Human amniotic membrane as a drug carrier – An in-vitro study using fortified cefazolin ophthalmic solution

Abstract

Purpose:

Our previous study demonstrated the drug reservoir function of human amniotic membrane (HAM) using stable moxifloxacin as a model drug. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate whether HAM can be used as a drug carrier for extended release of extemporaneous preparation of cefazolin.

Methods:

HAM Buttons (1 Control, 5 Test) were incubated in a freshly prepared (1 ml) sterile topical solution of cefazolin 5% (w/v) for 3 h and 24 h at two different temperatures. The groups were designated as follows: Group IA: Soaking duration 3 h at 4°C; Group IB: Soaking duration 3 h at room temperature; Group IIA: Soaking duration 24 h at 4°C; and Group IIB: Soaking duration 24 h at room temperature. The release kinetics of cefazolin from different groups of drug-laden HAM was studied for a period of 5 days. Samples were assayed for estimation of cefazolin content at different time intervals by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with Photodiode array (PDA) detector.

Results:

Three-hour cefazolin treatment with HAM at 4°C caused high drug entrapment (24%) compared to room temperature (11%; P < 0.005); however, the release kinetics was not significantly different between Group IA and IB as well as Group IIA and IIB up to the study period. Increase in drug treatment duration did not show increase in entrapment, but caused two-fold (IA Vs IIA) and 1.6-fold (IB Vs IIB) less drug entrapment at 4°C and room temperature, respectively.

Conclusion:

The results reveal that HAM may be a suitable drug carrier for extended delivery of fortified formulations without compromising stability.

Corneal ulceration is a common problem in South India and most often occurs after a superficial corneal injury with an organic material.[1] In a study conducted in Madurai, Tamilnadu, it was found that Streptococcus pneumoniae, a gram-positive organism, was responsible for a majority of bacterial ulcer cases.[1] Similar result of preponderance of bacterial ulcers caused by S. pneumoniae was found in Nepal.[2] However, another study of suppurative keratitis in Gangetic West Bengal, Eastern India revealed that Staphylococcus aureus, another gram-positive organism, accounted for a vast majority of bacterial keratitis.[3] All these studies point toward gram-positive organisms being the root cause of majority of bacterial keratitis cases.

The empirical antibiotics available for the management of bacterial keratitis include fluoroquinolone monotherapy or a combination therapy of fortified antibiotics (cefazolin 5% and tobramycin or gentamicin 1.4%).[4] The initial treatment of suspected cases of infective keratitis with fortified topical antibiotics has been the gold standard.[4]

Topical fortified cefazolin (5%) has been widely used in the management of bacterial keratitis mainly due to gram-positive organisms including Cornybacterium.[5] Cefazolin is a first-generation cefalosporine antibiotic that acts by inhibiting cell wall synthesis in susceptible bacteria.[6] However, in many countries, cefazolin ophthalmic solutions are not available commercially, and hence, can be prepared when required by mixing parenteral or lyophilized cefazolin sodium with sterile water for injection or with artificial tears.[7]

Human amniotic membrane (HAM), with its inherent anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antiangiogenic properties makes up for an excellent substrate for growth, migration, and adhesion of epithelial corneal and conjunctival cells, thereby increasing its use in a variety of ocular surface reconstruction surgeries.[8,9,10] It is reported earlier that AM transplantation is a useful adjunctive treatment to cefazolin for S. aureus keratitis in rat model.[11] In our previous study, the drug reservoir function of HAM was demonstrated with moxifloxacin (antibacterial for gram-negative organisms) as a model drug, and found that HAM could release moxifloxacin for an extended period of 7 weeks.[12] Therefore, in the present study, the extemporaneous ophthalmic preparation of cefazolin was chosen to investigate the drug carrying capacity of HAM and its beneficial role in the treatment of corneal ulcers mainly due to gram-positive organisms. The present study showed that HAM may be an excellent carrier for not only stable drug formulations but also fortified ophthalmic formulations, and could release drug over a period of 5 days without compromising stability. Therefore, drug-laden HAM may be beneficial for extended release of drugs to achieve good therapeutic concentrations for conditions where a steady supply of drug is needed.

Methods

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai (IR #: RES2015011BAS).

Cell culture plates and dishes were obtained from Corning (Corning, NY). Gratis sample of pure cefazolin standard (96% purity) was obtained from Aurolab, Madurai. HPLC grade solvents were purchased from Merck Chemicals (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and purchased from the chemical vendors. HAM was obtained by elective caesarean section at the Department of Gynaecology, PAMC Hospital, Madurai after obtaining informed consent. The tissues were processed for HAM organ culture by the method described previously,[12] and were handled according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

HAM organ culture and drug treatment

The pre-weighed HAM buttons with a mean weight of 40.9 ± 3.9 mg were used for the present study. HAM Buttons (1 Control, 5 Test) were incubated in a freshly prepared (1 ml) sterile fortified cefazolin 5% (w/v) (Aurolab, India) for 3 h (Group I) and 24 h (Group IIA) at two different temperatures [4°C and at room temperature (RT) (25 ± 2°C). The groups were designated as follows: Group IA: Soaking duration 3 h at 4°C; Group IB: Soaking duration 3 h at RT; Group IIA: Soaking duration 24 h at 4°C; and Group IIB: Soaking duration 24 h at RT.

In-vitro drug release kinetics

At the end of each incubation time, HAM buttons were given a quick wash with simulated tear fluid (STF) to remove the surface-bound drug. Then the drug-laden HAM buttons were placed into six-well plate containing 1 ml STF (without drug) and incubated at 37°C with relative humidity of 65% and 5% CO_2. One hundred microliter of the STF was sampled out at different time intervals and replaced with equal volume of STF to maintain the sink condition. The amount of drug released from the drug-laden HAM was studied for a period of 5 days. The amount of cefazolin in all the samples was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after precipitating the proteins with methanol (SRL, Chennai, India).

Estimation of cefazolin by HPLC

The estimation of cefazolin was done using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system with PDA detector (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The analytical separation was achieved with the mobile phase consisting of triethylamine buffer (pH 8) and acetonitrile in the ratio of 80:20 (v/v) pumped at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min into Luna C-18 Column (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 μm; Phenomenex, California, USA) maintained at 30°C. The quantification of cefazolin was carried out at l_Max of 272 nm, and the spectral matching was done with an in-built library matching facility in the PDA detector.

Statistical analysis

The values are presented as Mean ± SEM. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the statistical significance between the treatment groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present study, the HAM buttons were soaked with 5% fortified formulation of cefazolin sodium for a period of 3 and 24 h at 4°C and RT. Because the stability of cefazolin is greatly dependent on pH and temperature, two different temperatures (4°C and RT) were selected for loading drug with HAM. However, the release kinetics was carried out in simulated tear buffer (pH.7.4) at 37°C. The influence of temperature on drug loading and the amount of drug released at different time intervals was investigated over a period of 108 h. The amount of cefazolin in all samples was estimated using HPLC. Cefazolin was eluted at 3.5 min and was found to be stable up to the study period [Fig. 1].

Figure 1.

Chromatogram showing the elution of cefazolin. (a) Elution of cefazolin from pure standard (1μg/ml); (b) Elution of cefazolin from group IB sample at 108 h

Effect of drug soaking time on the release kinetics of cefazolin

The release kinetics of cefazolin in different groups is given in Fig. 2. The cumulative amount of drug released in all groups is shown in Table 1. Three-hour cefazolin treatment with HAM at 4°C caused high drug entrapment compared to RT (Group IA: 12042.51 μg/ml; Group IB: 11126.57 μg/ml). Increase in drug treatment duration (24 h treatment) caused two-fold (IA Vs IIA) and 1.6-fold (IB Vs IIB) less drug entrapment at 4°C and RT, respectively. In all groups (IA and IIA; IB and IIB), the amount of drug released at each time point was found to be statistically significant [Fig. 2; P < 0.05].

Figure 2.

Release kinetics of cefazolin from drug-laden HAM. The amount of cefazolin released from HAM buttons of different incubation periods (Group IA: Soaking duration 3 h at 4°C; Group IB: Soaking duration 3 h at RT; Group IIA: Soaking duration 24 h at 4°C; and Group IIB: Soaking duration 24 h at RT) is shown. Drug soaking at 4°C caused higher drug entrapment compared to RT at each time points studied; however, the release kinetics was not significantly different between the soaking temperatures used. *Comparison between Group IA and IIA; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Mann–Whitney U-test. ^#Comparison between Group IA and IIA; ^#P < 0.05; ^##P < 0.01; Mann–Whitney U-test

Table 1.

Cumulative amount of cefazolin release from all experimental groups

TIME (h)	Group IA			Group IB			Group IIA			Group IIB
	Mean concentration (µg/ml)	SEM	Cumulative amount (µg/ml)	Mean concentration (µg/ml)	SEM	Cumulative amount (µg/ml)	Mean concentration (µg/ml)	SEM	Cumulative amount (µg/ml)	Mean concentration (µg/ml)	SEM	Cumulative amount (µg/ml)
0.5	1805.76	191.29	1805.76	1668.89	203.98	1668.88	884.10**	137.01	884.12	1010.15	123.97	1010.15
1	2033.53	373.63	3839.29	1687.04	125.24	3355.92	830.38**	129.38	1714.50	829.38##	121.02	1839.53
2	1620.42	238.16	5459.72	1536.86	65.94	4892.78	509.64**	69.425	2224.18	498.32##	82.74	2337.85
3	1369.91	127.89	6829.63	1280.82	60.82	6173.59	776.54**	126.91	3000.68	712.98##	91.67	3050.83
4	1180.22	121.48	8009.85	1168.83	42.19	7342.42	609.95*	97.14	3610.64	865.28#	90.13	3916.11
5	1024.47	92.897	9034.33	1083.23	36.56	8425.65	617.93*	90.87	4228.57	1083.23	36.56	4999.34
6	972.41	111.88	10006.73	694.17	102.78	9119.83	502.70*	143.39	4731.28	1032.91#	45.45	6032.25
24	941.89	96.28	10948.63	920.10	34.89	10039.93	358.05**	55.52	5089.32	415.78##	49.86	6448.04
72	646.95	68.72	11595.58	644.43	18.18	10684.36	319.22**	49.92	5408.54	367.86##	44.48	6815.89
108	446.93	48.24	12042.51	442.21	14.22	11126.57	254.08**	25.02	5662.62	249.39##	26.92	7065.29

Different groups represent different drug soaking time at different temperatures. Group IA: Soaking duration 3 h at 4°C; Group IB: Soaking duration 3 h at RT; Group IIA: Soaking duration 24 h at 4°C; and Group IIB: Soaking duration 24 h at RT), Bold values represent the total cumulative amount of drug released up to the study period., *Comparison between Group IA and IIA; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; Mann–Whitney U-test, ^#Comparison between Group IA and IIA; ^#P<0.05; ^##P<0.01; Mann–Whitney U-test

Discussion

AM was first used as a biomaterial in ophthalmic surgery in 1938.[13] It was applied as a replacement for the conjunctiva following the removal of symblepharon. HAM transplantation has been frequently used since then for the treatment of various ocular surface diseases. Its ability to act as a substrate for re-epithelialization with antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory property makes it an appropriate medium for the treatment of corneal ulcers.[8,9] However, such cases demand the use of topical anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics after AM transplantation for better prognosis. Because topical eye drops have to be applied frequently to maintain good ocular bioavailability, repeated application is recommended in most cases which may cause patients’ noncompliance. Hence, there is a pressing need to develop a strategy to deliver drugs continuously without compromising their efficacy. Therefore, in the present study, the drug reservoir function of HAM was evaluated using cefazolin as a model drug with the potential to develop drug-laden HAM as a drug delivering tool for better clinical outcome and prognosis.

Cefazolin is the first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, commonly used as fortified topical drops for the treatment of bacterial keratitis. It is mainly active against nonpenicillinase producing gram-positive bacteria.[4] They are bactericidal β-lactam antibiotics that inhibit enzymes in the cell wall of susceptible bacteria, disrupting cell synthesis. Topical ophthalmic formulation is prepared by adding 5 ml of water for injection to cefazolin injection 250 mg. The drops are refrigerated and should be discarded if they discolor to yellow or after a week, whichever is earlier.[4] It has been reported earlier that cefazolin fortified formulation is stable up to 7 days at 24°C and could be stored at 4°C for an extended duration.[14] Therefore, we have chosen to investigate the effect of temperature (4°C and 25°C) on drug entrapment efficiency with fortified topical cefazolin followed by its transamniotic release kinetics at 37°C.

In the present study, we used two different drug soaking times to check whether the increase in drug soaking time could increase the drug imbibing capacity of HAM. The results indicate that 3 h soaking duration at 4°C showed maximum drug entrapment compared to RT [Fig. 2; Table 1]. This could be due to the fact that the degradation of cefazolin is curtailed when it was stored at low temperature (4°C) compared to RT (25°C). However, there was no significant difference in the release kinetics of cefazolin between drugs loading (both 3 and 24 h) at two different temperatures. It is found that increase in drug soaking duration reduced the drug entrapment efficiency in HAM. This is in agreement with the observation reported by Resch et al. (2010) where they found that there was a significant difference in the release kinetics of ofloxacin after incubating HAM for 1 h and 3 h only and not between 2 h and 3 h.[15] The authors concluded that 2 h pretreatment might be sufficient to completely fill up the membrane with drug formulations. In our previous study using moxifloxacin, increase in drug soaking time beyond 3 h showed marginal increase in drug entrapment efficiency, however, the release kinetics was not significantly different.[12] This shows that HAM may not need longer exposure time to completely fill up the membrane. Moreover, the mean concentration of cefazolin at 108 h was found to be 446.93 ± 48.24, 442.21 ± 14.22, 254.08 ± 25.02, and 249.39 ± 26.92 μg/ml in group IA, IB, IIA, and IIB, respectively. This shows that drug-soaked HAM can release cefazolin even after 5 days without compromising its stability.

Several biological membranes have been utilized for drug permeation studies.[16] Though HAM has been in use in ophthalmology for decades, very few studies have evaluated its drug reservoir function.[15,17,18] The mechanism by which the drugs bind to HAM is not yet studied. It is of paramount importance to understand how the drug interacts with HAM and the drug uptake by the membrane is simply an absorption process or any complexity involved in releasing the drug molecule over the extended duration. It is still unclear whether the binding of drug to HAM membrane is based on charge or due to altered fluidity and permeability of the membrane. More studies in this line are warranted which would give an insight into the interaction between drug molecules and HAM, as well as the factors that influence the drug binding capacity and hence the reservoir function of HAM.

Conclusion

The drug reservoir function of HAM has been demonstrated with fortified cefazolin ophthalmic formulation as a model drug in the present study. Drug soaking at 4°C showed higher drug entrapment compared to RT; however, the release kinetics was not significantly different between the soaking temperatures used. Increase in drug soaking time did not show increase in drug entrapment, and hence brief soaking time may be needed for better drug loading and prolonged drug release. This study further confirms that fortified formulations can also be delivered effectively through HAM. In addition, the availability of freeze-dried technology for the preservation of HAM enables drug-laden HAM as an excellent reservoir system with extended shelf life for clinical use.

Financial support and sponsorship

MUTT study grant, AEH, Madurai.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.