Skip to main content
Clinical Liver Disease logoLink to Clinical Liver Disease
. 2014 Apr 28;3(4):69–73. doi: 10.1002/cld.308

Primary biliary cirrhosis: Family, genes, and bugs

George F Mells 1,
PMCID: PMC6448703  PMID: 30992889

Watch a video presentation of this article

Watch the interview with the author

Answer questions and earn CME

Population‐based case‐control association studies of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) have identified several risk factors that are associated with the disease. These include a personal history of autoimmunity, a family history of PBC, cigarette smoking, use of hair dye or nail varnish, and a history of urinary tract infections.1

There is strong evidence that PBC is a heritable condition. Some 1.33%‐6.4% of PBC patients have a family history of the disease (Table 1).1‐6 The sibling relative risk (λS) for PBC is estimated to be 10.5, which is similar to that of other complex disorders (Table 2).6 It has been shown in large case‐control association studies that having a first‐degree relative (FDR) with PBC is a strong risk factor for developing the disease, with an odds ratio ∼10.1, 7 In a study of eight monozygotic and eight dizygotic twin pairs, the pairwise monozygotic concordance rate for PBC was 0.63 compared with a dizygotic concordance rate of zero.8 Furthermore, up to 15% of FDRs of PBC probands have antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) with normal liver biochemistry (asymptomatic AMAs), and up to 20% of FDRs of PBC probands have an autoimmune condition other than PBC.9, 10

Table 1.

Proportion of PBC Patients with a Family History of the Disease

Reference Patients with a Family History of PBC Total Patients %
Bach and Schaffner2 26 405 6.40
Brind et al.3 10 736 1.33
Floreani et al.4 6 156 3.80
Tsuji et al.5 8 156 5.10
Jones et al.6 10 157 6.40
Gershwin et al.1 57a 1032 6.00
Corpechot et al.7 8a 221 4.00
a

FDR only.

Table 2.

Heritability of Selected Autoimmune or Immunomediated Disorders, Measured by the Relative Sibling Risk

Disease Relative Sibling Risk
Primary sclerosing cholangitis 9‐39
Crohn disease 5‐35
Type I diabetes mellitus 15
PBC 10
Psoriasis 4‐12
Rheumatoid arthritis 5‐10
Ulcerative colitis 6‐9

The relative sibling risk (or λS) refers to the risk of disease in siblings of disease probands compared with the risk of disease in the general population.

These observations suggest that PBC is a complex disorder, meaning that it is caused by a complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors. In recent years, there have been major efforts to delineate the genetic architecture of PBC. To date, four genome‐wide association studies and two iCHIP studies of PBC have been reported (Table 3). Altogether, these studies have confirmed the well‐established human leukocyte antigen (HLA) association and identified 27 non‐HLA risk loci for the disease (Table 4).11‐17 Of note, many loci associated with PBC are also associated with other autoimmune conditions (e.g., Sjogren syndrome), suggesting that some autoimmune disorders might have a common genetic basis.

Table 3.

Genome‐Wide Association Studies and iCHIP Studies of PBC

Discovery Panel Replication Panel
Reference Description Countries Ethnicity Cases Controls SNP Chip Cases Controls
Hirschfield et al.11 North American GWAS Canada, United States Caucasian 505 1,507 Illumina Human Hap370 BeadChip 526 1,206
Hirschfield et al.12 Extended replication study of the North American GWAS Canada, United States Caucasian Discovery panel from North American GWAS 857 3,198
Liu et al.13 Italian GWAS Italy Caucasian 453 945 Illumina 610K (cases) NA
Illumina 1Mb (controls)
Liu et al.13 GWMA of North American and Italian GWAS discovery panels Italy, Canada Caucasian Discovery panels from North American and Italian GWAS NA
Mells et al.14 WTCCC3 GWAS United Kingdom Caucasian 1,840 5,163 Illumina 660W‐Quad array (cases) 620 2,514
Illumina Human1M‐Duo (controls)
Nakamura et al.15 Japanese GWAS Japan Japanese 487 476 Affymetrix Axiom Genome‐Wide ASI 1 Array 787 615
Countries Ethnicity Cases Controls
Juran et al.16 Canada, Italy, US Caucasian 2,426 5,731
Liu et al.17 UK Caucasian 2,861 8,514

Abbreviations: GWAS, genome‐wide association study; GWMA, groundwater management area; NA, not available; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 4.

Risk Loci and Candidate Genes for PBC

Reference Locus SNP/RA OR P Candidate Gene(s) in Region
Hirschfield et al.12 1p36 rs3748816/C 1.33 3.15 × 10−8 MMEL1
Liu et al.17 1p31.3 rs72678531/G 1.61 2.47 × 10−38 IL12RB2
Liu et al.17 1q31.3 rs2488393/A 1.28 4.29 × 10−12 DENND1B
Liu et al.17 2q32.2 rs3024921/A 1.62 2.59 × 10−18 STAT1, STAT4
Liu et al.17 3p24.3 rs1372072/A 1.20 2.28 × 10−8 PLCL2
Liu et al.17 3q13.3 rs2293370/G 1.39 6.84 × 10−16 TMEM39A, POGLUT1, TIMMDC1, CD80
Liu et al.17 3q25.33 rs2366643/A 1.35 3.92 × 10−22 IL12A
Liu et al.17 4q24 rs7665090/C 1.26 8.48 × 10−14 MANBA, NFKB1
Liu et al.17 5p13 rs6871748/A 1.30 2.26 × 10−13 IL7R, CAPSL, SPEF2, UGT3A1
Liu et al.17 6p21 rs7774434/C 1.57 1.30 × 10−48 HLA region
Liu et al.17 7p14.1 rs6974491/A 1.25 4.44 × 10−8 ELMO1
Liu et al.17 7q32 rs35188261/A 1.52 6.52 × 10−22 IRF5, TNPO3
Nakamura et al.15 9p32 rs4979462/T 1.57 1.85 × 10−14 TNFSF15
Mells et al.14 11q13 rs538147/G 1.23 2.06 × 10−10 RPS6KA4
Liu et al.17 11q23.3 rs80065107/A 1.39 7.20 × 10−16 CXCR5, DDX6
Nakamura et al.15 11q23 rs4938534/A 1.38 3.27 × 10−8 POU2AF1
Liu et al.17 12p13.2 rs1800693/G 1.27 1.18 × 10−14 TNFRSF1A, LTBR, SCNN1A
Liu et al.17 12q24 rs11065979/A 1.20 2.87 × 10−9 ATXN2, BRAP, SH2B3
Juran et al.16 13q14 rs3862738/G 1.33 2.18 × 10−8 TNFSF11
Liu et al.17 14q24 rs911263/T 1.26 9.95 × 10−11 RAD51B
Mells et al.14 14q32 rs8017161/A 1.22 2.61 × 10−13 TNFAIP2
Liu et al.17 16p13.13 rs12708715/G 1.29 2.19 × 10−13 SOCS1, CLEC16A, PRM1, PRM2
Liu et al.17 16q24.1 rs11117433/G 1.26 1.41 × 10−9 IRF8
Liu et al.17 17q12 rs17564829/G 1.26 6.05 × 10−14 ORMDL3, ZPBP2, GSDMB, IKZF3
Liu et al.17 17q21.1 rs17564829/G 1.25 2.15 × 10−9 CRHR1, MAPT
Liu et al.17 19p13.2 rs34536443/G 1.91 1.23 × 10−12 TYK2
Liu et al.13 19q13.3 rs3745516/A 1.46 7.97 × 10−11 SPIB
Liu et al.17 22q13.1 rs2267407/A 1.29 1.29 × 10−13 SYNGR1, PDGFB, RPL3

Risk loci were identified at a genome‐wide level of significance in at least one genome‐wide association study or iCHIP study of PBC. For each locus, the results are from the study with strongest evidence of association.

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; RA, risk allele; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Candidate genes at PBC risk loci function at multiple levels of the immune system. It seems that many candidate genes for PBC contribute to innate immune responses and the biological cascade by which a TH1‐type adaptive immune response is (or is not) established (Fig. 1). For example, SPIB, IRF5, and IRF8 each contribute to the development of dendritic cells.18–20 In antigen‐presenting cells (APCs), signaling by pattern recognition receptors is mediated by NF‐κB and IRF5, and negatively regulated by RPS6KA4, while signaling by TNFRSF1A is mediated by NF‐κB and negatively regulated by DENND1B.21‐24 In macrophages, IRF5 promotes differentiation into inflammatory (M1) macrophages that produce IL‐12 and other pro‐inflammatory cytokines.25 Naive CD4+ TH0 cells are activated when the T cell receptor interacts with epitope presented in the peptide‐binding groove of class II HLA on APCs, accompanied by the interaction of various costimulatory molecules, including CD80 and CD86 on APC with CD28 on T cells.26 Activated TH0 cells are driven to differentiate into TH1 cells by IL‐12 interacting with IL‐12R. Signals from IL‐12R are mediated by TYK2 and STAT4 and regulated negatively by SOCS1.27, 28 It is plausible that variants in these genes might affect this cascade and predispose to immune dysregulation and autoimmunity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Variants associated with PBC might affect the process by which the TH1 immune response is established. Immature dendritic cells (DC) are activated by interaction of pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs, potentially including CLEC16A). Differentiation into inflammatory DCs is promoted by pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor, which cause increased expression of TNF, IL‐6, IL‐12, and IFN‐γ. Signaling by PRRs is mediated by NF‐κB and IRF5, and negatively regulated by RPS6KA4, while signaling by TNFRSF1A is mediated by NF‐κB and negatively regulated by DENND1B. Naïve CD4+ TH0 cells are activated by interaction of the T cell receptor (TCR) with complementary antigen, presented in the peptide binding groove of class II HLA on APCs, with costimulation by CD80 and CD86 on APC interacting with CD28 on T cells. Differentiation of the activated TH0 cell into TH1 cells is driven by IL‐12, which interacts with IL‐12R. Signals from IL‐12R are mediated by TYK2 and STAT4, which are negatively regulated by SOCS1. In turn, TH1 cells produce IFN‐γ and TGF‐β, inducing pro‐inflammatory APCs, promoting IL‐12, and suppressing IL‐4, thereby sustaining the TH1 response. Adapted with permission from Genetics of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. Copyright 2013, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Genetic factors undoubtedly contribute to the etiology of PBC; however, PBC and other complex disorders cannot be explained by genetic factors alone. Environmental factors are also important. In particular, it has been proposed that micro‐organisms (such as Escherichia coli or Novosphingobium aromaticivorans) or xenobiotics (such as synthetic constituents of cosmetics) might be the environmental trigger for PBC.

Molecular mimicry is generally proposed to be the mechanism by which micro‐organisms induce disease in susceptible individuals. By this mechanism, prokaryotic antigens homologous to human pyruvate dehydrogenase complex E2 subunit (PDC‐E2) stimulate an adaptive immune response that cross‐reacts with self–PDC‐E2, initiating the disease process.29 Xenobiotics may trigger disease in a similar fashion. Xenobiotics are metabolically activated to electrophilic intermediates that form covalent adducts with proteins. Autoimmunity may occur if the xenobiotic/self‐protein adduct is immunogenic. Autoimmunity may persist after exposure to the xenobiotic has ceased if the immune response cross‐reacts with the original, unaltered self‐protein.30

In support of this hypothesis, it has been shown that AMAs and T cells against human M2 antigens cross‐react with antigens from E. coli and vice versa.31 Similarly, it has been shown that human AMAs cross‐react with antigens from N. aromaticivorans, while susceptible mice inoculated with N. aromaticivorans have been shown to develop a PBC‐like disease.32 Furthermore, it has been shown that inoculation of guinea pigs or mice with xenobiotics such as 6‐bromohexanoate or 2‐octynoic acid leads to a persistent PBC‐like illness.33

Of note, it has also been proposed that PBC might be caused by direct infection of liver cells by a human β‐retrovirus closely related to mouse mammary tumor virus. However, this theory is controversial.34

The microbiome might also contribute to development of PBC and other autoimmune conditions. The microbiome refers to all of the micro‐organisms that normally inhabit environmentally exposed surfaces (such as the skin, mouth, large bowel, and vagina). It has been shown that the microbiome influences development of the immature immune system as well as immune responses of the mature immune system.35 Significant changes in the composition of the microbiome (“dysbiosis”) might therefore lead to immune dysregulation and predispose to autoimmunity. Indeed, dysbiosis has been linked to type I diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis.36

It is plausible that the genome, microbiome, and molecular mimicry are linked. For example, a high‐risk genome or high‐risk microbiome may render the individual more susceptible to autoimmunity, and the autoimmune process may finally be triggered by exposure to a bacterial or xenobiotic mimetope of PDC‐E2. Exposure to a mimetope may be unnecessary if genetic variants and/or dysbiosis lead to immune dysregulation sufficient to cause spontaneous loss of tolerance to PDC‐E2 and other self‐antigens. The relationship between the genome and microbiome is an exciting subject for research in the near future.

Abbreviations

AMA

antimitochondrial antibody

APC

antigen‐presenting cell

FDR

first‐degree relative

PBC

primary biliary cirrhosis.

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

References

  • 1. Gershwin ME, Selmi C, Worman HJ, Gold EB, Watnik M, Utts J, et al. Risk factors and comorbidities in primary biliary cirrhosis: a controlled interview‐based study of 1032 patients. Hepatology 2005;42:1194‐1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bach N, Schaffner F. Familial primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1994;20:698‐701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Brind AM, Bray GP, Portmann BC, Williams R. Prevalence and pattern of familial disease in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gut 1995;36:615‐617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Floreani A, Naccarato R, Chiaramonte M. Prevalence of familial disease in primary biliary cirrhosis in Italy. J Hepatol 1997;26:737‐738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tsuji K, Watanabe Y, Van De Water J, Nakanishi T, Kajiyama G, Parikh‐Patel A, et al. Familial primary biliary cirrhosis in Hiroshima. J Autoimmun 1999;13:171‐178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jones DE, Watt FE, Metcalf JV, Bassendine MF, James OF. Familial primary biliary cirrhosis reassessed: a geographically‐based population study. J Hepatol 1999;30:402‐407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Corpechot C, Chretien Y, Chazouilleres O, Poupon R. Demographic, lifestyle, medical and familial factors associated with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2010;53:162‐169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Selmi C, Mayo MJ, Bach N, Ishibashi H, Invernizzi P, Gish RG, et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: genetics, epigenetics, and environment. Gastroenterology 2004;127:485‐492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lazaridis KN, Juran BD, Boe GM, Slusser JP, de Andrade M, Homburger HA, et al. Increased prevalence of antimitochondrial antibodies in first‐degree relatives of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;46:785‐792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Watt FE, James OF, Jones DE. Patterns of autoimmunity in primary biliary cirrhosis patients and their families: a population‐based cohort study. QJM 2004;97:397‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hirschfield GM, Liu X, Xu C, Lu Y, Xie G, Lu Y, et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis associated with HLA, IL12A, and IL12RB2 variants. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2544‐2555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hirschfield GM, Liu X, Han Y, Gorlov IP, Lu Y, Xu C, et al. Variants at IRF5‐TNPO3, 17q12‐21 and MMEL1 are associated with primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2010;42:655‐657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Liu X, Invernizzi P, Lu Y, Kosoy R, Lu Y, Bianchi I, et al. Genome‐wide meta‐analyses identify three loci associated with primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2010;42:658‐660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mells GF, Floyd JA, Morley KI, Cordell HJ, Franklin CS, Shin SY, et al. Genome‐wide association study identifies 12 new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2011;43:329‐332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nakamura M, Nishida N, Kawashima M, Aiba Y, Tanaka A, Yasunami M, et al. Genome‐wide association study identifies TNFSF15 and POU2AF1 as susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis in the Japanese population. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:721‐728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Juran BD, Hirschfield GM, Invernizzi P, Atkinson EJ, Li Y, Xie G, et al. Immunochip analyses identify a novel risk locus for primary biliary cirrhosis at 13q14, multiple independent associations at four established risk loci and epistasis between 1p31 and 7q32 risk variants. Hum Mol Genet 2012;21:5209‐5221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Liu JZ, Almarri MA, Gaffney DJ, Mells GF, Jostins L, Cordell HJ, et al. Dense fine‐mapping study identifies new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2012;44:1137‐1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schotte R, Rissoan MC, Bendriss‐Vermare N, Bridon JM, Duhen T, Weijer K, et al. The transcription factor Spi‐B is expressed in plasmacytoid DC precursors and inhibits T‐, B‐, and NK‐cell development. Blood 2003;101:1015‐1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Becker AM, Michael DG, Satpathy AT, Sciammas R, Singh H, Bhattacharya D. IRF‐8 extinguishes neutrophil production and promotes dendritic cell lineage commitment in both myeloid and lymphoid mouse progenitors. Blood 2012;119:2003‐2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tailor P, Tamura T, Ozato K. IRF family proteins and type I interferon induction in dendritic cells. Cell Res 2006;16:134‐140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Honda K, Taniguchi T. IRFs: master regulators of signalling by Toll‐like receptors and cytosolic pattern‐recognition receptors. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:644‐658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kaisho T, Tanaka T. Turning NF‐kappaB and IRFs on and off in DC. Trends Immunol 2008;29:329‐336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Arthur JS. MSK activation and physiological roles. Front Biosci 2008;13:5866‐5879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cabal‐Hierro L, Lazo PS. Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor receptors. Cell Signal 2012;24:1297‐1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Krausgruber T, Blazek K, Smallie T, Alzabin S, Lockstone H, Sahgal N, et al. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1‐TH17 responses. Nat Immunol 2011;12:231‐238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jin B, Sun T, Yu XH, Yang YX, Yeo AE. The effects of TLR activation on T‐cell development and differentiation. Clin Dev Immunol 2012;2012:836485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Watford WT, Hissong BD, Bream JH, Kanno Y, Muul L, O'Shea JJ. Signaling by IL‐12 and IL‐23 and the immunoregulatory roles of STAT4. Immunol Rev 2004;202:139‐156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tamiya T, Kashiwagi I, Takahashi R, Yasukawa H, Yoshimura A. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins and JAK/STAT pathways: regulation of T‐cell inflammation by SOCS1 and SOCS3. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011;31:980‐985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Burroughs AK, Butler P, Sternberg MJ, Baum H. Molecular mimicry in liver disease. Nature 1992;358:377‐378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Powell JJ, Van de Water J, Gershwin ME. Evidence for the role of environmental agents in the initiation or progression of autoimmune conditions. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107(suppl 5):667‐672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tanimoto H, Shimoda S, Nakamura M, Ishibashi H, Kawano A, Kamihira T, et al. Promiscuous T cells selected by Escherichia coli: OGDC‐E2 in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Autoimmun 2003;20:255‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Selmi C, Balkwill DL, Invernizzi P, Ansari AA, Coppel RL, Podda M, et al. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis react against a ubiquitous xenobiotic‐metabolizing bacterium. Hepatology 2003;38:1250‐1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wakabayashi K, Yoshida K, Leung PS, Moritoki Y, Yang GX, Tsuneyama K, et al. Induction of autoimmune cholangitis in non‐obese diabetic (NOD).1101 mice following a chemical xenobiotic immunization. Clin Exp Immunol 2009;155:577‐586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mason AL, Zhang G. Linking human beta retrovirus infection with primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2010;34:359‐366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9:313‐323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Proal AD, Albert PJ, Marshall TG. The human microbiome and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2013;25:234‐240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Liver Disease are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

RESOURCES