Table 2.
Total | Voucher Treatment (Combined) | Control Group | Missing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | % |
Past 30 Day Binge Drinking † | 0.037 | 0.229 | 0.039 | 0.236 | 0.032 | 0.212 | 1.38% |
Lifetime Alcohol Use † | 0.301 | 0.557 | 0.301 | 0.559 | 0.301 | 0.552 | 0.67% |
Past 30 Day Alcohol Use † | 0.128 | 0.406 | 0.130 | 0.411 | 0.124 | 0.396 | 0.95% |
Past 30 Day Number of Days Drank Alcohol | 0.423 | 2.256 | 0.440 | 2.317 | 0.386 | 2.114 | 0.95% |
Past 30 Day Total Number of Drinks | 1.809 | 19.450 | 2.158 | 22.792 | 1.013 | 7.989 | 1.31% |
Past 30 Day youth drank alcohol before or during work or school † | 0.019 | 0.167 | 0.020 | 0.171 | 0.017 | 0.158 | 1.27% |
Past 30 day average number of drinks on days drank | 0.303 | 1.269 | 0.323 | 1.340 | 0.258 | 1.094 | 1.31% |
NOTES: This table presents bivariate results. Means are weighted for varying treatment random assignment ratios across time, and for attrition. Variables marked by a † are binary, so means represent proportions. Nondrinkers assigned to zero. Combined voucher treatment indicates that the low-poverty and section 8 voucher groups were combined into one group. There are no statistically-significant differences between voucher and control groups overall (when collapsed on gender).