Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2019 Apr 4;9(5):164. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1698-4

Diversity of fungi from mangrove sediments of Goa, India, obtained by metagenomic analysis using Illumina sequencing

Shyamalina Haldar 1,, Sarita W Nazareth 1
PMCID: PMC6449407  PMID: 30997301

Abstract

The fungal composition, abundance and diversity of the mangrove sediments from the Mandovi and Zuari estuaries, Goa, using paired-end Illumina sequencing, hitherto unexplored by a metagenomic approach, indicated that though the types of fungal phyla were similar between the two sediments, the abundance of the species was significantly different between them (p value < 0.005). Basidiomycota and Ascomycota were the two major phyla which were sub-divided into eighteen classes, families, orders, genera and species and one unassigned group in both the sediments. The top five classes observed were Agaricomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Dothideomycetes and Eurotiomycetes from both the sediments. The diversity analysis based on the observed fungal species richness (Chao 1 for Mandovi were 614 and 714.7 while for Zuari were 665 and 771.2) revealed that Zuari sediment was taxonomically rich, indicating these to be potent candidates for bioremediation and a rich repository for biotechnologically important fungi. This is a first report on diversity of fungi from mangrove sediments of Goa using metagenomic studies.

Keywords: Fungal diversity, Goa, Illumina, Mangrove, Metagenomic

Genome reports

The mangrove ecosystem that covers a quarter of the world’s tropical coastlines is a major driver for transferring organic matter from land to oceans and is a niche for wide spectrum of microbial diversity (Simoes et al. 2015). Yet it is one of the most threatened ecosystems. Therefore, researchers have comprehensively studied their microbial composition and activities with a view to protect, restore and better understand this ecosystem functioning. However, studies have generally focused on bacterial diversity, and very few studies have investigated the fungal communities from this ecosystem (Simoes et al. 2015). But fungi form an important member of the microbial consortia in mangrove sediments that not only take part in biogeochemical cycling but are also important producers of commercially important enzymes (Simoes et al. 2015). In addition, arbuscular mycorrhizae (phylum Glomeromycota) form symbiotic relationships with over 80% of vascular plants including mangroves (French 2017). In return for carbon, these fungi improve plant health and tolerance to environmental stress (French 2017). Till date, examination of fungal diversity and activities from mangroves of Goa relied on culture-based studies on individual and/or specific groups of fungi (Verma et al. 2010; Nazareth et al. 2011, 2012; Dastager et al. 2012; Devi et al. 2012; Nayak et al. 2012; Bicholkar and Nazareth 2015). However, in the modern era of scientific advancements, ‘omic’ technologies are emerging as potential tools to ensure holistic insight into environmental systems, thereby leading to in-depth understanding of the complex mechanisms in an ecosystem (Sharma and Lal 2017). It forms a radical tool that helps to detect microbes and to decipher their full biological activities within the environmental niche which otherwise would have remained unnoticed due to our inability of mimicking their growth conditions under laboratory set-ups. There are very few reports on diversity analysis of fungi from mangroves around the world using metagenomic approach (Thompson et al. 2013; Simoes et al. 2015) and most of these studies targeted the analysis of specific fungal genes related to synthesis of various biotechnologically important enzymes (Peng et al. 2012; Thompson et al. 2013). However, metagenomic sequencing of native soil communities from mangroves, suggests that they support a variety of mycorrhizal species with potential agricultural, medical and biotechnological applications (French 2017). Moreover, although metagenomic study has been undertaken to study bacterial diversity of mangroves in Goa, using pyrosequencing (Fernandes et al. 2014) and a more in-depth process of Illumina sequencing (Haldar and Nazareth 2018), this study forms a first report on fungal diversity from mangrove ecosystem of Goa using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The limitation for metagenomic analysis of fungal communities might be due to the difficulty in isolation of the fungal DNA from sediments and hence an integrated lysis procedure is required to obtain sufficient amount of fungal DNA (Jiang et al. 2011). However, an in-depth phylogenetic analysis of fungal community from the mangrove sediments can be beneficial for developing a better perception on the ecological role of fungi in the mangrove ecosystem.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the overall fungal composition, abundance and diversity in the mangrove sediments of Mandovi and Zuari estuaries of Goa using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing on Illumina MiSeq platform, a method that is significantly reliable in its efficiency to discriminate between similar soil samples in comparison to other next-generation sequencing technologies (Habtom et al. 2017).

The investigations of this study were carried out on samples obtained from mangrove forests of Ribandar (15.4993°N and 73.8684°E) and Cortalim (15.4058°N and 73.9286°E) along Mandovi (M) and Zuari (Z) estuaries, respectively, during May 2017. Avicennia officinalis and Avicennia alba are the two true mangrove species reported from these two places constituting 80% and 40% of the total mangrove vegetation in Ribandar and Cortalim, respectively; Sonneratia alba (15%) and Acanthus ilicifolius (5%) are also found at Ribandar mangroves, while Cortalim mangroves are also rich in Avicennia officinalis and Avicennia alba, Acanthus ilicifolius, Aegiceras corniculatum and Excoecaria agallocha (http://www.forest.goa.gov.in/mgr/ accessed on 16th March, 2019). A total of six cores of sediment samples from the intertidal zone, three cores from each site, were collected from a depth of 2 cm. The sediment cores were collected using a soil-hole borer from at a depth of 2 cm, transferred to sterile plastic containers with the help of sterile spatula, and were taken to the laboratories for analysis within 1 h of collection. The samples were stored at − 20 °C before being sent for NGS analyses to Xcelris laboratories, Ahmedabad. The procedure involved preparation of ITS2-amplicon libraries using Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina Inc) with the adaptor-ligated primers (forward: GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC and reverse: TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC). The kit is notably successful in rapid library preparation from low-input DNA (1 ng) where DNA is simultaneously fragmented and tagged with sequencing adapters in a single-tube enzymatic reaction. After obtaining the Qubit concentration for the library and the mean peak size from Bioanalyzer profile, the library was loaded onto Illumina MiSeq platform at appropriate concentration (10–20 pM) for cluster generation and sequencing. The Illumina reads obtained from MiSeq platform were stitched using FLASH assembler; filtered using usearch61 algorithm and then taxonomically classified at 97% sequence similarity using UCLUST algorithm (Edgar 2010). The metagenomic sequences were deposited at Sequence Read Archive (SRA of National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI) to obtain accession numbers (Table 1).

Table 1.

“Minimal information about metagenomic sequence” (MiMS) for the NGS sequence data submitted to SRA database of GenBank in NCBI for Mandovi and Zuari mangrove sediment

Structured comment name Mandovi mangrove sediment (A) Zuari mangrove sediment (B)
Submitted_to_insdc Sequence Read Archive (SRA); accession number: SRX3203327 Sequence Read Archive (SRA); accession number: SRX3203326
Investigation_type Diversity of fungus in Mandovi mangrove sediment, Goa Diversity of fungus in Zuari mangrove sediment, Goa
Project_name Application of metagenomic technique for isolation of microbes from mangroves for potential use in biofertilization and bioremediation Application of metagenomic technique for isolation of microbes from mangroves for potential use in biofertilization and bioremediation
Lat_lon 15.4993°N and 73.8684°E 15.4058°N and 73.9286°E
Geo_loc_name Mandovi mangrove estuary, Goa Zuari mangrove estuary, Goa
Collection_date 2016-04-01T:10:30:10 2016-04-02T:11:45:10
Biome Mangrove Mangrove
Feature Coastal Coastal
Material Sediment Sediment
Seq_meth Illumina MiSeq Illumina MiSeq

A total of 1,869,222 and 1,646,924 paired-sequence reads were obtained for A and B which were stitched to produce 716,293 and 724,591 reads. After removal of chimeric sequences, 1,155,904 quality-filtered sequences were obtained which were used for operational taxonomic unit (OTU) generation. Representative set of OTUs consisting of 4140 sequences was prepared from the obtained OTUs. After the removal of spurious and single sequence containing OTUs, a total of 811 OTUs with no singletons, that is, OTUs with ≥ 2 sequences, were obtained and were used for further analysis.

Basidiomycota followed by Ascomycota were the two major phyla identified in A (80.86% and 7.57%) and B (81.7% and 7.2%). Zygomycota was observed as a minor phylum in both A (2%) and B (3%). Other sequences which could not be resolved taxonomically were grouped under unassigned phyla, the latter constituting 9.64% and 8.1% in A and B, respectively. Our findings corroborate earlier findings on mangrove sediments of Goa and others which showed these phyla as the major identified phyla (Verma et al. 2010; Nazareth et al. 2012; Nogueira-Melo et al. 2014; Bicholkar and Nazareth 2015). It is noteworthy to mention that these groups of fungi, isolated from mangroves of Goa, have been reported to be potent candidates used for bioremediation due to their ability of producing laccase (Verma et al. 2010) and metal sorption and removal from solution (Gazem and Nazareth 2012, 2013 Nazareth et al. 2012; Bicholkar and Nazareth 2015).

In both A and B, the two phyla were sub-divided into eighteen classes, families, orders, genera and species. The rest of the sequences which could not be resolved taxonomically were grouped under unassigned class, class, family, order, genus and species, respectively, in A and B (p value < 0.005).

The top five classes observed were Agaricomycetes (75.48% in A and 76.36% in B; p value < 0.005), Sordariomycetes (2.46% in A and 1.37% in B; p value < 0.005; p value < 0.005), Saccharomycetes (2.37% in A and 2.48% in B; p value < 0.005), Dothideomycetes (2.00% in A and 2.5% in B; p value < 0.005) and Eurotiomycetes (0.53% in A and 0.63% in B) which were sub-divided into Auriculariales (41.81% in A and 42.26% in B; p value < 0.005), Agaricales (33.52% in A and 33.9% in B; p value < 0.005), Saccharomycetales (2.37% in A and 2.48% in B; p value < 0.005), Hypocreales (2.23% in A and 1.32% in B; p value < 0.005) and Pleosporales (1.89% in A and 1.62% in B; p value < 0.005) orders. Finer resolution identified Auriculariaceae (41.8% in A and 42.26% in B; p value < 0.005), Entolomataceae (1.8% in A and 12.45% in B; p value < 0.005); Agaricaceae (11.2% in A and 11.85% in B), Lyophyllaceae (6.4% in A and 5.6% in B; p value < 0.005), Saccharomycetaceae (2.3% in A and 2.40% in B; p value < 0.005) as the topmost families and Auricularia (41% in A and 42.26% in B; p value < 0.005), Clitopilus (11.8% in A and 12.45% in B; p value < 0.005), Agaricus (6.3% in A and 6.5% in B; p value < 0.005), Termitomyces (5.6% in A and 6.4% in B; p value < 0.005), Leucoagaricus (2.4% in A and 2.93% in B; p value < 0.005) genera.

The abundant fungal species observed were Auricularia polytricha (41% in A and 42.26% in B; p value < 0.005), followed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2.30% in both A and B), Echinoderma echinacea (1.1% in A and 0.93% in B; p value < 0.005), Trichoderma asperellum (0.3% in A and 0.23% in B; p value < 0.005). Cochliobolus lunatus (0.01%) and Pichia kudriavzevii (0.08%) were observed as minor species exclusively in A and B. The distribution and abundance of OTU at different taxonomic levels in A and B was plotted using heatmap where each row corresponded to an OTU and each column corresponded to the sample. The higher the relative abundance of an OTU in a sample, the more intense the color at the corresponding position in the heatmap (Fig. 1). These findings are in accordance with findings on other mangrove sediments using metagenomic approach (Simoes et al. 2015).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

OTU table heatmap showing taxonomy assignment for each OTU at 1000 sequences per OTU. The OTU heatmap displays raw OTU counts per sample, where the counts are colored based on the contribution of each OTU to the total OTU count present in that sample (blue: contributes low percentage of OTUs; red: contributes high percentage of OTUs)

The diversity of the samples was studied using α-diversity or within-sample diversity and β-diversity or between-sample diversity using the OTUs. The observed species and Chao1 richness estimators calculated on the basis of abundance of the OTUs were low for A (614 and 714.7) as compared to B (665 and 771.2) indicating the latter to be comparatively rich in fungal species. This was also found to be the case with bacterial diversity determined by metagenomic studies using Illumina sequencing (Haldar and Nazareth 2018). The lower diversity of the mangrove vegetation bordering the Mandovi estuary at the given site coupled with pollution, including metals, as shown by Bicholkar and Nazareth (2015) and anthropogenic activities such as water traffic, could be factors for the decrease in fungal diversity of the Mandovi mangrove sediments as compared to that of Zuari. However, Shannon diversity index, though of high value, was similar between A and B (3.4). Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index of 0.059 indicated that although the two sediments shared common fungal communities, the proportion of the species varied between A and B. The shallow gradient for rank-abundance curves indicates an even distribution of fungal taxa in both the estuarine mangrove sediments (Fig. 2a). The plateauing of the rarefaction curves obtained from both A and B indicated that the generated sequence reads and determined OTUs were sufficient to capture the fungal diversity of these two samples (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Rank-abundance and b rarefaction curves obtained from the Illumina sequence reads for Mandovi (A) and Zuari (B) mangrove sediments

Taken together, the study identified similar composition with regard to phyla in the sediments, but with significant difference in the abundance (p value < 0.005). Basidiomycota and Ascomycota were the two major phyla which were sub-divided into eighteen classes, families, orders, genera and species and one unassigned group in both the sediments. The top five classes observed were Agaricomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Dothideomycetes and Eurotiomycetes. The diversity analysis based on the observed fungal species revealed that Zuari sediment was taxonomically richer. It is noteworthy to mention that these groups of fungi have been reported to be potent candidates used for bioremediation. Hence, this study indicated the mangrove sediments of Goa to be a rich repository for fungi with potential bioremediation abilities. This study is the first report on diversity of fungi, particularly with respect to the given classes of fungi, from mangrove sediments of Goa by a metagenomic approach and using Illumina sequencing.

Accession number(s) The raw data for Mandovi river mangrove sediment sample have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRX3203327 and of Zauri river mangrove sediment under accession number SRX3203326.

Acknowledgements

The research work was funded by National Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme of Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi. The authors thank Goa University, Goa, for providing the necessary infrastructural support for this research work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Shyamalina Haldar, Email: haldarshyamalina@gmail.com.

Sarita W. Nazareth, Email: sarita@unigoa.ac.in

References

  1. Bicholkar AA, Nazareth SW. A comparative study of metal tolerance and sorption capacities of varied fungal genera from metal polluted estuarine environments for potential in metal bioremediation. Kavaka. 2015;44:16–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dastager SG, Qiang ZL, Damare S, Tang SK, Li WJ. Agromyces indicus sp. nov., isolated from mangroves sediment in Chorao Island, Goa, India. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102(2):345–352. doi: 10.1007/s10482-012-9744-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Devi P, Rodrigues C, Naik CG, D’Souza L. Isolation and characterization of antibacterial compound from a mangrove-endophytic fungus, Penicillium chrysogenum MTCC 5108. Indian J Microbiol. 2012;52(4):617–623. doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0277-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernandes SO, Kirchman DL, Michotey VD, Bonin PC, LokaBharathi PA. Bacterial diversity in relatively pristine and anthropogenically-influenced mangrove ecosystems (Goa, India) Braz J Microbiol. 2014;45(4):1161–1171. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822014000400006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. French KE. Engineering mycorrhizal symbioses to alter plant metabolism and improve crop health. Front Microbiol. 2017;8(1403):2017. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gazem MAH, Nazareth S. Isotherm and kinetic models and cell surface analysis for determination of the mechanism of metal sorption by Aspergillus versicolor. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28(7):2521–2530. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1060-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gazem MAH, Nazareth S. Sorption of lead and copper from an aqueous phase system by marine-derived Aspergillus species. Ann Microbiol. 2013;63(2):503–511. doi: 10.1007/s13213-012-0495-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Habtom H, Demanèche S, Dawson L, Azulay C, Matan O, Robe P, Gafny R, Simonet P, Jurkevitch E, Pasternak Z. Soil characterisation by bacterial community analysis for forensic applications: a quantitative comparison of environmental technologies. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;26:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haldar S, Nazareth SW. Taxonomic diversity of bacteria from mangrove sediments of Goa: metagenomic and functional analysis. 3 Biotech. 2018;8(10):436. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1441-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiang YX, Wu JG, Yu KQ, Ai CX, Zou F, Zhou HW. Integrated lysis procedures reduce extraction biases of microbial DNA from mangrove sediment. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111(2):153–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nayak S, Gonsalves V, Nazareth S. Isolation and salt tolerance of halophilic fungi from mangroves and solar salterns in Goa—India. Ind J Geo-Mar Sci. 2012;41:164–172. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nazareth S, Nayak S, Gonsalves V. Occurrence of the halophilic black yeast Hortaea werneckii in brackish waters of mangroves and hypersaline salterns of Goa—India. Kavaka. 2011;39:23–26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nazareth S, Gaitonde S, Marbaniang T. Metal resistance of halotolerant fungi from mangroves and salterns of Goa—India. Kavaka. 2012;40:73–85. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nogueira-Melo GS, Santos PJ, Gibertoni TB. The community structure of macroscopic basidiomycetes (Fungi) in Brazilian mangroves influenced by temporal and spatial variations. Rev Biol Trop. 2014;62(4):1587–1595. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v62i4.12598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peng M, Xie Q, Hu H, Hong K, Todd JD, Johnston AW, Li Y. Phylogenetic diversity of the dddP gene for dimethylsulfoniopropionate-dependent dimethyl sulfide synthesis in mangrove soils. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58(4):523–530. doi: 10.1139/w2012-019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sharma A, Lal R. Survey of (Meta)genomic approaches for understanding microbial community dynamics. Indian J Microbiol. 2017;57(1):23–38. doi: 10.1007/s12088-016-0629-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simoes MF, Antunes A, Ottoni CA, Amini MS, Alam I, Alzubaidy H, Mokhtar NA, Archer JA, Bajic VB. Soil and rhizosphere associated fungi in gray Mangroves (Avicennia marina) from the Red Sea—a metagenomic approach. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13(5):310–320. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson CE, Beys-da-Silva WO, Santi L, Berger M, Vainstein MH, Guima Rães JA, Vasconcelos AT. A potential source for cellulolytic enzyme discovery and environmental aspects revealed through metagenomics of Brazilian mangroves. AMB Exp. 2013;3(1):65. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verma AK, Raghukumar C, Verma P, Shouche YS, Naik CG. Four marine-derived fungi for bioremediation of raw textile mill effluents. Biodegradation. 2010;21(2):217–233. doi: 10.1007/s10532-009-9295-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES