Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2019 Apr 2;10:641. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00641

Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Pasteurized Milk in China

Jingsha Dai 1,†, Shi Wu 1,†, Jiahui Huang 1,†, Qingping Wu 1,*, Feng Zhang 1,2, Jumei Zhang 1, Juan Wang 3, Yu Ding 4, Shuhong Zhang 1, Xiaojuan Yang 1, Tao Lei 1, Liang Xue 1, Haoming Wu 1
PMCID: PMC6454862  PMID: 31001225

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important food-borne pathogens globally. It produces various toxins and invasive enzymes and can be found in numerous food products. Milk is an important source of staphylococcal food poisoning. After pasteurization, this microorganism or its enterotoxins might still remain in pasteurized milk. Therefore, this study was to investigate the contamination of S. aureus in 258 pasteurized milk from 39 cities of China. The prevalence and levels of S. aureus in these samples as well as antibiotic susceptibility profiles, virulence genes, biofilm formation, and biofilm related genes, spa typing and MLST were used to determine the characterization among the isolates. It was found 3.9% of samples were detected S. aureus in 8 of 39 cities in China. The contaminated level were not very excessive which showed the MPN values of the most positive samples (9/10) were less than 1 MPN/g. All pasteurized milk-related S. aureus isolates have ability to produce biofilm and harbored icaA, icaD, eno, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, fib genes, other biofilm related genes icaC were showed in 91.7% of isolates and cna gene were showed in 50%, except bap gene which were free in all isolates. The antibiotic susceptibility test showed that all isolates were resistant or intermediate-resistant to different concentrations of the antibiotics. Furthermore, 75.0% of the isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotic classes, which indicated multidrug resistance. The isolates had virulence potential, which showed 66.7% (8/12) of the isolates carried one or more virulence-associated genes. Molecular typing by MLST and spa typing enabled classification of these isolates into a total of 11 sequence types (STs) and spa types, which indicated high genetic diversity. Most of these types were related to various clinical S. aureus infections. Thus, the findings of this study reflect the potential risk of S. aureus infection in China. Our study also provides comprehensive analysis of the prevalence of S. aureus in pasteurized milk and helps ensure more accurate treatment of human infection with effective antibiotics.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, pasteurized milk, risk assessment, virulence genes, antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, MLST, spa typing

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen associated with serious community and hospital-acquired diseases. It has low nutritional requirements and widely exists in nature. In China, microbial food poisoning accounted for 53.7% of food poisoning emergencies in 2015. Of which, S. aureus was an important pathogenic factor in these cases (Wu et al., 2018a). In the United States, S. aureus causes approximately 241,000 cases of food poisoning each year (Scallan et al., 2011; Kadariya et al., 2014). This foodborne pathogen is considered as one of the world’s leading causes of disease outbreaks related to food consumption, being responsible for a variety of manifestations and diseases (Jamali et al., 2015).

Staphylococcus aureus produces a variety of toxins and invasive enzymes such as staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), hemolysins, Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), plasma coagulase, and deoxyribonuclease (Spanu et al., 2012). Differentiation between virulent and non-virulent strains is significant for evaluating the potential implications of the presence of this microorganism for food safety and public health. In which, SEs are active at concentrations ranging from high nanogram to low microgram quantities (Larkin et al., 2009) and are resistant to conditions (heat treatment, low pH) that retaining their activity in the digestive tract after ingestion (Evenson et al., 1988; Argudín et al., 2010). In addition, TSST-1 is a superantigenic exotoxin that causes toxic shock syndrome and PVL is a bacteriophage-encoded bicomponent leukotoxin that is in some strains of S. aureus and plays a key role in leukocytolysis and tissue necrosis (Shallcross et al., 2013). S. aureus often develops antibiotic resistance. Isolation of single- or multiple-drug resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains from food, the environment, and clinics has been constantly reported (Gould et al., 2012; Rasigade et al., 2014). The ability of S. aureus to form biofilms helps the bacterium to survive in hostile environments within the host and is considered to be responsible for chronic or persistent infections (Costerton et al., 1999). The ability of some strains to synthesize biofilms could increase their pathogenicity since established biofilms can tolerate antimicrobial agents, thus making the bacterium extremely difficult to eradicate (Zmantar et al., 2010).

Nowadays, molecular typing methods are crucial in epidemiological investigations of food processing and enhance the resolution of surveillance (Wu et al., 2015). Of various subtyping approaches, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a widely accepted method of DNA sequence based typing that based on analysis of relatively conserved genes that encode essential proteins. For S. aureus, the level of discrimination provided by MLST is sufficient to provide a relatively detailed picture of the global dissemination of the organism (Saunders and Holmes, 2007). spa typing is another efficient typing method for S. aureus, it based on sequencing of the polymorphic X region of the protein A gene (spa) (Hallin et al., 2009). Similar to MLST, it suggests that spa typing is suitable for epidemiology and evolutionary investigations based on studies of European and international isolates (Wu et al., 2018b).

Milk is an important source of staphylococcal food poisoning. There are several foodborne outbreaks of S. aureus intoxications have been documented to be associated with consumption of contaminated milk (De Buyser et al., 1985; Miwa et al., 2001; Fetsch et al., 2014). In addition, raw milk and raw milk products are frequently contaminated with different types of S. aureus around the world (Tham et al., 1990; Rosengren et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2010; Jamali et al., 2015; Riva et al., 2015). Milk is a good substrate for S. aureus growth and enterotoxin production. Enterotoxins can retain their biological activity after pasteurization (Asao et al., 2003; Rall et al., 2008). In China, studies have reported that some S. aureus strains persist in powdered infant formula (Wang et al., 2012). Currently, only a few full-scale and systematic studies have been performed on S. aureus prevalence and contamination levels in pasteurized milk in China. This study aimed to investigate S. aureus contamination in pasteurized milk obtained from different Chinese cities. For this purpose, we analyzed the S. aureus prevalence and contamination levels, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, virulence genes, biofilm formation, biofilm-related genes, spa typing results, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) results to characterize the isolates.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

From July 2011 to June 2016, a total of 258 pasteurized milk samples were collected from supermarkets, fairs, and farmers’ markets (Supplementary Table 1). The samples were obtained from 39 cities located in a total of 29 provinces and 2 directly controlled municipalities in China, which covered most of the provincial capitals of China (Supplementary Figure 1). The samples were placed in a cold box at approximately 4°C, tightly sealed with sterile plastic wrap, transported to an accredited laboratory, and subjected to microbiological analysis within 24 h.

Isolation and Detection

The samples were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed to detect S. aureus. For qualitative analysis, samples were examined according to GB 4789.30-2010 (National Food Safety Standards of China) with slight modification. The most probable number (MPN) method was used for quantitative analysis. Approximately 25 g of the food sample was homogenized in 225 mL tryptic soy broth with 10% sodium chloride (Huankai, Guangzhou, China). Subsequently, 1-mL, 0.1-mL, and 0.01-mL aliquots were transferred to tubes containing 9, 10, and 10 mL in triplicate with trypticase soy broth (Huankai) supplemented with 10% NaCl. The tubes were then incubated at 37°C for 48 h.

A loopful of enrichment broth culture (10 μL) was streaked onto chromogenic S. aureus agar plates (Huankai) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Of the colonies obtained, 1–4 pink colonies were purified on nutrient agar medium. The purified colonies were analyzed via the coagulase activity test involving freeze-dried rabbit plasma (Huankai), and the API STAPH test strips (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) were then used. The MPN value was determined on the basis of the number of positive tube(s) in each of the three sets using the MPN table.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method was used to test antibiotic susceptibility, and diameter interpretations were based on the protocol specified in the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] (2015). S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were used as quality control organisms. All isolates were assessed for antimicrobial susceptibility to 24 antibiotics (Oxoid, United Kingdom): amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cefepime, cefoxitin, penicillin G, ceftazidime, amikacin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, telithromycin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, tetracycline, linezolid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1:19), rifampicin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, teicoplanin, nitrofurantoin, and fusidic acid. The CLSI zone diameter breakpoints were used to interpret the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the analyzed strains.

In vivo Biofilm Formation

Biofilm production was quantified using a microtiter plate assay (MPA) described previously (Vasudevan et al., 2003), with slight modifications. S. aureus strains were individually grown at 37°C overnight in brain heart infusion broth (BHI). The overnight culture was diluted 1:100 in fresh BHI, and 200-μL aliquots of each prepared suspension were transferred into three wells of 96-well tissue culture treated polystyrene microplates (CELLSTAR® Cell Culture Microplates, Greiner Bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany). After cultivation at 37°C for 48 h, the wells were washed three times with 200 mL sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and dried at room temperature. The adherent bacterial cells were fixed with 200 μL methanol for 15 min, and the plates were emptied and left to dry overnight. The adherent cells were then stained with 1% crystal violet for 10 min and washed twice with water. The dye bound to the adherent cells was dissolved with 150 mL 95% ethanol and optical density (OD) was measured at 590 nm with a spectrophotometer (SpectroStar Nano, BMG Labtech). Uninoculated wells containing BHI served as blanks. Blank-corrected absorbance values of S. aureus strains were used for reporting biofilm production. Isolates were considered biofilm producers when their OD values were three times greater than the standard deviation of the mean Dc. Additionally, isolates showing biofilm-producing ability were classified as weak (Dc < OD ≤ 2 × Dc), moderate (2 × Dc < OD ≤ 4 × Dc), or strong (OD > 4 × Dc) biofilm producers.

DNA Extraction and PCR

After the isolates were cultivated for at 37°C 24 h in BHI, genomic DNA was extracted using a Genomic DNA Extraction kit (Magen Biotech, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic DNA concentration was determined at 260 nm by using a NanoDrop-ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States). The mecA/mecC gene, which confers methicillin resistance to S. aureus, was detected by PCR performed using primers described previously (Perez-Roth et al., 2001; Stegger et al., 2012). PCR was also used to detect the presence of virulence genes. The detection of 18 SE genes (sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, sej, sek, sel, sem, sen, seo, sep, seq, ser, and seu), the tsst gene and the presence of lukSF-PV (pvl) genes was performed as previously described (Jarraud et al., 2002; Varshney et al., 2009). For adhesion genes (clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, fib, and cna) and biofilm-producing genes (icaA, icaD, icaC, bap, and eno), PCR was performed according to previous studies (Zmantar et al., 2010; Artini et al., 2013; Salaberry et al., 2015; Pereyra et al., 2016). The primer sequences used in the PCR assays, expected amplified product sizes, and references are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The amplicons were stained with Goldview, loaded onto 1.5% agarose gels, electrophoresed at 120 V for 0.5 h, and visualized by a UV transilluminator gel imaging system (GE Healthcare, WI, United States). The images were saved as TIFF files for analysis.

Molecular Typing

All the isolates were characterized by MLST and spa typing. The MLST analysis was based on DNA sequencing of the seven housekeeping genes arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqil, as described previously (Enright et al., 2000). The primers spa-1113f (5′-TAA AGA CGA TCC TTC GGT GAG C-3′) and spa-1514r (5′-CAG CAG TAG TGC CGT TTG CTT-3′) were used for spa amplification (Shopsin et al., 1999). The PCR products were purified with a PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Genmany) and were sequenced in both directions with Big Dye fluorescent terminators on an ABI 3730XL sequencer (Applied BioSystems). For each MLST locus, an allele number was assigned to each distinct sequence variant, and a distinct sequence type (ST) number was attributed to each distinct combination of alleles for the seven genes. STs were determined using the S. aureus MLST database.1 Clonal complex (CC) analysis was performed using eBURST v.3 as previously described (Feil et al., 2004). The spa types were randomly assigned using the SpaServer website.2 Sequence Type Analysis and Recombinational Tests software (S.T.A.R.T. ver. 2; https://pubmlst.org/software/analysis/start2) was used to analyze the MLST data.

Results

Isolation and Identification of S. aureus From Pasteurized Milk

Of the 258 pasteurized milk samples, 10 samples were contaminated with coagulase-positive staphylococci, and 12 isolates obtained from these positive samples were confirmed as S. aureus by the API STAPH test. The qualitative and quantitative results for these positive samples are shown in Table 1. Overall, the mean prevalence of S. aureus was 3.9%, and the MPN values for the samples showing the highest levels (9/10) were less than 1 MPN/g. Positive samples were obtained from 8 of the 39 Chinese cities included (Supplementary Figure 1): 33.3% of the positive samples were from Zhanjiang and Xining cities, and 16.7% were obtained from the other six cities, respectively. Besides, among the different types of sampling source, the positive samples isolated from fairs was 4.2% (6/144) followed by farmer’s market (3.8%, 1/26) and supermarkets (3.4%, 3/88).

Table 1.

Prevalence and contamination levels of Staphylococcus aureus in pasteurized milk samples from China.

Positive number Positive sample Sampling site Source Quantitative methods
 Qualitative methods
MPN values (MPN/g)
1 ZJJ376 Zhanjiang Fair 0.92 +
2 ZJC1758 Zhanjiang Supermarket <0.3 +
3 FZJ2233 Fuzhou Fair 24 +
4 XMJ2333 Xiamen Fair 0.36 +
5 LZN1142 Lanzhou Farmer‘s market <0.3 +
6 XNC3008 Xining Supermarket 0.3 +
7 XNJ3032 Xining Fair 0.3 +
8 XGJ3532 Hongkong Fair 0.75 +
9 GYC3608 Guiyang Supermarket <0.3 +
10 HHHTJ4032 Huhehaote Fair 0.74 +
Open in a new tab

Antibiotic Resistance

Most S. aureus isolates showed resistance and intermediate resistance to different antibiotics concentrations. The resistance patterns of S. aureus to the tested antimicrobial agents are presented in Table 2. The phenotypic resistance profiles of the S. aureus isolates are as follows: ampicillin, 97.7%; penicillin G, 83.3%; erythromycin, 50.0%; kanamycin, 41.7%; telithromycin, 33.3%; clindamycin, 33.3%; gentamicin, 33.3%; tetracycline, 33.3%; norfloxacin, 25.0%; ciprofloxacin, 16.7%; amikacin, 16.7%; rifampicin, 16.7%; chloramphenicol, 8.3%; fusidic acid, 16.7%; ceftazidime, 8.3%; streptomycin, 8.3%; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 8.3%; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1:19), 8.3% and quinupristin/dalfopristin, 8.3%. All the isolates were susceptible to cefepime, cefoxitin, linezolid, and nitrofurantoin. The mecA/mecC gene was free in all S. aureus isolates. Combining with antibiotic resistance test, there was none of MRSA isolates identified. However, only one isolate was susceptible to all the antimicrobial agents tested, whereas two isolates were resistant to two antibiotics and 75.0% of isolates (9/12) were resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics which showed multi-drug resistance including one strain Sta1758 were resistant to more than 10 antibiotics.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests for Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from pasteurized milk samples from China.

Antibiotics S. aureus (n = 12)
No. of resistant strains (%) No. of intermediate-resistance strains (%) No. of susceptible strains (%)
β-Lactams Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid 1 (8.3%) – 11 (97.7%)
Ampicillin 11 (97.7%) – 1 (8.3%)
Cefepime 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%)
Cefoxitin 0 (0%) – 12 (100%)
Penicillin G 10 (83.3) – 2 (16.7%)
Ceftazidime 1 (8.3%) 2 (16.7%) 9 (75.5%)
Aminoglycosides Amikacin 2 (16.7%) 2 (16.7%) 8 (66.7%)
Gentamicin 4 (33.3%) – 8 (66.7%)
Kanamycin 5 (41.7%) 2 (16.7%) 5 (41.7%)
Streptomycin 1 (8.3%) 8 (66.7%) 3 (25.0%)
Phenicols Chloramphenicol 1 (8.3%) 3 (25.0%) 8 (66.7%)
Lincosamides Clindamycin 4 (33.3%) 1 (8.3%) 7 (58.3%)
Macrolides Erythromycin 6 (50.0%) 1 (8.3%) 5 (41.7%)
Telithromycin 4 (33.3%) 3 (25.0%) 5 (41.7%)
Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin 2 (16.7%) 5 (41.7%) 5 (41.7%)
Norfloxacin 3 (25.0%) 3 (25.0%) 6 (50.0%)
Tetracyclines Tetracycline 4 (33.3%) – 8 (66.7%)
Oxazolidinones Linezolid 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%)
Ansamycins Rifampicin 2 (16.7%) 1 (8.3%) 9 (75.0%)
Sulfonamides Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1:19) 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 11 (97.7%)
Quinolones Quinupristin/dalfopristin 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 11 (97.7%)
Glycopeptides Teicoplanin 0 (0%) 2 (16.7%) 10 (83.3%)
Nitrofurantoins Nitrofurantoin 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%)
Fusidic acid 2 (16.7%) – 10 (83.3%)
Open in a new tab

In vitro Biofilm Production and Presence of Biofilm-Related Genes

The MPA results showed that all the S. aureus strains could produce biofilms, including four isolates (33.3%, 4/12) showing moderate and eight isolates (76.7%, 8/12) showing strong biofilm formation (Table 3). Table 3 also provides the results for the presence of S. aureus adhesion and biofilm-associated genes. Overall, icaA, icaD, eno, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, and fib were found in all 12 isolates, whereas the bap gene was free in all isolates. In addition, icaC was present in 91.7% (11/12) of the isolates and the cna gene in 50% (6/12). Thus, most of the biofilm-producing genes and adhesion genes were present in these S. aureus strains isolated from the pasteurized milk samples.

Table 3.

Biofilm-formation ability and biofilm-associated genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from pasteurized milk samples.

No. S. aureus isolates Biofilm production assay Biofilm production abilitya biofilm-producing genes
 adhesion genes
icaA icaD icaC bap eno clfA clfB fnbA fnbB fib cna
1 Sta376 1.4715 +++ + + + - + + + + + + +
2 Sta1758 0.5147 ++ + + + - + + + + + + -
3 Sta2233-0 1.2700 +++ + + + - + + + + + + -
4 Sta2333-0 0.8515 ++ + + + - + + + + + + -
5 Sta1142 1.1548 +++ + + + - + + + + + + +
6 Sta3008C2 0.5417 ++ + + + - + + + + + + +
7 Sta3032 0.6850 ++ + + + - + + + + + + +
8 Sta3032C3 1.1167 +++ + + - - + + + + + + -
9 Sta3532 1.0995 +++ + + + - + + + + + + -
10 Sta3608 2.5659 +++ + + + - + + + + + + -
11 Sta4032B2 2.6347 +++ + + + - + + + + + + +
12 Sta4032B3 2.7753 +++ + + + - + + + + + + +
Open in a new tab

aQuantification of biofilm formation by optical density (OD) analysis: (+++): strong biofilm producers (OD590 > 0.88), (++): moderate biofilm producers (0.44 > OD590 > 0.88), (+): weak biofilm producers (0.22 > OD590 > 0.44).

Prevalence of Virulence-Associated Genes

The prevalence of virulence-associated genes is shown in Figure 1. Of the S. aureus isolates analyzed, 66.7% (8/12) carried one or more virulence-associated genes. Of the 20 virulence genes investigated, seg, sei, and sem were most frequently detected which showed 41.7% of prevalence, respectively. sea, seb, sed, see, seu, seq, sej, ser, sek, and pvl were not detected in the S. aureus isolates. The prevalence of the other virulence genes is as follows: sen (25%), sec (16.7%), sel (16.7%), seo (8.3%), sep (8.3%), seh (8.3%), and tsst (8.3%). Staphylococcal enterotoxin genes can be divided into classic SE genes (sea, seb, sec, sed, and see), egc cluster genes (seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, and seu), and other novel SE genes (sep, seq, she, sej, sel, ser, and sek). From the classic SE genes, only two isolates showed the sec gene, that is 7.7% (2/26) prevalence in the detected genes. The egc cluster accounted for 73.1% (19/26) of the detected genes, and other novel SE genes accounted for 15.4%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Staphylococcal toxin gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from pasteurized milk.

Molecular Characterization of S. aureus Isolates

MLST analysis of the 12 isolates yielded 11 STs showing high genetic diversity. Except ST188 was found in two strains, the other STs were present in single strains which included ST1, ST5, ST7, ST9, ST12, ST15, ST25, ST72, ST398, and ST4069. Of these, ST4069 was a newly assigned ST, which found a single-locus variant (SLV) on the aroE gene (assigned as aroE-472). spa typing showed results similar to those of MLST. Eleven spa types were detected: t189 was found in two strains, and t177, t899, t213, t3092, t148, t091, t002, t085, t078, and t034 were found in single isolates. The phylogenetic tree based on the seven concatenated MLST sequences in Figure 2 shows the relatedness between these isolates. ST188 correlated well with t189, which was also found in city of Xining.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree of the 7 multilocus sequence typing loci of S. aureus isolates obtained from pasteurized milk. This tree was generated using S.T.A.R.T. (version 2).

Discussion

Pasteurization, or heat treatment, of milk is an important milestone in for public health and has contributed to a dramatic decline in many infectious diseases. However, outbreaks associated with pasteurized milk continue to occur (Ryan et al., 1987; Dalton et al., 1997; Ackers et al., 2000). In China, milk has become an important component of a balanced diet, and the annual per capita milk consumption increased from 9.23 kg in 1992 to 24.87 kg in 2007 (Qian et al., 2011; Liu and Wang, 2013). SFP outbreaks associated with milk have occurred occasionally (Dai et al., 2009). There were limited researches on the prevalence of S. aureus from pasteurized milk in China. In the current study, 3.9% of the samples showed the presence of S. aureus. Compare with other countries’ studies, the prevalence of S. aureus from pasteurized milk in our study is lower. In Brazil, Rall et al. (2008) collected 162 raw and pasteurized milk samples and found 20.4% of the pasteurized milk samples were positive for S. aureus. In 2006, Gündoğan et al. (2006) analyzed 180 raw milk, pasteurized milk, and ice cream samples; 56.6% of the pasteurized milk samples were positive for S. aureus. However, it is maybe attribute to the sample sizes, sample source or geographic locations, which showed most of these S. aureus were isolated from farm, whereas our samples were collected from supermarkets, fairs or farmer’s markets. Quantitative analysis by MPN showed that only one S. aureus–positive sample reached a level of 10 MPN/g. In China, a limit of 100 CFU/g (mL) has been proposed for S. aureus in milk and the highest fraction of samples with values that exceeded this limit was observed at the end of food shelf-life (Helwigh and Korsgaard, 2007). Thus, the currently available data, along with our study, indicate that levels of S. aureus in pasteurized milk in China are not very high.

Staphylococcal enterotoxins are responsible for most SFP outbreaks (Dinges et al., 2000; Loir et al., 2003). This could account for retention of biological activity after pasteurization. This study was investigated the 18 SE genes among pasteurized milk related S. aureus isolates and found that 66.7% of the isolates carried one or more SE genes, suggesting the risk of S. aureus contamination in pasteurized milk in China. This rate is higher than that reported in a previous study (Chao et al., 2015) in which the prevalence of 18 SE genes was studied in S. aureus isolates obtained from different origins in China, showing that 54.4% of those isolates harbored SE genes. Generally, the sea gene has been the most common gene in the SFP outbreak isolates tested, followed by the sed gene from classic SE genes (Kérouanton et al., 2007), but they were not detected in the current study. sec was the only classical SE gene detected in our study, which is the most commonly occurring SE in milk (Lindqvist et al., 2002; Scherrer et al., 2004; Aragon-Alegro et al., 2007). In 2002, an outbreak of community-acquired foodborne illness caused by MRSA was attributed to SEC-containing coleslaw, which was produced in the United States (Jones et al., 2002). In addition, we observed higher prevalence of seg-sei-sem among the isolates in our study, these SE genes belonged to the egc cluster, which is widely distributed in clinical isolates and acts as a putative nursery of enterotoxin genes (Jarraud et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2018b). Thus, the hazard posed by these isolates harboring SE genes should not be ignored.

In the current study, all S. aureus strains obtained from pasteurized milk samples could produce biofilms and showed moderate or strong biofilm production capability. In addition, various genes have been reported to be involve in biofilm formation, of these genes the ica group genes especially icaA and icaD (Arciola et al., 2001) and the other group such as fnbA, fnbB, cna and eno genes that encode MSCRAMMs proteins (Atshan et al., 2012) are noticeable. Most of these genes were present in the S. aureus strains isolated from our samples. This result were similar with the research by Atshan et al. (2012) who detected 9 MSCRAMM and 4 biofilm related genes in the MSSA and MRSA isolates from clinically patients by PCR method and found fnbA, eno, ebpS, clfA, clfB, icaA, icaD, icaB, and icaC genes were detected in 100% of isolates. Furthermore, fib and cna were detected in 90% and 46.6% MSSA isolates, respectively, which is in agreement with our result. In our study, the bap gene was free in all S. aureus isolates. Many studies have reported that the bap gene was not detected or very low rates in the solutes studied (Melchior et al., 2007; Szweda et al., 2012; Khoramrooz et al., 2016; Pereyra et al., 2016; Felipe et al., 2017). Although there was inconclusive evidence for the correlation between phenotypic tests and the detection of specific genes associated with adhesion and biofilm formation, the presence of icaA, icaD, icaC, fnbA, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnb, and fib genes indicated a significant association with biofilm formation in this study. The biofilm production in isolates with negative results for any of the genes studied may be attributable to other biofilm-related genes.

Antimicrobial resistance was noted in pasteurized milk related S. aureus isolates. Most of the isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent. However, resistance to ampicillin and penicillin was higher than that reported in many previous studies involving S. aureus isolates from dairy samples (Rosengren et al., 2010; Jamali et al., 2015; Riva et al., 2015). We also observed that 25.0% of the isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics such as ampicillin, gentamicin, kanamycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and telithromycin. These were similar to the study by Jamali et al.’ investigation, which showed the resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates from raw milk and dairy products for tetracycline, penicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, streptomycin, kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin (Jamali et al., 2015). Furthermore, many isolates were found intermediate-resistant to the selected antibiotics in this study. The reduced antibiotic susceptibility of these antibiotics suggests that these bacteria may be exposed to such antimicrobials for a long time (Howden et al., 2010). Thus, it should draw public attention and controlled use of antimicrobials would limit the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria.

MLST and spa genotyping have shown a highly clonal population structure for S. aureus in many studies (Kanika et al., 2011; Fetsch et al., 2014; Basanisi et al., 2017). The S. aureus MLST database3 currently has 5024 different STs. However, some STs are specific to a particular source. For example, ST398 occurs in livestock-associated S. aureus; ST5, ST45, and ST239 have been detected in hospital-associated S. aureus infections; and ST1, ST8, ST30, and ST59 are often related to community-associated S. aureus infections (Bens et al., 2006; Cui and Li, 2009; Neela et al., 2009; Skov, 2009; Deleo et al., 2010). Generally, spa typing showed highly concordant with MLST. In the current study, MLST and spa typing enabled classification of pasteurized milk related S. aureus isolates into 11 types (ST188-t189, ST1-t177, ST9-899, ST12-t213, ST72-t3092, ST7-t091, ST5-t002, ST15-t085, ST25-t078, ST398-t034, and ST4069-t148). Most of these STs were detected in various of samples and relevant to a variety of clinical S. aureus infections (Krziwanek et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2012; Schaumburg et al., 2015). Therefore, the hazards of these strains for consumers cannot be ignored.

Conclusion

To conclude, our results provide information regarding the genetic background of S. aureus strains obtained from pasteurized milk samples in China. To our knowledge, our study is the first systematic investigation of prevalence and contamination levels for S. aureus isolated from pasteurized milk samples in China. Different source strains showed different types in this study. These isolates had virulence potential, which half of them carried enterotoxin genes and infection-related molecular type. The resistance patterns can help determine more appropriate treatments for human infections in China. All the isolates had moderate or strong biofilm-production capability, and most of them harbored biofilm-related genes, indicating that these potentially virulent bacteria could persist in the food-manufacturing environment.

Author Contributions

QW, JZ, JD, SW, and JH conceived and designed the experiments. JD, JH, and FZ performed the experiments. JD, SW, HW, and TL analyzed the data. XY, LX, YD, SZ, and JW contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. SW, JD, and QW contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. We would like to acknowledge the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31801657), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M612623), and GDAS’ Special Project of Science and Technology Development (2017GDASCX-0201, 2017GDASCX-0817).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00641/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (991.9KB, docx)

References

  1. Ackers M. L., Schoenfeld S., Markman J., Smith M. G., Nicholson M. A., Dewitt W., et al. (2000). An outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica O:8 infections associated with pasteurized milk. J. Infect. Dis. 181 1834–1837. 10.1086/315436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aragon-Alegro L. C., Konta E. M., Suzuki K., Silva M. G., Júnior A. F., Rall R., et al. (2007). Occurrence of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus in various food products commercialized in Botucatu, SP, Brazil and detection of toxins from food and isolated strains. Food Control 18 630–634. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arciola C. R., Baldassarri L., Montanaro L. (2001). Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39 2151–2156. 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Argudín M. Á, Mendoza M. C., Rodicio M. R. (2010). Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins 2 1751–1773. 10.3390/toxins2071751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Artini M., Papa R., Scoarughi G. L., Galano E., Barbato G., Pucci P., et al. (2013). Comparison of the action of different proteases on virulence properties related to the staphylococcal surface. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114 266–277. 10.1111/jam.12038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asao T., Kumeda Y., Kawai T., Shibata T., Oda H., Haruki K., et al. (2003). An extensive outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning due to low-fat milk in Japan: estimation of enterotoxin A in the incriminated milk and powdered skim milk. Epidemiol. Infect. 130 33–40. 10.1017/S0950268802007951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Atshan S. S., Shamsudin M. N., Sekawi Z., Lung L. T. T., Hamat R. A., Karunanidhi A., et al. (2012). Prevalence of adhesion and regulation of biofilm-related genes in different clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012:976972. 10.1155/2012/976972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Basanisi M. G., Bella G. L., Nobili G., Franconieri I., Salandra G. L. (2017). Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from milk and dairy products in South Italy. Food Microbiol. 62:141. 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bens C. C., Voss A., Klaassen C. H. (2006). Presence of a novel DNA methylation enzyme in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with pig farming leads to uninterpretable results in standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44 1875–1876. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1875-1876.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chao G., Bao G., Cao Y., Yan W., Yan W., Zhang X., et al. (2015). Prevalence and diversity of enterotoxin genes with genetic background of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different origins in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 211:142. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] (2015). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. Approved Standard-M02-A12. Wayne, PA: The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar]
  12. Costerton J. W., Stewart P. S., Greenberg E. P. (1999). Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284 1318–1322. 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui S., Li J. C. (2009). Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine and workers in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 64 680–683. 10.1093/jac/dkp275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dai C. F., Wen J., Lu X. U., Huang G. X., Sun H., Hu Z. K., et al. (2009). Investigation of a case on milk product poisoning caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Chin. J. Food Hyg. 03 262–264. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dalton C. B., Austin C. C., Sobel J., Hayes P. S., Bibb W. F., Graves L. M., et al. (1997). An outbreak of gastroenteritis and fever due to Listeria monocytogenes in milk. N. Engl. J. Med. 336 100–105. 10.1056/NEJM199701093360204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. De Buyser M., Janin F., Dilasser F. (1985). Contamination of ewe cheese with Staphylococcus aureus: study of an outbreak of food poisoning. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie Mikrobiologie Hygiene 14 677–678. [Google Scholar]
  17. Deleo F. R., Otto M., Kreiswirth B. N., Chambers H. F. (2010). Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 375 767–768. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61370-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dinges M. M., Orwin P. M., Schlievert P. M. (2000). Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13 16–34. 10.1128/CMR.13.1.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Enright M. C., Day N. P. J., Davies C. E., Peacock S. J., Spratt B. G. (2000). Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38 1008–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Evenson M. L., Hinds M. W., Bernstein R. S., Bergdoll M. S. (1988). Estimation of human dose of staphylococcal enterotoxin A from a large outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning involving chocolate milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 7 311–316. 10.1016/0168-1605(88)90057-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Feil E. J., Li B. C., Aanensen D. M., Hanage W. P., Spratt B. G. (2004). eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol. 186 1518–1530. 10.1128/JB.186.5.1518-1530.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Felipe V., Morgante C. A., Somale P. S., Varroni F., Zingaretti M. L., Bachetti R. A., et al. (2017). Evaluation of the biofilm forming ability and its associated genes in Staphylococcus species isolates from bovine mastitis in Argentinean dairy farms. Microb. Pathog. 104 278–286. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.01.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fetsch A., Contzen M., Hartelt K., Kleiser A., Maassen S., Rau J., et al. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus food-poisoning outbreak associated with the consumption of ice-cream. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 187:1. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gould I. M., David M. Z., Esposito S., Garau J., Lina G., Mazzei T., et al. (2012). New insights into meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pathogenesis, treatment and resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Ageing 39:96. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gündoğan N., Citak S., Turan E. (2006). Slime production, DNase activity and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk, pasteurised milk and ice cream samples. Food Control 17 389–392. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hallin M., Friedrich A. W., Struelens M. J. (2009). spa typing for epidemiological surveillance of Staphylococcus aureus. Methods Mol. Biol. 551:189. 10.1007/978-1-60327-999-4_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Helwigh B., Korsgaard H. (2007). The Community Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents, Antimicrobial Resistance and Foodborne Outbreaks in the European Union in 2006. Parma: European Food Safety Authority. [Google Scholar]
  28. Howden B. P., Davies J. K., Johnson P. D. R., Stinear T. P., Grayson M. L. (2010). Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23 99–139. 10.1128/CMR.00042-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jamali H., Paydar M., Radmehr B., Ismail S. (2015). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk and dairy products. Food Control 54 383–388. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jarraud S., Mougel C., Thioulouse J., Lina G., Meugnier H., Forey F., et al. (2002). Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (Alleles), and human disease. Infect. Immun. 70:631. 10.1128/IAI.70.2.631-641.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jarraud S., Peyrat M. A., Lim A., Tristan A., Bes M., Mougel C., et al. (2001). egc, a highly prevalent operon of enterotoxin gene, forms a putative nursery of superantigens in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Immun. 166:669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones T. F., Kellum M. E., Porter S. S., Michael B., William S. (2002). An outbreak of community-acquired foodborne illness caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8 82–84. 10.3201/eid0801.010174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kadariya J., Smith T. C., Thapaliya D. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: an ongoing challenge in public health. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014:9. 10.1155/2014/827965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kanika B., Wang X., Susan D., Marcus Z., Da R. L., Zhang Y. (2011). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in retail meat, Detroit, Michigan, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:1135. 10.3201/eid1706.101905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Krouanton A., Hennekinne J. A., Letertre C., Petit L., Chesneau O., Brisabois A.et al. (2007). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with food poisoning outbreaks in France. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 115 369–375. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khoramrooz S. S., Mansouri F., Marashifard M., Malek Hosseini S. A., Akbarian C.-O. F., Ganavehei B., et al. (2016). Detection of biofilm related genes, classical enterotoxin genes and agr typing among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine with subclinical mastitis in southwest of Iran. Microb. Pathog. 97 45–51. 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Krziwanek K., Metzgercek S., Mittermayer H. (2009). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from human patients, Upper Austria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15 766–769. 10.3201/eid1505.080326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Larkin E. A., Carman R. J., Krakauer T., Stiles B. G. (2009). Staphylococcus aureus: the toxic presence of a pathogen extraordinaire. Curr. Med. Chem. 16 4003–4019. 10.2174/092986709789352321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee Y. T., Lin D. B., Wang W. Y., Tsao S. M., Yu S. F., Wei M. J., et al. (2011). First identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MLST types ST5 and ST45 and SCCmec types IV and Vt by multiplex PCR during an outbreak in a respiratory care ward in central Taiwan. Diagn. Microb. Infect. Dis. 70 175–182. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lindqvist R., Sylvén S., Vågsholm I. (2002). Quantitative microbial risk assessment exemplified by Staphylococcus aureus in unripened cheese made from raw milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 78 155–170. 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00237-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu R., Wang L. (2013). Study on China’s dairy consumption and influencing factors. Agric. Outlook 3 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  42. Loir Y. L., Baron F., Gautier M. I. (2003). Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet. Mol. Res. 2 63–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Melchior M. B., Fink-Gremmels J., Gaastra W. (2007). Extended antimicrobial susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis growing in biofilms. Vet. Microbiol. 125 141–149. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Miwa N., Kawamura A., Masuda T., Akiyama M. (2001). An outbreak of food poisoning due to egg yolk reaction-negative Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 64 361–366. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00446-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Neela V., Zafrul A. M., Mariana N. S., Belkum A. V., Yun K. L., Rad E. G. (2009). Prevalence of ST9 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs and pig handlers in Malaysia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:4138. 10.1128/JCM.01363-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pereyra E. A. L., Picech F., Renna M. S., Baravalle C., Andreotti C. S., Russi R., et al. (2016). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion and biofilm-producing genes and their expression during internalization in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Vet. Microbiol. 183 69–77. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Perez-Roth E., Claverie-Martın F., Villar J., Mendez-Alvarez S. (2001). Multiplex PCR for simultaneous identification of Staphylococcus aureus and detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 394037–4041. 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4037-4041.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Qian G., Guo X., Guo J., Wu J. (2011). China’s dairy crisis: impacts, causes and policy implications for a sustainable dairy industry. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 18 434–441. 10.1080/13504509.2011.581710 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rall V. L., Vieira F. P., Rall R., Vieitis R. L., Fernandes A., Jr., Candeias J. M., et al. (2008). PCR detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from raw and pasteurized milk. Vet. Microbiol. 132 408–413. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rasigade J. P., Dumitrescu O., Lina G. (2014). New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infet. 20 587–588. 10.1111/1469-0691.12718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Riva A., Borghi E., Cirasola D., Colmegna S., Borgo F., Amato E., et al. (2015). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk: prevalence, SCCmec typing, enterotoxin characterization, and antimicrobial resistance patterns. J. Food Protect. 78 1142. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rosengren A., Fabricius A., Guss B., Sylvén S., Lindqvist R. (2010). Occurrence of foodborne pathogens and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in cheese produced on farm-dairies. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144 263–269. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ryan C. A., Nickels M. K., Hargrettbean N. T., Potter M. E., Endo T., Mayer L., et al. (1987). Massive outbreak of antimicrobial-resistant salmonellosis traced to pasteurized milk. JAMA 258:3269. 10.1001/jama.1987.03400220069039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Salaberry S. R. S., Saidenberg A. B. S., Zuniga E., Melville P. A., Santos F. G. B., Guimarães E. C., et al. (2015). Virulence factors genes of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from caprine subclinical mastitis. Microb. Pathog. 85 35–39. 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Saunders N. A., Holmes A. (2007). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of Staphylococcus aureus. Methods Mol. Biol. 391:71. 10.1007/978-1-59745-468-1_6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Scallan E., Hoekstra R. M., Angulo F. J., Robert V. T., Marc-Alain W., Sharon L. R., et al. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17 7–15. 10.3201/eid1701.P11101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schaumburg F., Pauly M., Anoh E., Mossoun A., Wiersma L., Schubert G., et al. (2015). Staphylococcus aureus complex from animals and humans in three remote African regions. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 21 345.e1–345.e8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Scherrer D., Corti S., Muehlherr J. E., Zweifel C., Stephan R. (2004). Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from raw bulk-tank milk samples of goats and sheep. Vet. Microbiol. 101 101–107. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Shallcross L. J., Ellen F., Johnson A. M., Hayward A. C. (2013). The role of the Panton-valentine leucocidin toxin in staphylococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13 43–54. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70238-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shopsin B., Gomez M., Montgomery S. O., Smith D. H., Waddington M., Dodge D. E., et al. (1999). Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Skov R. L. (2009). Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of hospital-acquired infections. J. Hosp. Infect. 73 364–370. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Spanu V., Spanu C., Virdis S., Cossu F., Scarano C., De Santis E. P. (2012). Virulence factors and genetic variability of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from raw sheep’s milk cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 153 53–57. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Stegger M., Andersen P. S., Kearns A., Pichon B., Holmes M. A., Edwards G., et al. (2012). Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecA LGA251. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18 395–400. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Szweda P., Schielmann M., Milewski S., Frankowska A., Jakubczak A. (2012). Biofilm production and presence of ica and bap genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis in the eastern Poland. Polish J. Microbiol. 61 65–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tham W. A., Hajdu L. J., Danielssontham M. L. (1990). Bacteriological quality of on-farm manufactured goat cheese. Epidemiol. Infect. 104 87–100. 10.1017/S095026880005456X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Varshney A. K., Mediavilla J. R., Robiou N., Guh A., Wang X., Gialanella P., et al. (2009). Diverse enterotoxin gene profiles among clonal complexes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the Bronx, New York. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6839. 10.1128/AEM.00272-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vasudevan P., Nair M. K., Annamalai T., Venkitanarayanan K. S. (2003). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol. 92:179. 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00360-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang X., Meng J., Zhang J., Zhou T., Zhang Y., Yang B., et al. (2012). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from powdered infant formula milk and infant rice cereal in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 153 142–147. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.10.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu S., Huang J., Wu Q., Zhang F., Zhang J., Lei T., et al. (2018a). Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail vegetables in China. Front. Microbiol. 9:1263. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wu S., Huang J., Wu Q., Zhang J., Zhang F., Yang X., et al. (2018b). Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail meat and meat products in China: incidence, antibiotic resistance and genetic diversity. Front. Microbiol. 9:2767. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wu S., Wu Q., Zhang J., Chen M., Yan Z. (2015). Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from retail ready-to-eat foods in China. Food Control 47 340–347. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yu F., Li T., Huang X., Xie J., Xu Y., Tu J., et al. (2012). Virulence gene profiling and molecular characterization of hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bloodstream infection. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 74 363–368. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yu X. J., Yan J., Zhang J. F., Xue C. G., Dong R., Xie P. H., et al. (2010). Risk assessment of Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk and establishment of prevention and control measures. China Dairy Industry 38 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zmantar T., Chaieb K., Makni H., Miladi H., Abdallah F. B., Mahdouani K., et al. (2010). Detection by PCR of adhesins genes and slime production in clinical Staphylococcus aureus. J. Basic Microbiol. 48 308–314. 10.1002/jobm.200700289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (991.9KB, docx)

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES