Abstract
Stomata are adjustable pores in the aerial epidermis of plants. The role of stomata is usually described in terms of the trade-off between CO2 uptake and water loss. Little consideration has been given to their interaction with below-ground development or diffusion of other gases. We overexpressed the rice EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR1 (OsEPF1) to produce rice plants with reduced stomatal densities, resulting in lowered leaf stomatal conductance and enhanced water use efficiency. Surprisingly, we found that root cortical aerenchyma (RCA) is formed constitutively in OsEPF1OE lines regardless of tissue age and position. Aerenchyma is tissue containing air-spaces that can develop in the plant root during stressful conditions, e.g. oxygen deficiency when it functions to increase O2 diffusion from shoot to root. The relationship with stomata is unknown. We conclude that RCA development and stomatal development are linked by two possible mechanisms: first that reduced stomatal conductance inhibits the diffusion of oxygen to the root, creating an oxygen deficit and stimulating the formation of RCA, second that an unknown EPF signalling pathway may be involved. Our observations have fundamental implications for the understanding of whole plant gas diffusion and root-to-shoot signalling events.
Subject terms: Plant physiology, Flooding, Stomata
Introduction
Stomata act as gatekeepers that control gaseous diffusion between plants and the aerial environment. They play a critical role in responding to water deficit, maintaining high rates of gas exchange, regulating plant water use efficiency (WUE) and permitting nutrient uptake from roots via the transpiration stream. Stomatal apertures are responsive to environmental cues such as light, temperature, humidity and atmospheric CO2 concentration, and to intrinsically derived signals such as abscisic acid1–3. Stomatal development is also influenced by changes in the environment, resulting in altered stomatal density and/or size. These developmental adjustments, are controlled by both local and/or long distance signals, leading potentially to altered leaf gas exchange properties4–6. This high level of physiological and developmental plasticity makes stomata an attractive target for studies into the adaptation of crops to future environments.
Aerial and subterranean plant parts are functionally coordinated. First, stomata drive the process of water uptake from the roots by generating a substantial water potential differential through transpiration. This is accompanied by morphological coordination, for example there is a correlation between root length density and leaf area7. Recent evidence has also shown an association between high stomatal density and a larger root area8 suggesting that a sophisticated level of co-ordination exists between above and below ground organs. There is little evidence that stomata provide direct signals for root development even though such a function could be an efficient means of providing appropriate whole plant responses to sub optimal environmental (aerial) conditions. Nevertheless various genes and transcription factors have been implicated in the co-regulation of root and shoot development through the common systemic signals such as plant hormones (e.g auxin and cytokinins) and sugars9–11. Examples include the auxin-responsive MORE AXILLARY GROWTH (MAX)12 and the carotenoid derived BYPASS113 genes.
In addition to photosynthesis and transpiration, a less well-characterised role for stomata is to provide oxygen to the roots via diffusion along specialised spongy tissue containing air spaces known as aerenchyma. Over a century ago, Sachs14 named two types of aerenchyma according to their method of formation: schizogeny results in cortical cell separation and differential cell expansion while lysigeny results in cell death and subsequent lysis of some cortical cells to form air space. Lysigenous aerenchyma is common among the cereal crops such as rice (Oryza sativa L.)15,16, maize (Zea mays)17,18, barley (Hordeum vulgare)19,20 and wheat (Triticum aestivum)21. Air spaces are formed specifically in the root cortex, after the content of the cells that form the lysigenous aerenchyma becomes partially digested, leaving the surrounding cell wall. Some small cells remain intact and these provide structural shape and nutrient transport (apoplastic and symplastic)22.
Aerenchyma tissue is formed either as part of normal plant development, or in response to abiotic stresses associated with hypoxia23, high temperature, drought24,25 or nutrient deficiency26. It also occurs in plants experiencing flooding or submergence which leads to enhanced internal diffusion of atmospheric and photosynthetic O2 from aerial regions to the flooded roots, thereby maintaining aerobic root respiration27,28. Additional functions of aerenchyma may include the diminution of carbohydrate and O2 consuming cells (the respiratory ‘burden’) and the ventilation of gases such as CO2 and methane from the roots to shoots29.
Unlike many other cereal crops, rice is highly tolerant to waterlogging. It has the ability to grow in water laden (paddy) fields where excessive water often limits oxygen diffusion in the soil30. Therefore, rice provides a good model system for studying the mechanisms that permit an efficient supply of air from the above ground canopy to the below ground root zone. However, the coordinating signalling pathways that permit the morphological changes associated with growth under such conditions are not well studied. Here we investigate the relationship between stomatal properties and root development using rice lines that overexpress EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 1 (OsEPF1) or EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-Like 9 (OsEPFL9).
In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), at least three genes: EPF1, EPF2 and EPFL9/STOMAGEN encode small secretory peptides that regulate stomatal development and spacing31,32. These peptides compete for the binding of the transmembrane receptor leucine-rich repeat receptor like kinases (LRR-RLKs), ERECTA (ER), ERECTA-LIKE (ERL) 1 and/or ERL2; interactions which are governed by the presence of the LRR-receptor-like protein TOO MANY MOUTHS (TMM)31,32 that acts as a specificity switch for the regulation of stomatal development33. EPF1 and EPF2 negatively regulate stomatal development; EPF2 primarily by preventing asymetric entry divisions early in the stomatal lineage; EPF1 primarily by preventing stomatal clustering later in the lineage. EPFL9/STOMAGEN on the other hand, which is expressed in the mesophyll tissues34, acts as a positive regulator by blocking EPF1 and EPF2 from binding to ERECTA family receptors (ERfs)33,35. By manipulating the expression of EPF1, EPF2 and/or EPFL9 it is possible to drastically alter stomatal density. Indeed, overexpression of EPFL9 results in increased stomatal density31, whereas overexpression of EPF1 or EPF2 results not only in reduced stomatal density but also lowers leaf stomatal conductance and increases leaf and plant water use efficiency4,36–38.
Here we show that overexpression of OsEPF1 in rice results in reduced stomatal density whereas overexpression of OsEPFL9 increases stomatal density. Remarkably OsEPF1 overexpression also leads to constitutively generated lysigenous aerenchyma regardless of soil media aeration or tissue oxygen content. Our experiments show that aerenchyma formation in the non-transgenic rice is normally dependent on the oxygen content of the root growth medium. These results demonstrate novel physiological and developmental links between root and shoot responses to abiotic stress.
Methods
Generation of the ectopically overexpressing OsEPF1 and OsEPFL9 rice lines
OsEFP1 (Os04g54490) and OsEPFL9 (Os01g68598) cDNA sequences were cloned into pCR-8/GW/TOPO entry vectors and then into pBRACT214 vectors via LR reactions39. pBRACT214 contains the maize (Zea mays) ubiquitin promoter and a hygromycin resistance cassette. Constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium by electroporation and introduced into rice through Agrobacterium mediated rice transformation of mature embryos (Oryza sativa L. japonica cvs. Nipponbare background) as described by Toki et al.40 with some modifications. The presence of the transgene was confirmed by PCR using transgene specific primer combinations (a ubiquitin promoter specific forward primer and EPF gene specific reverse primer) with expression levels verified by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR, see Supplementary Table 1).
Plant growth
Seeds were surfaced sterilized with 0.5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite, rinsed thoroughly and subsequently germinated on moist filter paper in 9 cm petri dishes at 30 °C and a photoperiod of 13 hours for one week in an incubator (A1000, Conviron, Winnipeg). Germinated seedlings were transferred to a controlled environment chamber described previously41. Illumination was provided by 400 W metal halide lamps with a photoperiod of 12 hours, temperature of 28 °C/26 °C (day/night) and relative humidity of 70% ± 5% throughout. Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was 400 µmol m−2 s−1 at plant height.
For the water restriction experiment, surface sterilized seeds were placed directly on to germinating plugs on a module tray for 7–10 days before being transferred to 3 L pots containing rice growth compost which was a mixture of John Innes No. 1 (John Innes, Norwich UK) and Levington M3 (JFC Monro, Devon, UK) in a ratio of 50:50 (w:w) and a slow releasing fertiliser mix (Osmocote, Scotts, LLC, Ohio). Water restriction was applied at two growth stages; 5-weeks and 8-weeks after germination and lasted for 8 and 7 days respectively. Soil water measurements were taken daily using a theta-probe from Delta T (Cambridge, UK). Control (well-watered) plants and treated plants were randomised within the growth chamber.
For experiments using hydroponically grown plants, the germinating seeds were transferred into media with a full complement of nutrients in light proof 20 L tubs as described previously41. For oxygen-deficient conditions, no gas was applied to the containers. For oxygenated conditions, air was continually bubbled into the media using aquarium pumps. The dissolved oxygen level was measured using a portable oxygen meter (YSI Pro20 Xylem Inc, USA). Transformed and control plants were randomised within each tub (11 plants per tub) and the position of each tub was randomised within the growth chamber.
Stomatal density
Stomatal impressions were made on mature, fully expanded leaves using dental resin (Coltene President Plus Jet, Colten Whaledent, Switzerland) as described previously42. Stomatal size (µm2) was calculated using ImageJ (v1.49) as the guard cell length × guard cell pair width6 from images collected at x40 magnification. Typically, five to six plants per genotype and four measurements per leaf were examined in the central portion of the leaf, between midrib and margin.
Leaf gas exchange measurements
All leaf gas exchange measurements were taken on the uppermost, fully expanded leaf using an infra-red gas analyser (IRGA), Licor 6400XT (Licor inc, Illinois, Nebraska). Three types of measurements were made: single measurements of photosynthesis (A) at light-saturation (Amax), Photosynthesis versus intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, A/Ci) analysis and light response curves as described previously41,43. Except where noted, measurements were made under light saturated conditions. The block temperature was maintained at 28 °C, the flow rate 500 ml min−1 and 60–65% humidity. The CO2 concentration used was 400 µmol mol−1 (except where noted) and PPFD 1500 µmol m−2 s−1. Measurements took between 2 and 3 minutes to achieve stability. The leaf instantaneous water use efficiency (IWUE) and intrinsic water use efficiency values (iWUE) were obtained from the ratio of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (A) to stomatal conductance (gs), and A to leaf transpiration (E) respectively.
Leaf dehydration assays
The IRGA auto-logged measurements every 30 seconds in 8 week-old plants (conditions described above). Typically, immediately after the first steady state measurement was obtained, the leaf was excised from the plant at about 5 mm away from the chamber gasket. Logging of gas exchange values of the leaf in the chamber continued as the excised leaf underwent water loss. The values obtained were normalised on the initial pre-excision value. A second assay used the same principle but measured leaf weight progressively after excision. A fully expanded leaf of known area (5 cm2 in 4–5 week-old and 7 cm2 in 8 week old) was excised and immediately weighed at 15 second intervals for 10 minutes. RWC was measured as described previously43.
Root sectioning and imaging
Root samples (3.5–4 cm in length) from 15, 30 and 60 day old plants were obtained from three different positions of the seminal and adventitious roots (2 cm, 6 cm and 13 cm from the root tip). The root samples were collected in water and were placed in custom-designed polylactic acid molds and embedded with 4–5% agarose gel as described in Atkinson and Wells44. 150–180 µm thick sections of agarose embedded roots were cut using a Vibrating Microtome Ci 7000smz-2 (Campden Instruments Ltd, England) with blade frequency of 65 Hz. Sections were stained with Calcofluor-white (0.3 mg ml−1) for 1–3 minutes and rinsed with deionised water.
Root sections were imaged using an Eclipse Ti CLSM confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc, USA) using excitation and emission wavelengths of 440 nm and 540 nm respectively. Open source image software packages Fiji45 and ImageJ were used for image processing. The Root Scan v2.0 software (Penn State, College of Agricultural Science, USA) was used to generate root anatomical primary measurements based on pixel number. It was also used to calculate secondary measurements (e.g. percentage of the cortical area made up of aerenchyma air spaces) as described in Burton et al.46. Root parameters such as root total length, average root diameter, root surface area and root volume were obtained from scanned images of roots using a commercial software package WinRHIZO v6.1 (Regent instruments, Canada) as described in Himmelbauer47.
RNA extractions, cDNA synthesis and Reverse transcription (RT) and qRT-PCR
RNA extractions were performed on 8-day old above ground seedlings or 30 day old adventitious root samples. Spectrum™ Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) for seedlings, or TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) for root samples were used to extract RNA. Both sets of samples were treated using the Sigma On-Column DNase I Digestion Set. For root samples, 15 µl of eluted RNA was mixed with 500 µl of Spectrum™ Plant Total RNA Kit binding buffer and the manufacturers protocol was subsequently followed. All samples were standardised to 100 ng µl−1 and cDNA synthesis was performed with 18 bp oligo dTs using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA).
RT-PCR was performed using OneTaq® Quick-Load® 2X Master Mix with Standard Buffer (NEB, USA) using approx. 25 ng of cDNA. For qRT-PCR, analysis was performed using the Qiagen Rotor-Gene SYBR® Green PCR Kit on a Corbett RG-6000 real-time cycler (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using approx. 10 ng of cDNA. All primers used were tested using seedling cDNA to verify performance with qRT-PCR dilution curves produced for each primer pair. For seedling analysis, the Profilin (Os06g05880) housekeeping gene was used. For roots, the Profilin and TFIIEβ (Transcription initiation factor IIE, Os10g25770) genes were used (Supplementary Table 1). Data was interpreted as in Luna et al.48 and Caine et al.4.
Root elongation rate
Five -day old seedlings were transferred into a sealed 12 × 12 cm petri plate with one side removed for the plant shoots to grow outside the plate. The plates were filled with liquid hydroponic media (as above) and positioned vertically (at 90° to horizontal). The position of the root tip was marked on the plate. The plates were transferred into a controlled growth room. Images were taken every 6 hr using an automated image acquisition system49. Distance travelled by root per unit time was then used for the calculation of average root elongation rate (within the plate)50.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.01 for Windows (La Jolla, CA, USA) and GenStat for windows, 17th Edition (VSN International Ltd.). Analysis of variance (ANOVA, one-way and two-way) with Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure were used except where indicated. Student’s t-tests were used in comparisons of RWC, SWC and leaf temperature. Pearson correlation analysis was applied.
Results
EPF/L overexpression results in altered stomatal density and size
OsEPF1 and OsEPFL9 transgenic lines were produced through Agrobacterium mediated rice transformation40. The presence of the transgene in the primary transformants was checked by genomic DNA PCR which revealed that 21 out of 24 putative OsEPF1 overexpression lines and 17 out of 21 OsEPFL9 overexpression lines were transgene positive. Selected positive lines were initially checked for the expression of the transgene by RT-PCR and subsequently by qRT-PCR. Results showed that the expression level of OsEPF1 (lines 3 and 4) and OsEPFL9 (lines 1, 15 and 19) were significantly higher in these lines than the WT by about 50 and 35 fold, respectively (Fig. 1a).
Studies in Arabidopsis, barley and poplar (Populus tomentosa) show that the overexpression of EPF/L genes results in changes in stomatal density31,51,52. In our experiments with the Nipponbare cultivar of rice, OsEPF1 and OsEPFL9 overexpression (OE) lines were created and stomatal density was measured. These results are consistent with previous work indicating OsEPF1 and OsEPFL9 perform signalling roles in rice4,53,54. The two independent EPF1 overexpression lines assessed both showed significant reductions in stomatal density (67% reduction in line 3 and 62% in line 4). For line 3 this equated to a 61% reduction on the adaxial leaf surface and a 71% reduction on the abaxial surface. For line 4 the reductions were slightly lower at 55% and 67% respectively. In contrast, overexpression of OsEPFL9 resulted in a significant increase in stomatal density in both lines measured, with line 1 showing an overall increase of 28% (Abaxial, 22%; Adaxial, 35%) (Fig. 1b,e,f). Changes in density on both leaf surfaces were accompanied by increased stomatal size in OsEPF1OE lines and reduced stomatal size in the OsEPFL9OE lines (Fig. 1c). This strong inverse relationship between stomatal density and size (Fig. 1d), is consistent with results from a number of other species36. Interestingly, a recent study using OsEPF1 overexpression in the IR64 rice cultivar displayed an opposite stomatal size effect in reduced stomatal density plants, with smaller rather than larger stomata4 forming, suggestive of different modes of regulation for stomatal size between Nipponbare and IR64.
Altered stomatal density does not significantly alter photosynthesis in OsEPF1 or OsEPFL9 transgenic lines
To understand how altering stomatal density alters leaf gas exchange properties we undertook IRGA measurements at 400 ppm CO2 on the leaves of 5 week-old plants (Fig. 2). Plants with lower stomatal densities (OsEPF1OE) had significantly reduced gs and E comparative to transgene negative controls (P < 0.05). There was also a trend towards lower A in OsEPF1OE lines but this was not statistically significant. In comparison, OsEPFL9OE plants showed no significant differences in A, gs or E. Calculation of intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE, A/gs) revealed OsEPF1OE lines had significantly increased iWUE, but for OsEPFL9OE lines, values were comparable to controls. We conclude that water loss via gs is reduced as a result of lowered stomatal density, and it is this change more so than adjustments in A that lead to improved iWUE. Light response curves confirmed that there were no differences in light compensation point or dark respiration between WT and either OsEPF1OE or OsEPFL9OE plants (Supplementary Fig. 1). Whilst WT and OsEPF1OE plants had similar quantum yield, OsEPFL9OE plants had significantly higher quantum yield than WT (P = 0.003) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Supplementary Fig. 2 shows that the differences in iWUE between OsEPF1OE and control were also present at low light intensities (<200 μmol m−2 s−1).
Reducing stomatal density slows leaf dehydration, enhances drought tolerance and soil water conservation
The effect of altered stomatal density on rapid water loss by leaf excision was investigated. Leaf weight declined most rapidly in the control plants, with OsEPF1OE plants showing a greater ability to retain water at 30 and 60 seconds after excision (P = 0.00458 and P = 0.0446 respectively) (Fig. 3a). The performance of OsEPFL9OE line did not significantly differ from WT. When gs was assessed, OsEPF1OE leaves were slower to decline with significant differences at 120, 180 and 220 seconds after excission (P = 0.0109, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0176 respectively), indicating that the rate of weight loss was due to a slower rate of water loss (Fig. 3b).
To further test if altered stomatal density affected responses to a water deficit, drought was imposed on the OsEPF1OE and WT plants at two growth stages (see methods). The soil water content (SWC) of plants droughted from 5 weeks post germination declined over the period of drought (Fig. 4a) and was consistently higher in OsEPF1OE than the WT throughout (P = 0.0315). On day 8 the SWC in OsEPF1OE was almost twice that of the control plants (P = 0.0474). Consistent with the finding that low stomatal density plants have lower gs and E, leaf temperature was also monitored and found to be initially significantly higher in OsEPF1OE plants, but this was reversed by day 6 when the SWC dropped below 40% in all plants (Fig. 4b). Tiller number and whole plant leaf area were not significantly different between the WT and the OsEPF1OE lines (Supplementary Fig. 3). We conclude that the reduced gs and E in OsEPF1OE lines led to greater soil water retention, which in-turn resulted in OsEPF1OE plants being able to maintain a higher rate of transpiration for longer, thereby preventing leaf temperatures from increasing as in WT under droughted conditions.
The drought treatment (Fig. 4) directly resulted in a reduction in leaf relative water content (RWC; Fig. 5) with less severe changes observed in OsEPF1OE plants. Under well-watered control plants (for both the 5 and 8 week old drought experiments) both WT and OsEPF1OE maintained approximately 95% leaf RWC. The RWC of all droughted plants was examined on day 6 of the drought with OsEPF1OE plants having significantly higher RWC than WT during both drought treatments (P = 0.0156 and P = 0.0058 respectively) (Fig. 5). Gas exchange was recorded over the 8 days of drought stress and recovery (Supplementary Fig. 4). Whilst typical drought-dependent declines in A and gs were observed for both the WT and OsEPF1OE, significantly higher A and gs values were observed in OsEPF1OE plants after day 5 (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0372). This gs response is consistent with our results indicating slower water loss in Fig. 3. Although not significantly different, OsEPF1OE plants also appeared to show more rapid rates of recovery than WT upon re-watering (Supplementary Fig. 4). Once again, these data indicate the importance of gs and stomatal density in soil water conservation to support higher gas exchange values over periods of extended drought.
To further examine leaf gas exchange properties during the drought treatment, A vs Ci measurements were taken and curves fitted using a mechanistic model of A, and the biochemical components of A, Vcmax (maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco) and Jmax (maximum rate of RuBP regeneration) were estimated from a modified curve fitting model (Supplementary Fig. 5). There were no significant differences in Vcmax or Jmax, supporting the data in Fig. 2. Stomatal limitation on A (Ls) was calculated55. The Ls can be viewed as the proportion of the value of A that results from stomatal resistance rather than other factors such as Rubisco activity or electron transport. The Ls was found to be significantly higher in droughted plants compared to well-watered, as expected during partial stomatal closure. During drought, the mean Ls values of OsEPF1OE plants showed a trend toward being lower than controls, but this was not significant (P = 0.4005). Differences in Ls were not necessarily expected, given that the stomatal conductance value during drought may be partially dependent on differences in soil water conservation. The equivalence of Ls between plant types under well-watered conditions is consistent with the observation above that lowered stomatal density reduces gs to a greater extent than A.
Overexpression of OsEPF1 enhances formation of root cortical aerenchyma independently of oxygen availability
To test the role of OsEPF1 and OsEPFL9 overexpression on root cortical aerenchyma formation (RCA), the roots of the OsEPF1 (line 3) and OsEPFL9 (line 1) overexpression lines and the WT were evaluated. The seminal and adventitious roots of 15, 30 and 60 days old plants were examined for RCA formation. The effect of stomatal density and/or OsEPF1 and OsEPFL9 constitutive overexpression on the formation of RCA was evaluated in two positions; 2 cm and 13 cm from the roots tips (Fig. 6). Aerenchyma tissue could be observed in all the three lines tested (WT, OsEPF1OE line 3 and OsEPFL9OE line 1) at all three growth stages but was more widespread in OsEPF1OE.
Measurements of root length, diameter and biomass in 60 day old plants indicated no significant differences between root growth WT, OsEPF1OE and OsEPFL9OE plants (p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 6). We then tested the rate of root elongation using an automated image acquisition system49. The results show no significant difference between the WT and any of the transgenic lines in terms of root length and rate of root elongation up to 144 hours (the same sampling time point as the aerenchyma measurements). Furthermore, there were no differences in root length nor rate of seminal root elongation after 247 hours (Supplementary Fig. 7). We therefore conclude that the root aerenchyma formation observed in the transgenic lines is caused by the over expression of OsEPF1 rather than a developmentally induced change resulting from differences in the rate of root elongation.
We quantified formation of aerenchyma tissue by calculating the % of the cortical area consisting of air spaces using images of root cross-sections. At 2 cm from the root tip (Fig. 6H), 35.7% of the cortical cells in the OsEPF1OE lines were lysigenously digested, forming air spaces whereas OsEPFL9OE and the WT had only 16.5% and 5.8% air spaces respectively in this region. Thus, OsEPF1OE had 83.5% (P < 0.0001) more air space 2 cm above the root apex, in comparison with WT. At 13 cm from the root tip where the aerenchyma was fully established in all the three genotypes, there were no statistically significant differences observed. In OsEPF1OE roots, there was no difference in the percentage of aerenchyma found in the two regions that were sampled. Thus, we conclude that the RCA in OsEPF1OE lines was formed at the early stage of root organogenesis, whereas in the WT and OsEPFL9OE this occurred later.
To fully understand how aeration can influence RCA formation, WT, OsEPF1OE and OsEPFL9OE lines were grown hydroponically in aerated, semi-aerated and non-aerated liquid media (Fig. 7). In the aerated tubs the mean dissolved oxygen (D.O.) level remained at 95 (±2)% throughout tissue sampling, while in the semi aerated conditions oxygen level dropped to 66 (±5)% and the non-aerated condition to 28 (±2)% by week 5. The temperature of the aerated hydroponic tubs (28.7 °C ± 0.1) was significantly lower (P = 0.0109) than the mean temperature of the oxygen-deficient condition (29.4 °C ± 0.2) (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Analysis of air space under aerated (95% D.O) and semi-aerated (66% D.O) conditions revealed that compared to WT controls, OsEPF1OE roots had 56.7% and 68.9% more air space under the same conditions (P = 0.0169 and P < 0.0001) (Fig. 7a–e,g–k,s). On the other hand, OsEPFL9OE plants had similar air space values as WT under both treatments (Fig. 7a–e,m–q,s). Under oxygen-deficient conditions (28% D.O), WT and OsEPFL9OE plants increased air space to compensate for low oxygen content in the root medium, but OsEPF1OE plants did not (Fig. 7c,f,i,l,o,r,s). These results indicate that while both WT and OsEPFL9OE roots adjust their RCA air spaces in responses to water oxygen content, OsEPF1OE do not. Under aerated conditions when there are differences in aerenchyma formation a statistically significant (P = 0.0001 and R2 = 0.3020) negative correlation between stomatal density and % air spaces was detected (Fig. 8).
Discussion
Here we show that overexpression of OsEPF1 in rice results in significantly reduced stomatal density, E and gs, consistent with similar results from rice4 and other species such as Arabidopsis and barley4,31,51. We reveal evidence for enhanced water use efficiency and greater soil water conservation resulting primarily from the aforementioned lower rates of E and gs4. Importantly, the reduced stomatal density of OsEPF1 overexpression has a proportionally greater effect on gs than on A, or any substantial reduction in carbon gain.
Here we unexpectedly observed that OsEPF1 overexpression lines have increased root cortical aerenchyma. Aerenchyma are thought to form in roots during low-oxygen soil conditions to aid oxygen diffusion across plant tissues, in addition to other mechanisms that increase oxygen levels in roots, such as the reduction in Radial Oxygen Loss (ROL) to the soil environment56. Despite the importance of aerenchyma tissue to root function in waterlogged soils and high irrigation agriculture, little is known about how its development is regulated57. Unlike other monocots, lysigenous aerenchyma in rice can form constitutively in mature root tissue under aerobic conditions with the formation toward the root tip being inductively enhanced in response to oxygen deficiency (e.g. waterlogged soil)26,28,58.
Aerenchyma formation has also been observed in roots subjected to drought24,59,60. In maize, loss of aerenchyma has also been correlated with improved growth and grain yield under low P conditions61. The formation of aerenchyma in response to such varied abiotic stimuli (and indeed in different tissues) suggests that it may fulfil more than one function. For example, the loss of cortical tissue might also act to reduce respiratory loss of carbon reserves at a time when photosynthate supply is limited24,59,60. The multifunctional nature of aerenchyma raises new questions concerning the importance of each stimulus, their interaction and the signalling networks involved.
What is the mechanism for the constitutive formation of aerenchyma tissue in OsEPF1OE lines? One explanation may lie in the possible direct role of OsEPF1 in the regulation of signalling processes in the roots. The transgene overexpression in this study was directed by a constitutive promoter, so it is possible that ectopic OsEPF1 expression induced a response directly involved with the development module associated with aerenchyma formation. Indeed, OsEPF1 was highly expressed in the roots of OsEPF1OE lines confirming the potential for EPF1 to alter aerenchyma in our study (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 8). In Arabidopsis roots, the EPFL9-ERECTA module has been shown to regulate cortex cell proliferation by regulating the activity of SPINDLY34. In rice OsEPF1 has also been shown to be upregulated in the roots of a sodium-sensitive rice cultivar (IR29), but not in a sodium tolerant rice cultivar (FL478), on exposure to salt-stress (supplementary data in Senadheera et al.62). These suggest the potential for EPFs to impact on root stress signalling at the local level.
To test whether potential EPF signalling module components are expressed in rice root tissues, we tested the levels of expression of genes known to be involved in stomatal development and patterning including OsER (Os06g10230), OsER2 (Os02g53720), OsERL1 (Os06g03970) and OsTMM (Os01g43440) in both WT and OsEPF1OE plants. We found almost undetectable levels of these transcripts in the roots of all the plants surveyed (Supplementary Fig. 8). Based on this lack of expression of these key genes, we conclude that it is highly improbable that the observed changes in aerenchyma formation in the OsEPF1 over-expression lines (or through translocation of EPF peptides from shoot to the root) occur via EPF1- ER/ER2/ERL1-TMM signalling.
What other signalling pathways could interact to produce the constitutive aerenchyma phenotype? Reactive oxygen species are formed in the root in oxygen-deficient conditions and they have also been implicated in aerenchyma formation63. In Arabidopsis, ROS have been implicated in regulating cortex cell proliferation by regulating the activity of SPINDLY through an EPFL-ERECTA module34. However, we exclude this possibility as i) we did not find detectable expression of ERECTA and ERECTA-like genes in rice roots as discussed above and ii) aerenchyma formation is a distinct and different process to cell proliferation. In wheat, ROS production is ethylene-mediated; ethylene induces expression of genes involved in ROS synthesis and pre-treatment with diphenyleneiodonium (DPI- inhibitor of NADPH oxidase- a key enzyme in ROS synthesis) inhibits ethylene mediated aerenchyma formation. However, we did not find any differences in the expression of NADPH oxidase between WT and OE lines, nor between different oxygenation treatments so we suggest that ROS are unlikely to regulate aerenchyma formation in the EPFOE lines (Supplementary Fig. 9).
In sugarcane, the ethylene-auxin balance has been implicated in root aerenchyma formation64. Thus, one possible mechanism could be through regulation of auxin transport and response in the roots to alter auxin ethylene balance. Auxin transport and activity have been implicated in stomata development65. Auxin response factor MONOPTEROS (ARF5) has been shown to bind directly to the STOMAGEN/EPFL9 promoter and represses its expression to negatively regulate stomata development66. However, such a response in our overexpression lines is unlikely as the EPF/L genes are driven by the exogenous maize ubiquitin promoter. Nonetheless, overexpression of EPF2 in Arabidopsis has been shown to diminish the auxin response during leaf margin morphogenesis further linking EPF/L and auxin function67. At this stage, we cannot rule out a mechanism involving the interplay of auxin, ethylene and EPF/L signalling in regulating root aerenchyma formation.
There may be another mechanism based on physiological constraints to gas diffusion. For example in Arabidopsis, plants overexpressing the OsEPF1 orthologue, EPF2 have been shown to have smaller root areas, which the authors attribute to reduced gs8, suggesting that changes in root development could be driven by changes in plant physiology associated with changes in reduced gaseous diffusion via stomata. The predominant route for oxygen transport (in low-oxygen soils) is from the atmosphere into the leaf and shoot tissue via stomatal pores, from where it diffuses towards the roots, aided by the airspaces formed in the root cortex. To assist this there are also air spaces within the leaf midrib, true stem (culm) and the leaf sheath68. It may be possible that in our OsEPF1OE lines, a reduction in gs as a result of the lowered stomatal density has formed a resistance to oxygen diffusion within the plant, stimulating aerenchyma formation potentially via the ethylene signalling pathway28,58,69–72. Such a mechanism would however be dependent on the roots being unable to absorb large quantities of O2 directly from the hydroponic media. If this was the case, OsEPFL9OE plants may have shown the opposite phenotype (Fig. 7) but in fact the OsEPFL9OE RCA phenotype observed was closer to OsEPF1OE than WT plants under aerated conditions. Ethylene is implicated in the formation of lysigenous aerenchyma in rice, wheat and maize28,58,72 where it accumulates in low oxygen conditions strongly inducing more aerenchyma in both the apical and the basal regions58. Ethylene treatment to roots has been shown to result in further increase in the formation of aerenchyma in rice under aerated conditions28 whereas treatment with ethylene perception inhibitors (e.g. silver ions) decreased the formation of aerenchyma. The treatment of wheat and maize roots with ethylene biosynthesis inhibitors amino ethoxy vinyl glycine, amino-oxyacetic acid, and cobalt chloride blocks the formation of aerenchyma in low-oxygen condition69–71. However, there is currently no direct evidence linking EPF signalling and ethylene-mediated aerenchyma formation.
Finally, and as noted above aerenchyma has been implicated in productivity by reducing respiratory ‘load’ of root tissue. However, it is unclear whether this has bearing on the interpretation of our data. The root biomass data suggests that, if the physiological hypothesis is correct, then the supposed increased access to oxygen was not conferring a growth advantage to the transgenic lines in these experiments.
Conclusions
Plant biology has often studied physiological and molecular events of above ground and below ground development separately in mature plants, even though many examples of whole plant signalling are known73. This is in part due to the difficulty of studying root processes with the same ease as shoots. Recent advances in methodology should enable better understanding of many signalling processes and physiological mechanisms coordinating root and shoot function74. Here we report a novel observation, that the expression of a gene with a key role in the regulation of leaf stomatal development and pattering (OsEPF1) also influences the development of root aerenchyma tissue when over-expressed.
EPF1 is a well characterised gene involved in regulation of stomatal patterning. Rice plants that had elevated levels of OsEPF1 showed effects on stomatal density, stomatal size, stomatal conductance, leaf water use efficiency and drought tolerance. However, we also showed O2-independent aerenchyma formation in the root tips which is normally induced by growth in oxygen-deficient or waterlogged conditions. Although the mechanism is currently unknown, these data have important implications for mechanisms of the transport of oxygen from shoot to root and in the signalling of oxygen deficiency in root tissue.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant numbers BB/R004633/1, BB/N021061/1, BB/N013646/1]. JAA and DMW receive funding from the University of Nottingham Future Food Beacon of Excellence. We thank Dr Amanda Rasmussen (University of Nottingham) for assistance with the oxygen sensor.
Author Contributions
U.M. performed the rice transformation, most of the experimental work and co-designed all the experiments, R.S.C., E.L.H., J.A.A. and D.W. performed experimental work, C.C.C. performed the cloning and provided the constructs, J.E.G. supervised the cloning and original characterisation of the genes, R.S. supervised the transformation and molecular analysis, E.H.M. supervised all of the physiological work. The manuscript was written by U.M., E.H.M., R.S. and J.E.G. with contributions from R.S.C., J.A.A., D.W. and C.C.C. Figures were prepared by U.M. and R.S.C.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
10/10/2019
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-41922-7.
References
- 1.Jones RJ, Mansfield TA. Suppression of Stomatal Opening in Leaves Treated with Abscisic Acid. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1970;21:714–719. doi: 10.1093/jxb/21.3.714. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holbrook NM, Shashidhar V, James RA, Munns R. Stomatal control in tomato with ABA‐deficient roots: response of grafted plants to soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2002;53:1503–1514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tombesi S, et al. Stomatal closure is induced by hydraulic signals and maintained by ABA in drought-stressed grapevine. Scientific reports. 2015;5:12449. doi: 10.1038/srep12449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Caine Robert S., Yin Xiaojia, Sloan Jennifer, Harrison Emily L., Mohammed Umar, Fulton Timothy, Biswal Akshaya K., Dionora Jacqueline, Chater Caspar C., Coe Robert A., Bandyopadhyay Anindya, Murchie Erik H., Swarup Ranjan, Quick W. Paul, Gray Julie E. Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions. New Phytologist. 2018;221(1):371–384. doi: 10.1111/nph.15344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coupe SA, et al. Systemic signalling of environmental cues in Arabidopsis leaves. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:329–341. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:10343–10347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904209106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sadras VO, Hall AJ, Trapani N, Vilella F. Dynamics of rooting and root-length: leaf-area relationships as affected by plant population in sunflower crops. Field Crops Research. 1989;22:45–57. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(89)90088-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hepworth C, Turner C, Landim MG, Cameron D, Gray JE. Balancing water uptake and loss through the coordinated regulation of stomatal and root development. PloS one. 2016;11:e0156930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhao Z, et al. Hormonal control of the shoot stem-cell niche. Nature. 2010;465:1089. doi: 10.1038/nature09126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurakawa T, et al. Direct control of shoot meristem activity by a cytokinin-activating enzyme. Nature. 2007;445:652. doi: 10.1038/nature05504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang H, Rong H, Pilbeam D. Signalling mechanisms underlying the morphological responses of the root system to nitrogen in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of experimental botany. 2007;58:2329–2338. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bennett T, et al. The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport. Curr Biol. 2006;16:553–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Norman JM, Frederick RL, Sieburth LE. BYPASS1 negatively regulates a root-derived signal that controls plant architecture. Current Biology. 2004;14:1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sachs, J. Text-book of botany, morphological and physical. (Clarendon Press, 1882).
- 15.Jackson M, Armstrong W. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biology. 1999;1:274–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00253.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Joshi R, Kumar P. Lysigenous aerenchyma formation involves non-apoptotic programmed cell death in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2012;18:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12298-011-0093-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.He C-J, Drew MC, Morgan PW. Induction of enzymes associated with lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of Zea mays during hypoxia or nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiology. 1994;105:861–865. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.3.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yamauchi T, Rajhi I, Nakazono M. Lysigenous aerenchyma formation in maize root is confined to cortical cells by regulation of genes related to generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Plant signaling & behavior. 2011;6:759–761. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.5.15417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arikado H. Anatomical and ecological responses of barley and some forage crops to the flooding treatment. Bull. Fac. Agric. Mie Univ. 1955;11:1–29. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schneider HM, et al. Root cortical senescence decreases root respiration, nutrient content and radial water and nutrient transport in barley. Plant, cell & environment. 2017;40:1392–1408. doi: 10.1111/pce.12933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trought M, Drew M. The development of waterlogging damage in young wheat plants in anaerobic solution cultures. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1980;31:1573–1585. doi: 10.1093/jxb/31.6.1573. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Evans DE. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytologist. 2004;161:35–49. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00907.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.He C-J, Morgan PW, Drew MC. Transduction of an ethylene signal is required for cell death and lysis in the root cortex of maize during aerenchyma formation induced by hypoxia. Plant Physiology. 1996;112:463–472. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.2.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abiko T, Obara M. Enhancement of porosity and aerenchyma formation in nitrogen-deficient rice roots. Plant Sci. 2014;215-216:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang X, et al. Drought-induced root aerenchyma formation restricts water uptake in rice seedlings supplied with nitrate. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2012;53:495–504. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lynch, J. P. & Brown, K. M. In The ecophysiology of plant-phosphorus interactions 83–116 (Springer, 2008).
- 27.Armstrong W, Drew M. Root growth and metabolism under oxygen deficiency. Plant roots: the hidden half. 2002;3:729–761. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Colmer TD, Cox MCH, Voesenek LACJ. Root aeration in rice (Oryza sativa): evaluation of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene as possible regulators of root acclimatizations. New Phytologist. 2006;170:767–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01725.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Constable JV, Longstreth DJ. Aerenchyma Carbon Dioxide Can Be Assimilated in Typha Iatifolia L. Leaves. Plant Physiology. 1994;106:1065–1072. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.3.1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nishiuchi S, Yamauchi T, Takahashi H, Kotula L, Nakazono M. Mechanisms for coping with submergence and waterlogging in rice. Rice. 2012;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1939-8433-5-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hunt L, Gray JE. The signaling peptide EPF2 controls asymmetric cell divisions during stomatal development. Current Biology. 2009;19:864–869. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vatén A, Bergmann DC. Mechanisms of stomatal development: an evolutionary view. EvoDevo. 2012;3:11. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-3-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lin, G. et al. A receptor-like protein acts as a specificity switch for the regulation of stomatal development. Genes & development (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Cui H, et al. SPINDLY, ERECTA, and Its Ligand STOMAGEN Have a Role in Redox-Mediated Cortex Proliferation in the Arabidopsis Root. Molecular Plant. 2014;7:1727–1739. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee JS, et al. Competitive binding of antagonistic peptides fine-tunes stomatal patterning. Nature. 2015;522:439. doi: 10.1038/nature14561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Franks PJ, Beerling DJ, Gray JE. Genetic manipulation of stomatal density influences stomatal size, plant growth and tolerance to restricted water supply across a growth carbon dioxide gradient. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367:547–555. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Franks PJW, Doheny‐Adams T, Britton‐Harper ZJ, Gray JE. Increasing water‐use efficiency directly through genetic manipulation of stomatal density. New Phytologist. 2015;207:188–195. doi: 10.1111/nph.13347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hepworth C, Doheny‐Adams T, Hunt L, Cameron DD, Gray JE. Manipulating stomatal density enhances drought tolerance without deleterious effect on nutrient uptake. New Phytologist. 2015;208:336–341. doi: 10.1111/nph.13598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Smedley, M. A. & Harwood, W. A. In Agrobacterium Protocols: Volume 1 (ed. Kan Wang) 3–16 (Springer New York, 2015).
- 40.Toki S, et al. Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. The Plant Journal. 2006;47:969–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hubbart S, Ajigboye OO, Horton P, Murchie EH. The photoprotective protein PsbS exerts control over CO2 assimilation rate in fluctuating light in rice. The Plant Journal. 2012;71:402–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04995.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hubbart S, Bird S, Lake JA, Murchie EH. Does growth under elevated CO2 moderate photoacclimation in rice? Physiologia plantarum. 2013;148:297–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.González, L. & González-Vilar, M. In Handbook of plant ecophysiology techniques 207–212 (Springer, 2001).
- 44.Atkinson JA, Wells DM. An updated protocol for high throughput plant tissue sectioning. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1721. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burton AL, Williams M, Lynch JP, Brown KM. RootScan: Software for high-throughput analysis of root anatomical traits. Plant and Soil. 2012;357:189–203. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1138-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Himmelbauer ML. Estimating length, average diameter and surface area of roots using two different image analyses systems. Plant and soil. 2004;260:111–120. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030171.28821.55. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Luna E, et al. Plant perception of beta-aminobutyric acid is mediated by an aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. Nature Chemical Biology. 2014;10:450–456. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wells DM, et al. Recovering the dynamics of root growth and development using novel image acquisition and analysis methods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367:1517–1524. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ma Z, Baskin TI, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Regulation of root elongation under phosphorus stress involves changes in ethylene responsiveness. Plant Physiology. 2003;131:1381–1390. doi: 10.1104/pp.012161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hughes J, et al. Reducing Stomatal Density in Barley Improves Drought Tolerance without Impacting on Yield. Plant Physiology. 2017;174:776–787. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang C, et al. Pd EPF 1 regulates water‐use efficiency and drought tolerance by modulating stomatal density in poplar. Plant biotechnology journal. 2016;14:849–860. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yin X, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cpf1 mediated targeting of a stomatal developmental gene EPFL9 in rice. Plant cell reports. 2017;36:745–757. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2118-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lu J, et al. Homologous genes of epidermal patterning factor regulate stomatal development in rice. Journal of plant physiology. 2019;234-235:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bernacchi C, Singsaas E, Pimentel C, Portis A, Jr, Long S. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell &. Environment. 2001;24:253–259. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Colmer T. Aerenchyma and an inducible barrier to radial oxygen loss facilitate root aeration in upland, paddy and deep‐water rice (Oryza sativa L.) Annals of Botany. 2002;91:301–309. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Niones JM, Suralta RR, Inukai Y, Yamauchi A. Roles of root aerenchyma development and its associated QTL in dry matter production under transient moisture stress in rice. Plant Production Science. 2013;16:205–216. doi: 10.1626/pps.16.205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shiono K, et al. Contrasting dynamics of radial O2-loss barrier induction and aerenchyma formation in rice roots of two lengths. Annals of Botany. 2011;107:89–99. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhu J, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Root cortical aerenchyma improves the drought tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.) Plant, cell & environment. 2010;33:740–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chimungu JG, et al. Utility of root cortical aerenchyma under water limited conditions in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) Field Crops Research. 2015;171:86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Galindo-Castaneda T, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Reduced root cortical burden improves growth and grain yield under low phosphorus availability in maize. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:1579–1592. doi: 10.1111/pce.13197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Senadheera P, Singh R, Maathuis FJ. Differentially expressed membrane transporters in rice roots may contribute to cultivar dependent salt tolerance. Journal of experimental botany. 2009;60:2553–2563. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yamauchi T, et al. Ethylene and reactive oxygen species are involved in root aerenchyma formation and adaptation of wheat seedlings to oxygen-deficient conditions. Journal of experimental botany. 2013;65:261–273. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tavares E, et al. Roles of auxin and ethylene in aerenchyma formation in sugarcane roots. Plant signaling & behavior. 2018;13:e1422464. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2017.1422464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Le J, et al. Auxin transport and activity regulate stomatal patterning and development. Nature communications. 2014;5:3090. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang J-Y, He S-B, Li L, Yang H-Q. Auxin inhibits stomatal development through MONOPTEROS repression of a mobile peptide gene STOMAGEN in mesophyll. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:E3015–E3023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400542111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tameshige T, et al. A secreted peptide and its receptors shape the auxin response pattern and leaf margin morphogenesis. Current Biology. 2016;26:2478–2485. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hoshikawa, K. c. The growing rice plant. Tokyo.: An anatomical monograph. Nobunkyo (1989).
- 69.Jackson M, Fenning T, Drew M, Saker L. Stimulation of ethylene production and gas-space (aerenchyma) formation in adventitious roots of Zea mays L. by small partial pressures of oxygen. Planta. 1985;165:486–492. doi: 10.1007/BF00398093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wiengweera A, Greenway H, Thomson CJ. The use of agar nutrient solution to simulate lack of convection in waterlogged soils. Annals of Botany. 1997;80:115–123. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yukiyoshi K, Karahara I. Role of ethylene signalling in the formation of constitutive aerenchyma in primary roots of rice. AoB Plants. 2014;6:plu043. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yamauchi T, Abe F, Kawaguchi K, Oyanagi A, Nakazono M. Adventitious roots of wheat seedlings that emerge in oxygen-deficient conditions have increased root diameters with highly developed lysigenous aerenchyma. Plant signaling & behavior. 2014;9:e28506. doi: 10.4161/psb.28506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Takahashi F, et al. A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signalling. Nature. 2018;556:235. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ahmadi N, et al. The roots of future rice harvests. Rice (N Y) 2014;7:29. doi: 10.1186/s12284-014-0029-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.