Abstract
Purpose:
fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) is present in 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and these patients have short disease-free survival. FLT3 inhibitors have limited and transient clinical activity, and concurrent treatment with inhibitors of parallel or downstream signaling may improve responses. The oncogenic serine/threonine kinase Pim-1 is upregulated downstream of FLT3-ITD and also promotes its signaling in a positive feedback loop, suggesting benefit of combined Pim and FLT3 inhibition.
Experimental Design:
Combinations of clinically active Pim and FLT3 inhibitors were studied in vitro and in vivo.
Results:
Concurrent treatment with the pan-Pim inhibitor AZD1208 and FLT3 inhibitors at clinically applicable concentrations abrogated in vitro growth of FLT3-ITD, but not wild-type FLT3 (FLT3-WT), cell lines. AZD1208 co-treatment increased FLT3 inhibitor-induced apoptosis of FLT3-ITD, but not FLT3-WT, cells measured by sub-G1 fraction, annexin V labeling, mitochondrial membrane potential and PARP and caspase-3 cleavage. Concurrent treatment with AZD1208 and the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib decreased growth of MV4–11 cells, with FLT3-ITD, in mouse xenografts and prolonged survival, enhanced apoptosis of FLT3-ITD primary AML blasts, but not FLT3-WT blasts or remission marrow cells, and decreased FLT3-ITD AML blast colony formation. Mechanistically, AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1. Decrease in Mcl-1 protein expression was abrogated by treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, and was preceded by downregulation of the Mcl-1 deubiquitinase USP9X, a novel mechanism of Mcl-1 regulation in AML.
Conclusion:
The data support clinical testing of Pim and FLT3 inhibitor combination therapy for FLT3-ITD AML.
Keywords: Pim kinase inhibitor, FLT3 inhibitor, FLT-ITD, Mcl-1, acute myeloid leukemia
Introduction
Internal tandem duplication (ITD) of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells of 30% of patients (1), and these patients have short disease-free survival after chemotherapy (1) and also after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (2). Relapse results at least in part from constitutive growth signaling by FLT3-ITD (3), but FLT3 inhibitors have demonstrated only limited and transient clinical activity (4).
FLT3-ITD activates signal transducer and activation of transcription (STAT) 5 (5), which transcriptionally upregulates the oncogenic serine threonine kinase Pim-1 (6). Pim-1 contributes directly to the proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects of FLT3-ITD (6), and also phosphorylates and stabilizes FLT3, promoting STAT5 signaling in a positive feedback loop in cells with FLT3-ITD (7,8). Pim-1 (7–9) and the Pim kinase isoform Pim-2 (10) have been proposed as therapeutic targets in FLT3-ITD AML. Notably, upregulation of Pim-1 has been shown to be a mechanism of resistance to FLT3 inhibitors (7). Pan-Pim kinase inhibitors have entered clinical trials (11,12).
Here we demonstrate that concurrent treatment with clinically active pan-Pim and FLT3 inhibitors at pharmacologically relevant concentrations enhances induction of apoptosis in cells with FLT3-ITD, but not wild-type FLT3 (FLT3-WT), in vitro and has efficacy in vivo. Mechanistically, concurrent Pim and FLT3 inhibitor treatment increases proteasomal degradation of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1, a novel mechanism. The data support clinical testing of Pim and FLT3 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with FLT3-ITD AML.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines
Ba/F3-ITD, Ba/F3-WT, 32D/ITD, 32D/WT, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells were obtained and cultured as previously described (13). KG-1a human leukemia cells (14), with FLT3-WT, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. MV4–11-luc cells (15) used in the orthotopic in vivo model, gift from Dr. Sharyn Baker, the Ohio State University, formerly St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum and 1% glutamine.
Lentiviral and retroviral infection of Ba/F3-ITD cells
Ba/F3-ITD cells were infected using a pMX-puro retroviral vector encoding FLAG-K67M kinase-dead (KD) Pim-1 (13). They were also transduced with Mcl-1-specific and scrambled shRNA lentiviral particles (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and selected with puromycin (8). Mcl-1 knockdown was confirmed by immunoblotting. Finally, Mcl-1 cDNA (FLAG-tagged) in a pMSCV-puro-Flag-mMcl-1 vector and pMSCVpuro control vector (Addgene, Cambridge, MA) were transfected into Phoenix-AMPHO cells. Ba/F3-ITD cells were transduced with the lentiviral particles collected after 48-hour culture, and transduced cells were selected with puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich). FLAG expression and Mcl-1 overexpression were confirmed by immunoblotting.
AML patient samples
Pre-treatment AML bone marrow and blood and remission bone marrow samples were obtained on a University of Maryland Baltimore Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Written informed consent was obtained. The studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Mononuclear cells isolated by density centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque (Sigma-Aldrich) were studied without prior cryopreservation. FLT-3-ITD and FLT3-WT AML cells from 3 patients each and remission bone marrow cells from 3 patients were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), without cytokine supplementation.
Reagents
AZD1208, an orally bioavailable highly selective inhibitor with single nanomolar potency against all three Pim kinases, Pim-1, Pim-2 and Pim-3 (14), provided by AstraZeneca, was used at 1 μM based on inhibition of BAD phosphorylation at serine 112 as a pharmacodynamic endpoint (16) and on phase I clinical trial data (11). The FLT3 inhibitors quizartinib and crenolanib (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX), sorafenib (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA) and gilteritinib (Active Biochem, Maplewood, NJ), all clinically active in FLT3-ITD AML, were used at pharmacologically relevant concentrations (17–20). The proteasome inhibitor MG132 and the USP9X inhibitor WP1130 were purchased from EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA.
Cytotoxicity assay
Cytotoxicity was measured using the WST-1 assay (13). IC50 values were determined by non-linear curve fitting to a dose-response curve using Prism V software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA).
Cell proliferation assay
Cultured cells were collected at serial time points and live cells were counted after trypan blue dye exclusion (13).
Cell cycle analysis
Percentages of cells in sub-G1 and in different phases of the cell cycle were measured using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) (13).
Measurement of apoptosis by annexin V-PI staining
Cells were stained with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD), acquired on a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using FlowJo (13). Percent total annexin V+/PI− and annexin V+/PI+ cells was compared by two-way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni testing.
Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential
Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) was measured using the MitoProbe™ JC-1 Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) (13). Median red fluorescence was measured on a FACSCanto II, analyzed using FlowJo and compared by 2-way ANOVA.
Cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase and caspase-3 by flow cytometry
Cells treated with drugs with and without the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (Enzo, Farmingdale, NY) were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), resuspended and fixed in 100 μL 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 20 minutes, then washed in 2% FBS in PBS, resuspended in 10% DMSO in FBS and cryopreserved at −80°C. Cells were thawed at 37°C, washed with cold PBS, resuspended and incubated in BD Perm/Wash buffer at room temperature for 15 minutes. They were then pelleted, resuspended in 100 μL BD Perm/Wash buffer containing 10 μL Alexa Fluor 647-labeled anti-Cleaved PARP (Asp 214) antibody (BD Biosciences) and 20 μL FITC-labeled anti-Active Caspase-3 antibody (BD Biosciences), incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes, then washed, resuspended in BD Perm/Wash buffer and acquired on a FACSCanto II. Mean fluorescence was compared by 1-way ANOVA.
Determination of synergy
Cells plated in triplicate on 96-well plates were treated with drugs at various concentrations alone and in combinations. Assays were terminated after 48 hours and combination indexes were determined according to the Chou-Talalay method using CompuSyn software (21).
Immunoblotting
Cells were lysed in buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). Protein concentration was measured using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), and 30 μg from each sample was electrophoresed (8). Immunoblots were incubated with polyclonal antibodies to Pim-1, PARP, Mcl-1, Bim, phospho-BADSer112, BAD, Bax, Bak, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, USP9X, phospho-STAT5Tyr694 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), USP24 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), vinculin and Trim17 (Sigma-Aldrich), SCFβ-TRCP and ARF-BP1 (Abcam) and mouse monoclonal antibodies to β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (EMD Millipore) and FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4°C, then with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for one hour at room temperature. Band intensities at serial time points, measured by densitometry (VisionWorks®LS, UVP, Upland, CA), were compared to pre-treatment intensity, defined as 100%. Measurements of Mcl-1 and USP9X expression in cells treated with inhibitors and combinations were repeated in at least four separate replicate experiments.
in vivo studies
Subcutaneous model
Female CB17 severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and used in compliance with protocols approved by the AstraZeneca Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conforming to institutional and national regulatory standards on experimental animal usage. MV4–11 (10×106) or KG-1a (5×106) cells were implanted with matrigel subcutaneously into the right flanks of the mice. Tumor length and width were measured twice weekly with calipers. When tumor volume, calculated as (length × width2) × 0.5 (22), reached 150–200 mm3, groups of 9 mice were randomly assigned to daily oral gavage with vehicle (22% Captisol), AZD1208 (in 0.5% HPMC/0.1% Tween80), quizartinib (in 22% Captisol) or both, dosed 20 minutes apart. Log-transformed tumor volume fold change from treatment start was compared using a two-tailed student t-test, paired.
Orthotopic model
The orthotopic model was previously described (23). The University of Maryland IACUC approved the study. Mice sorted into 4 treatment groups with equal mean signal intensity, 5 mice in each, were treated by oral gavage with vehicle or AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, as above. They were observed daily and weighed 5 days per week. Leukemia burden was assessed weekly by non-invasive luciferin imaging (23). Initial quizartinib dosing was 1 mg/kg 5 days/week based on the subcutaneous model experiment, but it was then reduced to 0.25 mg/kg 3x/week, with or without AZD1208, based on response.
Colony formation assay
1×104 cells/plate seeded in triplicate in MethoCult H4435 Enriched methylcellulose-based medium (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC) with 100 nM quizartinib and/or 1 μM AZD1208 or DMSO control were incubated for 16 days. Colonies were stained with 1 mg/ml 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenlytetrazolium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 hours, then counted with an automated image analysis system (Omnicon FAS IV, BIOSYS GmbH, Karben, Germany).
Measurement of reactive oxygen species
Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured using the redox-sensitive dye CM-H2DCFDA (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) (13), with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-treated cells as a positive control. Mitochondrial ROS were measured with MitoPY1 fluorescent probe (Tocris, Minneapolis, MN) per manufacturer’s instructions.
Real-time RT-PCR
Cells were stored at −80°C in RNAlater® solution (Life Technologies). RNA isolated using the nucleospin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Bethlehem, PA) was measured using a NanoDrop™ Lite Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). 100 ng RNA from each sample, spiked with 1/10th concentration of an exogenous luciferase vector control, were reverse-transcribed using the SuperScript® First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Mcl-1, GAPDH and luciferase were amplified in triplicate from 2 μl reverse-transcribed RNA using the iQ SYBR® Green supermix in the CFX Connect RT-PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Primer sequences were: Mcl-1 F 5’-AAACTGGGGCAGGATTGTGA-3’, Mcl-1 R 5’-CCAGTCCCGTTTCGTCCTTA-3’, GAPDH F 5’-GAGAGTGTTTCCTCGTCCCG-3’ and GAPDH R 5’-ATGAAGGGGTCGTTGATGGC-3’. Mcl-1 and GAPDH mRNA levels relative to exogenous control were compared to pre-treatment levels, defined as 100%. For analysis of miR-29b expression, extracted total RNA was reverse-transcribed using a TaqMan MicroRNA reverse transcription kit (Life Technologies), with primers specific for miR29b and snoRNA202 as control. miR-29b was measured using the Taqman Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies) on the RT-PCR system. Data were analyzed with the comparative CT method using internal control snoRNA202 RNA levels to normalize differences in sample loading, and graphed with Prism V.
Polysome assay
Cells were lysed in buffer containing 100 μg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich). Nuclei and mitochondria were removed. Supernatants were layered onto 10–50% sucrose gradients and spun at 38,000 rpm for 2 hours at 4°C in an SW 40 rotor (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN). Centrifuged gradients were fractionated into 21 500 μL fractions and the polysome profile was determined via ultraviolet absorbance at 260 nm, followed by RNA extraction, reverse transcription in the presence of an external standard (luciferase vector), and quantification of Mcl-1, GAPDH and luciferase in each fraction by RT-qPCR. Expression of Mcl-1 and GAPDH relative to luciferase was determined in each fraction. Mcl-1 and GAPDH percent in each fraction was then calculated in relation to total Mcl-1 and GAPDH, respectively, in all fractions and plotted in its respective sucrose density fraction.
Results
Pim kinase inhibition enhances FLT3 inhibitor induction of apoptosis of FLT3-ITD cells
The effect of co-treatment with clinically active Pim and FLT3 inhibitors on Ba/F3-ITD and Ba/F3-WT cell growth was studied first. BaF3/ITD cells were treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, sorafenib, crenolanib or gilteritinib at their IC50 concentrations (Supplementary Figure S1), and viable cells were counted at 24, 48 and 72 hours. While treatment of Ba/F3-ITD cells with quizartinib, sorafenib, crenolanib, gilteritinib or, to a lesser extent, AZD1208 decreased viable cell numbers at each time point in relation to DMSO control, co-treatment with AZD1208 and quizartinib, sorafenib, crenolanib or gilteritinib reduced cell numbers, compared to each drug alone (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. Pim kinase inhibition enhances FLT3 inhibitor induction of apoptosis in cells with FLT3-ITD.
A. Combined treatment with Pim and FLT3 inhibitors abrogates growth of Ba/F3-ITD cells. Ba/F3-ITD cells were cultured at 1×105/ml with the Pim kinase inhibitor AZD1208 at 1 μM and/or the FLT3 inhibitors quizartinib at 1 nM, sorafenib at 2.5 nM, crenolanib at 20 nM or gilteritinib at 15 nM, or DMSO control. Cell counts measured at 24, 48 and 72 hours were normalized to 0-hour control. Line graphs represent means ± S.E.M. of triplicate values. B. Pim and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment increases percentages of FLT3-ITD cells in sub-G1 phase. BaF3-ITD cells were cultured with DMSO control or AZD1208 (A) and/or quizartinib (Q), sorafenib (S), crenolanib (G) or gilteritinib (G), as above, and 32D/ITD, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells were cultured with 1 μM AZD1208 (AZD) and/or 1 nM quizartinib (Q), or DMSO control. Cells were collected at serial time points, fixed overnight, and cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative 72-hour data from triplicate experiments are shown. C. AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment increases annexin V labeling of cells with FLT3-ITD. Ba/F3-ITD, 32D/ITD, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells were cultured with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, as above. Cells were stained with annexin V/PI and analyzed by flow cytometry, and percentages of annexin V-positive cells were compared by 2-way ANOVA. Means ± S.E.M. of triplicate values are shown. D. AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment decreases mitochondrial membrane potential in Ba/F3-ITD cells. Ba/F3-ITD cells were cultured as above. Mitochondrial membrane potential was measured by flow cytometry as increased red fluorescence of JC-1 dye and compared by 2-way ANOVA. Means ± S.E.M. of triplicate values are represented in bar graphs. E. AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment increases PARP cleavage in Ba/F3-ITD cells. Ba/F3-ITD cells were cultured as above. Cleaved PARP measured by flow cytometry at 48 hours under the different conditions in triplicate experiments was compared by 1-way ANOVA. F. AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment increases caspase-3 cleavage in Ba/F3-ITD cells. Ba/F3-ITD cells were cultured as above, and cleaved caspase-3 (CASP3) measured by flow cytometry at 48 hours in triplicate experiments in the presence and absence of the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (ZVAD) at 20 μM was compared by 1-way ANOVA. G. AZD1208 and quizartinib are synergistic at the concentrations studied. Ba/F3-ITD cells were treated for 48 hours with of quizartinib (Q) and AZD1208 (A) alone and in combinations at the indicated concentrations, followed by WST-1 assay to determine cytotoxicity (X- axis - fraction of cells affected) and determination of synergy using the Chou-Talalay method (Y-axis - combination index). Means of quadruplicate values are shown.
To understand whether Ba/F3-ITD cell number reduction with Pim and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment was a cytostatic or a cytotoxic effect, cell cycle was analyzed. Co-treatment with AZD1208 and quizartinib, sorafenib, crenolanib or gilteritinib caused accumulation of cells in sub-G1, compared to treatment with each drug alone, with no other changes in cell cycle distribution (Figure 1B). Similar results were seen in 32D/ITD, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 FLT3-ITD cells (Figure 1B).
Induction of apoptosis by AZD1208 and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment was confirmed by increased cell surface phosphatidylserine exposure, measured by annexin V labeling. Ba/F3-ITD, 32D/ITD, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells were cultured with 1 nM quizartinib and/or 1 μM AZD1208 and total annexin V-positive cells were measured by flow cytometry after 48 hours. Annexin V-positive cells increased significantly with quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment, compared to either drug alone (Figure 1C). Annexin V-positive Ba/F3-ITD and 32D/ITD cells also increased significantly with AZD1208 in combination with sorafenib, crenolanib or gilteritinib, as well as quizartinib, in a concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure S2).
AZD1208 and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment reduced the MMP in FLT3-ITD cells, also indicating induction of apoptosis (Figure 1D). Quizartinib alone markedly reduced MMP, and quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment reduced it further, while single-agent AZD1208 had little effect. Sorafenib, crenolanib and gilteritinib did not reduce MMP as single agents, but combination with AZD1208 caused significant MMP decrease (Figure 1D).
Combined treatment with AZD1208 and quizartinib also enhanced PARP and caspase-3 cleavage in Ba/F3-ITD cells. Single-agent quizartinib increased PARP and caspase-3 cleavage slightly, relative to DMSO control, while single-agent AZD1208 had no effect, and quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment produced a marked increase in PARP and caspase-3 cleavage, detected by flow cytometry (Figure 1 E, F). Caspase cleavage was blocked by the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK, highlighting the role of caspase activation in the enhanced apoptosis induced by the combination treatment (Figure 1F).
Synergy between AZD1208 and quizartinib was analyzed according to the Chou-Talalay method (Figure 1G). Combination indexes for 1 nM quizartinib with 1 μM AZD1208 were 0.5, 0.1 and 0.3 in Ba/F3-ITD cells, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 (not shown) cells. Synergy was also seen at other concentration combinations, but 100 nM quizartinib and 1 μM AZD1208 were antagonistic in all three cell lines.
In contrast to findings in cells with FLT3-ITD, co-treatment of Ba/F3-WT cells with AZD1208 and quizartinib at 1 nM or 1 μM, its IC50 concentration in these cells when cultured with 10 ng/ml interleukin-3 (Supplementary Figure S1), produced only minimal additional growth suppression relative to each drug alone (Supplementary Figure S3A). Moreover co-treatment of Ba/F3-WT and/or 32D/WT cells with quizartinib and AZD1208 did not increase sub-G1 cells (Supplementary Figure S3B) or Annexin V labeling (Supplementary Figure S3C) or decrease MMP (Supplementary Figure S3D).
Expression of kinase-dead mutant Pim-1 kinase sensitizes Ba/F3-ITD cells to apoptosis induction by quizartinib
To demonstrate that the enhanced apoptosis seen with AZD1208 in conjunction with FLT3 inhibitors was dependent on inhibition of Pim-1-generated survival signals, induction of apoptosis by FLT3 inhibitor was studied in Ba/F3-ITD cells expressing a Pim-1 kinase-dead mutant with reported dominant-negative activity (13). A highly significant increase in annexin V labeling was seen with quizartinib treatment of Ba/F3-ITD cells ectopically expressing kinase-dead mutant Pim-1, but not empty vector (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Expression of kinase-dead mutant Pim-1 kinase sensitizes Ba/F3-ITD cells to apoptosis induction by quizartinib.
Ba/F3-ITD cells transduced with a pMX-puro retroviral construct containing a FLAG-tagged kinase-defective (KD) K67M mutant Pim-1 or control empty vector were selected with puromycin. Pim-1 expression was measured by immunoblotting (top). Percentages of annexin V-positive cells analyzed by flow cytometry following 48-hour culture with quizartinib or DMSO control were compared by 1-way ANOVA. Means ± S.E.M. of triplicate values are shown. A highly significant increase in annexin V-labeled cells was seen with quizartinib treatment of Ba/F3-ITD cells ectopically expressing kinase-dead mutant Pim-1, but not empty vector.
AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment causes tumor regression in FLT3-ITD in vivo models
The in vitro data prompted us to test whether AZD1208 in combination with quizartinib inhibits growth of cells with FLT3-ITD in vivo and provides a therapeutic anti-tumor benefit.
CB-17 SCID mice engrafted subcutaneously with MV4–11 cells were treated with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, or vehicle control. Quizartinib monotherapy substantially decreased tumor growth, while AZD1208 had no effect, but the quizartinib and AZD1208 combination provided a significant benefit vs. quizartinib (Figure 3A). While all tumors eventually became resistant to treatment with quizartinib and quizartinib and AZD1208, the quizartinib and AZD1208 combination substantially prolonged survival (Figure 3B). In a parallel study in mice engrafted with KG-1a cells, with FLT3-WT, quizartinib did not inhibit tumor growth, AZD1208 monotherapy showed modest inhibition (36% on day 33), and the quizartinib and AZD1208 combination provided no additional benefit (Supplementary Figure S4).
Figure 3. Combined AZD1208 and quizartinib treatment abrogates growth of MV4–11 cells and prolongs survival in subcutaneous and orthotopic in vivo models.
Doses and schedules were based on efficacy in the cell line and tolerability in the mouse models. A. Subcutaneous tumor growth. Mice injected subcutaneously with MV4–11 cells were treated with 30 mg/kg AZD1208 and/or 1 mg/kg quizartinib, or with vehicle control, and tumor volumes measured at serial time points were graphed. Means ± S.E.M. values are shown in the graph on the left, and effects of quizartinib alone or in combination with AZD1208 on individual MV4–11 tumor growth are shown in the graphs on the right. Quizartinib in combination with AZD1208 significantly decreased tumor growth (p<0.04 beginning on Day 22; student t-test, 2-tailed, paired). B. Survival in subcutaneous model. Survival was significantly longer in mice treated with quizartinib in combination with AZD1208, compared to quizartinib alone (p=0.008; student t-test, 2-tailed, paired). Mice treated with vehicle control and with AZD1208 were sacrificed on Day 32. C. Orthotopic model. Mice injected intravenously with MV4–11-luc cells were treated three days per week with 30 mg/kg AZD1208 and/or 0.25 mg/kg quizartinib or vehicle control and imaged at serial time points. D. Photon intensity. Photon intensity means ± S.E.M. versus time are shown graphically. Decreased photon intensity was seen with quizartinib in combination with AZD1208, compared to quizartinib alone (p<0.002; student t-test, 2-tailed, paired). E. Survival in orthotopic model. Survival was significantly longer in mice treated with quizartinib in combination with AZD1208, compared to quizartinib alone (p=0.02; student t-test, 2-tailed, paired).
As in the subcutaneous model, mice injected intravenously with MV4–11 cells also exhibited delayed tumor growth (Figure 3C,D) and prolonged survival (Figure 3E) with AZD1208 and quizartinib compared to quizartinib alone, while AZD1208 alone had no effects. Combination therapy was well tolerated (Supplementary Figure S5).
AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment enhances apoptosis and significantly reduces colony formation in primary patient AML cells with FLT3-ITD, but not FLT3-WT
ex vivo bone marrow or blood blasts from three FLT3-ITD and three FLT3-WT AML patients were treated with quizartinib at a range of concentrations and/or 1 mM AZD1208 for 48 hours, and apoptosis was measured by annexin V labeling. Co-treatment with AZD1208 increased concentration-dependent quizartinib-induced apoptosis in FLT3-ITD, but not FLT3-WT, AML cells (Figure 4A). The degree of increase was variable, possibly reflecting differences in FLT3-ITD allelic ratios (.66, .21 and .29 in Patients 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Bone marrow mononuclear cells from three patients in remission also did not show increased apoptosis with AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment (Figure 4A).
Figure 4.
A. Combined AZD1208 and quizartinib treatment increases apoptosis in FLT3-ITD AML patient blasts, but not FLT3-WT AML patient blasts or remission marrow cells. Bone marrow or blood blasts from AML patients with FLT3-ITD (top panels) or FLT3-WT (middle panels) and bone marrow mononuclear cells from patients in remission (bottom panels) were treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or quizartinib at increasing concentrations. Percentages of cells labeled with annexin V at 48 hours were measured by flow cytometry and compared by 2-way ANOVA. Means + S.E.M. of triplicate experiments are shown. B. Combined AZD1208 and quizartinib treatment reduces FLT3-ITD blast colony formation. Blasts from Patient 1, with FLT3-ITD, and Patient 4, with FLT3-WT, were seeded in methylcellulose with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or 100 nM quizartinib or DMSO control and incubated for 16 days. Colonies were counted following 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenlytetrazolium chloride staining for 48 hours. Data were normalized to those from DMSO-treated cells and compared by 1-way ANOVA. Means ± S.E.M of triplicate experiments are shown.
The effect of treatment with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib on colony formation by bone marrow blasts from patients with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-WT AML was also studied. AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment markedly decreased colony formation by FLT3-ITD AML cells, in relation to each drug alone, but had a much smaller effect on FLT3-WT AML cells (Figure 4B).
AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment does not increase cellular ROS generation, but increases mitochondrial ROS generation
We previously demonstrated that Pim inhibition sensitizes cells with FLT3-ITD, but not FLT3-WT, to induction of apoptosis by topoisomerase inhibitors via enhanced induction of cellular ROS (18). We therefore measured cellular ROS at serial time points in Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with 1 nM quizartinib and/or 1 μM AZD1208, DMSO control or H2O2 control. Increased cellular ROS generation was not seen with quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment (Supplementary Figure S6A). We also then measured mitochondrial ROS production, which was previously shown to increase with quizartinib treatment of cells with FLT3-ITD in a concentration-dependent manner (24). The combination of quizartinib at 1 nM and 1 μM AZD1208 increased mitochondrial ROS generation, in relation to quizartinib alone (Supplementary Figure S6B).
AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment downregulates Mcl-1 protein
We next sought to elucidate the mechanism underlying enhanced apoptosis with Pim and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment. Expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins Mcl-1, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL and the pro-apoptotic proteins BAD/p-BADS112, BAK, BAX and Bim was measured by immunoblotting at serial time points in Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with quizartinib and/or AZD1208. Mcl-1 expression decreased in a time-dependent manner with quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment, relative to quizartinib alone (Figure 5A), confirmed by densitometry (Figure 5D), while levels of the other proteins did not change significantly with combination treatment, relative to quizartinib (Figure 5A). Of note, Bim expression increased markedly, but the increase was equal with quizartinib and AZD1208 and with quizartinib alone. Moreover phospho-BADSer112 decreased with AZD1208 treatment, but not with quizartinib or with quizartinib and AZD1208. Additionally, phospho-STAT5 decreased similarly with quizartinib and AZD1208 as with quizartinib alone (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Apoptosis induction by AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment is associated with post-transcriptional downregulation of Mcl-1 protein expression.
A. Expression of pro-apoptotic and pro-survival proteins at serial time points, showing Mcl-1 downregulation by co-treatment. Expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins in Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or 1 nM quizartinib, or DMSO control for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours was measured by immunoblotting. B. Expression of p-STAT5 at serial time points, showing similar decrease with combination and quizartinib. Expression of p-STAT5 in BaF3-ITD cells treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or 1 nM quizartinib, or DMSO control, for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours was measured by immunoblotting. C. Mcl-1 gene knockdown accelerates apoptosis induction by AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment. Mcl-1 gene expression was knocked down in Ba/F3-ITD cells by shRNA (top). Cells were then treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or 1 nM quizartinib, or DMSO control, for 24 hours, labeled with annexin V/PI and analyzed by flow cytometry. Percentages of annexin V-positive cells were compared by 2-way ANOVA. Means ± S.E.M. of triplicate values are shown. D. Downregulation of Mcl-1 expression by AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment is post-transcriptional. Mcl-1 mRNA levels (left) were measured at serial time points in conjunction with protein levels (right) and normalized to GAPDH expression in Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, or DMSO control. E. Mcl-1 overexpression does not inhibit Mcl-1 downregulation by co-treatment, consistent with post-translational downregulation. Expression of Mcl-1 and vinculin, as a loading control, was measured by immunoblotting at serial time points in Ba/F3-ITD cells expressing Mcl-1 cDNA (FLAG-tagged) in a pMSCV-puro-Flag-mMcl-1 vector (right) and pMSCVpuro control vector (center) co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208. FLAG expression and Mcl-1 overexpression were confirmed by immunoblotting (right). F. Mcl-1 overexpression does not inhibit apoptosis induction by co-treatment. Annexin-V labeling was measured on Ba/F3-ITD cells expressing Mcl-1 cDNA (FLAG-tagged) in a pMSCV-puro-Flag-mMcl-1 vector (right) and pMSCVpuro control vector (center) co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208 for 48 hours.
To further study the role of Mcl-1 in the response to AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment, apoptosis induction was studied in Ba/F3-ITD cells with Mcl-1 knocked down with targeted shRNA. Depletion of Mcl-1 markedly increased apoptosis induction by AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment at 24 hours (Figure 5C), while a smaller effect was seen with quizartinib alone and no effect was seen with AZD1208 alone.
AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment reduces Mcl-1 protein levels post-translationally
We next sought to determine the mechanism(s) by which AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment downregulates Mcl-1 expression. We first measured Mcl-1 mRNA in conjunction with protein. While Mcl-1 protein levels decreased in AZD1208 and quizartinib-co-treated cells, Mcl-1 mRNA levels did not change relative to GAPDH (Figure 5D) or to an exogenous luciferase vector control (not shown). Therefore Mcl-1 downregulation by AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment occurs at a post-transcriptional level.
Since miR-29b is a negative regulator of Mcl-1 translation (25), we determined whether miR-29b levels were altered in Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with AZD1208 and quizartinib, compared to quizartinib alone, using RT-qPCR. miR-29b levels decreased with quizartinib treatment alone and decreased similarly with combination treatment (Supplementary Figure S7A), indicating that miR-29b is not driving the effect of the combination treatment on Mcl-1 protein expression.
Next, we tested the effect of AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment on Mcl-1 translation by analyzing the polysome profile from Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib for 24 hours. The polysomal RNA (P) to uninitiated/untranslated (U) RNA ratio was lower with co-treatment, compared to single-drug or DMSO control treatment, indicating decreased total mRNA translation. However RT-qPCR analysis showed decreased association of GAPDH, but not Mcl-1, mRNA with polysomes upon co-treatment, indicating that Mcl-1 translation is not selectively reduced (Supplementary Figure S7B).
Additionally, Mcl-1 overexpression in Ba/F3-ITD cells did not abrogate Mcl-1 downregulation (Figure 5E) nor induction of apoptosis (Figure 5F) by quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment, which is also consistent with a post-translational effect of quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment on Mcl-1 expression.
Mcl-1 protein expression is downregulated via enhanced Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation
We then investigated whether quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment causes increased Mcl-1 protein proteasomal degradation. To test this, we analyzed Mcl-1 protein expression in Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or 1 nM quizartinib in the absence and presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. The progressive decrease in Mcl-1 protein expression at 4 and 8 hours of quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment was rescued by addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Figure 6A). This finding is consistent with enhanced Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation as the mechanism for Mcl-1 protein downregulation upon AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment. Expression of the deubiquitinase ubiquitin-specific peptidase 9 X-linked (USP9X), which plays a prominent role in controlling Mcl-1 degradation by the proteasome (26), also decreased with quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment, and the decrease was also rescued by MG132.
Figure 6. Mechanism of post-translational Mcl-1 downregulation in FLT3-ITD cells co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208.
A. Proteasome inhibition abrogates Mcl-1 downregulation by AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment. Ba/F3-ITD cells treated with 1 μM AZD1208 and/or 1 nM quizartinib (A, Q, QA), or DMSO control (D), were studied for Mcl-1 expression at serial time points in the presence and absence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (20 μM), added 30 minutes before drug treatment. The Mcl-1 deubiquitinase USP9X is also shown, also demonstrating downregulation by proteasomal degradation. B. Expression of the Mcl-1 deubiquitinase USP9X decreases prior to the decrease in Mcl-1 expression in Ba/F3-ITD cells co-treated with AZD1208 and quizartinib. Expression of USP9X and Mcl-1 in Ba/F3-ITD cells co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208 was measured by immunoblotting. In contrast, expression of the Mcl-1 deubiquitinase USP24 and the ubiquitin E3 ligases ARF-BP1, SCFβ-TRCP and Trim17 did not change. C. AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment downregulates Mcl-1 in MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells, preceded by USP9X downregulation. Serial expression of Mcl-1 and USP9X protein is shown in cells treated with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, or DMSO control. D. Proteasome inhibition abrogates Mcl-1 downregulation in MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208. Mcl-1 and USP9X expression was measured at serial time points in MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208 in the absence and presence of MG132. Mcl-1 downregulation was preceded by USP9X downregulation in the absence of MG132, but neither was downregulated in the presence of MG132. E. Quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment of MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells does not decrease p-STAT5 or p-BAD, in relation to each drug alone. p-STAT5 and p-BADS112 expression is shown in MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells treated with AZD1208 and/or quizartinib, or DMSO control. F. Treatment with the USP9X inhibitor WP1130 induces apoptosis of Ba/F3-ITD and MV4–11 cells. Ba/F3-ITD and MV4–11 cells were treated in triplicate with WP1130 in increasing concentrations and Annexin V labeling was measured by flow cytometry, demonstrating concentration-dependent induction of apoptosis. G. Treatment with the USP9X inhibitor WP1130 decreases Mcl-1 expression in Ba/F3-ITD and MV4–11 cells. WP1130 at 4 μM, a concentration that induced apoptosis, downregulated Mcl-1 expression in both cell lines.
We then determined the timing of the decrease in USP9X and Mcl-1 expression with quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment. Ba/F3-ITD cells were treated with 1 nM quizartinib and/or 1 μM AZD1208, harvested at serial time points and analyzed by immunoblotting. USP9X protein levels initially decreased after 3 hours of treatment with quizartinib and AZD1208 (Figure 6B), but not with either drug alone or with DMSO control (not shown), and the decrease in USP9X protein level preceded the decrease in Mcl-1 protein level. In contrast, expression of the deubiquitinase USP24, an additional regulator of Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation (27), was not altered by co-treatment with quizartinib and AZD1208 (Figure 6B). Additionally, no changes in expression of the ubiquitin E3 ligases ARF-BP1, SCFβ-TRCP and Trim17 preceded Mcl-1 downregulation (Figure 6B).
To confirm that post-translational Mcl-1 protein downregulation is a consistent finding with AZD1208 and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment of cells with FLT3-ITD, the FLT3-ITD human AML cell lines MV4–11 and MOLM-14 were studied. Consistent with the findings in Ba/F3-ITD cells, MV4–11 and MOLM-14 cells co-treated with AZD1208 and quizartinib showed reduced Mcl-1 protein levels, and decreased USP9X expression preceded decreased Mcl-1 expression (Figure 6C). Moreover, the decrease in Mcl-1 expression was abrogated by treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Figure 6D), consistent with decrease via proteasomal degradation. Finally, as in Ba/F3-ITD cells, the effect of quizartinib and AZD1208 combination therapy was not attributable to greater decreases in phospho-STAT5 or phospho-BAD (Figure 6E).
Treatment with the USP9X inhibitor WP1130 induced apoptosis of Ba/F3-ITD cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 6F), consistent with USP9X as a mediator of apoptosis induction by concurrent Pim and FLT3 inhibition. Downregulation of Mcl-1 expression by WP1130 at a concentration that induced apoptosis was also demonstrated (Figure 6G). Finally, WP1130 enhanced induction of apoptosis of Ba/F3-ITD and MV4–11 cells by quizartinib in a concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure S8).
Discussion
FLT3-ITD is present in AML cells in 30% of patients (1) and these patients have short disease-free survival following chemotherapy (1) and following transplant (2). FLT3 inhibitors have limited and transient clinical activity (4), and responses might be augmented by combining them with inhibitors of parallel or downstream signaling. The oncogenic pro-survival kinase Pim-1 is overexpressed downstream of FLT3-ITD (6) and also promotes FLT3-ITD signaling in a positive feedback loop (7,8). We demonstrate here that Pim inhibition enhances apoptosis induction by the clinically active FLT3 inhibitors quizartinib, sorafenib, crenolanib and gilteritinib in FLT3-ITD cell lines in vitro and in vivo and in FLT3-ITD AML patient samples, and that this effect is associated with reduction in Mcl-1 protein levels resulting from increased Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation.
We used the Pim inhibitor AZD1208 to test the effect of Pim kinase inhibition in combination with FLT3 inhibition. AZD1208 was the first selective pan-Pim inhibitor tested clinically in AML, based on preclinical activity (14). It was well tolerated and clinically active in a phase I trial in AML patients (11), but was withdrawn from clinical studies due to highly variable pharmacokinetics and time-dependent decrease in exposure in patients, despite favorable pharmacokinetics in mice. The pan-Pim inhibitors PIM447 (formerly LGH447) (12) and INCB053914 (28) are currently in clinical trials, and we have also shown in vitro efficacy of PIM447 in conjunction with FLT3 inhibitors in abrogating growth and enhancing apoptosis of cells with FLT3-ITD (29).
Single-agent AZD1208 did not induce apoptosis of FLT3-ITD cells, nor of the FLT3-WT cells that we studied. Similarly, Keeton et al. found that, among 14 AML cell lines including MV4–11 and MOLM13 with FLT3-ITD, AZD1208 only induced apoptosis of MOLM16 cells (14), with FLT3-WT but rearrangement of the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Tyk2 (30). In contrast, the Pim-1/Pim-3 inhibitor SGI-1776 induced apoptosis in the FLT3-ITD cell lines MV4–11 and MOLM-13 (31), but also inhibits FLT3, and apoptosis was likely due to concurrent FLT3 inhibition (32).
Increased apoptosis induction with AZD1208 and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment was not associated with enhanced effects on phospho-STAT5 or phospho-BAD, but rather was associated with downregulation of Mcl-1, previously identified as an important target in FLT3-ITD AML. AML cells and stem cells with FLT3-ITD express high levels of Mcl-1, and Mcl-1 depletion by shRNA induces apoptosis, while Mcl-1 overexpression promotes cell survival (33,34). Moreover, the Pim-1 and FLT3 inhibitor SGI-1776 induced apoptosis of FLT3-ITD AML cells by downregulating Mcl-1 expression (31).
Mechanistically, AZD1208 and quizartinib co-treatment decreased Mcl-1 protein levels through enhanced proteasome-dependent Mcl-1 degradation. The Pim-1 and FLT3 inhibitor SGI-1776 also induced apoptosis of FLT3-ITD AML cells by downregulating Mcl-1 expression, as noted above, but Mcl-1 downregulation occurred via decreased Mcl-1 transcription and translation (31). Enhanced proteasomal degradation is a novel mechanism of Mcl-1 downregulation in FLT3-ITD cells.
Treatment of FLT3-ITD cells with AZD1208 alone did not affect Mcl-1 protein levels. Pim phosphorylation protects a number of substrate proteins from proteasomal degradation (35–37), but Mcl-1 is not a known Pim-1 substrate. In contrast, the Pim inhibitor SMI-4a downregulated Mcl-1 in prostate cancer cells via both globally decreased translation and increased Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation (38). Differential effects of AZD1208 and SMI-4a on Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation might reflect different effects on proteins regulating Mcl-1 degradation, rather than direct effects on Mcl-1.
Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation is regulated by GSK3 phosphorylation, and, in different tissues, by the ubiquitin E3 ligases Mule/ARF-BP1, SCFβ-TrCP, SCFFbw7 and, in neurons, Trim17, which promote its degradation (39), and the deubiquitinases USP9X (26) and USP24 (26), which protect it from degradation. We demonstrated time-dependent downregulation of USP9X in Ba/F3-ITD cells co-treated with quizartinib and AZD1208, preceding the reduction in Mcl-1 protein levels, while Mule/ARF-BP1, SCFβ-TrCP, Trim17 and USP24 levels did not change. These data suggest that USP9X downregulation plays a key role in the increase in Mcl-1 proteasomal degradation induced by concurrent Pim and FLT3 inhibition. We also demonstrated that treatment of Ba/F3-ITD cells with the USP9X inhibitor WP1130 decreased Mcl-1 protein levels and induced apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner, reproducing the effect of concurrent Pim and FLT3 inhibition. Of note, USP9X is increasingly recognized as a therapeutic target in diverse malignancies (26,40–44), but, to our knowledge, has not been previously studied in AML.
There are several explanations for the efficacy of Pim and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment in cells with FLT3-ITD, but not FLT3-WT. First, Pim-1 is upregulated downstream of FLT3-ITD and is an important mediator (6) and potentiator (7,8) of FLT3-ITD signaling. Secondly, FLT3 inhibitors more potently induce apoptosis in cells with FLT3-ITD, and apoptosis is therefore likely potentiated more effectively. Thirdly, we found that AZD1208 and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment downregulates Mcl-1 expression and, as discussed above, Mcl-1 is an important target in FLT3-ITD AML (31,33,34).
Pim inhibition sensitizes FLT3-ITD cells to apoptosis induction by FLT3 inhibitors and by topoisomerase inhibitor chemotherapy drugs by different mechanisms. We previously demonstrated that Pim inhibition sensitizes cells with FLT3-ITD, but not FLT3-WT, to induction of apoptosis by topoisomerase inhibitors via enhanced induction of cellular ROS and increased DNA damage, without effect on expression of Mcl-1 or other anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic proteins (13). Here we found that co-treatment with Pim and FLT3 inhibitors did not induce cellular ROS, but downregulated Mcl-1 expression. Topoisomerase inhibitors induce cellular ROS and DNA damage by themselves (13), while FLT3 inhibitors do not induce cellular ROS, but downregulate Mcl-1 expression in FLT3-ITD cells (33,34). Of note, we did find increased induction of mitochondrial ROS with quizartinib and AZD1208 co-treatment as a contributor to apoptosis (24). Pim inhibition appears to enhance apoptosis via the mechanism associated with its partner drug. A similar phenomenon was reported in combination with the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-737 (38).
Our in vitro and in vivo data support clinical testing of concurrent treatment with Pim and FLT3 inhibitors in patients with FLT3-ITD AML, and, as noted above, we recently reproduced the in vitro findings reported here with PIM447 (29), which has undergone successful clinical testing (12). Of note, Pim inhibitors have been well tolerated in clinical trials to date (11,12), as have FLT3 inhibitors (4,17,19,20), and they have not had overlapping toxicities. As with effective BCR-ABL inhibition in chronic myelogenous leukemia, enhanced cytotoxicity of FLT3 inhibitors in conjunction with a Pim inhibitor may reduce induction of FLT3 point mutations conferring resistance to FLT3 inhibitors (45). Pim expression also increases at relapse following FLT3 inhibitor therapy (7), and Pim inhibitors may abrogate the effects of Pim upregulation. Finally, as enhanced apoptosis is specific for FLT3-ITD cells and, in particular, was not seen in remission bone marrow cells, a favorable therapeutic index is expected for concurrent FLT3 and Pim kinase inhibitor therapy in AML with FLT3-ITD, in relation to effects on normal hematopoietic cells.
Supplementary Material
Statement of Translational Relevance.
Internal tandem duplication of the fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor 3 receptor tyrosine kinase (FLT3-ITD) is present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells of 30% of patients, and these patients have short disease-free survival following therapy. The oncogenic serine/threonine kinase Pim-1, upregulated downstream of FLT3-ITD, contributes directly to the proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects of FLT3-ITD and also phosphorylates and stabilizes FLT3 and thereby promotes its signaling in a positive feedback loop in cells with FLT3-ITD, suggesting benefit of combined Pim and FLT3 inhibition. We demonstrate that Pim inhibition enhances FLT3-ITD AML cell apoptosis induction by clinically applicable FLT3 inhibitors and that combination therapy has efficacy in in vivo models of FLT3-ITD AML. Mechanistically, Pim and FLT3 inhibitor co-treatment increases proteasome-dependent degradation of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1, a novel mechanism of Mcl-1 regulation in AML cells. The data support clinical testing of Pim and FLT3 inhibitor combination therapy for FLT3-ITD AML.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Francis D Gibbons, PhD, Principal Scientist, Oncology IMED, AstraZeneca, for providing AZD1208 pharmacokinetic data and the UMGCCC Flow Cytometry Shared Service for consultation and assistance.
Financial support: Funded by a Merit Review grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs (M.R.B.), Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Translational Research Awards (M.R.B., E.D.), NIH-NCI grants RO1 CA163800 (D.P.) and P30 CA134274 and by University of Maryland, Baltimore UMMG Cancer Research Grant #CH 649 CRF issued by the State of Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) under the Cigarette Restitution Fund Program, and the Valanda Wilson Leukemia Research Fund.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement: Adriana E. Tron is an employee of Astra Zeneca. Manfred Kraus, and Dennis Huszar were previously employees of Astra Zeneca. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
- 1.Patel JP, Gönen M, Figueroa ME, Fernandez H, Sun Z, Racevskis J, et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1079–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Song Y, Magenau J, Li Y, Braun T, Chang L, Bixby D, et al. FLT3 mutational status is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after allogeneic transplantation in AML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016;51:511–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kiyoi H, Ohno R, Ueda R, Saito H, Naoe T. Mechanism of constitutive activation of FLT3 with internal tandem duplication in the juxtamembrane domain. Oncogene 2002;21:2555–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Larrosa-Garcia M, Baer MR. FLT3 Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Status and Future Directions. Mol Cancer Ther 2017;16:991–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Spiekermann K, Bagrintseva K, Schwab R, Schmieja K, Hiddemann W. Overexpression and constitutive activation of FLT3 induces STAT5 activation in primary acute myeloid leukemia blast cells. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2140–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim KT, Baird K, Ahn JY, Meltzer P, Lilly M, Levis M, et al. Pim-1 is up-regulated by constitutively activated FLT3 and plays a role in FLT3-mediated cell survival. Blood 2005;105:1759–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Green AS, Maciel TT, Hospital M-A, Yin C, Mazed F, Townsend EC, et al. Pim kinases modulate resistance to FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Adv 2015;1:e1500221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Natarajan K, Xie Y, Burcu M, Linn DE, Qiu Y, Baer MR. Pim-1 kinase phosphorylates and stabilizes 130 kDa FLT3 and promotes aberrant STAT5 signaling in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3 internal tandem duplication. PLoS One 2013;8:e74653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fathi AT, Arowojolu O, Swinnen I, Sato T, Rajkhowa T, Small D, et al. A potential therapeutic target for FLT3-ITD AML: PIM1 kinase. Leuk Res 2012;36:224–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adam M, Pogacic V, Bendit M, Chappuis R, Nawijn MC, Duyster J, et al. Targeting PIM kinases impairs survival of hematopoietic cells transformed by kinase inhibitor-sensitive and kinase inhibitor-resistant forms of Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 and BCR/ABL. Cancer Res 2006;66:3828–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McEachern KA, Cao Y, DuPont R, Pablo L, McCoon P, Cortes JE, et al. AZD1208 PIM kinase inhibitor - Preliminary evidence of target pathway inhibition in Phase I clinical trials of AML. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2013;73:3516 (Abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Raab MS, Ocio EM, Thomas SK, Günther A, Goh Y-T, Lebovic D, et al. Phase 1 study update of the novel pan-Pim kinase inhibitor LGH447 in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2014;124:301 (Abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Doshi KA, Trotta R, Natarajan K, Rassool FV, Tron AE, Huszar D, et al. Pim kinase inhibition sensitizes FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia cells to topoisomerase 2 inhibitors through increased DNA damage and oxidative stress. Oncotarget 2016;7:48280–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Keeton EK, McEachern K, Dillman KS, Palakurthi S, Cao Y, Grondine MR, et al. AZD1208, a potent and selective pan-Pim kinase inhibitor, demonstrates efficacy in preclinical models of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2014;123:905–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zimmerman EI, Turner DC, Buaboonnam J, Hu S, Orwick S, Roberts MS, et al. Crenolanib is active against models of drug-resistant FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2013;122:3607–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim KT, Levis M, Small D. Constitutively active FLT3 phosphorylates BAD partially through pim-1. Br J Haematol 2006;134:500–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, Foran JM, Ghirdaladze D, Zodelava M, Borthakur G, et al. Phase I study of quizartinib administered daily to patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia irrespective of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication status. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3681–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smith CC, Lasater EA, Lin KC, Wang Q, McCreery MQ, Stewart WK, et al. Crenolanib is a selective type I pan-FLT3 inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:5319–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Man CH, Fung TK, Ho C, Han HH, Chow HC, Ma AC, et al. Sorafenib treatment of FLT3-ITD(+) acute myeloid leukemia: favorable initial outcome and mechanisms of subsequent nonresponsiveness associated with the emergence of a D835 mutation. Blood 2012;119:5133–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Perl AE, Altman JK, Cortes J, Smith C, Litzow M, Baer MR, et al. Selective inhibition of FLT3 by gilteritinib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, phase 1–2 study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1061–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chou TC. Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. Cancer Res 2010;70:440–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Euhus DM, Hudd C, LaRegina MC, Johnson FE. Tumor measurement in the nude mouse. J Surg Oncol 1986;31:229–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Muvarak NE, Chowdhury K, Xia L, Robert C, Choi EY, Cai Y, et al. Enhancing the cytotoxic effects of PARP inhibitors with DNA demethylating agents – a potential therapy for cancer. Cancer Cell 2016;30:637–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gregory MA, D’Alessandro A, Alvarez-Calderon F, Kim J, Nemkov T, Adane B, et al. ATM/G6PD-driven redox metabolism promotes FLT3 inhibitor resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:E6669–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mott JL, Kobayashi S, Bronk SF, Gores GJ. mir-29 regulates Mcl-1 protein expression and apoptosis. Oncogene 2007;26:6133–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schwickart M, Huang X, Lill JR, Liu J, Ferrando R, French DM, et al. Deubiquitinase USP9X stabilizes MCL1 and promotes tumour cell survival. Nature 2010;463:103–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Peterson LF, Sun H, Liu Y, Potu H, Kandarpa M, Ermann M, et al. Targeting deubiquitinase activity with a novel small-molecule inhibitor as therapy for B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2015;125:3588–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koblish H, Shin N, Hall L, O’Connor S, Wang Q, Wang K, et al. Activity of the pan-PIM kinase inhibitor INCB053914 in models of acute myelogenous leukemia. Cancer Res 2015;75: 5416 (Abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Doshi KA, Baldwin PR, Kapoor S, Baer MR. The clinically applicable pan-Pim kinase inhibitor PIM447 sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia cells with FLT3-ITD to apoptosis induction by FLT3 inhibitors and by topoisomerase 2 inhibitors. Cancer Res 2016;76:3866 (Abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tron AE, Keeton EK, Ye M, Casas-Selves M, Chen H, Dillman KS, et al. Next-generation sequencing identifies a novel ELAVL1-TYK2 fusion gene in MOLM-16, an AML cell line highly sensitive to the PIM kinase inhibitor AZD1208. Leuk Lymphoma 2016;57:2927–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen LS, Redkar S, Taverna P, Cortes JE, Gandhi V. Mechanisms of cytotoxicity to Pim kinase inhibitor, SGI-1776, in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011;118:693–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hospital MA, Green AS, Lacombe C, Mayeux P, Bouscary D, Tamburini J. The FLT3 and Pim kinases inhibitor SGI-1776 preferentially target FLT3-ITD AML cells. Blood 2012;119:1791–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yoshimoto G, Miyamoto T, Jabbarzadeh-Tabrizi S, Iino T, Rocnik JL, Kikushige Y, et al. FLT3-ITD up-regulates MCL-1 to promote survival of stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia via FLT3-ITD-specific STAT5 activation. Blood 2009;114:5034–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kasper S, Breitenbuecher F, Heidel F, Hoffarth S, Markova B, Schuler M, et al. Targeting MCL-1 sensitizes FLT3-ITD-positive leukemias to cytotoxic therapies. Blood Cancer J 2012;2:e60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen XP, Losman JA, Cowan S, Donahue E, Fay S, Vuong BQ, et al. Pim serine/threonine kinases regulate the stability of Socs-1 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:2175–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang Y, Wang Z, Li X, Magnuson NS. Pim kinase-dependent inhibition of c-Myc degradation. Oncogene 2008;27:4809–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xie Y, Burcu M, Linn DE, Qiu Y, Baer MR. Pim-1 kinase protects P-glycoprotein from degradation and enables its glycosylation and cell surface expression. Mol Pharmacol 2010;78:310–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Song JH, Kraft AS. Pim kinase inhibitors sensitize prostate cancer cells to apoptosis triggered by Bcl-2 family inhibitor ABT-737. Cancer Res 2012;72:294–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mojsa B, Lassot I, Desagher S. Mcl-1 ubiquitination: unique regulation of an essential survival protein. Cells 2014;3:418–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sun H, Kapuria V, Peterson LF, Fang D, Bornmann WG, Bartholomeusz G, et al. Bcr-Abl ubiquitination and Usp9x inhibition block kinase signaling and promote CML cell apoptosis. Blood 2011;117:3151–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Peterson LF, Sun H, Liu Y, Potu H, Kandarpa M, Ermann M, et al. Targeting deubiquitinase activity with a novel small-molecule inhibitor as therapy for B-cell malignancies. Blood 2015;125:3588–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kushwaha D, O’Leary C, Cron KR, Deraska P, Zhu K, D’Andrea AD, et al. USP9X inhibition promotes radiation-induced apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cells expressing mid-to-high MCL1. Cancer Biol Ther 2015;16:392–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Karpel-Massler G, Banu MA, Shu C, Halatsch ME, Westhoff MA, Bruce JN, et al. Inhibition of deubiquitinases primes glioblastoma cells to apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 2016;7:12791–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Potu H, Peterson LF, Kandarpa M, Pal A, Sun H, Durham A, et al. Usp9x regulates Ets-1 ubiquitination and stability to control NRAS expression and tumorigenicity in melanoma. Nat Commun 2017;8:14449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Smith CC, Wang Q, Chin CS, Salerno S, Damon LE, Levis MJ, et al. Validation of ITD mutations in FLT3 as a therapeutic target in human acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2012;485:260–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.