Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 17;25(7):2336–2347. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1565

Human breast cancer xenograft model implicates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling as driver of cancer-induced muscle fatigue

Hannah E Wilson 1,2, Kacey K Rhodes 2,3, Daniel Rodriguez 4, Ikttesh Chahal 5, David A Stanton 5, Joseph Bohlen 5,, Mary Davis 6, Aniello M Infante 7, Hannah Hazard-Jenkins 8, David J Klinke 9, Elena N Pugacheva 2,3, Emidio E Pistilli 2,5,9,10,*
PMCID: PMC6445680  NIHMSID: NIHMS1516937  PMID: 30559167

Abstract

Purpose:

This study tested the hypothesis that a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model would recapitulate the common clinical phenomenon of breast cancer (BC)-induced skeletal muscle (SkM) fatigue in the absence of muscle wasting. This study additionally sought to identify drivers of this condition to facilitate the development of therapeutic agents for BC patients experiencing muscle fatigue.

Experimental Design:

Eight female BC-PDOX-bearing mice were produced via transplantation of tumor tissue from eight female BC patients. Individual hind limb muscles from BC-PDOX mice were isolated at euthanasia for RNA-sequencing, gene and protein analyses, and an ex vivo muscle contraction protocol to quantify tumor-induced aberrations in SkM function. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the BC-PDOX mice relative to control mice were identified using DESeq2, and multiple bioinformatics platforms were employed to contextualize the DEGs.

Results:

We found that SkM from BC-PDOX-bearing mice showed greater fatigability than control mice, despite no differences in absolute muscle mass. PPAR, mTOR, IL-6, IL-1, and several other signaling pathways were implicated in the transcriptional changes observed in the BC-PDOX SkM. Moreover, three independent in silico analyses identified PPAR signaling as highly dysregulated in the SkM of both BC-PDOX-bearing mice and early stage non-metastatic human BC patients.

Conclusions:

Collectively, these data demonstrate that the BC-PDOX model recapitulates the expected BC-induced SkM fatigue and further identify aberrant PPAR signaling as an integral factor in the pathology of this condition.

Keywords: cachexia, breast cancer, fatigue, PPAR gamma, patient-derived orthotopic xenograft

Translational Relevance

Cancer-associated skeletal muscle fatigue is a common problem in clinical oncology that is often associated with cancer cachexia, but is not exclusively observed in cachectic patients. The majority of breast cancer (BC) patients report muscle fatigue despite cachexia being relatively rare in this patient population, especially in patients with non-metastatic disease. The clinically relevant phenotype of muscle fatigue in the absence of frank cachexia has no established model system and no approved therapeutic agents. Here, we utilize a breast cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (BC-PDOX) model to recapitulate the human phenotype of tumor-induced muscle fatigue without muscle wasting. Bioinformatics analyses via multiple platforms identifies peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling as central to transcriptional alterations observed in skeletal muscle from both BC-PDOX-bearing mice and human BC patients. These data suggest that pharmacological agents targeting PPAR isoforms, such as FDA-approved thiazolidinediones (TZDs), may be of clinical benefit to BC patients experiencing muscle fatigue.

Introduction

Cachexia has been clinically recognized as a consequence of advanced cancer for millennia (1) and has been recognized as a cause of death in a significant portion of cancer patients for nearly 100 years (2). Despite this long history, the mechanistic underpinnings of this devastating condition remain poorly understood, and no curative therapeutics exist (3). A complicating factor in the treatment of cancer cachexia is its multifactorial nature that defies an easy definition, but most agree that cachexia includes some combination of weight loss, inflammation, and abnormal metabolism (4,5). A multifactorial treatment approach is needed to treat this syndrome (69), and that approach must consider the potentially disparate pathologies contributing to weight loss, muscle wasting, and muscle fatigue (10).

SkM dysfunction in cancer patients is often considered a consequence of muscle wasting. However, a large percentage of women with BC report fatigue (1114) despite <20% of BC patients experiencing significant weight loss, and <5% having any cachexia-related International Classification of Disease code on their electronic medical records (15). While muscle strength and fatigue are strongly related to muscle mass in male cancer patients, this does not appear to be the case in women. Studies in multiple cancer types indicate female patients lose muscle quality without losing muscle mass (1618). This sexual dimorphism in susceptibility to muscle wasting versus muscle dysfunction must be acknowledged given that women with advanced cancer have significantly lower incidence of cachexia than men (1921). One cannot conclude that weight-stable women are immune to the quality of life deficits of cancer-induced muscle dysfunction. Elucidating the mechanistic underpinnings of the clinically relevant phenotype of cancer-induced muscle dysfunction in female patients could provide a great quality of life benefit to BC patients and survivors. A first step toward this goal includes the establishment of a model system that recapitulates the clinically relevant phenotype of cancer-induced muscle dysfunction in the absence of muscle wasting.

A significant barrier to progress in the field of cancer cachexia is the lack of a diverse set of model systems that adequately reflect the heterogeneity of human responses to tumor growth. The use of spontaneous or engrafted tumor models in inbred mouse strains enforces a degree of uniformity in the laboratory that does not exist in the clinic. Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models, wherein a human tumor fragment is implanted into the appropriate anatomical location of an experimental animal, offer a significant improvement over established cell-line based grafts in their increased ability to reproduce human disease histology and progression (22). As the PDOX model recapitulates human disease histology, progression, and metastatic burden, it is reasonable to hypothesize that BC-PDOX mice will recapitulate the common clinical phenomenon of BC-induced SkM fatigue in the absence of muscle wasting.

In this study, we characterized the transcriptional alterations and assessed multiple physiological parameters induced in SkM of female mice bearing BC-PDOXs. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and subsequent bioinformatics analyses indicated aberrations in canonical pathways previously implicated in cancer cachexia, along with multiple novel pathways that have not yet been related to this phenomenon. Correlation of the BC-PDOX model with our previously published gene expression profile of human BC patients’ SkM strongly implicates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling in the pathophysiology of BC-induced muscle fatigue (23). To the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the first characterization of cancer-induced alterations in the SkM transcriptome in the context of a BC-PDOX model, as well as the first successful attempt to generate a model of BC-induced muscle dysfunction in the absence of muscle wasting. Collectively, these data demonstrate that BC-PDOX tumor growth recapitulates the expected BC-induced muscle fatigue and further identify aberrant PPAR signaling as an integral factor in the pathology of this condition.

Materials and Methods

Patient selection.

BC tumor tissue was procured at West Virginia University (WVU) Cancer Institute and by the NCI Cooperative Human Tissue Network under approved WVU Institutional Review Board protocol and WVU Cancer Institute Protocol Review and Monitoring Committee. Informed written consent was obtained from each subject or each subject’s guardian. Individuals could be included in this study if they 1) were deemed to have operable disease or were undergoing a diagnostic biopsy, 2) had been diagnosed with, or were suspected to have, invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, 3) were over 21 years old, and 4) provided informed consent. Muscle biopsies were obtained from BC patients and controls as previously reported (23). Conduct of research involving human patients at West Virginia University is guided by the principles set forth in the Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Belmont Report) and is performed in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services policy and regulations at 45 CFR 46 (Common Rule).

Establishment of BC-PDOX models.

Animal experiments were approved by the WVU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. BC-PDOX models were produced by implanting freshly collected breast tumor tissue into the cleared mammary fat pad of NOD.CG-Prkdscid Il2rgtm1 Wjl/SzJ/ 0557 (NSG) mice (Figure 1A) as previously described (24,25). Briefly, female NSG mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. An incision was made over the lower lateral abdominal wall, a 3mm pocket was opened under the skin to expose the mammary fat pads, and a single tumor fragment of 2-mm3 was placed into the pocket. Tumor growth was assessed by veterinary staff based on approved WVU Tumor Development and Monitoring Policy.

Figure 1: Establishment of BC-PDOX model.

Figure 1:

Analysis of SkM from BC-PDOX mice compared to NSG controls indicates widespread transcriptional reprogramming of SkM transcriptome in response to tumor growth. (A) Schematic diagram outlining establishment of BC-PDOX models (P0) and passaging of tumor to generate study animals (P0-P2). (B) Normalized gene expression heat map showing differential expression patterns of the 50 most differentially expressed genes between BC-PDOX (n = 4) and NSG control mice (n = 4) organized according to unsupervised clustering analysis. (C) Principle component analysis showing that transcriptional profiles of NSG and BC-PDOX SkM cluster separately, indicating that tumor growth induces transcriptional alterations in SkM.

BC-PDOX-bearing mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation upon reaching a maximal tumor burden score, or earlier if exhibiting signs of health distress. BC-PDOX tumors were then removed from the passage number 0 (P0) animals and cut into fragments, which were then frozen and in part passaged into naïve NSG animals to produce passage number 1 (P1) PDOX. Experimental animals bearing BC-PDOX (P0–2) were euthanized at the same humane endpoint as P0 animals. Mice were housed at 22oC under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle and received food and water ad libitum. Each BC-PDOX model produced was authenticated with original patient’s biopsy using genomic DNA and short tandem repeat based PCR amplification (Arizona University Genomics Core Facility, Tucson, AZ, USA). Routine human and mouse pathogen screening was performed on original and passaged tissue by Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). RNA sequence and whole exome analysis of original biopsy and passage 1 BC-PDOX further confirm relatedness of samples and stability of genomic alterations identified in BC patient and corresponding PDOX. Expression of clinically relevant BC receptors correlate with the original BC biopsy. BC-PDOX mice (n=8) were compared to non-tumor NSG mice (n=6) as well as NSG mice that received human BC-PDOXs which did not engraft (PDOX-Con; n=5).

E0771 syngeneic mammary tumor model.

Detailed methods for E0771 mouse mammary tumor cell growth in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice have been previously described (23). Briefly, 1×106 E0771 cells were suspended in sterile PBS and orthotopically implanted into the 4th inguinal mammary fat pad on the left side of experimental mice. Three arms of the study included: uninjected control mice (Con; n=8), mice euthanized following 2 weeks of tumor growth (2WK, n=5), and mice euthanized following 4 weeks of tumor growth (4WK, n=11). E0771 cells were obtained through an MTA (Wake Forest University Health Sciences; July 2014). Cells were authenticated and screened for the presence of contaminants prior to use (IDEXX Bioresearch, Westbrook, Maine, USA). Experiments described in this publication using E0771 cells were completed between January 2015 and June 2016.

RNA isolation, sequencing, and bioinformatics.

Total RNA was isolated from gastrocnemius muscles of experimental mice (n=4 per group), and pectoralis major muscles from human patients (23) using Trizol (ThermoFischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and established methods (26). RNA purity was assessed using a Nano-Drop spectrophotometer, with 260/280 readings of at least 2.0. RNA quantity was measured via a qubit fluorometer. RNA integrity was measured on an Agilent bioanalyzer with an RNA Nano chip. RNA samples had RNA Integrity Numbers (RIN) >9, indicating high quality RNA. Libraries for RNA-seq were constructed and DEGs were identified according to previously published methods (23). RNA-Seq libraries were built using the Stranded mRNA kit from KAPA- Biosciences with Illumina compatible adapters. The concentrations of the completed libraries were quantified with a qubit fluorometer using high sensitivity DNA reagent. Libraries were subsequently run on the bioanalyzer using a high sensitivity DNA chip to determine average fragment size. Completed libraries were then pooled in equimolar concentrations and sequenced on one lane of the HiSeq 1500 with PE50 bp reads (BioProject ID: PRJNA496042; murine samples). Subsequently, data were compared to the GRCm38.84 reference genome from Ensembl. There was no alignment step utilized. However, Salmon was used for quantification, with both gcBias and seqBias set, and libType A (27). Salmon output was imported into DESeq using tximport (28). DESeq was run with default parameters with the exception of a filtering step: genes which did not have a least three samples with a count of at least 10 were eliminated. RNA-Seq output was analyzed using various bioinformatics platforms: STRING (29), Enrichr (30), Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuitypathway-analysis), and GeneAnalytics (31). Values presented from Enrichr analyses represent those obtained via querying the intersecting set of transcription factors’ target genes identified by both the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) and ChIP Enrichment Analysis (ChEA).

Protein isolation.

Protein homogenates were made from tibialis anterior muscles of experimental mice (n = 4 or 5 per group), pectoralis major muscles from human BC patients (n=15) and control female patients undergoing breast surgery (n=5) using a 5 mL Wheaton tissue grinder (DWK Life Sciences Inc., Millville, NJ, USA) in a tissue lysis buffer (20 mM Tris HCl (pH = 7.4), 150 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM NaO3V) with 1X Pierce Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Homogenates were cleared via brief centrifugation, and protein concentration was quantified using Pierce Coomassie Plus Protein Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s protocol.

Western blotting.

Protein homogenates were diluted to a final concentration of 1 µg . µL−1 in 1X NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific). 15– 20 µg of total protein was loaded per well, resolved in NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris Gels (ThermoFisher Scientific). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, blocked for 1 hour in 1X tris-buffered saline (TBS), 0.1% Tween20, 5% bovine serum albumin followed by incubation with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Membranes were then washed thrice in TBS + 0.1% Tween20 prior to application of appropriate secondary antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 90 minutes at room temperature, and again prior to application of Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific). Relative band intensity was quantified using the GE Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA, USA) and normalized to GAPDH. Primary antibodies included: phospho-Stat5 (#9314S; RRID: AB_2302702), phospho-Stat3 (#9138S; RRID: AB_331261), Stat5 (#9363S; RRID: AB_2196923), Stat3 (#9139S; RRID: AB_331757), PPARγ (#PA3–821A; RRID: AB_2166056), and GAPDH (#2118S; RRID: AB_561053).

qRT-PCR.

Total RNA was isolated from gastrocnemius muscles of BC-PDOX mice (n = 8), NSG control mice (n = 6), PDOX-Con mice (n=5), and pectoralis major muscles of BC patients (n=20) and control female patients (n=10) as described above. 2 µg of cDNA was produced using Invitrogen SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s protocol, and relative expression of selected genes was analyzed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) with the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific). Primer efficiencies were determined to be between 90% and 110% and relative mRNA expression was calculated using the Pfaffl method (32). qRT-PCR primers (Supplemental Table 1) were designed using Primer3 (33).

Ex vivo muscle physiological analysis.

Muscle contractile properties were examined in the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of experimental mice using methods as previously described (3436). Muscles were transferred to an oxygenated tissue bath containing Ringer’s solution (100 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 3.4 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 25 mM HEPES, and 5.5 mM D-glucose) maintained at 22°C. Muscle length was adjusted to obtain the maximal twitch response and this length was recorded as optimal length (i.e., Lo). Parameters analyzed from isometric twitch contractions included peak isometric twitch force (Pt), contraction time (CT), ½ relaxation time (½ RT), rate of force production and rate of relaxation. With the muscle set at Lo, the force-frequency relationship was generated to quantify maximal force by stimulating muscles with increasing frequencies as follows: 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 80, 100, 120, and 150 Hz. Muscle fatigue was analyzed using a repeated stimulation protocol lasting 6 min and consisting of repeated 40Hz tetanic trains that occurred once every second and lasted 330 ms. LabChart software V7 (ADInstruments, RRID: SCR_001620) was used to obtain the area under the fatigue curve (AUC) and used as a measure of total force produced during the fatigue protocol. To interpolate the fatigue data as a function of time, a piece-wise cubic spline function with five evenly spaced interior knots was linearly regressed to the data using the splines (V3.4.0), spline2 (V0.2.8), and stats (V3.4.0) packages in R (V3.4.0; RRID: SCR_001905). The first derivative of the fit cubic splines and the corresponding 95th percentile confidence intervals were used to determine whether the rate of change in fatigue was significantly different between conditions. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated by dividing the muscle mass by the product of the muscle density coefficient (1.06 g . cm3), muscle Lo, and the fiber length coefficient (EDL: 0.45). The calculated whole muscle CSA value was used to calculate specific force (i.e., absolute force mN. muscle CSA–1) (37,38).

Statistics.

GraphPad Prism (V5; RRID: SCR_002798) was utilized to analyze the following data sets. Student’s t-Test was used (α = 0.05) to compare means for protein expression via Western blotting and log2-transformed fold changes (log2(FC)) in mRNA expression in human samples. One-way ANOVA was used to compare log2(FC) in mRNA expression in murine samples, muscle weights, and selected muscle contractile properties, including AUC, Lo, isometric force, CT, ½ RT, rate of force production, and rate of relaxation. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between groups in force output over time during the 6 minute fatigue protocol. Goodness-of-fit (r2) for the relationship between STAT3 and STAT5 activation (e.g. pSTAT3/totalSTAT3) vs. each physiological parameter was analyzed using the linear regression feature of GraphPad Prism, comparing the best-fit linear regression line to H0 where the best-fit line is a horizontal line (i.e. m = 0) through the mean of all Y values (n=8, pooled NSG and BC-PDOX).

Results

In silico pathway and transcription factor analysis of RNA-Seq in skeletal muscles from the BC-PDOX mouse model.

Muscle tissue from four mice bearing unique BC-PDOX tumors representing four different patients were used for RNA-Seq (Supplemental Table 2) and compared to muscle tissue from non-tumor NSG control mice. Unsupervised clustering analysis identified a unique transcriptional signature present in the BC-PDOX muscle, with a general trend of transcriptional downregulation (Figure 1B), supporting our previously published transcriptional signature of SkM from early stage BC patients (23). Principal component analysis (PCA) shows clustering of the BC-PDOX SkM transcriptional signatures, separate from the more tightly clustered controls (Figure 1C).

IPA identified several canonical pathways as being dysregulated in this model, with multiple identified pathways having been previously implicated in cancer cachexia and muscle dysfunction in other models, including signaling via PPARs, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). IPA additionally identified several pathways that have not yet been connected to cancer cachexia and therefore warrant further study in the context of tumor-induced SkM dysfunction, such as integrin and gap junctions signaling. Interestingly, IPA predicted no significant dysregulation within three pathways that have been strongly implicated in cancer cachexia in other models (Figure 2A). IPA Molecule Activity Predictor (MAP) predicted inhibition of muscle contraction resulting from aberrant calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Figure 2B). MAP additionally predicted decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation in SkM due to decreased activity of electron transport chain complexes IV and V (Figure 2C).

Figure 2: In Silico Pathway and Transcription Factor Analysis of RNA-Seq Data.

Figure 2:

(A) Selected canonical pathways identified by IPA in the transcriptome of BC-PDOX mice. For each pathway listed on the x-axis, the y-axis reports the raw number of differentially expressed genes in the BC-PDOX SkM relative to NSG controls, separated into up- and downregulated transcripts. The y-axis additionally reports the –log(p-value) reported by IPA; –log(p-value) > 1.33 is equivalent to p < 0.05. The figure reports pathways identified by IPA as significantly dysregulated in our model that have been previously implicated in cancer cachexia (left), significantly dysregulated in our model but not previously implicated in cancer cachexia (center), or previously implicated in cancer cachexia but not identified by IPA as significantly dysregulated in our model (right). (B) IPA predicts decreased release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in the SkM of BC-PDOX mice resulting in decreased muscle contraction. (C) Complex IV and V of the electron transport chain are predicted by IPA to have decreased activity in the BC-PDOX mice relative to NSG controls, resulting in decreased ATP production. (D) Top ten most highly ranked transcriptional regulators identified by Enrichr as regulating the transcriptional alterations observed in SkM of BC-PDOX and human BC patients where the input gene list was exclusively downregulated transcripts. Transcription factors are ranked by overlap% (calculated as [(transcripts regulated by transcription factor x) ∩ (transcripts differentially expressed in SkM of tumor-bearing subject)] / (transcripts regulated by transcription factor x)). The y-axis reports overlap%, –log(adjusted p-value), and combined scores for each transcription factor as reported by Enrichr. Arrows identify PPARG and NFE2L2/NRF2. (E) IPA Upstream Regulator analytic predicts weak inhibition of STAT3. Key for (B, C, E): Green shading indicates decreased expression of transcripts coding for the shaded entity, red shading indicates increased expression of transcripts coding for the shaded entity, blue shading indicates decreased predicted activity/production of the shaded entity, and orange shading indicates increased predicted activity/production of the shaded entity.

The observed trend of transcriptional downregulation in both BC patients (23) and the BC-PDOX SkM transcriptomes suggests the involvement of genome-wide transcriptional reprogramming. We therefore conducted an in silico transcription factor enrichment analysis of the downregulated transcripts in each model (Figure 2D), as well as an analysis including all DEGs (Supplemental Figure 1A–B) using Enrichr. This analysis identified peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NFE2L2, also known as NRF2) as transcriptional regulators with altered activity in both models. Consistent with this analysis, NFE2L2/NRF2 and PPAR signaling were also identified as dysregulated by IPA (Figure 2A). IPA predicted weak inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and moderate inhibition of STAT5 signaling in the BC-PDOX SkM relative to NSG control mice (Figure 2E). Contrary to previous reports on the involvement of STAT3 in tumor-induced SkM dysfunction (39), neither IPA, Enrichr, nor confirmatory western blotting identified significant activation of STAT3 in SkM in our model (Supplemental Figures 1A–C). Interestingly, we observed a near-significant increase in pSTAT3 and total STAT3, and a statistically significant decrease in total STAT5 (Supplemental Figures 1D–E), but no significant change in the ratio of activated to total STAT protein in either case, suggesting alternative signaling might be involved. Additionally, the ratio of activated to total STAT3 or STAT5 protein did not correlate with any muscle contractile parameter obtained (Supplementary Table 3).

Comparison of RNA-Seq profiles in skeletal muscles from human BC patients and BC-PDOX mice identifies PPAR-signaling as a central regulator of breast tumor associated transcriptional alterations in muscle tissue.

In comparing the SkM-specific gene expression signatures from the BC-PDOX model to the previously published transcriptome of human BC patients’ SkM (23), expression of 40 transcripts were similarly altered, with 85% of these being downregulated in both models (Figure 3A). STRING analysis identified a significant functional relationship between the 40 input genes (p = 4.87e−14), with PPAR signaling molecules being central to the generated network and insulin signaling molecules as enriched in the 40 gene set (Figure 3B). Given that 40 genes is a somewhat undersized dataset for enrichment analysis, we utilized two additional bioinformatics tools to verify the role of PPARγ as a regulator of mammary tumor-induced SkM alterations. Consistent with our transcription factor analysis of downregulated transcripts in each model (Figure 2), in silico transcription factor analysis of the 40 overlapping DEGs identified PPARγ as the single significantly enriched transcriptional regulator (adjusted p = 4.8e−6) (Figure 3C). A third gene enrichment tool, GeneAnalytics, also identified PPAR signaling, twice, in the 8 high scoring pathways enriched in the 40 gene set (Figure 3D), where high scoring matches are defined as those with a corrected p-value < 0.001 when using a binomial distribution to test the null hypothesis that the 40 input genes are not over-represented in the pathways noted on the x-axis. Negative controls for Enrichr and STRING enrichment analyses using a random set of 40 protein-coding genes identified no significant enrichments, with all adjusted p-values > 0.9 (Supplementary Figure 1F–G).

Figure 3: Genes with Altered Expression in BC Patients and BC-PDOX Mice Identifies PPAR Signaling as Potential Driver of BC-Induced SkM Fatigue.

Figure 3:

(A) Venn diagram identifying 40 genes with commonly altered expression (e.g. downregulated in both sets) in both human BC patients and BC-PDOX mice, with experimentally verified targets of PPARs underlined. (B) STRING in silico protein-protein interaction analysis identifies significant functional interactions between the 40 commonly altered transcripts (p-value = 4.87e-14), with PPARγ and related signaling molecules central to the generated network of protein-protein interactions present in the set of 40 commonly altered transcripts (red, KEGG 03320, FDR = 0.003). Insulin signaling molecules are also significantly enriched in this gene set (blue, KEGG 04910, FDR = 0.018). (C) PPAR signaling is identified by GeneAnalytics twice in the eight pathways identified as high scoring matches (corrected p-value < 0.0001). (D) Enrichr in silico transcription factor analysis (ENCODE and ChEA Consensus from ChIP-X) identified PPARγ as the single significantly enriched transcriptional regulator in the 40 commonly altered transcripts. The y-axis reports overlap%, –log(adjusted p-value), and combined scores for each transcription factor as reported by Enrichr; -log(adjusted p-value) > 1.33 is equivalent to adjusted p-value < 0.05.

Verification and validation of RNA-Seq profiles in skeletal muscles from BC-PDOX mice and human BC patients.

The gene expression of Pparg and a subset of known and predicted Pparg targets identified in Figure 3A (Cidec, Fabp4, Rbp4, Slc1a5) were verified and validated by qRT-PCR in the same samples used in RNA-Seq as well as in a new cohort of SkM samples, respectively. In muscles from the original cohort of BC-PDOX mice, the median log2(FC) was negative for all genes, indicating downregulation of gene expression. In the verification samples, Cidec, Pparg, Rbp4 and Slc1a5 were significantly downregulated. In the validation samples, Fabp4 was significantly downregulated and Cidec and Pparg showed a statistical trend for downregulation (Figure 4A). In muscles from human BC patients, the median log2(FC) was negative for all samples, indicating downregulation of gene expression. In the verification samples, Fabp4, Pparg, Rbp4 and Slc1a5 were significantly downregulated while Cidec showed a statistical trend for downregulation. In the validation samples, Pparg and Slc1a5 were significantly downregulated while Cidec and Fabp4 showed a statistical trend for downregulation (Figure 4B). The protein abundance of PPARγ was evaluated in muscles from BC patients. While there were no differences in total PPARγ protein between control and BC patients, we did observe a greater abundance of a truncated form of PPARγ, at approximately 40kDa, in the muscles from BC patients (Figure 4C). Following orthotopic implantation of the syngeneic mouse breast tumor cell line, E0771, Pparg gene expression in SkM was lower in weight stable tumor bearing mice and was greater in tumor-bearing mice that lost body weight (Supplementary Figure 2).

Figure 4: qRT-PCR and protein verification and validation of RNA-Seq.

Figure 4:

qRT-PCR was performed for Pparg and a subset of known and predicted Pparg target genes to both verify and validate the RNA-Seq completed in muscles from BC-PDOX mice and human BC patients. (A) Verification and validation of RNA-Seq in muscle samples from control and BC-PDOX mice. (B) Verification and validation of RNA-Seq in muscle samples from control and BC patients. Each graph includes the log2(FC) and associated p-value for the gene analyzed. (C) Protein quantification of PPARγ in muscle samples from control (n=5) and BC patients (n=15). One representative blot is presented. *, p<0.05.

Tumor growth in BC-PDOX mice induces a greater rate of skeletal muscle fatigue and a slowing of isometric contractile properties.

EDL muscles from BC-PDOX-bearing mice, NSG control mice, and PDOX-Con mice were stimulated ex vivo using a repeated contraction protocol to analyze muscle fatigue properties in response to BC-PDOX growth. The shape of the fatigue index curve from muscles of BC-PDOX mice was significantly different than the curve from NSG control mice and PDOX-Con mice, especially during the first 80s of the protocol, with force output declining rapidly from the initiation of the protocol (Figure 5A). AUC was also significantly lower in muscles from BC-PDOX mice compared to muscles from NSG control mice and showed a statistical trend when compared to muscles from PDOX-Con mice (Figure 5B). These fatigue responses in mice implanted with BC-PDOXs are strikingly similar to the muscle fatigue responses we previously reported in an orthotopic syngeneic BC model using C57BL/6 mice (23). Fatigue data were also interpolated as a function of time to evaluate the rate of change in muscle fatigue during different phases of the fatigue protocol (Figure 5C). The rate of change was significantly greater in muscles from BC-PDOX mice compared to muscles from both control groups during the early phase of the fatigue protocol (i.e. first 150 contractions). Thus, muscles from tumor-bearing mice have a greater rate of fatigue and reach their threshold force values earlier in the fatigue protocol. Similar rate of change curves were obtained in EDL muscles from immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice following four weeks of orthotopic E0771 mammary tumor growth (Supplementary Figure 3A). These data demonstrate a greater rate of muscle fatigue in response to mammary tumor growth regardless of the host’s immune status, providing strong support for an effect of mammary tumor growth on inducing muscle fatigue.

Figure 5: BC-PDOX Induces SkM Fatigue.

Figure 5:

(A) Average ex vivo SkM fatigue curves generated for NSG control animals (NSG, n = 6), surgical control animals (PDOX-CON, n = 5), and BC-PDOX mice (n = 6), using the EDL muscle. The leftward shift of the BC-PDOX fatigue curve indicates greater fatigability. The chart presents mean fatigue index +/− SEM for every 10th contraction in the fatigue protocol; PDOX-CON vs PDOX groups compared via two-way ANOVA. (B) AUC for the fatigue curves presented in A. (C) First-derivative curves generated for the fatigue curves presented in A, representing the rate of change in force output of the EDL muscle. (D) Absolute mass comparisons of EDL, soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles in the BC-PDOX mice, NSG mice, and PDOX-CON, showing no significant differences; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; means compared via one-way ANOVA unless otherwise stated.

Isometric contractile data for the EDL muscles in all groups are presented in Table 1. While there was no significant difference in CT, the rate of force development of twitch contractions was lower in muscles from BC-PDOX mice. In addition, ½ RT was longer and the rate of relaxation was lower in EDL muscles from BC-PDOX mice. Similar contractile properties were observed in EDL muscles from mice bearing syngeneic E0771 mammary tumors (Supplementary Figure 3B). Absolute twitch and tetanic forces were lower in muscles from BC-PDOX mice. However, specific twitch and tetanic forces were not different between groups. There were no significant differences in the absolute mass of EDL, soleus, gastrocnemius, or tibialis anterior muscles among the groups (Figure 5D). Collectively, these data indicate that isometric twitch properties of the fast EDL muscle are slowed in response to mammary tumor growth in the absence of quantifiable differences in muscle mass and normalized isometric force output.

Table 1:

Ex vivo isometric contractile parameters in the EDL muscle

NSG PDOX-Con BC-PDOX p-value
EDL Lo (mm) 11.5 ± 0.4 11.8 ± 0.4 11.1 ± 1.1 0.0985
Twitch (mN) 38.5 ± 4.4 33.3 ± 7.9 51.9 ± 7.1 0.0001
Twitch (mN.CSA−1) 40.4 ± 19.6 34.4 ± 8.1 44.6 ± 8.1 0.3178
Contraction Time (ms) 21.4 ± 6.9 25.0 ± 5.5 23.0 ± 9.5 0.7220
½ Relaxation Time (ms) 31.7 ± 4.1 46.0 ± 5.5 33.3± 7.1 0.0017
Rate of Force Development (mN.s−1) 1481 ± 339.3 1038 ± 180.1 1867 ± 415.2 0.0010
Rate of Relaxation (mN.s−1) −682.3 ± 46.2 −450.9 ± 174.2 −921.5 ± 169.5 0.0001
Tetanus (mN) 201.1 ± 22.5 179.6 ± 41.3 243.7 ± 28.0 0.0015
Tetanus (mN.CSA−1) 204.3 ± 85.2 184.6 ± 40.9 212.8 ± 33.3 0.6233

Discussion

This study tested the hypothesis that the BC-PDOX mouse model would recapitulate the common clinical phenomenon of BC-induced SkM fatigue in the absence of muscle wasting. We found that BC-PDOX-bearing mice indeed show greater SkM fatigability than non-tumor-bearing NSG control mice and PDOX-Con mice, despite no differences in absolute muscle mass. We then discovered that SkM from BC-PDOX-bearing mice exhibits widespread transcriptional changes, including alterations in pathways previously reported to be relevant to cancer cachexia (e.g. PPAR, mTOR, IL-6, IL-1) as well as those that have never been reported in this condition (e.g. signaling via integrins and gap junctions). These data validate the use of BC-PDOX as a model of BC-induced SkM dysfunction and identify novel therapeutic targets to improve muscle function in BC patients.

We have recently published the unique transcriptional signature of SkM from early stage non-metastatic BC patients, which showed transcriptional alterations in pathways involved in mitochondrial function, oxidative phosphorylation, and PPAR signaling (23). These data revealed that SkM responds to breast tumor growth with a general downregulation of transcriptional activity; a response that was not affected by breast tumor subtype or whether patients received chemotherapy prior to surgery and biopsy acquisition. In addition, the gene networks identified were dysregulated in SkM at a time when cachexia (i.e. muscle wasting) was likely not evident, as both body mass index and serum albumin levels were not different between BC patients and non-cancer patients in this study (23). In the current study, we extend these observations by analyzing a cohort of immunocompromised mice bearing human BC tumors of multiple molecular subtypes, including luminal, triple-negative, and HER2 overexpressing tumors. When comparing the transcriptional signature of SkM in human BC patients to SkM from BC-PDOX mice, similar patterns emerged with respect to affected markers and pathways, with 40 genes concordantly affected by breast tumor growth in SkM from human BC patients and mice bearing human breast tumors. This set of 40 genes represents those that are dysregulated early in the course of BC progression (BC patients), remain dysregulated into the late stages of disease (BC-PDOX model), and are altered in two different SkMs (pectoralis major vs. gastrocnemius). Moreover, our in silico analysis strongly implicates PPAR signaling in the transcriptional alterations observed in SkM in response to tumor growth, and a large percentage of the DEGs common to both BC-PDOX and BC patients’ SkM are either verified or predicted targets of PPARs. A subset of these PPAR targets, including Cidec, Fabp4, Rbp4 and Slc1a5, are central to the network of protein-protein interactions present in the SkM of both BC patients and BC-PDOX mice and were validated and verified in both mouse and human muscle samples. Therefore, it is probable that these genes and their associated networks represent a significant driving force behind BC-induced muscle dysfunction and fatigue and further suggests that PPAR signaling may be mechanistically central to BC-associated SkM dysfunction. Although Pparg gene expression was downregulated in muscles of human BC patients, we did not observe a concomitant reduction in PPARγ protein abundance. However, our PPARγ antibody did recognize a lower molecular weight (~40kDa) protein with a greater abundance in muscles from BC patients. Studies have suggested that truncated forms of PPARγ, which are cleaved by active caspases, decrease the transcriptional activity of PPARγ by not translocating to the nucleus (4042). This mechanism of action is consistent with our analyses, in which multiple down-stream targets of PPARγ are transcriptionally down-regulated in muscles of BC patients and BC-PDOX mice.

PPARs are lipid sensing, ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate multiple metabolic processes throughout the body, with a particularly strong role in regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. PPARα is predominately expressed in tissues with high rates of fatty acid catabolism, including liver, SkM, and cardiac muscle. PPARγ is highly expressed in adipose tissue, is considered a master regulator of adipogenesis, and modulates insulin sensitivity. PPARβ/δ is the least well-characterized of the PPARs, but it is ubiquitously expressed in most tissues, regulates blood cholesterol and glucose levels, and is involved in fatty acid oxidation (43). Because PPARs play an obvious role in regulating whole body energy homeostasis, there has been significant success in modulating these transcription factors for the benefit of patients with diabetes, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis (44); and promising anti-catabolic efficacy has been observed with PPAR agonists in mouse models of Lewis lung carcinoma (45), colon adenocarcinoma (46), and non-small cell lung cancer (47). PPARγ is one of the main regulators of adipocyte differentiation (48,49) and is downregulated in SkM of BC patients (23) and BC-PDOX-bearing mice. Clinical trials utilizing PPARγ agonists have been undertaken for BC previously, as there was a hypothesis that the agonists would cause the mammary tumor cells to undergo terminal differentiation and cease proliferation (50,51). A phase II trial using the oral anti-diabetic drug and PPARγ ligand troglitazone in advanced BC patients showed no benefit in terms of BC progression, but this study did not report assessments of body weight, muscle strength, or muscle fatigue. The drug was tolerated well by patients (52), however. As our data indicate that downregulation of PPARγ transcriptional activity may play an important role in mediating BC-associated muscle dysfunction, further studies assessing the efficacy of PPARγ agonists in ameliorating BC-induced fatigue are warranted.

BC-PDOX tumor growth in female mice resulted in increased SkM fatigability, decreased rate of force development, decreased rate of twitch relaxation, and increased ½ RT in the fast EDL muscle. This shift to a slower, more fatigable EDL occurred despite no change in EDL mass relative to control mice. The rate of twitch force development and relaxation are both strongly influenced by calcium release and reuptake in specialized compartments of the myocyte. The rate of force development in SkM depends upon the rate of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) through the ryanodine receptors (RyR), and the rate of SkM relaxation is strongly influenced by the removal of calcium ions from the cytoplasm by the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) (53,54). Expression of multiple key regulators of calcium flow in SkM were altered, and IPA identified canonical calcium signaling pathways as being significantly altered in the BC-PDOX SkM. Expression of transcripts encoding calsequestrin 1 (casq1), calsequestrin 2 (casq2), and RyR were all decreased, and IPA predicted impaired calcium release from the SR as a direct result of these transcriptional alterations, which may explain the slowed rate of force development in BC-PDOX SkM. However, we did not observe a change in mRNA expression of any SERCA isoform (adjusted p-values of 0.64, 0.87, and 0.92 for Atp2a1, Atp2a2, and, Atp2a3, respectively). Our data directly conflict with recent reports describing increased expression of calsequestrin (39) and SERCA isoforms (39,55) in SkM of tumor-bearing mice. This discrepancy could reflect differences in the animal models used, cancer types studied, or stage of cancer cachexia progression.

A recent report quantifying SkM deficits in male APCMin/+ mice during cachexia progression similarly identified a slower, more fatigable phenotype in the SkM of weight-stable mice, with STAT3 activation correlating with alterations in the rate of twitch contraction and relaxation (39). In our BC-PDOX model, we observed alterations in the rate of twitch contraction and relaxation in the absence of STAT3 activation, and STAT3 activation did not correlate with any muscle contractile parameter obtained from the BC-PDOX mice. This discrepancy indicates that while inflammation correlates with the slowing of SkM physiology in one model, inflammatory signaling via STAT3 is likely not associated with the slowed muscle contractile parameters observed in BC-PDOX mice.

Collectively, our data show that BC-induced muscle dysfunction can be effectively recapitulated and studied in a BC-PDOX model. The overall slowing and greater rate of fatigue of the fast EDL muscle, coupled with altered expression of several key regulators of SkM calcium handling, suggest that alterations in calcium handling contribute to the slow, fatigable phenotype induced by tumor growth. Additionally, three independent in silico analyses identified PPARγ signaling as highly dysregulated in both BC-PDOX SkM and in the muscle of early stage BC patients, suggesting that PPAR agonists may be of clinical benefit to BC patients experiencing fatigue. In conclusion, PPAR signaling, particularly PPARγ signaling, likely mediates a significant portion of mammary tumor’s impact on SkM. Further studies are warranted to determine if PPAR agonists would provide a quality of life benefit to BC patients with muscle dysfunction. Given that the side effect profile of these drugs is relatively benign, PPAR agonists may prove useful as an additive therapy to alleviate cancer-induced muscle fatigue.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P20GM121322, American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (09-061-04; E. Pistilli) and the WVCTSI through the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104942; S. Hodder). Additional support for this research was provided by WV-INBRE (P20GM103434), CA193473 (to D.J. Klinke) and CA148671 (to E.N. Pugacheva) from the NIH/NCI in part by a NIH/NCRR5 P20-RR016440-09. The WVU HSC Core Facilities were supported by the NIH grants P30- RR032138/GM103488, S10-RR026378, S10-RR020866, S10-OD016165, and P20GM103434. The Authors thank Linda Metheny-Barlow, PhD, for providing the E0771 tumor cells for this project. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Financial support and disclosures: Research supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P20GM121322, American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (09-061-04; E. Pistilli) and the WVCTSI (U54GM104942; E. Pistilli). Additional support for this research was provided by WV-INBRE (P20GM103434) and CA148671 (to E.N. Pugacheva), CA193473 (to D.J. Klinke).

Footnotes

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.KATZ AM, KATZ PB. Diseases of the heart in the works of Hippocrates. Br Heart J 1962;24:257–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warren S The immediate causes of death in cancer. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 1932;184:610–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aoyagi T, Terracina KP, Raza A, Matsubara H, Takabe K. Cancer cachexia, mechanism and treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015;7(4):17–29 doi 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i4.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argiles J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr 2008;27(6):793–9 doi 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011;12(5):489–95 doi 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yavuzsen T, Davis MP, Walsh D, LeGrand S, Lagman R. Systematic review of the treatment of cancer-associated anorexia and weight loss. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(33):8500–11 doi 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.8010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013;10(2):90–9 doi 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Argilés JM, Busquets S, Stemmler B, López-Soriano FJ. Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14(11):754–62 doi 10.1038/nrc3829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aversa Z, Costelli P, Muscaritoli M. Cancer-induced muscle wasting: latest findings in prevention and treatment. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017;9(5):369–82 doi 10.1177/1758834017698643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Madeddu C, Mantovani G, Gramignano G, Macciò A. Advances in pharmacologic strategies for cancer cachexia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015;16(14):2163–77 doi 10.1517/14656566.2015.1079621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blesch KS, Paice JA, Wickham R, Harte N, Schnoor DK, Purl S, et al. Correlates of fatigue in people with breast or lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1991;18(1):81–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(4):743–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D, Groopman JE, Horning SJ, Itri LM, et al. Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients: new findings from the Fatigue Coalition. Oncologist 2000;5(5):353–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Evans WJ, Lambert CP. Physiological basis of fatigue. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(1 Suppl):S29–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fox KM, Brooks JM, Gandra SR, Markus R, Chiou CF. Estimation of Cachexia among Cancer Patients Based on Four Definitions. J Oncol 2009;2009:693458 doi 10.1155/2009/693458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kilgour RD, Vigano A, Trutschnigg B, Hornby L, Lucar E, Bacon SL, et al. Cancer-related fatigue: the impact of skeletal muscle mass and strength in patients with advanced cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2010;1(2):177–85 doi 10.1007/s13539-010-0016-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stephens NA, Gray C, MacDonald AJ, Tan BH, Gallagher IJ, Skipworth RJ, et al. Sexual dimorphism modulates the impact of cancer cachexia on lower limb muscle mass and function. Clin Nutr 2012;31(4):499–505 doi 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neefjes ECW, van den Hurk RM, Blauwhoff-Buskermolen S, van der Vorst MJDL, Becker-Commissaris A, de van der Schueren MAE, et al. Muscle mass as a target to reduce fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017;8(4):623–9 doi 10.1002/jcsm.12199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baracos VE, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Gioulbasanis I, Antoun S. Body composition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a contemporary view of cancer cachexia with the use of computed tomography image analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91(4):1133S–7S doi 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28608C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wallengren O, Iresjö BM, Lundholm K, Bosaeus I. Loss of muscle mass in the end of life in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2015;23(1):79–86 doi 10.1007/s00520-014-2332-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anderson LJ, Liu H, Garcia JM. Sex Differences in Muscle Wasting. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;1043:153–97 doi 10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hoffman RM. Patient-derived orthotopic xenografts: better mimic of metastasis than subcutaneous xenografts. Nat Rev Cancer 2015;15(8):451–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bohlen J, McLaughlin SL, Hazard-Jenkins H, Infante AM, Montgomery C, Davis M, et al. Dysregulation of metabolic-associated pathways in muscle of breast cancer patients: preclinical evaluation of interleukin-15 targeting fatigue. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9(4):701–14 doi 10.1002/jcsm.12294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DeRose YS, Gligorich KM, Wang G, Georgelas A, Bowman P, Courdy SJ, et al. Patient-derived models of human breast cancer: protocols for in vitro and in vivo applications in tumor biology and translational medicine. Curr Protoc Pharmacol 2013;Chapter 14:Unit14.23 doi 10.1002/0471141755.ph1423s60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dunphy KA, Tao L, Jerry DJ. Mammary epithelial transplant procedure. J Vis Exp 2010(40) doi 10.3791/1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pistilli EE, Jackson JR, Alway SE. Death receptor-associated pro-apoptotic signaling in aged skeletal muscle. Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death 2006;11(12):2115–26 doi 10.1007/s10495-006-0194-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods 2017;14(4):417–9 doi 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res 2015;4:1521 doi 10.12688/f1000research.7563.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H, Kuhn M, Wyder S, Simonovic M, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45(D1):D362–D8 doi 10.1093/nar/gkw937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44(W1):W90–7 doi 10.1093/nar/gkw377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ben-Ari Fuchs S, Lieder I, Stelzer G, Mazor Y, Buzhor E, Kaplan S, et al. GeneAnalytics: An Integrative Gene Set Analysis Tool for Next Generation Sequencing, RNAseq and Microarray Data. OMICS 2016;20(3):139–51 doi 10.1089/omi.2015.0168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29(9):e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40(15):e115 doi 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.O’Connell G, Guo G, Stricker J, Quinn LS, Ma A, Pistilli EE. Muscle-specific deletion of exons 2 and 3 of the IL15RA gene in mice: effects on contractile properties of fast and slow muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2015;118(4):437–48 doi 10.1152/japplphysiol.00704.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pistilli EE, Alway SE, Hollander JM, Wimsatt JH. Aging alters contractile properties and fiber morphology in pigeon skeletal muscle. J Comp Physiol B 2014;184(8):1031–9 doi 10.1007/s00360-014-0857-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pistilli EE, Bogdanovich S, Garton F, Yang N, Gulbin JP, Conner JD, et al. Loss of IL-15 receptor α alters the endurance, fatigability, and metabolic characteristics of mouse fast skeletal muscles. J Clin Invest 2011;121(8):3120–32 doi 10.1172/JCI44945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brooks SV, Faulkner JA. Contractile properties of skeletal muscles from young, adult and aged mice. J Physiol 1988;404:71–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lynch GS, Hinkle RT, Chamberlain JS, Brooks SV, Faulkner JA. Force and power output of fast and slow skeletal muscles from mdx mice 6–28 months old. J Physiol 2001;535(Pt 2):591–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.VanderVeen BN, Hardee JP, Fix DK, Carson JA. Skeletal Muscle Function During the Progression of Cancer Cachexia in the Male ApcMin/+ Mouse. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2017:jap.00897.2017 doi 10.1152/japplphysiol.00897.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Niu Z, Shi Q, Zhang W, Shu Y, Yang N, Chen B, et al. Caspase-1 cleaves PPARgamma for potentiating the pro-tumor action of TAMs. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):766 doi 10.1038/s41467-017-00523-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chang JS, Ha K. A truncated PPAR gamma 2 localizes to mitochondria and regulates mitochondrial respiration in brown adipocytes. PLoS One 2018;13(3):e0195007 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0195007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guilherme A, Tesz GJ, Guntur KV, Czech MP. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces caspase-mediated cleavage of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in adipocytes. J Biol Chem 2009;284(25):17082–91 doi 10.1074/jbc.M809042200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Berger J, Moller DE. The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annu Rev Med 2002;53:409–35 doi 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chiarelli F, Di Marzio D. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists and diabetes: current evidence and future perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4(2):297–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moore-Carrasco R, Figueras M, Ametller E, López-Soriano FJ, Argilés JM, Busquets S. Effects of the PPARgamma agonist GW1929 on muscle wasting in tumour-bearing mice. Oncol Rep 2008;19(1):253–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jiang F, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Pan X, Yu L, Liu S. L-Carnitine Ameliorates Cancer Cachexia in Mice Partly via the Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-Associated PPAR-γ Signaling Pathway. Oncol Res Treat 2015;38(10):511–6 doi 10.1159/000439550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Goncalves MD, Hwang SK, Pauli C, Murphy CJ, Cheng Z, Hopkins BD, et al. Fenofibrate prevents skeletal muscle loss in mice with lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115(4):E743–E52 doi 10.1073/pnas.1714703115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wahli W, Braissant O, Desvergne B. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors: transcriptional regulators of adipogenesis, lipid metabolism and more… Chem Biol 1995;2(5):261–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 1994;79(7):1147–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fenner MH, Elstner E. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2005;14(6):557–68 doi 10.1517/13543784.14.6.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mueller E, Sarraf P, Tontonoz P, Evans RM, Martin KJ, Zhang M, et al. Terminal differentiation of human breast cancer through PPAR gamma. Mol Cell 1998;1(3):465–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Burnstein HJ, Demetri GD, Mueller E, Sarraf P, Spiegelman BM, Winer EP. Use of the peroxisome proliferator-acivated receptor gamma ligand troglitazone as treatment for refractory breast cancer: a phase II study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2003;79(3):391–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Berchtold MW, Brinkmeier H, Müntener M. Calcium ion in skeletal muscle: its crucial role for muscle function, plasticity, and disease. Physiol Rev 2000;80(3):1215–65 doi 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Close RI. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 1972;52(1):129–97 doi 10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fontes-Oliveira CC, Busquets S, Toledo M, Penna F, Paz Aylwin M, Sirisi S, et al. Mitochondrial and sarcoplasmic reticulum abnormalities in cancer cachexia: altered energetic efficiency? Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1830(3):2770–8 doi 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

RESOURCES