that glial NRG1 promotes Schwann cell survival. In support of this notion, we found no evidence for NRG1-mediated increased Schwann cell proliferation in CMT1A mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a) but confirmed reduced Schwann cell apoptosis in CMT1A mice in vivo, whereas Schwann cell apoptosis was strongly increased in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mutants (Fig. 4d). As a result, Schwann cell number was normalized in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice (Fig. 4e). Finally, we observed an increased Schwann cell number and a concomitant reduction of TUNEL-positive Schwann cells in sciatic nerves of NRG1-I OE mice (Fig. 4d, f).
NRG1 serves as a chemoattractant40 and supports Schwann cell motility23,41 and therefore could mediate the concentric alignment of supernumerary Schwann cells around the axon-associated innermost Schwann cell within onion bulb formations. A Boyden chamber migration assay comparing the migration of wild-type Schwann cells towards Schwann cells derived from either wild-type or NRG1cKO mice revealed that glial NRG1 acts as a paracrine attraction signal for Schwann cells (Fig. 4g). In addition, isoform-specific BaseScope in situ hybridization for Nrg1-I in young CMT1A mice identified Nrg1-I transcription predominantly in the axon-associated, myelinating Schwann cell, in line with our immunohistochemical findings (Figs. 1f and 4h and Supplementary Fig. 3b, c). In line, supernumerary Schwann cells were found to be closely associated with Nrg1-I-overexpressing myelinating Schwann cells in NRG1-I OE mice in vivo (Fig. 4i). Taken together, these findings suggest that NRG1-I serves as a paracrine signal expressed by the innermost Schwann cell that initially promotes Schwann cell survival and subsequently attracts and aligns supernumerary Schwann cells during the formation of onion bulb structures.
Schwann cell-derived NRG1-I induces glial MEK/ERK signaling
To investigate molecular signaling pathways downstream of glial NRG1-I overexpression in CMT1A, we employed Phospho Explorer antibody arrays to compare peripheral nerve lysates from control, CMT1A, and CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice. This unbiased approach identified NRG1/ErbB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK/ERK) signaling among the most prominently regulated pathways (Fig. 5a). We biochemically confirmed ErbB2 receptor upregulation and phosphorylation as well as MEK/ERK hyperactivity in adult sciatic nerves from CMT1A mice (as previously reported16) and found both conditions to be normalized in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice (Fig. 5b). Accordingly, ErbB2 and MEK/ERK signaling activity were increased in NRG1-I OE mice (Fig. 5c), consistent with a direct role of glial NRG1-I in the stimulation of MEK/ERK signaling, independent from PMP22-mediated CMT1A pathology. A paracrine and autocrine signaling axis comprising glial NRG1-I/ErbB2/MEK/ERK was further supported by decreased MEK/ERK activity in primary Schwann cell cultures from CMT1A mice in response to pharmacological inhibition of ErbB2 receptor activity (Fig. 5d).
Glial MEK/ERK signaling constitutes an important regulator of Schwann cell dedifferentiation19 and mediates Schwann cell dysdifferentiation in CMT1A16,42. Notably, the ablation of Schwann cell-derived Nrg1 in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice normalized the expression of immaturity- and dedifferentiation-associated markers (such as cJun and Sox2). However, the expression of the genuine dedifferentiation markers Olig1 and Shh18 was not reduced (Fig. 5e), indicating that only partial dedifferentiation is a consequence of glial NRG1-I expression in CMT1A. As both supernumerary and myelinating Schwann cells in CMT1A express immaturity markers, their reduced expression in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice may result from a lower number of supernumerary (immature) Schwann cells (Fig. 4e) and a decreased aberrant expression of the respective genes in individual myelinating cells. In line with the latter, an immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the number of cJUN-positive nuclei of myelinating Schwann cells was reduced in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice (Fig. 5f). Accordingly, cJUN was expressed by supernumerary and by mature myelinating Schwann cells in NRG1-I OE mice (Fig. 5f).
Notably, peripheral nerves from NRG1-I OE mice displayed an increased expression of Schwann cell immaturity markers but not a fully dedifferentiated Schwann cell state (as determined by unaltered Olig1 and Shh expression18) (Fig. 5e), consistent with the hypothesis that hyperstimulated NRG1-I signaling alone is not sufficient to induce a fully dedifferentiated state in Schwann cells. We previously suggested that Schwann cell dedifferentiation in CMT1A results from dysbalanced pathway activity, with increased MEK/ERK and decreased phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling16. In line with incomplete dedifferentiation, NRG1-I OE mice were characterized by a concomitant activation of both MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 3d). Moreover, AKT phosphorylation (in contrast to MEK/ERK) was not normalized in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 3e), consistent with an independent defect of PMP22 transgenic Schwann cells to upregulate PI3K/AKT signaling16.
Dedifferentiation triggers onion bulbs downstream of glial NRG1-I
Could the observed differences in the differentiation state of Schwann cells in CMT1A and NRG1-I OE mice explain why onion bulbs were more frequent in CMT1A mice compared to the occasional onion bulb formations in NRG1-I-overexpressing mice? We hypothesized that Schwann cell dedifferentiation may serve as an additional trigger for the formation of onion bulb structures. Consequently, in CMT1A, the more complete dedifferentiation status of Schwann cells would promote their responsiveness to NRG1-I signaling and the subsequent formation of onion bulb structures. Nerve injury causes pronounced Schwann cell dedifferentiation18, and repetitive nerve injury has been suggested to induce onion bulb structures36. We hence postulated that nerve injury in NRG1-I OE mice may serve as a final trigger to fully dedifferentiate Schwann cells, such that supernumerary Schwann cells show enhanced responsiveness to NRG1 signaling.
Remarkably, a single nerve crush was sufficient to generate numerous onion bulb formations in NRG1-I OE mice but not in wild-type controls (Fig. 6a). When we performed the same experiment in CMT1A mice, characterized by endogenous Nrg1-I upregulation, we were likewise able to boost the generation of onion bulb formations when compared to injured wild-type controls (Fig. 6b). As predicted, this effect was lost in CMT1A mice with ablated glial Nrg1 (Fig. 6b), further demonstrating the essential role of Schwann cell-derived NRG1-I for the generation of onion bulb structures.
Limited axon–glia interactions contribute to glial NRG1-I expression
Finally, we asked what drives aberrant NRG1-I expression in CMT1A Schwann cells? Axonal NRG1 signaling controls physiological glial MEK/ERK activity during postnatal myelination43–45, and we showed previously that loss of axonal NRG1-mediated MEK/ERK signaling in Schwann cells after peripheral nerve crush induces glial NRG1-I expression29. In line, also in primary rat Schwann cells, the pharmacological inhibition of MEK/ERK induces Nrg1-I mRNA expression (Fig. 6c). Indeed, we observed a pronounced decrease in MEK/ERK activity early postnatally in CMT rats16, which precedes the upregulation of Schwann cell Nrg1 mRNA (Fig. 1d). Hence, we speculated that increased NRG1-I expression in CMT1A Schwann cells may result from an impaired access to or integration of physiological levels of axonal NRG1 signaling early postnatally during the onset of myelination.
To test this concept, we genetically increased axonal NRG1 levels in CMT1A mice by breeding transgenic mice with neuronal overexpression of NRG1. Resulting double transgenic mice indeed showed a reduction of glial Nrg1-I expression and a decreased number of onion bulb formations compared to CMT1A controls (Fig. 6d, e). In line with the dependence of NRG1-I induction from myelination, we found that the upregulation of NRG1-I in CMT1A myelinating co-cultures followed the time course of myelination and correlated with impaired longitudinal myelin growth in vitro (Fig. 6f). Notably, we observed a dramatically reduced internodal length in vivo in CMT1A animals from early postnatal development on (Fig. 6g, Supplementary Fig. 2a). Consequently, Pmp22 transgenic Schwann cells may suffer from a decreased contact area with the corresponding axon that is likely to expose individual Schwann cells to less axonally presented NRG1 during postnatal development.
In line, we have previously shown that a reduction of axonal NRG1 type III on the axonal surface in Nrg1-III heterozygous animals is sufficient to induce glial NRG1-I expression during postnatal myelination in otherwise healthy animals29. When we analyzed Nrg1-III heterozygous animals at the age of 11 months, however, we no longer found glial Nrg1-I mRNA expression to be increased (Fig. 6h), suggesting that additional factors are necessary to maintain a long-term glial Nrg1-I expression. In favor of this concept, we detected a further increase in glial Nrg1-I expression in dedifferentiated Schwann cells in CMT1A mice crossbred to Nrg1-III heterozygous animals at progressive disease stages (11 months of age, Fig. 6h). Moreover, Nrg1-III heterozygous CMT1A double mutants displayed a significantly higher number of onion bulbs compared to single CMT1A mutants at 11 months of age (Fig. 6i).
Hence, axonal NRG1 levels still contribute to glial Nrg1-I induction at later disease stages in CMT1A. We therefore hypothesize that demyelination and remyelination events in late CMT1A disease with dedifferentiated Schwann cells remyelinating mature, preexisting axons perpetuates the ontogenetic importance of the NRG1 axon–glia interaction. Indeed, mature axons are characterized by a limited expression of NRG1 on the axonal surface28. As a consequence, Schwann cell-derived NRG1-I expression should parallel disease onset in other demyelinating neuropathies. Indeed, a longitudinal analysis of the slowly progressive, late-onset demyelinating CMT1B mouse model, caused by a heterozygous deletion of the Mpz gene46,47, revealed an upregulation of Nrg1-I only during late disease stages (after P180), when demyelinating and remyelinating events become prominent (Supplementary Fig. 3f). In line, primary myelination is not defective and internodal length is unaltered in CMT1B mice46,47 (Supplementary Fig. 2a). In contrast, mice homozygous for a null mutation in the same gene (Mpz) upregulate Nrg1-I mRNA at earlier disease stages, in accordance with an early-onset severe hypomyelination (Fig. 1a). Together, these data suggest variable timing of distinct disease-associated processes that act upstream of NRG1-I induction.
Discussion
Our findings identify the induction of the NRG1-I isoform in Schwann cells as an integral part of a final common glial response in CMT1A and most likely various other demyelinating polyneuropathies. In case of CMT1A, we demonstrate that auto-paracrine NRG1-I signaling in Schwann cells is the underlying molecular pathomechanism for hypermyelination and onion bulb pathology. Onion bulbs are a hitherto unexplained key hallmark of Schwann cell pathology in demyelinating peripheral neuropathies10–13. Using Schwann cell-specific NRG1 loss- and gain-of-function mouse mutants, we show that onion bulbs result from a persistent glial NRG1-I expression by the most inner Schwann cell that contacts the associated axon. While we found NRG1-I to be predominantly expressed by the innermost Schwann cell at early disease stages in CMT1A, an additional expression by supernumerary Schwann cells at progressive disease stages, when axonal loss and demyelination and remyelination become apparent, is likely.
While supernumerary Schwann cells in wild-type mice are normally eliminated within the first postnatal weeks, they persist in peripheral nerves of CMT1A mutants due to glial NRG1-I-mediated survival functions. Subsequently, fully dedifferentiated (not simply immature) supernumerary Schwann cells18 respond to paracrine glial NRG1-I attraction signals and concentrically align in onion bulb structures. Fully dedifferentiated Schwann cells are present in CMT1A disease from early development on, due to a dysbalanced activity of PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK signaling16. However, Schwann cell dedifferentiation is also the result of acute nerve injury18 and demyelination and remyelination cycles in adult peripheral nerves, in line with our finding that acute peripheral nerve crush strongly boosted the formation of onion bulb structures in NRG1-OE mice. In conclusion, persistent glial NRG1-I signaling originating from the innermost Schwann cells in combination with Schwann cell dedifferentiation in diseased peripheral nerves promotes the formation of onion bulb structures in CMT1A.
Why is glial NRG1-I induced in CMT1A disease and various demyelinating neuropathies? We previously demonstrated that glial NRG1-I is transiently upregulated after acute nerve injury, when Schwann cells encounter a de facto loss of axonal contact29. Here we propose a model according to which Pmp22 overexpression compromises axo-glial NRG1 signaling in early CMT1A disease that results in functionally denervated Schwann cells that respond with aberrant glial NRG1-I induction (see model, Supplementary Fig. 4). This concept is supported by dramatically reduced internodal length in CMT1A disease from early postnatal development on, and a concomitant glial NRG1-I induction that parallels the onset of myelination in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrate that CMT1A Schwann cells dynamically adapt NRG1-I expression in response to altered axonal NRG1 levels in both axonal Nrg1 overexpressing and haploinsufficient mutant mice. However, we argue that changes in axonal NRG1 levels alone, i.e., without a concomitant pathological trigger, are not sufficient to drive a persistent glial NRG1-I expression in adult nerves. Indeed, we suggest that repetitive cycles of demyelination and remyelination that are characteristic of progressive CMT1A disease11–13 account for glial NRG1-I induction in adult diseased nerves. Here dedifferentiated Schwann cells remyelinate mature axons, which are characterized by a limited expression of NRG1-III27,28, in contrast to growing axons during development or after mechanical injury. Hence, in contrast to acute nerve injury, where a transient upregulation of Schwann cell-derived Nrg1-I is subsequently inhibited by axonal regrowth and concomitant re-expression of axonal NRG129, this does not occur in chronic demyelinating neuropathies.
In line, we demonstrate that Nrg1-I upregulation correlates with demyelination and remyelination events during late disease stages (P365) in CMT1B mice, which show no defects in primary myelination as compared to CMT1A disease. Thus the heterogeneity in both onset and dynamics of glial NRG1-I expression could explain the diversity of molecular Schwann cell responses and nerve histopathology in the context of different demyelinating neuropathies.
Genetic disruption of glial NRG1 in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice improved not only the histopathological disease hallmarks but also the disease phenotype of adult CMT1A animals.
Notably, the pronounced amelioration of the clinical phenotype in double mutants is accompanied by only a partial improvement on the electrophysiological level, likely reflecting a non-linear correlation between the clinical phenotype and electrophysiology, an observation also described for human patients7,48,49. We also note that the electrophysiological recordings characterize the entire sciatic nerve, whereas the clinical phenotype depends on the functional integrity of specific axonal subsets. Nevertheless, we observed a significantly improved NCV in 4- and 11-month-old CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice, which is normally driven by large caliber myelinated axons. Indeed, the NCV slowing characteristic of human CMT1A nerves and respective animal models has been attributed to the hypomyelination of large fibers in CMT1A disease6. However, the basal characteristics of myelinated fibers in CMT1A nerves are fundamentally different from wild type, which is likely to impact on the fiber types measured in electrophysiological recordings. Indeed, the overall axonal diameter is reduced in CMT1A and large caliber axons suffer from demyelination, suggesting that smaller caliber axons are more likely to contribute to electrophysiological measurements in CMT1A. Hence, the improved hypermyelination of small to mid-caliber axons in CMT1A-NRG1cKO mice may, at least partially, contribute to the improved nerve conduction in double mutants. Next to the changes in NCV, we note an improved temporal dispersion but no CMAP change in 4-month-old CMT1A-NRG1cKO animals, while at later disease stages, the CMAP is also ameliorated in double mutants. As the numbers of myelinated axons as such are not improved upon glial NRG1-I ablation, a complex interplay between the histopathological disease hallmarks and axonal function in CMT1A is probable. Indeed, the improved axonal diameter distribution in CMT1A-NRG1cKO animals that becomes present only later in disease (i.e., at 11 months of age) may provide a potential mechanism for functional impairment in CMT1A disease. However, in a progressive disease it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish cause and consequences of individual pathological parameters.
We previously demonstrated that the treatment of CMT1A rats with recombinant NRG1, when restricted to early postnatal development, improves the CMT1A disease phenotype16, in line with our present findings on the stimulatory role of Schwann cell-derived NRG1-I in CMT1A, during early postnatal stages. Thus exogenous as well as Schwann cell-derived NRG1 may adopt axonal NRG1 type III function in a timely restricted manner during early postnatal development and promote peripheral nerve myelination. Notably, the same Schwann cell response is beneficial after acute nerve injury, when survival of newly generated Schwann cells and their alignment referred to as the bands of Büngner promote nerve regeneration. However, in this scenario the regrowth of new axons subsequently terminates glial NRG1-I expression and prevents the persistent overstimulation of Schwann cells seen in CMT1A disease (see model, Supplementary Fig. 4). Here chronically active autoparacrine NRG1-I signaling in CMT1A induces a signaling axis between dedifferentiated Schwann cells, which ultimately leads to adverse glial interactions and the formation of onion bulb structures. Importantly, we show that dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation renders Schwann cells more susceptible to NRG1-I stimulation, as nerve lesion amplified onion bulb formation in NRG1-OE mice, which further underlines that the Schwann cell repair program does not reflect a simple recapitulation of nerve development18.
Altogether, we conclude that paracrine NRG1-I signaling has evolved as a universal Schwann cell repair response. However, the ultimate function of glial NRG1-I transforms from a beneficial to a detrimental role in CMT1A disease, due to a missing counteraction (by axonal NRG1 type III) that normally restricts the temporal NRG1-I expression upon nerve repair in acute injury. Consequently, while we show that the basic cellular mechanisms are conserved between acutely and chronically injured Schwann cells, matching emerging treatment approaches have to adopt antithetic therapeutic strategies. Specifically, the pharmacological blockade of ErbB2 receptors in adult CMT1A patients might prevent aberrant glial NRG1 signaling and constitute a promising approach for future experimental trials. Indeed, ErbB2 receptor inhibitors are used in patients for breast cancer therapy and proved safe in routine clinical application50. In summary, glial NRG1-I/ErbB2-mediated paracrine and autocrine stimulation represents a novel neurological disease mechanism that constitutes an attractive target for therapeutic approaches of demyelinating peripheral nerve diseases.
Methods
Human material
Human samples were selected according to the histological findings in sural nerve biopsies. Sural nerve biopsies with no major pathological findings (with respect to inflammation, axonal and myelin pathology, vascular pathology) were assigned to the control group. Sural nerve biopsies with a neuropathological diagnosis of a demyelinating neuropathy (with signs of demyelination, remyelination, and onion bulb formations but no major acute axonal pathology) were assigned to the experimental group of demyelinating polyneuropathies. Selection of patients was performed upon availability of fresh frozen material and according to exclusion/inclusion criteria. Samples were anonymized and processed in a blinded manner. Selected patients were of mixed age, between >30 years and <70 years of age (inclusion criteria) and did not suffer from another severe neurological disorder at time point of biopsy (exclusion criteria). No other criteria besides the described characteristics were applied, and all patients did provide informed consent in accordance with the ethical compliance guidelines. The study received ethical approval by the ethic board of the University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
Prior to lysis for RNA extraction, fresh frozen sural nerve biopsies were incubated in RNAlaterTM-ICE frozen tissue transition solution (ThermoFisher) for 1 week at −80 °C. After incubation, sural nerves were transferred to room temperature (RT) and all endoneural tissue was separated from surrounding tissue. Endoneurial tissue was than further processed as described under “RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis.”
Animal models
Pmp22 transgenic rats (Tg(Pmp22)Kan)30 and PMP22 transgenic mice (Tg(PMP22)C61Clh)31, Pmp22+/− mice (Pmp22tm1Ueli)51, Mpz−/− mice (Mpztm1Msch)47, Mpz+/−mice (Mpztm1Msch)46, mice transgenic for neuronal Nrg1 type I (C57BL/6-Tg(Thy1-Nrg1*I)1Kan+/−, Thy1-Nrg1(I) tg) and neuronal Nrg1 type III (C57BL/6-Tg(Thy1-Nrg1*III)1Kan+/−, Thy1-Nrg1(III) tg)24, the Dhh-Cre driver line (FVB(Cg)-Tg(Dhh-cre)1Mejr/J; DhhCre)32, Nrg1-flox (Nrg1tm3CBm; Nrg1fl/fl)33, and SodG93A mice (B6SJL-Tg(SOD1*G93A)1Gur/J)52 were used and genotyped. For PCR, genomic DNA from tail biopsies was isolated by incubation in modified Gitschier buffer supplemented with TritonX-100 and proteinase K for at least 2 h at 55 °C with subsequent heat inactivation of proteinase K at 90 °C for 10 min. For routine genotyping, PCR primers were used in a coamplification reaction. Primer sequences are available upon request.
For the generation of conditional Nrg1-I and Nrg1-III transgenic mice, STOP-Nrg1 transgenes were generated by PCR amplification from a mouse Nrg1-Iß1a or a Nrg1-IIIß1a cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. Cary Lai, Indiana University) and cloned into XhoI (Nrg1-I) or SpeI/XhoI restriction sites (Nrg1-III) of the β-actin-STOP-eGFP-flox cassette in a pBluescriptKS vector. Sequences of primers and transgene cassettes are available upon request. Transgene cassettes were excised from vector backbone by digestion with SpeI/AgeI (Nrg1-I) or SalI (Nrg1-III) and injected into C57Bl/6N oocytes. The transgenic lines Nrg1-I stop flox and Nrg1-III stop flox were maintained on a C57Bl/6N background.
Experimental autoimmune neuritis was induced in rats53. Briefly, female rats (age: 3 months, Charles River) underwent subcutaneous injections in the hind footpad of 8 mg of bovine peripheral nerve myelin54, emulsified in 100 µl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and mixed with 100 µl complete Freund’s adjuvant (Difco) containing 1 mg/ml heat-inactivated Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Ra). Sciatic nerves samples were taken at the disease peak (day 15).
For the induction of toxin-induced neuropathy, Oxaliplatin was administered in adult rats by intraperitoneal injection of 2.4 mg/kg oxaliplatin for 5 consecutive days every week for 3 weeks55. Rats were sacrificed and sciatic nerve sampled at day 21.
A model of type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy was generated by Streptozotocin administration in mice by intraperitoneal injection of a single high dose of 200 mg/kg Streptozotocin56. Mice were checked for diabetic symptoms 8 weeks after injection and only mice with elevated blood glucose levels were used for analyses. Sciatic nerves were sampled 8 weeks after injection.
All animal experiments were conducted according to the Lower Saxony State regulations for animal experimentation in Germany as approved by the Niedersächsische Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES) and in compliance with the guidelines of the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-established. Animals were randomly included according to genotyping results, age, and weight in the experiments. Animals were excluded prior to experiments in case of impaired health condition or weight difference to the average group of >10%. Exclusion criteria, during or after the experiment was performed, comprise impaired health condition of single animals not attributed to genotype or experiment (according to veterinary) or weight loss >10% of the average group. No animals had to be excluded owing to illness/weight loss in all the performed animal experiments. Exclusion criteria regarding the outcome assessment were determined with an appropriate statistical test, the Grubbs’ test (or ESD method) using the statistic software Graph Pad (Prism).
Animal experiments (phenotype analyses, electrophysiology, and histology) were conducted in a single blinded fashion toward the investigator. Selection of animal samples out of different experimental groups for molecular biology/histology/biochemistry was performed randomly and in a blinded fashion.
Sciatic nerve crush
Adult mice were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride/xylazine hydrochloride (100 mg/kg body weight (BW) and 8 mg/kg BW) and the sciatic nerve was exposed. The nerve was crushed at the mid-femoral level by a standardized compression with artery forceps for 40 s. The mice were sacrificed 28 days after injury and the ipsilateral sciatic nerves were dissected and processed for electron microscopy (EM) and analyzed 4 mm distal to the injury site.
Motor performance
All phenotype analyses were performed by the same investigator who was blinded toward genotype. Motor performance was assessed in standardized grip strength tests for hind limbs57 and rotarod test58. Hind-limb grip strength was measured by supporting the forelimbs and pulling the animal’s tail toward a horizontal bar connected to a gauge. The maximum force (measured in Newton) exerted onto the T-bar was recorded and the mean of 10 repeated measurements was calculated. Rotarod test was performed with the Rotarod system 3375.5 (TSE systems) on 4 consecutive days following 2 days of training. Mice were placed on a rotating rod that was accelerated from 5 to 40 rpm in 300 s. Mean holding time of five consecutive trials on each day was recorded.
Foot print test
To obtain the foot print length, the hind paws of the animals were painted with black ink and then placed on a small gangway (42 cm long, 10 cm wide, walls 13 cm high) on a white paper. The paper was scanned and the foot length was measured using imageJ59. For analysis, the average of ten foot prints (five of each side) of each mouse was calculated.
EM and morphometry
Nerves were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB, contrasted with osmium tetroxide, and Epon embedded. Semithin cross-sections (0.5 µm) were cut using a microtome (Leica, UC7) with a diamond knife (Histo HI 4317, Diatome). Sections were stained with Azur II-methylene blue for 1 min at 60 °C. Light microscopic images were captured with the Axio Imager Z1 (Zeiss) in ×100 maginification. Analysis was performed on total nerve cross-section. For EM of nerves, ultrathin (50–70 nm) cross-sections were stained with 1% uranylacetate solution and lead citrate60 and analyzed using a Zeiss EM900 or LEO912. For quantification of histological parameters as the number of unmyelinated fibers, Schwann cell nuclei, and the g-ratio (calculated by determination of the axon area and the area of the fibre including the myelin sheath and subsequent calculation of the diameter of a hypothetical circular area, and subsequent division of the axon diameter by the fibre diameter), at least 20 random taken pictures were captured at a magnification of ×3000.
Internodal length-teased fibers
Tibial nerves of 4-month-old mice and sciatic nerves of 18-day-old rats were dissected and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde overnight at 4 °C. Nerves were washed twice in PBS and subsequently fixed in 1% Osmiumtetroxide for 2 h at RT, washed, and incubated over night in 60% glycerol at 4 °C. Nerves were then transferred in 100% glycerol and teased into single nerve fibers. For each animal, at most 40 teased fibers and 35–110 internodes were measured and analyzed. Images were taken with an Axio Imager Z1 with ×20 magnification and intermodal length was measured using ImageJ.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical analysis, sciatic nerve and tibial nerve of mice was dissected and either fixed in 4% PFA and embedded in paraffin or fresh frozen in OCT. Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 5 µm and fresh frozen samples at 14 µm and mounted on Superfrost Plus slides (Thermo Scientific). Paraffin samples were deparaffinized using a standard xylol and ethanol series. Target retrieval was induced by heating in citrate buffer, samples were blocked with goat or horse serum, and incubated overnight with primary antibody against NRG1 (C-terminal, polyclonal rabbit, 1:200, Santa Cruz, #SC348), cJUN (monoclonal rabbit, 1:800, Cell Signaling, #9165), and MPZ (monoclonal mouse, 1:500, Archelos). Samples were further incubated with their corresponding secondary cyanine dyes (1:1000, Dianova: anti-rabbit, Cy3, cat.#111-165-144; anti-mouse, Cy2, cat.#115-225-071) for 1 h at RT. Cryosections were postfixed in 4% PFA for 5 min, incubated in ice-cold methanol/acetone (95:5) for 10 min, and blocked in goat serum. The primary antibody for SOX10 (polyclonal rabbit, 1:100, Abcam, #ab107532) was incubated over three nights at 4 °C and the corresponding secondary cyanine dye (1:1000, Dianova: anti-rabbit, Cy3, cat.#111-165-144) was incubated for 1 h at RT. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and samples were mounted in Aqua Polymount and complete cross-sections were analyzed. Digital images of stained sections were obtained by fluorescent microscopy with the Axio Observer Z1 (Zeiss) and Zen Imaging Software (Zeiss). Images were processed by using the NIH ImageJ, Photoshop CS (Adobe), and Illustrator 10 (Adobe) software.
BaseScopeTM in situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed with the BaseScopeTM Detection Reagent Kit—RED (ACDbio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on paraffin-embedded samples of sciatic nerves of wild-type and PMP22 transgenic mice at the age of P18. In short, sciatic nerves of P18 mice were dissected, fixed in 4% PFA for about 20 h, and embedded in paraffin. They were cut in 5-µm sections and dried at least overnight at RT. Sections were baked at 65 °C for 1 h, deparaffinized with xylene and ethanol, and incubated with hydrogen peroxide with subsequent target retrieval for 15 min in provided target retrieval agent. Samples were incubated with provided proteaseIII for 30 min at 40 °C in HybEZTM (ACDbio) oven followed by hybridization for 2 h at 40 °C with target and control probes and subsequent incubation with amplification reagents. The exon junction spanning probe targeted region 834–866 on gene XM_017312638.1 (5′-CCGCCGAAGGCGACCCGAGCCCAGCATTGCCTC-3′). For myelin counterstaining, the samples were washed twice in PBS after BaseScope incubation and blocked with goat serum. Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with MBP antibody (1:500, mM, Covance, SMI-94) and with its corresponding cyanine dye (1:1000, Dianova, anti-mouse, Cy2, cat.#115-225-071) for 1 h at RT and mounted in Aqua Polymount. Images were obtained by phase and fluorescent light microscopy (Axio Observer Z1 and Axio Imager Z1, Zeiss).
RNA preparation and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis
Total RNA was extracted from nerve tissue using Qiazol Reagent and RNA from cell culture was purified using RLT lysis buffer, each according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Qiagen). The integrity of purified RNA was confirmed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies). For reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis, cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using poly-Thymin and random nonamer primers and Superscript III RNase H reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). qPCR was carried out using the Roche LC480 Detection System and GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega). Reactions were carried out in four replicates. The relative quantity (RQ) of RNA was calculated using the LC480 Software (Roche). Results were depicted as histograms (generated by Microsoft-Excel 2010) of normalized RQ values, with mean RQ value in the given control group normalized to 1. Unless indicated otherwise, the housekeeping genes peptidylprolyl isomerase A (Ppia) and ribosomal protein, large, P0 (Rplp0) were used as internal standards. For PCR primer sequences, see Supplementary Table 1.
Protein analysis
Sciatic nerves and cultured cells were transferred to sucrose lysis buffer (320 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris, 1 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM MgCl2) containing protease (Complete, Roche) and phosphatase (PhosSTOP, Roche) inhibitors and homogenized using the Precellys homogenizer (Peqlab). The homogenate was dissolved in Laemmli loading buffer (10 mM Tris, 1.55% w/v dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.6% v/v glycerine, 0.2% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.008% w/v bromophenol blue) and 10% of a 250 mM DTT solution was added to the mixture following a short centrifugation. For all western blots, 10 µg protein (except pErbB2, 30 µg) were loaded on a 4–12% Bis-Tris gradient gel (NuPAGE, Thermo Fisher) in 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) running buffer (25 mM MOPS, 25 mM Tris, 0.1% w/v SDS, 0.03% w/v EDTA) using PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (10–250 kDa, Thermo Fisher) as loading and size control. Following separation, the proteins were transferred on an Amersham Hybond PVDF membrane (pore size 0.45 µm, GE Helathcare) with the wet blot Mini Trans-Blot Cell system (Bio-Rad) for 3 h at 100 V and 4 °C. For detection of the total protein content on the membrane, a whole protein stain was performed. The membrane was washed 5 times for 5 min each in bi-distilled water to remove any buffer residues after the transfer. Following an incubation with fluorescent Fast Green (Sigma Aldrich) staining solution (0.00084% w/v Fast Green, 30% v/v methanol, 6.7% glacial acetic acid) for 5 min at RT and protected from light. Fast Green dye bound specifically to the whole protein content on the membrane. Removal of excessive staining solution was performed by two washing steps with washing solution (30% v/v methanol, 6.7% v/v glacial acetic acid) for 30 s each at RT and protected from light. Fluorescent Fast Green signal was detected on an Intas ECL Chemostar (INTAS Science Imaging Instruments) with exposure times from 1 to 5 s, an emission wavelength of 650 nm, and a band-elimination filter with a wavelength of 665 nm. Subsequently, the membrane was washed twice in bi-distilled water for 5 min at RT after which blocking of the membrane was conducted by incubation in bovine serum albumin (BSA)-TBST solution (5% w/v BSA, 25 mM Tris, 75 mM NaCl, 5% v/v Tween 20) for 2 h at RT. Detection of immunolabeled proteins was performed using chemiluminescence (NEN Life Science Products). Western blots were incubated overnight with primary antibodies against p-AKT (Ser473, #3787), AKT (#9275), p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204, #9101), ERK1/2 (#4695) (all pRb; 1:1000, Cell Signalling), p-ERBB2 (Y877, pRb; 1:500, Cell Signaling, cat.#2241), ERBB2 (pRb, 1:500, Santa Cruz, sc-284), GAPDH (mM; 1:5000, Enzo Life Sciences, Clone 1D4, ADI-CSA-335-E), Actin (1:1000, EMD Millipore, Clone C4, MAB1501), NRG1-N-terminal (1:200, mM, Santa Cruz, #SC393006), and NRG1-C-terminal (1:200, pRb, Santa Cruz, #SC348).
Phospho explorer assay
For protein phosphorylation screening, sciatic nerves of five P30 animals for each of the three groups (Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre, PMP22 tg::Nrg1fl/fl, PMP22 tg::Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre) were dissected, pooled, and applied to the Explorer Antibody Microarray (Full Moon BioSystems, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, protein was extracted from the tissue and the quality and quantity was measured with A280 spectrum. Subsequently, the proteins were biotinylated, conjugated to the array, and detected by a streptavidin dye. Phosphoarrays were imaged using a G2505B DNA microarray scanner (Agilent) at 5-μm resolution. Scan images were modified using Photoshop (Adobe): tonal values were set to 0–30 and regions containing no spots were cropped. Spot intensities were quantified manually using Delta2D (Decodon). For each spot position, a circular spot region was generated, labeled, and total signal intensity was determined. Intensity values were exported. Spot quality was evaluated for signal intensity being of above the average intensity of the internal negative control spots for at least 3 of the 4 replicate spots per epitope on each array. The arithmetic mean of the detected signals from two spatially separated spots per antibody/target was formed and used to calculate the fold change in signal intensity between the following groups: Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre versus PMP22 tg:: Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre (comparison 1) and PMP22 tg::Nrg1fl/fl versus PMP22 tg:: Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre (comparison 2). Because the data included multiple phospho-sites per protein and the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Qiagen) allows only one identifier (Swiss Prot) per target and group, all entries were curated. Briefly, the phospho-sites of one protein were first sorted by their ability to activate or inhibit the function of the corresponding protein or the protein-related activity using most recent literature concerning the regulatory ability of each phospho-site and taking the PhosphoSitePlus database (Cell Signaling). Next, a scoring scheme was applied to evaluate whether the respective phospho-site is differentially regulated between the two comparisons by the means of being upregulated in PMP22 tg animals (comparison 1) and downregulated in PMP22 tg after ablation of glial Nrg1-I (comparison 2). Therefore, all phospho-sites gathered one point each if the fold change in group 1 was ≥1.5-fold increased and ≥1.5-fold decreased in group 2, ending up in a maximum score of 2. The phospho-site with the highest score for each protein was then used for further analysis. If more than one site had the same score, the fold changes of the three groups were multiplied (a fold change <1 was reverted by calculating 1/fold change) and the phospho-site with the highest product was chosen as the most differentially regulated for the respective protein. After each protein was represented by one entry per group, fold changes of inhibitory phospho-sites were reverted (1/fold change) and the data were uploaded as log2 ratio into the IPA software using the Swiss-Prot ID as identifier. A core analysis for each comparison was performed using a fold-change cutoff of 1.5 and a p value cutoff of 0.05 (Fisher’s Exact Test). Next, a comparative analysis was used to identify differentially regulated pathways between the two comparisons that was performed with the recommended settings of the software. Finally, the results were refined by setting a p value cutoff of –log10(45) and sorted by the most differentially, inversely regulated pathways between the 2 groups and Z-score.
Primary cell culture
Mouse and rat Schwann cells were prepared from sciatic nerves of newborn mice and rats (3–4 days old)61. For cell expansion, media for mouse Schwann cells were supplied with 10% deactivated Hyclone fetal calf serum (FCS; GE Healthcare & Life Technologies), 10 ng per ml medium recombinant human Neuregulin-1 beta EGF like domain (EGF-ld, Reprokine), and 4 µM forskolin (Sigma); for rat Schwann cells with 10% FCS, 100 µg/mL bovine pituitary extract (Sigma), and 4 µM Forskolin (Sigma). Experiments for directed migration were performed with the “CytoSelectTM 24-well cell migration assay 8 µm” (Boyden chamber, Cell Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mouse Schwann cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FCS, 4 µM FSK, and 10 ng/mL EGF. Cells in their second passage were seeded into PLL-coated wells (bottom chamber) and baskets (top chamber) of the migration assay (20,000 cells each). The top compartment was always seeded with wild-type Schwann cells, whereas in the bottom compartment either wild-type or Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre Schwann cells were seeded. The cells were allowed to attach for 4 h in DMEM supplemented only with 0.5% FCS and afterwards washed with PBS to remove FCS completely. The basket was then transferred to the bottom chamber and incubated for 19 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM only or supplemented with recombinant NRG1 in rescue experiments. Migrated cells were dissociated from the membrane with detachment buffer, lysed, and quantified using CyQuantGR Fluorescent Dye62 and a fluorescent plate reader at 480 nm/520 nm (Synergy MX, Biotec). The experiment was conducted with three independent cell culture preparations.
Survival experiments were performed in three biological replicates, respectively, with rat wild-type Schwann cells and mouse Nrg1fl/fl and Nrg1fl/fl::DhhCre Schwann cells. Seeded cells were washed five times in DMEM and kept on DMEM only. Rat wild-type Schwann cells were treated with an ErbB2-Inhibitor (CAS 928207-02-7, Calbiochem, 30 µM in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) or DMSO as control (1:1000). Images were taken at 0 and 48 h with the Axio Observer Z1 (Zeiss). Mutant mouse Schwann cells were kept in DMEM for 72 h and analyzed for apoptosis as described below.
Dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) cultures were prepared by isolating DRGs from wild-type or PMP22 transgenic31 mouse embryos at embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5) and plated according to the standard procedure63. DRGs were dissociated with trypsin and plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells per 1 mm coverslip coated with collagen (Gibco). The cells were kept in growth medium comprised of minimum essential medium (Gibco) supplied with 10% deactivated Hyclone fetal bovine serum (GE Healthcare & Life Technologies) and 50 ng/ml NGF (Alomone laboratories) for 1 week. In order to induce myelination, growth medium was supplemented with 50 ng/ml ascorbic acid (Sigma) every other day.
Schwann cell apoptosis and proliferation
For analysis of Schwann cell proliferation, mice were injected with 40 mg/kg BW EdU (Invitrogen) intraperitoneally at the age of P10. Sciatic nerves were dissected after 24 h, fixed in 4% PFA, and embedded in paraffin. Cross-sections were stained with the “Click-iT EdU Imaging Kit Alexa Fluor555” (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and counterstained with MBP (1:1000, mM, Covance # SMI-94).
For analysis of apoptosis, sciatic nerves of 11-day-old mice were dissected (i.e., in the phase of physiological postnatal Schwann cell elimination). Nerves were fixed in 4% PFA, embedded in paraffin, and longitudinal sections (14 µm thickness) were mounted on Superfrost Plus slides.
Primary mouse Schwann cells were prepared and cultured for a survival assay as described above. Apoptosis was assessed by conducting a TUNEL assay with the “DeadEndTM Colorimetric TUNEL System” Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. The apoptosis rate was quantified by counting the number of TUNEL-positive nuclei over the total number of nuclei.
Electrophysiology
For standard electroneurography29, mice were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride/xylazine hydrochloride (100 mg/kg BW/ 8 mg/kg BW) and pairs of steel needle electrodes (Schuler Medizintechnik, Freiburg, Germany) were placed subcutaneously along the nerve at the sciatic notch (proximal stimulation) and the tibial nerve above the ankle (distal stimulation), respectively. Supramaximal square wave pulses lasting 100 ms were delivered using a Toennies Neuroscreen® (Jaeger, Hoechsberg, Germany). CMAP was recorded from the intrinsic foot muscles using steel electrodes. Both amplitudes and latencies of CMAP were determined. The distance between the two sites of stimulation was measured alongside the skin surface with fully extended legs and NCVs were calculated automatically from sciatic nerve latency measurements.
Statistical analysis
For power analysis, the software G*Power Version 3.1.7. was used. Power analyses were performed before conducting in vivo experiments (a priori). Adequate power (1 − beta error) was defined as ≥80% and the alpha error as 5%.
Data are expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless indicated otherwise. All other data was processed and statistically analyzed using MS Excel and GraphPad Prism v6.04, unless indicated otherwise. The statistical test that was used to analyze the data is indicated in the figure legends. Briefly, for comparing two groups Student’s T test was used, for comparing more than two groups one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with appropriate post test was used, and for comparing two or more groups for more than one time point (longitudinal analysis) two-way ANOVA with appropriate post test was used. Statistical differences were considered to be significant when p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Reporting Summary
Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Huxley (Imperial College School of Medicine, London) for providing Pmp22 transgenic mice, C. Birchmeier (MDC Berlin) for providing Nrg1flox mice, R. Martini (U Wuerzburg) and Melitta Schachner (ZMNH, Hamburg) for providing Mpz−/− mice, and Dies Meijer (U Edinburgh) for DhhCre animals. We are grateful to A. Mott, T. Durkaya, C. Maack, T. Ruhwedel, A. Fahrenholz, T. Pawelz, and M. Wehe (MPI of Experimental Medicine) as well as to A. Wohltmann (Institute of Neuropathology, Göttingen), S. Richter (Department of Neuropathology, Leipzig), and J. Craatz (Institute of Anatomy, Leipzig) for technical support. This work was funded by the ERA-NET for Research Programs on Rare Diseases E-RARE-3 (01GM1605) and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, FKZ: 01GM1511C). M.C.S.-B. acknowledges funding by Doctoral Fellowships from the DAAD, the Institute of Technology of Costa Rica (TEC) and the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Telecommunication of Costa Rica (MICITT). M.H.S. holds a Heisenberg Fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and acknowledges funding by a DFG research grant (SCHW741/4-1). K.-A.N. is supported by the DFG (CNMPB and SPP1757) and holds an ERC Advanced grant.
Author contributions
R.F. and R.M.S. designed and supervised the study, performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. D.A. performed and planned the experiments and contributed to the manuscript. T.A.A., V.S., D.H., E.S., M.C.S.-B., A.K., T.G., K.K., T.K., and C.F. contributed to experiments. W.M., M.K. and I.B. contributed to electron microscopy. W.B. contributed to human samples. W.C.M. contributed to immunohistochemistry. M.W.S. contributed CMT1A rat samples and contributed to discussions. M.H.S. generated and provided Nrg1-I and -IIIstop-flox mice and contributed to the manuscript and discussion. K.A.N. contributed to the manuscript and discussion.
Data availability
All relevant data of the present manuscript are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 1a–d, g, h, 2a, b, d–i, k, 3c–h, k, 4a–g, 5a–f, and 6a–i are available as a Source Data file.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Robert Fledrich, Dagmar Akkermann.
Change history
4/16/2019
Michael W. Sereda was incorrectly associated with the Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hanover, Germany. The correct affiliations for Michael W. Sereda are Department of Neurogenetics, Max-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hermann-Rein-Str. 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Contributor Information
Robert Fledrich, Email: robert.fledrich@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Markus H. Schwab, Email: schwab.markus@mh-hannover.de
Klaus-Armin Nave, Email: nave@em.mpg.de.
Ruth M. Stassart, Email: ruth.stassart@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-09385-6.
References
- 1.Nave KA. Myelination and support of axonal integrity by glia. Nature. 2010;468:244–252. doi: 10.1038/nature09614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skre H. Genetic and clinical aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth’s disease. Clin. Genet. 1974;6:98–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1974.tb00638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valentijn LJ, et al. The peripheral myelin gene PMP–22/GAS–3 is duplicated in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A. Nat. Genet. 1992;1:166–170. doi: 10.1038/ng0692-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Timmerman V, et al. The peripheral myelin protein gene PMP-22 is contained within the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A duplication. Nat. Genet. 1992;1:171–175. doi: 10.1038/ng0692-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li J, Parker B, Martyn C, Natarajan C, Guo J. The PMP22 gene and its related diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2013;47:673–698. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8370-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pareyson D, Marchesi C. Diagnosis, natural history, and management of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Lancet. 2009;8:654–667. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yiu EM, Burns J, Ryan MM, Ouvrier RA. Neurophysiologic abnormalities in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2008;13:236–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2008.00182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gabreëls-Festen aa, et al. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A: morphological phenotype of the 17p duplication versus PMP22 point mutations. Acta Neuropathol. 1995;90:645–649. doi: 10.1007/BF00318579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saporta MA, et al. Shortened internodal length of dermal myelinated nerve fibres in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Brain. 2009;132:3263–3273. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marie P, Bertrand I. Contribution a l’anatomie pathologique de la névrite hypertrophique familial. Ann. Med. 1918;5:209–258. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dyck PJ. Histologic measurements and fine structure of biopsied sural nerve: normal, and in peroneal muscular atrophy, hypertrophic neuropathy, and congenital sensory neuropathy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1966;41:742–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bilbao Juan, M. & Schmidt, R. Biopsy Diagnosis of Peripheral Neuropathy (Springer, Cham, 2015).
- 13.Pleasure DE, Towfighi J. Onion bulb neuropathies. Arch. Neurol. 1972;26:289–301. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1972.00490100019001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dyck PJ. Experiences in hypertrophic neuropathy. Pathogenesis of onion-bulb formations produced by repeated tourniquet applications. Arch. Neurol. 1969;21:73–95. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1969.00480130087010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pollard JD, King RH, Thomas PK. Recurrent experimental allergic neuritis. An electron microscope study. J. Neurol. Sci. 1975;24:365–383. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(75)90257-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fledrich R, et al. Soluble neuregulin-1 modulates disease pathogenesis in rodent models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A. Nat. Med. 2014;20:1055–1061. doi: 10.1038/nm.3664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klein D, Groh J, Wettmarshausen J, Martini R. Nonuniform molecular features of myelinating Schwann cells in models for CMT1: distinct disease patterns are associated with NCAM and c-Jun upregulation. Glia. 2014;62:736–750. doi: 10.1002/glia.22638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jessen KR, Mirsky R. The repair Schwann cell and its function in regenerating nerves. J. Physiol. 2016;0:1–11. doi: 10.1113/JP270874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Napoli I, et al. A central role for the ERK-signaling pathway in controlling Schwann cell plasticity and peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron. 2012;73:729–742. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arthur-Farraj PJ, et al. c-Jun reprograms Schwann cells of injured nerves to generate a repair cell essential for regeneration. Neuron. 2012;75:633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nave KA, Salzer JL. Axonal regulation of myelination by neuregulin 1. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006;16:492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Falls DL. Neuregulins: functions, forms, and signaling strategies. Exp. Cell Res. 2003;284:14–30. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4827(02)00102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Birchmeier C, Nave KA. Neuregulin-1, a key axonal signal that drives Schwann cell growth and differentiation. Glia. 2008;56:1491–1497. doi: 10.1002/glia.20753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Michailov GV, et al. Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science. 2004;304:700–703. doi: 10.1126/science.1095862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Syed N, et al. Soluble neuregulin-1 has bi-functional, concentration-dependent effects on Schwann cell myelination. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:6122–6131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1681-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huijbregts RP, Roth KA, Schmidt RE, Carroll SL. Hypertrophic neuropathies and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in transgenic mice overexpressing glial growth factor beta3 in myelinating Schwann cells. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:7269–7280. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-19-07269.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fricker FR, et al. Axonally derived neuregulin-1 is required for remyelination and regeneration after nerve injury in adulthood. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:3225–3233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2568-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Velanac V, et al. Bace1 processing of NRG1 type III produces a myelin-inducing signal but is not essential for the stimulation of myelination. Glia. 2012;60:203–217. doi: 10.1002/glia.21255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stassart RM, et al. A role for Schwann cell-derived neuregulin-1 in remyelination. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:48–54. doi: 10.1038/nn.3281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sereda M, et al. A transgenic rat model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuron. 1996;16:1049–1060. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80128-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huxley C, et al. Construction of a mouse model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A by pronuclear injection of human YAC DNA. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1996;5:563–569. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.5.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jaegle M, et al. The POU proteins Brn-2 and Oct-6 share important functions in Schwann cell development. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1380–1391. doi: 10.1101/gad.258203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li L, et al. The breast proto-oncogene, HRGalpha regulates epithelial proliferation and lobuloalveolar development in the mouse mammary gland. Oncogene. 2002;21:4900–4907. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kobsar I, Hasenpusch-Theil K, Wessig C, Müller HW, Martini R. Evidence for macrophage-mediated myelin disruption in an animal model for Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 1A. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005;81:857–864. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wen D, et al. Structural and functional aspects of the multiplicity of Neu differentiation factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:1909–1919. doi: 10.1128/MCB.14.3.1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ohara S, Ikuta F. Schwann cell responses during regeneration after one or more crush injuries to myelinated nerve fibres. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1988;14:229–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1988.tb00884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sancho S, Young P, Suter U. Regulation of Schwann cell proliferation and apoptosis in PMP22-deficient mice and mouse models of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A. Brain. 2001;124:2177–2187. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.11.2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Parkinson DB, Langner K, Namini SS, Jessen KR, Mirsky R. β-Neuregulin and autocrine mediated survival of Schwann cells requires activity of Ets family transcription factors. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2002;20:154–167. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2002.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Grinspan JB, Marchionni Ma, Reeves M, Coulaloglou M, Scherer SS. Axonal interactions regulate Schwann cell apoptosis in developing peripheral nerve: neuregulin receptors and the role of neuregulins. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:6107–6118. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-06107.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Flames N, et al. Short- and long-range attraction of cortical GABAergic interneurons by neuregulin-1. Neuron. 2004;14:251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Meintanis S, Thomaidou D, Jessen KR, Mirsky R, Matsas R. The neuron-glia signal beta-neuregulin promotes Schwann cell motility via the MAPK pathway. Glia. 2001;34:39–51. doi: 10.1002/glia.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kohl B, Fischer S, Groh J, Wessig C, Martini R. MCP-1/CCL2 modifies axon properties in a PMP22-overexpressing mouse model for Charcot-Marie-tooth 1A neuropathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176:1390–1399. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ishii A, Fyffe-Maricich SL, Furusho M, Miller RH, Bansal R. ERK1/ERK2 MAPK signaling is required to increase myelin thickness independent of oligodendrocyte differentiation and initiation of myelination. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:8855–8864. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0137-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Newbern JM, et al. Specific functions for ERK/MAPK signaling during PNS development. Neuron. 2011;69:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sheean ME, et al. Activation of MAPK overrides the termination of myelin growth and replaces Nrg1/ErbB3 signals during Schwann cell development and myelination. Genes Dev. 2014;28:290–303. doi: 10.1101/gad.230045.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Martini R, et al. Protein zero (P0)-deficient mice show myelin degeneration in peripheral nerves characteristic of inherited human neuropathies. Nat. Genet. 1995;3:281–286. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Giese KP, et al. Mouse P0 gene disruption leads to hypomyelination, abnormal expression of recognition molecules, and degeneration of myelin and axons. Cell. 1992;4:565–576. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90591-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.García A, Combarros O, Calleja J, Berciano J. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A with 17p duplication in infancy and early childhood: a longitudinal clinical and electrophysiologic study. Neurology. 1998;50:1061–1067. doi: 10.1212/WNL.50.4.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Manganelli F, et al. Nerve conduction velocity in CMT1A: what else can we tell? Eur. J. Neurol. 2016;23:1566–1571. doi: 10.1111/ene.13079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ahmed S, Sami A, Xiang J. HER2-directed therapy: current treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2015;22:101–116. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0587-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Adlkofer K, et al. Hypermyelination and demyelinating peripheral neuropathy in Pmp22-deficient mice. Nat. Genet. 1995;11:274–280. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gurney ME, et al. Motor neuron degeneration in mice that express a human Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase mutation. Science. 1994;264:1772–1775. doi: 10.1126/science.8209258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jung S, Toyka KV, Hartung HP. Soluble complement receptor type 1 inhibits experimental autoimmune neuritis in Lewis rats. Neurosci. Lett. 1995;200:167–170. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)12115-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kadlubowski M, Hughes RA. The neuritogenicity and encephalitogenicity of P2 in the rat, guinea-pig and rabbit. J. Neurol. Sci. 1980;48:171–178. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(80)90198-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Di Cesare Mannelli L, et al. Morphologic features and glial activation in rat oxaliplatin-dependent neuropathic pain. J. Pain. 2013;14:1585–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Soria B, et al. Insulin-secreting cells derived from embryonic stem cells normalize glycemia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Diabetes. 2000;49:157–162. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Meyer OA, Tilson HA, Byrd WC, Riley MT. A method for the routine assessment of fore- and hindlimb grip strength of rats and mice. Neurobehav. Toxicol. 1979;1:233–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jones BJ, Roberts DJ. The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1968;20:302–304. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09743.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Klapdor K, Dulfer BG, Hammann A, Van der Staay FJ. A low-cost method to analyse footprint patterns. J. Neurosci. Methods. 1997;75:49–54. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(97)00042-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1963;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Brockes JP, Fields KL, Raff MC. Studies on cultured rat Schwann cells. I. Establishment of purified populations from cultures of peripheral nerve. Brain Res. 1979;165:105–118. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jones LJ, Gray M, Yue ST, Haugland RP, Singer VL. Sensitive determination of cell number using the CyQUANT cell proliferation assay. J. Immunol. Methods. 2001;254:85–98. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(01)00404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kleitman, N., Wood, P. & Bunge, R. in Culturing Nerve Cells (Goslin, K. & Banker, G.) 545–594 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998) .
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data of the present manuscript are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 1a–d, g, h, 2a, b, d–i, k, 3c–h, k, 4a–g, 5a–f, and 6a–i are available as a Source Data file.