Rph1-mediated resistance to leaf rust in cultivated barley cultivar Sudan is conferred by a single member of a resistance gene cluster on the short arm of chromosome 2H.
Abstract
Unraveling and exploiting mechanisms of disease resistance in cereal crops is currently limited by their large repeat-rich genomes and the lack of genetic recombination or cultivar (cv)-specific sequence information. We cloned the first leaf rust resistance gene Rph1 (Rph1.a) from cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare) using “MutChromSeq,” a recently developed molecular genomics tool for the rapid cloning of genes in plants. Marker-trait association in the CI 9214/Stirling doubled haploid population mapped Rph1 to the short arm of chromosome 2H in a physical region of 1.3 megabases relative to the barley cv Morex reference assembly. A sodium azide mutant population in cv Sudan was generated and 10 mutants were confirmed by progeny-testing. Flow-sorted 2H chromosomes from Sudan (wild type) and six of the mutants were sequenced and compared to identify candidate genes for the Rph1 locus. MutChromSeq identified a single gene candidate encoding a coiled-coil nucleotide binding site Leucine-rich repeat (NLR) receptor protein that was altered in three different mutants. Further Sanger sequencing confirmed all three mutations and identified an additional two independent mutations within the same candidate gene. Phylogenetic analysis determined that Rph1 clustered separately from all previously cloned NLRs from the Triticeae and displayed highest sequence similarity (89%) with a homolog of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) disease resistance protein 1 protein in Triticum urartu. In this study we determined the molecular basis for Rph1-mediated resistance in cultivated barley enabling varietal improvement through diagnostic marker design, gene editing, and gene stacking technologies.
Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is the fourth most important cereal crop in the world and is mainly used for malt production, animal feed and, in some regions, human consumption. This agricultural practice of monoculture in addition to climate change favors the emergence of new pathogen variants that can significantly reduce yield, posing a serious threat to global food security. Since Biblical times, rust pathogens have plagued farmer’s fields causing significant yield losses and, in severe cases, crop failure and famine (Kislev, 1982). In particular, plant pathogens of the Puccinia genus are some of the most feared and damaging diseases of cereal crops (Dean et al., 2012). Although leaf rust caused by P. hordei is the most widespread and serious foliar disease of barley, it can be controlled effectively by genetic resistance (Park et al., 2015). The leaf rust resistance (R) gene Rph1 was first described in barley cultivars (cv) Oderbrucker, Speciale, and Sudan by Roane and Starling (1967) and was mapped to chromosome 2H using trisomic analysis (Tuleen and McDaniel, 1971). Rph1-mediated resistance was later designated Rph1.a to conform with recommended allele symbols for leaf rust resistance genes in barley (Franckowiak et al., 1992). Despite the existence of virulence for most Rph genes in barley by prevailing P. hordei variants, combining multiple genes conferring diverse resistance mechanisms, as demonstrated in wheat (Triticum aestivum; Park, 2003; Koller et al., 2018), could provide a sustained method for broad spectrum disease control (Brun et al., 2010).
The intense diversifying selection imposed on R genes has resulted in high accessional variation at R gene loci including sequence polymorphisms and copy number variation (Noël et al., 1999; Kuang et al., 2005; Chavan et al., 2015; Thind et al., 2018). In many cases, this has led to erosion of the orthogonal relationships between R gene analogs belonging to different accessions of the same species (Noël et al., 1999; Kuang et al., 2005; Chavan et al., 2015; Thind et al., 2018). Most map-based R gene cloning projects therefore include the generation of a high-quality physical sequence (e.g. a bacterial artifificial chromosome tiling path) spanning the flanking markers delimiting the R gene in the resistant accession. This is followed by identification of candidate R genes and experimental validation by transformation of the candidate gene(s) into a susceptible accession (Periyannan et al., 2013; Kawashima et al., 2016). Generating a physical tiling path is, however, expensive and time-consuming.
An alternative or complementary approach involves R gene identification by sequence-comparison of mutants. A line containing the desired R gene in a background that is susceptible to the pathogen isolate of interest is mutated and the progeny is screened for loss-of-resistance. If multiple, independently derived mutant alleles are obtained and found to have mutations in the same gene, this then provides very strong evidence for gene identification; the causal gene can be further substantiated by demonstrating genetic cosegregation between the candidate gene and resistance. The size of cereal genomes, such as 16.03 to 16.58 gigabases (Gb) for wheat (International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2018) and 4.88 to 5.04 Gb for barley (Mascher et al., 2017) imposes a barrier, however, in terms of the cost of sequencing and computational analysis. This can be overcome by sequencing only a selected fraction of the genome, an approach known as “genome complexity reduction.” Because most R genes encode nucleotide binding site Leu-rich repeats (NLR; Kourelis and van der Hoorn, 2018), NLR-exome capture and sequencing can be used to efficiently compare multiple mutant alleles. This strategy was successfully used to clone Sr22, Sr45, Yr5, Yr7, and Pm21 from wheat or wheat-alien introgression lines (Steuernagel et al., 2016; Marchal et al., 2018; Xing et al., 2018). More recently, NLR exome capture on 151 genetically diverse individuals of the wild wheat D-genome progenitor Aegilops tauschii was coupled to association genetics to rapidly clone Sr46 and SrTA1662 (Arora et al., 2018).
The very strength of NLR exome capture in providing a stringent complexity reduction is also its weakness by excluding, perforce (1) NLRs with significant sequence divergence to the source sequences used in bait design, (2) NLRs with exotic integrated domains (Sarris et al., 2016), and (3) R genes not conforming to the canonical structure of an NLR (Fu et al., 2009; Krattinger et al., 2009; Moore et al., 2015). This bias can be overcome by chromosome flow sorting, where only a prior knowledge of the chromosome on which the gene resides is required (Giorgi et al., 2013; Steuernagel et al., 2017). Sánchez-Martín and colleagues flow-sorted and sequenced wheat chromosome 5D from six Pm2 mutants and the parental wild type. Subsequent sequence-comparison was sufficient to identify a single candidate gene that could then be confirmed by sequencing additional mutants (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016). A limitation of this approach is the high number of mutants (∼5 in barley, ∼6 in wheat) necessary to identify a single candidate gene (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016). This requires the generation and screening of a large mutant population, typically numbering several thousand individuals (Mago et al., 2017), in particular in barley (a diploid) where the tolerated mutation density is approximately seven times less than that in hexaploid wheat (Uauy et al., 2017). The requirement for many mutants for unambiguous gene identification can be mitigated if combining chromosome flow sorting with positional mapping (Thind et al., 2017). A limitation of chromosome flow sorting is the generally low quality of assemblies (N50 > 2 kb; 75% genes assembled into contigs with ≥90% query coverage) obtained from flow-sorted and multiple displacement-amplified DNA (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016). This can be vastly improved with Chicago long-range linked-read sequencing and assembly to obtain N50 scaffold sizes of 9.76 Mb to 22.39 Mb (Thind et al., 2017; Xing et al., 2018), although at high cost. In this study, we combined MutChromSeq with genetic mapping to rapidly clone Rph1 in barley cv Sudan from a defined region on chromosome 2H. We also report on developing a cost-effective wild-type sequence assembly with high contiguity (contig N50 > 20.1 kb) and gene space representation (83% of genes with ≥90% query coverage).
RESULTS
The availability of an array of P. hordei pathotypes with contrasting virulence for Rph1-mediated resistance permitted a reliable phenotypic screen at the seedling stage of two barley populations segregating for the Rph1 locus, with the aim of confirming the previous map location reported by Tuleen and McDaniel (1971). The barley cvs CI 9214, Sudan, and Berg were all postulated to carry Rph1 based on greenhouse tests with P. hordei pathotypes with contrasting virulence/avirulence profiles (Table 1). Monogenic inheritance for Rph1-mediated resistance was confirmed by the observed segregation in both barley mapping populations (CI 9214/Baudin and CI 9214/Stirling) when inoculated at the primary leaf stage in the greenhouse with Rph1-avirulent P. hordei pathotype 4610P+ (Table 2, Fig. 1).
Table 1. Infection response data of selected barley genotypes previously postulated to carry the Rph1 resistance gene tested with four P. hordei pathotypes and their Rph1 sequence haplotype.
| Accession | 220P+a | 5457P+b | 4610P+c | 253P-d | Rph1 Haplotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIho 11958 | ;1-CN | 3+ | ;1-CN | ;12C | Susceptible |
| ISR950.13 | ;1-CN | 3+ | ;1-CN | 3+ | Susceptible |
| Seln 8861 | 0;N | 3+ | ;N | 3+ | Susceptible |
| CI9214 | ;1-CN | 3+ | ;1-CN | 3+ | Resistant |
| HOR 15560 | 0;N | 3+ | ;N | 3+ | Resistant |
| Sudan | ;1-CN | 3+ | ;1-CN | 3+ | Resistant |
| Berg | 0;N | 3+ | 0;N | 3+ | Susceptible |
| Bowman+Rph1 | ;N | 3+ | ;N | 3+ | Resistant |
| Bowman5 | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | Susceptible |
| Stirling | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | :1+C | Susceptible |
| Baudin | ;12-C | 3+ | 3+ | ;12-C | NAe |
| Gusf | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | NAe |
Pathotype 220P+ = avirulent on Rph1 and Rph12.
Pathotype 5457P+ = virulent on Rph1 and Rph12.
Pathotype 4610P+ = avirulent on Rph1 and virulent on Rph12.
Pathotype 253P- = virulent on Rph1 and avirulent on Rph12.
NA = not applicable.
Susceptible controls.
Table 2. Segregation frequencies and genetic analysis of three mapping populations when inoculated with two barley leaf rust pathotypes at seedling stage.
| Population | Generation | Pathotype | No. of Lines | Genetic Ratio | X2 | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Res | Seg | Sus | ||||||
| CI 9214/Stirling | DH | 4610P+ | 122 | 0 | 138 | 1:1a | 0.99 | >0.32 |
| CI 9214/Baudin | RIL | 4610P+ | 168 | 0 | 194 | 1:1a | 1.87 | >0.17 |
| Sudan/Berg | F3 | 220P+ | 122 | 0 | 0 | 7:8:1b | 366.0 | <0.0001 |
Res:Sus.
Res:Seg:Sus.
Figure 1.
Monogenic inheritance for Rph1-mediated resistance in the CI 9214 x Stirling and CI 9214 x Baudin mapping populations. Seedling leaves of the infection types of (left to right): CI 9214 (C), Stirling (S), Baudin (B), C/S DH line (Rph1), C/S DH line (rph1), C/B RIL (Rph1), C/B RIL (rph1), and susceptible control Gus inoculated with P. hordei pathotype 4610P+ (virulent on Rph12 in Baudin, Rph9.am in Stirling, and avirulent to Rph1 in CI 9214).
A total of 61 representative genotypes of the CI 9214/Stirling doubled haploid (DH) population from both resistant and susceptible phenotypic classes were selected for genetic mapping of Rph1, and were subsequently genotyped using 10,258 Diversity Arrays Technology sequences (DArT-Seq) marker loci. Further genome-wide marker-trait association (MTA) analysis demonstrated that DArT-seq only on 2HS were significantly associated [−log10 (P-value) of 15] with Rph1 phenotypic scores using Fischer’s exact test, linkage disequilibrium-correlation coefficient, and χ2 analysis (Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. S1; Supplemental Table S1, A and B). Genetic mapping of Rph1 in the CI 9214/Baudin population was also performed using a subset of 92 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the mapping population. A 1.3-Mb physical region in the Morex reference genome sequence known to harbor the Rph1 gene flanked by two DArT-Seq markers (13,139,911 bp and 14,361,439 bp) from the CI 9214/Baudin mapping population was used to search for candidate genes using a modified version of MutantHunter (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016). The flanking markers were identified based on the presence of two recombinants from the 92 RILs on either side of Rph1.
Figure 2.
Marker trait association analysis in the CI 9214 x Stirling DH population maps Rph1 to the short arm of chromosome 2H. Genome-wide Manhattan plot derived from MTA analysis using Fisher’s exact test on 2 × 2 count table for seedling resistance to P. hordei pathotype 4610P+ (binary scoring data) in the CI9214/Stirling DH population using >10,000 DArT-Seq markers. The –log10 of P-values were plotted against the positions on the physical Bowman genome assembly. The peaks above minimum threshold of 2 (P-value = 0.03) can be considered as significantly associated. Vertical axis represents −log10 (P) values of the P-value of the MTA. The colors blue and red were used to differentiate between chromosomes (1H–7H, indicated by tick marks).
A conservative estimate of the genetic and physical interval known to harbor the Rph1 gene enabled a second level of genome complexity reduction in addition to the chromosome sorting. A sodium azide mutant population was produced for the Rph1 differential cv Sudan and 2,100 M2 generation spikes were rust-tested with P. hordei pathotype 4610 P+ in the greenhouse for loss-of-function mutations in the Rph1 gene. We identified 10 spikes that contained putative rph1 knockouts. At least two susceptible seedlings per M2 spike were advanced and their progeny were rust-tested in the M3 generation; nine families were phenotyped as homozygous susceptible and one segregated. Of these, five homozygous susceptible families and one heterozygous mutant family were processed for chromosome sorting for 2H and Illumina sequencing (Fig. 3). Chromosomes were isolated according to Lysák et al. (1999), labeled in suspension with GAA microsatellite using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in suspension following the protocol of Giorgi et al. (2013), stained with diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride and analyzed by a FACSAria II SORP flow cytometer and sorter. The resulting bivariate flow karyotype with the 2H population highlighted is shown in Supplemental Fig. S2. In total, 80,000 copies of chromosome 2H were flow-sorted from Sudan wild-type and six Sudan-derived mutant lines. The purity of the sorted fractions determined by FISH was 86%. Multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was only performed to amplify chromosomal DNA from the six mutant lines; however, in contrast to Sánchez-Martín et al. (2016), importantly MDA was not performed on chromosomal DNA from the Sudan wild type. Illumina sequencing of amplified chromosomal DNA yielded 27.6–45.5 million of 250-bp paired-end (PE) reads for each of the six mutant chromosomes (representing 18–30× coverage). For the wild-type chromosome 2H of cv Sudan, 222 million of 250-bp PE reads were obtained (equivalent to 144× coverage) and assembled into 62,427 scaffolds with N50 = 8,032 and N50 length of 20.7 kb. The total assembly length of 587.7 Mb represents 75% of the estimated chromosome size.
Figure 3.
MutChromSeq and subsequent Sanger sequence confirmation of five susceptible rph1 knockout mutants reveals that Rph1-mediated leaf rust resistance is conferred by a CC NLR gene on chromosome 2H. Cloning of the barley Rph1 gene using MutChromSeq. A, Resistant Rph1 barley wild-type donor cv Sudan, five sodium azide-derived susceptible mutants (M199.2, M422, M430.1, M727, and M767), and the susceptible control Gus. B, Rph1 locus showing intron–exon boundaries, protein domains, and 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions. Mutations identified by both MutChromSeq and Sanger sequencing are indicated by red vertical lines, whereas mutations identified by Sanger sequencing of additional mutants are indicated by black vertical lines. A number above the line indicates identical mutations occurring in independent lines. UTR, untranslated region.
Illumina sequence reads of six mutant lines (M422, M483, M544, M761, M763, and M767) were mapped to the wild-type Sudan chromosome 2H within the 1.3-kb region of interest to search for genes that contain multiple independent mutations. A single full-length gene encoding an NLR (corresponding to HORVU2Hr1G006480.6 in Morex) in scaffold 2895_0 from Sudan contained mutations in lines M422, M761, M763, and M767 (Fig. 3; Supplemental Fig. S3; Table 3). No mutations were identified in lines M483 and M544 using both Illumina or Sanger sequencing, suggesting either a cis regulatory mutation or a second-site suppressor. Further examination of the Illumina reads for line M767 identified a heterozygous C/T mutation changing a Gly to Glu in the conserved GLPL motif. Rust testing in the M3 progeny of M767 determined that it segregated with Rph1-mediated resistance, whereas all other mutant lines were homozygous-susceptible. We PCR-amplified and Sanger-sequenced the Rph1 gene for seven mutant lines (M199, M422, M430, M727, M761, M763, and M767). We confirmed the MutChromSeq results and identified two additional mutations in lines M199 and M430 in the NBS domain. Three mutant lines (M727, M761, and M763) shared the same C/T mutation in the Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain (Gly to Asp), despite originating from different M2 spikes, therefore a total of five independent mutations were confirmed in Rph1 (Table 3).
Table 3. Sodium azide induced mutations in the Rph1 candidate scaffold confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
| bp Position Scaffold 2895_0 | Mutational Change | Affected Lines | Amino Acid Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11,416 | G > A | 763.2, 761.2, 727 | Gly > Asp |
| 12,268 | C > T | 422 | Gly > Asp |
| 12,298 | C > T | 767 | Gly > Glu |
| 12,458 | C > T | 430.1 | Ala > Pro |
| 13,365 | G > A | 199.2 | Gly > Glu |
We also performed MutChromSeq on the entire chromosome 2H assembly to rule out the involvement of additional gene/s outside the defined Rph1 region that show a concordance of multiple independent nonsynonymous mutations. As part of this analysis, we assessed: (1) whether reported single nucleotide polymorphisms were induced by sodium azide mutagenesis (i.e. G > A or C > T), (2) whether the contig reported contains predicted high confidence (HC) coding regions, and (3) whether the reported mutations are located in a coding region of aligned genes. We identified 45 candidate contigs across the entire Sudan chromosome 2H containing mutations. Further examination determined that 31 of the 45 contigs either carried no predicted coding genes or that the identified mutations were not located in predicted genes. In a further five contigs where mutations were identified in genes, manual checking determined they were not induced by sodium azide and were therefore considered false-positives. The remaining contigs carried only a single mutation within a candidate HC gene; however, these mutations were likely nonfunctional. Scaffold 2895_0 identified initially in the 1.3-kb region of interest remained the only plausible Rph1 candidate based on the presence of multiple independent nonsynonymous mutations.
The Rph1 resistance gene in Sudan encoded for an NLR receptor protein (981 amino acid residues) with a predicted Rx coiled-coil (CC) domain and carried a single intron in the NBS domain, which is commonly found in NLRs in the Triticeae subtribe (Steuernagel et al., 2018; Fig. 3). Phylogenetic analysis comparing the full-length Sudan Rph1 protein sequence with that of previously cloned Triticeae NLRs determined that Rph1 was more closely related to the Mla clade than other more divergent rust- and mildew-resistance NLRs, mainly from bread wheat (Fig. 4). The closest ortholog to Rph1 was an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) RPM1 NLR homolog from Triticum urartu, which shared 89% amino acid identity. Further sequence comparison of the Sudan resistance allele with three barley cvs all lacking Rph1-mediated resistance and with available genomic sequence (Morex, Bowman, and Barke) identified seven amino acid substitutions that were common among the susceptible accessions.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic analysis groups Rph1 in a separate cluster from other NLRs conferring rust resistance in cereal crops. Neighbor-joining tree analysis of Rph1 from barley cv Sudan. The Rph1 amino acid sequence was then compared with related NLR sequences from the Triticeae including: A. tauschii (Ata; Lr21-AAP74647.1 and Sr33-AGQ17384.1). S. cereale (Sc; Sr50-ALO61074.1), T. aestivum (Ta; Lr22a-ARO38244.1, Sr22-CUM44212.1, Lr1-ABS29034.1, Sr45-CUM44213.1, Pm2-CZT14023.1, Pm3-ADH04488.1, and Pm8-AGY30894.1), T. urartu (Tu; RPM1-like EMS67965.1), T. monococcum subsp. monococcum (Tm; Sr35-AGP75918.1 and MLA1-ADX06722.1), T. dicoccoides (Td; Lr10-ADM65840.1), and H. vulgare (Hv; MLA1-AAG37354.1, MLA6-CAC29242.1, and MLA9-ACZ65487.1). Statistical support for individual nodes was estimates from 1,000 bootstrap replicates and values are represented as percentages on the nodes (values of >70% are shown). The scale bar represented the proportion of site changes along each branch.
Rph1 barley differential lines Sudan and Berg are known to carry the same race-specificity in response to multiple Australian- and American-derived P. hordei pathotypes; however, the immune (Im) infection type displayed by Berg when challenged with Rph1-avirulent isolates was different from the hypersensitive response (HR) necrosis observed in Sudan. We therefore hypothesized that the R genes carried by Sudan and Berg might be allelic at Rph1 or be different but carry closely linked genes. Rust tests using P. hordei pathotype 220P+ in a Sudan/Berg F3 population (n = 122) did not reveal any segregation (resistance vs susceptible); with all families showing a nonsegregating resistant pattern. The χ2 value (χ2 = 366) significantly (P < 0.0001) deviated from the segregation ratio expected for two independent genes (Table 2). No susceptible individual was recovered among the entire progeny (n = 1,860 seedlings), indicating that the loci conferring seedling resistance in both genotypes is most likely the same, that is, allelic, or two physically proximal genes linked in repulsion. The maximum recombination frequency between two alleles was estimated to be r = 1.2 at P = 0.05.
We assessed the response of eight different barley lines (accessions and cvs) postulated to carry Rph1-mediated resistance with four P. hordei pathotypes with contrasting virulence to determine if they had the Im or HR response characteristic of the resistance observed in Berg and Sudan, respectively (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. S4). Tests indicated that five lines had the HR response and two lines (UWA Seln 8861 and HOR15560) were Im as observed for Berg. We sequenced the Rph1 gene in these three Im lines (Berg, UWA Seln 8861 and HOR15560) and three HR lines (CI 9214, ISR950.13 and CIho 119558) to confirm the haplotype of resistant parent CI 9214 and to determine whether there was any molecular correlation between the haplotypes of lines with the Berg (Im) versus Sudan (HR) phenotypes. The results revealed that both different phenotypes are not determined by their Rph1.a allele sequence. For example, the CI 9214 (HR) and HOR15560 (Im) alleles were identical to that in Sudan (HR); in contrast Berg (Im), CIho 119558 (HR), ISR950.13 (HR), and UWA seln 8861 (Im) all carried the susceptibility allele, suggesting their resistance is conferred by a different gene (Table 1).
DISCUSSION
Understanding and exploiting the mechanisms that underpin important agronomic traits such as resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses is only possible through identifying variants at the molecular level that define their genetic control. Chromosome sorting and sequencing of wild type and multiple independent mutants, referred to as MutChromSeq, provides a lossless complexity reduction method suitable for the cloning of any gene of interest (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016; Steuernagel et al., 2017). In this study, we used this approach to clone the leaf rust resistance gene, Rph1, from cultivated barley. Rph1 was an attractive target due to the ability to reliably phenotype mutants with ablated resistance. We determined that in both the CI 9214/Stirling and the CI 9214/Baudin mapping populations, Rph1 was inherited as a monogenic trait. Although there was no requirement for recombination-based genetic mapping, we used MTA analysis (>10,000 DArT-Seq markers) and mapped Rph1 to the short arm of chromosome 2H in the CI 9214/Stirling DH population, confirming previous trisomic analysis by Tuleen and McDaniel (1971). The coupling of MutChromSeq with genetic mapping in this study reduced the size of the genomic region interrogated and the number of mutants required. This is particularly important for diploid organisms, such as barley, where generating multiple independent knock-outs in the same gene requires more work (i.e. generating and screening of larger mutant populations) compared to that in a polyploid organism, such as bread wheat.
The MutantHunter pipeline reported in Sánchez-Martín et al. (2016) was modified to search for candidates within the 1.3-Mb region harboring Rph1 on chromosome 2HS. We identified multiple independent nonsynonymous mutations within a gene on a single contig (Scaffold 2895_0). It was expected, however, that other sodium azide-induced mutations would also be identified outside the regions of interest. Therefore, we mapped the same mutant reads to the entire Sudan chromosome 2H assembly and identified the same Rph1 candidate on Scaffold 2895_0, thus validating our targeted approach and ruling out the involvement of other genes outside the defined Rph1 region. Nevertheless, numerous contigs (45) were identified outside the target region harboring mutations that, after further examination, were ruled out as candidates due to either (1) the absence of coding sequence, (2) mutations not in coding genes, (3) false-positives, or (4) single nonfunction mutations within genes. Due to the higher N50 of this study (20.1 kb), this number is higher than that reported in the study of Sánchez-Martín et al. (2016) where the N50 was 1.4 kb. Taken together, we identified the Rph1 resistance gene candidate on the short arm of chromosome 2H based on the sequence comparison of three rph1 mutants with wild-type Sudan. All three mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing in addition to a further two independent mutants derived from additional spikes tested at a later stage. Consequently, based on the confirmation of five nonsynonymous mutations, we now refer to this gene as Rph1.
Rph1 encodes a predicted CC NLR receptor protein. Phylogenetic analysis in our study suggested that Rph1 was located in a separate clade and is likely representative of a subfamily of NLRs that is distinct from other recently cloned rust- and mildew-resistance NLR proteins from the Triticeae. Recent cloning studies in wheat have determined that stem rust (Sr33 and Sr50) and leaf rust (Lr22a) protein sequences show marked similarity to previously characterized NLR families such as Mla from barley and RPM1 from Arabidopsis, respectively (Periyannan et al., 2013; Mago et al., 2015; Thind et al., 2017). The closest known ortholog to Rph1 was an RPM1-like NLR protein from T. urartu (89% sequence identity), suggesting both shared a common ancestor; however, we show that Rph1 showed greater similarity to the Mla family relative to that for Lr22a. Although Lr22a was located in a syntenic region on chromosome 2DS to Rph1, bioinformatics analysis using the 2016 Morex genome browser suggests the true ortholog of Lr22a and RPM1 is located ∼1 Mb downstream from the Rph1 gene. Interestingly, the predicted protein sequences of Rph1 and TuRPM1 carried an Rx-like coil-coiled domain at the N-terminal that has been shown to be essential for resistance against virus X in potato (Solanum tuberosum; Bendahmane et al., 2002).
The nucleotide binding ATPase (NB‐ARC) domain of NB‐LRR proteins is known to act as a molecular switch that regulates their activity. Previous characterization of loss‐of‐function mutants suggests that the GLPL motif functions as a hinge, facilitating nucleotide‐dependent movement of the flanking helices, and that the ARC1 subdomain transmits these conformational changes to the other parts of the protein (Leipe et al., 2004). Dodds et al. (2001) determined that a Gly to Glu substitution in the highly conserved GLPL motif of the P2 NLR protein from flax (Linum sativum) compromised resistance to flax rust (Melampsora lini). The HR induced by transient expression of the Rx NLR from potato was inhibited by the presence of two mutations targeting the Gly and Pro residues of the GLPL motif (Bendahmane et al., 2002). We identified the same mutational variant as Dodds et al. (2001) in our study for Rph1 mutant M767. We also identified a second mutation six amino acids downstream from the GLPL motif, suggesting that this conserved region is critical for Rph1-mediated resistance. Interestingly, three mutant families derived from different M2 spikes shared the same mutation in the LRR domain that caused a Gly to change to an Asp. It is likely these M2 spikes were derived from the same meristem cell from a single M1 plant, and hence carry the same mutation that are therefore not independent. Sanger sequencing of the full-length coding sequence in our study failed to detect mutations in M544 and M483, suggesting these families possibly either carry mutations within the regulatory sequences of Rph1 or possibly in a secondary-site repressor. Previous studies in wheat (Feuillet et al., 2003; McGrann et al., 2014), barley (Torp and Jørgensen, 1986), and Arabidopsis (Tornero et al., 2002) indicated that second site or extragenic mutants during R gene loss-of-function screens was a common occurrence.
Genes that confer pathogen defense are often clustered in plant genomes, evolving via duplication, diversifying selection through mutation and transposon-insertion events. In barley, the best example of this is the Mla locus, which is organized into three gene-rich islands separated by retro-transposable elements (Wei et al., 2002). Such gene clusters in plants often comprise allelic series or represent closely related genes with distinct recognition specificities. Rph1 was one of the four clustered NLRs in Morex; however, the corresponding homologous 22-kb scaffold 2895_0 from Sudan carried two full-length NLRs separated by only 2 kb relative to 80 kb in Morex (Supplemental Fig. S3). Taken together, Rph1 appears to be part of a complex resistance locus. In wheat, three closely linked stripe rust resistance genes were recently cloned using MutRenSeq based on the presence of multiple independent mutants in each of the three genes (Marchal et al., 2018). Yr5 and Yr7 were originally hypothesized to be allelic and closely linked with YrSP (Zhang et al., 2009); however, molecular analysis performed on this complex locus on chromosome 2B determined that the Yr5- and Yr7-mediated resistance were each conferred by neighboring paralogous NLR genes (Marchal et al., 2018). In contrast to that for Yr5 and Yr7, Sudan and Berg in our study share the same recognition specificity in response to all Australian and North American P. hordei isolates tested, but differ in the infection type, with Berg displaying immunity and Sudan being characterized by HR necrosis. An allelism test between Sudan and Berg determined phenotypically that no recombinants were found that gave rise to susceptible individuals, indicating that the two genes are either closely linked in repulsion or allelic. Direct comparison of the Rph1 protein sequence between Sudan and three sequenced barley genotypes lacking functional Rph1 (Morex, Bowman, and Barke) identified seven amino acid substitutions that are different between the resistant and susceptible alleles. Sanger sequencing of the Rph1 gene using six barley accessions, including CI 9214, Berg, HOR15560, UWA seln 8861, ISR950.13, and CIho 11958, revealed that both CI 9214 and HOR15560 Rph1 alleles were identical to that in Sudan (Rph1.a); however, Berg and the remaining three accessions carried the same susceptible haplotype as that in Morex, Bowman, and Barke with no correlation between Rph1 haplotype and infection type. The observation that Berg has the rph1 haplotype that is associated with multiple susceptible lines suggests there may be another gene conferring resistance to P. hordei in Berg that is epistatic to the susceptible Rph1 haplotype. It is therefore more likely that the Berg resistance gene is not an allele of Rph1 as hypothesized but likely, as in the case for Yr5/Yr7, a closely linked or neighboring NLR gene. As we did not generate mutants for Berg, we can only speculate that the resistance present in Berg forms part of the same NLR cluster as that for Rph1-mediated resistance. We further hypothesize that due to overlapping specificity, possibly the resistance genes present in Sudan and Berg recognize the same avirulence product in P. hordei.
The major bottleneck for gene cloning in cereal crops is the development of high-quality genomic sequence from the genotype carrying the trait. We significantly improved the wild-type cv Sudan assembly of chromosome 2H and increased the N50 value by 15-fold, from 1.4 kb (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016) to 20.1 kb. We compared the quality of chromosome 2H assemblies for Sudan and Foma (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016) relative to that of the 2D Dovetail assembly reported by Thind et al. (2017) by performing a Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs analysis (http://busco.ezlab.org; Simão et al., 2015) and by mapping all predicted HC genes to the respective chromosome two assemblies (Supplemental Table S2, A and B). All forms of analysis indicated that not using MDA before Illumina sequencing and library construction improved the overall assembly quality in wild-type Sudan. Sánchez-Martín and colleagues were able to successfully clone a gene from both wheat and barley with an average N50 of 1.4 kb, meaning that 50% of the chromosome was assembled with contigs of 1.4 kb or longer. The full-length Pm2 gene in wheat, however, is >4 kb, suggesting that the contig harboring Pm2 was likely derived from a rather small frequency of large sequence contigs. Methods such as MutChromSeq and the recently developed targeted chromosome-based cloning via long-range assembly are unique as they generate cv-specific sequence information that allows the functional exploration of sequences not found in a reference genome (Steuernagel et al., 2016; Thind et al., 2017). Although our reported N50 is far from comparable to the recently developed Chicago long-range sequencing technology, it permits a low-cost effective haplotype analysis of nonreference genomes. Furthermore, our improved wild-type chromosome assembly provides increased confidence when cloning genes with large introns using the MutChromSeq approach.
In conclusion, recently developed genomic methodologies such as MutChromSeq, targeted chromosome-based cloning via long-range assembly, MutRenSeq, and AgRenSeq can now be used to mitigate the limitations of traditional map-based cloning approaches in crop plants. We used MutChromSeq to clone Rph1, which confers leaf rust resistance in barley. Seven amino acid changes were identified as diagnostic for resistance and susceptibility, enabling the prospect of enhanced marker-assisted selection. Although virulence for Rph1-mediated resistance is present at varying frequencies in global P. hordei pathogen populations, identifying the basis of resistance in a wide array of R genes from crops will allow effective pyramiding of multiple resistances into elite crop varieties. The rapid introduction of multiple favorable disease-resistance alleles in plants can also now be accelerated because of the emergence of new breeding technologies such as gene editing coupled with speed breeding (Ghosh et al., 2018; Watson et al., 2018). Future work will also involve determining the effectiveness of Rph1-mediated resistance in response to other diseases in crops such as wheat, maize (Zea mays), and rice (Oryza sativa) using a transgenic approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant and Pathogen Materials
The barley (Hordeum vulgare) cv CI9214 was postulated to carry Rph1, whereas cvs Baudin (Rph9.z) and Stirling (Rph9.am) were known to lack Rph1 based on their seedling response in multipathotype tests. Two barley mapping populations were produced to map the Rph1 resistance gene, including a CI 9214/Stirling (258 lines) DH population and an F9 generation RIL population derived from the cross CI 9214/Baudin (385 lines). Both populations were sourced from the Plant Breeding Institute–University of Sydney. For tests of allelism, barley leaf rust differential genotypes cvs Sudan and Berg were crossed to produce F1 seed. Each F1 plant was then selfed to produce F2 seed, and 150 F2 seeds derived from a single F1 plant were randomly selected and space planted, then selfed in the field in 2017 and 130 F3 families were harvested for rust testing.
The four pathotypes of Puccinia hordei used in the study, along with their virulence/avirulence profiles, are listed in Table 1. Both mapping populations and a collection of barley accessions postulated to carry Rph1 were phenotypically assessed separately with the four P. hordei pathotypes, which have contrasting virulence. We used two Rph1-avirulent [4610P+ and 220P+] and two Rph1-virulent [5457P+ and 253P-] pathotypes, respectively, to rule out the involvement of known all-stage resistance genes in parental genotypes Stirling (Rph9.am) and Baudin (Rph12).
Statistical Analyses
The Chi squared (χ2) test was used to determine the goodness-of-fit between the phenotypic data recorded from disease infection types versus expected genetic ratios.
Inoculation Procedure and Disease Assessment
Seedlings were inoculated as described by Dracatos et al. (2014) for both mapping and mutant populations. Infection types were recorded 10 d post-inoculation using the “0” to “4” scale (Park and Karakousis, 2002). Infection types of test lines of each population were compared with those displayed by the parents and barley differential lines to assure accurate classification into resistant and susceptible classes.
Mapping Rph1 in the CI 9214/Stirling and CI 9214/Baudin Mapping Populations
Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaf tissues of a single plant from a subset of 61 CI 9214/Stirling DH lines and 92 CI 9214/Baudin RILs from both mapping populations, using the CTAB method as described by Fulton et al. (1995). The DNA was prepared and shipped to DArT for genotypic analysis as detailed on their Web site: www.diversityarrays.com.au.
Marker-Trait Analysis of Closely Linked DArT Markers at the Rph1 Locus
The phenotypic data using P. hordei pathotype 4610P+ was converted to binary data (susceptible 3+ = 0, resistant ;1-CN = 1). Marker-trait analysis of each DArT-Seq marker with the Rph1 phenotype was conducted by computing Fisher’s exact test on 2 × 2 count tables using R statistical software (www.r-project.org). The null hypothesis was that the DArT-Seq marker genotypes were not associated with resistance to P. hordei, hence a random distribution of genotypes in the resistant and susceptible phenotypic groups. The log10 of P-values were plotted against the positions on the physical Bowman genome assembly by means of chromosome-wise and genome-wide “Manhattan” plots. DArT-Seq markers associated with the Rph1 resistance gene are detailed in Supplemental Table S2.
Generation of Mutant Population and Phenotypic Analysis
The mutagenesis procedure was performed according to that described in Chandler and Harding (2013) with some modifications. Approximately 2,500 seeds of barley cv Sudan were immersed in water at 4°C overnight. The imbibed seed were transferred to a 2-l measuring cylinder filled with water and aerated with pressurized air for 8 h, with one change of water after 4 h. The water was drained. Seeds were incubated in a shaker for 2 h in freshly prepared 1 mm sodium azide dissolved in 0.1 m sodium citrate buffer (pH 3.0), washed extensively in running water for at least 2 h, and placed in a fume hood to dry overnight. Seeds were sown in pots. After two weeks, pots were transferred to an outside standout area. After another two weeks, seedlings were space transplanted to the field. Approximately 9,400 spikes were harvested from ∼1,700 M1 plants, that is, on average 5–6 spikes/plant. Because each tiller is usually derived from independent (genetically distinct) meristem cells in the seed embryo (Stadler, 1928), the M2 seeds were threshed from single spikes.
The Sudan M2 spikes and M2-derived M3 families were phenotypically assessed using the Rph1-avirulent pathotype 4610P+. In all cases at least two susceptible plants were transplanted for each candidate M2 family, segregating for rph1 knockouts for progeny testing. All sequence-confirmed mutants were progeny-tested at both the M3 and M4 generations and found to be homozygous-susceptible. Sanger sequence confirmation of all mutants was performed using sequence-specific primers designed to capture both exon regions of the Rph1 candidate gene.
Flow Sorting and Preparation of Chromosomal DNA
Suspensions of intact mitotic chromosomes were prepared as described by Lysák et al. (1999). Briefly, root tip meristem cells were synchronized using hydroxyurea, accumulated in metaphase using amiprophos-methyl, and mildly fixed by formaldehyde. Chromosome suspensions were prepared by mechanical homogenization of 50 root tips in 1 mL ice-cold LB01 buffer (Doležel et al., 1989). Chromosome analysis and sorting was done on a FACSAria II SORP flow cytometer and sorter (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems). Barley 2H chromosomes were sorted after bivariate analysis of diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride fluorescence and fluorescence of GAA microsatellites labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate using FISH in suspension (Giorgi et al., 2013).
Illumina Library Construction and Sequencing
Flow-sorted chromosomes were treated with freshly prepared proteinase K and purified on Microcon YM-100 columns (Millipore). For 2H chromosomes from mutant lines, DNA was amplified by MDA using Illustra GenomiPhi V2 DNA Amplification Kit (GE Healthcare) as described by Šimková et al. (2008). Amplified DNA was then fragmented by a Bioruptor sonication device (Diagenode) and used to prepare sequencing libraries with a TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Library Prep kit (Illumina). For 2H chromosome of cv Sudan (wild type), nonamplified DNA (16 ng) was directly fragmented with a Bioruptor sonication device and subsequently used to prepare a sequencing library with the NEBNext UltraII DNA library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs). Pooled libraries of wild-type and five mutant chromosomes were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq in Rapid Run mode to gain 2 × 250-bp PE reads. Trimmomatic was used to remove sequencing adaptors and trim raw reads (LEADING: 20 TRAILING: 20 SLIDINGWINDOW: 4:15 MINLEN: 100). The assembly of the wild-type chromosome sequence was performed with Meraculous (Chapman et al., 2011) using k-mer size 111.
MutChromSeq
We extended the functionality of the MutChromSeq (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016) pipeline by adding the possibility to filter for a set of reference scaffolds. The updated pipeline is available at GitHub (https://github.com/steuernb/MutChromSeq). In the specific case of Rph1, we used available mapping information. In relation to the barley reference genome sequence of cv Morex (Mascher et al., 2017), this was on chromosome 2H between nucleotide positions 13,139,911 bp and 14,361,439 bp. All genes that had been annotated within that interval were aligned to scaffolds from our Sudan assembly of 2H. The list of scaffolds with the best alignment for each gene were used as an additional filter for the updated MutChromSeq pipeline. The Sudan 2H assembly was masked for repeats using RepeatMasker (http://repeatmasker.org) with external repeat library TREP (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ITMI/Repeats; Wicker et al., 2002). Raw data from flow-sorted chromosomes of wild type and mutants were quality-trimmed using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014). Trimmed reads were aligned to repeat-masked reference using the software BWA (Li and Durbin, 2009), version 0.7.12. Mappings were further processed using SAMtools (Li et al., 2009), version 0.1.19, and the following subprograms; parameters diverging from default are mentioned below: samtools view -Shub -f 2 input.sam output.bam; samtools sort; samtools rmdup; samtools index; samtools mpileup -B -Q 0 -f Sudan_2H.masked.fasta. Pileup formatted files for wild type and mutants were converted to MutChromSeq input with Pileup2XML.jar -c 5 -a 0.7. Finally, MutChromSeq.jar was executed with -n 2 -c 5 -a 0.1 -z 1. The candidate contig was manually inspected using IGV (http://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/book/export/html/6).
Phylogenetic Analysis
The predicted Rph1 amino acid sequence was used as a query in GenBank using the program BlastP to identify closely related sequences. The Rph1 amino acid sequence was then compared with that of related NLR sequences from Triticeae including: Aegilops tauschii (Ata) Lr21-AAP74647.1 and Sr33-AGQ17384.1), Secale cereale (Sc; Sr50-ALO61074.1), Triticum aestivum (Ta; Lr22a-ARO38244.1, Sr22-CUM44212.1, Lr1-ABS29034.1, Sr45-CUM44213.1, Pm2-CZT14023.1, Pm3-ADH04488.1, and Pm8-AGY30894.1), T. urartu (Tu; RPM1-like EMS67965.1), T. monococcum subsp. monococcum (Tm; Sr35-AGP75918.1 and MLA1-ADX06722.1), T. dicoccoides (Td; Lr10-ADM65840.1), and H. vulgare (Hv; MLA1-AAG37354.1, MLA6-CAC29242.1, and MLA9-ACZ65487.1). An unrelated NLR from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), At5g45510-Q8VZC7.2, was included as an out-group. A multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW (Larkin et al., 2007), in Geneious version 11.0.2 (https://www.geneious.com) with the BLOSUM scoring matrix, and settings of gap creation at −10 cost, and gap extension at −0.1 cost per element. After removing all ambiguously aligned regions using trimAl (Capella-Gutiérrez et al., 2009) the final sequence alignment of length 1,026 amino acids (n = 19) was determined. A phylogenetic tree based on this alignment was then inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method in the Geneious Tree Builder software, employing the Jukes-Cantor genetic distance model. Bootstrap support for individual nodes was generated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates.
Accession Numbers
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL under accession number MK376319.
Supplemental Data
The following supplemental materials are available.
Supplemental Figure S1. Genome-wide MTA analysis in the CI 9214/Stirling DH population.
Supplemental Figure S2. Biparametric flow karyotype of barley cv Sudan.
Supplemental Figure S3. Sequence comparison at the Rph1 locus between the Morex reference and wild-type resistance donor cv Sudan.
Supplemental Figure S4. Infection response of seven barley accessions postulated to carry leaf rust resistance gene Rph1.
Supplemental Table S1. Summary table of most closely associated DArT-Seq markers at the Rph1 locus on chromosome 2H.
Supplemental Table S2. Assessment of sequence assembly quality for chromosome 2H in barley cvs Foma (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2016) and Sudan and chromosome 2D in wheat cv Campala (Thind et al., 2017) using (A) Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs and (B) mapping all predicted HC genes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Jan Vrána for chromosome sorting using flow cytometry and Ms. Zdeňka Dubská, Jitka Weiserová, Romana Šperková, and Helena Tvardíková for technical assistance.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (National Program of Sustainability I award LO 1204 to J.B., M.K., R.S., and J.D.), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (Designing Future Wheat Cross-Institute Strategic Programme grant BB/P016855/1 to B.B.W. and B.S.), and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GDRC) and RFP by the Judith & David Coffey Chair of Sustainable Agriculture (to P.M.D., D.S., H.E., B.C., S.H., and P.Z.).
Articles can be viewed without a subscription.
References
- Arora S, Steuernagel B, Chandramohan S, Long Y, Matny O, Johnson R, Enk J, Periyannan S, Hatta AM, Athiyannan N, et al. (2018) Resistance gene discovery and cloning by sequence capture and association genetics. bioRxiv [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bendahmane A, Farnham G, Moffett P, Baulcombe DC (2002) Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat protein encoded at the Rx locus of potato. Plant J 32: 195–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30: 2114–2120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brun H, Chèvre AM, Fitt BD, Powers S, Besnard AL, Ermel M, Huteau V, Marquer B, Eber F, Renard M, Andrivon D (2010) Quantitative resistance increases the durability of qualitative resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica napus. New Phytol 185: 285–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T (2009) trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25: 1972–1973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandler PM, Harding CA (2013) “Overgrowth” mutants in barley and wheat: New alleles and phenotypes of the “Green Revolution” DELLA gene. J Exp Bot 64: 1603–1613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman JA, Ho I, Sunkara S, Luo S, Schroth GP, Rokhsar DS (2011) Meraculous: De novo genome assembly with short paired-end reads. PLoS One 6: e23501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chavan S, Gray J, Smith SM (2015) Diversity and evolution of Rp1 rust resistance genes in four maize lines. Theor Appl Genet 128: 985–998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dean R, van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, Di Pietro A, Spanu PD, Rudd JJ, Dickman M, Kahmann R, Ellis J, et al. (2012) The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13: 414–430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dodds PN, Lawrence GJ, Ellis JG (2001) Six amino acid changes confined to the leucine-rich repeat β-strand/β-turn motif determine the difference between the P and P2 rust resistance specificities in flax. Plant Cell 13: 163–178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doležel J, Binarová P, Lucretti S (1989) Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biol Plant 31: 113–120 [Google Scholar]
- Dracatos PM, Khatkar MS, Singh D, Park RF (2014) Genetic mapping of a new race specific resistance allele effective to Puccinia hordei at the Rph9/Rph12 locus on chromosome 5HL in barley. BMC Plant Biol 14: 1598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feuillet C, Travella S, Stein N, Albar L, Nublat A, Keller B (2003) Map-based isolation of the leaf rust disease resistance gene Lr10 from the hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15253–15258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franckowiak JD, Jin Y, Steffenson BJ (1992) Recommended allele symbols for leaf rust resistance genes in barley. Barley Gen Newsl 27: 36–44 [Google Scholar]
- Fu D, Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Blechl A, Epstein L, Chen X, Sela H, Fahima T, Dubcovsky J (2009) A kinase-START gene confers temperature-dependent resistance to wheat stripe rust. Science 323: 1357–1360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Report 13: 207–209 [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh S, Watson A, Gonzalez-Navarro OE, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Yanes L, Mendoza-Suárez M, Simmonds J, Wells R, Rayner T, Green P, et al. (2018) Speed breeding in growth chambers and glasshouses for crop breeding and model plant research. BioRxiv [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giorgi D, Farina A, Grosso V, Gennaro A, Ceoloni C, Lucretti S (2013) FISHIS: fluorescence in situ hybridization in suspension and chromosome flow sorting made easy. PLoS One 8: e57994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (2018) Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361: 661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawashima CG, Guimarães GA, Nogueira SR, MacLean D, Cook DR, Steuernagel B, Baek J, Bouyioukos C, Melo Bdo V, Tristão G, et al. (2016) A pigeon pea gene confers resistance to Asian soybean rust in soybean. Nat Biotechnol 34: 661–665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kislev ME. (1982) Stem rust of wheat 3300 years old found in Israel. Science 216: 993–994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koller T, Brunner S, Herren G, Hurni S, Keller B (2018) Pyramiding of transgenic Pm3 alleles in wheat results in improved powdery mildew resistance in the field. Theor Appl Genet 131: 861–871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kourelis J, van der Hoorn RAL (2018) Defended to the nines: 25 years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function. Plant Cell 30: 285–299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krattinger SG, Lagudah ES, Spielmeyer W, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, McFadden H, Bossolini E, Selter LL, Keller B (2009) A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323: 1360–1363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuang H, Wei F, Marano MR, Wirtz U, Wang X, Liu J, Shum WP, Zaborsky J, Tallon LJ, Rensink W, et al. (2005) The R1 resistance gene cluster contains three groups of independently evolving, type I R1 homologues and shows substantial structural variation among haplotypes of Solanum demissum. Plant J 44: 37–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinform 23: 2947–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leipe DD, Koonin EV, Aravind L (2004) STAND, a class of P-loop NTPases including animal and plant regulators of programmed cell death: Multiple, complex domain architectures, unusual phyletic patterns, and evolution by horizontal gene transfer. J Mol Biol 343: 1–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lysák MA, Cíhalíková J, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Künzel G, Doležel J (1999) Flow karyotyping and sorting of mitotic chromosomes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Chromosome Res 7: 431–444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mago R, Zhang P, Vautrin S, Šimková H, Bansal U, Luo MC, Rouse M, Karaoglu H, Periyannan S, Kolmer J, et al. (2015) The wheat Sr50 gene reveals rich diversity at a cereal disease resistance locus. Nat Plants 1: 15186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mago R, Till B, Periyannan S, Yu G, Wulff BBH, Lagudah E (2017) Generation of loss-of-function mutants for wheat rust disease resistance gene cloning. Methods Mol Biol 1659: 199–205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marchal C, Zhang J, Zhang P, Fenwick P, Steuernagel B, Adamski NM, Boyd L, McIntosh R, Wulff BBH, Berry S, et al. (2018) BED-domain-containing immune receptors confer diverse resistance spectra to yellow rust. Nat Plants 4: 662–668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mascher M, Gundlach H, Himmelbach A, Beier S, Twardziok SO, Wicker T, Radchuk V, Dockter C, Hedley PE, Russell J, et al. (2017) A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544: 427–433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGrann GRD, Smith PH, Burt C, Mateos GR, Chama TN, MacCormack R, Wessels E, Agenbag G, Boyd LA (2014) Genomic and genetic analysis of the wheat race-specific yellow rust resistance gene Yr5. J Plant Sci Mol Breed 3: 1–11 [Google Scholar]
- Moore JW, Herrera-Foessel S, Lan C, Schnippenkoetter W, Ayliffe M, Huerta-Espino J, Lillemo M, Viccars L, Milne R, Periyannan S, et al. (2015) A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat Genet 47: 1494–1498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noël L, Moores TL, van der Biezen EA, Parniske M, Daniels MJ, Parker JE, Jones JD (1999) Pronounced intraspecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resistance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11: 2099–2112 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park RF. (2003) Pathogenic specialisation and pathotype distribution of Puccinia hordei Otth. in Australia, 1992–2001. Plant Dis 87: 1311–1316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park RF, Karakousis A (2002) Characterisation and mapping of gene Rph19 conferring resistance to Puccinia hordei in the cultivar Reka 1 and several Australian barleys. Plant Breed 121: 232–236 [Google Scholar]
- Park RF, Golegaonkar PG, Derevnina L, Sandhu KS, Karaoglu H, Elmansour HM, Dracatos PM, Singh D (2015) Leaf rust of cultivated barley: Pathology and control. Annu Rev Phytopathol 53: 565–589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Periyannan S, Moore J, Ayliffe M, Bansal U, Wang X, Huang L, Deal K, Luo M, Kong X, Bariana H, et al. (2013) The gene Sr33, an ortholog of barley Mla genes, encodes resistance to wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science 341: 786–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roane CW, Starling TM (1967) Inheritance of reaction to Puccinia hordei in barley. II. Gene symbols for loci in differential cultivars. Phytopathology 57: 66–68 [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Martín J, Steuernagel B, Ghosh S, Herren G, Hurni S, Adamski N, Vrána J, Kubaláková M, Krattinger SG, Wicker T, et al. (2016) Rapid gene isolation in barley and wheat by mutant chromosome sequencing. Genome Biol 17: 221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarris PF, Cevik V, Dagdas G, Jones JD, Krasileva KV (2016) Comparative analysis of plant immune receptor architectures uncovers host proteins likely targeted by pathogens. BMC Biol 14: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM (2015) BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31: 3210–3212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Šimková H, Svensson JT, Condamine P, Hribová E, Suchánková P, Bhat PR, Bartoš J, Safár J, Close TJ, Doležel J (2008) Coupling amplified DNA from flow-sorted chromosomes to high-density SNP mapping in barley. BMC Genomics 9: 294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stadler LJ. (1928) Mutations in barley induced by x-rays and radium. Science 68: 186–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steuernagel B, Periyannan SK, Hernández-Pinzón I, Witek K, Rouse MN, Yu G, Hatta A, Ayliffe M, Bariana H, Jones JD, et al. (2016) Rapid cloning of disease-resistance genes in plants using mutagenesis and sequence capture. Nat Biotechnol 34: 652–655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steuernagel B, Vrána J, Karafiátová M, Wulff BBH, Doležel J (2017) Rapid gene isolation using MutChromSeq. Methods Mol Biol 1659: 231–243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steuernagel B, Witek K, Krattinger SG, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Schonbeek HJ, Yu G, Baggs E, Witek AI, Yadav I, Krasileva KV, et al. (2018) Physical and transcriptional organisation of the bread wheat intracellular immune receptor repertoire. bioRxiv [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thind AK, Wicker T, Šimková H, Fossati D, Moullet O, Brabant C, Vrána J, Doležel J, Krattinger SG (2017) Rapid cloning of genes in hexaploid wheat using cultivar-specific long-range chromosome assembly. Nat Biotechnol 35: 793–796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thind AK, Wicker T, Müller T, Ackermann PM, Steuernagel B, Wulff BBH, Spannagl M, Twardziok SO, Felder M, Lux T, et al. (2018) Chromosome-scale comparative sequence analysis unravels molecular mechanisms of genome dynamics between two wheat cultivars. Genome Biol 19: 104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tornero P, Chao RA, Luthin WN, Goff SA, Dangl JL (2002) Large-scale structure-function analysis of the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance protein. Plant Cell 14: 435–450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torp J, Jørgensen JH (1986) Modification of barley powdery mildew resistance gene Ml-a12 by induced mutation. Can J Genet Cytol 28: 725–731 [Google Scholar]
- Tuleen IA, McDaniel ME (1971) Location of genes Pa and Pa5. Barley Newsl 15: 106–107 [Google Scholar]
- Uauy C, Wulff BBH, Dubcovsky J (2017) Combining traditional mutagenesis with new high-throughput sequencing and genome editing to reveal hidden variation in polyploid wheat. Annu Rev Genet 51: 435–454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watson A, Ghosh S, Williams MJ, Cuddy WS, Simmonds J, Rey M-D, Asyraf Md Hatta M, Hinchliffe A, Steed A, Reynolds D, et al. (2018) Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat Plants 4: 23–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei F, Wing RA, Wise RP (2002) Genome dynamics and evolution of the Mla (powdery mildew) resistance locus in barley. Plant Cell 14: 1903–1917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicker T, Matthews DE, Keller B (2002) TREP: A database for Triticeae repetitive elements. Trends Plant Sci 7: 561–562 [Google Scholar]
- Xing L, Hu P, Liu J, Witek K, Zhou S, Xu J, Zhou W, Gao L, Huang Z, Zhang R, et al. (2018) Pm21 from Haynaldia villosa encodes a CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring powdery mildew resistance in wheat. Mol Plant 11: 874–878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang P, McIntosh RA, Hoxha S, Dong C (2009) Wheat stripe rust resistance genes Yr5 and Yr7 are allelic. Theor Appl Genet 120: 25–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




