Skip to main content
European Stroke Journal logoLink to European Stroke Journal
. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):137–143. doi: 10.1177/2396987317693402

Next generation sequencing analysis of patients with familial cervical artery dissection

Caspar Grond-Ginsbach 1,, Tobias Brandt 2, Manja Kloss 1, Suna Su Aksay 1, Philipp Lyrer 3, Christopher Traenka 3, Philipp Erhart 4, Juan Jose Martin 5, Ayse Altintas 6, Aksel Siva 6, Gabriel R de Freitas 7, Andreas Thie 8, Jochen Machetanz 9, Ralf W Baumgartner 10, Martin Dichgans 11,12, Stefan T Engelter 3,13
PMCID: PMC6453217  PMID: 31008308

Abstract

Background

The cause of cervical artery dissection is not well understood. We test the hypothesis that mutations in genes associated with known arterial connective tissue disorders are enriched in patients with familial cervical artery dissection.

Patients and methods

Patient duos from nine pedigrees with familial cervical artery dissection were analyzed by whole exome sequencing. Single nucleotide variants in a panel of 11 candidate genes (ACTA2, MYH11, FBN1, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, TGFB2, COL3A1, COL4A1, SMAD3, MYLK and SLC2A10) were prioritized according to functionality (stop-loss, nonsense, and missense variants with polyphen-2 score ≥0.95). Variants classified as “benign” or “likely benign” in the ClinVar database were excluded from further analysis. For comparison, non-benign stop-loss, nonsense and missense variants with polyphen-2 score ≥0.95 in the same panel of candidate genes were identified in the European non-Finnish population of the ExAC database (n = 33,370).

Results

Non-benign Single nucleotide variants in both affected patients were identified in four of the nine cervical artery dissection families (COL3A1; Gly324Ser, FBN1: Arg2554Trp, COL4A1: Pro116Leu, and TGFBR2: Ala292Thr) yielding an allele frequency of 22.2% (4/18). In the comparison group, 1782 variants were present in 33,370 subjects from the ExAC database (allele frequency: 1782/66,740 = 2.7%; p = 0.0008; odds ratio = 14.2; 95% confidence interval = 3.8–52.9).

Conclusion

Cervical artery dissection families showed enrichment for non-benign variants in genes associated with arterial connective tissue disorders. The observation that findings differed across families indicates genetic heterogeneity of familial cervical artery dissection.

Keywords: Cervical artery dissection, non-benign single nucleotide variants, arterial connective tissue disorder


Spontaneous dissection of the cervical arteries (CeAD) is an important cause of ischemic stroke in younger adults. The detailed causes leading to CeAD are not well understood.13 Major trauma of the neck or head is a rare cause of CeAD, but minor mechanical trigger events were reported in less than half of the patients,4 which are otherwise healthy individuals typically lacking atherosclerotic vascular risk factors.4,5 Genetic factors were assumed to modify the risk of occurrence of CeAD.6 Indeed, carriers of the major allele of a common variant (rs9349379) of the phosphatase and actin regulator 1 encoding gene (PHACTR1) were recently found to have a slightly reduced risk for CeAD.7 Clinical connective tissue signs and electron microscopic connective tissue alterations were associated with CeAD.8,9 Nevertheless, known inherited connective tissue disorders seemed exceptional with a frequency of <1% in a recent large series of patients.10,11 Moreover, mutation search in few candidate genes associated with inherited connective tissue disorders lead to isolated suggestive findings, but was unsuccessful in most patients.8,1214 Thus, additional genetic factors modifying the risk for CeAD are yet to be discovered.

In the current study, we assumed that unrecognized manifestations of known inherited connective tissue disorders may predispose to CeAD. To test this assumption, we considered familial CeAD lacking clinically apparent connective tissue disorders as ideal model. On the basis of published genetic studies of arterial connective tissue disorders, we performed a next generation sequencing study and defined a panel of 11 candidate genes which were associated with arterial connective tissue disorders.1518 In nine families with familial CeAD, we searched for putative disease-associated, deleterious variants in the predefined panel of candidate genes. Findings were compared with published findings from the European non-Finnish population of the ExAC database (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/).19,20

Material and methods

CeAD patients with a family history of CeAD were identified between 2004 and 2015 in databases of neurology departments and stroke centers with a special interest in CeAD.2122 All identified families were of German or Swiss–German origin. All affected patients were examined, diagnosed, and treated by stroke neurologists. The diagnosis of CeAD was verified and based on arterial imaging, in particular on magnetic resonance imaging findings.2 This includes the presence of at least one of the following criteria: mural hematoma, aneurysmal dilatation, long tapering stenosis, intimal flap, double lumen, or occlusion ≥2 cm above the carotid bifurcation revealing an aneurysmal dilatation or a long tapering stenosis after recanalization in a cervical artery (i.e. internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery (VA)). For the current analysis, the following standardized variables were analyzed, applying criteria used in previous publications:5 age (at onset), sex, site of dissection (ICA orVA), side, type of familial relationship and country of birth.

Peripheral blood was used for DNA extraction. Exome sequencing was performed at the German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, on a Genome Analyzer IIx system (Illumina) after in-solution enrichment of exonic sequences (SureSelect Human All Exon 38 Mb kit, Agilent). Read alignment was performed with BWA (version 0.5.8) to the human genome assembly hg19. Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were detected with SAMtools (v 0.1.7).

On the basis of published studies,1518 we defined a panel of 11 candidate genes (ACTA2, MYH11, FBN1, COL3A1, COL4A1, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, TGFB2, SMAD3, MYLK, SLC2A10) associated with arterial connective tissue disorders (vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections, arterial tortuosity syndrome). SNV findings from the CeAD families were prioritized if they (1) had a coverage (depth) of ≥40 reads; (2) caused nonsense or stop-loss substitutions in the encoded gene product, or missense substitutions with polyphen-2 probability scores ≥0.95. In a final filtering step, prioritized missense mutations with polyphen-2 scores ≥0.95 that were classified as “benign”, “likely benign” or “benign/likely benign”23 in the ClinVar browser (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/)24 were removed from subsequent analysis.

Prioritized “non-benign” SNV findings in the CeAD families were compared with reported findings in the European (non-Finnish) populations from the ExAC database (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/).19,20 For each of the 11 arterial connective tissue genes from the candidate panel, all SNVs causing nonsense or stop-loss substitutions or causing missense substitution with polyphen-2 proability score ≥0.95 and not classified as “benign,” “likely benign,” or “benign/likely benign” in ClinVar were looked up in the ExAC Browser and scored as non-benign variants occurring in the population.

Results

The study population included nine families with CeAD, each comprising of two family members. In six families, both patients had internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD). Patients from three further families had dissections in different arterial beds. Multiple or recurrent dissection events were recorded in five families (Table 1). Family trees of the pedigrees are shown in Figure 1. Only relatives with documented presence dissections or with self-reported absence of dissections were represented in the family trees. Genetic testing was performed in affected relatives only.

Table 1.

The patient population, comprising 18 affected first-degree relatives from nine families.

ID Index-patient Related patient Relationship Additional affected relative
Familial ICA Dissection
188 32 F ICA-le 38 F ICA-bilateral Sisters Father with ICAD
193 43 M ICA-le 41 F ICA-le Brother–sister
604 19 F ICA-ri 18 F ICA-ri Cousine–cousine Sister of index-patient with ICAD
2149 49 F ICA-le 31 F ICA-ri Mother–daughter
2932 45 M ICA-le 39 F ICA-le Brother–sister
2953 53 M ICA-le 29 F ICA-ri, ICAD-le Father–daughter
Different vascular systems affected
15 31 M ICA-le 31 M VA-le, 4 recurrent CeADs Father–son
2889 33 F ICA-bilateral 37 M VA-ri Sister–brother
2904 20 F VA-ri, ICAD-ri 40 M Aorta type A Daughter–father

Note: Numbers indicate years of age at onset of first cervical artery dissection (CeAD) event. Family 2953 was of German–Swiss origin, all other families were from German origin. F: female; M: male; VA: vertebral artery; ICA: internal carotid artery; le: left; ri: right.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Pedigrees of the analysed families. Arrows indicate index-patients (index patients of Table 1). Filled symbols indicate patients with CeAD, open symbols indicate relatives with documented self-reported absence of CeAD. Genetic analysis was performed solely in affected relatives.

SNV were considered as deleterious, if they (1) caused a premature stop of the encoded gene product, (2) removed a stop-codon (“stop-loss”) or (3) induced a missense mutation with polyphen-2 probability score ≥0.95 and with ClinVar classification other than “benign” or “non-benign”. A total of 1242 SNV in the panel of candidate genes were identified in the patient sample, among them 142 SNVs leading to nonsense, stop-loss or missense substitution. Nine missense mutations with polyphen-2 probability score ≥0.95 were classified as “non-benign”. These non-benign variants in genes associated with arterial connective tissue disorders occurred in four of the nine analyzed CeAD families. These include mutations in COL3A1, FBN1, COL4A1, and TGFBR2, each exclusively in one family. Analysis of copy number variation in the next generation sequencing data did not indicate the occurrence of variants larger than five exons in any of the cases (data not shown).

In detail, two cousins with ICAD from family 604 carried a COL3A1 Gly324Ser substitution which was not found in any control. Both mothers of the patients were asymptomatic carriers of this rare and deleterious SNV. A missense mutation in FBN1 (Arg2554Trp) was identified in a mother and her daughter of family 2149. A Pro116Leu substitution in COL4A1 was identified in family 2953. The father of this family had a dissecting aneurysm of the ICA and multiple aneurysms in other arterial locations. His daughter had an ICAD followed by an asymptomatic contralateral ICAD within four weeks after the first event. The index patient of family 2904 had recurrent ICAD events, whereas her father suffered aortic dissection. Both father and daughter carried a missense mutation (Ala292Thr) in TGFBR2, encoding the transforming growth factor-beta receptor 2. Both patients had hypermobile joints. Moreover, the father showed minor connective tissue signs (Table 2). Finally, one non-benign variant associated with arterial connective tissue disorders (Gly343Arg in FBN1) was found in one affected relative of family 604 (the index-patient, indicated by an arrow in Figure 1), but absent from her affected cousine.

Table 2.

Prioritized non-benign variants in the patient sample.

ID Gene Variant Depth dbSNP Polyphen ClinVar ExAC allele
604 COL3A1 G324S 135/164 unknown 0.991 (prob. damaging) Pathogenic Not found
FBN1 G343R 77 rs146726731 1.000 (prob. damaging) Conflicting 13/66,698
2149 FBN1 R2554W 56/93 rs369294972 9.975 (prob. damaging) Uncertain 2/63,584
2953 COL4A1 P116L 71/75 rs538816765 0.977 (prob. damaging) No items found 1/66,704
2904 TGFBR2 A292T 150/161 Unknown 1.000 (prob. damaging) No items found Not found

Depth: coverage for both affected relatives or (in case of the FBN G343R variant) for a single patient; polyphen: polyphen-2 probability score (and assigned classification); prob. damaging: probably damaging; ClinVar: classification of the variant according to the ClinVar database; conflicting: Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; uncertain: uncertain significance; ExAC allele frequency: observed allele frequency in the non-Finnish European populations of the ExAC database.

To explore the population frequency of deleterious SNVs in the panel of candidate genes, we analyzed SNV-findings from non-Finnish, European populations from the ExAC database. All subjects with nonsense and stop-loss SNVs as well as all “non-benign” missense substitutions with polyphen-2 probability scores ≥0.95 were counted for each of the 11 genes of the selected panel. The non-Finnish European populations of the ExAC database carried a total of 10,138 SNVs causing nonsense, stop-loss or missense substitutions (Table 3). After removal of SNVs that were classified as “benign” or “likely benign”—including two common variants in the MYLK gene—a total of 1782 non-benign variants was found in the control sample.

Table 3.

SNVs in the candidate gene panel identified in CeAD patients and in European control subjects.

Gene Patients (n = 18) All Patients (n = 18) Missense, nonsense, stop-loss Patients (n = 18) Non-benign Families (n = 9) Controls (n = 33,370) All Controls (n = 33,370) Non-benign p (Fisher’s exact test) for comparison of non-benign patients and non-benign controls
ACTA2 10 0 0 0 1 1 1.00
MYH11 231 12 0 0 989 559 0.86
FBN1 116 23 3 1 290 282 0.038
TGFBR1 5 2 0 0 19 16 0.99
TGFBR2 29 2 2 1 167 167 0.044
TGFB2 7 0 0 0 21 21 0.99
COL3A1 90 22 2 1 71 71 0.019
COL4A1 446 34 2 1 410 136 0.036
SMAD3 73 6 0 0 2 2 1.00
MYLK 210 39 0 0 8091 450 0.88
SLC2A10 25 2 0 0 77 77 0.98
Whole gene panel 1242 142 9 4 10,138 1782 0.0008

Note: For the patient sample, columns show all identified exome variants (including synonymous variants, splice variants as well as intronic, 3′ and 5′ UTR variants), all nonsense, stop-loss and missense variants and (third column), nonsense, stop-loss variants as well as missense variants with polyphen-2 probability scores ≥0.95 and with ClinVar classification other than “benign” or likely “benign”. The prioritized variants that were present in both affected relatives of a family were considered as familial. All European non-Finnish carriers of a nonsense or stop-loss variant or of a missense variant with polyphen-2 probability scores ≥0.96 were counted for each of the 11 candidate genes. In a final prioritization step, variants that were classified as “benign” or “likely benign” were not analyzed further.

The finding of four non-benign SNPs in nine families (allele frequency: 4/18 = 22.2%), compared to 1782 findings in 33,370 population controls (allele frequency: 1782/66,740 = 2.7%) suggested that carriers with non-benign SNPs in genes associated with arterial connective tissue disorders were at increased risk for familial CeAD (Table 3; p = 0.0008; odds ratio = 14.2; 95% confidence interval = 3.8–52.9).

Discussion

This analysis of rare deleterious SNVs in a predefined set of candidate genes had the following key findings: (1) non-benign variants in genes associated with inherited arterial connective tissue disorders were observed at low prevalence in the European non-Finnish population, but were about 10 times more frequent in patients with familial CeAD; (2) our study did not identify a single CeAD-specific candidate gene, but observed a polygenic burden of variants across different genes associated with known inherited connective tissue disorders, suggesting genetic heterogeneity of the CeAD phenotype.

Mutations in COL3A1 or TGFBR2 in CeAD patients had been reported in anecdotal case reports,7,13,14 whereas this had been not the case for FBN1 and COL4A1. The FBN1 Arg2554Trp mutation in pedigree 2149 was described before in three family members with atypical Marfan syndrome affecting the cardiovascular system, but neither the eyes nor the skeleton.25 Recently, we found this same Arg2544Trp missense mutation of FBN1 in a young woman with multiple CeAD and arachnoidactily (Baumgartner RW and Grond-Ginsbach C, unpublished data). Mutations in COL4A1 were associated with a broad spectrum of symptoms (HANAC (dominant hereditary angiopathy with nephropathy, aneurysms, and muscle cramps) syndrome), including aneurysms, small vessel disease and hemorrhagic stroke.26 The affected father of family 2953 developed a large dilatative ICA aneurysm secondary to his ICAD, which may be considered as sign of an underlying syndrome.18

No mutations were identified in the remaining four families. Other types of genetic variation may play a role, including small deletions or duplications (indels) causing frame-shift mutations or large structural variant like a deletion covering the whole COL3A1 and COL5A2 genes that was identified in a pilot study of copy number variation (CNV) in CeAD patients.14 Interestingly, a recent follow-up CNV study in a large patients’ sample associated CeAD with genetic variants affecting the development of the vascular system and found such variants in both affected sibs of a family.27 The lack of findings in five families may also indicate that the current panel of 11 candidate genes was too selective or that the cut-off for the prioritization of variants (with polyphen-2 probability scores ≥0.95 and with non-benign ClinVar classification) might have been too stringent.

Familial occurrence of CeAD is rare (i.e.<1%).11,28,29 Hence, the presented sample of nine affected duos with familial CeAD, all white Caucasians from Germany or from the German speaking part of Switzerland, provided a unique material for a genetic analysis. The analysis of a large group of unrelated subjects for the ExAC database for comparison was a further strength of this study. However, we had no information on age, sex or health state of the analyzed ExAC controls. Nevertheless, our study has several limitations: The study sample of patients was small, which reduced the likelihood of recurrent findings in different families. Moreover, the study sample was highly selective, as most CeAD patients are sporadic (i.e. not familial) and familial occurrence of CeAD is in fact exceptional. Sequence analysis of larger series of patients is therefore needed to estimate the contribution of rare genetic variants in the pathogenesis of sporadic CeAD. The variants in this study were prioritized with regard to functionality, but not with regard to frequency. As all prioritized familial variants appeared to be extremely rare in the non-Finnish European controls, it is tempting to reanalyze the frequency of non-benign variants in the control population after exclusion of common variants. Prioritization of rare variants in the ExAC sample would suggest an even more dramatic enrichment of variants in the familial CeAD patients (data not shown).

Conclusion

CeAD families showed enrichment for deleterious variants in genes associated with arterial connective tissue disorders. The observation that findings were identical within each family but different across families indicates genetic heterogeneity of CeAD.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Werner Hacke for continuous support, Dr Tim Strom for valuable advice, and Inge Werner for excellent technical assistance.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MD received funding from the Vascular Dementia Research Foundation; this research was partly supported by the Basel Stroke Funds and the Neurological Clinic of the University Hospital Basel.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by relevant local authorities in all participating centers and complied with all national regulations concerning ethics committee approval and informed consent.

Informed Consent

All patients gave written informed consent prior to study participation

Guarantor

CG-G.

Contributorship

CGG, MD, and STE conceived the study. TB, MK, PL, CT, PE, JJM, AA, AS, GRF, AT, JM, and RWB were involved in patient recruitment. CGG, SSA, PE, and STE interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version.

References

  • 1.Debette S, Leys D. Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 668–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Engelter ST, Traenka C, Von Hessling A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical artery dissection. Neurol Clin 2015; 33: 421–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goeggel Simonetti B, Mono ML, Huynh-Do U, et al. Risk factors, aetiology and outcome of ischaemic stroke in young adults: the Swiss Young Stroke Study (SYSS). J Neurol 2015; 262: 2025–2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Engelter ST, Grond-Ginsbach C, Metso TM, et al. Cervical artery dissection – trauma and other potential mechanical trigger events. Neurology 2013; 80: 1950–1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Debette S, Metso T, Pezzini A, et al. Association of vascular risk factors with cervical artery dissection and ischemic stroke in young adults. Circulation 2011; 123: 1537–1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grond-Ginsbach C, Debette S, Pezzini A. Genetic approaches in the study of risk factors for cervical artery dissection. Front Neurol Neurosci 2005; 20: 30–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Debette S, Kamatani Y, Metso TM, et al. Common variation in PHACTR1 is associated with susceptibility to cervical artery dissection. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 78–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Giossi A, Ritelli M, Costa P, et al. Connective tissue anomalies in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Neurology 2014; 83: 2032–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brandt T, Orberk E, Weber R, et al. Pathogenesis of cervical artery dissections: association with connective tissue abnormalities. Neurology 2001; 57: 24–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grond-Ginsbach C, Debette S. The association of connective tissue disorders with cervical artery dissections. Curr Mol Med 2009; 9: 210–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Debette S, Goeggel Simonetti B, Schilling S, et al. Familial occurrence and heritable connective tissue disorders in cervical artery dissection. Neurology 2014; 83: 2023–2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuivaniemi H, Prockop DJ, Wu Y, et al. Exclusion of mutations in the gene for type III collagen (COL3A1) as a common cause of intracranial aneurysms or cervical artery dissections: results from sequence analysis of the coding sequences of type III collagen from 55 unrelated patients. Neurology 1993; 43: 2652–2658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pezzini A, Drera B, Del Zotto E, et al. Mutations in TGFBR2 gene cause spontaneous cervical artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2011; 82: 1372–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grond-Ginsbach C, Chen B, Pjontek R, et al. Copy number variation in patients with cervical artery dissection. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 1295–1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Milewicz DM, Carlson AA, Regalado ES. Genetic testing in aortic aneurysm disease: PRO. Cardiol Clin 2010; 28: 191–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Plaisier E, Chen Z, Gekeler F, et al. Novel COL4A1 mutations associated with HANAC syndrome: a role for the triple helical CB3[IV] domain. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A: 2550–2555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pomianowski P, Elefteriades JA. The genetics and genomics of thoracic aortic disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2: 271–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vanakker OM, Hemelsoet D, De Paepe A. Hereditary connective tissue diseases in young adult stroke: a comprehensive synthesis. Stroke Res Treat 2011; 2011: 712903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 2016; 536: 285–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Karczewski KJ, Weisburd B, Thomas B, et al. The ExAC browser: displaying reference data information from over 60 000 exomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2016 (in press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Martin JJ, Hausser I, Lyrer P, et al. Familial cervical artery dissections: clinical, morphologic, and genetic studies. Stroke 2006; 37: 2924–2929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grond-Ginsbach C, de Freitas GR, Campos CR, et al. Familial occurrence of cervical artery dissection – Coincidence or sign of familial predisposition? Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 33: 466–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17: 405–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44: D862–D868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Comeglio P, Johnson P, Arno G, et al. The importance of mutation detection in Marfan syndrome and Marfan-related disorders: report of 193 FBN1 mutations. Hum Mutat 2007; 28: 928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meuwissen ME, Halley DJ, Smit LS, et al. The expanding phenotype of COL4A1 and COL4A2 mutations: clinical data on 13 newly identified families and a review of the literature. Genet Med 2015; 17: 843–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grond-Ginsbach C, Chen B, Krawczak M, et al. Genetic imbalance in patients with cervical artery dissection. Current Genomics 2017; 18: 206–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kloss M, Grond-Ginsbach C, Pezzini A, et al. Stroke in first-degree relatives of patients with cervical artery dissection. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21: 1102–1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thijs V, Grittner U, Dichgans M, et al. Family history in young patients with stroke. Stroke 2015; 46: 1975–1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Stroke Journal are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES