Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2018 Aug 23;146(16):2096–2101. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818002303

Emerging of ptxP3 lineage in Bordetella pertussis strains circulating in a population in northeastern Mexico

J L Gutiérrez-Ferman 1, L Villarreal-Treviño 2, J M Ramírez-Aranda 3, A Camacho-Ortiz 4, M R Ballesteros-Elizondo 5, M R Moreno-Juárez 5, S Mendoza-Olazarán 1, M E de la O Cavazos 5, J Z Villarreal-Pérez 6, M A Gómez-Govea 2, E Garza-González 1,
PMCID: PMC6453012  PMID: 30136639

Abstract

We determined the molecular epidemiology of Bordetella pertussis isolates to evaluate its potential impact on pertussis reemergence in a population of Mexico. Symptomatic and asymptomatic cases were included. Pertussis infection was confirmed by culture and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Selected B. pertussis isolates were further analysed; i.e. clonality was analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and ptxP-ptxA, prn, fim2 and fim3 typing was performed by PCR and sequencing. Out of 11 864 analysed samples, 687 (5.8%) were positive for pertussis, with 244 (36%) confirmed by both culture and PCR whereas 115 (17%) were positive only by culture and 328 (48%) were positive only by PCR. One predominant clone (clone A, n = 62/113; 55%) and three major subtypes (A1, A2 and A3) were identified by PFGE. All 113 selected isolates had the allelic combination ptxP3-ptxA1. The predominant clone A and the three major subtypes (A1, A2 and A3) corresponded to the emerging genotypes ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-2 and ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-1. In conclusion, the presence of an endemic clone and three predominant subtypes belonging to the genotypes ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-2 and ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-1 were detected. This finding supports the global spread/expansion reported for these outbreaks associated genotypes.

Key words: Bordetella pertussis, genotyping, Mexico, ptxP3, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Introduction

Bordetella pertussis is the primary aetiologic agent of pertussis, a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable disease of the human respiratory tract [1].

In Mexico, vaccination against pertussis started in 1954 with the use of an inactivated whole-cell vaccine (wP) that was used for more than 50 years in a five-dose scheme. Side effects of this vaccine led to the development of an acellular vaccine (aP) [2] which was introduced in 2007 [3].

The current immunization schedule consists of four doses of a pentavalent acellular vaccine (DTaP/Hib/IPV) (Sanofi-Aventis de México, S.A. de C.V.) that contains pertussis toxin (PT) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) toxoids as protective antigens and is administered at 2, 4, 6 and 18 months of age. The fifth and final dose, administered at the age of 4 years, is a booster with absorbed diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) (Laboratorios de Biológicos y Reactivos de México, S.A. de C.V). This vaccine contains the inactivated B. pertussis strains Bp134, Bp509, Bp6224 and Bp25525 [47].

The increase in pertussis has been attributed mainly to improved diagnostic methods and the use of acellular vaccines which fails to protect against the colonisation and transmission of the aetiologic agent [8, 9]. On the other hand, it has been suggested that the whole-cell vaccine has led to the global emergence of ptxP3 positive strains, which have been associated with increased virulence of the pathogen [10, 11] and more severe disease [11, 12]. Also, it has been reported the appearance of isolates that present allelic variations among the main virulence factors used as vaccine antigens, such as pertussis toxin, FHA, pertactin (PRN) and fimbriaes (FIM) [13].

In the last decade, several countries reported an increase of pertussis cases, including Australia, the Netherlands, Spain, Japan, Canada, the USA, Peru and Brazil [11, 1418].

In 2009 and 2012, the number of pertussis cases increased in various states of Mexico, amongst which: Sonora, Jalisco, Durango, Estado de Mexico and Nuevo León. In Nuevo León the pertussis incidence increased from 4.45 to 5.69 cases per 100 000 habitants [19].

In order to explain the reemergence of pertussis, we assessed the molecular epidemiology of B. pertussis isolates circulating in the population of northeastern Mexico.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was performed in compliance with the requirements of the research and biosafety ethics committee of the School of Medicine of the ‘Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León’ (Approval GA17-00001). Epidemiological and demographic data of the patients were included as part of a routine laboratory diagnosis. Therefore, no informed consent was required.

Study population and pertussis diagnosis

Symptomatic and asymptomatic cases were recruited from eight different public health jurisdictions of the secretary of health of Nuevo León, Mexico from the epidemiological week (EW) 52, 2006 to EW 52, 2014. The Centres for Disease Control clinical criteria for pertussis formed the guidelines to identify suspected cases of pertussis [20].

Of each suspicious pertussis case, a maximum of five personal contacts were recruited. Asymptomatic contacts were defined as those contacts with the detection of Bordetella spp. positive by culture and PCR without any symptoms.

Nasopharyngeal swabs were cultured on charcoal agar plates (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) supplemented with 5% w/v defibrinated sheep blood and cephalexin (0.04 µg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, the USA). Colonies with Bordetella morphology were phenotypically tested, i.e. Gram staining, catalase, oxidase, motility, urea hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, citrate utilisation and culture on MacConkey and blood agar. Species identification of the recovered isolates by culture and the samples of nasopharyngeal swabs were confirmed by real-time PCR [21]. Recovered isolates were stored at −80 °C in brain-heart infusion broth containing 30% glycerol.

Demographic information was obtained from all patients with a positive pertussis diagnosis. Epidemiological data, such as case or contact, age and gender was recovered. Vaccination history was obtained from National Vaccination Card used in Mexico from each patient.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE was performed on selected isolates. Isolates were grown for 72 h at 37 °C on charcoal agar plates supplemented with 5% w/v defibrinated sheep blood. Colonies were washed in 2 ml 0.85% w/v saline solution (3 min, 13 500 rpm) and the pellet was resuspended in 410 µl PIV buffer (1 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl; pH 7.4). After the addition of 150 µl 1.5% w/v molecular grade agarose, plugs were prepared from homogeneous mixtures.

The plugs were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h in 1 ml lysis solution (6 mM Tris (pH 8), 1 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA (pH 8), 0.5% w/v, N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.2%, w/v, N-deoxycholate) containing 1 mg/ml lysozyme (Bio Basic, Inc. Ontario, Canada) and 50 µg/ml RNase A (US Biological). The lysis solution was replaced by 1 ml ES-buffer (100 mM EDTA (pH 8), 1% w/v N-lauroylsarcosine) with 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K (Bioline, USA Inc., Boston, MA. E.U.A.) and incubated overnight at 55 °C. After repeated washing (5 × 30 min. with agitation) of the plugs in 1 × TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA; pH 8), they were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C with restriction buffer containing 20 eU XbaI enzyme (Promega Fitchburg, Wisconsin, USA). Plugs were loaded on a 1.0% w/v agarose gel with 0.5 × Tris-borate-EDTA. The pulsed-field program was run on a CHEF-DRII system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) under previously described conditions [22]. Restriction patterns were visually compared with Lab-Works-IVP 4.5 software (Ultra-Violet products, Upland, Armonk, NY). The similarity coefficients of PFGE patterns were calculated using the Jaccard coefficient and SPSS v20.0 software.

Isolates with identical (i.e. 100% similar) restriction patterns were classified as a clone and strains that differed in 2–3 restriction fragments were classified as a subtype [23].

Genotyping

To sequence the ptxP, ptxA, prn, fim2 and fim3 regions in selected B. pertussis isolates, DNA was extracted with the phenol-chloroform method and amplified by PCR using previously described oligonucleotides and conditions [24, 25]. PCR products were purified by precipitation with 3 M sodium acetate and absolute ethanol at −20 °C. The products were sequenced at Macrogen, Korea. Sequencing reactions were performed in the DNA Engine Tetrad 2 Peltier Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD) using the ABI BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). The samples were injected to electrophoresis in an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyser (Applied Biosystems) and the sequences were compared on the Bio Edit platform (Biological Sequence Alignment Editor Platform).

Statistical analysis

Difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated cases was calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Z-test of proportions was applied to compare the clone A variations through the years with the SPSSv20 software. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Study population and species detected

Among 11 864 nasopharyngeal swabs analysed, 687 (5.8%) were positive for pertussis; 244 (36%) were confirmed by both culture and PCR and 328 (48%) only by PCR (Table 1). The most frequently detected species were: B. pertussis (n = 665/687, 97%), Bordetella parapertussis (n = 16/687, 2.3%) and Bordetella bronchiseptica (n = 2/687). Four cases (n = 4/687) had a coinfection involving B. pertussis and B. parapertussis. We recovered a total of 359 clinical isolates (352 B. pertussis, 6 B. parapertussis and 1 B. bronchiseptica) during the study period.

Table 1.

Study population included from 2006 to 2014, in the state of Nuevo León, Mexico

Year Population included (n) Laboratory-confirmed symptomatic and asymptomatic cases Total
Only by culture Only by PCR Culture and PCR Symptomatic cases Asymptomatic cases
2006 ND 1 ND ND 0 1
2007 ND 4 ND ND 2 2
2008 440 34 ND ND 21 13
2009 3171 76 ND ND 54 22
2010 906 0 46 11 29 28
2011 1501 0 76 41 91 26
2012 2280 0 105 74 146 33
2013 1553 0 45 51 67 29
2014 2013 0 56 67 95 28
Total 11 864 115 328 244 505 182

ND: no data because the PCR diagnosis was not performed. The PCR was implemented in 2010.

Epidemiological data

Epidemiological data were available from 359 cases: 265 symptomatic (74%) and 94 asymptomatic (26%). Among symptomatic cases, 142 (53%) were female and 123 (47%) were male. The mean age of symptomatic cases was 2 months (range 13 days–13 years). Interestingly, 55% (n = 94) of the children aged between 2 and 18 months had not received any aP vaccine at all, while 36% (n = 62) had received only the first dose (Table 2). In contrast, of the 94 asymptomatic cases, 68 (72%) were female and 26 (28%) were male. The mean age of the contacts was 24 years (range 10 months–77 years). More than 83% of asymptomatic cases should have had the complete immunisation scheme. However, only one participant had the complete scheme.

Table 2.

Distribution of vaccination by age group of the symptomatic cases

Age group Cases with indicated number of vaccine doses (%)
0 1 2 3 ⩾4 Total
<2 m 87 (97) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 88
2–18 m 94 (55) 62 (36) 10 (6) 3 (2) 1 (0.5) 170
19 m–4 y 1 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
5–15 y 1 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
Total n (%) 183 (69)* 63 (24) 10 (4) 3 (1.1) 1 (0.3) 260

m, months; y, years; ND, no data available.

*P < 0.05 between vaccinated (n = 77) and unvaccinated (n = 183) patients.

Clonal diversity of the isolates

A total of 113 B. pertussis isolates recovered from both symptomatic (n = 81) and asymptomatic (n = 32) cases were selected for PFGE typing, using a simple sampling technique stratified by years (Confidence level CI 99%, Confidence Interval CI = 10). The total size of each stratum was calculated with the following formula: ni = n (Ni/N), where ‘n’ is the total size previously calculated (n = 113), ‘N’ is the total size of the population of the study (n = 352) and ‘Ni’ is the size of the stratum (number of the isolates collected by years). On this basis, we included 1 isolate from 2007, 11 from 2008, 23 from 2009, 4 from 2010, 13 from 2011, 24 from 2012, 16 from 2013 and 21 from 2014. DNA digestion generated a maximum of 15 restriction fragments and 12 pulsotypes with a similarity from 75 to 100% (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of 113 B. pertussis isolates collected from 2007 to 2014. 1number and percent of isolates corresponding to each genotype. 2Similarity coefficient generated using SPSS 20.0 software.

Twelve different clones were identified; the predominant clone was designated A and three major subtypes were identified as A1, A2 and A3. Clone A represented 55% (n = 62/113) of the isolates and persisted from 2009 to 2014. The frequency of Clone A increased from 2% in 2010 to 37% in 2012 (P < 0.05) and to 21% in 2014. Subtype A1 persisted from 2008 to 2011 and increased from 33% in 2008 to 53% in 2009. Nevertheless, it was not detected in the following years (2012–2014). Subtype A2 was identified for 3 years (2008, 2009 and 2011) and was not identified in the following years. On another hand, Subtype A3 appeared from 2012 to 2014 while clone A decreasing. None of the predominant pulsotypes was detected in 2007 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Temporal relation of the hypervirulent clone (A) and subtypes (A1, A2 and A3) over the years. Bars represent the incidence of reported cases of pertussis (per 100 000 hab) by years, in Nuevo Leon, Mexico, from 2007 to 2014.

Among the selected isolates, just four of them were detected to be case/contact related with two belonging to clone A (recovered in 2008) and two to clone A1 (recovered in 2014).

Pulsotypes and vaccination status

Clone A and subtypes A1, A2 and A3 were isolated from both vaccinated and unvaccinated participants; 45% (n = 28/62) of all participants infected with clone A had not received any vaccine, 24% (n = 15/62) had received the first dose of aP vaccine and 1.6% (n = 1/62) had received three aP vaccine doses. Interestingly, none of the participants infected with clone A or the major subtypes had been given the fifth and final dose as recommended by the vaccination schedule.

Clone A was recovered from the eight health districts of the state of Nuevo Leon. It appeared in 2009 in the city of Monterrey (state capital) and spread from there to the other municipalities during the following years. On the other hand, subtype A3 was recovered from five health districts and subtypes A1 and A2 from three.

Typing of ptxP and ptxA regions

Sequencing yielded that 100% (n = 113/113) of isolates harboured the allelic combination ptxP3-ptxA1 (ptxS1A). A random selection of clone A and subtypes A1-A3 were typed for prn, fim2 and fim3 genes. The comparative analysis demonstrated the presence of ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-2 (subtypes A1 = 2008 and A2 = 2009) and ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-1 (Clone A = 2012, A3 = 2014) genotypes.

Discussion

This is the first report on the epidemiological and molecular analysis of B. pertussis isolates from a population of northeastern Mexico in a period from 2006 to 2014. We identified four representative pulsotypes (A, A1, A2 and A3) and displayed the dynamic and epidemiological changes of B. pertussis strains throughout the study period.

Subtypes A1 and A2 were displaced by clone A, which predominated during the 2012 outbreak. Clone A spread through the state of Nuevo Leon and became endemic for 6 consecutive years (2009–2014) in both the vaccinated (aP vaccine) and unvaccinated population. Interestingly, clone A was the only one that was distributed in all jurisdictions, which demonstrates its ability for statewide dissemination.

Previous studies have suggested that vaccination with the wP vaccine has led to the generation of strains presenting allelic and antigenic variants in the major virulence factors of the microorganism (prn, ptxP, ptxA, fim2, fim3, fha), as well as to the emergence of hypervirulent ptxP3 strains [13]. Our results are consistent with this idea. In Mexico, the wP vaccine was used for more than 50 years, which may have facilitated the appearance of ptxP3 strains in our population. However, this cannot be demonstrated because isolates were not collected before and during the period that wP vaccine was applied. Despite this, the ptxP3 lineage could be involved. Previous studies in other countries have shown the association between the appearance of ptxP3 strains and the resurgence of the disease [10, 26].

Interestingly, the endemic clone A showed the emerging genotype ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-1 also known as MT27a [16]. In this genotype, the allele for the fimbria type changed from fim3-2 to fim3-1. This change has been associated with both the transition from wP to aP vaccination in countries where fimbrial proteins are included as antigens of aP vaccine [27].

The appearance of emerging genotypes has agreed with the increased pertussis incidence in other countries as well seems to be related in Mexico [11]. It has been shown that a large proportion of the isolates is harbouring the allelic combination ptxP3-prn2, lack expression of the PRN [28]. It is necessary to extend the studies to find out if PRN deficient isolates are circulating in Mexico.

Although this situation has been associated with the wide use of aP vaccine which includes PRN, these isolates were detected before the implementation of aP vaccination. Despite this, its appearance coincides with an increased incidence previously occurred in the USA and Australia [29, 30]. Contrarily, in Mexico, FIM and PRN proteins are not included in the aP vaccination.

We believe that aP vaccination has contributed to the dissemination of the microorganism because only 2 years after the replacement of wP by aP there was a shift in the epidemiological pattern of the disease with outbreaks in 2009 and 2012 (years with the highest incidence rates in the state).

Besides, we detected a high level of incomplete vaccination schemes; only one participant had a complete vaccination scheme. This is an alarming situation because children and adults are the main sources of transmission to unvaccinated infants [3134]. The findings highlight the importance of rigorous evaluation of the vaccination scheme used in Mexico as well as the assessment of the effectiveness of the applied aP vaccine.

The observed increment in pertussis may also reflect the use of more sensitive and specific diagnostic methods. In Nuevo León, in the past, pertussis was confirmed by culture and phenotypic tests. In 2010, the use of dual-target real-time PCR was implemented [35] and in 2011, a multiple target real-time PCR was used [21]. The multiple target PCR allows the identification of B. parapertussis, Bordetella holmesii and a presumptive identification of B. bronchiseptica. Our data show that the implementation of multiplex PCR coincides with an increase in identified pertussis cases. Although this is a known phenomenon, it is worth mentioning because the diagnosis of pertussis by both phenotypic and genotypic methods is performed only in four Mexican states: Nuevo León, Sonora, San Luis Potosí and Chiapas [36].

This study has some limitations, e.g. the incomplete vaccination history data, the limited clinical data from patients; and that some symptomatic cases and related asymptomatic cases may represent the same strain and thus may introduce selection bias in the sampling.

In conclusion, the presence of an endemic clone and three predominant subtypes belonging to the genotypes ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-2 and ptxP3-ptxA1-prn2-fim2-1-fim3-1 were detected. This finding supports the global spread/expansion reported for these outbreaks associated genotypes.

Acknowledgements

We thank Denisse Rodríguez Gómez for her kind assistance at the laboratory.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Carbonetti NH (2016) Bordetella pertussis: new concepts in pathogenesis and treatment. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 29, 287–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sato Y, Kimura M and Fukumi H (1984) Development of a pertussis component vaccine in Japan. Lancet 1, 122–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Perez-Perez GF et al. (2015) Pertussis in Mexico, an epidemiological overview. A study of 19 years at the Institute Mexicano del Seguro Social. Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 52, 164–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Immunization schedules by diseases. Available at http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/diseases (Accessed 27 February 2018).
  • 5.Manual de vacunación 2008–2009. Available at http://saludchiapas.gob.mx/doc/biblioteca_virtual/manuales_modelos/Manual_Vacunacion_2008_2009.pdf (Accessed 27 February 2018).
  • 6.Cofepris. Comisión de autorización sanitaria. Available at http://www.cofepris.gob.mx/AS/Documents/RegistroSanitarioMedicamentos/Vacunas/Vacunas.pdf (Accessed 27 February 2018).
  • 7.Cofepris. Vacuna absorbida antidiftérica, antitetánica y contra la tosferina. Available at http://www.cofepris.gob.mx/AS/Documents/RegistroSanitarioMedicamentos/Vacunas/085m2003.pdf (Accessed 27 February 2018).
  • 8.Mooi FR, Van Der Maas NA and De Melker HE (2014) Pertussis resurgence: waning immunity and pathogen adaptation - two sides of the same coin. Epidemiology and Infection 142, 685–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Warfel JM, Zimmerman LI and Merkel TJ (2014) Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 787–792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mooi FR et al. (2009) Bordetella pertussis strains with increased toxin production associated with pertussis resurgence. Emerging Infectious Diseases 15, 1206–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bailon H et al. (2016) Increase in pertussis cases along with high prevalence of two emerging genotypes of Bordetella pertussis in Peru, 2012. BMC Infectious Diseases 16, 422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clarke M et al. (2016) The relationship between Bordetella pertussis genotype and clinical severity in Australian children with pertussis. The Journal of Infection 72, 171–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bouchez V et al. (2015) New data on vaccine antigen deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates. Vaccines 3, 751–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campbell P et al. (2012) Increased population prevalence of low pertussis toxin antibody levels in young children preceding a record pertussis epidemic in Australia. PLoS ONE 7, e35874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Witt MA, Katz PH and Witt DJ (2012) Unexpectedly limited durability of immunity following acellular pertussis vaccination in preadolescents in a North American outbreak. Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 54, 1730–1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miyaji Y et al. (2013) Genetic analysis of Bordetella pertussis isolates from the 2008–2010 pertussis epidemic in Japan. PLoS ONE 8, e77165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fathima S et al. (2014) Bordetella pertussis in sporadic and outbreak settings in Alberta, Canada, July 2004-December 2012. BMC Infectious Diseases 14, 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rocha EL et al. (2017) The characterization of Bordetella pertussis strains isolated in the Central-Western region of Brazil suggests the selection of a specific genetic profile during 2012–2014 outbreaks. Epidemiology and Infection 145, 1392–1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dirección General de Epidemiología (DGE). Anuario de morbilidad 1984–2016. Available at http://www.epidemiologia.salud.gob.mx/anuario/html/incidencia_enfermedad.html (Accessed 27 February 2018).
  • 20.Centros para el control y la prevención de enfermedades. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/countries/lapp-mexico-sp.html (Accessed 27 February 2018).
  • 21.Tatti KM et al. (2011) Novel multitarget real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of Bordetella species in clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 4059–4066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bisgard KM et al. (2001) Molecular epidemiology of Bordetella pertussis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile: Cincinnati, 1989–1996. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 183, 1360–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tenover FC et al. (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33, 2233–2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schmidtke AJ et al. (2012) Population diversity among Bordetella pertussis isolates, United States, 1935–2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases 18, 1248–1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Borisova O et al. (2007) Antigenic divergence between Bordetella pertussis clinical isolates from Moscow, Russia, and vaccine strains. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology: CVI 14, 234–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.King AJ et al. (2013) Genome-wide gene expression analysis of Bordetella pertussis isolates associated with a resurgence in pertussis: elucidation of factors involved in the increased fitness of epidemic strains. PLoS ONE 8, e66150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kurniawan J et al. (2010) Bordetella pertussis clones identified by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 16, 297–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lam C et al. (2014) Rapid increase in pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates, Australia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20, 626–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pawloski LC et al. (2014) Prevalence and molecular characterization of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis in the United States. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology: CVI 21, 119–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Safarchi A et al. (2016) Genomic dissection of Australian Bordetella pertussis isolates from the 2008–2012 epidemic. The Journal of Infection 72, 468–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Conde-Glez C et al. (2014) Seroprevalence of Bordetella pertussis in the Mexican population: a cross-sectional study. Epidemiology and Infection 142, 706–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bisgard KM et al. (2004) Infant pertussis: who was the source? The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 23, 985–989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Greeff SC et al. (2010) Pertussis disease burden in the household: how to protect young infants. Clinical Infectious Diseases: an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 50, 1339–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wendelboe AM et al. (2007) Transmission of Bordetella pertussis to young infants. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 26, 293–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tatti KM et al. (2008) Development and evaluation of dual-target real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to detect Bordetella spp. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 61, 264–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lineamientos para la vigilancia epidemiológica de tos-ferina y síndrome coqueluchoide por laboratorio. InDRE. Available at http://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/23793/Lineamientos_para_la_vigilancia_epidemiologica_de_tosferina_y_sindrome_coqueluchoide.pdf (Accessed 27 February 2018).

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES