Abstract
Plastids perform many essential functions in plant metabolism including photosynthesis, synthesis of metabolites, and stress signaling. The most prominent type in green leaves is the chloroplast which contains thylakoids, plastoglobules, and starch. As these structures are closely linked to the metabolism of chloroplasts, changes during plant growth and development and during environmental stress situations are likely to occur. The aim of this study was to characterize changes in size and ultrastructure of chloroplast on cross-sections of leaves during high light stress, Botrytis infection, and dark induced senescence by quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM).The size of chloroplasts on cross sections of leaves decreased significantly when plants were subject to high light (49%), Botrytis infection (58%), and senescence (71%). The number of chloroplasts on cross sections of the palisade cell layer and spongy parenchyma, respectively, decreased significantly in plants exposed to high light conditions (48% and 29%), infected with Botrytis (48% and 46%), and during senescence (78% and 80%). Thylakoids on cross-sections of chloroplasts decreased significantly in plants exposed to high light (22%), inoculated with Botrytis cinerea (36%), and senescence (51%). This correlated with a massive increase in plastoglobules on cross-sections of chloroplasts of 88%, 2,306% and 19,617%, respectively. Starch contents on cross sections of chloroplasts were completely diminished in all three stress scenarios. These results demonstrate that the decrease in the number and size of chloroplasts is a reliable stress marker in plants during abiotic and biotic stress situations which can be easily detected with a light microscope. Further, lack of starch, the occurrence of large plastoglobules and decrease in thylakoids can also be regarded as reliable stress marker in plants which can be detected by TEM.
Introduction
The plastid is an organelle of great significance for plants. It performs photosynthesis by utilizing carbon dioxide and water to synthesize different chemical components that are converted by the plant into sugars and other biomolecules [1,2]. It acts as storage compartments for glucose in the form of starch [3] and other biomolecules such as lipids, amino and nucleic acids [2]. It is involved in plant metabolism by synthesizing phytohormones and other secondary metabolites [2,4]. It is also involved in sensing and signaling stress to other cell compartments which can then lead to adaptations of growth and development of the plant [4,5,6,7].
Form, size, and ultrastructure of plastids vary greatly between different developmental and physiological states of the plant, the function of the organ, and the tissue [8]. In green leaves for example the most prominent form of the plastid is the chloroplast which contains fine structures such as thylakoids, starch, stroma, and plastoglobules (Fig 1). The stroma of the chloroplast is separated from the cytosol by a double membrane and contains DNA, RNA, and ribosomes. Within the stroma lay thylakoids, which are membranes that enclose the intrathylakoidal space and either appear as single stacks or grana stacks [9,10,11]. They contain pigments, enzymes, and other biomolecules involved in the light reaction during photosynthesis. Depending on the amount of glucose produced by the chloroplast and needed inside the cell, chloroplasts may or may not contain starch grains [3]. They appear as electron translucent round or ellipsoid grains inside the chloroplasts and are not surrounded by a membrane. They usually shrink during chemical fixation and are therefore surrounded by an electron translucent area that appears brighter than the starch grain itself (Fig 1). Plastoglobules are electron opaque round objects inside the plastids and are either connected to the outer membrane of thylakoids or occur separated from thylakoids inside the stroma [12, 13]. They consist of lipids that are similar to those found in thylakoids, they contain enzymes that synthesize lipids in thylakoids, and they contain metabolites which are involved in plastid development. They are involved in metabolite synthesis, repair, and disposal which are essential during plastid development, aging and adaptation to stress [12, 13].
In this study ultrastructural changes of chloroplasts were compared between plants exposed to abiotic stress (high light stress), biotic stress (Botrytis cinerea infection), and plants that went through dark-induced senescence. The exposure of plants to high light leads to the closure of stomata which decreases CO2 levels inside the leaf and subsequently leads to disturbances of photosynthesis and to oxidative stress in illuminated chloroplasts [14, 15, 16, 17]. An accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in mitochondria and chloroplasts has been observed in plants infected with the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea [18]. The oxidative burst leads to the development of necrosis and disintegration of the ultrastructure of infected tissue which restricts the spread of the diseases [18, 19, 20]. Dark induced senescence is characterized by loss of proteins, degeneration of chlorophyll and nucleic acid which goes hand in hand with a controlled breakdown of cell and organelle structures [21, 22]. Considering the above described metabolic changes it is not surprising that the ultrastructure of chloroplasts goes through dramatic changes during abiotic and biotic stress. Such changes include changes in the number and size of plastoglobules during abiotic stress such as drought [23,24,25], excess light conditions [26,27,28], and biotic stress such as infection of plants with pathogens [29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. An increase in the number of plastoglobules has been observed during senescence [21,22,34,35]. A decrease in the size of starch grains in chloroplasts was observed during drought [23,24] whereas an increase and or decrease was found during biotic stress such as infection of plants with viral pathogens [36]. As the above described studies have been performed with different plants species under different environmental conditions with different outcomes it is difficult to precisely evaluate how abiotic and biotic stress conditions affect chloroplast ultrastructure and if such changes can serve as reliable marker for stress.
Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate and quantify changes in the ultrastructure of chloroplasts on cross-sections of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves during senescence, abiotic and biotic stress in order to get a deeper insight into how metabolic alterations observed during these studies affect the ultrastructure of chloroplasts. The study was also aimed to dissect which ultrastructural feature in chloroplast would be affected most by the different stress situations and would therefore be best suited as stress marker.
Materials and methods
Plant material
After stratification for 4 d at 4°C seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh. Ecotype Columbia (Col-0) were grown in a growth camber with 8:16 h, light:dark period at 22:18°C. The relative humidity was 60% and the plants were kept at 100% relative soil water content. Control plants were kept at a light intensity between 120 and 140 μmol m-2 s-1 (lower and upper leaves, respectively). High light stress was induced by treating 6-week-old plants grown in soil with 1,500 μmol m-2 s-1 of light (Plug and Grow, 6400 K, white/blue spectrum; Agriculture Trading AG, Walenstadt, Switzerland) for 2 weeks. Dark induced senescence in 6-week-old plants grown in soil was induced by covering fully developed leaves from the 3rd rosette with aluminum foil for 10 days. Control plants were kept at a light intensity between 120 and 140 μmol m-2 s-1. For Botrytis inoculation leaves of the 3rd rosette of 8 week-old plants were cut off and placed into petri dishes containing filter paper wetted with sterile water. A 50 ml drop of a Botrytis cinerea (strain: Bo510) spore suspension was placed onto the abaxial side of each leaf (approximately 1x105 spores ml-1) for 96 h. Spores were preincubated in 3 g L-1 Gamborg’s B5 medium (in 10 mM KH2PO4 buffer, pH 7) supplemented with 25 mM glucose for 2 h to stimulate germination. Control leaves were treated likewise but without spores in the medium. Petri dishes were sealed and stored at light conditions described above.
Electron microscopy
For transmission electron microscopy small pieces of leaves (about 1mm2) were cut out in 2.5% glutardialdehyde in 0.06M Sørensen phosphate buffer at pH 7.2 on a modeling wax plate. Leaves were then transferred into glass vials and fixed for 90 min in the above-mentioned solution. For ultrastructural analysis samples were then rinsed in 0.06 M Sørensen phosphate buffer (4 times for 15 min each) and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.06 M Sørensen phosphate buffer for 90 min at RT. The samples were then dehydrated in a graded series of increasing concentrations of acetone (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%). Pure acetone was then exchanged for propylene oxide and the specimens were gradually infiltrated with increasing concentrations of Agar 100 epoxy resin (30%, 60%, and 100%) mixed with propylene oxide for a minimum of 3 h per step. Samples were finally embedded in pure, fresh Agar 100 epoxy resin (Agar Scientific Ltd, Stansted, UK) and polymerized at 60°C for 48 h. Ultrathin sections (80 nm) were cut with a Reichert Ultracut S ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria), post-stained with lead citrate (1% dissolved in 0.6 M NaOH) and uranyl-acetate (2% dissolved in aqua bidest) for 15 min. Sections were then observed in a Philips CM10 TEM.
Determination of chloroplast number and their fine structures
Changes in the number of chloroplasts and their ultrastructure were evaluated according to Zechmann et al. [30] by investigating four different leaf samples from treated and control plants. An Olympus AX70 light microscope (Olympus, Life and Material Science Europa GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) with a 40x objective lens (n.a. 1.35) was used to determine the number of sectioned chloroplasts in the palisade cell layer and the spongy parenchyma by counting the chloroplasts per cell on 4 semithin cross-sections (3 μm) for each replicate sample. A minimum of 100 cells per leaf type were examined to calculate the number of sectioned chloroplasts in the cells. Ultrathin sections were investigated with the TEM to determine changes in the ultrastructure of the chloroplasts including the thylakoid-system, starch grains, and plastoglobules. The areas (μm2) of these structures were then measured as digital images using the program Optimas 6.5.1 (BioScan Corp.) by manually tracing the perimeter of thylakoids, plastoglobules, starch grains, and the perimeter of the whole chloroplast. The areas of stroma were determined by subtracting the areas of thylakoids, starch, and plastoglobules from the total area of the chloroplasts. Chloroplast fine structures (stroma, thylakoids, starch, and plastoglobules) were then converted into relative areas (% of total chloroplast area) to allow comparisons between different treatments. A minimum of 20 sectioned chloroplasts from at least 10 different cells from four different samples per treatment were examined. The obtained data were statistically evaluated with SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp. New York, USA) by applying the Mann–Whitney U test.
Results
The number of chloroplasts on cross-sections of the palisade cell layer decreased significantly in plants exposed to high light conditions and infected with Botrytis (both 48%). Seventy eight % less chloroplasts were detected on cross sections of leaves exposed to dark induced senescence. A similar situation was found in the spongy parenchyma where the number of chloroplasts decreased significantly on cross-sections of leaves exposed to high light conditions (29%), infected with Botrytis (46%), and during senescence (80%) (Fig 2, Table 1).
Table 1. Number (#), absolute area (in μm2), and relative area (in %) of chloroplasts and fine structures on cross sections of control plants and plants grown under high light conditions, inoculated with Botrytis, and during senescence.
Control | High Light | Control | Botrytis | Control | Senescence | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# Chloroplasts Palisade (n = 100 each) |
8.7 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.4*** | 17.3 ± 0.4 | 9.1 ± 0.4*** | 12.9 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.2*** |
# Chloroplasts Spongy (n = 100 each) | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.3*** | 7.9 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.3*** | 9.4 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2*** |
Chloroplast size in μm2 (n = 30 each) | 9.4 ± 1.0 | 4.8 ± 0.5** | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.3*** | 10.4 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.2*** |
% Stroma | 65.8 ± 2.6 | 82.7 ± 2.6** | 62.0 ± 0.4 | 69.0 ± 1.3ns | 55.4 ± 1.7 | 57.2 ± 1.7ns |
% Thylakoids | 20.7 ± 1.1 | 16.2 ± 1.1** | 24.5 ± 0.8 | 15.6 ± 0.7*** | 27.2 ± 1.0 | 13.2 ± 1.0*** |
% Starch | 12.9 ± 2.7 | 0.0*** | 12.9 ± 1.6 | 0.0*** | 17.2 ± 1.6 | 0.0*** |
% Plastoglobules | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.0*** | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 15.4 ± 0.1*** | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 29.6 ± 0.1*** |
Data are means with standard errors and represent the number (#) of chloroplasts in palisade and spongy parenchyma on semi-thin sections of leaves, the area of chloroplasts in μm2, and the relative areas in percent of stroma, thylakoids, starch, and plastoglobules on ultra-thin sections of cells. These data have been used to calculate the changes displayed in Figs 2 and 3. The number of chloroplasts was determined on at least 100 sectioned cells for each treatment by light microscopy while the size and ultrastructure of chloroplasts was determined on at least 30 sectioned chloroplasts for each treatment by TEM. Significant differences between stressed plants and the according controls were calculated using the Mann- Whitney U test
** and *** indicate a significance at a level of confidence of p<0.01 and p<0.001; ns = not significant different.
The ultrastructure of chloroplasts showed significant changes after the exposure to abiotic and biotic stress. The size of chloroplasts on ultra-thin cross-section decreased significantly when plants were subject to high light (49%), Botrytis infection (58%), and senescence (71%). Thylakoid areas decreased significantly on cross-sections of chloroplasts exposed to high light (22%), inoculated with Botrytis cinerea (36%), and during dark-induced senescence (51%). A 100% decrease of starch was observed during all stress scenarios (Fig 3). The area of stroma significantly increased in cross-sections of chloroplasts of plants exposed to high light conditions (26%) and remained statistically unchanged in plants during Botrytis infection and dark induced senescence (Fig 3). Plastoglobules showed a strong increase of 88% on cross-sections of chloroplasts from plants exposed to high light, 2,306% in plants inoculated with Botrytis cinerea, and 19,617% in plants during dark-induced senescence (Fig 3, Table 1).
Discussion
High light stress, Botrytis infection, and senescence had similar effects on the ultrastructure of chloroplasts. In all three cases the number and size of chloroplasts, areas of thylakoids, and starch significantly decreased on cross-sections of leaves. Similar effects have also been observed in other plants under similar circumstances [37, 38, 39]. During Botrytis cinerea infection changes in size and ultrastructure of chloroplasts can be attributed to the accumulation of reactive oxyigen species (ROS), especially hydrogen peroxide, in this organelle [18,19] which activates apoptotic like programmed cell death (PCD) [20,40]. These events are especially pronounced at the final phases of Botrytis infection when the fungus switches from the biotrophic to necrotrophic life style and the plant reacts with cell death to block fungal growth [19,20,40]. Similar effects on chloroplast size, number, and ultrastructure were also found in cross-sections of leaves during dark-induced senescence, which is a highly regulated process mediated by a genetic program which remobilizes nutrients from the aging organs to support growth and development of younger ones or to store remobilized nutrients in seeds or perennial tissue [12,41]. The accumulation of ROS, especially hydrogen peroxide, in chloroplasts seems to be the main trigger for PCD during dark induced senescence which leads to chloroplast degradation, the reduction of photosynthetic efficiency, and a decrease of chlorophyll [42,43]. During Botrytis infection and senescence chloroplasts are considered to be the primary source and target of PCD as they host genes involved in PCD (e.g. accelerated death 2), can release cytochrome f into the cytosol which triggers PCD, and produce ROS which destroys membranes and proteins and induce hypersensitive response [40]. Thus, it is not surprising that thylakoids were strongly reduced in cross-sections of chloroplasts exposed to Botrytis infection and during senescence in this study. ROS damage thylakoids through a process called lipid peroxidation which compromises membrane leakage and integrity [44,45]. Additionally, the accumulation of ROS in chloroplasts during Botrytis infection and senescence can activate gene expression leading to PCD [46,47].
The exposure of plants to high light led to similar changes in chloroplast size, number, and ultrastructure on cross-sections of leaves as observed during Botrytis infection and senescence. High light stress leads to photodamage in chloroplast through the accumulation of ROS which oxidize membranes and inhibit repair of photodamaged photosystem II [45,47,48]. Thus, a decrease in chloroplast size and changes in the ultrastructure such as degeneration of thylakoids seem to be a logical consequence. The degradation of thylakoids, observed in this study, correlated with an increase in the size of plastoglobules on cross-sections of chloroplasts, which is not surprising as they are physically connected to the outer membrane of thylakoids and appear to participate in the formation and degradation of thylakoids during plant growth and development, stress, and senescence [12,13]. The breakdown of chlorophyll and subsequently thylakoids is a commonly observed reaction of plants to high light stress [49], Botrytis cinerea infection [39], and during senescence [37,38]. Under these conditions, components of thylakoids such as carotenoids, fatty acids, and prenyl quinones are deposited into plastoglobules [50,51]. Additionally, it has been proposed that catabolic products released from thylakoids during senescence such as pheophytin pheophorbide hydrolase, triacylglycerol, fatty acid phytylester, get deposited into plastoglobules [12,13]. Thus, the massive increase in the size of plastoglobules in cross-sections of chloroplasts in this study can be attributed to the deposition of thylakoid membrane components which were degraded during the exposure of plants to high light, Botrytis infection, and senescence.
It is also important to mention that starch contents in cross-sections of chloroplasts were strongly decreased in all three investigated stress scenarios. During high light conditions plants immediately react with the remobilization of starch which increases soluble sugars levels. This reaction is aimed to provide energy and carbon to the plant as high light conditions lead to photoinhibition and decreased rates of carbon fixation [52,53,54]. During senescence plants react with the hydrolysis of starch and accumulation of soluble sugars [43]. Since leaf senescence can be stimulated in the presence of glucose [55,56] and mutants with impaired sugar sensing capabilities show delayed senescence [57] it seems that the accumulation of soluble sugars is an important factor for the induction of senescence. Thus, it seems that the decrease of starch contents in cross-sections of chloroplasts in all three investigated scenarios is caused by reduction of starch to soluble sugars and by the degeneration of thylakoids which negatively interferes with photosynthesis.
Conclusions
Considering the ultrastructural changes observed in this study it can be concluded that the size of chloroplasts and their ultrastructure are well suited as a stress marker for plants for abiotic and biotic stress. In this context the least costly and least labor-intensive process is to simply determine the number and size of chloroplasts on leaf sections of chloroplasts with the light microscope. For a more detailed evaluation, contents of starch and plastoglobules on-cross sections of chloroplasts are well suited. While starch completely disappeared, plastoglobules showed a massive increase of up to 19,617% on cross-sections of chloroplasts during dark-induces senescence. Thus, the absence of starch and the occurrence of large plastoglobules can also be regarded as a stress marker in plants which can be evaluated by TEM.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding Statement
The author received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Chen Y, Zhou B, Li J, Tang H, Tang J, Yan Z. Formation and change of chloroplast-located plant metabolites in response to light conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19: 654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Otegui MS. Vacuolar degradation of chloroplast components: autophagy and beyond. J Exp Bot. 2018;69: 741–750. 10.1093/jxb/erx234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thalmann M, Santelia D. Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytol. 2017;214: 943–951. 10.1111/nph.14491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brunkard JO, Burch-Smith T. Ties that bind: the integration of plastid signaling pathways in plant cell metabolism. Essays Biochem. 2018;62: 95–107. 10.1042/EBC20170011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chan KX, Phua SY, Crisp P, McQuinn R, Pogson BJ. Learning the languages of the chloroplast: Retrograde signaling and beyond. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016;67: 25–53. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rochaix JD, Ramundo S. Chloroplast signaling and quality control. Essays Biochem. 2017;62: 13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dogra V, Rochaix J-D, Kim C. Singlet oxygen-triggered chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signalling pathways: An emerging perspective. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41: 1727–1738. 10.1111/pce.13332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liebers M, Grübler B, Chevaller F, Lerbs-Mache S, Merendino L, Blanvillain R, Pfannschmidt T. Regulatory shifts in plastid transcription play a key role in morphological conversions of plastids during plant development. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8: 23 10.3389/fpls.2017.00023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zechmann B, Müller M, Zellnig G. Membrane associated qualitative differences in cell ultrastructure of chemically and high pressure cryofixed plant cells. J Struc Biol. 2007;158: 370–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jensen PE, Leister D. Chloroplast evolution, structure, and function. F1000 Prime Rep. 2014;6: 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pribil M, Labs M, Leister D. Structure and dynamics of thylakoids in land plants. J Exp Bot. 2014;65: 1955–1972. 10.1093/jxb/eru090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rottet S, Besagni C, Kessler F. The role of plastoglobules in thylakoid lipid remodeling during plant development. Biochim et Biophys Acta 2015;1847: 889–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Wijk KJ, Kessler F. Plastoglobuli: plastid microcompartments with integrated functions in metabolism, plastid developmental transitions, and environmental adaptation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2017; 68: 253–289. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Asada K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. PlantPhysiol. 2006;141: 391–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim C, Meskauskiene R, Apel K. Laloi C. No single way to understand singlet oxygen signaling in plants. EMBO Rep. 2008;9: 435–439. 10.1038/embor.2008.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pfannschmidt T, Bräutigam K, Wagner R, Dietzel L, Schröter Y, Steiner S, et al. Potential regulation of gene expression in photosynthetic cells by redox and energy state: approaches towards better understanding. Ann Bot. 2009;103, 599–607. 10.1093/aob/mcn081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zechmann B. 2014. Compartment specific importance of glutathione during abiotic and biotic stress. Frontiers in Plant Sci.—Plant Phys. 2014;5: 566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Simon KU, Polanschütz LM, Koffler BE, Zechmann B. High resolution imaging of temporal and spatial changes of subcellular ascorbate, glutathione and H2O2 distribution during Botrytis cinerea infection in Arabidopsis. PloS ONE 2013;8(6): e65811 10.1371/journal.pone.0065811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rossi FR, Krapp AR, Bisaro F, Maiale SJ, Pieckenstein FL, Carillo N. Reactive oxygen species generated in chloroplasts contribute to tobacco leaf infection by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Plant J. 2017;92: 761–773. 10.1111/tpj.13718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Veloso J, van Kan AL. Many shades of grey in Botrytis-host plant interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23/7: 613–622. 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Austin JR II, Frost E, Vidi P-A, Kessler F, Staehelin LA. Plastoglobules are lipoprotein subcompartments of the chloroplast that are permanently coupled to thylakoid membranes and contain biosynthetic enzymes. Plant Cell 2006;18:1693–1703. 10.1105/tpc.105.039859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ytterberg AJ, Peltier JB, van Wijk KJ. Protein profiling of plastoglobules in chloroplasts and chromoplasts. A surprising site for differential accumulation of metabolic enzymes. Plant Physiol. 2006;140:984–997. 10.1104/pp.105.076083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zellnig G, Zechmann B, Perktold A. Morphological and quantitative data of plastids and mitochondria within drought stressed spinach leaves. Protoplasma 2004;223: 221–227. 10.1007/s00709-003-0034-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zellnig G, Perktold A, Zechmann B. Fine structural quantification of drought stressed Picea abies (L.) organelles based on 3D reconstructions. Protoplasma 2010;243: 129–136. 10.1007/s00709-009-0058-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shao RX, Xin LF, Zheng HF, Li LL, Ran WL, Mao J, Yang QH. Changes in chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves of drought-stressed maize inbred lines. Photosynthetica 2016;54: 74–80. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lichtenthaler HK. Biosynthesis, accumulation and emission of carotenoids, a-tocopherol, plastoquinone, and isoprene in leaves under high photosynthetic irradiance. Photosynth Res. 2007;92: 163–179. 10.1007/s11120-007-9204-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duan Q, Jiang W, Ding M, Lin Y, Huang D. Light affects the chloroplast ultrastructure and post-storage photosynthetic performance of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) plug seedlings. PlosOne 2014;9/10: e111165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vidović M, Morina F, Milić S, Albert A, Zechmann B, Tosti T, et al. Carbon allocation from source to sink leaf tissue in relation to flavonoid biosynthesis in variegated Pelargonium zonale under UV-B radiation and high PAR: different strategies for photoprotection. Plant Phys Biochem. 2015;93: 44–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ghosh S, Mahoney SR, Penterman JN, Peirson D, Dumbroff EB. Ultrastructural and biochemical changes in chloroplasts during Brassica napus senescence. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001;39: 777–784. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zechmann B, Müller M, Zellnig G. Cytological modifications in zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV)-infected Styrian pumpkin plants. Archiv Virol. 2003;148: 1119–1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zellnig G, Möstl S, Graggaber G, Zechmann B. Three dimensional reconstruction of tobacco mosaic virus induced structural changes in Nicotiana tabacum. Phyton 2014;54: 343–352. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zellnig G, Pöckl MH, Möstl S, Zechmann B . Two and three dimensional characterization of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus induced structural alterations in Cucurbita pepo L. plants. J Struct Biol. 2014;186: 245–252. 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hernandez JA, Rubio M, Olmos E, Ros-Barcelo A, Martinez-Gomez P. Oxidative stress induced by long-termplum pox virus infection in peach (Prunus persica L. cv GF305). Physiol Plant. 2004;122: 486–495. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Munne-Bosch S, Alegre L. Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct Plant Biol. 2004;31: 203–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wrischer ML, Ljubesic N, Devide Z. Transformation of plastids in the leaf of Acer negundo L. var. odessanum (Rothe). J Cell Sci. 1975;18: 509–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhao J, Zhang X, Hong Y, Liu Y. Chloroplast in plant-virus interaction. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 1565 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Minamikawa T, Toyooka K, Okamoto T, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M. Degradation of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase by vacuolar enzymes of senescing French bean leaves: immunocytochemical and ultrastructural observations. Protoplasma 2001;218: 144–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wada S, Ishida H, Izumi M, Yoshimoto K, Ohsumi Y, Mae T, Makino A. Autophagy plays a role in chloroplast degradation during senescence in individually darkened leaves. Plant Physiol. 2009;149: 885–893. 10.1104/pp.108.130013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gabara B, Kuzinak E, Sklodowska M, Surowka E, Miszalski Z. Ultrastructural and metabolic modifications at the plant-pathogen interface in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum leaves infected by Botrytis cinereal. Environ Exp Bot. 2012;77: 33–43. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ambastha V, Tripahty BC, Tiwari BS. Programmed cell death in plants: A chloroplastic connection. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10: 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Thomas H. Senescence, ageing and death of the whole plant. New Phytol. 2013;197: 696–711. 10.1111/nph.12047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Luschin-Ebengreuth N, Zechmann B. Compartment specific investigations of antioxidants and hydrogen peroxide in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana during dark induced senescence. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38: 133 10.1007/s11738-016-2150-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wojciechowska N, Sobieszczuk-Nowicka E, Bagniewska-Zadworna A. Plant organ senescence—regulation by manifold pathways. Plant Biol. 2018;20: 167–181. 10.1111/plb.12672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Itri R, Junqueira HC, Mertins O, Baptista MS. Membrane changes under oxidative stress: the impact of oxidized lipids. Biophysical Rev. 2014;6: 47–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Farmer EE, Mueller MJ. ROS-mediated lipid peroxidation and RES-activated signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64: 429–450. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jajic I, Sarna T, Strzalka K. Senescence, stress, and reactive oxygen species. Plants 2015;4, 393–411. 10.3390/plants4030393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Singh R, Singh S, Parihar P, Mishra RK, Tripathi DK, Singh VP, et al. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS): Beneficial Companions of Plants’ Developmental Processes. Front Plant Sci. 2014;7: 1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Foyer CH. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative signaling and the regulation of photosynthesis. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;154: 134–142. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Szymanska R, Slesak I, Orzechowska A, Kruk J. Physiological and biochemical responses to high light and temperature stress in plants. Environ Exp Bot. 2017;139: 165–177. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tevini M, Steinmüller D. Composition and function of plastoglobuli II. Lipid composition of leaves and plastoglobuli during beech leaf senescence. Planta 1985;163: 91–96. 10.1007/BF00395902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Steinmüller D, Tevini M. Composition and function of plastoglobuli I. Isolation and purification from chloroplasts and chromoplasts. Planta 1985;163: 201–207. 10.1007/BF00393507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bläsing OE, Gibon Y, Günther M, Höhne M, Morcuende R, Osuna D, et al. Sugars and circadian regulation make major contributions to the global regulation of diurnal gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005;17: 3257–3281. 10.1105/tpc.105.035261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Obata T, Fernie AR. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69: 3225–3243. 10.1007/s00018-012-1091-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gururani MA, Venkatesh J, Tran, Tran L-SP. Regulation of photosynthesis during abiotic stress-induced photoinhibition. Mol Plant. 2015;8: 1304–1320. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pourtau N, Jennings R, Pelzer E, Pallas J, Wingler A. Effect of sugar-induced senescence on gene expression and implications for the regulation of senescence in Arabidopsis. Planta 2006;224: 556–568. 10.1007/s00425-006-0243-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wingler A, Purdy S, MacLean JA, Pourtau N. The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot. 2006;57: 391–399. 10.1093/jxb/eri279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moore B, Zhou L, Rolland F, Hall Q, Cheng W-H, Liu Y-X, et al. Role of the Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science. 2003;300: 332–336. 10.1126/science.1080585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript.