Skip to main content
Clinical Liver Disease logoLink to Clinical Liver Disease
. 2014 Dec 9;4(5):113–115. doi: 10.1002/cld.434

Liver Biopsy–Transjugular

Rémy Schwarzer, 1, Arnulf Ferlitsch, 1,
PMCID: PMC6448748  PMID: 30992935

Watch a video presentation of this article

Watch the interview with the author

Answer questions and earn CME

Abbreviations

CPT

complete portal tracts

PLB

percutaneous liver biopsy

TJLB

transjugular liver biopsy.

Introduction

First described by von Frerichs in 1884,1 liver biopsy remains a cornerstone for diagnosing liver disease. Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) was introduced about 80 years later2 and found its way into clinical practice in 1967. In the beginning, Hanafee et al. used liver vein catheterization for biliary tract cholangiography,3 and later they also used it for liver biopsy.4

This transjugular approach was also introduced for kidney biopsy in the 1990s,5 but it has not gained widespread popularity since its introduction nearly 20 years ago.

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for histological diagnosis and assessment of the severity of liver disease.6

The advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of transjugular and percutaneous (ultrasound guided/aimed) liver biopsy (PLB) are shown in Table 1. For the indications and contraindications of TJLB, see Table 2.

Table 1.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Transjugular and Percutaneous (ultrasound guided/aimed) Liver Biopsy

Pros of TJLB Cons of TJLB Pros of PLB Cons of PLB
Feasible in patients with acute liver failure or with congenital clotting disorder7 Available only in large volume center Gold standard for histological diagnosis and assessment of the severity of the liver disease6 Clotting disorders
Can be used in combination with other interventions required in cirrhotic patients (hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement, right heart catheter) Price Widely available, easy method More complications than TJLB10
Fewer overall complication in TJLB (7%‐20%8, 9, 10 versus 38% in PLB10) Less portal fields in a single specimen More than one pass to obtain sufficient tissue might increase complications6
Better tolerability11 and less pain because Glisson capsula is not penetrated10 Use of more analgetic postbiopsy10

Table 2.

Indications and Contraindications for TJLB.

Indication TJLB Contraindication TJLB
Performed when percutaneous approach is contraindicated (coagulopathy, ascites, and morbid obesity 12, 13, 14 No specific contraindication 15 Access to the right jugular internal vein not possible

TJLB: Quality

Specimens taken should be 20‐ to 25‐mm long. The amount of complete portal tracts (CPT) necessary to obtain a diagnosis ranges from 4 (to rule out graft rejection after liver transplantation16) to 11 (viral or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis17). However, even when using percutaneous liver biopsy, these numbers cannot be obtained in a substantial proportion of patients. In a previous study, the proportion of patients in which a specimen with ≥ 10 portal tracts could be obtained by percutaneous liver biopsy using a 17G Menghini needle was only 42%.18

The classic definition of CPT is having the full circumference visible, or at least three‐quarters of the circumference, and three luminal structures. Furthermore, a CPT must include at least one hepatic artery, one portal vein, and one interlobular bile duct.19

Procopet et al. reported in his studies that the liver biopsy (LB) sample length and the number of total portal tracts between PLB and TJLB were similar. This indicated that there should be no difference in the quality of LB between the two techniques10, 20, 21 Currently, two systems are used for transjugular liver biopsy: The specimens taken during TJLB with the Menghini technique are more often smaller, more fragmented compared with PLB.6 This difference in quality is often related to the circumstance that TJLB is frequently performed in patients with cirrhosis. However, as stated in the review by Kalambokis et al., the development of thinner Tru‐Cut needles has improved the quality of liver sample taken by TJLB (longer and less‐fragmented samples) and could result in fewer complications than the Menghini technique because it is easier to control the depth of puncture.8

At the Royal Free Hospital in London, United Kingdom, Cholongitas and Burroughs in 326 consecutive TJLB obtained a mean sample length of 22 ± 7 mm and a CPT number of 8.7 ± 5.0 using Tru‐Cut needles with three passes as standard.22 Unpublished data of TJLB of our patient cohort only show a median of five portal tracts in patients with cirrhosis and nine in patients without cirrhosis compared to six and 14 in PLB within the last year, respectively.

TJLB: Complications

Good biopsy samples can be obtained on TJLB by multiple passes without increasing the risk of complications6 because regularly Glisson's capsule is not penetrated.20 Kalambokis et al. differentiate between minor and major complications, which appears respectively in 6.6% and 0.6% of TJLB.8

Minor complications include abdominal pain, supraventricular arrhythmias, and complications in the neck such as pain, bleeding, and hematoma. Complications such as neck pain, hematoma, and carotid artery puncture are significant decreased when coupled with ultrasound guidance.8

The major complication are further divided in nonliver‐related (arteriovenous fistula formation, pneumothorax, and vena cava perforation) and liver‐related (hepatic hematoma and intraperitoneal hemorrhage as result of capsule perforation).9

In case of bleeding (intrahepatic hemorrhage from bleeding artery, pseudoaneurysma of a hepatic arterial branch, and subcapsular hematoma from an arterioportal fistula), the treatment of choice is angiography with coil embolization of the injured vessel.23

TJLB: Surveillance

In many centers, TJLB is performed in inpatients and outpatients. There are no specific guidelines for postinterventional follow‐up. However patients usually stay overnight for safety (hemoglobin control, x‐ray posttransjugular access) or economical reasons.

TJLB: Sedation

Sedation is not used routinely during TJLB because TJLB is usually performed in combination with hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements, and sedation may influence portal pressure.24, 25 However Steinlauf et al. demonstrated that Midazolam may be used at a dose of 0.02 mg/kg without significantly affecting portal pressure.26

Conclusion

TJLB represents a generally safe alternative to PLB for evaluation of the severity of liver disease in patients ineligible for percutaneous liver biopsy. Tru‐cut techniques may overcome the drawback of less portal tracts of the transjugular route, especially in a cirrhotic cohort.

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

References

  • 1. Von Frerichs FT . Ueber den Diabetes. Berlin, Germany: Hirschwald; 1884. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dotter CT. Catheter biopsy. Experimental technic for transvenous liver biopsy. Radiology 1964;82:312‐314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hanafee W, Weiner M. Transjugular percutaneous cholangiography. Radiology 1967;88:35‐39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weiner M, Hanafee WN. A review of transjugular cholangiography. Radiol Clin North Am 1970;8:53‐68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mal F, Meyrier A, Callard P, et al. Transvenous renal biopsy: a preliminary report on 36 patients [Abstract]. Kidney Int 1990;37:279. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Standish R, Marelli L, Quaglia A, Patch D, Dhillon AP, Burroughs AK. A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125:710‐721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. E Cholongitas, AK Burroughs, AP Dhillon. Liver Biopsy, in Evidence-Based Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Third Edition (McDonald JW, Burroughs AK, Feagan BG, Fennerty MB, eds.), 2010. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781444314403.ch46. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S, Marelli L, Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Transjugular liver biopsy—indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications—a systematic review. J Hepatol 2007;47:284‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Funaki B. Hemorrhage after transjugular liver biopsy requiring embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2009;26:358‐360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Procopet B, Bureau C, Métivier S, Selves J, Robic MA, Christol C, Grigorescu M, Vinel JP, Péron JM. Tolerance of liver biopsy in a tertiary care center: comparison of the percutaneous and the transvenous route in 143 prospectively followed patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;24:1209‐1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology 2009;49:1017‐1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Smith TP, Presson TL, Heneghan MA, Ryan JM. Transjugular biopsy of the liver in pediatric and adult patients using an 18‐gauge automated core biopsy needle: a retrospective review of 410 consecutive procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:167‐172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lynskey GE, Levy EB, Banovac F. Two cases of major hemorrhage secondary to transjugular liver biopsy. Semin Intervent Radiol 2007;24:320‐323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Subar D, Khan A, O'Reilly D. Complications of liver biopsy, liver biopsy. In: Takahashi H, ed., InTech. 2011. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/liverbiopsy/complications‐of‐liver‐biopsy‐2.
  • 15. Behrens G, Ferral H. Transjugular liver biopsy. Semin Intervent Radiol 2012;29:111‐117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lee RG. Diagnostic Liver Pathology. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Colloredo G, Guido M, Sonzogni A, Leandro G. Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. J Hepatol 2003;39:239‐244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Röcken C, Meier H, Klauck S, Wolff S, Malfertheiner P, Roessner A. Large‐needle biopsy versus thin‐needle biopsy in diagnostic pathology of liver diseases. Liver 2001;21:391‐397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Crawford AR, Lin XZ, Crawford JM. The normal adult human liver biopsy: a quantitative reference standard. Hepatology 1998;28:323‐331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cholongitas E, Quaglia A, Samonakis D, Senzolo M, Triantos C, Patch D, Leandro G, Dhillon AP, Burroughs AK. Transjugular liver biopsy: how good is it for accurate histological interpretation? Gut 2006;55:1789‐1794. Epub 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Beckmann MG, Bahr MJ, Hadem J, Bredt M, Wedemeyer H, Schneider AS, Kubicka S, Manns MP, Strassburg CP, Wedemeyer J. Clinical relevance of transjugular liver biopsy in comparison with percutaneous and laparoscopic liver biopsy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2009;2009:947014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cholongitas E, Burroughs AK. Liver: transjugular liver biopsy yields high‐quality samples. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:491‐492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kuo V, Mubarak A. An unusual complication of a transjugular liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 2014;146:620‐873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia‐Pagan JC. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;6:573‐582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology 2004;39:280‐282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Steinlauf AF, Garcia‐Tsao G, Zakko MF, Dickey K, Gupta T, Groszmann RJ. Low‐dose midazolam sedation: an option for patients undergoing serial hepatic venous pressure measurements. Hepatology 1999;29:1070‐1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Liver Disease are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

RESOURCES