Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Feb 21;103(7):2947–2958. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09690-6

Incorporation of non-standard amino acids into proteins: Challenges, recent achievements, and emerging applications

Xing Jin 1, Oh-Jin Park 1,2, Seok Hoon Hong 1,*
PMCID: PMC6449208  NIHMSID: NIHMS1522318  PMID: 30790000

Abstract

The natural genetic code only allows for 20 standard amino acids in protein translation, but genetic code reprogramming enables the incorporation of non-standard amino acids (NSAAs). Proteins containing NSAAs provide enhanced or novel properties and open diverse applications. With increased attention to the recent advancements in synthetic biology, various improved and novel methods have been developed to incorporate single and multiple distinct NSAAs into proteins. However, various challenges remain in regard to NSAA incorporation, such as low yield and misincorporation. In this review, we summarize the recent efforts to improve NSAA incorporation by utilizing orthogonal translational system optimization, cell-free protein synthesis, genomically recoded organisms, artificial codon boxes, quadruplet codons, and orthogonal ribosomes, before closing with a discussion of the emerging applications of NSAA incorporation.

Keywords: non-standard amino acids, genetic code expansion, synthetic biology, orthogonal translational system

Introduction

In nature, the genetic code defines how 64 triplet codons translate into 20 standard amino acids. However, synthetic expansion of the genetic code enables the direct translational incorporation of nonstandard amino acids (NSAAs) (Li and Liu 2014). To date, more than 200 distinct NSAAs have been incorporated into proteins (Vargas-Rodriguez et al. 2018). The incorporation of NSAAs provides enhanced or novel protein properties and thus enables diverse applications of this technology (Liu and Schultz 2010; Kang et al. 2018). The incorporation of NSAAs helps us manipulate the physiochemical and biological properties of proteins, thereby enabling a range of promising applications (Liu and Schultz 2010), such as new approaches to the probing, imaging, and control of protein function and the precise engineering of therapeutics (Chin 2017). Although numerous previous studies have illustrated NSAA incorporation, many challenges remain in the practical application of this technology. Several seminal works review advances in in vitro genetic code reprogramming (Hong et al. 2014a; Quast et al. 2015; Katoh et al. 2018), the in vivo incorporation of NSAAs in enzyme engineering (Ravikumar et al. 2015), the importance of tRNA design (Uhlenbeck and Schrader 2018), the natural incorporation of NSAAs and challenges of their misincorporation into recombinant proteins (Reitz et al. 2018), and the study of protein function (Neumann-Staubitz and Neumann 2016). In this review, we focus on the recent achievements aimed at overcoming the challenges of NSAA incorporation and the emerging applications of proteins containing NSAAs.

Mechanisms of non-standard amino acid incorporation

In the natural protein translation process, an amino acid is first charged onto a transfer RNA (tRNA) by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) using a specific anti-codon. Then, the amino acid-charged tRNA is delivered by the elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) to the ribosome, where translation occurs. However, expansion of the genetic code provides the possibility of incorporating NSAAs by assigning each NSAA to one of the redundant sense or stop codons (Forster et al. 2003) or to extra codons beyond the 64 triplet codons (Katoh et al. 2018). Among the diversity of genetic code expansion approaches, amber suppression, in which an NSAA is assigned to the amber codon (UAG), is preferably used for NSAA incorporation because the amber codon is rarely used in organisms (e.g., only 321 of 4505 stop codons in E. coli MG1655 (Lajoie et al. 2013; Keseler et al. 2017)), in contrast to the other two stop codons.

The site-specific incorporation of NSAAs uses an orthogonal translation system (OTS) similar to the natural translation process (Fig. 1). The OTS requires exploitation of the orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pair that effectively charges the specific NSAA onto the tRNA with the reassigned codon. An ideal orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pair does not cross-react with the endogenous amino acids, aaRSs, or tRNAs in the host cell but can be recognized by the host ribosome (Dumas et al. 2015). To achieve site specificity, the orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pairs are generated from phylogenetically distinct organisms (Kim et al. 2013). For example, the tyrosyl(Tyr)-RS/tRNACUA pair derived from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is orthogonal to that from Escherichia coli and other bacteria, and pyrrolysyl(Pyl)-RS/tRNACUA pairs from certain methanogens (e.g., Methanosarcina barkeri and Methanosarcina mazei) are orthogonal in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (Chin 2014). The orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pairs have been engineered to incorporate different types of NSAAs and improve the incorporation efficiency (Dumas et al. 2015).

Figure 1. Scheme of non-standard amino acid incorporation using an orthogonal translation system via amber suppression.

Figure 1.

Orthogonal aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, o-aaRS; non-standard amino acid, NSAA; orthogonal tRNA, o-tRNA; elongation factor Tu, EF-Tu. The anti-amber codon sequence on o-tRNA is CUA.

Challenges and improvements of NSAA incorporation

Issues of poor NSAA incorporation efficiency, orthogonality between NSAAs and standard amino acids, and the ability to incorporate multiple distinct NSAAs must be addressed so that NSAA incorporation can be comparable to native amino acid incorporation. Recently, various approaches have been developed and further improved to address these challenges. These approaches include optimizing translation machineries, using in vitro protein synthesis, and applying genome engineering.

OTS optimization

The development of numerous OTSs promises the potential for advancements in the incorporation of NSAAs; nonetheless, the slow charging of NSAA to orthogonal tRNA, slow delivery by the elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), and slow translation in the ribosome impede NSAA incorporation efficiency (O’Donoghue et al. 2013; Hong et al. 2014a). Previous studies improved NSAA incorporation efficiency by engineering orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pairs (Young and Schultz 2010; Chatterjee et al. 2012), EF-Tu (Park et al. 2011), and controlling the transcription and translation rates (Young and Schultz 2010; Chatterjee et al. 2013). However, these advances have been restricted to proteins containing a single or few NSAAs with low efficiency and accuracy. Further improvement of the NSAA incorporation efficiency is still required. Recently, Gruic-Sovulj group reported the importance of the aaRS and tRNA in post-transfer editing for high-fidelity translation of the amino acids (Dulic et al. 2018), suggesting that understanding of the binding and catalytic functions of aaRSs to substrates is important to promote orthogonal translation.

While previous studies have mostly focused on the optimization of components in the orthogonal translational system with the incorporation of one NSAA, increasing the number of NSAA incorporation sites in a protein significantly decreases the incorporation efficiency by generating truncated immature proteins or the misincorporation of endogenous amino acids (Johnson et al. 2011). Gan et al. evolved aaRS and EF-Tu and tuned the expression of the evolved translation machinery components in a single vector, thereby enhancing the NSAA incorporation efficiency (Gan et al. 2017). These researchers found that mutant aaRS improved activity by 8-fold, while engineered EF-Tu enhanced the production yield by 4-fold in single-site NSAA incorporation; however, the co-production of aaRS and EF-Tu reduced the production of superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) compared to that of aaRS only. Therefore, 27 plasmids containing diverse promotor combinations with orthogonal aaRS, orthogonal tRNA, and EF-Tu were constructed to optimize the NSAA incorporation efficiency. By combining the best mutants and tuning the expression levels, the researchers achieved a 2-, 10-, and 5-fold increase in the incorporation of NSAA into 1, 3, and 5 UAG sites, respectively, compared to the progenitor enzymes (Gan et al. 2017). This study demonstrates that EF-Tu engineering (improving delivery) combined with aaRS/tRNA optimization (improving NSAA charging) improves the NSAA incorporation efficiency. Moreover, the authors suggested that coordinate optimization of translation machinery as a complex system (including codons, tRNA, aaRS, EF-Tu and the ribosome) further improves the NSAA incorporation efficiency. Bryson et al. employed phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) selections to rapidly produce highly active and selective orthogonal aaRSs through hundreds of generations of evolution (Bryson et al. 2017). The PACE of a chimeric Methanosarcina spp. PylRS improved its enzymatic activity (kcat/KMtRNA) by 45-fold compared to the parent enzyme, and transplantation of the evolved mutations into other PylRS-derived synthetases increased yields of proteins containing NSAAs up to 9.7-fold. In addition, the PACE of a promiscuous M. jannaschii TyrRS variant significantly improved the selectivity for the site-specific incorporation of p-iodo-L-phenylalanine. These studies offer new aaRSs with the enhanced utility of OTSs.

Cell-free protein synthesis

Studies of NSAA incorporation have predominantly been conducted using live cells. However, NSAA incorporation in vivo often causes problems of toxicity to the host cell and poor delivery of the NSAA inside the cells. Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) is a protein synthesis methodology that does not require living cells. CFPS utilizes crude cell extracts to enable transcriptional and translational machinery for protein production (Swartz et al. 2004). The addition of energy sources, cofactors, buffers, salts, nucleotides, and amino acids further mimics cytoplasmic environments to enhance the CFPS (Jin and Hong 2018). To enable NSAA incorporation in vitro, NSAA, orthogonal tRNA, and orthogonal aaRS are also required (Fig. 2A). The toxicity associated with the overexpression of the orthogonal tRNA/aaRS pair is not considered because no live cells are involved during the cell-free reaction (Hong et al. 2014a), and the openness of the reaction environment without cell walls and membranes enables the direct addition of NSAAs into the translation reaction. In addition to supplying OTSs in CFPS reactions (Noren et al. 1989), several other approaches have recently been applied to improve NSAA incorporation. One method is to co-express the orthogonal tRNA and the target gene simultaneously (Albayrak and Swartz 2013). A transzyme construct containing a hammer-head ribozyme that cleaves the 5’-end of tRNA upon transcription (Fechter et al. 1998) increased orthogonal tRNA supplement in the CFPS reaction. The use of optimized orthogonal tRNA enhances the recognition of tRNA by E. coli EF-Tu (Young et al. 2010) and further enhanced the NSAA incorporation efficiency compared to the original orthogonal tRNA. With this approach, 0.9 ~ 1.7 mg/mL of modified soluble GFP containing NSAA was produced with 50 ~ 88% incorporation efficiency (Albayrak and Swartz 2013). Bundy and colleagues prepared the cell extracts to contain active orthogonal tRNA and aaRS by expressing the orthogonal components during the cell growth in the optimized fermentation condition prior to cell lysing. Modified CFPS systems using OTS-containing extract improved the yield of proteins with NSAA by as much as 150% compared to the standard CFPS when OTS are produced or supplied during the reaction (Smith et al. 2014). Moreover, CFPS was developed as a rapid screening tool for NSAA-containing protein production. Schinn et al. investigated the efficiency of stop codon suppression at various positions within a protein by utilizing CFPS technology and screening 24 different T4-lysozyme mutants with randomly assigned and distinct NSAA incorporation sites (Schinn et al. 2017). The efficiency of NSAA incorporation was measured with green fluorescence by tagging the NSAA-containing T4-lysozyme with a GFP fragment that was self-assembled with the rest of the GFP fragments to form active GFP (Cabantous et al. 2005). The CFPS approach enabled the rapid characterization of the positional effect of NSAA incorporation at different locations within the protein. Taken together, CFPS provides the rapid and simple production of modified proteins with NSAA with high incorporation efficiency and yield compared to in vivo incorporation.

Figure 2. A) NSAA incorporation using a cell-free protein synthesis reaction.

Figure 2.

Cell extracts containing transcription/translation machinery, co-factors, energy sources and other components are added to the reaction to mimic the bacterial environment. The addition of the o-aaRS/o-tRNA pair, NSAA and plasmid DNA template containing amber sites enables NSAA incorporation. B) Genomically recoded organism evolution via multiplex automated genome engineering (MAGE). Single-strand DNA oligos are added to the MAGE cycle to mutate multiple genomic locations simultaneously. C) Redundant sense codon reassignment. Codons for the standard amino acid (SAA) are artificially reprogramed for NSAA. N denotes A, U, G or C. D) Orthogonal ribosome and quadruplet codon. The orthogonal ribosome is developed by recognizing the orthogonal ribosome binding site (o-RBS) and tethering the 50S subunit and orthogonal 30S subunit. The orthogonal ribosome translates orthogonal mRNA containing o-RBS and incorporates NSAAs via quadruplet codon and amber codon suppression.

Genomically recoded strain development

The NSAA incorporation efficiency with amber codon suppression is inhibited by release factor 1 (RF1), which terminates protein translation by recognizing the amber codon, although the deletion of RF1 is lethal to the host cell (Voloshchuk and Montclare 2010; Hong et al. 2014a). However, a recent advancement in genetic engineering enabled the construction of E. coli with an RF1 knockout but retained viability by fixing release factor 2 to be more efficient in terminating all UAA codons that are found in-frame after the UAG stop codon (Johnson et al. 2011), as well as by improving the efficiency of the UAG triplet decoding process (Ohtake et al. 2012). Lajoie et al. first constructed a genomically recoded E. coli strain by reassigning all 321 UAG codons to UAA codons via multiplex automatable genome engineering (MAGE) and thereby deleted RF1 without any growth defects (Lajoie et al. 2013). These researchers demonstrated that the genomically recoded strain exhibits a greater NSAA incorporation efficiency compared to the native strain.

Genomically recoded E. coli has become a foundational platform for improving NSAA incorporation in vivo as well as in vitro (Fig. 2B). Recently, Amiram et al. evolved the orthogonal translation machinery to enhance the NSAA incorporation efficiency and achieve multi-site NSAA incorporation by using genetically recoded E. coli as a host (Amiram et al. 2015). The authors screened a library of orthogonal aaRS variants to improve the efficiency of three sites of NSAA incorporation and found that one aaRS variant enhanced GFP production by 25-fold compared to the progenitor aaRS. Furthermore, the engineered orthogonal aaRS was able to successfully incorporate 30 NSAAs at one time into elastin-like polypeptides at 50 mg/L production yield and over 95% accuracy. Hong et al. utilized partially recoded RF1-deleted E.coli to prove the importance of removing RF1 for activating efficient and multiple site-specific NSAA incorporations (Hong et al. 2014b). The RF1-deficient cell extract prepared from the RF1-deficient strain improved the yield of modified GFP containing an NSAA p-propargyloxy-L-phenylalanine by more than 250% compared to the RF1-present cell-free reaction, and sfGFP derived from multiple NSAAs and containing two and five amber sites was easily achieved without RF1 (Hong et al. 2014b). RF-deficient CFPS has been further advanced by eliminating negative effectors in the E. coli cell extract to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of single and multiple NSAA incorporation strategies (Hong et al. 2015; Martin et al. 2018). By disrupting the genes that encode negative effectors (endA, gor, rne, and mazF) via MAGE (Fig. 2B) in the completely recoded E. coli genome (Martin et al. 2018), cell extract activity was significantly increased, yielding sfGFP in concentrations that were 1,700 mg/L, over 4-fold greater than those of the progenitor strains. They further demonstrated that the incorporation of 40 p-acetyl-L-phenylalanine residues into an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) results in an 85% ELP production yield and 98% accuracy with the cell extract upon the deletion of these negative effectors.

Adaptive evolution also has been applied to convert a native amino acid into an NSAA. Hoesl et al. demonstrated that a long-term cultivation experiment in defined synthetic media resulted in the evolution of cells that were capable of surviving in the presence of NSAA L-β-(thieno[3,2-b]pyrrolyl)alanine instead of tryptophan (Hoesl et al. 2015). The Shultz group recently reported that the functional replacement of amino acid residues with NSAAs in proteins generated NSAA-dependent organisms whose growth is strictly dependent on the presence of the NSAA, p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (Koh et al. 2017), and 3-methyl-L-histidine (Gan et al. 2018). Generating organisms that are dependent on the presence of an NSAA is useful for the generation of live vaccines and the biological containment of recombinant organisms (Rovner et al. 2015).

Artificial codon box division

NSAA incorporation with amber suppression has been widely used and studied, but this method can only incorporate one type of NSAA. To simultaneously incorporate various NSAAs into one protein, artificial codons have been generated (Link and Tirrell 2005; Krishnakumar and Ling 2014). In the natural genetic codon box, 18 of the standard amino acids, except for methionine and tryptophan, are coded by multiple triplet codons, which means that there are duplicate codons that can be reassigned to NSAAs (Fig. 2C). Iwane et al. developed the artificial division of natural codon boxes to incorporate various NSAAs (Iwane et al. 2016). They replaced redundant tRNASNN (N = A, C, G or U; S = G or C) with the NSAA-pre-charged tRNASNN. Using this artificial division of the genetic box, the authors successfully incorporated three distinct NSAAs into a 32-mer linear peptide and five distinct NSAAs into a 14-mer macrocyclic peptide in vitro. More recently, Zhang et al. utilized an unnatural base pair (dNaM-dTPT3) to direct the incorporation of NSAA into proteins (Zhang et al. 2017). The study authors generated an E. coli strain that contains an unnatural base pair in its plasmid DNA. Upon the transcription of DNA containing dNaM and dTPT3 into mRNAs, sfGFP containing the unnatural codon AXC (X denotes NaM) was decoded by an unnatural tRNA containing the anticodon GYT (Y denotes TPT3) at the ribosome. By adding another unnatural codon GXC and using an evolved orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pair, the authors demonstrated that two distinct NSAAs could be site-specifically incorporated into sfGFP. Rewriting a genetic code with artificial codon box divisions demonstrates the possibility of incorporating multiple distinct NSAAs into a single protein.

Quadruplet codon and orthogonal ribosome

In addition to the artificial division of the triplet codon box, a quadruplet codon was used to simultaneously incorporate three distinct NSAAs into streptavidin, although a low expression level was obtained due to the resulting truncated byproducts (Ohtsuki et al. 2005), which implies that the native ribosome is an inefficient decoder of the quadruplet codon. Later, this method was improved by developing an orthogonal ribosome (Ribo-Q1) by assessing 11 saturation mutagenesis libraries in the 16S ribosomal RNA (Neumann et al. 2010) of the previously evolved ribosome that had been shown to increase the decoding of amber codons (Wang et al. 2007). Ribo-Q1 enhanced the incorporation efficiency and fidelity of NSAAs with the amber codon and a series of quadruplet codons when combined with mutually orthogonal aaRS/tRNA pairs (Fig. 2D). This approach illustrates the possibility of incorporating more than 200 NSAAs into one protein via quadruplet codons. Recently, Orelle et al. attempted to separate orthogonal translation from native translation by developing ribosomes with tethered subunits (Orelle et al. 2015). Covalently linked 16S and 23S ribosomal RNAs enabled a functional ribosome that was only able to translate orthogonal mRNA without affecting natural translation by the native ribosome (Fig. 2D). Ribosome design and engineering provide the potential for the development of synthetic biomanufacturing machines (d’Aquino et al. 2018). Improving the NSAA incorporation efficiency and expanding the genetic code will be further advanced by the evolution of orthogonal ribosomes.

Emerging Applications of NSAA incorporation

NSAA incorporation enables the creation of novel functional proteins and biopolymers that have been either difficult or impossible to achieve due to the limited repertoire of 20 standard amino acids (Mukai et al. 2011). With advancements in NSAA incorporation, innovative emerging applications in medical and industrial areas have recently been demonstrated.

Real-time tracking and imaging in vivo

Resident microbes in the gut microbiome closely interact with host cells and affect the human physiology. Thus, developing an understanding of these interactions will result in new diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic capabilities (Shreiner et al. 2015). An ideal real-time tracking system of gut microbes in vivo should be noninvasive and provide spatiotemporal localization; unfortunately, the existing methods are either invasive or indirect. Recently, the Joshi group developed a real-time tracking method employing NSAA incorporation in vivo within the gastrointestinal tract (Praveschotinunt et al. 2018). The researchers incorporated p-azido-L-phenylalanine into a cell surface protein, CsgA, in probiotic E. coli using amber suppression and labeled the engineered strain with a Cy5 dye and dibenzocycloctyl via a copper-free click reaction. This approach showed a high fluorescence intensity within 24 h after oral administration of the dye and while using an in vivo imaging system that enabled the spatiotemporal monitoring of specific microbial populations in the gastrointestinal tract.

Installing artificial probes and reactive moieties directly onto proteins in the live cell is also an interesting objective that could be achieved through the incorporation of NSAAs. A robust fluorescence-based assay to evaluate the efficiency of orthogonal pairs in mammalian cells enabled the screening of tens to hundreds of orthogonal aaRS/tRNA variants (Serfling et al. 2018). This approach was used both to incorporate chemical probes into G-protein-coupled receptors for photo-crosslink mapping and to achieve biocatalyst-free receptor labeling with a fluorescent dye via biorthogonal chemistry in the live cell. Bioorthogonal reactions in living systems have been increasingly studied, and pretargeted imaging methods and therapies using reactive monoclonal antibodies are some of the most developed applications toward clinical testing (Devaraj 2018). Reactive NSAAs will contribute to further improvement and applications of such pretargeted approaches. In addition, the development of peptide- and protein-nanoparticle conjugates via NSAA incorporation can be used for biomedical applications such as nano-drug delivery vehicles, imaging species, and active therapeutics (Spicer et al. 2018).

Biomolecular targeting

Because some NSAAs are able to bind or react with small molecules and metal ions, genetically encoded fluorescent probes for the detection of ions such as Cu2+ (Ayyadurai et al. 2011), Mn3+ (Liu et al. 2014), and peroxynitrite (ONOO) (Chen et al. 2013) have been studied. Recently, the Schultz group developed a genetically encoded fluorescent probe to monitor the protein sirtuin activities in living cells (Xuan et al. 2017). The misregulation of sirtuin activities leads to a number of diseases including cancer, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (Imai and Guarente 2014). NSAA N-ε-acetyl-L-lysine was incorporated by replacing lysine-85 in the enhanced GFP (EGFP), which resulted in a non-fluorescent labeler, but upon subsequent deacetylation by sirtuin, fluorescent EGFP was formed. This fluorescent probe could be used to monitor sirtuin activity in bacteria and in mammalian cells (Xuan et al. 2017). More recently, chemoselective reactive pyrrolysine anologues were site-specifically incorporated into proteins using a CFPS platform allowing site-direct fluorescence labeling of target proteins with wide range of different chemoselective reactions (Gerrits et al. 2019).

NSAA incorporation also allows for the identification of protein-protein interactions (Wang 2017a; Nguyen et al. 2018). Functions of proteins previously considered to be predominately useless or a nuisance can be revealed via bioreactive NSAA incorporation (Wang 2017b). Yang et al. demonstrated that NSAAs developed with a proximity-enabled reactive group, alkyl bromide, induces chemical cross-linking with the cysteine residues of the interacting protein, thereby enabling the identification of low-affinity protein binding, enzyme-substrate interaction, and endogenous protein interaction (Yang et al. 2017). Proximity-dependent cross-linking was further strengthened in combination with chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry, allowing researchers to explore the functions and structures of protein complexes (Yang et al. 2018). New chemical cross-linker functions such as sulfate-fluoride exchange (Wang et al. 2018) and oxidation-induced generation (Shang et al. 2018) are being developed and tested for proximity-enhanced protein-protein interactions. The site-specific incorporation of NSAAs was also used to mimic post-translational modification that sometimes recruits interacting partners. Zheng et al. used dual NSAA mutagenesis and found that lysine-23 acetylation at histone 3 covalently captured its interacting protein (Zheng et al. 2018). Ultimately, genetically encoded chemical cross-linkers that utilize bioactive NSAAs are crucial for identifying and understanding protein interactions.

Biocontainment

In nature, genetic elements can be transferred between certain single- and multicellular organisms via the process of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (Kubyshkin et al. 2018), which increases the diversity of living organisms and allows them to survive in harsh environments (Aminov 2011). It is also possible that the occurrence of HGT from genetically engineered organisms to native organisms may cause unexpected threats to public safety or the environment (Moe-Behrens et al. 2013). Preventing the accidental release of engineered organisms is of utmost concern and hence such studies must be strictly regulated and carried out only in closed industrial settings. However, to use new technology developed in this field in settings such as bioremediation efforts, healthcare applications, and agriculture would require intrinsic biocontainment approaches to block the distribution of engineered organisms. Alienating the genetic code from the current 20 amino acids via the incorporation of NSAAs could enable the biocontainment mechanisms in engineered cells, effectively providing them with a “genetic firewall,” i.e., orthogonality, which might prevent HGT to natural systems (Kubyshkin and Budisa 2017). Mandell et al. computationally redesigned essential enzymes in the first genomically recoded organism derived from E. coli (Lajoie et al. 2013) to require an NSAA for proper translation, folding, and function so that the resulting cells cannot metabolically escape biocontainment mechanisms (Mandell et al. 2015). They observed undetectable escape levels with double- and triple-enzyme synthetic auxotrophs during 14 days of monitoring. A similar NSAA incorporation approach that instead targeted different essential enzymes (Rovner et al. 2015) also demonstrated that NSAA incorporation could be the superior method for building an intrinsic safeguard into genetically engineered organisms, enabling the application of these in open systems. Both studies reported that synthetic auxotrophs requiring NSAAs impeded HGT and mutagenesis for evolutionary escape from the biocontainment strategy.

Synthetic auxotrophy was also generated by incorporating 3-iodo-l-tyrosine into an antidote protein against a toxin, colicin E3 (Kato 2015). Upon the removal of 3-iodo-l-tyrosine, decay of the antidote thus activated colicin E3, which killed the host cells with an escaper frequency of 1.4 mutations per 105 cell divisions. This study demonstrated that the toxin-antidote approach with NSAA incorporation can be used to establish a biocontainment system by only plasmid introduction without genome editing.

Biomaterials

The Swartz group was the first to demonstrate the feasibility of making polymers composed of functional proteins covalently bonded to each other using NSAAs as linkers (Albayrak and Swartz 2014). Multiple copies of the NSAAs p-azido-L-phenylalanine and p-propargyloxy-l-phenylalanine were site-specifically incorporated into sfGFP by CFPS, and the direct polymerization of sfGFP was achieved by azide-alkyne cycloaddition between the two NSAA residues. The protein polymers retained more than 63% fluorescence after coupling. This demonstration suggests that functional biopolymer production can be achieved by using simple click chemistry to insert NSAAs into the protein of interest.

The adhesive proteins of mussels exhibit incredible underwater adhesion capabilities that have been attracted significant attention due to their potential for application in the medical and industrial fields (Kord Forooshani and Lee 2017). Recently, the Budisa group demonstrated the production of 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA)-rich adhesive proteins via genetic code expansion by using computational design and genetic selection methods (Hauf et al. 2017). The study authors engineered aaRSs to enhance the incorporation of the photocaged NSAA ortho-nitrobenzyl DOPA. The NSAA was incorporated in vivo using a 5 site-specific strategy that elevated the spatiotemporal and tunable adhesion properties (ONB cleavage and generation of catechol moiety necessary for adhesive properties) when triggered by exposure to UV light. This strategy provides a direct means of producing recombinant DOPA‐based wet bioadhesives without post-translational modification.

In addition, the repertoire of NSAAs can be applied to improve fluorescent proteins that suffer from lower fluorescence quantum yield and inferior photo-stability (Wang et al. 2003). The presence of an aromatic amino acid at the chromophore triads of fluorescent proteins is essential. However, only four aromatic residues (histidine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine) are available among the 20 standard amino acids. Therefore, standard amino acid replacement at the chromophore triad to construct GFP variants cannot cover the far-red spectral region (>600 nm) of fluorescence, limiting fluorescent microscopic approaches that require long-wavelength biological markers, e.g., deep tissue imaging (Shcherbakova et al. 2012). The Budisa group introduced aromatic NSAAs in the replacement of tryptophan residues in the chromophore triad by using a selective pressure incorporation approach (Baumann et al. 2018). An electron-donating 4-aminotryptophan incorporation resulted in a strong red-shift of the emission wavelength that was thermodynamically more stable than its predecessor. The NSAA approach enables the development of a tailored spectral diversity of fluorescent proteins that can be used in in vivo imaging of various biological samples.

Antimicrobial peptides

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small oligopeptides (5 to 100 amino acids) (Bahar and Ren 2013) produced by living organisms for innate immune responses (Peters et al. 2010). AMPs exhibit broad antimicrobial activity to microbes including viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and fungi (Giuliani et al. 2007). NSAA incorporation could be used to achieve chemical diversification of recombinant AMPs by improving their pH, protease resistance, solubility, oral availability, and half-life (Baumann et al. 2017). Specifically, ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) (Hudson and Mitchell 2018) can be significantly improved by the incorporation of NSAAs that mimic post-translational modification and broaden the chemical space (Baumann et al. 2017). Nisin, perhaps the most thoroughly studied bacteriocin, is a broad spectrum lanthipeptide and a subclass of a large family of RiPPs. The Schultz group incorporated several NSAAs into nisin by expressing the nisA encoding structural peptide, nisB encoding dehydratase, and nisC encoding cyclase with the coexpression of OTS for amber suppression in E. coli and found that α-chloroacetamide-containing NSAA incorporation resulted in recombinant nisin variants with novel macrocyclic topologies (Zambaldo et al. 2017). The Budisa group employed the selection pressure incorporation method to enable the residue-specific incorporation of six proline analogs into the antimicrobial peptide nisin (Nickling et al. 2018). These researchers also produced bioactive nisin variants containing Nε-Boc-L-lysine both in Lactobacillus lactis and E. coli. van der Donk and colleagues produced two analogues of NSAA-containing lantibiotics, lacticin 481 and nisin, using genomically recoded organisms in vivo (Kakkar et al. 2018). In addition, the study authors developed the yeast surface and phage display of lanthipeptides to identify the variants with enhanced biological activities (Hetrick et al. 2018). Therefore, the employment of NSAA incorporation in RiPPs engineering can broaden the generation of lantibiotic variants with new biological activities. Along with the use of various algorithms, such as machine learning and evolutionary algorithms, to design effective antimicrobial peptides, the incorporation of NSAAs into AMPs will open a pathway for identifying AMP variants and optimizing improved AMPs (Porto et al. 2017; Yoshida et al. 2018; Lee et al. 2018). It is possible that the same NSAA incorporation approach can be applied to the engineering of large antimicrobial toxins such as colicin and pyocin to produce chimeric antimicrobials (Kageyama et al. 1996) on advanced CFPS platforms (Jin et al. 2018). Novel antimicrobials containing NSAAs may be used to eradicate antibiotic-resistant bacteria which cause an urgent healthcare problem (Banin et al. 2017).

Biocatalysis

Enzyme engineering has been dependent on classical protein engineering techniques and the more advanced directed evolution methods. The incorporation of NSAAs into enzymes can offer new chemical functionalities to improve the various aspects of enzymatic catalysis. Standard protein engineering approaches and unnatural mutagenesis are expected to complement each other to generate efficient biocatalysts that can be used in various applications (Agostini et al. 2017). The Schultz group reported on a catalytically-improved TEM-1 β-lactamase variant following p-acrylamido-phenylalanine incorporation via the replacement of valine-216, which had never been generated with the conventional 20 canonical amino acids. The employment of p-acrylamido-phenylalanine at the 216 position led to conformational changes in key active site residues, lowering the free energy of activation of the substrate (Xiao et al. 2015). The incorporation of the Nδ-methyl histidine ligand into an engineered ascorbate peroxidase resulted in a catalytically higher turnover number compared to the wild type enzyme (Green et al. 2016). In addition, the incorporation of several NSAAs enabled improved activity of Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus lipase (TTL) in organic solvents or other hostile environments necessary for industrial transformations (Acevedo-Rocha et al. 2013). The Schultz group recently reported that the substitution of phenylalanine-22 by p-benzoyl-phenylalanine enhanced the thermal stability of E. coli homoserine O-succinyltransferase (Li et al. 2018). As shown in these examples, the engineering of biocatalysts can be envisioned via expansion of the genetic code, which, in theory, could provide an unlimited set of NSAAs with new chemical functionalities. With the development of more rapid screening processes utilizing high-throughput screening, mutational scanning, and machine learning, NSAA incorporation will allow an unprecedented sequence space for novel biocatalysts (Badenhorst and Bornscheuer 2018).

Industrial applications of NSAAs

Genetic code expansion with NSAAs has emerged in the pharmaceutical industry with great promise in applications ranging from drug discovery and clinical trials to the manufacture of biopharmaceuticals (Kang et al. 2018). Molecular engineering of a protein to introduce the conjugation site at a defined position is very important for biological activity, stability, and pharmacokinetics. Site-selective conjugation such as PEGylation can be achieved by the incorporation of NSAAs. However, protein expression using stop codon reassignment can result in leaky expression and low yields of protein due to low overall suppression efficiency. Efforts such as using cell-free protein synthesis have been made to address limitations otherwise encountered by the specific incorporation of NSAAs (Schinn et al. 2017; Martin et al. 2018).

Several biotech companies are utilizing NSAAs or genetic code expansion to produce therapeutic proteins. Ambrx (La Jolla, CA, USA) is developing NSAA-containing ADCs, αHER2 ADC (ARX788) and PEG-FGF21 (ARX618), which are currently in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials, respectively (Huang and Liu 2018). To incorporate the NSAAs, Ambrx developed a mammalian cell-based production platform called EuCODE™ (Tian et al. 2014). Significant improvements in the mammalian cell expression platform were achieved with a titer up to 1.0 ~ 1.5 g/L of the desired protein in a fed-batch 2,000 L bioreactor (Kang et al. 2018). Abzena (Cambridge, UK) uses site-specific conjugation for the PEGylation of interferon, a naturally occurring cytokine, to maximize the retention of its biological activity (Peciak et al. 2019). Synthorx (La Jolla, CA, USA) is developing Synthorin IL-2 cytokines (THOR-707) to deliver sustained tumor-killing activity without compromising safety liability via protein modification using their proprietary expanded genetic alphabet platform based on an unnatural base pair (Dien et al. 2018). These modified cytokines provide protein therapeutics that can be used to tune receptor pharmacology and extend receptor half-lives.

Along with therapeutic proteins, the pharmacokinetic properties of lanthipeptides undergoing clinical studies were reviewed (Baumann et al. 2017; Ongey et al. 2017; Gomes et al. 2018; Ongey et al. 2018). Rational modifications and incorporation of NSAAs into AMPs may further expand the chemical space and provide new diversified functional characteristics. In collaboration with Intrexon, Oragenics (Florida, USA) has developed a bioengineered and novel lantibiotic called OG716 to treat C. difficile infection (Kers et al. 2018). Novacta Biosystems (Welwyn Garden City, UK) completed a phase I clinical trial of an actagardine lantibiotic derivative NVB302 for C. difficile infection in healthy volunteers (Ongey et al. 2017).

Conclusion

NSAA incorporation is becoming more attractive for a range of biotechnology uses following recent developments of the platform technology. Molecular imaging, protein interactions, biocontainment, biomaterials, therapeutic proteins, and biocatalysts with novel functional and structural properties are available via NSAA incorporation. We speculate that the biological synthesis of modified proteins containing NSAAs will be economically feasible for large-scale production, thereby circumventing biological barriers in the production of novel materials in living systems. Continued effort in the development of new methodologies that combine OTS optimization, biological platform improvement, and high-throughput screening/selection methods is necessary to advance the efficiency and fidelity of NSAA incorporation techniques. More applications will emerge as the field grows.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (R15AI130988).

Footnotes

Ethical approval This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acevedo-Rocha CG, Hoesl MG, Nehring S, Royter M, Wolschner C, Wiltschi B, Antranikian G, Budisa N (2013) Non-canonical amino acids as a useful synthetic biological tool for lipase-catalysed reactions in hostile environments. Catal Sci Technol 3:1198–1201 . doi: 10.1039/c3cy20712a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agostini F, Völler J-S, Koksch B, Acevedo-Rocha CG, Kubyshkin V, Budisa N (2017) Biocatalysis with unnatural amino acids: enzymology meets xenobiology. Angew Chemie Int Ed 56:9680–9703 . doi: 10.1002/anie.201610129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albayrak C, Swartz JR (2014) Direct polymerization of proteins. ACS Synth Biol 3:353–362 . doi: 10.1021/sb400116x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albayrak C, Swartz JR (2013) Cell-free co-production of an orthogonal transfer RNA activates efficient site-specific non-natural amino acid incorporation. Nucleic Acids Res 41:5949–5963 . doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aminov RI (2011) Horizontal gene exchange in environmental microbiota. Front Microbiol 2:158 . doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amiram M, Haimovich AD, Fan C, Wang Y-S, Aerni H-R, Ntai I, Moonan DW, Ma NJ, Rovner AJ, Hong SH, Kelleher NL, Goodman AL, Jewett MC, Söll D, Rinehart J, Isaacs FJ (2015) Evolution of translation machinery in recoded bacteria enables multi-site incorporation of nonstandard amino acids. Nat Biotechnol 33:1272–1279 . doi: 10.1038/nbt.3372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ayyadurai N, Saravanan Prabhu N, Deepankumar K, Lee S-G, Jeong H-H, Lee C-S, Yun H (2011) Development of a selective, sensitive, and reversible biosensor by the genetic incorporation of a metal-binding site into green fluorescent protein. Angew Chemie Int Ed 50:6534–6537 . doi: 10.1002/anie.201008289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Badenhorst CPS, Bornscheuer UT (2018) Getting momentum: from biocatalysis to advanced synthetic biology. Trends Biochem Sci 43:180–198 . doi: 10.1016/J.TIBS.2018.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bahar AA, Ren D (2013) Antimicrobial peptides. Pharmaceuticals 6:1543–1575 . doi: 10.3390/ph6121543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Banin E, Hughes D, Kuipers OP (2017) Editorial: bacterial pathogens, antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:450–452 . doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baumann T, Nickling JH, Bartholomae M, Buivydas A, Kuipers OP, Budisa N (2017) Prospects of in vivo incorporation of non-canonical amino acids for the chemical diversification of antimicrobial peptides. Front Microbiol 8:124 . doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Baumann T, Schmitt F-J, Pelzer A, Spiering VJ, Freiherr Von Sass GJ, Friedrich T, Budisa N, Baumann C:, Schmitt T, Spiering A, Von Sass F, Friedrich GJ (2018) Engineering “golden” fluorescence by selective pressure incorporation of non-canonical amino acids and protein analysis by mass spectrometry and fluorescence. J Vis Exp 134:57017 . doi: 10.3791/57017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bryson D, Fan C, Guo L, Miller C, Söll D, Liu D (2017) Continuous directed evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Nat Chem Biol 13:1253–1260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS (2005) Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 23:102–107 . doi: 10.1038/nbt1044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chatterjee A, Sun SB, Furman JL, Xiao H, Schultz PG (2013) A versatile platform for single- and multiple-unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 52:1828–1837 . doi: 10.1021/bi4000244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chatterjee A, Xiao H, Schultz PG (2012) Evolution of multiple, mutually orthogonal prolyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:14841–14846 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212454109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen Z, Ren W, Wright QE, Ai H (2013) Genetically encoded fluorescent probe for the selective detection of peroxynitrite. J Am Chem Soc 135:14940–14943 . doi: 10.1021/ja408011q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chin JW (2017) Expanding and reprogramming the genetic code. Nature 550:53–60 . doi: 10.1038/nature24031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chin JW (2014) Expanding and reprogramming the genetic code of cells and animals. Annu Rev Biochem 83:379–408 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. d’Aquino AE, Kim DS, Jewett MC (2018) Engineered ribosomes for basic science and synthetic biology. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 9:311–340 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060817-084129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Devaraj NK (2018) The future of bioorthogonal chemistry. ACS Cent Sci 4:952–959 . doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dien VT, Morris SE, Karadeema RJ, Romesberg FE (2018) Expansion of the genetic code via expansion of the genetic alphabet. Curr Opin Chem Biol 46:196–202 . doi: 10.1016/J.CBPA.2018.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dulic M, Cvetesic N, Zivkovic I, Palencia A, Cusack S, Bertosa B, Gruic-Sovulj I (2018) Kinetic origin of substrate specificity in post-transfer editing by leucyl-tRNA synthetase. J Mol Biol 430:1–16 . doi: 10.1016/J.JMB.2017.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dumas A, Lercher L, Spicer CD, Davis BG (2015) Designing logical codon reassignment – expanding the chemistry in biology. Chem Sci 6:50–69 . doi: 10.1039/C4SC01534G [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fechter P, Rudinger J, Giegé R, Théobald-Dietrich A (1998) Ribozyme processed tRNA transcripts with unfriendly internal promoter for T7 RNA polymerase: production and activity. FEBS Lett 436:99–103 . doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01096-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Forster AC, Tan Z, Nalam MNL, Lin H, Qu H, Cornish VW, Blacklow SC (2003) Programming peptidomimetic syntheses by translating genetic codes designed de novo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:6353–6357 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1132122100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gan F, Liu R, Wang F, Schultz PG (2018) Functional replacement of histidine in proteins to generate noncanonical amino acid dependent organisms. J Am Chem Soc 140:3829–3832 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gan R, Perez JG, Carlson ED, Ntai I, Isaacs FJ, Kelleher NL, Jewett MC (2017) Translation system engineering in Escherichia coli enhances non-canonical amino acid incorporation into proteins. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:1074–1086 . doi: 10.1002/bit.26239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gerrits M, Budisa N, Merk H (2019) Site-specific chemoselective pyrrolysine analogues incorporation using the cell-free protein synthesis system. ACS Synth Biol online . doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Giuliani A, Pirri G, Nicoletto S (2007) Antimicrobial peptides: an overview of a promising class of therapeutics. Cent Eur J Biol 2:1–33 . doi: 10.2478/s11535-007-0010-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gomes B, Augusto MT, Felício MR, Hollmann A, Franco OL, Gonçalves S, Santos NC (2018) Designing improved active peptides for therapeutic approaches against infectious diseases. Biotechnol Adv 36:415–429 . doi: 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2018.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Green AP, Hayashi T, Mittl PRE, Hilvert D (2016) A chemically programmed proximal ligand enhances the catalytic properties of a heme enzyme. J Am Chem Soc 138:11344–11352 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b07029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hauf M, Richter F, Schneider T, Faidt T, Martins BM, Baumann T, Durkin P, Dobbek H, Jacobs K, Möglich A, Budisa N (2017) Photoactivatable mussel-based underwater adhesive proteins by an expanded genetic code. ChemBioChem 18:1819–1823 . doi: 10.1002/cbic.201700327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hetrick KJ, Walker MC, Van Der Donk WA (2018) Development and application of yeast and phage display of diverse lanthipeptides. ACS Cent Sci 4:458–467 . doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoesl MG, Oehm S, Durkin P, Darmon E, Peil L, Aerni H-R, Rappsilber J, Rinehart J, Leach D, Söll D, Budisa N (2015) Chemical evolution of a bacterial proteome. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:10030–10034 . doi: 10.1002/anie.201502868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hong SH, Kwon Y-C, Jewett MC (2014a) Non-standard amino acid incorporation into proteins using Escherichia coli cell-free protein synthesis. Front Chem 2:34 . doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hong SH, Kwon Y-C, Martin RW, Des Soye BJ, de Paz AM, Swonger KN, Ntai I, Kelleher NL, Jewett MC (2015) Improving cell-free protein synthesis through genome engineering of Escherichia coli lacking release factor 1. ChemBioChem 16:844–853 . doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hong SH, Ntai I, Haimovich AD, Kelleher NL, Isaacs FJ, Jewett MC (2014b) Cell-free protein synthesis from a release factor 1 deficient Escherichia coli activates efficient and multiple site-specific non-standard amino acid incorporation. ACS Synth Biol 3:398–409 . doi: 10.1021/sb400140t [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang Y, Liu T (2018) Therapeutic applications of genetic code expansion. Synth Syst Biotechnol 3:150–158 . doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2018.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hudson GA, Mitchell DA (2018) RiPP antibiotics: biosynthesis and engineering potential. Curr Opin Microbiol 45:61–69 . doi: 10.1016/J.MIB.2018.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Imai S, Guarente L (2014) NAD+ and sirtuins in aging and disease. Trends Cell Biol 24:464–471 . doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Iwane Y, Hitomi A, Murakami H, Katoh T, Goto Y, Suga H (2016) Expanding the amino acid repertoire of ribosomal polypeptide synthesis via the artificial division of codon boxes. Nat Chem 8:317–325 . doi: 10.1038/nchem.2446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jin X, Hong SH (2018) Cell-free protein synthesis for producing ‘difficult-to-express’ proteins. Biochem Eng J 138:156–164 . doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.07.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jin X, Kightlinger W, Kwon Y-C, Hong SH (2018) Rapid production and characterization of antimicrobial colicins using Escherichia coli-based cell-free protein synthesis. Synth Biol 3:ysy004 . doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysy004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Johnson DBF, Xu J, Shen Z, Takimoto JK, Schultz MD, Schmitz RJ, Xiang Z, Ecker JR, Briggs SP, Wang L (2011) RF1 knockout allows ribosomal incorporation of unnatural amino acids at multiple sites. Nat Chem Biol 7:779–786 . doi: 10.1038/nchembio.657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kageyama M, Kobayashi M, Sano Y, Masaki H (1996) Construction and characterization of pyocin-colicin chimeric proteins. J Bacteriol 178:103–110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kakkar N, Perez JG, Liu WR, Jewett MC, van der Donk WA (2018) Incorporation of nonproteinogenic amino acids in class I and II lantibiotics. ACS Chem Biol 13:951–957 . doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b01024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kang M, Lu Y, Chen S, Tian F (2018) Harnessing the power of an expanded genetic code toward next-generation biopharmaceuticals. Curr Opin Chem Biol 46:123–129 . doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kato Y (2015) An engineered bacterium auxotrophic for an unnatural amino acid: a novel biological containment system. PeerJ 3:e1247 . doi: 10.7717/peerj.1247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Katoh T, Passioura T, Suga H (2018) Advances in in vitro genetic code reprogramming in 2014–2017. Synth Biol 3:ysy008 . doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysy008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kers JA, DeFusco AW, Park JH, Xu J, Pulse ME, Weiss WJ, Handfield M (2018) OG716: Designing a fit-for-purpose lantibiotic for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections. PLoS One 13:e0197467 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Keseler IM, Mackie A, Santos-Zavaleta A, Billington R, Bonavides-Martínez C, Caspi R, Fulcher C, Gama-Castro S, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Muñiz-Rascado L, Ong Q, Paley S, Peralta-Gil M, Subhraveti P, Velázquez-Ramírez DA, Weaver D, Collado-Vides J, Paulsen I, Karp PD (2017) The EcoCyc database: reflecting new knowledge about Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D543–D550 . doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kim CH, Axup JY, Schultz PG (2013) Protein conjugation with genetically encoded unnatural amino acids. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17:412–419 . doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Koh M, Nasertorabi F, Han GW, Stevens RC, Schultz PG (2017) Generation of an orthogonal protein–protein interface with a noncanonical amino acid. J Am Chem Soc 139:5728–5731 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kord Forooshani P, Lee BP (2017) Recent approaches in designing bioadhesive materials inspired by mussel adhesive protein. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 55:9–33 . doi: 10.1002/pola.28368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Krishnakumar R, Ling J (2014) Experimental challenges of sense codon reassignment: an innovative approach to genetic code expansion. FEBS Lett 588:383–388 . doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kubyshkin V, Acevedo-Rocha CG, Budisa N (2018) On universal coding events in protein biogenesis. Biosystems 164:16–25 . doi: 10.1016/J.BIOSYSTEMS.2017.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kubyshkin V, Budisa N (2017) Synthetic alienation of microbial organisms by using genetic code engineering: why and how? Biotechnol J 12:1600097 . doi: 10.1002/biot.201600097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lajoie MJ, Rovner AJ, Goodman DB, Aerni H-R, Haimovich AD, Kuznetsov G, Mercer JA, Wang HH, Carr PA, Mosberg JA, Rohland N, Schultz PG, Jacobson JM, Rinehart J, Church GM, Isaacs FJ (2013) Genomically recoded organisms expand biological functions. Science 342:357–360 . doi: 10.1126/science.1241459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lee EY, Wong GCL, Ferguson AL (2018) Machine learning-enabled discovery and design of membrane-active peptides. Bioorg Med Chem 26:2708–2718 . doi: 10.1016/J.BMC.2017.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Li JC, Liu T, Wang Y, Mehta AP, Schultz PG (2018) Enhancing protein stability with genetically encoded noncanonical amino acids. J Am Chem Soc 140:15997–16000 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Li X, Liu CC (2014) Biological applications of expanded genetic codes. ChemBioChem 15:2335–2341 . doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Link AJ, Tirrell DA (2005) Reassignment of sense codons in vivo. Methods 36:291–298 . doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu CC, Schultz PG (2010) Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu Rev Biochem 79:413–444 . doi: doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.105824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu X, Jiang L, Li J, Wang L, Yu Y, Zhou Q, Lv X, Gong W, Lu Y, Wang J (2014) Significant expansion of fluorescent protein sensing ability through the genetic incorporation of superior photo-induced electron-transfer quenchers. J Am Chem Soc 136:13094–13097 . doi: 10.1021/ja505219r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mandell DJ, Lajoie MJ, Mee MT, Takeuchi R, Kuznetsov G, Norville JE, Gregg CJ, Stoddard BL, Church GM (2015) Biocontainment of genetically modified organisms by synthetic protein design. Nature 518:55–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Martin RW, Soye BJ Des, Kwon Y-C, Kay J, Davis RG, Thomas PM, Majewska NI, Chen CX, Marcum RD, Weiss MG, Stoddart AE, Amiram M, Charna AKR, Patel JR, Isaacs FJ, Kelleher NL, Hong SH, Jewett MC (2018) Cell-free protein synthesis from genomically recoded bacteria enables multisite incorporation of noncanonical amino acids. Nat Commun 9:1203 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03469-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Moe-Behrens GHG, Davis R, Haynes KA (2013) Preparing synthetic biology for the world. Front Microbiol 4:5 . doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mukai T, Yanagisawa T, Ohtake K, Wakamori M, Adachi J, Hino N, Sato A, Kobayashi T, Hayashi A, Shirouzu M, Umehara T, Yokoyama S, Sakamoto K (2011) Genetic-code evolution for protein synthesis with non-natural amino acids. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 411:757–761 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Neumann-Staubitz P, Neumann H (2016) The use of unnatural amino acids to study and engineer protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 38:119–128 . doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Neumann H, Wang K, Davis L, Garcia-Alai M, Chin JW (2010) Encoding multiple unnatural amino acids via evolution of a quadruplet-decoding ribosome. Nature 464:441–444 . doi: 10.1038/nature08817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nguyen T-A, Cigler M, Lang K (2018) Expanding the genetic code to study protein-protein interactions. Angew Chemie Int Ed 57:14350–14361 . doi: 10.1002/anie.201805869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nickling JH, Baumann T, Schmitt F-J, Bartholomae M, Kuipers OP, Friedrich T, Budisa N (2018) Antimicrobial peptides produced by selective pressure incorporation of non-canonical amino acids. J Vis Exp 135:e57551 . doi: 10.3791/57551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Noren CJ, Anthony-Cahill SJ, Griffith MC, Schultz PG (1989) A general method for site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins. Science 244:182–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. O’Donoghue P, Ling J, Wang Y-S, Söll D (2013) Upgrading protein synthesis for synthetic biology. Nat Chem Biol 9:594–598 . doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ohtake K, Sato A, Mukai T, Hino N, Yokoyama S, Sakamoto K (2012) Efficient decoding of the UAG triplet as a full-fledged sense codon enhances the growth of a prfA-deficient strain of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 194:2606–2613 . doi: 10.1128/jb.00195-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ohtsuki T, Manabe T, Sisido M (2005) Multiple incorporation of non-natural amino acids into a single protein using tRNAs with non-standard structures. FEBS Lett 579:6769–6774 . doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ongey EL, Pflugmacher S, Neubauer P (2018) Bioinspired designs, molecular premise and tools for evaluating the ecological importance of antimicrobial peptides. Pharmaceuticals 11:68 . doi: 10.3390/ph11030068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ongey EL, Yassi H, Pflugmacher S, Neubauer P (2017) Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of lanthipeptides undergoing clinical studies. Biotechnol Lett 39:473–482 . doi: 10.1007/s10529-016-2279-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Orelle C, Carlson ED, Szal T, Florin T, Jewett MC, Mankin AS (2015) Protein synthesis by ribosomes with tethered subunits. Nature 524:119–124 . doi: 10.1038/nature14862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Park H-S, Hohn MJ, Umehara T, Guo L-T, Osborne EM, Benner J, Noren CJ, Rinehart J, Söll D (2011) Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli with phosphoserine. Science 333:1151–1154 . doi: 10.1126/science.1207203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Peciak K, Laurine E, Tommasi R, Choi J, Brocchini S (2019) Site-selective protein conjugation at histidine. Chem Sci 10:427–439 . doi: 10.1039/C8SC03355B [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Peters BM, Shirtliff ME, Jabra-Rizk MA (2010) Antimicrobial peptides: primeval molecules or future drugs? PLoS Pathog 6:e1001067 . doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Porto WF, Pires AS, Franco OL (2017) Computational tools for exploring sequence databases as a resource for antimicrobial peptides. Biotechnol Adv 35:337–349 . doi: 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2017.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Praveschotinunt P, Courchesne NMD, den Hartog I, Lu C, Kim JJ, Nguyen PQ, Joshi NS (2018) Tracking of engineered bacteria in vivo using nonstandard amino acid incorporation. ACS Synth Biol 7:1640–1650 . doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Quast RB, Mrusek D, Hoffmeister C, Sonnabend A, Kubick S (2015) Cotranslational incorporation of non-standard amino acids using cell-free protein synthesis. FEBS Lett 589:1703–1712 . doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.04.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ravikumar Y, Nadarajan SP, Yoo TH, Lee C, Yun H (2015) Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis-based enzyme engineering. Trends Biotechnol 33:462–470 . doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Reitz C, Fan Q, Neubauer P (2018) Synthesis of non-canonical branched-chain amino acids in Escherichia coli and approaches to avoid their incorporation into recombinant proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol 53:248–253 . doi: 10.1016/J.COPBIO.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Rovner AJ, Haimovich AD, Katz SR, Li Z, Grome MW, Gassaway BM, Amiram M, Patel JR, Gallagher RR, Rinehart J, Isaacs FJ (2015) Recoded organisms engineered to depend on synthetic amino acids. Nature 518:89–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Schinn S-M, Bradley W, Groesbeck A, Wu JC, Broadbent A, Bundy BC (2017) Rapid in vitro screening for the location-dependent effects of unnatural amino acids on protein expression and activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:2412–2417 . doi: 10.1002/bit.26305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Serfling R, Seidel L, Böttke T, Coin I (2018) Optimizing the genetic incorporation of chemical probes into GPCRs for photo-crosslinking mapping and bioorthogonal chemistry in live mammalian cells. J Vis Exp 134:e57069 . doi: 10.3791/57069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shang X, Chen Y, Wang N, Niu W, Guo J (2018) Oxidation-induced generation of a mild electrophile for proximity-enhanced protein–protein crosslinking. Chem Commun 54:4172–4175 . doi: 10.1039/C8CC01639A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Shcherbakova DM, Subach OM, Verkhusha VV. (2012) Red fluorescent proteins: advanced imaging applications and future design. Angew Chemie Int Ed 51:10724–10738 . doi: 10.1002/anie.201200408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Shreiner AB, Kao JY, Young VB (2015) The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 31:69–75 . doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Smith MT, Hawes AK, Shrestha P, Rainsdon JM, Wu JC, Bundy BC (2014) Alternative fermentation conditions for improved Escherichia coli-based cell-free protein synthesis for proteins requiring supplemental components for proper synthesis. Process Biochem 49:217–222 . doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.10.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Spicer CD, Jumeaux C, Gupta B, Stevens MM (2018) Peptide and protein nanoparticle conjugates: versatile platforms for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 47:3574–3620 . doi: 10.1039/C7CS00877E [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Swartz JR, Jewett MC, Woodrow K a (2004) Cell-free protein synthesis with prokaryotic combined transcription-translation. Methods Mol Biol 267:169–182 . doi: 10.1385/1-59259-774-2:169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tian F, Lu Y, Manibusan A, Sellers A, Tran H, Sun Y, Phuong T, Barnett R, Hehli B, Song F, DeGuzman MJ, Ensari S, Pinkstaff JK, Sullivan LM, Biroc SL, Cho H, Schultz PG, DiJoseph J, Dougher M, Ma D, Dushin R, Leal M, Tchistiakova L, Feyfant E, Gerber H-P, Sapra P (2014) A general approach to site-specific antibody drug conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:1766–1771 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321237111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Uhlenbeck OC, Schrader JM (2018) Evolutionary tuning impacts the design of bacterial tRNAs for the incorporation of unnatural amino acids by ribosomes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 46:138–145 . doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Vargas-Rodriguez O, Sevostyanova A, Söll D, Crnković A (2018) Upgrading aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for genetic code expansion. Curr Opin Chem Biol 46:115–122 . doi: 10.1016/J.CBPA.2018.07.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Voloshchuk N, Montclare JK (2010) Incorporation of unnatural amino acids for synthetic biology. Mol Biosyst 6:65–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang K, Neumann H, Peak-Chew SY, Chin JW (2007) Evolved orthogonal ribosomes enhance the efficiency of synthetic genetic code expansion. Nat Biotechnol 25:770–777 . doi: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v25/n7/suppinfo/nbt1314_S1.html [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang L (2017a) Engineering the genetic code in cells and animals:biological considerations and impacts. Acc Chem Res 50:2767–2775 . doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1800-4.Alcohol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wang L (2017b) Genetically encoding new bioreactivity. N Biotechnol 38:16–25 . doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wang L, Xie J, Deniz AA, Schultz PG (2003) Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis of green fluorescent protein. J Org Chem 68:174–176 . doi: 10.1021/JO026570U [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wang N, Yang B, Fu C, Zhu H, Zheng F, Kobayashi T, Liu J, Li S, Ma C, Wang PG, Wang Q, Wang L (2018) Genetically encoding fluorosulfate-L-tyrosine to react with lysine, histidine, and tyrosine via SuFEx in proteins in vivo. J Am Chem Soc 140:4995–4999 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Xiao H, Nasertorabi F, Choi S, Han GW, Reed SA, Stevens RC, Schultz PG (2015) Exploring the potential impact of an expanded genetic code on protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6961–6966 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507741112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Xuan W, Yao A, Schultz PG (2017) Genetically encoded fluorescent probe for detecting sirtuins in living cells. J Am Chem Soc 139:12350–12353 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Yang B, Tang S, Ma C, Li S-T, Shao G-C, Dang B, DeGrado WF, Dong M-Q, Wang PG, Ding S, Wang L (2017) Spontaneous and specific chemical cross-linking in live cells to capture and identify protein interactions. Nat Commun 8:2240 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02409-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Yang B, Wu H, Schnier PD, Liu Y, Liu J, Wang N, DeGrado WF, Wang L (2018) Proximity-enhanced SuFEx chemical cross-linker for specific and multitargeting cross-linking mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:11162–11167 . doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1813574115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Yoshida M, Hinkley T, Tsuda S, Abul-Haija YM, McBurney RT, Kulikov V, Mathieson JS, Galiñanes Reyes S, Castro MD, Cronin L (2018) Using evolutionary algorithms and machine learning to explore sequence space for the discovery of antimicrobial peptides. Chem 4:533–543 . doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMPR.2018.01.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Young TS, Ahmad I, Yin JA, Schultz PG (2010) An enhanced system for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in E. coli. J Mol Biol 395:361–374 . doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Young TS, Schultz PG (2010) Beyond the canonical 20 amino acids: expanding the genetic lexicon. J Biol Chem 285:11039–11044 . doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.091306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zambaldo C, Luo X, Mehta AP, Schultz PG (2017) Recombinant macrocyclic lanthipeptides incorporating non-canonical amino acids. J Am Chem Soc 139:11646–11649 . doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhang Y, Ptacin JL, Fischer EC, Aerni HR, Caffaro CE, San Jose K, Feldman AW, Turner CR, Romesberg FE (2017) A semi-synthetic organism that stores and retrieves increased genetic information. Nature 551:644–647 . doi: 10.1038/nature24659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Zheng Y, Gilgenast MJ, Hauc S, Chatterjee A (2018) Capturing post-translational modification-triggered protein–protein interactions using dual noncanonical amino acid mutagenesis. ACS Chem Biol 13:1137–1141 . doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES