Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Apr 5;9:5663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41642-y

All semiconductor enhanced high-harmonic generation from a single nanostructured cone

Dominik Franz 1, Shatha Kaassamani 1, David Gauthier 1, Rana Nicolas 1, Maria Kholodtsova 1, Ludovic Douillard 2, Jean-Thomas Gomes 3, Laure Lavoute 3, Dmitry Gaponov 3, Nicolas Ducros 3, Sebastien Février 3,4, Jens Biegert 5, Liping Shi 6, Milutin Kovacev 6, Willem Boutu 1, Hamed Merdji 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6450872  PMID: 30952870

Abstract

The enhancement and control of non-linear phenomena at a nanometer scale has a wide range of applications in science and in industry. Among these phenomena, high-harmonic generation in solids is a recent focus of research to realize next generation petahertz optoelectronic devices or compact all solid state EUV sources. Here, we report on the realization of the first nanoscale high harmonic source. The strong field regime is reached by confining the electric field from a few nanojoules femtosecond laser in a single 3D semiconductor waveguide. We reveal a strong competition between enhancement of coherent harmonics and incoherent fluorescence favored by excitonic processes. However, far from the band edge, clear enhancement of the harmonic emission is reported with a robust sustainability offering a compact nanosource for applications. We illustrate the potential of our harmonic nano-device by performing a coherent diffractive imaging experiment. Ultra-compact UV/X-ray nanoprobes are foreseen to have other applications such as petahertz electronics, nano-tomography or nano-medicine.

Introduction

Ultrafast nano-photonics science is emerging thanks to the extraordinary progresses in nano-fabrication and ultrafast laser science. Boosting laser fields in nanostructured photonic devices to the strong field regime has the potential of creating nano-localized sources of energetic photons or particles, opening vast applications. Nowadays, optoelectronics is extending to the highly non-linear regime where electron currents can be optically controlled under strong fields in semiconductors. A recent impact of this capability is the emergence of high-harmonic generation (HHG) in crystals1–5. High harmonics are emitted when electrons undergo either intra-band or inter-band processes. These above bandgap phenomena occur efficiently in a crystal exit layer of sub-micrometer thickness2 down to an atomically thin layer6–10. The strong electron currents from which HHG originates can be manipulated in space and time. This, in turn, allows to localize the HHG process in time at the single optical cycle scale4 and in space at a nanometer scale to create for example beams that carry orbital angular momentum11. This control can not only revolutionize attosecond science but also prepare a new generation of ultrafast visible to X-ray optoelectronic devices operating at petahertz frequencies.

The high intensity needed for HHG in solids requires large laser amplification systems which limits the integration of the source in advanced devices. However, nanoscale field enhancement is nowadays a technology used to stimulate non-linear phenomena12,13. Different meta-surfaces of metallic14–16, dielectric and semiconductor17–19 as well as metallic/dielectric and metallic/semiconductor hybrid structures20–22 were successfully used to boost non-linear processes. In 2016, Han et al. showed the enhancement of high harmonics from a 800 nm femtosecond oscillator operating at 75 MHz repetition rate using plasmonic resonances in hybrid sapphire-metal waveguides23. Enhancement of high-harmonic generation induced by an array of metallic nano-rods has been observed24,25. Plasmonic resonances ensure extremely high enhancement of the local electric field with sub-diffraction-limited hot spots. Another route for HHG enhancement is to use a full semiconductor structure. This is not the first time that such structures are used. Indeed, recent works have studied samples composed of an array of structures and for light emitted around the crystal bandgap26–28. Liu et al. have recently reported on the enhancement of harmonics using an array of structures patterned on an all-dielectric 2D surface29. The main difference of our work is that we use a single nanostructure to create a nanoscale size HHG source opening the path for a compact ultrafast extreme UV (EUV) nano-probe. In addition, we explore the enhancement regime of above band gap harmonics which are relevant for further extension of the HHG nanosource to the EUV. We also illustrate the potential of the nanostructured cone to produce a nanosource of hot electrons.

Results

The principle is based on the confinement of the laser light in an integrated structure to reach the intensity threshold that allows for high-harmonic generation from a few nanojoules mid-infrared fiber laser. The effective laser intensity is raised up from the sub-TW/cm2 to the TW/cm2 regime inside a single zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructured waveguide as illustrated in Fig. 1a. The design of the structure and the results from finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations of the intensity enhancement are shown in Fig. 1b. As the beam propagates towards the tip of the ZnO nanostructured cone, the fundamental intensity is enhanced by more than one order of magnitude in a sub-laser-wavelength volume. The simulation of the laser confinement at the output surface in the plane perpendicular to the propagation direction shows a regular centered mode (see Fig. 1c). Note that intensity enhancement close to the exit surface is mandatory for efficient above bandgap HHG because high harmonics cannot propagate more than few 100 nanometers in the bulk crystal due to their strong absorption1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Field enhancement in the semiconductor waveguide. (a) Schematics of the field enhancement. The local field enhancement increases moderate pump intensities of 0.05–0.2 TW/cm2 provided by the laser to up to 5 TW/cm2 and allows for HHG. The SEM picture shows our structure patterned on a bulk ZnO crystal with the dimensions: base size of 4.1 µm in diameter, height of 6.1 µm and top of 2.6 µm. The vertical black thick bar represents 2 µm. (b) Simulation of the intensity distribution in the cone (plane spanned by k- and E-vectors). Significant intensity enhancement occurs on the tip of the cone by a factor larger than 20. The simulation has been done with the experimental parameters. c Intensity enhancement at the exit of the cone (plane perpendicular to the propagation direction) 100 nm below the top surface of the cone.

The layout of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2 (see methods). The laser, of few nanojoules energy, is coupled into the cone entrance to seed the harmonic emission. Using a UV/VIS spectrometer, we have measured emission spectra at different pump intensities. The results are displayed in Fig. 3a,b. At low pump intensity of 0.07 TW/cm2 only H3 is generated from the bare crystal and emission from the defect states (450–550 nm band) is noticeable (blue curve, Fig. 3a). While this intensity is not sufficient to trigger above-band gap harmonic generation in the bare crystal, H5, H7 and H9 are efficiently generated when the laser is focused into the cone (red curve, Fig. 3a). The Supplementary Movie S1 shows the dynamic enhancement when the isolated truncated cone is scanned across the laser beam focus. In Fig. 3a, we notice a very strong enhancement of the luminescence generated at the excitonic band edge (385 nm) and the defect states spectral regions. When increasing the pump intensity to 0.17 TW/cm2, we notice that H5, H7 and H9 and the luminescence are generated from the bare crystal (blue curve, Fig. 3b). When focusing into the nanostructured cone, all harmonic orders and the luminescence are dramatically enhanced with respect to the bare crystal (red curve, Fig. 3b). We see that the luminescence from the band edge, which could be barely measured from the bare crystal, is strongly enhanced. The 5th harmonic, although distinguishable, cannot be used to retrieve quantitative information of the full intensity dependence. Moreover, Fig. 3c reports the non-perturbative intensity dependence of the luminescence which scales as I3.1. This does not allow us to clearly identify the strong field origin of the harmonic emission such as reported by Sivis et al.28.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Experimental setup. The laser used in this experiment is an all fiber laser with 2.1 µm operating wavelength, 85 fs pulse duration, 19 MHz repetition rate and 8.7 nJ maximum pulse energy. The laser is focused with an off-axis parabola (f = 25 mm) into the sample to a spot size of 5.9 µm (FWHM) at normal incidence. The intensity range used in the experiment is 0.05–0.2 TW/cm2. The light exiting the cone is collected by a lens towards a spectrometer or a CCD camera. Different transmission filters can be used to select a specific harmonic order. The spatial profile of H7 emitted from the cone is shown as an inset.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Intensity-dependent signal yield. (a,b) Spectra emitted from the ZnO cone (red curve) and from the bare crystal (blue curve) measured at pump intensities of 0.07 TW/cm2 and 0.17 TW/cm2, respectively. The harmonics H3, H5, H7 and H9 are highlighted as well as the luminescence from the band edge at 385 nm and from defect states. (c,d) Intensity dependence and power law of the harmonic yield for H7 and H9 from the bare crystal (blue crosses) and the cone (red circles), respectively. The power law for the luminescence from the band edge generated in the cone is shown in (c) as magenta triangles.

In order to discriminate between coherent and incoherent enhancement, we concentrated our study on higher harmonic orders. H7 (300 nm) and H9 (233 nm) stand well above the ZnO excitonic band edge which allows for a clear observation of the coherent enhancement process. H7 and H9 are enhanced in the cone (red curve) by more than two orders of magnitude with respect to the bare crystal (blue curve) at low intensity (Fig. 3a) and by around one order of magnitude at higher intensity (Fig. 3b). Figure 3c,d report the intensity power law dependencies of H7 and H9, respectively. Note that the background produced by the saturated 3rd harmonic is below H7 and H9 signals and its subtraction was efficiently achieved during the analysis. While H7 and H9 behave perturbatively with the laser intensity when generated in the bulk (with close to Iq dependencies for harmonic order q), their yield scales non-perturbatively when enhanced in the cone.

To investigate the sustainability of the harmonic nano-source, we have monitored the temporal evolution of the harmonic signal which exhibits unexpected dynamics. For intensities below one TW/cm2, the harmonic signal emitted from the nanostructured cone was enhanced during hours as shown in Fig. 4a,b for H7 and H9, respectively. After exposure of a pristine cone to the laser, the harmonic signal first increases during a time span of up to half an hour and then decreases and tends towards a constant value. The temporal evolution of the harmonic emission is related to a structural modification of the cone, similarly to a study in bow-tie antenna recently reported30. Two deep subwavelength cracks appear close to the center of the cone after half an hour of exposure (SEM-image in Fig. 4c)31. Due to the local field enhancement self-organized reshaping occurs which leads to a higher field enhancement than in the initial pristine cone. This explains the initial increase of the harmonic signal. For longer exposure the reshaping continues and the top surface of the cone becomes porous (SEM-image in Fig. 4d), which leads to a decrease of the harmonic signal. We found that the damages occur at the position of highest field enhancement (Fig. 1b,c), i.e. in the center of the output surface of the cone, and that the linear cracks are perpendicular to the laser polarization. Those cracks are associated to emission of ions and electrons. We have further confirmed the field localization at the top of the nanoprobe by measuring the spatial distribution of hot electrons emitted during the strong field interaction (see Fig. 4e). The measurement is realized using photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM, see methods) with a spatial resolution of about 35 nm32. The central bright spot corresponds to the non-linearly photo-emitted electrons with an energy ranging from 6 to 12 eV and a source size of 590 nm full width at half maximum (FWHM). Note that this illustrates another potential of our semiconductor waveguide to create nanoscale source of hot electrons.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Temporal evolution of the harmonic emission. Temporal evolution of (a) H7 and (b) H9 from a cone at an intensity of 0.17 TW/cm2 (red curve). The signal is observed over a time of 3 hours. SEM-images of the top of a cone after an exposure time of half an hour and 3 hours, respectively at an intensity of 0.17 TW/cm2 are shown in (c,d). The polarization direction is indicated by a black arrow. The initial cone, before irradiation, is shown as an inset in (c). (e) Image of hot electrons emitted by the cone taken by photo-emission electron microscopy (PEEM). The cone is back illuminated by a 775 nm pulsed laser beam under an angle of 45°. The image is a superposition of two simultaneously acquired images, one recorded in low energy electron microscopy imaging mode (LEEM, topographic signature) and one in PEEM imaging mode (photoelectron signature).

The strong localization of the electron emission reflects the nanoscale field enhancement inside the structure and is correlated to the harmonic source size. From the simulation shown in Fig. 1c, the transverse mode of the fundamental beam at the top of the cone has a size of 900 nm. The diameter of H7 emission from the cone was measured to be 800 nm (FWHM) (see inset in Fig. 2). This opens perspectives in the realization of UV/EUV nano-probes for spectroscopy or imaging applications. As an example, HHG can be used to image nanoscale objects in a femtosecond snapshot33,34. Here, we selected H5 emitted from the cone by using a narrow bandwidth filter to investigate the feasibility of coherent diffractive imaging (CDI). A generic layout is displayed in Fig. 5. The beam is focused onto a sample consisting in a nanoscale pattern realized on a thin opaque membrane (see methods). The coherence of the harmonic source allows to measure a well contrasted diffraction pattern in the far field. The incoherent part of the emission due to fluorescence creates a constant background that does not contribute to the diffraction pattern. The image of the sample was reconstructed using a phase retrieval hybrid input-output algorithm which acts as a virtual lens (see methods). The CDI reconstruction reproduces well the cross-shape of the sample with a spatial resolution of 1.6 µm. This proof-of-principle can be extended to the sub-100 nanometer range by using higher band gap material to push the HHG spectrum to shorter wavelengths2. Besides illustrating the coherence of the harmonics generated in the semiconductor cone, we propose the realization of a very compact ultrafast nanoscale microscope. Other techniques such as ptychography could allow generalizing the method to extended objects35.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Generic layout of the coherent diffractive imaging setup. Few nano-joules of our 2.1 µm femtosecond laser are injected in the cone. The emission from the cone was filtered in the far field to select the 5th harmonic and then focused on a nano-patterned test sample consisting in a partially occulted cross. The diffraction pattern is collected in the far field using a CCD detector. A phase retrieval algorithm is then applied to reconstruct the image of the sample. The white bars on the SEM images of the sample and the reconstructed image correspond to a distance of 2 µm.

Discussion

In conclusion, we have shown that high-harmonic generation can be confined in a single nanostructured semiconductor. We have shown the severe competition between the enhancement of incoherent fluorescence versus coherent harmonics. We report that the fluorescence dominates harmonics around the zinc oxide band gap. At energies well above the band gap, we demonstrated a clear enhancement of harmonics by at least two orders of magnitude. Our semiconductor harmonic nano-source shows a good sustainability, with hours long lifetime. Nanoscale enhancement can replace external laser amplifiers using few nano-joules femtosecond laser systems to boost non-linear processes to the strong field regime. Other control such as terahertz, two-color or DC field can be applied to our strong field optoelectronic device36–38. Single nano-emitters generate coherent UV/XUV radiation which offers a wide field of applications as, for example, ultrafast nanoscale imaging. Our nanostructured crystal can offer also an appealing source of hot electrons of nanometer scale size, the localization of which is directly controlled by the confinement of the electric field. Finally, our demonstrations pave the way towards a stable source of novel all-solid-state attosecond optoelectronic devices operating at petahertz frequencies. Additionally, the control of the laser phase gradient should also favor tailoring the spatial and spectral phases of the harmonic emission allowing controlled emission of attosecond pulses39.

Methods

Laser

The seed mode-locked oscillator delivers a train of 1.3 ps hyperbolic secant squared (sech2) shaped pulses centered at 1910 nm with a repetition rate of 19 MHz. The average power is 4 mW, corresponding to E = 0.2 nJ. The pulses are further amplified in a cladding-pumped amplifier based on large mode area thulium-doped fiber to tens of nano-joules. Multisolitonic effects lead to the pulse fission followed by ejection of high-energy (8.7 nJ) pulses that are frequency-shifted to 2100 nm. The spectrum has a central wavelength of 2103 nm and was measured with an optical spectrum analyzer (AQ6375, Yokogawa, Japan). The average power of the pulse train is 162 mW with a linear polarization state. The pulse duration was measured via autocorrelation to be 85 fs.

Experimental setup

The laser is focused using a 25 mm focal length off-axis parabola either in bulk or nanostructured ZnO. Harmonic spatial profiles can be imaged in the near-field (crystal sample exit) by a lens (f = 60 mm) and a CCD-camera (Photonlines, PCO.Ultraviolet). Harmonic spectra can be detected from the near infrared down to the deep UV (Ocean Optics QE Pro, cooled). For the imaging experiment, H5 is selected with a FB420-10 transmission filter from Thorlabs and focused by a f = 50 mm lens onto the PCO ultraviolet CCD camera.

Sample

The surface of a ZnO [0001] crystal is patterned with isolated truncated waveguide structures via focused ion beam (FIB) milling. The cone has a height of 6.1 µm, a bottom diameter of 4.1 µm and a top diameter of 2.6 µm. It is illuminated from the bottom with the 2.1 µm laser beam.

Simulations

Finite difference time domain (FDTD) calculations using LUMERICAL Solutions have been performed to optimize the local enhancement of the electromagnetic field in the cone at a wavelength of 2.1 μm. The material of both the cone and its substrate is ZnO. Its optical parameters were imported from Bond et al., 1965, to LUMERICAL and used throughout the simulations. The surrounding medium is air. The structure is illuminated by a Gaussian beam with ω = 5.0 µm wave at 2.1 μm wavelength from below the substrate. We used perfectly matching layers at the boundaries. A finite mesh of 40 nm was used on x, y and z. The calculation time is about 3 hours on a bi-processors Intel Haswell 10C E5-2650V3 (10 cores, 20 threads, max. frequency 3 GHz, Bus speed 9.6 GT/s QPI, 768 GB registered SDRAM (DDR4 2133, 68GB/s bandpass)).

CDI

The CDI sample has been patterned on a thin opaque membrane (75 nm Si3N4 + 150 nm Au) by focused ion beam milling. The raw diffraction data is shown in the Supplementary Information. The diffraction patterns take about 1/3 of the full CCD dimensions so that it is possible to measure the background associated to the luminescence which covers the whole CCD. Indeed, the luminescence is isotropic and adds a constant background to the diffraction pattern. Other source noise like light scattering is also included in the background. The background is subtracted to the diffraction pattern which is then inverted using a hybrid input output algorithm. The reconstruction image is the coherent average over 50 independent runs of the algorithm, of around 500 iterations each. From the phase retrieval transfer function criterion, the spatial resolution is estimated at 1.6 µm.

PEEM

Photoemission electron microscopy measurements are carried out on a LEEM/PEEM III instrument (Elmitec GmbH) operating under ultra-high vacuum conditions. In PEEM imaging mode the spatial resolution routinely achieved is 20 nm. The laser source is a mode-locked Ti:Al2O3 oscillator (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent Inc., repetition rate 80 MHz, pulse width 130 fs, wavelength range 680 nm–1000 nm). In addition to PEEM imaging, the instrument can be operated in low energy electron microscopy (LEEM) mode where backscattered electrons are used to create an image reflecting the topography of the sample.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (983.4KB, docx)
Video (3.2MB, mp4)

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Franck Fortuna and Laurent Delbecq for access and support to the nano-focused ion beam at the CSNSM laboratory (IN2P3, Paris Saclay University). We acknowledge support from the PETACom FET Open H2020, support from the French ministry of research through the ANR grants 2014”IPEX”, 2016 “HELLIX”, 2016 “BISCOT”, 2017 “PACHA”, the DGA RAPID grant “SWIM” and from the C’NANO research program through the NanoscopiX grant, and the LABEX “PALM” (ANR-10-LABX-0039-PALM) through he grants”Plasmon-X”, “STAMPS” and “HILAC”. We acknowledge the financial support from the French ASTRE program through the “NanoLight” grant. We aknowledge support from Conseil Régional de Nouvelle-Aquitaine grant 2017 “FLOWA”. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant KO 3798/4-11 and from Lower Saxony through “Quanten- und Nanometrologie” (QUANOMET), project NanoPhotonik are acknowledged. J.B. acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), through the “Severo Ochoa” Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015- 0522) and the Fundació Cellex Barcelona.

Author Contributions

D.F., S.K., D.G., R.N., W.B. and H.M. carried out the experiment. The samples were produced by W.B. The laser was developed by N.D., S.F., J.-T.G., L.L. and D.Gap. Simulations were performed by D.F., S.K., R.N. and D.G. The PEEM measurements were made by L.D. Data analysis was performed by D.F., S.K., D.G., R.N., M.Kh., W.B., J.B., L.S., M.K. and H.M. H.M. proposed the physical concept. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-41642-y.

References

  • 1.Ghimire S, et al. Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal. Nat. Phys. 2011;7:138–141. doi: 10.1038/nphys1847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Luu TT, et al. Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids. Nature. 2015;521:498–502. doi: 10.1038/nature14456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hohenleutner M, et al. Real-time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high-harmonic generation. Nature. 2015;523:572–575. doi: 10.1038/nature14652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schubert O, et al. Sub-cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical Bloch oscillations. Nature Photonics. 2014;8:119–123. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ndabashimiye G, et al. Solid-state harmonics beyond the atomic limit. Nature. 2016;534:520–523. doi: 10.1038/nature17660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu H, et al. High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nature Physics. 2016;13:262–265. doi: 10.1038/nphys3946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baudisch M, et al. Ultrafast nonlinear optical response of Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature. Communications. 2018;9:1018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03413-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaassamani, S. et al. High harmonic generation in graphene. Proceedings Volume 10673, Advances in Ultrafast Condensed Phase Physics; 106730G, 10.1117/12.2306789 (2018)
  • 9.Yoshikawa N, Tamaya T, Tanaka K. High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation. Science. 2017;356:736–738. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hafez HA, et al. Extremely efficient terahertz high-harmonic generation in graphene by hot Dirac fermions. Nature. 2018;561:507–511. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0508-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gauthier, et al. Orbital angular momentum from semiconductor high order harmonics. Optics Letters. 2019;44(3):546–549. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.000546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gramotnev DK, Bozhevolnyi SI. Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Photon. 2010;4:83–91. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schuller JA, et al. Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:193–204. doi: 10.1038/nmat2630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang S, et al. Pronounced Fano Resonance in Single Gold Split Nanodisks with 15 nm Split Gaps for Intensive Second Harmonic Generation. ACS Nano. 2016;10:11105–11114. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Metzger B, Hentschel M, Giessen H. Probing the Near-Field of Second-Harmonic Light around Plasmonic Nanoantennas. Nano Lett. 2017;17:1931–1937. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Butet J, Brevet P-F, Martin OJF. Optical Second Harmonic Generation in Plasmonic Nanostructures: From Fundamental Principles to Advanced Applications. ACS Nano. 2015;9:10545–10562. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Razdolski I, et al. Resonant Enhancement of Second-Harmonic Generation in the Mid-Infrared Using Localized Surface Phonon Polaritons in Subdiffractional Nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2016;16:6954–6959. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tong W, et al. Enhanced third harmonic generation in a silicon metasurface using trapped mode. Opt. Express, OE. 2016;24:19661–19670. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.019661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shorokhov AS, et al. Multifold Enhancement of Third-Harmonic Generation in Dielectric Nanoparticles Driven by Magnetic Fano Resonances. Nano Lett. 2016;16:4857–4861. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Metzger B, et al. Doubling the Efficiency of Third Harmonic Generation by Positioning ITO Nanocrystals into the Hot-Spot of Plasmonic Gap-Antennas. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2867–2872. doi: 10.1021/nl500913t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aouani H, Rahmani M, Navarro-Cía M, Maier SA. Third-harmonic-upconversion enhancement from a single semiconductor nanoparticle coupled to a plasmonic antenna. Nat. Nanotech. 2014;9:290–294. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ning T, Tan C, Niemi T, Kauranen M, Genty G. Enhancement of second-harmonic generation from silicon nitride with gold gratings. Opt. Express. 2015;23:30695–30700. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.030695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Han S, et al. High-harmonic generation by field enhanced femtosecond pulses in metal-sapphire nanostructure. Nature Communications. 2016;7:13105. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vampa G, et al. Plasmon-enhanced high-harmonic generation from silicon. Nat. Phys. 2017;13:659–662. doi: 10.1038/nphys4087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Imasaka K, et al. Antenna-enhanced high harmonic generation in a wide-bandgap semiconductor ZnO. Optics Express. 2018;26(16):21364. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.021364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Franz B, et al. Amplification of high harmonics in 3D semiconductor waveguides. arXiv. 2017;1709:09153v1. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Franz, B. et al. Amplification of solid high harmonics in semiconductor nanostructures, Proc. SPIE 10673, Advances in Ultrafast Condensed Phase Physics, 106730L, 10.1117/12.2306896 (29 May 2018).
  • 28.Sivis M, et al. Tailored semiconductors for high-harmonic optoelectronics. Science. 2017;357:303–306. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu H, et al. Enhanced high-harmonic generation from an all-dielectric metasurface. Nature Physics. 2018;14:1006. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0233-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shi L, et al. Self-optimization of plasmonic nanoantennas in strong femtosecond fields. Optica. 2017;4:1038–1043. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Min H, Zhizhan. X. Spontaneous scaling down of femtosecond laser‐induced apertures towards the 10‐nanometer level: the excitation of quasistatic surface plasmons. Laser & Photonics Reviews. 2014;8:633–652. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201300212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hrelescu C, et al. Selective Excitation of Individual Plasmonic Hotspots at the Tips of Single Gold Nanostars. Nano Lett. 2011;11:402–407. doi: 10.1021/nl103007m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ravasio A, et al. Single-shot diffractive imaging with a table-top femtosecond soft X-ray laser-harmonics source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:028104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.028104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gauthier D, et al. Single-shot Femtosecond X-Ray Holography Using Extended References. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:093901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.093901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rodenburg JM, Faulkner HML. A phase retrieval algorithm for shifting illumination. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004;85:4795–4797. doi: 10.1063/1.1823034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Langer F, et al. Lightwave-driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale. Nature. 2016;533:225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature17958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang, et al. The roles of photo-carrier doping and driving wavelength in high harmonic generation from a semiconductor. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1686. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01899-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vampa G, et al. Strong-field optoelectronics in solids. Nature Photonics. 2018;12(8):465–468. doi: 10.1038/s41566-018-0193-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shaaran T, Nicolas R, Iwan B, Kovacev M, Merdji H. Nano-plasmonic near field phase matching of attosecond pulses. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:6356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06491-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (983.4KB, docx)
Video (3.2MB, mp4)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES