Skip to main content
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science logoLink to The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
. 2019 Jan 22;81(3):369–372. doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0491

mRNA expression of tumor-associated genes in canine grade I meningiomas

Ken OKABAYASHI 1, Takanori NARITA 1,*, Saki TAKASHIRO 1, Sawako NADAOKA 1, Shuichiro KANAI 1, Daisuke ITO 1, Masato KITAGAWA 1
PMCID: PMC6451920  PMID: 30674739

Abstract

This study was undertaken to establish a method for measuring mRNA expression by using real-time RT-PCR in the diagnosis of canine meningiomas. When performing real-time RT-PCR, it is essential to include appropriate control tissues and to select appropriate housekeeping genes as an internal standard. Based on the results of our study, RPS18 constitutes a suitable internal standard for the comparison of mRNA expression between normal meninges and meningiomas. The results showed increased mRNA expression of VEGFA and EGFR; however, mRNA expression of KDR was reduced. Measuring mRNA expression by using real-time RT-PCR with appropriate control tissues and internal standards can provide useful information to understanding the pathogenesis of canine meningiomas, which corresponds with immunohistochemical findings.

Keywords: canine meningioma, housekeeping genes, real-time RT-PCR, tumor-associated genes


Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors in dogs [16]. Based on the histopathological features, meningiomas are categorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) into two major groups: benign slow-growing tumors (meningothelial, fibrous, transitional, angiomatous, papillary, granular, and myxoid) and faster-growing anaplastic tumors [9]. Meningiomas are also divided into three grades: grade I, benign; grade II, atypical with intermediate histological features; and grade III, malignant [7].

Overexpression of growth factor associated genes, such as those for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor (VEGFR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), has been reported in canine meningiomas [3]. Increased VEGF expression has been reported in canine meningiomas and is associated with a higher proliferative index and poorer prognosis [4, 10, 13].

Immunohistochemical examination is required to demonstrate the existence of tumor-associated factors in human and canine brain tumors [2, 8, 12]. Although some institutions perform biopsies of brain tumors in dogs, it is more difficult to examine small biopsy samples. Examination of mRNA expression could provide information corresponding to the immunohistochemical findings. Real-time RT-PCR requires a small amount of a specimen, a short time to perform, and minimal skills; its advantage is that it can be used to measure mRNA expression, particularly in brain tumors. It is very important during the performance of real-time RT-PCR to have appropriate control tissues and to select appropriate housekeeping genes as an internal standard in order to measure mRNA expression accurately.

In this study, the mRNA expression in canine samples was examined. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-actin (ACTB), TATA-binding protein (TBP), and ribosomal protein S18 (RPS18) served as housekeeping genes. VEGFA, kinase insert domain-containing receptor (KDR) (also called VEGFR-2), EGFR, and PDGFRA were the target genes. The aim of this study was to understand the pathogenesis of canine meningioma by measuring accurate mRNA expression of tumor-associated genes compared with appropriate control tissue and internal standard.

Lesional tissue samples were obtained from 14 clinical cases of grade I meningioma (meningothelial meningioma, 1; fibrous meningioma, 7; transitional meningioma, 3; and psammomatous meningioma, 3) that presented to the Nihon University Animal Medical Center between 2011 and 2014. The dogs were of various breeds, sex, and age, and all of them were aged over 8 years. Control tissue samples (7 samples of normal meninges and 7 samples of normal cerebral white matter) were obtained from 5 euthanized beagle dogs. All experiments were approved by the Nihon University Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted in accordance with their guidelines. All samples were stored at −80°C immediately after the surgical resection or autopsy until total RNA extraction was performed. Total RNAs were extracted from the samples using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies Co., Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using 500 ng of total RNA with a PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan). Real-time RT-PCRs were performed using 2 µl of the first-strand cDNA in 25 µl of the total reaction volume and SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara Bio Inc.). PCRs were conducted using the Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System II TP900 (Takara Bio Inc.). The PCR reactions consisted of 1 cycle of denaturing at 95°C for 5 sec and annealing and extension at 60°C for 30 sec. Results were analyzed using the second derivative method and the comparative cycle threshold method using version 5.11B of the software (Takara Bio Inc.) of the instrument. The primers for the housekeeping genes and for the target genes are shown in Table 1. To determine the appropriate internal standard in this study, quantitative real-time RT-PCR for housekeeping genes was performed using cDNAs made from equivalent amounts of total RNA extracted from normal cerebral white matters, normal meninges, and meningiomas. Subsequently, the cycle threshold (Ct) values for all tissues were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Furthermore, the Ct values of housekeeping genes in normal meninges and menigiomas were examined using BestKeeper (https://www.gene-quantification.de/bestkeeper.html) and NormFinder (https://moma.dk/normfinder-software) softwares for determination of stable housekeeping genes [1, 11]. The housekeeping gene with the lower standard deviation of Ct values and with the values of Pearson correlation coefficient close to 1.0 in BestKeeper, or with 0.5 or less of the stability values in NormFinder could be suitable as internal standards. Relative mRNA expressions of the target genes were calculated using the comparative (ΔΔCt) method based on the values for the appropriate housekeeping genes and the mean values for normal meninges. The relative mRNA expressions were compared between the meningiomas and the normal meninges by using the Mann-Whitney test.

Table 1. Primer sequences.

Gene Primer sequence Length (bp)
GAPDH Forward: TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA 150
Reverse: TTGATGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG

ACTB Forward: CGCAAGTACTCTGTGTGGATTGG´ 118
Reverse: ATTTGCGGTGGACGATGGA

TBP Forward: ATGGTGTGTACGGGAGCCAAG 184
Reverse: ACTGTTGGTGGGTCAGCACAAG

RPS18 Forward: ATAGCCTTTGCCATCACAGCAATTA 86
Reverse: TTGGTGAGATCGATGTCTGCTTTC

VEGFA Forward: TCAGGACACTGCTGTACTTTGAGG 133
Reverse: GGCTTGTCAGGAGCAAGTGAA

KDR Forward: CTTGGACAGCATCACCAGTAGTCAG 131
Reverse: TGAGATGCTCCAAGGTCAGGAA

EGFR Forward: GAAAGCTTGACCAAGCAAGCAC 89
Reverse: ACGGGACAGTACGTTAAGATGAACA

PDGFRA Forward: GTCACATTCATCCAAACCGTCAA 136
Reverse: ACCTGCCAGGAGCACGTACA

The amplicons of the target genes and housekeeping genes, except for GAPDH, showed a single peak and a single band in the dissociation curve and in the agarose gel electrophoresis. GAPDH was excluded for inappropriate amplification. The Ct values for ACTB, RPS18, and TBP in the normal cerebral white matter, normal meninges, and meningiomas are shown in Fig. 1. The Ct values for ACTB differed significantly between normal cerebral white matter and normal meninges and between normal meninges and meningiomas. In BestKeeper, the standard deviation of Ct values in ACTB, RPS18, and TBP were 1.79, 1.58, and 1.35, respectively, and the values of Pearson correlation coefficient in ACTB, RPS18, and TBP were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.87, respectively. In NormFinder, the stability values in ACTB, RPS18, and TBP were 0.036, 0.015, and 0.049, respectively. It was determined that RPS18 was the most stable housekeeping gene, though ACTB and TBP were also confirmed to be usable by NormFinder.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Ct values for housekeeping genes in normal brain tissues and meningiomas. Plots show Ct values in samples of normal cerebral white matter, meninges, and meningiomas; the bars indicate the mean Ct values. *P<0.05.

The relative mRNA expression of target genes (VEGFA, KDR, EGFR, and PDGFRA) is shown in Fig. 2. The relative mRNA expression of target genes was based on the RPS18 Ct values obtained from the appropriately selected internal standard, and the values were normalized from the mean relative expression in normal meninges. VEGFA and EGFR mRNA expression was significantly higher in meningiomas. There was no significant difference in PDGFRA mRNA expression in meningiomas. KDR mRNA expression in meningiomas was significantly lower than that in normal meninges.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

mRNA expression of VEGFA, KDR, EGFR, and PDGFRA. Plots show individual values of relative mRNA expression in normal meninges and in meningiomas; the bars indicate the mean values of relative mRNA expression. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

The mRNA expression of housekeeping genes was also different among tissues obtained from the normal cerebral white matter, normal meninges, and meningiomas. Therefore, it was very important to choose the appropriate control tissue and internal standard for comparative evaluation of mRNA expression. In this study, normal meninges as control tissue and RPS18 as an internal standard gene were chosen for the evaluation of mRNA expression.

The results showed that mRNA expression of VEGFA and EGFR was increased in grade I meningioma as speculated from previous reports [3, 5, 14]. However, the mRNA expression of KDR was decreased significantly; this was in contrast to findings in human meningiomas [6]. It has been reported that the expression of VEGFR-1 mRNA in canine meningioma varies [5]. It has been suggested that VEGFR-1 may inhibit tumor growth via regulation of VEGF bioavailability through ligand binding to alternatively spliced soluble receptors, and downregulation of VEGFR-1 may provide a biological advantage for tumor growth [15]. It is possible that the expression of VEGF receptors, including the KDR, varies significantly as a response to significant increases in the levels of VEGF in some brain tumors.

Based on the results of comparative examination of well-used housekeeping genes, RPS18 was proven to be a suitable internal standard for comparison of mRNA expression between normal meninges and meningiomas in dogs. The comparative mRNA expression in this study was measured more accurately than it is in conventional methods because normal meninges and RPS18 were chosen as control tissue and internal standard, respectively. Measuring mRNA expression with real-time RT-PCR using appropriate control tissue and internal standard can provide useful information to understanding the pathogenesis of canine meningiomas, and this information corresponds with the immunohistochemical findings. In addition, the techniques require a smaller amount of tissues and a shorter time to perform than immunohistochemical examination.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant number, 16K21410).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Andersen C. L., Jensen J. L., Ørntoft T. F.2004. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64: 5245–5250. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andersson U., Guo D., Malmer B., Bergenheim A. T., Brännström T., Hedman H., Henriksson R.2004. Epidermal growth factor receptor family (EGFR, ErbB2-4) in gliomas and meningiomas. Acta Neuropathol. 108: 135–142. doi: 10.1007/s00401-004-0875-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dickinson P. J.2014. Advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities for intracranial tumors. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 28: 1165–1185. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dickinson P. J., Sturges B. K., Higgins R. J., Roberts B. N., Leutenegger C. M., Bollen A. W., LeCouteur R. A.2008. Vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA expression and peritumoral edema in canine primary central nervous system tumors. Vet. Pathol. 45: 131–139. doi: 10.1354/vp.45-2-131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dickinson P. J., Roberts B. N., Higgins R. J., Leutenegger C. M., Bollen A. W., Kass P. H., LeCouteur R. A.2006. Expression of receptor tyrosine kinases VEGFR-1 (FLT-1), VEGFR-2 (KDR), EGFR-1, PDGFRalpha and c-Met in canine primary brain tumours. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 4: 132–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2006.00101.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hatva E., Kaipainen A., Mentula P., Jääskeläinen J., Paetau A., Haltia M., Alitalo K.1995. Expression of endothelial cell-specific receptor tyrosine kinases and growth factors in human brain tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 146: 368–378. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Higgins R. J., Bollen A. W., Dickinson P. J., Sisó-Llonch S.2016. Tumors of the nervous system. pp. 834–891. In: Tumors in Domestic Animals, 5th ed. (Meuten, D. J., ed.), Wiley, Hoboken. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ide T., Uchida K., Kikuta F., Suzuki K., Nakayama H.2010. Immunohistochemical characterization of canine neuroepithelial tumors. Vet. Pathol. 47: 741–750. doi: 10.1177/0300985810363486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koestner A., Bilzer T., Fatzer R.1999. Histological Classification of Tumors of the Nervous System of Domestic Animals, 2nd ed., The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matiasek L. A., Platt S. R., Adams V., Scase T. J., Keys D., Miller J., Adamo F., Long S., Matiasek K.2009. Ki-67 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in intracranial meningiomas in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 23: 146–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0235.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pfaffl M. W., Tichopad A., Prgomet C., Neuvians T. P.2004. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol. Lett. 26: 509–515. doi: 10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pfister C., Pfrommer H., Tatagiba M. S., Roser F.2012. Vascular endothelial growth factor signals through platelet-derived growth factor receptor β in meningiomas in vitro. Br. J. Cancer 107: 1702–1713. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Platt S. R., Scase T. J., Adams V., Wieczorek L., Miller J., Adamo F., Long S.2006. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in canine intracranial meningiomas and association with patient survival. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 20: 663–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2006.tb02912.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rossmeisl J. H., Duncan R. B., Huckle W. R., Troy G. C.2007. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in tumors and plasma from dogs with primary intracranial neoplasms. Am. J. Vet. Res. 68: 1239–1245. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.11.1239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shibuya M.2001. Structure and dual function of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (Flt-1). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 33: 409–420. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00026-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Snyder J. M., Shofer F. S., Van Winkle T. J., Massicotte C.2006. Canine intracranial primary neoplasia: 173 cases (1986–2003). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 20: 669–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

RESOURCES