Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Supercond Sci Technol. 2018;31:10.1088/1361-6668/aaa1b3. doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/aaa1b3

Readout architectures for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors

Adam N McCaughan 1
PMCID: PMC6459399  NIHMSID: NIHMS1508146  PMID: 30983702

Advances in the development of superconducting nanowire single photon detectors (SNSPDs) have guaranteed that they remain a leading photon detection technology in applications such as quantum information [13], low power optical communications [4], and the life sciences [5, 6]. Recent demonstrations have shown significant improvements in key metrics such as high count-rates [7], jitter (<15 ps) [8], wide wavelength-sensitivity (315 nm–10.6 μm) [911], and high efficiencies (>90%) with low dark counts (<1 Hz) [12, 13]. Additionally, these devices have seen rapid commercialization in the last 5 years, with several companies now offering plug-and-play systems, making them more accessible than ever. However, to date, the largest arrays have integrated a maximum of N = 64 SNSPD pixels. This limitation has prevented the development of a highefficiency single-photon-sensitive camera in the infrared and mid-infrared, as well as limited the scale of readout of on-chip integrated devices such as those used in quantum information [14]. It remains an open challenge to develop and implement a readout architecture that can scalably interface hundreds or thousands of SNSPDs.

What makes designing a SNSPD readout particularly difficult is that the output pulses they generate are both broadband and small in amplitude. After absorbing a photon, a typical SNSPD will produce a ~10 μA output current with a ~100 ps rising edge. When carried into a 50 Ω load, this amounts to less than a millivolt of signal. Although there is strong evidence that the local impedance environment of these nanowires is higher than that of most superconducting systems (>1 kΩ) [15, 16], trying to integrate a device with large output impedances can produce latching effects [17]. These properties make on-chip integration with semiconductor logic difficult, preventing the use of existing silicon-based array readout architectures like those already developed for single-photon avalanche diodes. There has been some progress in amplifying small superconducting signals into semiconductor-compatible signals [1821], but the amount of power required to amplify and digitize a bitstream from thousands of detectors makes it unlikely to be a solution for a large-scale readout. For small numbers of detectors, the most common method of readout is to connect each detector to its own 50 Ω coax line and microwave amplifier [22]. The amplified signals are then digitized at room temperature with conventional electronics, such as an oscilloscope or time-tagger. However, beyond a few hundred elements this solution becomes both cost-prohibitive and thermally impractical.

The challenge then is to create a readout architecture which maintains the desired performance characteristics while scaling to hundreds or thousands of detectors. For SNSPDs, their primary advantage over competitor technologies is their ability to count at high rates with low jitter, while maintaining a high detection efficiency and low rate of dark counts. Efficiency and dark count rate are related to the optical and material properties of the SNSPD and its surroundings, and thus those metrics are less likely to be affected by an electronic readout system. As a result, any candidate architecture should optimize for the metrics of count rate and jitter. Which of these metrics is more important varies by application; for instance, building an SNSPD camera for the detection of fast-moving exoplanets may require high total count-rates but be insensitive to poor jitter performance, while a quantum key distribution system may benefit from cutting-edge performance in both jitter and count rate.

Generally speaking, we can divide existing SNSPD readout architectures into two categories: those which attempt to provide on-chip digitization using superconducting electronics, and those which use analog multiplexing on-chip and then pass the multiplexed signal to conventional room temperature electronics for processing. There exists a tradeoff between the two approaches: digitization simplifies the processing required at room temperature at the cost of on-chip complexity, while analog multiplexing typically increases off-chip hardware requirements but reduces on-chip complexity.

At present, most of the larger SNSPD array demonstrations have been of the analog multiplexing variety. The implementations of this multiplexing vary widely and have various tradeoffs. For instance, the 64-pixel row-column readout demonstration [23] used only 2N readout lines, but the architecture has a reduced signal-to-noise as N grows. One alternate approach frequency-multi plexed 16 pixels onto a single feed line while preserving a low jitter, but required nontrivial readout hardware to parse the mixed signal [24]. Another analog scheme utilized the slow propagation velocity in the superconducting nanowire as a delay line, creating a time-of-flight imager. This imager had a large number of distinguishable pixels (N = 590) and low jitter, but its large inductance limited its count rate [25]. In addition to these architectures, there are also a number of other approaches which have been demonstrated at smaller scales [2629].

The prevalence of these analog implementations, however, in no way discounts the utility and potential of on-chip digitization. Rather, it is more likely an indication of the overhead cost and complexity of integrating a sensitive nanoscale sensor into superconducting digital system. Future systems, especially those with thousands of pixels, would likely benefit from on-chip digitization as a means of reducing off-chip hardware requirements. After all, photon detection in an SNSPD can be thought of as an approximately digital signal: since a typical SNSPD is not energy-resolving, the only analog information contained in a detection event is that of the time-of-arrival. Additionally, superconducting logic families excel at operating at high clock frequencies with low power dissipation [3032], and they also operate in a low-impedance environment, allowing their logic elements to be directly connected to SNSPDs.

There have already been a handful of demonstrations of SNSPD integration with single-flux quantum (SFQ) electronics. These Josephson junction-based electronics were used to digitize SNSPD signals on chip, and then pass that processed information directly to a system at room temperature. In one example, SFQ logic was used to merge the signals together from a four-pixel SNSPD array, and the circuit complexity scaled linearly, with each added pixel potentially requiring only 11 additional Josephson junctions [33]. However, this circuit was not able to read out the pixels independently—simultaneous detection events were lost. In another case, an SFQ circuit was realized which read out each element of a four-pixel array independently [34], although it required a slightly more complex design. The work by Miyajima et al is another step on the path towards on-chip digitization of SNSPD signals. The researchers were able to demonstrate an SFQ circuit capable of time-resolving input signals on the order of 10 ps, approaching the lowest jitters recorded for a single SNSPD. Still, there is much remaining research to be done in order to integrate SNSPDs with superconducting electronics. Future work will benefit from advances in Josephson junction fabrication development [35] as well as improved SFQ circuit design.

The advancement of several scientific fields and commercial endeavors will benefit from the development of future SNSPD readout architectures which can integrate hundreds or thousands of pixels. Development of these architectures is difficult, but there are a wide variety of approaches which have already been demonstrated for small numbers of pixels (N ≤ 64). Most of the present architectures rely on either on-chip analog multiplexing or on-chip digitization, with analog implementations currently dominating the field. Notably, one approach that has not yet been demonstrated is to combine analog multiplexing techniques with on-chip digitization. This type of analog–digital blending has been successful in semiconductor-based cameras such as the charge-coupled device and may allow SNSPD array sizes to be scaled while keeping the digitization circuit complexity low. The readout architectures shown so far have been promising, but breaching the thousand-pixel barrier while maintaining high efficiency, high count rate, low jitter, and low dark counts will still require additional innovation as well as disciplined engineering.

Acknowledgments

We thank S W Nam, Q Y Zhao, and F Najafi for helpful discussions. This is a contribution of NIST, an agency of the US government, not subject to copyright.

References

  • [1].Hadfield RH and Johansson G 2016. Superconducting Devices in Quantum Optics (Berlin: Springer; ) ( 10.1007/978-3-319-24091-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Valivarthi R, Puigibert MG, Zhou Q, Aguilar GH, Verma VB, Marsili F, Shaw MD, Nam SW, Oblak D and Tittel W 2016. Quantum teleportation across a metropolitan fibre network Nat. Photon 10 676–80 [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Silverstone JW et al. 2013. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources Nat. Photon 8 104–8 [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Grein ME et al. 2011. Design of a ground-based optical receiver for the lunar laser communications demonstration 2011 Int. Conf. on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) (IEEE) pp 78–82 [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Yamamoto J, Oura M, Yamashita T, Miki S, Jin T, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y, Terai H and Kinjo M 2015. Rotational diffusion measurements using polarization-dependent fluorescence correlation spectroscopy based on superconducting nanowire single-photon detector Opt. Express 23 32633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Gemmell NR, McCarthy A, Liu B, Tanner MG, Dorenbos SD, Zwiller V, Patterson MS, Buller GS, Wilson BC and Hadfield RH 2013. Singlet oxygen luminescence detection with a fiber-coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detector Opt. Express 21 5005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Kerman AJ, Rosenberg D, Molnar RJ and Dauler EA 2013. Readout of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors at high count rates J. Appl. Phys 113 144511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Miyajima S, Miki S, Yabuno M, Yamashita T and Terai H 2017. Timing discriminator based on single-flux-quantum circuit toward high time-resolved photon detection Supercond. Sci. Technol 30 12LT01 [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Wollman EE. et al. UV superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with high efficiency, low noise, and 4 K operating temperature. Opt. Express. 2017;25:26792. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.026792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Chen L, Schwarzer D, Verma VB, Stevens MJ, Marsili F, Mirin RP, Nam SW and Wodtke AM 2017. Mid-infrared laser-induced fluorescence with nanosecond time resolution using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector: new technology for molecular science Acc. Chem. Res 50 1400–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Korneev A, Korneeva Y, Florya I, Voronov B and Goltsman G 2012. NbN nanowire superconducting single-photon detector for mid-infrared Phys. Proc 36 72–6 [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Marsili F et al. 2013. Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency Nat. Photon 7 210–4 [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Zadeh IE, Los JWN, Gourgues RBM, Steinmetz V, Bulgarini G, Dobrovolskiy SM, Zwiller V and Dorenbos SN 2017. Single-photon detectors combining high efficiency, high detection rates, and ultra-high timing resolution APL Photonics 2 111301 [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Najafi F. et al. On-chip detection of non-classical light by scalable integration of singlephoton detectors. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:5873. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Annunziata AJ, Santavicca DF, Frunzio L, Catelani G, Rooks MJ, Frydman A and Prober DE 2010. Tunable superconducting nanoinductors Nanotechnology 21 445202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Santavicca DF, Adams JK, Grant LE, McCaughan AN and Berggren KK 2016. Microwave dynamics of high aspect ratio superconducting nanowires studied using self-resonance J. Appl. Phys 119 234302 [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Kerman A, Yang J, Molnar R, Dauler E and Berggren K 2009. Electrothermal feedback in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors Phys. Rev. B 79 100509(R) [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Bardin JC, Ravindran P, Chang S-W, Kumar R, Stern JA, Shaw MD, Russell DS and Farr WH 2013. A high-speed cryogenic SiGe channel combiner IC for large photon-starved SNSPD arrays 2013 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM) (IEEE) pp 215–8 [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Wuensch S, Crocoll E, Schubert M, Wende G, Meyer H-G and Siegel M 2007. Design and development of a cryogenic semiconductor amplifier for interfacing RSFQ circuits at 4.2 K Supercond. Sci. Technol 20 S356–61 [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Suzuki M, Maezawa M, Takato H, Nakagawa H, Hirayama F, Kiryu S, Aoyagi M, Sekigawa T and Shoji A 1999. An interface circuit for a Josephson-CMOS hybrid digital system IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond 9 3314–7 [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Zhao Q-Y, McCaughan AN, Dane AE, Berggren KK and Ortlepp T 2017. A nanocryotron comparator can connect single-flux-quantum circuits to conventional electronics Supercond. Sci. Technol 30 044002 [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Shaw MD, Marsili F, Beyer AD, Stern JA, Resta GV, Ravindran P, Chang S and Bardin J 2015. Arrays of WSi superconducting nanowire single photon detectors for deep-space optical communications CLEO: Applications and Technology 2015 (San Jose, CA, 10–15 May 2015) pp 3–4 [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Allman MS. et al. A near-infrared 64-pixel superconducting nanowire single photon detector array with integrated multiplexed readout. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;106:192601. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Doerner S, Kuzmin A, Wuensch S, Charaev I, Boes F, Zwick T and Siegel M 2017. Frequencymultiplexed bias and readout of a 16-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array Appl. Phys. Lett 111 032603 [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Zhao Q-Y, Zhu D, Calandri N, Dane AE, McCaughan AN, Bellei F, Wang H-Z, Santavicca DF and Berggren KK 2017. Single-photon imager based on a superconducting nanowire delay line Nat. Photon 11 247–51 [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zhu D, Zhao Q-Y, Choi H, Lu T-J, Dane AE, Englund DR and Berggren KK 2017. A scalable multi-photon coincidence detector based on superconducting nanowires arXiv:1711.10546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Hofherr M, Arndt M, Il’In K, Henrich D, Siegel M, Toussaint J, May T and Meyer HG 2013. Time-tagged multiplexing of serially biased superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond 23 2501205 [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Zhao Q-Y, McCaughan AN, Bellei F, Najafi F, De Fazio D, Dane A, Ivry Y and Berggren KK 2013. Superconducting-nanowire single-photon-detector linear array Appl. Phys. Lett 103 142602 [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Divochiy A et al. 2008. Superconducting nanowire photon-number-resolving detector at telecommunication wavelengths Nat. Photon 2 302–6 [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Likharev KK, Mukhanov OA and Semenov VK 1985. Resistive single flux quantum logic for the Josephson-junction digital technology Proc. SQUID ’85 pp 1103–8 [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Semenov VK, Polyakov YA and Tolpygo SK 2015. New AC-powered SFQ digital circuits IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond 25 1301507 [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Mukhanov OA 2011. Energy-efficient single flux quantum technology IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond 21 760–9 [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Hofherr M. et al. Orthogonal sequencing multiplexer for superconducting nanowire singlephoton detectors with RSFQ electronics readout circuit. Opt. Express. 2012;20:28683. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.028683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Yamashita T, Miki S, Terai H, Makise K and Wang Z 2012. Crosstalk-free operation of multielement superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array integrated with singleflux-quantum circuit in a 0.1 W Gifford-McMahon cryocooler Opt. Lett 37 2982–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Cybart SA, Herr A, Kornev V and Foley CP 2017. Do multiple Josephson junctions make better devices? Supercond. Sci. Technol 30 090201 [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES