Skip to main content
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry logoLink to Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
letter
. 2019 Mar 28;15:795–800. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.15.76

A diastereoselective approach to axially chiral biaryls via electrochemically enabled cyclization cascade

Hong Yan 1, Zhong-Yi Mao 1, Zhong-Wei Hou 1, Jinshuai Song 2, Hai-Chao Xu 1,
Editor: Tehshik P Yoon
PMCID: PMC6444422  PMID: 30992728

Abstract

A diastereoselective approach to axially chiral imidazopyridine-containing biaryls has been developed. The reactions proceed through a radical cyclization cascade to construct the biaryls with good to excellent central-to-axial chirality transfer.

Keywords: axial chirality, biaryl, electrochemistry, oxidation, radical

Introduction

Axially chiral biaryls are prevalent in natural products, bioactive molecules and organocatalysts [12]. Among the many methods that have been developed for the synthesis of chiral biaryls [310], reactions that take avantage of the central-to-axial chirality transfer have been less explored [1114]. In addition, an antroposelective synthesis of imidazopyridine-based biaryls has not been reported.

Nitrogen-centered radicals (NCRs) are attractive reactive intermediates for organic synthesis as they provide opportunities for the efficient construction of C–N bonds [1519]. Recently, the generation of NCRs through electron transfer-based methods has been attracting attention. Organic electrochemistry is a powerful tool for adding or taking electrons from organic molecules to promote redox reactions because of its reagent-free feature and the tunability of electric current and potential [2030]. We [3134] and others [3541] have studied the reactions of electrochemically generated NCRs. Particularly, we have recently reported an electrochemical synthesis of imidazo-fused N-heteroaromatic compounds via a radical cyclization cascade [31]. Building on this work, we report herein an atroposelective synthesis of imidazopyridine-containing biaryls via central-to-axial chirality transfer (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Reaction design.

Results and Discussion

The substituents on the phenyl ring (R1) and at the propargylic position (R2) of carbamate 2 were varied to study their effects on the diastereoselectivity (Table 1). The electrolysis was conducted under previously established conditions employing a three-necked round-bottomed flask as the cell, a reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) anode and a platinum plate cathode [31]. The reaction was carried in refluxing MeCN/H2O (9:1) with tetraarylhydrazine 1 as the redox catalyst, NaHCO3 (2 equiv) as an additive, and Et4NBF4 (1 equiv) as the supporting electrolyte. These investigations indicated that bulky tertiary groups at both R1 and R2 positions were needed to ensure efficient chirality transfer. Hence, carbamate 2a (Table 1, entry 1) bearing a t-Bu group at R1 and R2 positions, respectively, reacted to give imidazopyridine-based biaryl 3a in 68% yield with good diastereoselectivity (14:1 dr). Replacing the t-Bu group at the propargylic position with iPr (Table 1, entry 2) or on the phenyl ring with Ph (Table 1, entry 3) or OiPr (Table 1, entry 4) all resulted in low diastereoselectivity (2:1 to 3:1).

Table 1.

Investigation on the effects of substituents on the diastereoselectivity.a

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-15-795-i001.jpg

Entry Substrate Product, yield,b drc

1 2a (R1 = t-Bu, R2 = t-Bu) (±)-3a, 68%, 14:1 dr
2 2b (R1 = t-Bu, R2 = iPr) (±)-3b, 64%, 3:1 dr
3 2c (R1 = Ph, R2 = t-Bu) (±)-3c, 73%, 2:1 dr
4 2d (R1 = OiPr, R2 = t-Bu) (±)-3d, 78%, 3:1 dr

aReaction conditions: undivided cell, 1 (0.03 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol), H2O (1 mL), MeCN (9 mL), 3.5 F mol−1. bIsolated yield. cDetermined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.

The scope of the electrosynthesis was investigated by varying the peripheral substituents of the carbamate substrate 2 (Scheme 2). The pyridyl ring could be substituted at positions 4, 5 and 6 with a range of substituents with diverse electronic properties such as OMe (3e), Br (3f), CF3 (3g), CN (3h), Cl (3i), and Me (3j). Pyridyl rings bearing multiple substituents were also tolerated (3k and 3l). The stereochemistry of the biaryl product was determined by obtaining an X-ray crystal structure of 3k. The t-Bu-substituted phenyl ring on the alkyne moiety containing an extra OMe (3m) or Me (3n and 3o) group was tolerated albeit with reduced diastereoselectivity. The t-Bu group on the phenyl ring and at the propargylic position could be replaced with other bulky tertiary substituents to afford a range of functionalized biaryl products (3pw). The electrochemical conditions were compatible with several functional groups including aryltrimethylsilane (3p), silyl ether (3qs), ester (3t) and cylic ketal (3u). Note that all the diastereomers were separable by flash column chromatography.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Scope of electrochemical synthesis of axially chiral biaryls. Reaction conditions: undivided cell, 2 (0.3 mmol), H2O (1 mL), MeCN (9 mL), 3.5 F mol−1. aIsolated yield of the major diastereomer. bDetermined by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture. cCombined yield of the two diastereomers.

Heating a solution of the major isomer of 3n in MeCN at 80 °C for 4 h did not lead to isomerization, suggesting that the stereoselectivity of the reaction was not controlled by relative thermodynamic stability of the diastereomers. The major isomer of 3c, which contained a sterically less demanding Ph group at the R1 position (cf. Table 1), did not isomerize at room temperature for 1 year. However, heating a solution of this compound in MeCN at 80 °C for 4 h resulted in a mixture of diastereomers in a ratio of 3:1. These results suggest that the sterically demanding substituents at R1 and R2 positions (cf. Table 1) are critical to ensure good stereoselectivity during the product formation and to prevent isomerization after the reaction.

A mechanism for the electrochemical synthesis was proposed based on the results from our previous work [31] and of this work (Scheme 3). The redox catalyst 1 is oxidized at the anode to give radical cation I. In the meanwhile, H2O is reduced at the cathode to afford HO and H2. The base generated at the cathode deprotonates 2a to give its conjugate base II. The anionic II is oxidized by radical cation I through single electron transfer (SET) to give radical intermediate III, which undergoes a biscyclization to give V. Further oxidation of V followed by hydrolysis of the cyclic carbamate moiety leads to the formation of 3a.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Proposed reaction mechanism for the electrochemical synthesis of 3a.

Based on the proposed reaction mechanism and the results mentioned above, the cyclization of vinyl radical IV to give V is the atroposelective step. Density functional theory (DFT)-based calculations suggested that the cyclization of IV could be explained by a Curtin–Hammett scenario (Scheme 4) [42]. Specifically, the equilibrium of the conformations IV and IV′ is much faster than their respectively cyclizations to give V and V′. Since TS2 is relatively lower in energy than TS3, V is formed as the major product.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Computation investigation on the vinyl radical cyclization. DFT (M06-2X/6-31G*) calculated energetics (kcal mol−1) are Gibbs free energies in MeCN.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed a diastereoselective approach for the synthesis of axially chiral biaryls through an electricity-powered cyclization cascade. The reactions employ easily assembled starting materials and afford functionalized imidazopyridine-based biaryls in good to high yields and diastereoselectivity.

Supporting Information

File 1

Experimental part.

Acknowledgments

Financial support of this research from MOST (2016YFA0204100), NSFC (21672178), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, is acknowledged.

This article is part of the thematic issue "Reactive intermediates part I: radicals".

References

  • 1.Bringmann G, Gulder T, Gulder T A M, Breuning M. Chem Rev. 2011;111:563–639. doi: 10.1021/cr100155e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pu L. Chem Rev. 1998;98:2405–2494. doi: 10.1021/cr970463w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tanaka K. Chem – Asian J. 2009;4:508–518. doi: 10.1002/asia.200800378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wallace T W. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:3197–3210. doi: 10.1039/b608470m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bringmann G, Price Mortimer A J, Keller P A, Gresser M J, Garner J, Breuning M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44(34):5384–5427. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma G, Sibi M P. Chem – Eur J. 2015;21:11644–11657. doi: 10.1002/chem.201500869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Link A, Sparr C. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:3804–3815. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00875a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Y-B, Tan B. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:534–547. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang H, Yang X, Tang W. Tetrahedron. 2016;72:6143–6174. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.08.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wencel-Delord J, Panossian A, Leroux F R, Colobert F. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:3418–3430. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00012b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Raut V S, Jean M, Vanthuyne N, Roussel C, Constantieux T, Bressy C, Bugaut X, Bonne D, Rodriguez J. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:2140–2143. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vorogushin A V, Wulff W D, Hansen H-J. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:6512–6513. doi: 10.1021/ja0201505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo F, Konkol L C, Thomson R J. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:18–20. doi: 10.1021/ja108717r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qiu L, Kwong F Y, Wu J, Lam W H, Chan S, Yu W-Y, Li Y-M, Guo R, Zhou Z, Chan A S C. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:5955–5965. doi: 10.1021/ja0602694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kärkäs M D. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:5786–5865. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00619e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhao Y, Xia W. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:2591–2608. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00572e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen J-R, Hu X-Q, Lu L-Q, Xiao W-J. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(8):2044–2056. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00655d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zard S Z. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1603–1618. doi: 10.1039/b613443m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xiong T, Zhang Q. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:3069–3087. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00852b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran P S. Chem Rev. 2017;117:13230–13319. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wiebe A, Gieshoff T, Möhle S, Rodrigo E, Zirbes M, Waldvogel S R. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2018;57(20):5594–5619. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Möhle S, Zirbes M, Rodrigo E, Gieshoff T, Wiebe A, Waldvogel S R. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2018;57(21):6018–6041. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feng R, Smith J A, Moeller K D. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:2346–2352. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moeller K D. Chem Rev. 2018;118:4817–4833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yan M, Kawamata Y, Baran P S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2018;57(16):4149–4155. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang Q-L, Fang P, Mei T-S. Chin J Chem. 2018;36(4):338–352. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201700740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tang S, Liu Y, Lei A. Chem. 2018;4:27–45. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yoshida J-i, Kataoka K, Horcajada R, Nagaki A. Chem Rev. 2008;108(7):2265–2299. doi: 10.1021/cr0680843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jiang Y, Xu K, Zeng C. Chem Rev. 2018;118:4485–4540. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Francke R, Little R D. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:2492–2521. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60464k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hou Z-W, Mao Z-Y, Melcamu Y Y, Lu X, Xu H-C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2018;57:1636–1639. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hou Z-W, Yan H, Song J-S, Xu H-C. Chin J Chem. 2018;36:909–915. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201800301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hou Z-W, Mao Z-Y, Song J, Xu H-C. ACS Catal. 2017;7(9):5810–5813. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hou Z-W, Mao Z-Y, Zhao H-B, Melcamu Y Y, Lu X, Song J, Xu H-C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55(32):9168–9172. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gieshoff T, Kehl A, Schollmeyer D, Moeller K D, Waldvogel S R. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:12317–12324. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu H-C, Moeller K D. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(41):13542–13543. doi: 10.1021/ja806259z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gieshoff T, Schollmeyer D, Waldvogel S R. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55:9437–9440. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kehl A, Breising V M, Schollmeyer D, Waldvogel S R. Chem – Eur J. 2018;24:17230–17233. doi: 10.1002/chem.201804638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lin M-Y, Xu K, Jiang Y-Y, Liu Y-G, Sun B-G, Zeng C-C. Adv Synth Catal. 2018;360:1665–1672. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201701536. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang S, Li L, Xue M, Zhang R, Xu K, Zeng C. Org Lett. 2018;20:3443–3446. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hu X, Zhang G, Bu F, Nie L, Lei A. ACS Catal. 2018;8:9370–9375. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Seeman J I. J Chem Educ. 1986;63:42–48. doi: 10.1021/ed063p42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File 1

Experimental part.


Articles from Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Beilstein-Institut

RESOURCES