Skip to main content
International Journal of Women's Dermatology logoLink to International Journal of Women's Dermatology
. 2019 Jan 14;5(2):129–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.022

Staphylococcus lugdunensis abscess with deep tissue involvement☆☆

Reid Waldman 1, Andrew Kelsey 1,
PMCID: PMC6451748  PMID: 30997388

Introduction

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci are commonly found on human skin (Heldt Manica and Cohen, 2017, Zaaroura et al., 2018). However, one coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, has been increasingly recognized for its virulence and propensity to cause locally destructive skin and soft tissue infections in immuno-compromised hosts (Arias et al., 2010, Zaaroura et al., 2018). Despite this, S. lugdunensis is not frequently discussed in the dermatology literature, and recommendations with regard to the management of skin and soft tissue infections caused by this organism are lacking.

Herein, we present a case of a large, suppurative, cutaneous, and soft-tissue abscess with deep muscle invasion due to S. lugdunensis to highlight the pathogenicity of this organism. We provide an evaluation and treatment recommendations for those who encounter this microbe as a cause of skin and soft-tissue infections in clinical practice.

Case

A 68-year old male patient presented to the dermatology clinic for evaluation and treatment of a draining lesion on the lower back that had been progressively growing in size over the previous 2 weeks. The patient was unable to identify any inciting factors and denied recent trauma to the area. On examination, the patient had a 5.5 × 4 cm fluctuant subcutaneous abscess on the left lower back that was actively draining purulent fluid from an overlying ostium. The surrounding tissue was woody and indurated on palpation.

Due to concern for underlying malignancy and the possibility of deep extension of an abscess, a computed tomography (CT) scan was obtained. Key images (Fig. 1) from the CT scan show a 44.4 × 30.6 × 53.7 mm soft-tissue mass extending from the skin surface into the trapezius muscle. There is a central hypodensity and diffuse inflammatory changes most consistent with an infectious process, such as an abscess. The patient was initiated on doxycycline 100 mg twice daily and returned to the clinic 1 week later without significant improvement.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Computed tomography scan with intravenous contrast, showing (A transverse, B sagittal) a subcutaneous soft-tissue mass in the posterior left back that measures 5.4 × 3.0 × 4.4 cm. The center is hypodense, and inflammatory changes surround the mass. The mass extends from the skin into the lower trapezius muscle without underlying bone involvement.

Incision and drainage was performed at that time, and bacterial cultures were collected from a sample of the purulent abscess drainage. The bacterial culture isolated S. lugdunensis that was sensitive to doxycycline. Considering the severity of the patient’s initial presentation and the prevalence of S. lugdunensis infections among immuno-compromised hosts, the patient underwent laboratory evaluation for underlying immunodeficiency, including testing for HIV, quantitative immunoglobulins, and hemoglobin A1C, all of which failed to reveal an underlying cause for immunosuppression.

The patient resumed doxycycline for 2 additional weeks with resolution of the abscess. The patient was encouraged to undergo age-appropriate malignancy screening as directed by his primary medical doctor.

Discussion

S. lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative Staphylococci that can cause locally destructive skin and soft-tissue infections much like S. aureus (Lambe et al., 1990, Schnitzler et al., 1998, Vandenesch et al., 1993a, Vandenesch et al., 1993b, van der Mee-Marquet et al., 2003, Zaaroura et al., 2018). This species of Staphylococcus was first isolated in human subjects in 1988 by Freney et al and has since been recognized as pathogenic for a variety of infections, including infective endocarditis, cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infection, and central line–associated bloodstream infection (Zaaroura et al., 2018).

S. lugdunensis comprises 5% to 6% of the coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species isolated from skin infection cultures (Akiyama et al., 1998). It is most frequently identified in women, postoperatively, in immunocompromised patients, in the setting of underlying malignancy, and in diabetic patients (Bellamy and Barkham, 2002, Herchline and Ayers, 1991). Several studies have demonstrated that abscesses and wound infections are the most common infections caused by S. lugdunensis and that these infections occur most frequently overlying the breast and the perineal and inguinal regions (Arias et al., 2010, Böcher et al., 2009, Heldt Manica and Cohen, 2017). Furthermore, S. lugdunensis has also been isolated from cultures of superficial skin infections, including folliculitis and cutaneous pustulosis, and from abscesses in individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa (Zaaroura et al., 2018).

Conclusions

Ultimately, recognition of S. lugdunensis as a cause of skin and soft-tissue infections is important to dermatologists for the following reasons: 1) S. lugdunensis is not always contaminant or commensal despite being a coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species; 2) although the number of reports on methicillin-resistant S. lugdunensis are increasing and may result in treatment failure in rare cases, the majority of isolates are pan-sensitive to antibiotics that are frequently used for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections (eg, cephalexin and doxycycline); 3) in critically ill patients, S. lugdunensis skin infections may result from bacterial seeding secondary to serious underlying pathology, such as infective endocarditis or central line-associated bloodstream infection; and 4) S. lugdunensis commonly occurs in the setting of diabetes, underlying malignancy, or underlying immunocompromised states; therefore, an evaluation for diabetes, HIV, common variable immunodeficiency, and underlying malignancy is recommended when appropriate clinical suspicion and severity of infection exists (Choi et al., 2010, Fleurette et al., 1989, Goldstein et al., 2006, Higaki et al., 1999, Kragsbjerg et al., 2000, Mateo et al., 2005, Vandenesch et al., 1993b).

Footnotes

Funding sources: None.

☆☆

Conflicts of interest: None.

References

  1. Akiyama H., Kanzaki H., Tada J., Arata J. Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from various skin lesions. J Dermatol. 1998;25(9):563–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1998.tb02459.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arias M., Tena D., Apellániz M., Asensio M.P., Caballero P., Hernández C. Skin and soft tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis: Report of 20 cases. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42(11-12):879–884. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2010.509332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellamy R., Barkham T. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infection sites: Predominance of abscesses in the pelvic girdle region. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(3):e32–e34. doi: 10.1086/341304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Böcher S., Tønning B., Skov R.L., Prag J. Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections in the community. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(4):946–950. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01024-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi S.H., Chung J.W., Lee E.J., Kim T.H., Lee M.S., Kang J.M. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(9):3346–3349. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00609-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fleurette J., Bès M., Brun Y., Freney J., Forey F., Coulet M. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and S. schleiferi: Bacteriological characteristics and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Res Microbiol. 1989;140(2):107–118. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein E.J.C., Citron D.M., Merriam C.V., Warren Y.A., Tyrrell K.L., Fernandez H.T. In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against aerobic and anaerobic strains isolated from diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(11):3959–3962. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00722-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heldt Manica L.A., Cohen P.R. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infections of the skin and soft tissue: A case series and review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2017;7(4):555–562. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0202-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herchline T.E., Ayers L.W. Occurrence of Staphylococcus lugdunensis in consecutive clinical cultures and relationship of isolation to infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(3):419–421. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.419-421.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Higaki S., Kitagawa T., Morohashi M., Yamagishi T. Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci from skin lesions. J Int Med Res. 1999;27(4):191–195. doi: 10.1177/030006059902700406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kragsbjerg P., Bomfim-Loogna J., Tornqvist E., Söderquist B. Development of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus lugdunensis during treatment—report of a case of bacterial arthritis, vertebral osteomyelitis and infective endocarditis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000;6(9):496–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lambe D.W., Ferguson K.P., Keplinger J.L., Gemmell C.G., Kalbfleisch J.H. Pathogenicity of Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus schleiferi, and three other coagulase-negative staphylococci in a mouse model and possible virulence factors. Can J Microbiol. 1990;36(7):455–463. doi: 10.1139/m90-080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mateo M., Maestre J.R., Aguilar L., Cafini F., Puente P., Sánchez P. Genotypic versus phenotypic characterization, with respect to susceptibility and identification, of 17 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(2):287–291. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schnitzler N., Meilicke R., Conrads G., Frank D., Haase G. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: Report of a case of peritonitis and an easy-to-perform screening strategy. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(3):812–813. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.3.812-813.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van der Mee-Marquet N., Achard A., Mereghetti L., Danton A., Minier M., Quentin R. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infections: High frequency of inguinal area carriage. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(4):1404–1409. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1404-1409.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vandenesch F., Projan S.J., Kreiswirth B., Etienne J., Novick R.P. Age-related sequences in Staphylococcus lugdunensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;111(1):115–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vandenesch F., Etienne J., Reverdy M.E., Eykyn S.J. Endocarditis due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis: Report of 11 cases and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17(5):871–876. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.5.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zaaroura H., Geffen Y., Bergman R., Avitan-Hersh E. Clinical and microbiological properties of Staphylococcus lugdunensis skin infections. J Dermatol. 2018;45(8):994–999. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Women's Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES