Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2019 Feb 14;47(1):20–30. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2019.1574372

Characterization of Three Species of Sordariomycetes Isolated from Freshwater and Soil Samples in Korea

Seo Hee Lee 1, Hyo Sun Park 1, Thuong T T Nguyen 1, Hyang Burm Lee 1,
PMCID: PMC6450575  PMID: 30988988

Abstract

During a survey of fungal diversity in the class Sordariomycetes, 3 fungal strains, CNUFC-KMHY6-1, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, and CNUFC-GW2S-4 were isolated from soil and freshwater samples, respectively in Korea. The strains were analyzed both morphologically and phylogenetically on the basis of internal transcribed spacer and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit gene sequences. On the basis of their morphology and phylogeny, CNUFC-KMHY6-1, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, and CNUFC-GW2S-4 isolates were identified as Arcopilus aureus, Memnoniella echinata, and Stachybotrys sansevieriae, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, Ar. aureus and M. echinata have not been previously recorded in Korea, and this is the first report of S. sansevieriae from freshwater niche.

Keywords: Arcopilus aureus, Memnoniella echinata, Stachybotrys sansevieriae, Sordariomycetes

1. Introduction

Sordariomycetes is the second largest class of the division Ascomycota, and it is typically characterized by non-lichenized, perithecial (flask-shaped) ascomata and inoperculate unitunicate asci [1–4]. Members of Sordariomycetes are found in different niches including terrestrial and freshwater habitats [5–7]. Some species are pathogens and endophytes of various plants, whereas others cause diseases in arthropods and mammals [3,8,9]. Many species are saprobes involved in decomposition and nutrient cycling [10], and some species are fungicolous [11].

The classification of Sordariomycetes has changed significantly in the past few decades [12–16]. Recently, Maharachchikumbura et al. [3] introduced 3 new subclasses on the basis of the morphology and combined analysis of 28S large subunit rDNA (LSU), 18S small subunit rDNA (SSU), translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (TEF), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) sequence data. Another study by Maharachchikumbura et al. [4] reported that Sordariomycetes has 6 subclasses, Sordariomycetidae, Hypocreomycetidae, Xylariomycetidae, Meliolomycetidae, Diaporthomycetidae, and Lulworthiomycetidae, 32 orders; 105 families; and 1331 genera. However, Hongsanan et al. [17] provided an updated backbone tree for Sordariomycetes on the basis of LSU, SSU, TEF, and RPB2 sequence data. On the basis of the results, a new subclass was introduced, and the class Sordariomycetes was reported to comprise 6 subclasses, Sordariomycetidae, Hypocreomycetidae, Xylariomycetidae, Savoryellomycetidae, Diaporthomycetidae, and Lulworthiomycetidae; 28 orders; and 105 families.

The genus Arcopilus belongs to the class Sordariomycetes, subclass Sordariomycetidae, order Sordariales, and family Chaetomiaceae. The genus Arcopilus was established by Wang et al. [18] with the type species Arcopilus aureus. In 2016, Wang et al. [18] revised the family Chaetomiaceae on the basis of phylogenetic analyses of RPB2, β-tubulin, internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and LSU nrDNA sequences and morphological comparisons. They proposed 5 new genera, namely, Amesia, Arcopilus, Collariella, Dichotomopilus, and Ovatospora, and transferred some species of Chaetomium to the new genera. Species of the genus Arcopilus usually have arcuate ascomatal hairs and often exhibit a colorful colony because of the ascomata and exudates [18]. Currently, the genus Arcopilus is composed of 5 species – Ar. aureus (≡Chaetomium aureum) (Chivers) X. Wei Wang & Samson, Ar. cupreus (≡C. cupreum) (Ames) X. Wei Wang & Samson, Ar. fusiformis (≡C. fusiforme) (Chivers) X. Wei Wang & Samson, Ar. flavigenus (≡C. flavigenum) (van Warmelo) X. Wei Wang & Samson, and Ar. turgidopilosus (≡C. turgidopilosum) (Ames) X. Wei Wang & Samson.

The genera Memnoniella and Stachybotrys belong to the class Sordariomycetes, subclass Hypocreomycetidae, order Hypocreales, and family Stachybotryaceae. These 2 genera have similar morphological characteristics. The only difference between these 2 genera is that Memnoniella species have long and dry chains of conidia, whereas Stachybotrys species have single-celled conidia aggregated in slimy heads [19,20]. Some authors have considered this is insufficient to distinguish between these genera and have suggested that the 2 genera should be combined under the older name of Stachybotrys [21,22]. This is supported by the molecular results based on the ITS phylogenetic analysis of Haugland et al. [23]. However, Lombard et al. [24] performed multi-locus sequence analysis of the family Stachybotriaceae and showed that the Memnoniella species grouped in a well-supported clade distinct from the Stachybotrys clade. Currently, the genus Memnoniella is composed of 11 species, and more than 50 species of Stachybotrys are accepted.

To date, Arcopilus and Memnoniella species have not been described in Korea. The aim of the present study was to perform morphological and molecular analyses to characterize 3 ascomycetes species in Korea: Ar. aureus, M. echinata, and S. sansevieriae.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Isolation of fungal strains from freshwater and soil samples

In 2017, freshwater samples were collected from the Wonhyo Valley located at Mudeung Mt., Gwangju, and Geum River located in Gongju, Korea. The samples were transferred to sterile 50-mL conical tubes (SPL Life Sciences Co., Pocheon, Korea) and stored at 4 °C until examination. In 2017, soil samples were collected from Geumgol Mountain located in Jindo Island, Korea. These samples were transported in sterile 50-mL Falcon tubes and stored at 4 °C, until examination. Fungi were isolated using the serial dilution plating technique. Briefly, 1 mL of water or 1 g of soil was mixed with 9 mL of sterile distilled water, shaken for 7–10 min, and serially diluted from 10−1 to 10−4. An aliquot of 0.1 mL from each dilution was transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA; 39 g of potato dextrose agar in 1 L of deionized water) and incubated at 25 °C for 3–7 days. Individual colonies of fungi that showed varying morphologies were selected and transferred to PDA plates.

All pure isolates, including Ar. aureus, M. echinata, and S. sansevieriae were maintained in PDA slant tubes and stored in 20% glycerol at −80 °C at the Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Fungarium, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. Ar. aureus, M. echinata, and S. sansevieriae strains isolated in our study were designated as CNUFC-KMHY6-1 and CNUFC-KMHY6-2, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 and CNUFC-MSW24-2-12, CNUFC-GW2S-4 and CNUFC-GW2S-5, respectively. CNUFC-KMHY6-1 was also deposited at the Collection of National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR, Incheon, Korea); CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 and CNUFC-GW2S-4 were deposited at the Culture Collection of the Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources (NNIBR, Sangju, Korea).

2.2. Morphological studies

For detailed morphological studies, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 and CNUFC-GW2S-4 strains were cultured on PDA, corn meal agar (CMA; 2 g of cornmeal and 2 g of agar in 1 L of deionized water), and oatmeal agar (OA; 30 g of oatmeal and 20 g of agar in 1 L of deionized water). CNUFC-KMHY6-1 strain was cultured on PDA, OA, and potato carrot agar (PCA; 20 g of potato, 20 g of carrot, and 20 g of agar in 1 L of deionized water). The plates were incubated at 15, 25, and 35 °C in the dark for 14 days. The samples were mounted in distilled water or lactophenol solution (Junsei Chemical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and observed using an Olympus BX51 microscope with differential interference contrast optics (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted directly from the mycelia of the fungal isolates by using the Solgent Genomic DNA prep Kit (Solgent Co. Ltd., Daejeon, Korea). The ITS region and RPB2 were amplified with the primer pairs ITS4 and ITS5 [25], and fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR [26], respectively. The PCR amplification mixture (total volume, 20 µL) contained fungal DNA template, 5 pmol/µL of each primer, and Accupower PCR Premix (Bioneer Corp., Daejeon, Korea). The PCR products were purified using the Accuprep PCR Purification Kit (Bioneer Corp.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA sequencing was performed with an ABI 3700 Automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA).

2.4. Phylogenetic analysis

The fungal sequences obtained from the GenBank database (Table 1) were aligned using Clustal_X v. 2.0 [27] and edited with Bioedit v. 7.2.5 software [28]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA 6 software [29], and maximum likelihood was constructed by Kimura’s two-parameter correction method. The reliability of internal branches was assessed using the p-distance substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replications.

Table 1.

Taxa, collection numbers, sequences, and GenBank accession numbers used in this study.

Taxon name Collection No.
(Isolate No.)
GenBank accession No.
ITS RPB2
Achaetomium globosum CBS 332.67 KX976570 KM655441
A. luteum CBS 618.68 KX976571 KX976794
A. macrosporum CBS 152.97 KX976573 KX976796
Arcopilus aureus CBS 153.52 KX976582 KX976806
Ar. aureus CBS 538.73 KX976583 KX976807
Ar. aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-1 MH685565 MH699880
Ar. aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-2 MH685566 MH699881
Ar. cupreus CBS 560.80 KX976584 KX976808
Ar. flavigenus CBS 337.67 KX976587 KX976811
Ar. fusiformis CBS 484.85 KX976585 KX976809
Ar. turgidopilosus CBS 169.52 KX976588 KX976812
Cymostachys coffeicola CBS 252.76 KU846052 KU846081
C. fabispora CBS 136180 KU846054 KU846082
Memnoniella brunneoconidiophora CBS 109477 KU846138 KU846192
M. dichroa CBS 526.50 KU846140 KU846194
M. echinata CBS 216.32 KU846142 KU846196
M. echinata CBS 343.50 KU846144 KU846198
M. echinata CBS 627.66 KU846147 KU846201
M. echinata DAOM 235365 KU846149 KU846203
M. echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 MH685569 MH699882
M. echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-12 MH685570 MH699883
M. humicola CBS 463.74 KU846154 KU846208
M. oenanthes CBS 388.73 KU846156 KU846210
M. putrefolia CBS 101177 KU846158 KU846212
Ovatospora unipora CBS 109.83 KX976689 KX976902
O. medusarum CBS 148.67 KX976684 KX976897
Stachybotrys chartarum CBS 136161 KU846702 KU846927
S. chlorohalonata CBS 109285 AY180261 KU846954
S. limonispora CBS 128809 KU846735 KU846959
S. sansevieriae HGUP 0103 JX998165 JX987249
S. sansevieriae KNU16-141 KY587783  
S. sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-4 MH685567 MH699878
S. sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-5 MH685568 MH699879
S. subcylindrospora HGUP 0201 JX998163 JX998168
Striatibotrys rhabdospora CBS 528.80 KU846760 KU846981
St. atypica CBS 141059 KU846753 KU846973
Lasiosphaeria ovina SMH4605 AY587923 AY600284
Peethambara sundara CBS 521.96 KU846470 KU846508

Bold letters indicate isolates and accession numbers determined in our study.

ITS: internal transcribed spacer; RPB2: RNA polymerase II second largest subunit; CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CNUFC: Chonnam National University Fungal Collection, Gwangju, South Korea; DAOM: Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada; HGUP: Herbarium of Guizhou University, Plant Pathology, China.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic analyses of the 2 sequence datasets (ITS and RPB2) showed that the strains CNUFC-KMHY6-1, CNUFC-KMHY6-2, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, CNUFC-MSW24-2-12, CNUFC-GW2S-4, and CNUFC-GW2S-5 were placed within the same clade with species of Arcopilus, Memnoniella, and Stachybotrys (Figures 1–4).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree based on neighbor-joining analysis of internal transcribed rDNA sequences for Arcopilus aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-1 and Arcopilus aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-2. Lasiosphaeria ovina was used as the outgroup. Bootstrap support values of >50% are indicated at the nodes. The bar indicates the number of substitutions per position. Ex-type strains are in bold.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic tree based on neighbor-joining analysis of RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) sequences for Arcopilus aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-1 and Arcopilus aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-2. Lasiosphaeria ovina was used as the outgroup. Bootstrap support values of >50% are indicated at the nodes. The bar indicates the number of substitutions per position. Ex-type strains are in bold.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic tree based on neighbor-joining analysis of internal transcribed rDNA sequences for Memnoniella echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, Memnoniella echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-12, Stachybotrys sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-4, and Stachybotrys sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-5. Peethambara sundara was used as the outgroup. Bootstrap support values of >50% are indicated at the nodes. The bar indicates the number of substitutions per position. Ex-type and epi-type strains are in bold.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Phylogenetic tree based on neighbor-joining analysis of RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) sequences for Memnoniella echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, Memnoniella echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-12, Stachybotrys sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-4, and Stachybotrys sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-5. Peethambara sundara was used as the outgroup. Bootstrap support values of >50% are indicated at the nodes. The bar indicates the number of substitutions per position. Ex-type and epi-type strains are in bold.

In BLASTn for the ITS sequences, CNUFC-KMHY6-1, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, and CNUFC-GW2S-4 showed 100% (500/500 bp), 100% (663/663 bp), and 100% (513/513 bp) sequence identity values with Ar. aureus (GenBank accession No. KX976582), M. echinata (GenBank accession No. KU846149), and S. sansevieriae (GenBank accession No. JX998165), respectively.

In BLASTn for the RPB2 sequences, CNUFC-KMHY6-1, CNUFC-MSW24-2-11, and CNUFC-GW2S-4 strains showed 99.8% (495/496 bp), 100% (526/526 bp), and 100% (743/743 bp) identity values with Ar. aureus (GenBank accession No. KX976806), M. echinata (GenBank accession No. KU846196), and S. sansevieriae (GenBank accession No. JX987249), respectively.

3.2. Taxonomy

3.2.1. Taxonomy of CNUFC-KMHY6-1

Arcopilus aureus (Chivers) X. Wei Wang & Samson, Stud. Mycol. 84: 217 (2016) (Table 2, Figure 5).

Table 2.

Morphological characteristics of CNUFC-KMHY6-1 and the reference species Arcopilus aureus (≡C. aureum).

Characteristics CNUFC-KMHY6-1 Arcopilus aureus (≡C. aureum)a,b
Colony color Initially white-to-orange, later greenish, reverse reddish purple First gray, pale olive then yellow
Ascomata Superficial, globose or oval, 76.3–157.8 × 96.7–165.8 μm Minute, globose or subglobose, 127 × 115 μm (110–140 × 105–123 μm)
Lateral hairs Apically incurved Numerous, slender, straight or flexed
Terminal hairs Mostly hook shape, verrucose, arcuate, slightly circinate to coiled Minutely roughened, straight or slightly recurved
Asci Fasciculate, clavate, with 8 biseriate or irregularly arranged ascospores, 24.9–41.5 × 7.3–12.8 μm Club-shaped, 8-spored, 42 × 10 μm
Ascospore Brown when mature, 9.2–11.5 × 4.5–6.5 μm, sometimes irregular, fusiform, limoniform, lunate, with one or two apical germ pores Irregularly ovate, apiculate at both ends, 9.8 × 5.4 μm (9.4–11 × 4.7–5.6 μm)

a,bFrom the description by Wang et al. [18] and Chivers [30].

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Morphology of Arcopilus aureus CNUFC-KMHY6-1. A) and D) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA); B) and E) Colony on potato carrot agar (PCA); C) and F) Colony on oatmeal agar (OA) [A)-C) top view, D)–F) reverse view)]; G) and O) Ascomata; H) and Q) Ascomatal hair; I) and P) Structure and surface of ascomatal wall; J)–L) Asci and ascospores; M), N), and R) Ascospores [Scale bars: G), H), and O) = 50 μm; I), K), and L) = 20 μm; J) = 40 μm; M) and N) = 5 μm; P) and Q) = 2.5 μm; R) = 5 μm).

Chaetomium aureum Chivers, Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts & Sci. 48: 86 (1912).

Description: Colonies grew moderately at 25 °C on PDA, reaching 66 mm in diameter after 15 days at 25 °C. The colony color was initially white-to-orange, later greenish. The colony reverse was reddish purple. Ascomata were superficial, globose or oval, 76.3–157.8 × 96.7–165.8 µm. Lateral hairs were apically incurved. Terminal hairs were brown, mostly hook shape, verrucose, arcuate, slightly circinate to coiled. Asci were fasciculate, clavate, with 8 biseriate or irregularly arranged ascospores, 24.9–41.5 × 7.3–12.8 µm. Ascospores were brown when mature, 9.2–11.5 × 4.5–6.5 µm, sometimes irregular, fusiform, limoniform, lunate, with one or two apical germ pores. The optimal growth temperature was 35 °C.

3.2.2. Taxonomy of CNUFC-MSW24-2-11

Memnoniella echinata (Riv.) Galloway, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 18: 165 (1933) (Table 3, Figure 6).

  • Penicillium echinatum Riv., Dei Parassiti Vegetali: 451 (1873).

  • Haplographium echinatum (Riv.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 4: 307 (1886).

  • Stachybotrys echinata (Riv.) G. Sm., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 45: 392 (1962).

  • =Periconia papyrogena Sacc., Michelia 1: 273 (1878).

  • Stachybotrys papyrogena (Sacc.) Sacc., Fungi Ital.: tab. 900 (1881).

  • Sterigmatobotrys papyrogena (Sacc.) Oud., Ned. Kruidk. Arch., ser. 2, 4: 548 (1886).

  • =Memnoniella aterrima Höhn., Zentralbl. Bakt. ParasitKde, Abt. 2 60: 16 (1923).

  • =Spinomyces japonica Saito, J. Ferment. Technol. 17: 2 (1939).

Table 3.

Morphological characteristics of CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 and the reference species Memnoniella echinata.

Characteristics CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 Memnoniella echinata a
Colony color Amber Amber to Sienna
Conidiophore Straight to slightly flexuous, smooth to slightly verrucose, unbranched, septate, 2.7–3.6 μm in width, variable in length Simple, macronematous, mononematous, single, thick-walled, unbranched, erect, straight to slightly flexuous, septate, smooth to slightly verrucose, 40–100 × 4–6 μm, bearing 6–10 conidiogenous cells
Conidiogenous cell Phialidic, clavate, smooth, 7.3–11.0 × 3.3–4.2 μm Phialidic, clavate to subcylindrical, smooth, 7–10 × 2–5 μm, with conspicuous collarettes
Conidia Globose to subglobose, verrucose, aseptate, 5.3–6.3 × 4.5–6.2 μm, formed in long dry chains Acrogenous, aseptate, globose, verrucose, thick-walled, 3–6 × 3–5 μm (average, 5 × 4 μm), formed in long dry chains

aFrom the description by Lombard et al. [24].

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Morphology of Memnoniella echinata CNUFC-MSW24-2-11. A) and D) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA); B) and E) Colony on oatmeal agar (OA); C) and F) Colony on corn meal agar (CMA) [A)–C) top view, D)–F) reverse view]; G)–K) and M)–P) Conidiophores, phialides and conidia; L) and Q) Conidia [Scale bars: G) = 40 μm; H)–L) = 20 μm; M)–O) = 20 μm; P) = 2 μm; Q) = 5 μm).

Description: Colonies grew slowly on OA, reaching 28 mm diameter after 10 days at 25 °C. The colony color was amber. The colony reverse was also amber. Conidiophores were straight to slightly flexuous, smooth to slightly verrucose, unbranched, septate, 2.7–3.6 µm in width, and variable in length. Conidiogenous cells were phialidic, clavate, smooth, 7.3–11.0 × 3.3–4.2 µm. Conidia were globose to subglobose, verrucose, aseptate, 5.3–6.3 × 4.5–6.2 µm, formed in long dry chains. On OA, growth was faster than on CMA and PDA, and abundant sporulation was observed when grown on OA.

3.2.3. Taxonomy of CNUFC-GW2S-4

Stachybotrys sansevieriae G.P. Agarwal & N.D. Sharma, J. Indian Bot. Soc. 53: 78 (1974) (Table 4, Figure 7).

Table 4.

Morphological characteristics of CNUFC-GW2S-4 and the reference species Stachybotrys sansevieriae.

Character CNUFC-GW2S-4 Stachybotrys sansevieriae a
Colony color Brown to dark sepia NA
Conidiophore Macronematous, mononematous, erected, straight, unbranched, septae, cylindrical, 28.1–73.8 × 2.4–5.5 μm Subhyaline to pale brown, up to 60 μm long
Conidiogenous cell Phialidic, obovate, smooth, 8.3–12.5 × 3.5–6.1 μm 8–13 × 3–4 μm
Conidia Ellipsoidal, unicellular, 5.4–10.1 × 3.5–6.9 μm Navicular, dark brown, 6–9 × 3–4 μm

aFrom the description by Pinruan et al. [19].

NA: not available.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Morphology of Stachybotrys sansevieriae CNUFC-GW2S-4. A) and D) Colony on potato dextrose agar (PDA); B) and E) Colony on oatmeal agar (OA); C) and F) Colony on corn meal agar (CMA) [A)–C) top view, D)–F) reverse view]; G)–J), L), and M)–O) Conidiophores and phialides; K) and P) Conidia (Scale bars: G)–M) = 20 μm, N) = 5 μm, O) = 10 μm, P) = 2 μm).

=Stachybotrys indica P.C. Misra, Mycotaxon 2: 107 (1975).

Description: Colonies grew slowly on PDA, reaching 23.5 mm diameter after 15 days at 25 °C. The colony color was brown to dark sepia. The colony reverse was dark sepia. Conidiophores were straight, unbranched, with septate, cylindrical, 28.1–73.8 µm in length, and 2.4–8.5 µm in width. Conidiogenous cells were phialidic, obovate, smooth, 8.3–12.5 × 3.5–6.1 µm. Conidia were ellipsoidal, unicellular, 5.4–10.1 × 3.5–6.9 µm. On PDA, growth was slower than on OA and CMA, and abundant sporulation was observed when grown on OA and CMA.

4. Discussion

In this study, two species of Ar. aureus and M. echinata were isolated from soil sample and one species of S. sansevieriae from freshwater sample in Korea. Ar. aureus and M. echinata have been recorded for the first time in Korea, and S. sansevieriae is the first report from freshwater niche in Korea.

In previous studies, SSU, LSU, TEF, and RPB2 sequence data have been used for phylogeny of the class Sordariomycetes [2,17]. In the present study, the phylogenetic trees for selected genera within the family Chaetomiaceae and Stachybotryaceae were inferred from ITS and RPB2 sequence data and provided to infer the phylogenetic position of the 3 species.

Our analyses of ITS and RPB2 sequences showed that the strains CNUFC-KMHY6-1 and CNUFC-KMHY6-2 were clustered with other Ar. aureus species in a well-supported clade with high bootstrap values (Figures 1 and 2). The morphological features of our isolate were generally similar to the description of C. aureum (≡Ar. aureus) by Chivers et al. [30]. Many Chaetomium-like fungi produce secondary metabolites with different biological activities. Interestingly, Dwibedi and Saxena [31] have reported that Ar. aureus produces resveratrol. Resveratrol is a polyphenolic flavonoid and widely used as a therapeutic moiety as well as a pharmacophore for the development of novel drugs because of its various beneficial effects [31]. It has been reported to have beneficial effects in the treatment of neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s, dementia, and Parkinson’s diseases [32,33]. This finding suggests that the strain CNUFC-KMHY6-1 is a potentially useful source for medical and biotechnological applications and needs to be investigated further.

In the phylogenetic trees based on ITS and RPB2 sequences, the 2 investigated strains CNUFC-MSW24-2-11 and CNUFC-MSW24-2-12 were clustered with other M. echinata species in a well-supported clade with high bootstrap values (Figures 3 and 4). The morphological features of our isolate were consistent with the description of M. echinata by Lombard et al. [24]. However, the size of the conidia was 5.3–6.3 × 4.5–6.2 µm, which was slightly larger than the conidia (3–6 × 3–5 µm) for M. echinata described by Lombard et al. [24].

In the ITS phylogenetic tree, the strains CNUFC-GW2S-4 and CNUFC-GW2S-5 were clustered in the same clade with S. limonispora CBS 128809, S. sansevieriae HGUP 0103, S. sansevieriae KNU16-141, and S. subcylindrospora HGUP 0201 (Figure 3). However, the RPB2 sequences of CNUFC-GW2S-4 and CNUFC-GW2S-5 were easily distinguishable and were well separated in the phylogeny (Figure 4). In 2017, the species of S. sansevieriae was isolated from field soils in Korea by Adhikari et al. [34] without detailed description such as the size of conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia. There was no any detailed phylogenetic analysis of the species in the family Stachybotriaceae.

Morphologically, S. sansevieriae reported here had a close similarity with the description by Pinruan et al. [19], although slight differences in the size of the conidia were noted. In comparison with other related species, our S. sansevieriae isolate presented ellipsoidal conidia (5.4–10.1 × 3.5–6.9 µm) that were larger than the ellipsoidal to limoniform conidia of S. limonispora ((6–)6.5–7.5(–9)×3–4 µm) [24] and smaller than the cylindrical to subcylindrical conidia of S. subcylindrospora ((9.7–)11.6–13.8(–14.7)×(2.9–)3.8–4.6(–5) µm) [35]. Furthermore, in the phylogenetic tree based on RPB2 sequence data, our strains formed a separate branch from S. limonispora CBS 128809 and S. subcylindrospora HGUP 0201.

Among species of the genus Stachybotrys, S. chartarum is known to produce mycotoxins, including the macrocyclic trichothecenes [36], as well as diverse immunosuppressant agents [37,38]. Our newly recorded isolate M. echinata is closely related to S. chartarum. According to Jarvis et al. [39,40], M. echinata produces mycotoxins, including cytotoxic trichothecenes, as well as several griseofulvins. Our findings contribute to the understanding of three Sordariomycetes genera Arcopilus, Memnoniella, and Stachybotrys and increase the number of undiscovered species from freshwater and soil in Korea. Further studies on these 3 newly reported fungal isolates from Korea need to be performed.

Funding Statement

This work was in part supported by the Graduate Program for the Undiscovered Taxa of Korea, and in part by the Project on Survey and Discovery of Indigenous Fungal Species of Korea funded by NIBR and Project on Discovery of Fungi from Freshwater and Collection of Fungarium funded by NNIBR of the Ministry of Environment (MOE), and in part carried out with the support of Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development [PJ013744], Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. This work was in part supported by the BK21 plus program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • 1. Lumbsch HT. Phylogeny of filamentous ascomycetes. Naturwissenschaften. 2000;87:335–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhang N, Castlebury LA, Miller AN, et al. An overview of the systematics of the Sordariomycetes based on a four-gene phylogeny. Mycologia. 2006;98:1076–1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, et al. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Sordariomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2015;72:199–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, et al. Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2016;79:1–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ho WH, Hyde KD, Hodgkiss IJ. Fungal communities on submerged wood from streams in Brunei, Hong Kong and Malaysia. Mycol Res. 2001;105:1492–1501. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cai L, Tsui CKM, Zhang KQ, et al. Aquatic fungi from Lake Fuxian, Yunnan, China. Fungal Divers. 2002;9:57–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jones EBG, Suetrong S, Sakayaroj J, et al. Classification of marine Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota and Chytridiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2015;73:1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sung GH, Hywel-Jones NL, Sung JM, et al. Phylogenetic classification of Cordyceps and the clavicipitaceous fungi. Stud Mycol. 2007;57:5–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, et al. Fungal diversity notes 367–491: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016;80:1–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jaklitsch WM, Voglmayr H. Phylogenetic relationships of five genera of Xylariales and Rosasphaeria gen. nov. (Hypocreales). Fungal Divers. 2012;52:75–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. PeiGui L, DoiY X, Hua W, et al. The Hypocreaceae of China III. Some fungicolous species of the genus Hypocrea . Mycosystema. 2000;19:317–327. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Barr ME. The ascomycetes connection. Mycologia. 1983;75:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Barr ME. Prodromus to class Loculoascomycetes. Massachusetts: Amherst; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Barr ME. Prodromus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon. 1990;39:43–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Eriksson O, Hawksworth DL. Outline of the Ascomycetes—1993. Syst Ascomycetum. 1993;12:1–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW, Blackwell M. Introductory mycology. New York: Wiley; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hongsanan S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, et al. An updated phylogeny of Sordariomycetes based on phylogenetic and molecular clock evidence. Fungal Divers. 2017;84:25–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wang XW, Houbraken J, Groenewald JZ, et al. Diversity and taxonomy of Chaetomium and chaetomium-like fungi from indoor environments. Stud Mycol. 2016;84:145–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pinruan U, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, et al. Two new species of Stachybotrys, and a key to the genus. Fungal Divers. 2004;17:145–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wang Y, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, et al. Overview of Stachybotrys (Memnoniella) and current species status. Fungal Divers. 2015;71:17–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Smith G. Some new and interesting species of micro-fungi. III. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1962;45:387–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Carmichael JW, Kendrick WB, Conners IL, et al. Genera of hyphomycetes. Edmonto: University Alberta Press; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Haugland RA, Vesper SJ, Harmon SM. Phylogenetic relationships of Memnoniella and Stachybotrys species and evaluation of morphological features for Memnoniella species identification. Mycologia. 2001;93:54–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lombard L, Houbraken J, Decock C, et al. Generic hyper-diversity in Stachybotriaceae. Persoonia. 2016;36:156–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:1799–1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, et al. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chivers AH. A monograph of the genera Chaetomium and Ascotricha . Mem Torrey Bot Club. 1915;14:155–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dwibedi V, Saxena S. Arcopilus aureus, a resveratrol-producing endophyte from Vitis vinifera . Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;186:476–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Li F, Gong Q, Dong H, et al. Resveratrol, a neuroprotective supplement for Alzheimer's disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lange KW, Li S. Resveratrol, pterostilbene, and dementia. Biofactors. 2018;44:83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Adhikari M, Gurung SM, Bazie S, et al. Seven unrecorded fungal species from field soils in Korea. Kor J Mycol. 2018;46:9–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jie CY, Geng K, Jiang YL, et al. Stachybotrys from soil in China, identified by morphology and molecular phylogeny. Mycol Progress. 2013;12:693–698. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. BB Jarvis. Macrocyclic trichothecenes In: Sharma RP, Salunkhe DK, editors. Mycotoxins and phytoalexins in human and animal health. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991. p. 361–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Roggo B, Petersen F, Sills M, et al. Novel spirodihydrobenzofuranlactams as antagonists of endothelin and as inhibitors of HIV-1 protease produced by Stachybotrys sp. I. Fermentation, isolation and biological activity. J Antibiot. 1996;49:13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Roggo BE, Hug P, Moss S, et al. Novel spirodihydrobenzofuranlactams as antagonists of endothelin and as inhibitors of HIV-1 protease produced by Stachybotrys sp. II. Structure determination. J Antibiot. 1996;49:374–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jarvis BB, Sorenson WG, Hintikka EL, et al. Study of toxin production by isolates of Stachybotrys chartarum and Memnoniella echinata isolated during a study of pulmonary hemosiderosis in infants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3620–3625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Jarvis BB, Zhou Y, Wang S, et al. Toxigenic molds in water-damaged buildings: dechlorogriseofulvins from Memnoniella echinata . J Nat Prod. 1996;59:553–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES