Abstract
By using exome sequencing and a gene matching approach, we identified de novo and inherited pathogenic variants in KDM3B in 14 unrelated individuals and three affected parents with varying degrees of intellectual disability (ID) or developmental delay (DD) and short stature. The individuals share additional phenotypic features that include feeding difficulties in infancy, joint hypermobility, and characteristic facial features such as a wide mouth, a pointed chin, long ears, and a low columella. Notably, two individuals developed cancer, acute myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma, in childhood. KDM3B encodes for a histone demethylase and is involved in H3K9 demethylation, a crucial part of chromatin modification required for transcriptional regulation. We identified missense and truncating variants, suggesting that KDM3B haploinsufficiency is the underlying mechanism for this syndrome. By using a hybrid facial-recognition model, we show that individuals with a pathogenic variant in KDM3B have a facial gestalt, and that they show significant facial similarity compared to control individuals with ID. In conclusion, pathogenic variants in KDM3B cause a syndrome characterized by ID, short stature, and facial dysmorphism.
Keywords: KDM3B, intellectual disability, developmental delay, short stature, cancer predisposition, leukemia, lymphoma, facial recognition
Main Text
Intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder are neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) that occur in approximately 1%–3% of the general population.1, 2 The introduction of next-generation sequencing techniques as a diagnostic test for individuals with unexplained NDD has led to the discovery of many disease-causing mutations in genes previously unassociated with disease.3, 4, 5, 6 However, a subset of individuals remain without a diagnosis. By using trio-based exome sequencing in diagnostic or research settings as described before,5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and by collaborating via GeneMatcher,11 we identified 17 individuals with heterozygous missense and truncating variants in KDM3B (lysine-specific demethylase 3B [MIM: 609373; GenBank: NM_016604.3]; Figure 1A). All 14 different variants found were absent from the gnomAD and ExAC databases, and 13/14 had high Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion scores (CADD; scores between 13 and 40) and were predicted to be pathogenic by both the PolyPhen-2 and SIFT prediction programs (Table 1).12, 13, 14, 15 All individuals or their legal guardians gave written informed consent, and the study was given IRB approval.
Figure 1.
KDM3B Germline Variants and Amino Acid Sequence Conservation
(A) A schematic representation of KDM3B, including the zinc-finger domain, LXLL motif, and Jumonji-C domain, showing the location of the reported variants according to their position at the protein level. The gray lollipops represent the variants that were inherited from similarly affected parents. As indicated, truncating variants were identified in five individuals and missense variants in 12 individuals.
(B) A tolerance landscape plot provided by the MetaDome web server for the analysis of KDM3B. For quantifying genetic tolerance, a missense-over-synonymous ratio based on the variations reported in the gnomAD database is calculated. This ratio is computed into a tolerance landscape as a sliding window of 11 residues over the protein.30 For KDM3B, this plot shows intolerance for missense variation in and nearby the zinc-finger and Jumonji-C domains, where most of the missense mutations identified in the individuals described in this paper are located.
(C) Protein alignment of KDM3B orthologs across several species. Additionally, we aligned JMJD1C and KDM3A. These proteins show homology with KDM3B and share the same functional domains. As shown, the Trp117, Arg943, Arg1028, Asp1032, Leu1509, Tyr1544, Glu1731, and Leu1734 positions (shown in red) are evolutionarily highly conserved.
Table 1.
In Silico Analysis of KDM3B Variants Identified
| Ind. | mRNA Change | Predicted Protein Effect | Inheritance | gnomAD | PhyloP | CADD Score | PolyPhen-2 | SIFT | MetaDome Tolerancea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | c.133C>T | p.Arg45∗ | de novo | 0 | 4.08 | 38 | NA | NA | NA |
| 2 | c.277G>T | p.Glu93∗ | maternal | 0 | 4.00 | 35 | NA | NA | NA |
| 3b | c.277G>T | p.Glu93∗ | ND | 0 | 4.00 | 35 | NA | NA | NA |
| 4 | c.349T>C | p.Trp117Arg | de novo | 0 | 3.35 | 20.2 | probably damaging | deleterious | neutral |
| 5 | c.1007A>G | p.Asp336Gly | maternal | 0 | 2.06 | 13.8 | benign | deleterious | tolerant |
| 6b | c.1007A>G | p.Asp336Gly | ND | 0 | 2.06 | 13.8 | benign | deleterious | tolerant |
| 7 | c.2479C>T | p.Gln827∗ | ND | 0 | 2.79 | 33 | NA | NA | NA |
| 8 | c.2827C>T | p.Arg943Trp | de novo | 0 | 4.32 | 25.9 | probably damaging | deleterious | intolerant |
| 9 | c.2828G>A | p.Arg943Gln | de novo | 0 | 6.34 | 36 | probably damaging | deleterious | intolerant |
| 10 | c.3083G>A | p.Arg1028Gln | de novo | 0 | 6.18 | 37 | probably damaging | deleterious | highly intolerant |
| 11 | c.3095A>T | p.Asp1032Val | de novo | 0 | 4.97 | 32 | probably damaging | deleterious | highly intolerant |
| 12 | c.4526T>C | p.Leu1509Pro | de novo | 0 | 4.81 | 23.2 | probably damaging | deleterious | intolerant |
| 13 | c.4549C>T | p.Arg1517∗ | de novo | 0 | 2.55 | 40 | NA | NA | NA |
| 14 | c.4631A>G | p.Tyr1544Cys | de novo | 0 | 4.97 | 23 | probably damaging | deleterious | highly intolerant |
| 15 | c.5191G>A | p.Glu1731Lys | paternal | 0 | 6.26 | 23.5 | probably damaging | deleterious | intolerant |
| 16b | c.5191G>A | p.Glu1731Lys | ND | 0 | 6.26 | 23.5 | probably damaging | deleterious | intolerant |
| 17 | c.5201T>G | p.Leu1734Arg | de novo | 0 | 5.13 | 18 | probably damaging | deleterious | intolerant |
Abbreviations are as follows: Ind. = individual; CADD = Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion; SIFT = Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant; ND = not determined; and NA = not applicable.
The MetaDome tolerance is based on the tolerance colors of the web server MetaDome.30
Individuals 3, 6, and 16 are the mother, father, and mother of individuals 2, 5, and 15, respectively.
In ten individuals, the variants identified were confirmed to be de novo, and in three other individuals (individuals 1, 6, and 16) the variants were inherited from similarly affected parents (individuals 2, 7, and 17), summing up to 16 individuals. In one additional individual with a protein-truncating variant (individual 14), no paternal DNA was available for segregation analysis, but we confirmed that the variant was not maternally inherited. Phenotypic data for the individuals is shown in Table 2 and Table S1. The 17 individuals (9 females and 8 males) were all diagnosed with developmental delay (DD) or mild to moderate ID, although one individual (individual 14) was too young for development to be assessed. The individuals show both delayed motor and delayed speech developments, although the language delays are more pronounced. Behavior problems were noted in eight individuals: there was a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in four individuals and a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in three individuals. Notably, two individuals had a double diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder combined with ADHD. Three other individuals showed aggressive behavior, hyperactivity, and delayed social-emotional development, but they did not have formal psychiatric diagnoses. Other neurological problems included epilepsy in three individuals and childhood hypotonia in five individuals. In two out of three individuals with epilepsy, the epilepsy showed a transient character.
Table 2.
Clinical Characteristics of Individuals with KDM3B Variants
| Percentage | Number | |
|---|---|---|
| Development | ||
| Intellectual disability or developmental delay | 94.1% | 16/17a |
| Developmental delay | 23.5% | 4/17 |
| Mild disability | 47.1% | 8/17 |
| Mild to moderate or moderate disability | 23.5% | 4/17 |
| Growth | ||
| Short stature (<−2.5 SD) | 50.0% | 8/16 |
| Height <−1.5 SD | 68.8% | 11/16 |
| Neurological | ||
| Behavior problems | 53.3% | 8/15b |
| ADHD | 26.7% | 4/15 |
| Autism spectrum disorder | 20.0% | 3/15 |
| Other | 13.3% | 2/15 |
| Epilepsy | 20.0% | 3/15 |
| Childhood hypotonia | 38.5% | 5/13 |
| Congenital Anomalies | ||
| Umbilical hernia | 12.5% | 2/16 |
| Inguinal hernia | 12.5% | 2/16 |
| Cryptorchidism | 12.5% | 1/8 |
| Hypospadia | 12.5% | 1/8 |
| Congenital hip dysplasia | 6.3% | 1/16 |
| Congenital hypothyroidism | 6.3% | 1/16 |
| Diaphragmatic hernia | 12.5% | 2/16 |
| Heterotaxy | 6.3% | 1/16 |
| Interrupted inferior vena cava | 6.3% | 1/16 |
| Duodenal atresia | 6.3% | 1/16 |
| Other | ||
| Neonatal feeding difficulties | 60% | 9/15 |
| Joint hypermobility | 31.3% | 5/16 |
| Eye abnormalities | 31.3% | 5/16 |
| Hearing loss | 23.5% | 4/17 |
| Malignancy | 11.8% | 2/17 |
Abbreviations are as follows: ADHD = attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Individual 14 is still too young to determine her development.
Two individuals had double diagnoses of ADHD and autism spectrum disorder.
Eight individuals presented with short stature, defined as a height below −2.5 SD. Microcephaly was reported in one individual, whereas the others had normal head circumferences. Other recurrent features included neonatal feeding difficulties (n = 9), eye abnormalities (n = 5), hearing loss (n = 4), joint hypermobility (n = 5), and hematological malignancies (n = 2). The eye abnormalities consisted of ocular movement disorders such as nystagmus and strabismus in four individuals and refraction anomalies and low vision in three individuals. Furthermore, the individuals displayed a wide range of congenital anomalies, including umbilical and inguinal hernias, cryptorchidism, hypospadia, ventricular septal defect, interrupted inferior vena cava, diaphragmatic hernia, heterotaxy, duodenal atresia, pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis, and congenital hip dysplasia. With the exception of the umbilical hernia, the inguinal hernia, and the diaphragmatic hernia (all three present in two individuals), none of the congenital anomalies were recurrent in multiple individuals. No clear genotype-phenotype correlation could be observed. Shared facial characteristics in the majority of the individuals were long ears (n = 9), a broad nasal tip (n = 14), a low-hanging columella (n = 6), a wide mouth (n = 12), a thin upper lip vermillion (n = 12), and a pointed chin (n = 12), as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Facial Characteristics of Individuals Carrying Germline Variants in KDM3B
Presented are frontal and lateral photographs of 10 of the 17 individuals with a variant in KDM3B. Shared facial characteristics include long ears, a prominent nasal tip, a low columella, a thin upper lip, a broad mouth, and a prominent chin.
On the basis of these shared dysmorphic features, we hypothesized that facial recognition software would be able to detect common facial features in individuals with missense and truncating variants in KDM3B. Facial recognition software is able to objectively detect subtle features which might be difficult to identify by eye.16, 17, 18 In the past, facial recognition software has been used to objectively measure dysmorphic features in individuals with various syndromes.17, 18, 19 We collected and analyzed photographs of 13 out of 14 children. The three affected parents were deliberately excluded to avoid a bias caused by facial features that were shared with their children and unrelated to the variant identified. To determine whether a facial gestalt is present in individuals with a variant in KDM3B, we used a hybrid model recently developed and described by van der Donk et al.20 This hybrid model combines the output of two computer vision algorithms: Clinical Face Phenotype Space (CFPS)21 and OpenFace.22 In this hybrid method, the resulting two output feature vectors from these algorithms are combined, giving a 468-dimensional hybrid feature vector that represents the facial features of an individual. Because the CFPS and OpenFace algorithms were trained to recognize dysmorphic features and general facial features, respectively, both algorithms recognize different facial characteristics, and the combined hybrid model uses both of these different feature types to improve the distinction between subtle differences in these dysmorphic features (details in van der Donk et al.20).
To determine the similarity between individuals with a variant in KDM3B versus a control population consisting of 130 individuals with other ID-syndromes, we calculated the clustering improvement factors (CIFs), which give an estimate of search space reduction.21 In brief, the CIF estimates how a group of affected individuals cluster within a group of controls and compares that clustering to what is expected by random chance. For each individual, ten ID-affected controls that were matched for age, gender, and ethnicity were selected. We used ID-affected controls instead of healthy control individuals so that we could determine whether we are able to distinguish individuals with a variant in KDM3B from the general ID-affected population.
We performed a permutation test by randomly labeling 10,000 case-control series within our dataset. Subsequently, we calculated the corresponding CIFs for each permutation by using the hybrid model, and we used right-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests to determine whether the CIF for the KDM3B individuals was significantly higher than expected based on random chance. By using this approach, we were able to demonstrate that there is a significant similarity between the faces of individuals with a germline variant in KDM3B when compared to the general ID population (CIF = 2.5962; p = 0.0054; Figure 3). This strongly suggests that the individuals with a variant in KDM3B have a facial gestalt, and that the computational analysis of facial dysmorphisms can be used to delineate this genetic entity. In the future, when combined with other phenotypic and genetic information, this hybrid facial recognition model might be useful for classifying individuals with variants of unknown significance (VUSs) in KDM3B.
Figure 3.
t-SNE Plots Showing the Distribution of 13 Individuals with a Germline Variant in KDM3B Versus Controls with Intellectual Disability
t-distributed stochastic neighbor embeddings (t-SNE) plots visualize the distribution of the hybrid feature vectors for both individuals and controls. Relative clustering of individuals with a germline variant in KDM3B suggests that this group of individuals with intellectual disability (ID) shows more similarity in facial features than is expected by chance. The control group is matched with the KDM3B-mutated group for gender, ethnicity, and age.
KDM3B is part of an important group comprising the histone lysine methylases (KMTs) and histone lysine demethylases (KDMs). This group of proteins is involved in gene regulation and expression.23 Several of these genes have already been associated with NDDs; for example, KMT2D (MIM: 602113) is associated with Kabuki syndrome 1 (MIM: 147920 24)], and KDM6A (MIM: 300128) is associated with Kabuki syndrome 2 (MIM: 300867 25). In addition, germline variants in the H3K9 demethylase JMJD1C (MIM: 604503), which is a gene that shows large regions of homology with KDM3B, are found in individuals with intracranial germ cell tumors and with NDDs.26, 27 Rare de novo KDM3B variants (c.4216C>T [p.Arg1406Trp]28 and c.2624del [p.Leu875Argfs∗8])4 have been reported in two individuals with schizophrenia and ID, respectively. However, the associated phenotypes have not been fully reported, nor was the causality of these variants confirmed. None of the individuals presented in this study showed signs of schizophrenia.
Faundes et al. recently published an overview of all KMTs and KDMs associated with disease, and they showed that in these genes, variants resulting in developmental disorders mostly exert their effect through haploinsufficiency.23 We identified nonsense variants in five individuals (Table 1), implying that haploinsufficiency is the most likely mechanism of disease in our individuals as well. Furthermore, in this paper by Faundes et al., KDM3B is among the genes suggested as candidate genes for NDDs on the basis of the high probability of loss-of-function intolerance (pLI) score of 1.00 in the ExAC database. Additionally, in ExAC a Z score of 4.99 was reported, demonstrating a selection against missense variants.
Besides these five individuals with nonsense variants, there were 12 individuals who carried missense variants in KDM3B. Notably, two individuals carried missense variants affecting the same amino-acid; these variants were c.2827C>T (p.Arg943Trp) in individual 8 and c.2828G>A (p.Arg943Gln) in individual 9. All missense variants affect residues that are evolutionarily highly conserved across other species (Table 1). To further determine the effect of the missense variants identified, we used the MetaDome web server to generate a tolerance landscape of KDM3B (Figure 1B).30 This server uses the gnomAD database to calculate a missense-over-synonymous ratio as a sliding window over the protein. This ratio is then expressed as a tolerance landscape. Herewith, we showed that the Arg943, Leu1509, Glu1731, and Leu1734 variants are located in regions intolerant for missense variation, and the regions surrounding the amino acids Asp1028, Asp1032, and Tyr1544 are highly intolerant regions for missense variation (Table 1). The localization of these variants in intolerant and highly intolerant regions of the gene contributes to the evidence that these variants are pathogenic; it has been described before that variants in gene regions that are depleted of missense variation are more likely to underlie disease.31 According to the MetaDome tolerance landscape, the regions where the Trp117 and Asp336 variants are localized are neutral and tolerant, respectively, meaning that missense variation in these regions is less rare. However, the facial recognition software showed that the faces of the individuals with these two variants do show significant similarity with those of the other individuals. We consider the Trp117 and Asp336 variants as VUSs that require further study.
Additionally, we show that the mutated amino acids in the affected individuals are conserved across the other KDM3 family members, KDM3A (MIM: 611512) and JMJD1C (Figure 1C); this conservation highlights the potential importance of these specific amino acids. Moreover, the variants clustered within or near two functional domains: the zinc-finger and Jumonji-C domains (Figures 1A and 1C).29 The Jumonji-C domain in KDM3B is responsible for the demethylation of histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9), and it is a highly conserved domain that has ∼64% overall amino acid similarity among KDM3 subfamily members.29, 32, 33
Furthermore, because KDM3B is involved in the demethylation of H3K9, we assessed the mono- and tri-methylation status of H3K9 in HEK293 cells that were overexpressing wild-type and missense mutants of KDM3B, but these experiments were inconclusive due to large variability in expression levels (data not shown). Therefore, the functional impact of the missense variants identified remains to be clarified.
This disorder caused by germline variants in KDM3B appears to be characterized by a variable clinical presentation. Short stature (<−2.5 SD) was observed in eight individuals (50.0%). Remarkably, kdm3b-knockout mice present with a somatic growth restriction, possibly explained by decreased concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1).34 As low IGF1 levels can be indicative of growth-hormone deficiency, this might be an explanation for the short stature observed in the individuals with a variant in KDM3B. IGF1 levels and growth hormone status were not routinely tested in the individuals described in this paper, but one child (individual 13) was found to have isolated growth-hormone deficiency. Also, it is hypothesized by Faundes et al.23 that variants in genes promoting transcriptional activity appear to cause growth retardation, whereas overgrowth results from variants in transcriptional repressors such as NSD1 (MIM: 606681) and EZH2 (MIM: 601573). Because methylation of H3K9 is generally considered to be a repressive mark, demethylation of H3K9 by KDM3B is predicted to result in the activation of transcription and thus might explain subsequent growth retardation. Another feature shown by kdm3b-knockout mice is subfertility in male mice.35 In accordance, oligospermia was diagnosed in individual 16.
Two individuals were diagnosed with childhood cancer: acute myeloid leukemia at age 13 in individual 2 and Hodgkin lymphoma at age 17 in individual 11. In individual 2, we excluded loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) of the germline variant and the possibility of a second hit variant in KDM3B. These individuals have been described previously in a study focusing on genetic predisposition for childhood cancer. In this study, we performed exome sequencing on children with cancer and additional features pointing toward genetic predisposition.36 Interestingly, many syndromes, such as Weaver syndrome (MIM: 277590),37, 38 Rubinstein Taybi syndrome (MIM: 180849),39, 40 and Sotos syndrome (MIM: 117550),41, 42 caused by variants in other chromatin-remodeling genes have been described to cause both ID and a mildly increased risk of cancer. Because only two out of 17 individuals in our cohort developed cancer, and both were recruited through a childhood cancer predisposition study36 (introducing an ascertainment bias), it is unclear whether the variants in KDM3B are causative of the cancer in these children. However, there are several clues linking variants in KDM3B to cancer predisposition. For example, somatic variants in KDM3B have been described in different cancer types,43, 44 and several studies link KDM3B alterations to defects and malignancies in the hematopoietic system.32, 45, 46, 47 Particularly interesting is the fact that kdm3b-knockout mice show defects in the hematopoietic system, consistent with myelodysplastic syndrome.48 Together, these facts suggest that KDM3B might play a role in the development of hematopoietic malignancies. However, the assessment of larger cohorts of KDM3B-mutated individuals is required to establish whether the incidence of (hematologic) malignancies is indeed enriched in these individuals. On the basis of the current findings, we would not advise screening for malignancies, although vigilance is warranted.
In conclusion, by using exome sequencing we identified 17 individuals with germline, pathogenic variants in KDM3B. We show that both de novo and inherited variants in KDM3B cause a syndrome hallmarked by DD or mild to moderate ID, short stature, and feeding difficulties in infancy. By performing analysis of photographs of the affected individuals with a hybrid facial recognition model, we showed that individuals with a variant in KDM3B significantly cluster within a group of ID-affected individuals and thus show a facial gestalt. This model can be used in the future to delineate genetic entities and determine the pathogenicity of VUSs.
Declaration of Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
I.J.D. was funded by the KiKa Foundation (project number 127). V.H. is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) NICHHD R01 HD078592. E.W. was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (KUN2012-5366). B.C. is a senior clinical investigator of the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders. This work was partly supported by a research grant from the Research Foundation, Flanders: G028415N to B.C.. We thank Carol Saunders and Laura Cross for their contributions.
Published: March 28, 2019
Footnotes
Supplemental Data can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.02.023.
Web Resources
Clinical Face Phenotype Space, https://github.com/ChristofferNellaker/Clinical_Face_Phenotype_Space_Pipeline
ExAC Browser, v.0.3.1., http://exac.broadinstitute.org
GenBank, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/
GeneMatcher, https://genematcher.org
gnomAD Browser, v.r2.0.2., https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org
MetaDome, https://stuart.radboudumc.nl/metadome/
OMIM, http://www.omim.org
OpenFace, https://cmusatyalab.github.io/openface/
Supplemental Data
References
- 1.Maulik P.K., Mascarenhas M.N., Mathers C.D., Dua T., Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2011;32:419–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ropers H.H. Genetics of early onset cognitive impairment. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2010;11:161–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Deciphering Developmental Disorders S., Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature. 2015;519:223–228. doi: 10.1038/nature14135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deciphering Developmental Disorders S., Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature. 2017;542:433–438. doi: 10.1038/nature21062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Ligt J., Willemsen M.H., van Bon B.W., Kleefstra T., Yntema H.G., Kroes T., Vulto-van Silfhout A.T., Koolen D.A., de Vries P., Gilissen C. Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1921–1929. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vissers L.E., de Ligt J., Gilissen C., Janssen I., Steehouwer M., de Vries P., van Lier B., Arts P., Wieskamp N., del Rosario M. A de novo paradigm for mental retardation. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:1109–1112. doi: 10.1038/ng.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.de Bruin C., Mericq V., Andrew S.F., van Duyvenvoorde H.A., Verkaik N.S., Losekoot M., Porollo A., Garcia H., Kuang Y., Hanson D. An XRCC4 splice mutation associated with severe short stature, gonadal failure, and early-onset metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;100:E789–E798. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rauch A., Wieczorek D., Graf E., Wieland T., Endele S., Schwarzmayr T., Albrecht B., Bartholdi D., Beygo J., Di Donato N. Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: An exome sequencing study. Lancet. 2012;380:1674–1682. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61480-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thiffault I., Cadieux-Dion M., Farrow E., Caylor R., Miller N., Soden S., Saunders C. On the verge of diagnosis: Detection, reporting, and investigation of de novo variants in novel genes identified by clinical sequencing. Hum. Mutat. 2018;39:1505–1516. doi: 10.1002/humu.23646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Soden S.E., Saunders C.J., Willig L.K., Farrow E.G., Smith L.D., Petrikin J.E., LePichon J.B., Miller N.A., Thiffault I., Dinwiddie D.L. Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:265ra168. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sobreira N., Schiettecatte F., Valle D., Hamosh A. GeneMatcher: A matching tool for connecting investigators with an interest in the same gene. Hum. Mutat. 2015;36:928–930. doi: 10.1002/humu.22844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lek M., Karczewski K.J., Minikel E.V., Samocha K.E., Banks E., Fennell T., O’Donnell-Luria A.H., Ware J.S., Hill A.J., Cummings B.B., Exome Aggregation Consortium Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–291. doi: 10.1038/nature19057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Adzhubei I.A., Schmidt S., Peshkin L., Ramensky V.E., Gerasimova A., Bork P., Kondrashov A.S., Sunyaev S.R. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kircher M., Witten D.M., Jain P., O’Roak B.J., Cooper G.M., Shendure J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:310–315. doi: 10.1038/ng.2892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar P., Henikoff S., Ng P.C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boehringer S., Guenther M., Sinigerova S., Wurtz R.P., Horsthemke B., Wieczorek D. Automated syndrome detection in a set of clinical facial photographs. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2011;155A:2161–2169. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dudding-Byth T., Baxter A., Holliday E.G., Hackett A., O’Donnell S., White S.M., Attia J., Brunner H., de Vries B., Koolen D. Computer face-matching technology using two-dimensional photographs accurately matches the facial gestalt of unrelated individuals with the same syndromic form of intellectual disability. BMC Biotechnol. 2017;17:90. doi: 10.1186/s12896-017-0410-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hammond P., Hutton T.J., Allanson J.E., Buxton B., Campbell L.E., Clayton-Smith J., Donnai D., Karmiloff-Smith A., Metcalfe K., Murphy K.C. Discriminating power of localized three-dimensional facial morphology. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;77:999–1010. doi: 10.1086/498396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boehringer S., Vollmar T., Tasse C., Wurtz R.P., Gillessen-Kaesbach G., Horsthemke B., Wieczorek D. Syndrome identification based on 2D analysis software. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006;14:1082–1089. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.van der Donk R., Jansen S., Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J.H.M., Koolen D.A., Goltstein L., Hoischen A., Brunner H.G., Kemmeren P., Nellaker C., Vissers L. Next-generation phenotyping using computer vision algorithms in rare genomic neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet. Med. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0404-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferry Q., Steinberg J., Webber C., FitzPatrick D.R., Ponting C.P., Zisserman A., Nellåker C. Diagnostically relevant facial gestalt information from ordinary photos. eLife. 2014;3:e02020. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amos B., Ludwiczuk B., Satyanarayanan M. CMU School of Computer Science; 2016. Openface: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Faundes V., Newman W.G., Bernardini L., Canham N., Clayton-Smith J., Dallapiccola B., Davies S.J., Demos M.K., Goldman A., Gill H. Histone lysine methylases and demethylases in the landscape of human developmental disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;102:175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ng S.B., Bigham A.W., Buckingham K.J., Hannibal M.C., McMillin M.J., Gildersleeve H.I., Beck A.E., Tabor H.K., Cooper G.M., Mefford H.C. Exome sequencing identifies MLL2 mutations as a cause of Kabuki syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:790–793. doi: 10.1038/ng.646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lederer D., Grisart B., Digilio M.C., Benoit V., Crespin M., Ghariani S.C., Maystadt I., Dallapiccola B., Verellen-Dumoulin C. Deletion of KDM6A, a histone demethylase interacting with MLL2, in three patients with Kabuki syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;90:119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saez M.A., Fernandez-Rodriguez J., Moutinho C., Sanchez-Mut J.V., Gomez A., Vidal E., Petazzi P., Szczesna K., Lopez-Serra P., Lucariello M. Mutations in JMJD1C are involved in Rett syndrome and intellectual disability. Genet. Med. 2016;18:378–385. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang L., Yamaguchi S., Burstein M.D., Terashima K., Chang K., Ng H.K., Nakamura H., He Z., Doddapaneni H., Lewis L. Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature. 2014;511:241–245. doi: 10.1038/nature13296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guipponi M., Santoni F.A., Setola V., Gehrig C., Rotharmel M., Cuenca M., Guillin O., Dikeos D., Georgantopoulos G., Papadimitriou G. Exome sequencing in 53 sporadic cases of schizophrenia identifies 18 putative candidate genes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brauchle M., Yao Z., Arora R., Thigale S., Clay I., Inverardi B., Fletcher J., Taslimi P., Acker M.G., Gerrits B. Protein complex interactor analysis and differential activity of KDM3 subfamily members towards H3K9 methylation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wiel L., Baakman C., Gilissen D., Veltman J.A., Vriend G., Gilissen C. MetaDome: Pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains. bioRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1002/humu.23798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ge X., Gong H., Dumas K., Litwin J., Phillips J.J., Waisfisz Q., Weiss M.M., Hendriks Y., Stuurman K.E., Nelson S.F. Missense-depleted regions in population exomes implicate ras superfamily nucleotide-binding protein alteration in patients with brain malformation. NPJ Genom. Med. 2016;1 doi: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim J.Y., Kim K.B., Eom G.H., Choe N., Kee H.J., Son H.J., Oh S.T., Kim D.W., Pak J.H., Baek H.J. KDM3B is the H3K9 demethylase involved in transcriptional activation of lmo2 in leukemia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012;32:2917–2933. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00133-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim S.M., Kim J.Y., Choe N.W., Cho I.H., Kim J.R., Kim D.W., Seol J.E., Lee S.E., Kook H., Nam K.I. Regulation of mouse steroidogenesis by WHISTLE and JMJD1C through histone methylation balance. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:6389–6403. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu Z., Chen X., Zhou S., Liao L., Jiang R., Xu J. The histone H3K9 demethylase Kdm3b is required for somatic growth and female reproductive function. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015;11:494–507. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.11849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu Z., Oyola M.G., Zhou S., Chen X., Liao L., Tien J.C., Mani S.K., Xu J. Knockout of the histone demethylase Kdm3b decreases spermatogenesis and impairs male sexual behaviors. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015;11:1447–1457. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.13795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Diets I.J., Waanders E., Ligtenberg M.J., van Bladel D.A.G., Kamping E.J., Hoogerbrugge P.M., Hopman S., Olderode-Berends M.J., Gerkes E.H., Koolen D.A. High yield of pathogenic germline mutations causative or likely causative of the cancer phenotype in selected children with cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:1594–1603. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tatton-Brown K., Murray A., Hanks S., Douglas J., Armstrong R., Banka S., Bird L.M., Clericuzio C.L., Cormier-Daire V., Cushing T., Childhood Overgrowth Consortium Weaver syndrome and EZH2 mutations: Clarifying the clinical phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2013;161A:2972–2980. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Usemann J., Ernst T., Schäfer V., Lehmberg K., Seeger K. EZH2 mutation in an adolescent with Weaver syndrome developing acute myeloid leukemia and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2016;170A:1274–1277. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bourdeaut F., Miquel C., Richer W., Grill J., Zerah M., Grison C., Pierron G., Amiel J., Krucker C., Radvanyi F. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome predisposing to non-WNT, non-SHH, group 3 medulloblastoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 2014;61:383–386. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.de Kort E., Conneman N., Diderich K. A case of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and congenital neuroblastoma. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2014;164A:1332–1333. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tatton-Brown K., Douglas J., Coleman K., Baujat G., Cole T.R., Das S., Horn D., Hughes H.E., Temple I.K., Faravelli F., Childhood Overgrowth Collaboration Genotype-phenotype associations in Sotos syndrome: an analysis of 266 individuals with NSD1 aberrations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;77:193–204. doi: 10.1086/432082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Villani A., Greer M.C., Kalish J.M., Nakagawara A., Nathanson K.L., Pajtler K.W., Pfister S.M., Walsh M.F., Wasserman J.D., Zelley K. Recommendations for cancer surveillance in individuals with RASopathies and other rare genetic conditions with increased cancer risk. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:e83–e90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Forbes S.A., Beare D., Boutselakis H., Bamford S., Bindal N., Tate J., Cole C.G., Ward S., Dawson E., Ponting L. COSMIC: Somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D777–D783. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Paolicchi E., Crea F., Farrar W.L., Green J.E., Danesi R. Histone lysine demethylases in breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2013;86:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xu X., Nagel S., Quentmeier H., Wang Z., Pommerenke C., Dirks W.G., Macleod R.A.F., Drexler H.G., Hu Z. KDM3B shows tumor-suppressive activity and transcriptionally regulates HOXA1 through retinoic acid response elements in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2018;59:204–213. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1324156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hu Z., Gomes I., Horrigan S.K., Kravarusic J., Mar B., Arbieva Z., Chyna B., Fulton N., Edassery S., Raza A., Westbrook C.A. A novel nuclear protein, 5qNCA (LOC51780) is a candidate for the myeloid leukemia tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 5 band q31. Oncogene. 2001;20:6946–6954. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.MacKinnon R.N., Kannourakis G., Wall M., Campbell L.J. A cryptic deletion in 5q31.2 provides further evidence for a minimally deleted region in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Genet. 2011;204:187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li S., Ali S., Duan X., Liu S., Du J., Liu C., Dai H., Zhou M., Zhou L., Yang L. JMJD1B demethylates H4R3me2s and H3K9me2 to facilitate gene expression for development of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Rep. 2018;23:389–403. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



