Abstract
Summary
Few studies have examined knowledge and perceptions of osteoporosis among Caribbean Latino adults. Confusion regarding the term osteoporosis was noted. Doctors were viewed as trusted sources of health information, although descriptions of a paradoxical relationship emerged. This study can be used to inform culturally tailored interventions for osteoporosis prevention.
Purpose
The overall goal of this study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of bone health and osteoporosis among Caribbean Latino adults aged ≥ 50 years.
Methods
This triangulated mixed methods study included completion of a quantitative questionnaire and participation in one of four focus groups to obtain information on (1) general health, (2) knowledge about bone health and osteoporosis, (3) sources of information about bone health, and (4) prevention knowledge and personal responsibility. Quantitative data were analyzed using SAS, and qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive and structural coding by two independent research members.
Results
The majority of participants were female (73%), Dominican (84%), and low income (82% < $20,000) with a mean age of 68.4 (± 8.5) years. Most participants had heard of osteoporosis (90%); however, the majority were not able to accurately describe this chronic condition. Health care providers were viewed as most trusted sources of health information, despite feelings of being rushed during their visits, with limited communication about preventative care. Most participants felt that nutrition and exercise were important for overall health.
Conclusions
Caribbean Hispanic adults in this study reported knowledge of osteoporosis and nutritional factors associated with prevention of this chronic condition. However, qualitatively, there was confusion between osteoporosis and other bone and joint conditions. Culturally specific interventions to promote prevention of osteoporosis are urgently needed for this underserved, high-risk population.
Keywords: Hispanic/Latino, Osteoporosis prevention, Awareness, Aging
Introduction
Osteoporosis is a silent disease that often remains undetected until complicated by fracture. Osteoporosis-related fractures pose significant physical and emotional burden to the individual and considerable financial strain for society [1, 2]. According to the most recent (2013–2014) national estimates, osteoporosis and low bone mass affect more than 55.5% (59 million) of US adults aged 50 years and older [3]. Contrary to the commonly held belief that osteoporosis primarily affects non-Hispanic/Latino white women (non-Hispanic white will be used from here on), there is growing evidence that Hispanic/Latino (Latino will be used from here on) men and women have a similar age-adjusted prevalence of osteoporosis as non-Hispanic white men (Latino, 5.9% vs. non-Hispanic white, 6.0%) and women (Latino, 20.5% vs. non-Hispanic white, 17.0%) [3]. Of further concern, the Latino population is projected to have one of the most rapid increases in the incidence of fracture (2.7-fold) and related annual direct medical costs (from $754 million in 2005 to more than $2 billion by 2025) compared with non-Hispanic white and black populations [1].
Osteoporosis prevention is key, as there is no cure for this chronic condition and pharmacological treatment is associated with increased risks and side effects [4–6]. Thus, strategies aimed at preventing and managing osteoporosis through lifestyle modification are ideal. Few theory-based interventions focusing on dietary and physical activity behavior change for bone health have been designed specifically for Latino adults, particularly those of Caribbean origin, likely because of the underlying belief that this population is not at high risk for osteoporosis. There are likely unique risk factors, as well as cultural factors, in this population that need consideration in developing culturally and linguistically tailored interventions targeting bone health. Few studies have investigated knowledge and beliefs of osteoporosis and/or practice of preventative health behaviors in this population [7–9]; however, the majority of these studies collected data using surveys, and to our knowledge, none were conducted among Caribbean Latino adults living on the US mainland. Given that bone status may vary across the Latino subgroups [10], there is a need to assess knowledge and beliefs of osteoporosis and its risk factors among Caribbean Latinos to target prevention efforts in this community.
The objective of this study was to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of bone health and osteoporosis, and the facilitators and barriers for improving health behaviors for osteoporosis prevention among Caribbean Latino men and women, using quantitative and qualitative data. This information will provide insight and guidance for researchers and other public health professionals in developing tailored bone health interventions and programs for Caribbean Latino adults living on the US mainland.
Methods
This triangulated mixed methods study included quantitative questionnaires and four semi-structured focus groups with 45 Caribbean Hispanic/Latino adults to obtain information on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of osteoporosis, and health behaviors related to bone health. This study was approved by the University of Massachusetts Lowell Institutional Review Board.
Study population
A total of 45 participants were recruited through flyers and inperson recruitment from the Senior Center in Lawrence, MA. Participants were included in the study if they were (1) aged 50 years and older, (2) self-reported being of Caribbean Latino Origin, and (3) did not report serious medical conditions that would prevent them from participating in the focus groups. The Lawrence Senior Center serves 200–400 adults per day (> 5000 per year), providing health and social services and referrals to social and educational programs and volunteer opportunities for the community. Those who were interested (n = 46) in participating provided the bilingual research staff with contact information. Phone calls were made by the trained bilingual interviewer to screen and invite each person to join the study; one individual was not eligible. All 45 eligible participants provided written informed consent and participated in the focus groups.
Qualitative and quantitative data collection
Qualitative and quantitative data were collected on similar topics at the same time from the 45 Caribbean Latino adults, analyzed separately, and then complemented, as this methodology improves validity through triangulation and convergence of multiple and different sources of information [11]. Four separate focus groups were held in a quiet, private room at the Lawrence Senior Center. All participants provided written informed consent at the beginning of each focus group. A trained bilingual interviewer, as well as a bilingual focus group moderator, was available to explain and answer any questions about the consent forms.
The bilingual moderator administered a quantitative questionnaire to participants at the beginning of each focus group. A bilingual interviewer was available to help those who were illiterate to complete the questionnaire. The questionnaire, developed by the research team, obtained information on sociodemographics, health status, and health-related behaviors, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards osteoporosis. The questionnaire was developed based on an earlier study examining knowledge, beliefs, and risk factors for osteoporosis in Hispanic women [7]. It included a total of 28 questions, organized into four domains: (1) general health; (2) knowledge about bones, bone health, and osteoporosis, (3) sources of information about bone health, and (4) prevention knowledge and personal responsibility (Appendix).
The moderator facilitated each focus group using a moderator’s guide to address the four domains described above (Appendix). The moderator’s guide was developed by the research team with expertise in bone, nutrition, and policy and health communication and was reviewed for cultural appropriateness and content accuracy. Each focus group was approximately 90 min in length. Focus groups were audio-recorded, and the trained interviewer took notes during each session. Recordings were transcribed verbatim in the original language by a research assistant. Data were analyzed in Spanish to capture any subtle nuances or cultural concepts discussed.
Mixed method analysis
Qualitative analysis
In the first phase of the analysis, all transcripts were first read and reviewed by two independent research team members (SA and NM) to identify initial concepts and themes [12]. In the second phase, using descriptive and structural coding [13], SA and NM independently organized the data, whereby participants’ responses and text segments were placed into pre-selected nodes based on the four domains of the structured questionnaire.
During the coding process, several themes emerged. For example, participants were aware that osteoporosis is a disease that affects bone health, but participants had limited knowledge of bone health. Additional themes that emerged were added to existing themes. These included knowledge of osteoporosis is influenced by personal experience and participants obtained bone health information from various sources (e.g., library, doctor’s office, and television). Once concepts and themes were identified and finalized, SA and NM discussed finalized themes to confirm that all a priori and emergent themes were captured by both. Microsoft Office Excel (2013) was used to organize the data analyzed via descriptive and structural coding [13].
Quantitative data from the questionnaires were analyzed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic variables and frequencies for health variables.
Mixed methods analysis
Quantitative results were compared with the themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis to examine consistencies and/or discrepancies and broaden the understanding of the results.
Results
The sample consisted of 45 participants, primarily female (73%) with a mean age of 68.4 (± 8.5) years (Table 1). The majority were low income (51% < $10,000 and 82% < $20,000 per year) and were born in the Dominican Republic (84%); 49% were retired, while 22% were currently working. A total of 20% (n = 9) reported being told by a doctor that they had osteoporosis, 22% (n = 10) thin or weak bones, and 26.7% (n = 12) issues with vertebral column (Table 1).
Table 1.
Sociodemographic and health characteristics, N = 45
| N (%) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.4 ± 8.5 |
| Female | 33 (73) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 16 (36) |
| Single | 9 (20) |
| Divorced/separated | 14 (31) |
| Widowed | 6 (13) |
| Income | |
| < $10,000 | 23 (51) |
| $10,000–$19,999 | 14 (31) |
| $20,000–$29,999 | 2 (4) |
| ≥ $30,000 | 3 (7) |
| No answer | 3 (7) |
| Education | |
| < 5th grade | 10 (22) |
| 5th to 8th grade | 11 (24) |
| 9–12th grade or GED | 7 (16) |
| Some college/bachelor’s degree | 8 (18) |
| No response | 9 (20)s |
| Place of birth | |
| Puerto Rico | 7 (16) |
| Dominican Republic | 38 (84) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29 |
| Self-reported diabetes | 14 (31) |
| Self-reported arthritis | 21 (47) |
| Self-reported heart disease | 8 (18) |
| Self-reported osteoporosis | 10 (22) |
Not all frequencies add to 45 due to missing data
Quantitative results
General knowledge about bones, bone health, and osteoporosis
The majority of participants had heard or read about osteoporosis (90%) or knew someone with osteoporosis (53%) (Table 2). Most (94%) also considered osteoporosis to be a serious disease, and more than two thirds agreed (22%) or strongly agreed (49%) that osteoporosis is as serious as diabetes, heart disease, or cancer.
Table 2.
Knowledge and beliefs of osteoporosis, N=45
| N (%) | |
|---|---|
| Has heard or read about osteoporosis | 40 (90) |
| Knows someone with osteoporosis | 24 (53) |
| Sources of information about osteoporosis | |
| TV or radio | 22 (49) |
| Internet | 26 (58) |
| Doctor | 18 (40) |
| Newspaper or magazine | 22 (49) |
| Health fair | 23 (51) |
| Friends, family, or neighbors | 15 (33) |
| Views osteoporosis as serious as diabetes, heart disease, or cancer | |
| Not at all | 4 (9) |
| Slightly agree | 5 (11) |
| Agree | 10 (22) |
| Strongly agree | 22 (49) |
| Seriousness of osteoporosis | |
| Not at all | ile you are introducing the focus grou 1 (2) |
| Some | 7 (16) |
| A lot | 35 (78) |
| Concerns about getting osteoporosis | |
| Not at all | 1 (2) |
| Some | 8 (18) |
| A lot | 34 (76) |
| Likelihood of getting osteoporosis | |
| Not at all | 8 (18) |
| Some | 18 (40) |
| A lot | 11 (24) |
| Perceives dietary factors affect bones | |
| Not at all | 10 (22) |
| Some | 11 (24) |
| A lot | 19 (42) |
| Exercise affects bones | |
| Not at all | 21 (47) |
| Some | 6 (13) |
| A lot | 14 (31) |
| How responsible are you for your bone health? | |
| Not at all | 2 (4) |
| Some | 4 (9) |
| A lot | 37 (82) |
| How much does your family history affect your bones? | |
| Not at all | 10 (22) |
| Some | 16 (36) |
| A lot | 18 (40) |
Not all frequencies add to 45 due to missing data
Sources of information about bone health and osteoporosis
Major sources of information about osteoporosis included health fairs (51%) and the internet (58%); other sources included TV or radio (49%), newspaper or magazine (49%), their doctor (40%), and family, friends, or neighbors (33%) (Table 2).
Prevention knowledge and personal responsibility
While 94% of participants were concerned about getting osteoporosis, 64% perceived a possibility of getting it. Diet (66%) and, to a lesser extent, exercise (44%) were perceived as risk factors for osteoporosis, and while 76% considered that family history was a risk factor, 91% assigned personal responsibility for their bone health (Table 2).
Participants were asked to report the frequency of consumption of nine foods/food groups that were primarily rich in calcium and vitamin D, such as milk, yogurt, nuts, fish, and green leafy vegetables. Overall, participants reported consumption of milk, cheese, and beans/legumes almost daily; broccoli and other green leafy vegetables almost once a week; and yogurt, nuts, and fish almost once a month (Fig. 1). A total of 57.7% (n = 26) of participants reported taking a calcium and/or vitamin D supplement.
Fig. 1.
Mean (standard deviation) of eating habits, intake frequency, range 0–4 ([0] never; [1] < 1month; [2] one time per month; [3] at least 1 week; [4] daily)
Qualitative results from focus groups
Information about bone health and osteoporosis
As noted above, most participants had heard of osteoporosis; however, when asked to describe osteoporosis many described painful bones with deformities, particularly of the hands and fingers. One participant expressed the following:
“Los dedos de ella se le deformaron, y entonces dijeron (los doctores) que era una osteoporosis que deformaba. Y ella no podía caminar, ni podía hacer nada, porque ella se deformó completamente.”
“Her fingers were deformed, and then [the doctors] said it was an osteoporosis that deformed. And she could not walk, nor could do anything, because she was completely deformed.”
Information on bone health and osteoporosis gathered from various sources
Participants mentioned specific daytime television shows (Despierta America), workshops at senior centers, and their primary care physicians as sources of information about bone health and osteoporosis. Some participants reported being auto-didactic and finding out information in books, going to the library, and conducting searches on the internet. Others reported having heard about osteoporosis in their native countries, mainly those from the Dominican Republic. Medicaid fact sheets mailed to their homes were also cited as accessible sources of health and osteoporosis information.
Paradoxical doctor-patient relationship
Medical doctors were viewed as the most reliable and trustworthy source of health information; however, most participants reported that their doctors had not talked with them about osteoporosis. Participants who reported their doctor as their main source of information for osteoporosis were those who reported being diagnosed with the disease.
As participants spoke about confidence in their doctors as the most trusted sources of health information, unexpectedly, descriptions of a paradoxical relationship with doctors emerged. Although, they trusted their doctor’s knowledge and competence, most participants felt rushed during visits and did not received detailed information about current medical conditions and/or suggestions of ways for maintaining good health. Some participants expressed the following:
“Mi médico solamente me dice: ¨Eso es para ayudarte del dolor¨, pero no me dice el por qué.”
“My doctor only tells me: That’s to help you with the pain, but he does not tell me why.”
And …
“..Que casi el médico no informa, el médico tú vas, te examina, te da una receta y ya; como que el médico de aquí escudriña muy poco.”
“The doctor doesn’t inform. You go, doctor checks you up, gives you a prescription and that’s it; it’s like the doctors here [U.S.] scrutinize very little.”
Lack of language concordance was one factor mentioned as a major barrier to speaking freely with their doctors. In addition to language, ethnic concordance was expressed as a factor influencing the quality of the doctor-patient interactions. Some participants reported warmer and more personal interactions with Latino doctors who communicated with them in their native language (Spanish) vs. doctors who communicated in English. For example:
“cuando uno le hace una pregunta la explicación no es explicita. Por eso es que a mí me gusta buscar un médico que hable mi idioma.”
“When one asks a question the explanation is not explicit. That’s why I like to search for doctors who speak my language.”
And…
“Mi médico no me ha orientado. No sé si es porque el habla otro idioma y yo hablo otro…”
“My doctor has not made me aware [of osteoporosis]. I do not know if it’s because he speaks one language and I speak another.”
Messages associated with childhood memories of being told to drink milk
Most participants noted recommendations by family members and other authoritative figures during childhood to drink milk for good health and strong bones. Perceptions regarding parent’s low education level were reported as a primary reason for lack of knowledge among parents about osteoporosis; however, participants expressed that their parents were knowledgeable about the connection between dietary behaviors and health. Most participants recalled their mothers and/or grandmothers stressing the importance for children to drink milk for good bone health, especially for bone health later in adulthood.
Prevention knowledge
Awareness of nutrition, exercise, and osteoporosis
While reported awareness of bone health and the etiology of osteoporosis was limited, it was evident that participants were aware of the importance of nutrition and exercise for overall health. Healthy diets, exercise, and weight control were reported as preventive factors for osteoporosis. The consumption of dairy products and foods high in calcium and vitamin D were mentioned as important nutrients for bone health. When prompted about specific foods that could aid in the prevention of osteoporosis (i.e., reducing risk of osteoporosis), participants mentioned fish, particularly salmon and sardines, milk, and milk products, such as cheese and yogurt. Vegetables, fruit, and nuts, or “semillitas,” were also mentioned by some participants. Participants placed emphasis on fresh food and the need to avoid junk food and excess red meat. They focused on the importance of dietary habits in early childhood and how that could affect bone health later in adulthood. Participants expressed the following:
“Yo sé que la osteoporosis, o la enfermedad del sistema óseo viene también con la alimentación. Yo no puedo tomar nada lácteo y siempre mi mamá me decía que yo iba a tener quizá problemas con los huesos, porque como era alérgica a la leche y yo sé que la leche contiene mucho calcio. Entonces, ya yo, mentalmente desde pequeña venía sabiendo de que algún día iba a tener problema con los huesos, pero, como ella me está mencionando, tengo a veces muchos dolores en, en, en mis huesos, quizá también es por eso.”
“I know that osteoporosis, or bone system disease is related to your diet. [Since I was a child,] I could not take any type of dairy and my mom would always tell me that I will probably have bone problems...I know that milk contains a lot of calcium. That’s why since childhood I knew that one day I would have problems with my bones”.
“Bueno puede venir de que hay niños que cuando están chiquitos no toman leche… por el calcio. Los niños cuando no toman leche pequeños, pues casi siempre están enfermos, con algún problema y yo digo que será por eso.”
“Well, you can get [osteoporosis] because as children … some do not drink milk and do not get calcium. When children do not take milk, they get sick all the time and have health problems, and I would say that may be the reason [of getting osteoporosis].”
And…
“Porque mi mamá [que tiene osteoporosis] yo sé que ella casi nunca le gustaba comer cosas que le dan calcio, nunca.”
“My mother [who has osteoporosis], I know that she almost never liked to eat food rich in calcium, almost never.”
And…
“uno en su juventud se alimenta mal y cuando uno ya está cayendo en la edad, pues entonces todo eso, esos problemas se reflejan.”
“(While young) if we continue eating junk food and stuff like that and do not take caution with the types of food we eat, we are exposed to suffer from osteoporosis.”
Poor dietary habits (e.g., eating junk foods, foods high in fat and salt) were associated with poor bone health, whereas the consumption of fresh and natural foods was positively associated with bone health. As one participant explained:
“Si seguimos comiendo comida chatarra y esas cosas así y no tomamos precaución en nuestra comida que debemos de comer, estamos expuestos a sufrir de osteoporosis.”
“If we keep eating junk food and things like that and we do not take precaution in eating the food that we should eat, we are exposed to suffer from osteoporosis.”
And…
“Para mí la osteoporosis da cuando uno se descuida, no se alimenta, no toma leche, no toma calcio, no come vegetales; como ella dijo, falta de fruta, frutas naturales de las que sembramos en nuestro patio.”
“To me, osteoporosis occurs when one does not take care of oneself, and does not eat well, drink milk, take calcium, eat vegetables; … lack of fruit [in the diet], natural fruit, the kind you cultivate in your own
backyard.”
While participants overall expressed the importance of physical activity and exercise for good health, only a small proportion described a positive link between physical activity and bone health. Some viewed the lack of physical activity, common in their communities, as a risk factor for osteoporosis. One participant particularly expressed:
“También una persona que sea ociosa, que no haga ejercicio, puede obtener la osteoporosis”
“Also a person who is lazy, who does not exercise, can get osteoporosis”
Misinformation related to osteoporosis prevention
As participants spoke about the relationships between nutrition, physical activity, and osteoporosis, inconsistencies and misinformation regarding osteoporosis prevention emerged. Most participants reported basic knowledge regarding food sources of calcium and vitamin D. Some participants referred to vitamin D as the “sun” vitamin and mentioned the need to take supplements due to lack of direct sunlight in the northeast. However, most were not very clear about dietary sources of vitamin D.
In contrast, participants were familiar with calcium sources. Milk and other dairy products were the most common sources of calcium mentioned. Green vegetables, nuts, and fish were also listed as sources of calcium. Orange juice was frequently cited as a good source of calcium; however, most participants did not seem to be aware that calcium is added to orange juice through fortification.
Most participants agreed that “el ejercicio es muy bueno para los huesos” (“exercise is very good for the bones”). However, they could not provide a concrete reason, nor describe the mechanism as to why or how physical activity is beneficial for bone health. Walking and Zumba classes were reported as preferred ways of engaging in physical activity.
Personal responsibility
Individuals have a personal responsibility for one’s health
The majority of participants expressed that personal responsibility was one of the most important factors for an individual’s current health status. Participants described this responsibility as educating oneself and seeking information (especially after the diagnosis of a disease), prioritizing asking questions at the doctor’s office, and following through with recommendations provided by doctors. Participants also expressed that self-motivation and dedication are important. Participants stated that an individual’s “voluntad” (will), “interes” (interest), and “autoestima” (self-esteem) could influence one’s self-motivation and dedication to engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors.
Barriers to a healthy lifestyle
While participants agreed that personal responsibility is a major factor in one’s own health status, they recognized contextual factors that can inhibit or support an individual’s ability to prioritize their health. Lack of control or motivation to follow a healthy diet and engage in frequent physical activity were viewed primarily as individual failures. However, when prompted about barriers that would inhibit individuals to engage in healthy lifestyle behaviors, contextual factors, such as the high price of good quality, healthy foods (e.g., fresh fruit and vegetables), and lack of information and knowledge (e.g., low education level, limited awareness of disease), were viewed as major barriers. For example:
“La gente fracasa por falta de conocimiento.”
“People fail for lack of knowledge.”
And…
“Y a veces uno puede ser responsable, pero también la falta de información que uno no tiene quizá a uno lo hace irresponsable también.”
“Sometimes one can be responsible, however lack of information can cause someone to be irresponsible.”
Participants also mentioned lack of “open-mindedness” to trying different foods or changing dietary behaviors, such as eating more green leafy vegetables and reducing portion sizes of rice, plantains, white bread, and other starches. Lack of planning ahead and scheduling time to cook healthy meals at home, along with finding time during the day to engage in physical activity, were also mentioned as barriers. Interestingly, some participants mentioned the high prevalence of a “sweet tooth” among Latinos, and a low tolerance for drinks and desserts with lower or no sugar content, as a major barrier to reducing intake of foods and drinks that are higher in sugar.
Use of vitamins, minerals, and other herbal or natural supplements
Most of the participants who consumed supplements consumed these products based on their doctor’s recommendations. The most commonly consumed vitamin and/or mineral supplements included calcium and vitamins C, D, and E. Those who did not consume supplements expressed that there was no need when following a healthy diet. Some described advice given to them from their doctors in their native country, whereby it was recommended to consume a diet rich in a variety of healthy foods, instead of consuming supplemental forms of vitamins and minerals. Regarding the use and consumption of other herbal/natural supplements, some mentioned consuming fruit and/or vegetable homemade drinks, both hot and cold, to promote good health. Others mentioned consuming homemade remedies to alleviate colds or other medical symptoms.
Discussion
This mixed methods study explored in-depth the perceptions and experiences regarding bone health and osteoporosis among older Latino adults. While participants reported high knowledge of osteoporosis, as assessed by a quantitative questionnaire, when asked qualitatively, participants often confused osteoporosis with other bone and join conditions, suggesting limited knowledge of this chronic health condition. Further, our findings indicate the need for doctors and other health care providers, who are viewed as the most trusted sources of health information in this population, to offer clear and culturally tailored prevention information about bone health. This is particularly important, as the majority of participants reported obtaining information about bone health after being diagnosed with osteoporosis.
There is a need to increase awareness and knowledge of osteoporosis, particularly among Caribbean Latino adults, as this population presents with a higher or similar prevalence of osteoporosis as compared with non-Hispanic whites [14]. In the current study, most participants had heard of osteoporosis and the majority agreed or strongly agreed that osteoporosis is a serious disease. This is in contrast to an earlier study that found that Latino women were more concerned with developing heart disease, diabetes, and cancer than osteoporosis [7]. A high level of confusion regarding the severity, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis among individuals has been reported in different populations [15], with some studies reporting limited knowledge of osteoporosis and/or confusion regarding risk and prevention [16, 17] and others documenting significant concerns with developing osteoporosis [18]. More importantly, most of the participants reported having knowledge of osteoporosis when assessed through questionnaire, but, qualitatively, many participants did not accurately describe osteoporosis. This suggests familiarity with the term “osteoporosis,” but confusion regarding pathophysiology of this chronic condition. In one of the few previous studies among Hispanics, Geller and Derman [7] found that 70% of Hispanic and African American women knew what osteoporosis was based on a quantitative multiple choice question. However, as in two other studies in Hispanic adults, knowledge and attitudes about osteoporosis were not assessed qualitatively. Studies of other groups of older adults have also reported confusion when describing osteoporosis, with many describing manifestations of arthritis, consistent with our findings [19]. This is plausible, as it is estimated that over 3.1 million Latino adults have arthritis, with Puerto Rican and Dominican adults experiencing the highest prevalence across the Latino subgroups [20]. Irrespective of the differences in prevalence among Latino subgroups, measures of arthritis-attributable effect indicate that this condition significantly impacts the lives of all Latino adults [20], which may explain the confusion with osteoporosis, an asymptomatic condition.
Similar to our findings, others have reported that Latino adults view their health care providers as experts of medical information [21]. While most participants trusted health care providers, they expressed feelings of being rushed during visits and receiving inadequate information on current medical conditions or on preventative care. Participants in the current study reported a low active role in their patient-physician interactions, consistent with other studies of Latino patients [22, 23]. Factors related to a low active patient role may be related to participant’s low acculturation level, lack of familiarity with the US health care system, speaking Spanish only, and/or being foreign born [22, 23]. Patient activation interventions, by which patients develop specific skills on question formulation and collection of health-related information, may be an effective mechanism to increase patient activation and reduce health disparities in health care services access and quality among Latinos [22]. In addition, interventions aimed at clinicians and staff around building rapport that focus on qualities such as compassion, caring, kindness, and cultural sensitivity, has been shown to be important among Latino patients for increasing patient-physician communication [24].
An additional complication to providing education on osteoporosis includes an observed tendency for Latino adults to rely primarily on same day appointments rather than planned preventative visits and to receive care to address symptomatic problems rather than for prevention of chronic conditions [25]. Strategies for helping patients keep scheduled appointments may be needed, as Latino adults have been shown to be at high risk of missing planned primary care appointments [25]. Because of the trust in physicians and health care providers, primary care may be a targeted location for bone health interventions in this population, a model recommended by the US Preventative Services Task Force for the prevention of cardiovascular disease [26]. Fostering positive and culturally sensitive patient-provider relationships may also improve appointment keeping among this population [27].
Diet and exercise are important modifiable risk factors for bone health and were viewed as important for overall heath by the majority of participants in the current study. Dietary calcium and vitamin D were mentioned as the primary nutrients important for bone health, which is not surprising given that much of the research on diet and bone has focused on these nutrients [28–30], although other nutrients and foods have also been shown to be important for bone health [31–35]. Many factors, such as cultural beliefs and traditions, acculturation, food availability, and socioeconomic status, influence dietary intake [36, 37]. Recent data from the Hispanic community Health Study/Study of Latinos shows variation in dietary intake across Latino subgroups, with the lowest intake of folate, iron, and calcium for Dominicans and lowest intakes of vitamin C and fiber for Puerto Ricans, compared to the other groups [37]. This population typically consumes diets rich in starchy root vegetables and fried meats and low in fruit and vegetables, which likely contributes to low intakes of vitamins and minerals important for bone [37, 38]. Data from the National Health Interview Survey showed that fewer Latino adults met CDC recommendations for physical activity compared with non-Hispanic whites [39]. These results suggest that although poor dietary quality and sedentary behavior may have significant adverse effects on bone health, knowledge that this negatively impacts bone is not sufficient for changing behavior. To our knowledge, the formulation and use of theory-based, culturally tailored materials and interventions aimed to reduce risk of osteoporosis have not yet been done in this population.
The quantitative results reflected the content of the four themes identified in the qualitative analysis. Mainly, high levels of awareness about osteoporosis and perceptions that arise from personal experiences with the disease. Results from the focus groups expanded and added specific information about participant’s knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to osteoporosis’ causes and prevention. While most of the participants knew about osteoporosis, focus group results revealed inconsistencies and confusion about the nature of the disease that conflicted with their preventive strategies. In addition, the qualitative data expanded knowledge about perceptions of interactions with doctors, which they highly valued but did not consider offered timely and sufficient preventive information about osteoporosis.
Our study has several limitations that should be considered. This study included only individuals who self-identified as Puerto Rican or Dominican, and therefore, generalizability to other Latino subgroups may be limited. Demographics of our sample were similar to those of all participants at the Senior Center (69% female, 81.1% Hispanic, 32% aged 60–70 years). Questions on dietary intake were limited to frequency of consumption of nine foods and/or food groups due to time constraints. This does not provide a comprehensive assessment of overall dietary quality; however, future research is needed to examine the relationship between dietary quality and bone health in this population. Lastly, the majority of participants were female, consistent with other studies of Caribbean Latino older adults [40].
In conclusion, this study identified several important themes with respect to bone health in this underserved and underrepresented population. There were discrepancies between self-reported knowledge of osteoporosis and nutrition-related factors assessed through quantitative and qualitative methods. These suggested poor understanding of what osteoporosis is and a need for education and prevention initiatives in this population. There were unique perspectives about osteoporosis that can be incorporated into current health care practices and culturally tailored interventions to promote bone health for this population. Careful consideration of the views of doctors and use of health care services are needed to develop future relevant interventions.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Angeline Garcia from the Lawrence Senior Center for her dedication to this research study.
Funding information This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health K01 AR067894.
Appendix.
Quantitative questionnaire and focus group moderator guide





Focus group moderator guide: knowledge of bone health in Hispanic older adults
-
1
Facilitator’s welcome (1–2 min)
Introduce yourself and the note taker and send the Sign-In Sheet with a few quick demographic questions around to the group while you are introducing the focus group.
“Welcome and thank you for volunteering to take part in this focus group. You have been asked to participate as
your point of view is important. I realize you are busy and I appreciate your time.
My name is ________ and I am the moderator today.”
-
2
Introduction and instruction to participants (1–3 min)
Ask the group if anyone has participated in a focus group before. Explain that focus groups are being used more and more often in health and human services research.
About focus groups.
“The purpose of this focus group discussion is to learn from you about your thoughts, feelings, and what you
have heard/read about your bones and your bone health. We hope to learn things that we can use to improve knowledge and behaviors related to bone health in the Latino community. In this group, we are doing both questionnaires and focus group discussions. The reason for using both of these tools is that we can get more in-depth information from a smaller group of people in focus groups. This allows us to understand the context behind the answers given in the written survey and helps us explore topics in more detail than we can do in a written survey.”
Administer and collect questionnaire (10–15 min)
-
Ground rules and logistics (3–5 min)
Discuss and agree with participants on the following rules.
-
The most important rule is that only one person speaks at a time. There may be a temptation to jump in when someone is talking but please wait until they have finished.
-
There are no wrong answers; we are looking for different points of view. You can speak up whether you agree or disagree. We would like everyone to participate, and I may call on you if I have not heard from you in a while
-
Information provided in the focus group must be kept confidential. What is said in this room stays here. We want everyone to feel comfortable sharing when sensitive issues come up.
-
Stay with the group and please do not have side conversations.
-
We will be tape recording the group. We want to capture everything you have to say. We will not identify anyone by name in our report. You will remain anonymous.
-
Turn off cell phones if possible.
-
Does anyone have any questions? (answers)
Logistics
-
The focus group discussion will take will last about 1 h (60 min.).
-
Feel free to move around.
-
Where is the bathroom? Exit?
-
Help yourself to refreshments.
(Turn on the recorder)
-
12
Warm up (5–10 min)
“Please take the first few minutes to get to know the person seated next to you. I’m going to ask you to introduce him/her to the group. I’d like you to tell us something about that person such as their interests and hobbies.”
-
13Guiding questions
- General knowledge about bones, bone health, and osteoporosis (10–15 min)
- What do you know about bone health?
- What do you know about osteoporosis?
- How do you get osteoporosis?
- How concerned are you about getting osteoporosis?
- What are the chances you will get osteoporosis?
- How serious is osteoporosis? Would you say osteoporosis is as serious as diabetes, heart disease or cancer? Why?
Sources of information about bone health (5–10 min)
Where have you read or heard about osteoporosis?
What has your doctor/provider told you about osteoporosis?
What types of messaging have you seen or heard about osteoporosis—this could be anything, for example a billboard, or a pamphlet from your doctor, or a telenovela?
If I say “Got-milk?” or “Toma Leche,” does that remind you of something?
Where do you get information about health?
What sources of health information do you trust more?
Would you feel comfortable asking your doctor/provider about your bones? Probe: Why/why not?
Prevention knowledge (5–10 min)
How can you prevent osteoporosis?
How much does your diet affect your bones?
What can you eat to help your bones?
What kinds of food have calcium?
What kinds of food have vitamin D?
How does regular exercise affect your bones?
Personal agency (10–15 min)
How personally responsible is a person for getting osteoporosis?
If there is a history of osteoporosis in your family, what kind of things can you do to prevent getting osteoporosis?
How often do you eat calcium-rich foods, like milk, etc.?
If eating more nutritious food helps your bones, what would it take for you to eat more nutritious foods, particularly those rich in calcium and Vitamin D? if not mentioned, probe about taste, convenience, familiarity, safety, freshness (how well the food keeps), nutrition knowledge, price, sweets and other food helps me cope with stress, time to prepare
If exercising more minutes/hours per day helps your bones, what would it take for you to exercise at least 30–45 min a day?
What’s stopping you from [eating more nutritious foods] [exercising more]?
How confident are you that you can [eat more nutritious foods] [exercise more]?
Do you regularly take vitamin and mineral supplements? Why do or do not you?
Do you regularly take herbal or other natural supplement? Why do or do not you?
Use of technology (1–2 min)
Ask for a show of hands as a “yes” response to the following questions. Research assistant will tally counts for each response.
Do you use your mobile phone to text with other people?
Do you use a smart phone to use apps?
Do you use email?
Do you use social media, like Facebook?
Concluding remarks (1–5 min)
Thank you for participating. This has been a very successful discussion
Your opinions will be a valuable asset to the study
We hope you have found the discussion interesting
If there is anything you are unhappy with or wish to complain about, please contact me xxxxxx @ xxx-xx-xxxx
I would like to remind you that any comments shared today will remain anonymous
Before you leave, please hand in your completed personal details questionnaire
Footnotes
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the University of Massachusetts Lowell Institutional Review Board.
Conflicts of interest None.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cauley JA (2013) Public health impact of osteoporosis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68:1243–1251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Looker AC, Sarafrazi Isfahani N, Fan B, Shepherd JA (2017) Trends in osteoporosis and low bone mass in older US adults, 2005–2006 through 2013–2014. Osteoporos Int 28:1979–1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Imaz I, Zegarra P, Gonzalez-Enriquez J, Rubio B, Alcazar R, Amate JM (2010) Poor bisphosphonate adherence for treatment of osteoporosis increases fracture risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 21:1943–1951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J (2004) Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 48:271–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2006) Compliance with drug therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1645–1652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Geller SE, Derman R (2001) Knowledge, beliefs, and risk factors for osteoporosis among African-American and Hispanic women. J Natl Med Assoc 93:13–21 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Larkey LK, Day SH, Houtkooper L, Renger R (2003) Osteoporosis prevention: knowledge and behavior in a southwestern community. J Community Health 28:377–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Orces CH, Casas C, Lee S, Garci-Cavazos R, White W (2003) Determinants of osteoporosis prevention in low-income Mexican-American women. South Med J 96:458–464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Araujo AB, Travison TG, Harris SS, Holick MF, Turner AK, McKinlay JB (2007) Race/ethnic differences in bone mineral density in men. Osteoporos Int 18:943–953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Creswell J, Plano Clark V (2011) Designing and conducting mixed method research: chapter 4 Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 58–88 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Krueger RA, Casey MA (2000) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saldana J (2013) The coding manual for qualitative reseachers In: Sage Publications Ltd, 2nd edn [Google Scholar]
- 14.Noel SE, Mangano KM, Griffith JL, Wright NC, Dawson-Hughes B, Tucker KL (2018) Prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass among Puerto Rican older adults. J Bone Miner Res 33: 396–403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bombak AE, Hanson HM (2016) Qualitative insights from the osteoporosis research: a narrative review of the literature. J Osteoporos 2016:7915041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Baheiraei A, Ritchie JE, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2006) Exploring factors influencing osteoporosis prevention and control: a qualitative study of Iranian men and women in Australia. Maturitas 54:127–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Barkmann R, Gluer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reventlow S, Bang H (2006) Brittle bones: ageing or threat of disease exploring women’s cultural models of osteoporosis. Scand J Public Health 34:320–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Satterfield T, Johnson SM, Slovic P, Neil N, Schein JR (2000) Perceived risks and reported behaviors associated with osteoporosis and its treatment. Women Health 31:21–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable effects among Hispanic adults, by Hispanic subgroup—United States, 2002, 2003, 2006, and (2009) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60:167–171 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zamudio CD, Sanchez G, Altschuler A, Grant RW (2017) Influence of language and culture in the primary care of Spanish-Speaking Latino adults with poorly controlled diabetes: a qualitative study. Ethn Dis 27:379–386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alegria M, Sribney W, Perez D, Laderman M, Keefe K (2009) The role of patient activation on patient-provider communication and quality of care for US and foreign born Latino patients. J Gen Intern Med 24(Suppl 3):534–541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cunningham PJ, Hibbard J, Gibbons CB (2011) Raising low ‘patient activation’ rates among Hispanic immigrants may equal expanded coverage in reducing access disparities. Health Aff (Millwood) 30:1888–1894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Julliard K, Vivar J, Delgado C, Cruz E, Kabak J, Sabers H (2008) What Latina patients don’t tell their doctors: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 6:543–549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parker MM, Moffet HH, Schillinger D, Adler N, Fernandez A, Ciechanowski P, Karter AJ (2012) Ethnic differences in appointment-keeping and implications for the patient-centered medical home—findings from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). Health Serv Res 47:572–593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.LeFevre ML, Force USPST (2014) Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 161:587–593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ciechanowski P, Russo J, Katon W, Simon G, Ludman E, Von Korff M, Young B, Lin E (2006) Where is the patient? The association of psychosocial factors and missed primary care appointments in patients with diabetes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 28:9–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Krall EA, Dallal GE (1997) Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 337:670–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Di Daniele N, Carbonelli MG, Candeloro N, Iacopino L, De Lorenzo A, Andreoli A (2004) Effect of supplementation of calcium and vitamin D on bone mineral density and bone mineral content in peri- and post-menopause women; a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pharmacol Res 50:637–641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tenta R, Moschonis G, Koutsilieris M, Manios Y (2011) Calcium and vitamin D supplementation through fortified dairy products counterbalances seasonal variations of bone metabolism indices: the Postmenopausal Health Study. Eur J Nutr 50:341–349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brandao-Burch A, Utting JC, Orriss IR, Arnett TR (2005) Acidosis inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts in vitro by preventing mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 77:167–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heaney RP (2009) Dairy and bone health. J Am Coll Nutr 28(Suppl 1):82S–90S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.New SA (2003) Intake of fruit and vegetables: implications for bone health. Proc Nutr Soc 62:889–899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peterkofsky B (1991) Ascorbate requirement for hydroxylation and secretion of procollagen: relationship to inhibition of collagen synthesis in scurvy. Am J Clin Nutr 54:1135S–1140S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tucker KL (2009) Osteoporosis prevention and nutrition. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7:111–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lin H, Bermudez OI, Tucker KL (2003) Dietary patterns of Hispanic elders are associated with acculturation and obesity. J Nutr 133:3651–3657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Siega-Riz AM, Sotres-Alvarez D, Ayala GX, Ginsberg M, Himes JH, Liu K, Loria CM, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Rock CL, Rodriguez B, Gellman MD, Van Horn L (2014) Food-group and nutrient-density intakes by Hispanic and Latino backgrounds in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am J Clin Nutr 99:1487–1498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.van Rompay MI, McKeown NM, Castaneda-Sceppa C, Falcon LM, Ordovas JM, Tucker KL (2012) Acculturation and sociocultural influences on dietary intake and health status among Puerto Rican adults in Massachusetts. J Acad Nutr Diet 112:64–74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Neighbors CJ, Marquez DX, Marcus BH (2008) Leisure-time physical activity disparities among Hispanic subgroups in the United States. Am J Public Health 98:1460–1464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tucker KL, Mattei J, Noel SE, Collado BM, Mendez J, Nelson J, Griffith J, Ordovas JM, Falcon LM (2010) The Boston Puerto Rican Health Study, a longitudinal cohort study on health disparities in Puerto Rican adults: challenges and opportunities. BMC Public Health 10:107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

